Connect with us
https://yoursportsnation.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/call-to-1.png

NIL

Texas A&M Baseball 2025 Transfer Portal Tracker

Published

on

Texas A&M Baseball 2025 Transfer Portal Tracker

It’s been a whirlwind 2025 season for the Texas A&M baseball team, filled with ups and downs that ultimately led to a disappointing finish. After becoming the first preseason No. 1 team in decades to miss the NCAA Tournament, first-year head coach Michael Earley’s job was in question for weeks.

However, Texas A&M athletic director Trev Alberts announced that Earley would be retained, though changes were on the horizon. One of those changes came in the coaching staff, with fielding coach Will Fox being the first to be let go. Fox spent six seasons in Aggieland, but given the number of errors on seemingly routine plays, the Aggies felt it was time to move in a different direction. More staffing changes could follow, and the same uncertainty applies to the roster.

While several players have already committed to returning under Earley for the 2026 season, others will inevitably depart for personal reasons. Entering the transfer portal does not necessarily mean a player is leaving, but starting the process early offers the best chance of finding a new team.

To help keep track, here is the updated transfer portal tracker of who is going and who is coming.

Entered Portal:

Kyrin LeBlanc – Pitcher – Junior

Nathan Tobin – Outfield – Freshman

Hayden Crites – Catcher – Freshman

Committed / Returning to A&M:

Gavin Grahovac – Infield – Sophomore

Terrence Kiel II – Outfield – Freshman

Clayton Freshcorn – Pitcher – Sophomore

Caden McCoy – Pitcher – Freshman

Bear Harrison – Catcher – Sophomore

Contact/Follow us @AggiesWire on X (formerly Twitter) and like our page on Facebook to follow ongoing coverage of Texas A&M news, notes and opinions. Follow Jarrett Johnson on X: @whosnextsports1.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

NIL

Ty Simpson offered $6.5 million by Miami Hurricanes for 2026 season

Published

on


Jan. 12, 2026, 12:46 p.m. ET



Link

Continue Reading

NIL

Urban Meyer names No. 1 college football head coaching move

Published

on


The college football head coaching carousel concluded one of its most chaotic cycles one month after the conclusion of the 2025 regular season.

No fewer than 18 different Power Four programs will have a new head coach in the 2026 college football season. Some fired coaches for poor performance, some fired coaches for cause, and others had their head coaches hired away by other Power Four programs.

The question for each school that hired a new coach is how quickly its program can succeed under said coach. Some programs take longer to build, while others make people feel better about themselves after their first season under a coach.

Retired three-time national champion head coach Urban Meyer made predictions for which programs will succeed the quickest under their new head coaches. He listed three different programs forecasted to see quick turnarounds on “The Triple Option Podcast.”

Tosh Lupoi ahead of the 2025 Peach Bowl.

Oregon defensive coordinator Tosh Lupoi speaks during a media day as the Oregon Ducks arrive on Jan. 7, 2025, in Atlanta, Georgia ahead of the Peach Bowl at Mercedes-Benz Stadium. | Ben Lonergan/The Register-Guard / USA TODAY NETWORK via Imagn Images

Meyer ranked California’s hire of Tosh Lupoi as the third-best hire in the offseason, citing Lupoi’s ability to recruit and the play of his defenses as rationale for a speedy rise for the Golden Bears as a national power. No. 2 was Florida bringing in Jon Sumrall from Tulane because of how quickly he expects the Gators’ style of play to change.

The No. 1 hire in the 2026 coaching carousel, according to Meyer, was Michigan’s hiring of Kyle Whittingham, the very last hiring of the cycle.

Kyle Whittingham during Michigan's basketball game against USC.

Michigan football head coach Kyle Whittingham speaks as he is being introduced on the floor during the first half between Michigan and USC at Crisler Center in Ann Arbor on Friday, Jan. 2, 2026. | Junfu Han / USA TODAY NETWORK via Imagn Images

“The impactful ones in this order are, No. 1 is Kyle Whittingham,” Meyer said on the podcast. “And not just (Michigan earning) Ws, but just the way they’re going to go about their business.”

Meyer is very familiar with Michigan, having coached opposite the Wolverines in “The Game.” He was Ohio State’s head coach from 2012-2018, a stretch in which the Buckeyes only missed two Big Ten Championship games and never lost to the Wolverines. In addition to Michigan as a program, Meyer is also very familiar with its new head coach.

Following a two-year tenure at Bowling Green, Meyer took the head coaching vacancy at Utah in 2003. Kyle Whittingham was entering his tenth season on the Utes’ staff when Meyer took over. Whittingham succeeded Meyer as head coach after Meyer’s 22-2 record in two seasons catapulted him into the head coaching vacancy left at Florida by Ron Zook in the 2005 offseason.

Kyle Whittingham in Utah's game against Baylor,

Utah Utes head coach Kyle Whittingham looks on from the sidelines during the first half against the Baylor Bears | Chris Jones-Imagn Images

Michigan was wrapping up its second season under Sherrone Moore when the Wolverines decided to fire him with cause on Dec. 10, 2025. The Wolverines were 17-9 in the two seasons with Moore at the helm.



Link

Continue Reading

NIL

Ty Simpson declares for NFL Draft: Alabama QB still holds lucrative NIL offers

Published

on


simp.png
Getty Images

With the 2026 NFL Draft’s early entry deadline looming, Alabama quarterback Ty Simpson has several lucrative NIL offers related to the 2026 transfer portal, AL.com reports. While the report states Simpson staying in the NFL Draft is “not a done deal,” 247Sports reports that Simpson is “not wavering” on his decision. Simpson’s offers include three from SEC schools “north of $4 million” and one program reportedly offering a $6.5 million package, sources told AL.com.

Wednesday represents the deadline for underclassmen to enter the NFL Draft. Simpson’s father, UT-Martin head coach Jason Simpson, told ESPN his son has received first-round grades from every NFL general manager spoken to since the season ended. He also confirmed to ESPN that several programs expressed transfer interest, including Miami, Oregon and Tennessee.

“There were very, very lucrative opportunities to play another year of college football,” Jason Simpson said.

CBS Sports previously reported that Miami and LSU were two of the programs left on the board expected to sign a top-end quarterback, options that include former Arizona State star Sam Leavitt. Multiple sources close to Miami told CBS Sports over the weekend that the Alabama quarterback could enter the picture for the Hurricanes.

In CBS Sports’ latest mock draft first round from Mike Renner, Simpson is slotted to go 29th overall to the Los Angeles Rams as a possible heir to veteran Matthew Stafford. Simpson is the No. 3 quarterback behind Indiana’s Fernando Mendoza and Oregon’s Dante Moore.

Simpson completed 64.5% of his passes for 3,567 yards with 28 touchdowns and five interceptions during the 2025 season, his first as a starter after sitting the last two years in Tuscaloosa behind Jalen Milroe.

“Yes, they would love for him to come back,” Jason Simpson said of Alabama’s coaching staff. “But if you’ve got an opportunity to go be a first-round pick in the NFL draft, you go. That’s why they pour all that into you, for that individual opportunity, so I really appreciated them.”





Link

Continue Reading

NIL

Ty Simpson’s NFL Future Isn’t Locked In, And the NIL Numbers Are Getting Wild

Published

on


Ty Simpson has made his intention to enter the NFL Draft known, but that decision may not be as final as it once appeared.

As the clock winds down toward Wednesday’s official NFL Draft declaration deadline, Simpson’s name is still very much circulating in college football circles. According to sources familiar with the situation, multiple SEC football programs are continuing to push hard behind the scenes, hoping to convince the Alabama quarterback to return to the college game for the 2026 season. Even after announcing his draft intentions, Simpson has reportedly remained the subject of aggressive NIL pursuit through third-party channels

Advertisement

What is clear, however, is the money involved.

One program has reportedly put a package on the table that could reach as high as $6.5 million for Simpson to suit up in 2026. Beyond that, multiple SEC schools, at least three, per AL.com, have floated offers north of $4 million, with incentives that could push those totals even higher.

That level of interest isn’t random. I

t’s a direct reflection of the current quarterback landscape heading into 2026.

Elite quarterbacks are scarce.

The demand is massive.

And the pressure to compete for a College Football Playoff spot has never been higher.

As sports attorney Darren Heitner explained, the market dynamics are doing exactly what markets do when supply runs thin:

Advertisement

“Several teams chasing a shrinking pool of elite quarterbacks, combined with the pressure to field a CFP contender, could drive up the price for certain players who have yet to transfer and/or are considering the NFL Draft and are seen as transformative,” Heitner said. “It’s basic economics where leverage meets scarcity.”

That leverage belongs to Simpson right now, and it’s rare.

It’s the kind of leverage only a handful of quarterbacks ever experience, where every decision reshapes not just their future, but the plans of entire programs and front offices. NFL scouts are evaluating long-term upside and readiness. NIL collectives are weighing risk versus reward. College coaches are staring at their quarterback rooms, knowing one elite decision could define, or derail, their 2026 season.

Everyone is pulling on the same thread, trying to see which direction Simpson will go.

Advertisement

And until that deadline hits, nothing is final.

Nothing is settled.

Every option remains on the table.

Whether Simpson ultimately stays in the NFL Draft or sends shockwaves through college football by choosing to return for another season, one thing is crystal clear: the quarterback market has reached unprecedented territory.

Experience matters.

Leadership matters.

And proven production matters more than ever.

And right now, Alabama Football’s own Ty Simpson sits at the center of it all, a reminder that in today’s game, elite quarterbacks don’t just lead offenses.

They set markets.



Link

Continue Reading

NIL

So what are schools spending money on now?

Published

on


Good morning, and thanks for spending part of your day with Extra Points.

I’m headed to Washington, D.C. (okay fiiiine, Maryland), tomorrow for the NCAA convention. Kyle Rowland of NIL Wire and I will be around until Thursday evening, and we’d love to say hello and chat! If you’d like to meet up, shoot me an email. We are also hosting a happy hour with College Sports Solutions at 8 p.m. on Wednesday at the Belvedere Lobby Bar. No RSVP is required, so feel free to join us for some beverages and off-the-record conversations.

Made in Chicago: Custom, licensed luggage tags for your student-athletes

Elevate your team’s travel gear with a partner you can trust. Desert Cactus is an officially licensed licensee for more than 625 colleges and universities, meaning they already know your brand standards. They produce high-quality, durable acrylic luggage tags in the Chicagoland area.

Perfect for student-athlete backpacks and travel bags, their tags are fully customizable with athlete names, jersey numbers and specific sport designations. Get the professional look your program deserves from a proven industry partner.

For more information on bulk-order discounts, please contact Brad Schweitzer.

Since I’m flying Tuesday morning and will be out and about, I figured today would be a good day to open the ol’ mailbag and answer your questions. As always, mailbag questions are accepted on a rolling basis via email, Bluesky, texting, etc.

Some NCAA-sponsored sports adding plenty of new teams at the moment include beach volleyball, STUNT, women’s wrestling and lacrosse. These sports don’t typically require as much in the way of startup costs (you don’t need to build a new facility for a women’s wrestling program, after all), have growing high school and club participation levels and can provide a lower-cost way for schools to comply with Title IX sport sponsorship requirements.

Usually, if a school is adding sports, it’s because it is more focused on enrollment-related goals and/or Title IX/conference sport sponsorship requirements, rather than competitive excellence or ticket revenue generation. So sports that don’t require lots of supporting infrastructure and have access to enough recruits will always be attractive. That’s also why it is generally harder to add sports like hockey or baseball, since those tend to require more expensive infrastructure supports.

Across the country, and especially at the small school level, you also sometimes see growth in sport sponsorship that exists completely outside the NCAA. Examples of those sports include rugby, esports, ultimate frisbee and women’s flag football. Some of these may eventually fall under the purview of the NCAA … and some may not!

Speaking of spending money, reader Domo asks

Well … I think that depends on how you define “cutting back.”

It’s true that in Ye Olden Times (i.e., before 2020), it was common for schools to spend money on gold-plating locker rooms, practice facilities, meeting rooms and stadiums, all in the hope of improving recruiting outcomes. If you couldn’t directly give cash to athletes, the thinking was, you could woo them with sleep pods and podcasting studios and Big Buck Hunter arcade cabinets.

But if you want to play Big Buck Hunter, you don’t need to go to a school with a machine in the locker room. You don’t even need to go to Dave and Busters. You can just buy a machine yourself, thanks to cash. And schools, be it via officially sanctioned House payments or whatever we’re pretending marketing deals are, can now give athletes that cash directly.

I’ve heard of a few Power 4 programs that have either postponed or scaled back previously planned facility investments that would fall under this category so they can spend that money directly paying athletes (as well as other stuff). Personally, I think that’s a better investment anyway.

But not every facility investment is “turning the film room into a go-kart track.” Schools also spend money on facilities to do mundane stuff like “keep stadiums built in 1927 at least kinda up to modern building codes” or “add Wi-Fi” or “replace bleachers with actual chairs.”

In fact, because of this crushing need to grow revenue at every level, many programs are looking at spending more on facilities … to help their stadiums better monetize their audience. That means more luxury boxes, more high-end concessions, more bathrooms (so you can serve more booze), more parking and more experiences. Conspicuously absent from that list, of course, is more seating. Usually, capacity is getting smaller, not larger.

So I wouldn’t look for facility improvements or spending to bottom out in the near future. Schools are just going to spend on different things. The driving question at most programs right now is “how can we drive more revenue from our existing fans, corporate partners and real estate footprint?” … and the answer sometimes requires building more stuff.

Sure, I think that could happen. I’ve talked to some mid-major athletic directors and coaches who would explicitly prefer for that to happen (as a way for their schools to get some sort of long-term benefit for developing high school players who won’t stay), and I understand why lawyers, agents and reporters occasionally propose it.

I think there are two related challenges to implementing this system. One is the College Sports Commission. We’re seven months out from House, and nobody has gotten in trouble for breaking any of the rev-share or “third party NIL” rules. There have been guideline updates, and most everybody is making some sort of effort to at least partially comply, but there haven’t been any actual penalties.

Without some sort of regulatory system that is actually enforced, I don’t think a transfer fee system can ever actually work … since who will be in charge to actually make sure those fees are properly paid? Can state courts be trusted to enforce player contracts with schools? Can they enforce those contracts quickly enough? How will transfer fees be permitted to be used? Will they be taxable income?

Even if the CSC (or something else) gets patched up, I’m not certain a fee system can work at scale without either employment status or some sort of federal exemption that provides clarity.

But those are the same challenges to nearly every other sort of reform effort to player movement and compensation. I don’t think that’s unique to transfer fees.

A better way to trade Nvidia

Nvidia has already delivered a staggering 80% gain year-over-year, building a $4.35 trillion empire. But here’s the million-dollar question: Where does Nvidia go from here? 
Our advanced A.I. models are painting a different picture for the immediate future.

Reader Sheep Launcher asks:

Under the pre-2020 rule set, I would typically tell people there were reasons why sleeping giants were sleeping … and it’s uncommon for them to wake up. Institutions that appeared to have favorable demographics or resources, upon further inspection, often didn’t. You will not convince me that Maryland football, for example, is just waiting to finally become an elite program, no matter how many good athletes play at DeMatha.

But in the post-NIL, post-portal and post-rev share world, perhaps previous assumptions are worth revisiting.

If we want to use Sheep Launcher’s definition (a school that is reporting a lot of revenue but not as much elite success), there might be a few candidates.

I pulled up the FY24 top programs in royalties, licensing, advertisement and sponsorships revenue from the Extra Points Library. This might be a more useful proxy for revenue generation than total revenue, since isolating sponsorship money removes stuff like student fees, institutional support and “just having a huge stadium” from the picture.

You can probably predict the top teams: Texas, Michigan, Ohio State, Texas A&M, Florida State, etc. Surprisingly high is Louisville (sixth!), Arizona State (15th) and Nebraska (17th). If you sort by ticket revenue, there are a few other programs surprisingly high, like Arkansas (5th), Colorado (17th), Louisville (20th).

If I had to pick a program that was underachieving relative to total earned athletic revenues over the past few years, my answer would probably be Texas A&M, Nebraska or Washington. If I had to pick a program I think could become a substantially more successful department in the future, just based on revenues right now … I’d go with Arizona State.

I’m open to other suggestions, though. Leave ’em in the comments..

Let’s get out of here on this one:

Boy, this is a tough one, because I don’t think most of the other great college football turnaround stories were that sudden.

Take Northwestern, for example. The football team was absolute garbage from the late 1960s to early 1990s. In 1995, it made the Rose Bowl under Gary Barnett … but that was in his fourth season. The Wildcats went 3-8, 2-9 and 3-7-1 before exploding to a 10-2 record.

The faster Northwestern turnaround story was back in the dang 1930s. When Pappy Waldorf took over for Dick Hanley in 1935, the Wildcats went 4-3-1. The next season? They went 7-1 and held the No. 1 spot in the AP poll for three weeks.

Kansas State stunk for a few years before Bill Snyder broke through in 1993. Frank Beamer was bad or average for several years at Virginia Tech before the Hokies won nine games in 1993. Barry Alvarez had three losing seasons before making the Rose Bowl at Wisconsin.

I guess the closest thing we’ve gotten in the modern era was at UCF. In George O’Leary’s last season in 2015, UCF went 0-12. Scott Frost went 6-7 in his first season, and then won a national title* with a 13-0 season in year two.

But even that isn’t what Indiana did. UCF only really sucked for one season, and it took more than one to turn the ship around. This Indiana football story, as far as I know, is in a class of its own.



Link

Continue Reading

NIL

College Football’s Expanded Playoff Works. Its Rhythm Doesn’t.

Published

on


Fernando Mendoza of the Indiana Hoosiers throws against the Oregon Ducks during the fourth quarter in the CFP Semifinal Chick-fil-A Peach Bowl at Mercedes-Benz Stadium on January 9, 2026. (CFP/Getty Images)

One of the most compelling sales pitches for the new(ish) expanded College Football Playoff, now in its second season of existence, was that it offered more teams chances to prove their worth on the field, rather than in computer formulae or the backrooms of the sport’s halls of power. And with apologies to notable snubs like Notre Dame, that’s mostly been the case. Eighth-seeded Ohio State fought through the strongest opponents of any modern champion last year, while next Monday’s championship game will pit undefeated Indiana — who might have a case as the greatest champ ever — against No. 10 seed Miami, who earned every bit of their way to play the title game at their home stadium.

The price for all of that, however, was adding to the disoriented and discontented feeling that generally pervades the sport right now.

Last week, The Athletic conducted a “vibe-check” poll of college football fans, asking how they felt about the sport. And the results were not exactly pretty. Out of more than 12,000 voters, roughly 56 percent said they did not like the state of college football at the moment because “it’s a mess” — more than two-and-a-half as many respondents who said they liked the sport because “the games are great”:

To be clear, I suspect the majority of that comes from the off-field chaos — from money-chasing coaches like Lane Kiffin to the sense that NIL and the transfer portal have fundamentally turned college football into a completely different sport than it used to be. (A viewpoint with which I sympathize, though the upside has been to allow non-traditional powers inject the sport with much-needed parity.)

But other changes have plunged the sport still deeper into the uncanny valley between its amateur past and an increasingly professionalized future. I wrote last month about the toll the new playoff was taking on the last remaining vestiges of the classic bowl system, and this time a year ago I noted how absurdly long and drawn-out bowl season was in the age of the expanded CFP:

Just like last season, this year’s title game will take place a full 38 days after the beginning of bowl season — and 32 days since the opening game of the playoff itself. For comparison’s sake, pre-playoff bowl season used to span an average of 19.1 days, and the old four-team playoff lasted an average of 10.9 days from beginning to end. Now we will have a gap longer than that simply between Miami and Indiana’s semifinal victories at the end of last week and the title game a week from tonight.

If that (and really the whole thing in general) feels weird and long, it might be because we’re still thinking of things in college terms — when, like everything else in the sport right now, we probably should be putting it in pro terms instead. Here’s a comparison between various different formats (plus March Madness, thrown in for fun) when it comes to their average days until the championship at each round of the playoffs:

The 12-team college playoff has taken slightly longer (31.8 days) to get to the championship than the 14-team NFL playoffs (29.2). But generally, the cadence matches pretty closely, right down to the double-digit day gap between the semifinals and final. (Conversely, it would be a lot to ask football players to turn around within a few days and play the championship, like they do in basketball’s Final Four.)

So, then, what makes the NFL’s postseason rhythm feel so much more normal than college football’s? Well, in addition to the novelty of the college playoff even having this many teams and rounds, the NFL gets to muscle college off of the premium days for playoff scheduling. As Club Sportico’s Eben Novy-Williams notes here, the odd timing of the CFP’s biggest games is mainly a byproduct of the NFL’s dominance of the January calendar.

While college football “owns” Saturdays in the fall, thanks to protections in the 1961 Sports Broadcasting Act, those safeguards expire in mid-December, freeing the NFL to schedule late regular season and playoff games on Saturdays and Sundays. And rather than going head-to-head with the NFL postseason, the College Football Playoff and its TV partners must push marquee games to weekday nights where they can be the biggest event on the schedule. In their current formats, nearly 92 percent of NFL playoff games have been on weekends, while only 9 percent of college playoff games can say the same. (Many more have been on random-feeling days like Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday and especially Friday.)

That tradeoff reflects a broader paradox for modern college sports: What makes college football special is its tradition and atmosphere — but what makes it valuable is television. And as the NFL continues to broaden its reach across more days of the year and college football continues to expand its playoff bracket, the latter increasingly finds itself chasing whatever visibility it can find, wherever it can be found. As a result, college football is now no longer the biggest thing on the calendar when its games matter the most.

That sensation, as much as any, is what fans can’t quite shake — even as the cream rises to the top more than ever and the football itself can be plenty exciting (when Indiana isn’t blowing the doors off everyone, that is). This no longer feels quite like the sport we used to organize our lives around, and the weirdo cadence of the playoff schedule is one of the most glaring signs of that shift. That doesn’t mean the expanded playoff was a mistake, but it does mean college football is asking us to recalibrate how we experience it: Following a game that looks like a pro league in more and more ways, even as it still demands to be loved like a campus tradition.

Filed under: College Football, Football



Link

Continue Reading

Most Viewed Posts

Trending