Former LSU football HC Ed Orgeron ‘jokes’ NIL existed in SEC before it was legal appeared first on ClutchPoints. Add ClutchPoints as a Preferred Source by clicking here.

College football has changed a lot over the last few seasons due to the widespread transfer portal and NIL, but mainly because of NIL. Especially with former players being paid a lot of money in back pay. The ability for players to get paid was a long time in the making. However, there was always an undercurrent of players getting paid in some fashion, and former LSU football head coach Ed Orgeron even joked recently that NIL existed in the SEC before it was legal.

Advertisement

On a recent episode of “Bussin’ With the Boys,” former LSU football head coach Ed Orgeron was on for a long-ranging interview. He talked about NIL and joked about how in the SEC, the only difference is that you can walk in through the front door with the money now, compared to the old way of doing it secretly.

Orgeron said, “They say, ‘Hey coach, you know, you’ve been out of coaching for a while and how are you going to adjust to NIL?’ I said, ‘Well, it’s a minor adjustment.’ and they said, ‘What do you mean?’ I said, ‘Back then we used to walk through the back door with the cash, and now we just got to walk through the front door with the cash.’ A joke obviously.”

Taylor Lewan also asked Orgeron if there was an unwritten rule that an SEC team wouldn’t offer more money to an in-state player than that in-state school could offer. Orgeron said there was, but they were always broken.

“Rules are meant to be broken,” Orgeron said. “Because that s—t didn’t go down. They might’ve had an unwritten rule, but they were broken all the time.”

Advertisement

Orgeron has had two coaching jobs in the SEC, with his first at Ole Miss and his second at LSU. He has had a reputation throughout his time in college football as an elite recruiter, so Orgeron would have extensive knowledge of past dealings involving money.

When Orgeron was at Ole Miss, his most notable recruits were Michael Oher, Dexter McCluster, and Mike Wallace. Then, at LSU, he recruited Ja’Marr Chase, Joe Burrow (Transfer), Derek Stingley, Kayshon Boutte, and Clyde Edwards-Helaire.

The ability to recruit players is more coveted than ever due to the NIL era, and it’s only a matter of time before Orgeron ends up back in coaching, whether that’s on Lane Kiffin’s staff at LSU or somewhere else.

Related: Ed Orgeron planning coaching return with very specific demands

Related: AD accuses ACC of 3-week attack on Notre Dame football amid CFP drama

SALT LAKE CITY — With an eye on remaining one of the nation’s top athletic programs in the rapidly evolving world of college sports, Utah Athletics is moving forward with a groundbreaking private equity partnership and corporate restructuring that could fundamentally reshape how the Utes fund and operate their athletics enterprise.

The news, broken first by Yahoo Sports’s Ross Dellenger Tuesday morning, specified that the entire Utah Athletics Department will be reorganized into a newly created for-profit holding company, Utah Brands & Entertainment LLC, co-owned with New York-based private equity firm Otro Capital.

The deal — believed to be the first of its kind in collegiate athletics — is expected to generate up to $500 million in new capital for Utah’s athletic department through a combination of the equity infusion and donor commitments. The university retains majority ownership and decision-making of Utah Brands & Entertainment.

Utah Brands & Entertainment LLC

“First of all, want to thank our University’s Board of Trustees for the intense scrutiny that they have given to this new and innovative way to fund University of Utah athletics,” President Taylor Randall shared of the venture.

He continued, “we are excited about this new innovation in University of Utah athletics, this will give our institution, particularly our athletic institution, the upside it needs to thrive in the new revenue sharing and NIL era.”

This corporate offshoot will assume responsibility for major commercial operations historically housed within the athletic department, including ticket sales, media and broadcast ventures, stadium events, concessions, licensing and trademark management, corporate sponsorships, and other revenue streams.

Under the agreement approved by the NCAA and the University of Utah Board of Trustees, the university will retain majority ownership and decision-making authority within the new company, while Otro Capital will hold a minority stake and receive a share of annual revenue based on performance.

The structure includes an exit strategy after five to seven years, during which the university has the right to repurchase Otro’s ownership stake.

Athletics Director Mark Harlan is slated to chair the board of Utah Brands & Entertainment, which will elect an external president to oversee day-to-day operations. Traditional fundraising and coaching functions will continue to operate under the university’s umbrella, while the new entity focuses on commercial expansion and revenue growth. Enlarging the donor base with equity participation options also allows Utah supporters to purchase a stake in the venture — a novel approach not yet seen at peer institutions.

“We’re going to use this to find excellence in Utah Athletics,” President Randall shared.

This process has been underway for over a calendar year. Utah was focused on finding the best cultural fit and landed on Otro Capital. Multiple firms were vetted.

— Steve Bartle (@BartleKSLsports) December 9, 2025

Leadership and operations will be staffed jointly by university and athletics officials, as well industry professionals is intended to unlock new income opportunities with greater agility than a traditional university structure typically allows.

What does this mean for Utah NIL?

Many will be wondering what this means for Utah’s NIL.  With this, Mark Harlan believes that this will have a significant impact on Utah’s NIL opportunities.

“We’re bringing in folks that have been involved in NIL in the professional space for years,” Harlan said. “I’ve been real proud of our efforts and how we’ve handled NIL. You don’t retain the kind of players that we’ve had in many sports if we don’t have a very robust program. But this allows us— in our recruiting process and retainment process, to really show what we are now surrounding our student athletes with appropriate and authentic NIL going forward.”

So, this does not directly fund Utah’s NIL opportunities, but it provide the platform and the professional understanding and know-how to generate more true 3rd-party NIL deals.

Harlan continued on about the importance of abiding by the rules and adhering to compliance of NIL. However, he also feels this will be important in providing Utah student athletes the best opportunities.

“Having the best platform for these student athletes that have worked on their brand through their hard work, and very best opportunities to work with pros, that have been doing this forever to enhance that brand and to include them in the deals that were out in the marketplace that is now legal, so we can do all those things that have changed and maximize those opportunities.”

The Bottom Line

The partnership is a bold strategy to navigate the financial realities of the post-House v. NCAA revenue-sharing era, in which schools will have faced increased cost burdens for athlete compensation and broader program sustainability.

In contrast to traditional holding company proposals occasionally floated by other universities, Utah’s deal pairs private capital with institutional control to balance innovation with governance.

University leaders believe this new model will help protect long-term stability, support upgrades across, strengthen competitiveness in the Big 12, and provide a funding foundation adaptable to future changes in college athletics.

If successful, Utah’s approach could serve as a blueprint for other programs exploring private capital solutions in a landscape where traditional revenue sources and rising expenses continue to challenge athletic departments nationwide.

Steve Bartle is the Utah insider for KSL Sports. He hosts The Utah Blockcast (SUBSCRIBE) and appears on KSL Sports Zone to break down the Utes. You can follow him on X for the latest Utah updates and game analysis.

Take us with you, wherever you go. Download the new & improved KSL Sports app from Utah’s sports leader. You can stream live radio, video and stay up to date on all of your favorite teams.

Follow @BartleKSLsports

ESPN’s Paul Finebaum is tired of non-Power Four schools so he called for the end of G5, or Group of Five (or Six) schools as we call them. He doesn’t want to see their inclusion in the College Football Playoff moving forward.

Amid an intense debate over Notre Dame, Miami and even Alabama, Tulane and James Madison found their way into the CFP by being conference champions. The Group of Five is guaranteed a spot considering the five-highest ranked conference champions get into the field. 

This year, because the ACC champion, Duke, was not ranked as high as James Madison, the Dukes got in along with top 20 Tulane as a second G5 school, the first in CFP history. But Finebaum called the product below the Power Four “unwatchable.”

“Well, it’s time to get rid of the G5 schools, and I know how they got in there. It was a compromise, but America does not want to see Tulane, nor do we want to see James Madison in the College Football Playoff,” Finebaum said on Get Up. “This is great in the NCAA basketball tournament, there are 68 schools. There are only 12 here, and we don’t need them around. And I’m not going to give you the with all due respect, because I don’t really care about Tulane or James Madison. They’re both going to lose by 25 to 45 points. They’ll be unwatchable games and get them out of a playoff.”

Despite the fact Tulane coach Jon Sumrall and James Madison coach Bob Chesney are leaving the G5 for Florida and UCLA, respectively, they want to finish the job this year. They’re guaranteed one more game, maybe more with upsets.

“I’ve said it a lot. I think just as important, if not more important than how you start at a place, it’s how you finish,” Sumrall said. “I’m forever indebted to Tulane. I was an assistant coach here over a decade ago. It’s been a complete privilege and honor for me to be the head football coach here. 

“And you know, I think in my introductory press conference two years ago I said, ‘We’re going to win the conference championship. We’re gonna go to the College Football Playoff.’ And I also said, ‘We’re going to win it,’ so we got work to do. Job’s not done.”

There never seemed to be much of a question about where Marcel Reed would play football next year, but in this era of multi-million dollar NIL deals, you never can be too sure, so the Texas A&M quarterback put to rest any possible anxiety from Aggies fans.

Griffin’s wife Grete, who co-hosts the podcast with her husband, got directly to the point, asking, “If Miami came today and offered you $4 million, what do you say?”

“I have to talk to my parents,” said Reed, before clearing up that he thinks Texas A&M is the best place for him to be.

Reed said he was offered deals from other schools after his freshman year with the Aggies. On the podcast, which is unclear if it was recorded before Texas A&M offensive coordinator Collin Klein got the head coaching job at Kansas State, Reed said he didn’t  consider those offers then and wouldn’t consider them now.

“I don’t think there’s any reason I need to leave Texas A&M,” Reed said. “I have the job and it’s mine to lose, and I don’t think I will. There’s no reason for me to leave. I think I have a great OC. I have a great coach, I have great players around me. We have the best stadium in college football. The best college town in college football … There’s no need for me to leave and go anywhere else.”

Reed didn’t say how much he makes in NIL currently, but did tell the Griffins, “I don’t live in the dorm, I’ll tell you that,” before revealing he lives in a four-bedroom house with 3 ½ baths.

“It’s pretty nice,” he said.

Reed also cleared up one rumor that has stuck throughout the football season. No, he is not dating Olympic gymnast Suni Lee.

With most of the country’s focus on who was snubbed by the College Football Playoff Selection Committee, college athletics reached another inflection point on Monday with the release of Athletes.org’s first-ever draft Collective Bargaining Agreement (CBA) framework. This document is designed to replace the current NIL-driven compensation model with a standardized, enforceable structure modeled on professional sports CBAs. While far from a final agreement, it’s the most detailed blueprint yet for what some players want a collectively bargained future to look like across NCAA Division I athletics. What do colleges and universities need to know about this step?

Where Things Stand: Labor Organizing and Legal Pressure Are Reshaping College Athletics

Over the last four years, momentum toward formal labor and employment rights for college athletes has accelerated dramatically.

NLRB Developments

For the moment, the National Labor Relations Board is the least likely source of any concerns for college athletics. Not only does it presently lack a quorum to legally act, the Presidential administration is decidedly opposed to granting student athletes “employee” status. Indeed, the 2021 NLRB General Counsel memo declaring student athletes to be employees was rescinded in February, and efforts pre-dating the Trump administration to unionize Dartmouth basketball players and claiming athletes at the University of Southern California were employees were both voluntarily dismissed by player-advocates even before the new administration started.

The Johnson Litigation

In July 2024, the 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals ruled in Johnson v. NCAA that Division I student-athletes are not categorically barred from bringing claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). Instead, the court held that athletes “may be employees” when they perform services for their school (or the NCAA) primarily for the institution’s benefit, under the school’s control (or right of control), and in return for compensation or other benefits. This decision rejected the long-standing defense that the traditional concept of “amateurism” automatically excludes student-athletes from employee status. Johnson is now on remand in the District Court which is considering another round of motions to dismiss. It remains one of the most significant employment-law threats to the traditional collegiate model.

The House Settlement

The House settlement, while monumental in providing a revenue-sharing mechanism to student athletes, does not resolve long-term legal exposure. Judge Wilken expressly acknowledged that the agreement does not carry the protections of the non-statutory labor exemption because it is not collectively bargained. Athletes.org echoed this point in its own amicus briefing, emphasizing that without a CBA, universities remain vulnerable to antitrust claims, compensation-related challenges, and future litigation over inconsistent athlete treatment.

Inside the CBA Proposal: Key Components of the Athletes.org Framework

Athletes.org is a newly formed players association seeking to organize college athletes and position itself as the negotiating representative in any future restructuring of college sports. While still early in its development and lacking formal recognition, it claims to represent more than 5,000 student athletes and is actively pushing for a collective bargaining model that would shift many operational and financial decisions away from institutions.

For campus leaders, the framework serves as an early signal of the issues that could arise if collective bargaining becomes part of the collegiate athletics landscape. The 38-page draft CBA framework is ambitious and built consciously on the architecture of professional sports CBAs. Its stated goal is to provide “a sustainable, enforceable structure for college athletics” that consolidates athlete compensation, standardizes contractual terms, and reduces litigation risk.

Five components stand out:

1. A Standardized Athlete Services Contract