NIL
How the NCAA House Settlement Will Change College Football | Nebraska Football & NIL Discussion
In this episode of Monday Night Therapy, host Minnie Hunt is joined by Pigskin PD (Peter Bartell) and law professor Adam Lamparello for an in-depth look at the NCAA House Settlement and its massive impact on the future of college football. The panel breaks down how the new system allows universities to pay up to $20.5 million annually to athletes, alongside NIL deals, and explores the legal, competitive, and Title IX ramifications. Adam explains why this structure may further widen the gap between powerhouse programs and smaller schools—sparking antitrust concerns and long legal battles.
The conversation also dives into Nebraska football’s identity, the importance of returning to its physical, trench-dominant style, and head coach Matt Rhule’s efforts to rebuild the program. The group reflects on Nebraska legends like Tommy Frazier and Lawrence Phillips while discussing NIL’s broader impact on player movement, recruiting, and competitive balance across college football.
If you’re passionate about Nebraska football history, college football NIL, or the changing landscape of the sport, this is an essential discussion. Plus, hear some fun memories about the 1869 Rutgers-Princeton game and Nebraska’s storied quarterback legacy.
#NebraskaFootball #CollegeFootballHistory #NIL #NCAASettlement #GoBigRed
NIL
Updated 2026 college football recruiting rankings after national signing day
Even as most people’s attention turns to conference championship weekend and the race for the College Football Playoff, college football’s early signing period began on Wednesday. The early signing period runs through Friday, Dec. 5.
The “Early” signing period has become college football’s new national signing day as programs across the country are pushing their top prospects to enroll early, allowing them a chance to spend the spring semester on campus.
Rankings are expected to shift over the new few days as players potentially flip their commitment, choosing to sign elsewhere. The rankings below are updated as of Thursday morning after the first day of the early signing period.
Below are the updated college football recruiting rankings for the 2026 class, per the Rivals industry ranking.
10. Texas Longhorns (SEC)
Total Commits: 23
5-Stars: 3
4-Stars: 10
Avg. Rating: 90.18
Avg. NIL: $178K
Despite not breaking into the Top 5, the Longhorns signed a star-studded class, continuing the momentum from last season’s No. 1-ranked class. Five-star quarterback Dia Bell headlines the class, which also features five-star edge rusher Richard Wesley and five-star linebacker Tyler Atkinson. An underrated signing was four-star cornerback Hayward Howard Jr. out of Edna Carr High School in Louisiana.
9. Miami Hurricanes (ACC)
Total Commits: 30
5-Stars: 1
4-Stars: 19
Avg. Rating: 90.42
Avg. NIL: $155K
The Hurricanes have continued to set the pace on the recruiting trail in the ACC, landing the conference’s top-ranked class once again. Five-star offensive tackle Jackson Cantwell is the gem of the class, ranking as the No. 2 overall player in the 2026 class, according to the Rivals industry ranking. Miami also made sure to secure some homegrown talent, landing key in-state players such as Jaelen Waters, Somourian Wingo, and Asharri Charles.
8. Texas A&M Aggies (SEC)
Total Commits: 27
5-Stars: 1
4-Stars: 21
Avg. Rating: 90.83
Avg. NIL: $85K
The Aggies have secured another Top 10 recruiting class under head coach Mike Elko. Five-star cornerback Brandon Arrington appears to be an instant-impact signee, while KJ Edwards and Jayden Warren were massive in-state recruiting wins. Texas A&M also reached into Georgia, taking two promising prospects: defensive lineman Bryce Perry-Wright and wide receiver Aaron Gregory.
7. Tennessee Volunteers (SEC)
Total Commits: 28
5-Stars: 2
4-Stars: 13
Avg. Rating: 90.28
Avg. NIL: $151K
Tennessee continues to load up on elite offensive weapons, landing five-star quarterback Faizon Brandon and five-star wide receiver Tristen Keys. Both could compete for immediate playing time next season in Josh Heupel’s offense. The Volunteers also signed some underrated defensive prospects, including Hezekiah Harris and Jordan Carter, winning key recruiting battles against SEC rivals.
6. Alabama Crimson Tide (SEC)
Total Commits: 20
5-Stars: 3
4-Stars: 10
Avg. Rating: 91.95
Avg. NIL: $205K
It’s safe to say we can put the Kalen DeBoer recruiting concerns to rest with Alabama landing another Top 10 recruiting class. Five-star running back Ezavier Crowell was a massive in-state recruiting win, while five-stars Xavier Griffin and Jireh Edwards could have an immediate impact defensively. The Crimson Tide signed three of the Top 4 players in the state of Alabama, showing off its in-state dominance once again.
5. Ohio State Buckeyes (Big Ten)
Total Commits: 27
5-Stars: 1
4-Stars: 14
Avg. Rating: 90.91
Avg. NIL: $135K
Ohio State holds onto a Top 5 spot for now, but all eyes are watching five-star wide receiver Chris Henry Jr., who did not sign yesterday. Even without Henry, the Buckeyes should still firmly remain in the Top 10, but would not have a five-star signee, according to the Rivals industry ranking. Defensive lineman Khary Wilder and cornerback Jay Timmons are the next highest-ranked signees, both earning five-star ratings from Rivals, but are not industry five-stars.
4. Georgia Bulldogs (SEC)
Total Commits: 31
5-Stars: 1
4-Stars: 20
Avg. Rating: 90.77
Avg. NIL: $130K
Even with a smaller signing class, the Bulldogs secured one of the best recruiting classes in the country. Five-star tight end Kaiden Protho headlines the class, while offensive tackle Ekene Ogboko has been a prospect that’s rising through the player rankings, earning a fifth star from Rivals in the latest update. It was a strong defensive back class for the Bulldogs, who signed four-star cornerbacks Justice Fitzpatrick and Caden Harris, along with safety Jordan Smith.
3. Oregon Ducks (Big Ten)
Total Commits: 21
5-Stars: 5
4-Stars: 11
Avg. Rating: 92.13
Avg. NIL: $253K
If you are looking for quality over quantity, Oregon’s 2026 recruiting class is the perfect example. The Ducks signed five five-star prospects, including offensive tackle Immanuel Iheanacho, safety Jett Washington, and edge rusher Anthony “Tank” Jones. Oregon landed the No. 1 player from four states, including New York and Arizona. It was another impressive recruiting cycle under head coach Dan Lanning.
2. Notre Dame Fighting Irish (Ind.)
Total Commits: 27
5-Stars: 4
4-Stars: 15
Avg. Rating: 91.60
Avg. NIL: $101K
After missing the Top 10 last season, head coach Marcus Freeman and his staff really delivered on the recruiting trail. The Fighting Irish signed four five-stars, including edge rusher Rodney Durham, cornerback Khary Adams, tight end Ian Premer, and safety Joey O’Brien. Notre Dame continued its tradition of signing talented running backs, landing four-star Javian Osborne and Jonaz Walton.
1. USC Trojans (Big Ten)
Total Commits: 35
5-Stars: 1
4-Stars: 21
Avg. Rating: 90.83
Avg. NIL: $160K
After finishing 15th nationally in last year’s recruiting rankings, head coach Lincoln Riley ended the 18-year SEC streak of top recruiting classes. Five-star Mark Bowman headlines the class, representing a massive in-state recruiting win over other national powers. The Trojans also signed 16 Top 300 players in the Rivals industry ranking, along with the top JUCO tight end in Josiah Jefferson.
NIL
3 reasons NIL won’t destroy Ohio high school sports| Opinion
Dec. 4, 2025, 4:35 a.m. ET
- The Ohio High School Athletic Association voted to allow student-athletes to participate in name, image and likeness (NIL) deals.
Luke Fedlam is a partner and co-chair of the entertainment, sports and media practice at Amundsen Davis.
Before officials here followed suit, 44 states allowed high school athletes to participate in name, image and likeness deals.
The sky didn’t fall in those states, and the integrity of competition did not crumble.
There have been no widespread scandals or rampant recruiting chaos. Instead, high school students in those states have simply been granted the same economic freedom enjoyed by their non-athlete peers.
This moment offers a critical opportunity to separate fact from fear and acknowledge how dramatically different high school NIL is from the version we see dominating headlines at the college level.
Member schools of the Ohio High School Athletic Association voted Nov. 24 to allow athletes across the state of Ohio to participate in NIL opportunities.
The new rules give student-athletes the chance to enter into agreements and be compensated for NIL through appearances, licensing, social media, endorsements and/or the use of branding based on their public recognition or notoriety.
OHSAA bylaws establish reporting procedures and limitations so that student-athletes do not jeopardize their eligibility as it relates to the OHSAA’s recruiting and amateurism rules.
To understand why allowing NIL at the high school level is both reasonable and appropriate, it is important to recognize three key differences between high school and college NIL:
1. High school students cannot simply change schools for a better deal
One of the primary concerns raised by critics is the fear that NIL will encourage transferring solely to chase better opportunities. But unlike college sports, where the transfer portal creates a direct, immediate mechanism for athletes to move without penalty, high school athletic associations retain strict transfer rules that prevent high school student-athletes from jumping schools for athletic advantage.
In Ohio, a student who transfers without a qualifying reason is ineligible for all or much of the following season.
High school students cannot simply move to whichever school has a better deal waiting for them. The “arms race” narrative that has dominated college NIL discourse does not apply here. Instead, the existing guardrails ensure that high school NIL remains grounded in a student’s current school, current community and authentic personal relationships.
The system already has mechanisms for fairness and stability. NIL at the high school level does not change that.
2. Big donors with big banks won’t lure high schoolers away
The influence of donor-funded collectives in college sports has led to discomfort and confusion, often because the compensation being offered to athletes looks less like marketing and more like inducements to attend or remain at a particular institution. Those dynamics do not exist at the high school level.
There are no high school boosters pooling millions of dollars to acquire talent. High school sports are local, community-centered and grounded in volunteer and school-based support systems. This is one of the clearest distinctions between the two levels of competition.
High school NIL, where permitted, is not driven by institutions trying to recruit or retain players. It is driven by individual students, families and the opportunities they create. High school NIL is far more aligned with the spirit of personal entrepreneurship than college NIL.
There is no systemic, financial apparatus waiting to exploit or pressure these students. Without collectives and without athlete free agency, the NIL environment in high school stays true to its intended purpose: allowing student-athletes to participate in a fair marketplace when legitimate opportunities arise.
3. High school NIL is grounded in community and students
When NIL is discussed in college sports, we often talk about six-figure deals, national brand sponsorships and corporate negotiations tied to national broadcasting. High school NIL looks nothing like that, and that is precisely the point.
High school NIL is often a local athlete promoting a local business:
- A star point guard supporting a neighborhood pizza shop that wants to attract more teenage customers.
- A young softball player partnering with a local gym where she trains.
- A football player promoting a summer youth camp.
These are genuine, small-scale, community-based marketing exchanges rooted in actual influence and effort.
High school NIL is about fairness
It’s also important to highlight students would still need to provide real promotional value to earn compensation. High school NIL rewards talent, dedication, personality and community impact, not just athletic success.
This is where fairness must guide the conversation: high school students who are musicians, social media influencers or artists, already have the right to earn compensation for their work. Until now, in Ohio, there was only one group barred from the same opportunity: high school athletes.
That inequity has now been addressed.
This evolution is not about professionalizing high school sports, nor is it about introducing outside pressure. It is about respecting the basic economic freedom of students who have worked hard and built influence, whether that influence is athletic, artistic or digital.
Luke Fedlam is a partner and co-chair of the Entertainment, Sports and Media Practice at Amundsen Davis law firm.
He advises athletes and their families, providing guidance in education, legal protection and long-term planning in the Name, Image and Likeness (NIL) era.

Luke Fedlam is a partner and co-chair of the entertainment, sports and media practice at Amundsen Davis.
NIL
Barnhart Rips Narrative That Kentucky Lacks NIL Resources: “Ridiculous”
It was a celebration of Kentucky football when Will Stein was introduced to Big Blue Nation. Once the press conference ended, Mitch Barnhart took questions from the media. If you thought they had plenty of fireworks when Stein walked up to the stage, wait till you see what Mitch had to say.
Mitch has had “Enough” of Questions about NIL
Will Stein comes from Oregon, the home of Phil Knight and Nike. Their roster-building war chest is large. How does Kentucky’s look?
It’s a fair question, especially since the Wildcats moved all NIL Collective efforts in-house under the JMI umbrella. Barnhart and JMI’s Paul Archey shared why they are doing it, but have not explained how it will work. It’s a question Mitch Barnhart did not want to hear.
“We’re confident in what we’re doing. People ask that question 19 different ways with all that stuff that’s been going on, and it’s exhausting. Enough. Enough about, ‘Have we got enough?’ We’ve got enough. And we’re working at it just like everyone else is working at it,” said the Kentucky athletics director.
“We’re no different than everybody. We’ve got JMI. They’ve got Learfield. They’ve got Learfield. We’ve got JMI. They’ve got Learfield. They’ve got PlayFly. This notion that we don’t have enough is ridiculous.”
Barnhart continued: “We’ve got enough. We got to resource it the right way. We got to assess talent the right way. We got to acquire it the right way, and we got to make sure we’re within the boundaries of the rules. We’re not going to break the rules. That’s flat-out, we’re not doing that. We will do it the right way, we don’t need to do that, we’re good enough at what we do, we’ve got good people. That’s why we hired this guy; he’s really smart. He’s put together a really good gameplan of how they’re going to do it and on the first day they’ve made some really nice adjustments to what we’re doing, and we’ll be fine. That notion, all this nonsense that’s been created, by a variety of places, we don’t have enough or we’re not working at it, it’s gotta stop. That’s enough.”
Rules. What rules? The biggest criticism of Kentucky’s in-house NIL move is that it falls under rules that are not being enforced. Lawsuits were filed to ensure NIL Collectives could maintain business as usual, even after the House settlement passed. Those rules could only be enforced if the SCORE Act. Congress was supposed to vote on it today, but you’ll never guess, it was postponed.
Barnhart: General Managers are just “Semantics”
On Wednesday afternoon, a report confirmed some Drew Franklin scoop. Former Oregon director of recruiting Pat Biondo will serve as Stein’s general manager. When KSR asked the new Kentucky head coach how the front office would be structured, Stein essentially described Biondo as the budget balancer. Barnhart had a different description of the general manager position.
“I think it’s just semantics. General manager, player personnel, talent acquisition coordinator, I’ve heard all that stuff. There’s 19 different titles out there. The structure, it all comes down to the same thing. It comes down to talent evaluation, talent acquisition, and putting things in place that legally allow you to compete,” said Barnhart.
“All this notion that coaches aren’t controlling their rosters and they’re not making decisions, it’s ridiculous. At the end of the day, the coach is going to put in that program who he wants to put in that program to make plays. Period. Or he’s not going to be the coach very long. If he’s allowing someone to sit down the hallway and make those decisions for him, he will not be the coach very long. So it has to be integrated. It has to work together. It will work together for us.”
Barnhart says Stoops was “Great” During Final Conversations
Today would not have happened if Mark Stoops was unwilling to negotiate his buyout and allow it to be paid over time, rather than in 60 days. The way Barnhart tells it, Stoops might’ve still had a job if Kentucky won one more game this season.
“I don’t want to get into all of that, other than to say we were still competing for postseason play the last two weeks of the season, and that was important for this team to have an opportunity to do that and for us to have an opportunity to move forward,” said the Kentucky athletics director.
Barnhart commended the way Stoops carried himself and the success he had during his tenure at Kentucky. However, he got riled up and said it “irritates the snot” out of him when people criticize the former Kentucky football coach.
“I want to focus for Mark on the eight years he gave us in that middle stretch where we went to eight straight bowl games, and 10-8-10 (win) run that we had in the middle that was spectacular. We hadn’t seen that ever here. People all get hung up on the very beginning when it was a struggle, and he inherited a program that was really, really difficult, and they want to get hung up on the end, where it was a struggle, and we weren’t doing what we wanted to do. Forgetting the middle, where he absolutely gave this program a new set of boundaries, moved the goalposts for us — you can call it whatever you want to call it — he raised expectations. It’s what this place needed here.”
Barnhart continued: “So let’s not get hung up on what he didn’t do. He did a lot. That really irritates the snot out of me when people take shots. He was GREAT on Sunday, spectacular. He’s a good man and has a lot of love for this program and this city. Don’t ever walk out of here thinking I don’t have an unbelievable amount of respect for Mark Stoops and what he did here. We all need to be grateful for what he did. He did change expectations here.”
NIL
Highest Paid College Football Coaches After Lane Kiffin’s New LSU Contract
Former Ole Miss Rebels coach Lane Kiffin has stolen headlines across the country after recently accepting the LSU Tigers head position. This was before even his group out in Oxford with an 11-1 record even heard what seed they would receive in the College Football Playoff. Kiffin will not coach the team in the postseason, but instead prepare for the future in Baton Rouge.
Where does Oregon Ducks coach Dan Lanning rank alongside Kiffin, the rest of the SEC, the Big Ten Conference, and one name in the Atlantic Coast Conference? Here are the Top 10 highest-paid active head coaches in the sport of college football by annual salary.

No. 1 – Georgia Bulldogs coach Kirby Smart ($13.28 million)
No. 2 – LSU Tigers coach Lane Kiffin ($13 million)
No. 3 – Ohio State Buckeyes coach Ryan Day ($12.58 million)
No. 4 – Indiana Hoosiers coach Curt Cignetti ($11.6 million)
No. 5 – USC Trojans coach Lincoln Riley ($11.54 million)
No. 6 – Clemson Tigers coach Dabo Swinney ($11.45 million)
No. 7 – Texas Longhorns coach Steve Sarkisian ($10.8 million)
No. 8 – Missouri Tigers coach Eli Drinkwitz ($10.75 million)
No. 9 – Oregon Ducks coach Dan Lanning ($10.6 million)
No. 10 – Alabama Crimson Tide coach Kalen DeBoer ($10.25 million)
The SEC leads the way with five coaches on this list, the Big Ten trailing right behind at four, and the ACC with just one.
Being now known as the ‘villain’ of college football, 50-year-old Kiffin is embarking on his fifth collegiate head-coaching job. He started with the Tennessee Volunteers in 2009, USC from 2010-13, Florida Atlantic Owls from 2017-19, and Ole Miss from 2020-25.
Kiffin signed a seven-year contract with LSU worth $91 million. The deal includes an escalator that would make him the highest-paid coach if he wins a national championship and a clause where the Tigers’ athletic department will pay Kiffin bonuses he would have earned from the Rebels’ playoff appearance. The contract also includes an 80 percent buyout if he is fired without cause.

MORE: Internal and External Candidates Who Could Replace Oregon’s Will Stein
MORE: What Bo Nix’s Comments Reveal About Marcus Mariota’s Reputation
MORE: Impact Of Oregon Ducks Losing Offensive Coordinator Will Stein To Kentucky
SIGN UP FOR OUR NEWSLETTER HERE!
Oregon’s Dan Lanning Commitment To Ducks
As for Lanning, Oregon is his first job at the top of the helm. He has made an immediate splash over the last four seasons from 2022-25. The only 39-year-old has never had fewer than 10 wins and currently has an overall record of 46-7 (the exact same record that Chip Kelly had in his first four seasons with the Ducks).
With his fourth straight 10-win season in 2025, Lanning received a contract incentive through the university’s athletic department that pushes his deal through the 2031 season.

After winning the 2024 Big Ten championship and receiving a first-round bye in last season’s College Football Playoff, Lanning dreams much bigger of making a national powerhouse in Eugene. The program is still aiming for the school’s first national title.
In an exclusive interview with Oregon Ducks on SI reporter Bri Amaranthus, Lanning opened up about his commitment to Oregon and he didn’t shy away from addressing speculation.
“I’m not going anywhere. So I don’t spend a lot of time on ‘what ifs.’ I think it speaks to what we’ve done here as a program and what we’ve been able to build,” Lanning told Amaranthus before the 2025 season. “It’s a really special place. But to know that I’m really comfortable exactly where I’m at and where we’re going to be, is just as important to me.”
“(Oregon) made a commitment to me. They gave me an opportunity here that no one else gave me that opportunity. They gave me a chance to be the head coach here, and that’s something I want to see through,” Lanning continued.
No. 6 Oregon (11-1, 8-1 Big Ten) unofficially secured a spot in the upcoming postseason and now awaits to hear its name officially called at the selection show on Sunday, Dec. 7, at 9 a.m. ET on ESPN.
NIL
Scott Frost: ‘College football is broken’ amid NIL, revshare abuse
UCF head coach Scott Frost didn’t hold back when asked how much the recruiting landscape has changed in recent years.
“It’s broken,” Frost said bluntly during his National Signing Day press conference on Wednesday. “College football’s broken. Yeah, I don’t know if you’ll get that honest answer from everyone, but everyone would agree if they were honest.”
That candid assessment came as Frost shared his frustration over the widening gap between schools that abide by emerging revshare frameworks—and those that appear determined to circumvent them through guaranteed NIL promises, even after signing the CSC (College Sports Commission) participation agreement meant to prevent it.
LSU’s widely publicized hire of Lane Kiffin, which included reports of $10 to $15 million in annual NIL guarantees in addition to revshare compensation, is one recent example. Another is BYU’s contract extension of Kalani Sitake, which similarly promised a stacked NIL war chest on top of base revenue share.

“That’s baffling to me,” Frost said. “We’re going to sign participation agreements saying we’re not going to do any of that, and then have newspaper articles come out about how much you’re guaranteed to spend over revshare.
“So, you know, there’s no bigger fan of the people trying to put guardrails around this than me and us. And honestly, mostly because it’s best for college football if this gets under control.”
CSC aims to formalize oversight—but will it stick?
Frost was referring to the College Sports Commission, a regulatory body created to bring order and consistency to the evolving NIL and revshare ecosystem. Schools that opt into CSC agree to subject themselves to formal oversight, allowing the organization to monitor and investigate NIL transactions, revenue-sharing audits, and compliance with emerging regulations. That would give CSC the authority to not only review and reject deals, but also impose penalties on schools that engage in blatant rule-breaking.
The CSC’s enforcement capabilities are designed to go well beyond toothless warnings. Under its charter, the group could levy fines, suspend NIL privileges, and take other disciplinary actions against members who violate the rules. The intent is to create a framework where all programs operate under the same standards, something that has largely been missing during the early years of NIL and player compensation.
In theory, participation in CSC would bring much-needed transparency to how schools structure NIL and revshare offers. But in practice, Frost and others remain concerned that enforcement is inconsistent, with some programs openly ignoring the terms of the agreement while continuing to benefit in recruiting. Without meaningful oversight, Frost fears the imbalance will only worsen.
“You know, any sport where whoever has the richest boosters wins—that’s not a good model for a sport,” Frost said. “So we’re rooting for it to get curtailed. In the meantime, we’ve got to try to do the best we can.”
UCF’s strategy: Culture, compliance, and a long game
Despite the inequities, Frost was quick to credit UCF Athletics Director Terry Mohajir and general manager Trent Mossbrucker for building a stable infrastructure that allows the Knights to compete with integrity.
“Terry and people here have done an unbelievable job getting us on a level playing field with everybody else from a revshare standpoint,” Frost said. “That gives us a great chance. We need to keep pushing forward and trying to do even more.”
Compared to this time last year, when Frost had barely met his players and was blindsided by immediate NIL demands, he believes UCF is in a much stronger position.
“I laugh about it now, but I did my press conference last year and had a couple players and their agents waiting outside my office five minutes after I did my press conference to start telling me how much money I needed to pay them, and I didn’t even know who the kids were,” he said.
“We’re going to know our team now. We’re going to know our strengths and weaknesses. I think we’re at a better financial position to approach this, and hopefully we’ll build around some people rather than try to build the whole thing from scratch.”
Impact on high school recruiting, development and loyalty
Frost also lamented the erosion of long-term player development and loyalty, two cornerstones of what used to define the college football experience.
“The days of going to a school and being loyal to the school and being able to go back to homecomings and support a school that you were at for four or five years… some kids will never have that because they’ve been at three or four schools,” Frost said.
“One of the things that I think a lot of coaches love about coaching is the mentoring side of it… That’s getting harder and harder to do. The time frame that you have to impact some guys can be a lot shorter now.”
Instead of a multi-year developmental arc, college football is now largely a year-to-year rebuild, with teams scrambling each offseason to reassemble a roster from the portal, recruiting classes, and returning players. Frost believes UCF is better suited for that challenge in Year 2, with stronger culture keepers in the locker room and a clearer understanding of roster needs.
“You’ve got to build a team and a team culture year by year now,” he said. “The good thing for us is we’re going to have a lot of guys that understand what we want and our standards. And when you have culture keepers in the locker room that hold everybody else to the standard, that’s a big piece.”
SIGN UP: Join the UCFSports.com Community for $1
Join the message board discussion with diehard UCF fans in The Dungeon
NIL
More NIL Donors Should Take A Page Out Of Dave Portnoy’s Book
Good to see someone being sensible about the money being thrown at teenagers in college football.
If Barstool founder Dave Portnoy being measured about NIL was on your Bingo card for 2025, then congratulations, but for the rest of you, I’m sure you’re just as shocked as I am.
For the uninitiated, Portnoy, being a massive Michigan fan, was instrumental in the Wolverines landing five-star quarterback Bryce Underwood last year.
Since then, however, it’s been anything but smooth sailing.
Underwood has been a solid player as a freshman, but nothing like the superstar many thought he would be, prompting even Portnoy himself to voice his displeasure at times with his “investment” on X.
Not exactly glowing remarks from El Pres!
It gets even crazier, as now, Portnoy has publicly stated he’s not about to get into a bidding war for Underwood, and if another team comes along and poaches him or the young signal caller asks for more money, Davey Pagviews is ready to let him walk.
“I’m out of it. He’d have to have some big balls to say he wants to renegotiate now,“ Portnoy said during an appearance on The Triple Option podcast. “I don’t think that’s coming down the ‘pike. That would be surreal.”
I’ve had my gripes with Portnoy in the past, but he’s spot on here.
If we learned anything from the Nico Iamaleava situation, it’s that you can’t let one player hold an entire program hostage.
Yes, landing Underwood on signing day last year was a coup for Michigan, and it gave them a surge in momentum to land another five-star, Andrew Babalola, in the process.
But if Underwood’s output for the season makes him think he’s entitled to a raise, then I might as well march into my boss’s office right now and ask for one too!
More donors should follow Portnoy’s lead.
Paying players for mediocrity is not the answer, and the sooner we start to see boosters put their feet down, the sooner we will see an end to these insane “contracts” being given out to freshmen who haven’t proven a lick yet.
The going rate for a five-star football player at a premium position (quarterback, left tackle, edge rusher) is staggering.
Maybe Portnoy’s admission is the first step to the market correcting itself, because Lord knows this system is anything but sustainable.
-
Rec Sports1 week agoFirst Tee Winter Registration is open
-
Rec Sports1 week agoFargo girl, 13, dies after collapsing during school basketball game – Grand Forks Herald
-
Sports2 weeks agoVolleyball Recaps – November 18
-
Motorsports1 week agoCPG Brands Like Allegra Are Betting on F1 for the First Time
-
Motorsports2 weeks agoF1 Las Vegas: Verstappen win, Norris and Piastri DQ tighten 2025 title fight
-
Sports1 week agoTwo Pro Volleyball Leagues Serve Up Plans for Minnesota Teams
-
Sports1 week agoUtah State Announces 2025-26 Indoor Track & Field Schedule
-
Sports1 week agoTexas volleyball vs Kentucky game score: Live SEC tournament updates
-
Sports1 week agoSycamores unveil 2026 track and field schedule
-
Motorsports1 week agoRedemption Means First Pro Stock World Championship for Dallas Glenn





