Connect with us
https://yoursportsnation.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/call-to-1.png

NIL

Men's college basketball Top 25 reset

Now that the NBA Draft withdrawal deadline for college players has passed and only one unsigned player remains in our top 100 transfers list, most rosters are set for the 2025-26 men’s college basketball season. That means it’s time to hit refresh on my top 25. It’s no longer a dart-throwing exercise. Except for perhaps […]

Published

on

Men's college basketball Top 25 reset

Now that the NBA Draft withdrawal deadline for college players has passed and only one unsigned player remains in our top 100 transfers list, most rosters are set for the 2025-26 men’s college basketball season.

That means it’s time to hit refresh on my top 25. It’s no longer a dart-throwing exercise. Except for perhaps a few late international signings, this ranking may be nearly identical to the one I submit right before the season.

Advertisement

In an effort to avoid groupthink, I did not look at any other human rankings, but once I had a top 25 set, I did browse Bart Torvik’s list, which is the one computerized data set that has already published rankings for next season. Out of my top 25 teams, 22 appear in Torvik’s top 25. That made me feel pretty good about this list.

So if you vehemently disagree with me, be prepared to also yell at the computers.

1. Purdue

Projected starters: Braden Smith, Omer Mayer (freshman), Fletcher Loyer, Trey Kaufman-Renn, Oscar Cluff (transfer)
Notable returners: C.J. Cox, Daniel Jacobsen, Gicarri Harris, Raleigh Burgess
Other newcomers: Liam Murphy (transfer), Antione West

One coach told me Omer Mayer was the steal of the international signings, and his performance at the Nike Hoops Summit backed that up. Mayer could start at point guard right now for any team in America. He just happens to be going to the one team that returns the best point guard in college basketball, but I’m convinced he and Braden Smith can coexist. Mayer will allow Smith to get some rest; Purdue’s best team of Smith’s first three years running point had Lance Jones as a secondary handler.

Oscar Cluff and Daniel Jacobsen should help address Purdue’s ’24-25 shortcomings: two-point defense and rebounding. The offense was already championship-level good; if the defense can be top-20ish, the Boilermakers will back up this preseason expectation.

2. Houston

Projected starters: Milos Uzan, Emanuel Sharp, Isiah Harwell (freshman), Chris Cenac Jr. (freshman), Joseph Tugler
Other returners: Mercy Miller, Ramon Walker, Cedric Lath
Other newcomers: Kingston Flemings, Bryce Jackson, Kalifa Sakho (transfer)

Kelvin Sampson has had a freshman in his regular starting lineup in only three of his 11 seasons as Houston’s head coach. He’s never had two. But this is arguably the best freshman class Sampson has ever landed: No. 2 in the country, per 247Sports, behind only Duke. It’s tough to bet against the Coogs because of the three veterans in the starting lineup. Joseph Tugler is a defensive player of the year frontrunner; Emanuel Sharp is one of the nation’s best shooters; Milos Uzan was one of the best point guards in the country down the stretch this spring.

Advertisement

The Coogs will miss LJ Cryer’s shotmaking, but we say that every year about a departing Houston guard, and someone inevitably fills that void. Uzan’s decision to withdraw from the draft was a stabilizer. If Houston had to rely on a freshman at point guard or try to play Pop Isaacs (now at Texas A&M) away from his natural position, its outlook would be a lot less certain. If the freshmen can adjust quickly, the defensive possibilities for this group are pretty scary.

3. UConn

Projected starters: Silas Demary Jr. (transfer), Solo Ball, Jaylin Stewart, Alex Karaban, Tarris Reed
Notable returners: Jayden Ross
Other newcomers: Malachi Smith (transfer), Braylon Mullins, Darius Adams, Eric Reibe, Jacob Furphy (international), Jacob Ross

In 2022 the Huskies returned two starters and three of the top seven scorers from a team that won 23 games and lost in the first round of the NCAA Tournament, then landed a 6-foot-5 point guard out of the transfer portal and won a title. The 2025-26 Huskies return two starters and four of the top seven scorers from a team that won 24 games and made the second round of the NCAA Tournament. They landed a 6-foot-5 point guard out of the transfer portal. Will the end result be the same?

It’s not hard to see who slots into each role on the ’22-23 champs. Solo Ball could be the Jordan Hawkins, a gifted shooter ready to become one of the nation’s best shooting guards. Tarris Reed is capable of carrying the offense like Adama Sanogo could. This year’s UConn has a gifted freshman backup center in Eric Reibe; the original model was Donovan Clingan. The ’22-23 champs had Alex Karaban; this team has (an older) Alex Karaban. And then Georgia transfer Silas Demary Jr. seems like the ideal fit to play the Tristen Newton role. I’m not sure Jaylin Stewart can match Andre Jackson, and Reibe might be further along offensively but won’t have Clingan’s defensive impact, but you could argue the rest of the cast of characters are equals. Last year was a rebuilding season, but I’m betting this group is ready to win now that the core has had time to marinate.

4. Michigan

Projected starters: Elliot Cadeau (transfer), Nimari Burnett, Yaxel Lendeborg (transfer), Morez Johnson (transfer), Aday Mara (transfer)
Notable returners: LJ Cason, Roddy Gayle, Will Tschetter
Other newcomers: Trey McKenney, Winters Grady, Patrick Liburd

Advertisement

Michigan was really good defensively last year and has a chance to be elite after the work Dusty May did in the portal. Per CBB Analytics, the former teams of the three bigs Michigan added were all significantly better with them on the floor last season: Aday Mara (UCLA was 7.6 points per 100 possessions better), Morez Johnson (Illinois, 11 points per 100 possessions better) and Yaxel Lendeborg (UAB, 6.2 points per 100 possessions better). Mara would have had the highest block percentage in the country had he played enough to qualify for the KenPom.com leaderboard. It’s going to be difficult to score in the paint with so much positional size and Mara protecting the basket.

The stat sheet-stuffing Lendeborg is versatile enough for Michigan to play the three bigs together. Shooting will be the biggest concern. The Wolverines shot just 33.2 percent from deep last season and replaced one of their best shooters (Tre Donaldson) with a point guard (Elliot Cadeau) whom opposing defenses mostly ignore beyond the arc, but freshman Trey McKenney should help. He’s one of the most game-ready freshman guards in the country. Cadeau’s passing should also help an offense that struggled with turnovers. May has depth at every spot, experience and lineup versatility that should allow the Wolverines to match up with anybody.

5. Florida

Projected starters: Boogie Fland (transfer), Xaivian Lee (transfer), Thomas Haugh, Alex Condon, Rueben Chinyelu
Notable returners: Micah Handlogten, Urban Klavzar
Other newcomers: Alex Lloyd, CJ Ingram, AJ Brown (transfer)

Big is back: Last season’s best teams had positional size and elite paint protection. Florida could play a giant lineup that features Thomas Haugh (6-9), Alex Condon (6-11) and Rueben Chinyelu (6-10) up front. Those three played together only three possessions last season, per CBB Analytics, but it’ll be hard to justify bringing one of them off the bench, considering Haugh’s performance in the NCAA Tournament and the inexperience of the other wing options. That big lineup could also help mask some defensive limitations of Boogie Fland and Xaivian Lee.

Florida’s up-tempo style should help Fland prove he can be a more efficient player than he was under John Calipari. The Gators will contend for another title if Fland and Lee are productive and if Haugh and Condon continue to gain confidence in their playmaking and scoring abilities. They’ll be expected to perform more like stars and take some of the heat off perimeter guys who cannot be expected to replicate the production of Walter Clayton.

6. Louisville

Projected starters: Mikel Brown Jr. (freshman), Ryan Conwell (transfer), Isaac McKneely (transfer), Sananda Fru (international), Kasean Pryor
Notable returners: J’Vonne Hadley, Khani Rooths
Other newcomers: Adrian Wooley (transfer), Mouhamed Camara (international), Vangelis Zougris (international)

Current projections have Aly Khalifa off the roster because the NCAA has ruled he’s run out his five-year eligibility clock, but I’m betting Khalifa is eventually allowed to play, whether it’s through appeal or a future lawsuit. He’s one of the best passing bigs in the country and would be the perfect hub in Pat Kelsey’s offense. Without him, Louisville still has some fun options up front with Kasean Pryor, who was looking like one of Louisville’s best players before his injury last year, and 21-year-old German big Sananda Fru, who should be ready to contribute right away.

Advertisement

Ryan Conwell was one of the best guards in the Big East last season, Isaac McKneely is a knockdown shooter and capable of scoring some off the bounce, and Adrian Wooley is one of the highest-upside guards in the portal. The Cards also have a five-star point guard in Mikel Brown Jr. This is one of the most talented rosters on paper, and Kelsey proved last year that he can get a bunch of hired guns to blend quickly.

7. BYU

Projected starters: Rob Wright (transfer), Kennard Davis (transfer), Richie Saunders, AJ Dybantsa (freshman), Keba Keita
Notable returners: Dawson Baker, Mihailo Boskovic
Other newcomers: Dominique Diomande (transfer), Xavion Staton, Chamberlain Burgess, Tyler Mrus (transfer), Nate Pickens (transfer)

Not all top-five recruits are created equal. Some years it’s Kevin Durant and Greg Oden. Some years it’s Isaiah Collier and Justin Edwards. This 2025 class — headlined by Darryn Peterson, AJ Dybantsa and Cameron Boozer — is expected to be one of those special classes. BYU is betting big on Dybantsa and has an elite big three with Dybantsa, Rob Wright (one of the best freshman point guards last season at Baylor) and first-team All-Big 12 honoree Richie Saunders. Center Keba Keita gives Wright a good pick-and-roll partner and elevates the defense. Mihailo Boskovic flashed high upside in his first season in the program. Dawson Baker is a solid sixth man who is good enough to start if Southern Illinois transfer guard Kennard Davis struggles with the level change. Anything else BYU gets from newcomers will be gravy.

Kevin Young seemed to find his groove as a college head coach about halfway through his first season. You never know how NBA guys will do at this level, but no one since Fred Hoiberg has made the move this seamlessly.

8. Duke

Projected starters: Caleb Foster, Isaiah Evans, Dame Sarr (international), Cameron Boozer (freshman), Patrick Ngongba
Notable returners: Darren Harris, Maliq Brown
Other newcomers: Cayden Boozer, Nikolas Khamenia, Sebastian Wilkins, Ifeanyl Ufochukwu (transfer)

Cameron Boozer is probably the surest bet of any incoming freshman. My worry for the Blue Devils is at point guard and on the defensive end. Duke was 19.3 points per 100 possessions worse with Caleb Foster on the floor last season, per CBB Analytics. Last year, guards Kon Knueppel and Sion James were so physical they could switch onto anyone. That won’t be the case with Isaiah Evans or Dame Sarr, although Sarr has the length and instincts to be a high-level defender. Cooper Flagg and Khaman Maluach could clean up a lot of mistakes inside. Boozer should be a solid defender, but he’s nowhere close to those two as a rim protector, and neither are Maliq Brown or Patrick Ngongba.

Jon Scheyer should be able to figure out how to make the offense work around Boozer. Sarr has lottery-level upside. Foster and Evans are the players who probably control the team’s floor and ceiling. Foster flopped in his first chance to be the starting point guard, and Cayden Boozer would be the backup plan.

Advertisement

Evans had a de facto warmup season this past year, when anything he provided was gravy. Maybe he turns into a star. Maybe he’s just a streaky shooter and not much more. The inexperience across the board is worrisome, but Duke’s bet on talent usually works out.

9. Kentucky

Projected starters: Jaland Lowe (transfer) Denzel Aberdeen (transfer), Otega Oweh, Andrija Jelavic (international), Jayden Quaintance (transfer)
Notable returners: Brandon Garrison, Collin Chandler, Trent Noah
Other newcomers: Mouhamed Dioubate (transfer), Kam Williams (transfer), Jasper Johnson, Malachi Moreno, Reece Potter (transfer), Braydon Hawthorne

This roster does not have the shooting of Mark Pope’s first Kentucky team, but it should be better defensively and have more playmaking on the perimeter. Pope showed in Year 1 that he can microwave chemistry. He’s also giving himself a ton of lineup options. Not only will there be position battles for starting jobs, but also Kentucky will have some talented players who struggle to even make the rotation.

I’m most intrigued by the frontcourt. Pope likes his bigs to be the playmaking hubs of his offense, and Andrija Jelavic, Mouhamed Dioubate and Jayden Quaintance are all intriguing options, though I’m not sure any of them can fully replace Amari Williams. Jelavic was a double-digit scorer for his professional club overseas, and Quaintance is considered a lottery-level prospect. He’ll have to beat out Brandon Garrison after recovering from a torn ACL.

You know what you’re going to get out of Otega Oweh and Florida transfer Denzel Aberdeen, who would have been a starter on most SEC teams last year. Pitt transfer Jaland Lowe is more of a true point guard than Lamont Butler, but he goes through spurts of inefficiency. If Lowe can be an all-league-caliber guard and one or two of the bigs can produce consistently, this could be a title contender.

10. Auburn

Projected starters: Tahaad Pettiford, Elyjah Freeman (transfer), Keyshawn Hall (transfer), Filip Jovic (Auburn), KeShawn Murphy (transfer)
Other newcomers: Kevin Overton (transfer), Abdul Bashir (juco transfer), Emeka Opurum (juco transfer), Sebastian Williams-Adams, Kaden Magwood, Simon Walker

Pettiford performed so well at the NBA Draft combine that it’s a little surprising he’s returning to school. And I like what Bruce Pearl did in the portal. He got a proven scorer in Keyshawn Hall. He got the perfect energy/defensive big man in KeShawn Murphy, who has already shown he can be a winning player in the SEC. Serbian big man Filip Jovic comes from the same pro league that produced Tomislav Ivisic and put up better scoring numbers. Elyjah Freeman is a high upside swing who comes from Division II but was on the radar of NBA folks at Lincoln Memorial University. Texas Tech transfer Kevin Overton is also a starter-level player, and Abdul Bashir, one of the top juco recruits in the country, is another upside swing.

Advertisement

Pettiford could be in for a usage increase that makes him a National Player of the Year candidate, and I’d bet on at least two of the other additions being consistent scorers. Defense is the concern, but Murphy should help solidify that end, and three of Pearl’s last four teams finished in the top 10 of adjusted defensive efficiency.

11. Illinois

Projected starters: Mihailo Petrovic (international), Kylan Boswell, Andrej Stojakovic (transfer), David Mirkovic (international), Tomislav Ivisic
Notable returners: Ben Humrichous, Ty Rodgers, Jake Davis
Other newcomers: Zvonimir Ivisic (transfer), Brandon Lee, Keaton Wagler

I cannot wait to see how the Balkan Illini come together. Head coach Brad Underwood decided a year ago to put most of his money toward international recruiting instead of top-line high schoolers or transfers, which gave him a head start with some of the top European prospects coming over this year. The headliner is Mihailo Petrovic, a 22-year-old point guard who was an MVP candidate in the Adriatic League, averaging 14.2 points and 7.3 assists playing against professionals. It’s the same league where the Ivisic brothers played before coming to the U.S., and Underwood went there to get likely starting power forward David Mirkovic as well. Andrej Stojakovic never played in the Adriatic League, but his dad, Peja, is from Croatia. Andrej averaged 17.9 points for a bad Cal team, but he’s meant to be the second or third or fourth option for the Illini.

Defense is a question mark, but this team is going to run beautiful offense. Next order of business: Nike needs to make this orange tracksuit for Underwood, and he must coach in it.

12. St. John’s

Projected starters: Dylan Darling (transfer) Ian Jackson (transfer), Joson Sanon (transfer), Bryce Hopkins (transfer), Zuby Ejiofor
Notable returners: Ruben Prey, Lefteris Liotopoulos
Other newcomers: Dillon Mitchell (transfer), Oziyah Sellers (transfer), Handje Tamba (transfer), Kelvin Odih, Imran Suljanovic

I wrote this in the offseason’s first top 25: “If Rick Pitino lands a stud guard, I’ll probably be inclined to move St. John’s into the top 10 because it’s Pitino.” Since then he’s landed Ian Jackson (averaged 11.9 points as a freshman at North Carolina), Dylan Darling (the Big Sky MVP at Idaho State) and Oziyah Sellers (averaged 13.7 points on a middle-of-the-pack ACC team at Stanford). Arizona State transfer Joson Sanon, who was already committed at the time of April’s top 25, is also a nice upside addition from a crummy team. None of the three high-major guys have contributed much to winning outfits, and even Darling was on a fourth-place Big Sky team, so I’m hesitant to move the Johnnies all the way into the top 10.

It’s also hard to assume Bryce Hopkins is going to be the Bryce Hopkins of his sophomore season at Providence. Hopkins has played four games since the beginning of 2024. Pitino did get some insurance by landing former Texas/Cincinnati forward Dillon Mitchell, who I think is a great fit for his defense. If Hopkins is healthy, it’s a top-10 frontcourt. It’s possible I’m underestimating Pitino, but I think I’d take the 2024-25 roster over this one.

Advertisement

13. Texas Tech

Projected starters: Christian Anderson, LeJuan Watts (transfer), Tyeree Bryan (transfer), JT Toppin, Luke Bamgboye (transfer)
Other newcomers: Donovan Atwell (transfer), Josiah Moseley (transfer), Nolan Groves

Christian Anderson played with the presence of a veteran as a freshman. JT Toppin will be a preseason All-American. Head coach Grant McCasland once again prioritized shooting, landing three wings who shot 39-plus percent from 3 last season — Tyeree Bryan and Donovan Atwell are proven specialists, while LeJuan Watts is more of an all-around guard. Luke Bamgboye is an elite rim protector, ranking second nationally in block rate as a freshman at VCU.

For an offense that tries to capitalize on mismatches, it was a blow to lose Darrion Williams to NC State, but Anderson-Toppin should be one of the best point guard-big combos in the country, and the shooters should give them space to work.

14. Gonzaga

Projected starters: Braeden Smith,Tyon Grant-Foster, Adam Miller, Braden Huff, Graham Ike
Notable returners: Steele Venters, Emmanuel Innocenti, Ismaila Diagne
Other newcomers: Jalen Warley (transfer), Davis Fogle, Parker Jefferson

Apologies to Gonzaga, which I mistakenly omitted on my last rankings because I overlooked fifth-year senior Graham Ike’s ability to come back for a sixth year. Ike played two years at Wyoming, sat out 2022-23 with an injury, then played the last two years. So four in five and done, right? Nope. He’s one of those rare players with an extra season left because his freshman season was the 2020-21 COVID-19 waiver year.

This roster is old. Adam Miller, who will play a fifth season in six years, will be a floor spacer. The Zags hope to welcome back 24-year-old sharpshooter Steele Venters, the 2023 Big Sky MVP who has missed the last two seasons — first with a torn ACL, then an Achilles tendon tear. Gonzaga brought in well-traveled 25-year-old Tyon Grant-Foster (Indiana Hills Community College to Kansas to DePaul to Grand Canyon and now to Gonzaga), who fits neatly in the bucket-getting role Khalif Battle held last season. Replacing Ryan Nembhard at point guard is Braeden Smith, the 2024 Patriot League Player of the Year who was the rare transfer willing to actually sit out a year, learning the Gonzaga way as Nembhard’s understudy.

So the Zags have a table setter, an elite wing scorer, a couple of old knockdown shooters and two elite post-up guys in Ike and Braden Huff, who will inevitably end up an All-American by the time he’s finished in Spokane. It’s possible I haven’t overcorrected enough on my previous mistake.

Advertisement

15. Kansas

Projected starters: Darryn Peterson (freshman), Elmarko Jackson, Jayden Dawson (transfer), Tre White (transfer), Flory Bidunga
Notable returners: Bryson Tiller, Jamari McDowell
Other newcomers: Melvin Council (transfer), Samis Calderon

Bill Self told me recently that Kansas was one 14-15-point scorer away from having what he felt was a complete team. The Jayhawks missed on two targets for that spot in Darrion Williams (NC State) and Dame Sarr (Duke). There isn’t much left in the transfer portal, so Self could either go shopping overseas or just go with what he has and try to find at least one more big body for depth up front.

Self built this roster with “fit rather than talent” in mind, but he has a surefire pro in Darryn Peterson, who is expected to be one of the top picks in the 2026 draft. Self says Peterson is the “most prepared high school kid” he’s signed at Kansas — high praise considering Self has coached Andrew Wiggins, Joel Embiid and multiple other one-and-done lottery picks.

Self wisely signed transfers who can either stretch the floor (Jayden Dawson) or put pressure on the rim with their speed (Melvin Council). Freshman forward Bryson Tiller will need to be ready to play right away. But this team is built to be disruptive defensively, and if Peterson lives up to the hype and guys like Flory Bidunga and Elmarko Jackson develop, KU has enough talent to be a Big 12 contender again.

16. Iowa State

Projected starters: Tamin Lipsey, Dominick Nelson (transfer), Milan Momcilovic, Joshua Jefferson, Blake Buchanan (transfer)
Notable returners: Nate Heise
Other newcomers: Eric Mulder (transfer), Mason Williams (transfer), Jamarion Batemon, Killyan Toure, Xzavion Mitchell, Dominykas Pleta

The Clones struggled down the stretch when Keshon Gilbert was out, and Curtis Jones had to go nuclear for the offense to thrive. The good news is that T.J. Otzelberger has nailed the up-transfer market, and Utah Valley’s Dominick Nelson and Eastern Washington’s Mason Williams are the next guys who really need to hit. Even if they aren’t go-to scorers, the offense could be really good if Joshua Jefferson and Milan Momcilovic continue to improve.

The defense did slip slightly last year — from first to 13th in adjusted efficiency — and that’s in part because Iowa State wasn’t as physical and deep up front. But the Clones are never going to slip far with Tamin Lipsey at the head of the attack. Otzelberger has a formula that seems to keep working, and returning three starters from a NCAA Tournament team is a great foundation.

Advertisement

17. Arkansas

Projected starters: Darius Acuff Jr. (freshman), DJ Wagner, Karter Knox, Trevon Brazile, Malique Ewin (transfer)
Notable returners: Billy Richmond
Other newcomers: Karim Rtail (international), Nick Pringle (transfer), Meleek Thomas, Isaiah Sealy

This core should enter the season with some confidence after a surprise Sweet 16 run. John Calipari has a good mix of size, speed and guards who can get their own buckets. The concern is that this group leans into that last category too much and the offense looks disjointed, a common flaw of Calipari’s worst teams. Hope for a more cohesive approach comes with the addition of Malique Ewin, assuming the Florida State transfer gets used correctly. Ewin is a perfect fit for an SEC in which the best teams all have playmaking centers.

The defense could be elite with so much positional size. Arkansas played its best after Calipari made Trevon Brazile a starter late in the year, and pairing him with Ewin allows Arkansas to play five-out and take advantage of its team speed. It could be another up-and-down season, but as we saw this past year, once the talent figures out how to coexist, the ceiling is pretty high.

18. UCLA

Projected starters: Donovan Dent (transfer), Skyy Clark, Eric Dailey, Tyler Bilodeau, Xavier Booker (transfer)
Notable returners: Trent Perry
Other newcomers: Steven Jamerson (transfer), Jamar Brown (transfer)

The Bruins haven’t had a true point guard since Tyger Campbell. He was the last UCLA player to post an assist rate higher than 30 percent, in 2021; that’s also the last time UCLA made the Final Four. Top-shelf transfer Donovan Dent has had a plus-30 assist rate in each of his last two seasons at New Mexico.

Head coach Mick Cronin’s best teams usually play elite defense and execute his sets, and it feels like Dent should help in both areas. The Bruins welcome back three starters (Eric Dailey, Tyler Bilodeau and Skyy Clark) who transferred in a year ago and were efficient in Cronin’s system. The wild card is Michigan State transfer Xavier Booker, a former five-star recruit who never seemed to live up to the hype. He seems like an odd fit for Cronin, but maybe a change of scenery will unlock his potential.

19. Arizona

Projected starters: Jaden Bradley, Brayden Burries (freshman), Anthony Dell’Orso, Koa Peat (freshman), Motiejus Krivas
Other returners: Tobe Awaka
Other newcomers: Evan Nelson (transfer), Dwayne Aristode, Bryce James

Advertisement

Arizona brings in 247Sports’ No. 3 high school signing class and will likely throw its two five-stars (Brayden Burries and Koa Peat) into the starting lineup. Peat brings playmaking and athleticism to the frontcourt, and Burries’ ability to score is going to be critical with the graduation of Caleb Love. The Cats also need a breakout season from Motiejus Krivas, who played only eight games in 2024-25 because of a foot injury. The Wildcats lost Henri Veesaar to North Carolina after a breakout season, but when healthy, Krivas has always beaten Veesaar out. He and Tobe Awaka could make Arizona one of the best offensive rebounding teams in the country.

The Wildcats showed flashes of elite defense last year but never really leaned into that strength. For this team to hit its ceiling, defense will need to be a calling card, helping the offense get out in transition, where Jaden Bradley and Peat excel. Like Sampson at Houston, head coach Tommy Lloyd prioritized his high school class rather than loading up in the portal. With the COVID-19 waiver year mostly phased out of college basketball, it’ll be interesting to see whether more top-tier programs start to prioritize freshmen again. It worked out well for Duke this spring.

20. North Carolina

Projected starters: Kyan Evans (transfer), Seth Trimble, Luka Bogavac (international), Caleb Wilson (freshman), Henri Veesaar (transfer)
Other newcomers: Jarin Stevenson (transfer), Jonathan Powell (transfer), Jaydon Young (transfer), Derek Dixon, Isaiah Denis

Head coach Hubert Davis whiffed on his front line a year ago, and that’s where most of UNC’s offseason budget went. Caleb Wilson and Veesaar bring a little more scoring but a lot more defensive skill to the front line. Wilson is long, quick-twitch and switchable — not quite a young Anthony Davis, but in that mold. Veesaar is also an elite rim protector; Arizona’s defense was 10.5 points per 100 possessions better with him on the floor last season, per CBB Analytics. The Tar Heels have the positional size to start 6-foot-11 Jarin Stevenson at the three. Worst-case scenario, he’s a backup to Wilson as a stretch four; best case, he continues to emerge as an NBA prospect.

With RJ Davis graduating, UNC also addressed the need for shooting in the portal by adding Colorado State point guard Kyan Evans (44.6 percent from 3) and West Virginia guard Jonathan Powell (35.2 percent). Freshman guard Derek Dixon, a good shooter who always plays under control, was one of my favorite players on the EYBL circuit. The Tar Heels are missing a dynamic scorer on the perimeter and will need to score more through execution, but the pieces fit.

21. Michigan State

Projected starters: Jeremy Fears, Trey Fort (transfer), Coen Carr, Jaxon Kohler, Carson Cooper
Notable returners: Jesse McCulloch
Other newcomers: Cam Ward, Jordan Scott, Kaleb Glenn (transfer), Divine Ugochukwu (transfer)

Coen Carr as the starting small forward could cause some spacing issues and make a crummy 3-point shooting team even crummier, but head coach Tom Izzo does not give a damn about your analytics. The Spartans are going to guard and play fast, and we all need more chances to see Carr punishing rims.

Advertisement

But yeah … the shooting. It’s a worry. Izzo at least addressed it in the portal by grabbing Trey Fort (37.9 percent from 3 at Samford) and Kaleb Glenn (41 percent at Florida Atlantic). I’m not sure I buy Glenn as a 40 percent 3-point shooter, but he deserves credit for drastically improving in that area after going 1 of 9 from deep as a freshman at Louisville. Ideally, this team would have been a preseason top-10 outfit led by a sophomore Jase Richardson, but Richardson was too good too fast. Now the Spartans will need to win by guarding, running and playing through the bigs. Old-school Izzo.

22. Creighton

Projected starters: Nik Graves (transfer), Josh Dix (transfer), Blake Harper (transfer), Jackson McAndrew, Owen Freeman (transfer)
Notable returners: Jasen Green, Isaac Traudt
Other newcomers: Hudson Greer, Austin Swartz (transfer)

Josh Dix and Owen Freeman should be the best two players on this team, and it is worth pointing out both spent last year on an Iowa team that won only seven games in the Big Ten. (The Hawkeyes were 4-6 in conference play before Freeman was lost for the year. Not great, but not awful!) So why am I high on Creighton? One, I think Dix can be one of the best wings in the country. Two, in Gregg McDermott I trust.

McDermott landed another talented wing in Blake Harper, who averaged 19.5 points per game as a freshman at Howard. Jackson McAndrew made 69 3s as a freshman, and Nik Graves made 61 last season at Charlotte. Hudson Greer is one of the better shooting wings in the 2025 class. The “let it fly” Bluejays will be back, which should give Freeman, an elite back-to-the-basket scorer, plenty of room to operate. The Jays are going to really miss Ryan Kalkbrenner, especially on defense, but give McDermott this much offensive talent, and he’s going to figure it out.

23. Alabama

Projected starters: Labaron Philon, Aden Holloway, Latrell Wrightsell, Taylor Bol Bowen (transfer), Aiden Sherrell
Notable returners: Houston Mallette
Other newcomers: Jalil Bethea (transfer), London Jemison, Davion Hannah, Amari Allen, Noah Williamson (transfer), Keitenn Bristow (transfer)

I had Alabama out of the first version of these rankings, under the assumption Labaron Philon was going to stay in the NBA Draft — he’d previously said he was “all in.” I was underwhelmed by Alabama’s transfer haul, and Nate Oats lost a ton of production off last year’s roster, though he still had shooting. And I might have been onto something, considering Bart Torvik’s ratings have Bama at 38. But I love, love, love Philon, and his reentry into the lineup changes the equation.

Philon’s presence takes some pressure off Aden Holloway, and his ability to live in the paint should help set up the shooters. Aiden Sherrell needs to make a leap, but he could be dangerous if he makes enough shots to stretch defenses. The other option at the five is Patriot League Player of the Year Noah Williamson, but I think he’s going to have a tough time matching high-major speed and athleticism. Maybe one of Alabama’s freshmen is way better than expected, as Philon was a year ago. Oats probably deserves the benefit of the doubt, but this appears to be a drop-off in talent from his last two rosters.

Advertisement

24. Missouri

Projected starters: Anthony Robinson, Sebastian Mack (transfer), Trent Pierce, Mark Mitchell, Jevon Porter (transfer)
Notable returners: Jacob Crews, Trent Burns, TO Barrett, Annor Boateng
Other newcomers: Shawn Phillips (transfer), Jayden Stone (transfer), Luke Northweather (transfer), Aaron Rowe, Nicholas Randall

Missouri returns three starters from a Top 25 team. I was a big fan of Sebastian Mack a few years ago on the EYBL circuit, and while he was solid at UCLA, it feels like he has the potential to be more productive in a high-tempo system like Mizzou’s. He should fit nicely in the Tony Perkins role. Jacob Crews should elevate from the second shooter off the bench to take Caleb Grill’s sixth-man spot.

The Tigers’ ceiling could be determined by the productivity of Jevon Porter and Trent Burns at center. Porter, the little brother of former Tigers Michael and Jontay, averaged double figures for three seasons in the West Coast Conference. The 7-foot-5 Burns, who redshirted as a freshman, can step out and hit a 3. To borrow an old Fran Fraschilla line, he could be a year away from being a year away, but he’s a fascinating prospect.

Dennis Gates got frontcourt reinforcements from Arizona State transfer Shawn Phillips (a rim protector who was a part-time starter last year) and Oklahoma transfer Luke Northweather (another big who can slide out and make a 3). Outside shooting could be a concern with the graduation of Grill and Tamar Bates, but Mitchell-Mack-Robinson could end up being one of the better trios in the SEC.

25. Ohio State

Projected starters: Bruce Thornton, John Mobley, Devin Royal, Brandon Noel (transfer), Christoph Tilly (transfer)
Notable returners: None
Other newcomers: Joshua Ojianwuna (transfer), Gabe Cupps (transfer), A’mare Bynum, Dorian Jones

This is the only team on this list that didn’t make the 2025 NCAA Tournament, but there’s a lot to like. Ohio State returns three of its top four scorers from a group that showed flashes a year ago, beating Kentucky by 20 at the CBS Sports Classic and winning at Purdue. What the Buckeyes were missing was consistency from the frontcourt, and coach Jake Diebler tried to address that with the additions of Christoph Tilly and Brandon Noel.

Tilly was a second-team All-WCC performer at Santa Clara and one of my favorite bigs in the portal. He’s an efficient scorer who can get buckets both inside and out. Noel averaged 19 points at Wright State and is a career 37.5 percent 3-point shooter. Diebler also got a solid backup center in former Baylor big Joshua Ojianwuna. This feels like the right mix of roster continuity and inbound veteran productivity.

Others under consideration: Tennessee, Iowa, Indiana, NC State, Texas, Ole Miss, Oregon, Wisconsin, Oklahoma.

(Top illustration photos: Elsa, Alex Slitz / Getty Images)

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

NIL

NCAA Tournament expansion is ‘right direction to at least explore,’ SEC commissioner Greg Sankey says

Imagn Images SEC commissioner Greg Sankey reiterated his interest in expansion of the NCAA basketball tournaments expansion Monday, saying “we think there are enough quality teams to make this growth appropriate.” “Nothing in college basketball is static,” Sankey said from the 2025 SEC Kickoff event in Atlanta. “So tournament expansion is certainly worth exploring.” The […]

Published

on


NCAA Football: SEC Media Day
Imagn Images

SEC commissioner Greg Sankey reiterated his interest in expansion of the NCAA basketball tournaments expansion Monday, saying “we think there are enough quality teams to make this growth appropriate.”

“Nothing in college basketball is static,” Sankey said from the 2025 SEC Kickoff event in Atlanta. “So tournament expansion is certainly worth exploring.”

The NCAA Division I men’s and women’s basketball committees debated expansion at their respective meetings last week but made no recommendation on whether to expand or remain at 68 for 2026 and beyond.

NCAA tables tournament expansion, delaying March Madness decision with 72, 76-team options still possible

Bryan DeArdo

NCAA tables tournament expansion, delaying March Madness decision with 72, 76-team options still possible

Though not a part of either committee, Sankey is arguably the most influential figure in college sports, and he made it clear that — over the long-haul — he favors growth from the current 68-team bracket configuration to one including 72 or 76 teams.

“To be clear, we support expansion,” Sankey said. “But you just don’t jump into it. So, if there are reasons from a broadcast point, a financial point, logistics point or competitive realities that don’t support expansion, again, we’re going to be fine. But in general, think this is the right direction to at least explore.”

Sankey’s bullishness on expansion suggests the matter won’t be receding from view anytime soon, and it’s still possible that expansion could be approved for as early as the 2025-26 season. 

However, Sankey noted that the SEC “is going to be fine whether the bracket expands or not.” The SEC placed a record 14 teams in the 2025 men’s NCAA Tournament and landed 10 teams in the women’s tournament. 

Amid the dawn of revenue-sharing in college athletics, leaders are looking for new opportunities to drive revenue. BUT NCAA leaders have yet to clearly articulate if or how expanding the men’s and women’s basketball tournaments would increase payout to NCAA schools.





Link

Continue Reading

NIL

Ruling on NIL collectives may reshape college sports scene

Valid businesses would only be allowed to make payments to student athletes Boise State fullback Tyler Crowe (33) celebrates his touchdown against Penn State during the first half of the Fiesta Bowl NCAA college football CFP quarterfinal game, Dec. 31 in Glendale, Arizona. (Ross D. Franklin/The Associated Press) ALBUQUERQUE – A new enforcement agency in […]

Published

on


Valid businesses would only be allowed to make payments to student athletes

Boise State fullback Tyler Crowe (33) celebrates his touchdown against Penn State during the first half of the Fiesta Bowl NCAA college football CFP quarterfinal game, Dec. 31 in Glendale, Arizona. (Ross D. Franklin/The Associated Press)

ALBUQUERQUE – A new enforcement agency in college sports has drawn a firm line regarding the regulation of name, image, and likeness (NIL) payments to athletes – a move that could dismantle how many school-affiliated collectives currently operate.

Last week, the College Sports Commission issued new guidance that significantly narrows what qualifies as a “valid business purpose” for NIL deals. The announcement came just days after the $2.8 billion House v. NCAA settlement took effect on July 1, establishing a clearinghouse called NIL Go to review third-party deals exceeding $600.

The goal is to prevent schools from circumventing the new $20.5 million revenue-sharing cap by routing funds through booster-backed collectives.

According to the CSC, any entity whose primary function is paying athletes – rather than offering legitimate goods or services to the public – fails to meet NIL Go’s standards. This includes collectives that host events or sell merchandise primarily to fund player payments. Even if these events are open to the public or involve promotional efforts, the CSC says they still don’t qualify.

The ruling has sent shock waves through the NIL ecosystem. In the four years since NIL deals became legal, school-affiliated collectives have funneled hundreds of millions of dollars into athlete compensation – often functioning as unofficial arms of athletic departments. These groups have paid athletes for appearances, endorsements, and social media promotions. But with the CSC now rejecting most of these deals, that model appears to be collapsing.

A memo sent to Division I athletic directors clarified the new standard: agreements with collectives primarily created to pay athletes or benefit specific schools will no longer be approved. While external NIL deals are still allowed, they must be with companies offering real products or services to the general public and must reflect fair market value.

The backlash was immediate. The Collective Association, which represents NIL collectives nationwide, called the CSC’s interpretation “misguided,” arguing it ignores both legal precedent and the economic realities of college athletics. The group claimed collectives are essential to athlete support and are being unfairly targeted.

Adding to the frustration, collective leaders like Dalton K. Forsythe of Utah State’s Blue A Collective reported widespread rejections of submitted NIL deals. “Nearly 100% of collective-backed NIL deals are being denied,” Forsythe posted on X, citing inconsistent standards and poor communication from NIL Go.

Mountain West Conference emblem is attached to a field marker along with the emblem of Colorado State during an NCAA college football game between Colorado and Colorado State, Saturday, Sept. 14, 2024, in Fort Collins, Colorado (AP Photo/David Zalubowski, File)

Despite the chaos, NIL Go has approved over 1,500 deals since launching in June, ranging in value from hundreds to millions of dollars. More than 12,000 athletes and 1,100 institutions are already registered. However, most approved transactions have involved athletes and legitimate businesses – not donor collectives.

Ultimately, the CSC has made clear that the future of NIL lies in traditional sponsorships and commercial endorsements, not donor-funded payouts. Whether courts will uphold these rules – or whether athletes will challenge them on antitrust grounds – remains to be seen. For now, though, the days of collectives writing large checks behind the scenes may be coming to an end.

The College Sports Commission’s new enforcement guidance is expected to significantly impact the Mountain West Conference (MWC), where many schools have relied on donor-driven collectives to remain competitive in a rapidly evolving landscape.

Potential Fallout for Mountain West Schools

This shift could hit programs like Boise State, Fresno State, San Diego State, and Utah State particularly hard. These schools have developed strong football reputations but lack the deep financial backing of Big Ten or SEC institutions.

Boise State running back Ashton Jeanty celebrates after winning the offensive player of the game for the Mountain West Championship NCAA college football game against UNLV, Friday, Dec. 6, 2024, in Boise, Idaho. (AP Photo/Steve Conner)

Boise State has relied on a passionate fan base and collective support to maintain its status as a Group of Five powerhouse. Without that funding source, Boise could fall behind in the NIL arms race.

Utah State’s Blue A Collective is already feeling the pressure. Director Dalton Forsythe reports that nearly all of their NIL submissions are being rejected under the new rules, calling the standards “unclear and unrealistic.”

Fresno State and San Diego State have used competitive NIL offers to retain local talent, but that ability may diminish without collective-based funding, making it harder to keep players from transferring out.

As the NIL landscape undergoes its most dramatic shift yet, the Mountain West Conference finds itself at a crossroads.

The new rules may level the playing field in theory, but in practice, they risk sidelining programs that have used creativity and community support to stay relevant.

With traditional collectives on the chopping block and commercial partnerships harder to come by in smaller markets, MWC schools must now adapt quickly – or risk falling further behind in a system increasingly tilted toward the power conferences.

The next chapter in college athletics will be defined not just by talent on the field, but by who can navigate the off-field rules best.

Roger Holien is a contributor for SB Nation.com and Mountain West Connection





Link

Continue Reading

NIL

Players Era 2025: Schedule announced for NIL-driven Players Era Men’s Championship

Las Vegas will once again be the place to be during Feast Week this college basketball season. Coined “November Mania,” the Players Era Men’s Championship announced its schedule for the newly expanded 18-team men’s basketball NIL multi-team event in November in Las Vegas on July 14, and to no surprise, it’s quite loaded. Advertisement Then […]

Published

on


Las Vegas will once again be the place to be during Feast Week this college basketball season.

Coined “November Mania,” the Players Era Men’s Championship announced its schedule for the newly expanded 18-team men’s basketball NIL multi-team event in November in Las Vegas on July 14, and to no surprise, it’s quite loaded.

Advertisement

Then called the Players Era Festival, the NIL-driven event by storm last season and has quickly become a must-play event with NCAA Tournament caliber teams, so much so that teams paid their way out of already scheduled multi-team events to participate in it last season.

Headlining the first two days of competition in Las Vegas is Gonzaga vs. Alabama on Wednesday, Nov. 25. Preceding the Bulldogs and Crimson Tide on Nov. 25 is St. John’s vs. Iowa State, two teams that are notoriously known for their defense under Rick Pitino and T.J. Otzelberger.

REQURIED READING: College basketball too-early Top 25 rankings after transfer portal, NBA draft

Advertisement

Day 2 of the 2025 Players Era Men’s Championship field is headlined by an Elite Eight rematch of Houston vs. Tennessee and then Iowa State vs. Creighton, two teams that were already scheduled to meet in October for an exhibition.

The 2025 Players Era Men’s Championship field includes 14 teams that made the NCAA Tournament last season, and nine teams — Auburn, Houston, St. John’s, Alabama, Iowa State, Maryland, Oregon and Michigan — that were seeded at least a five seed or higher in the field of 68. Eleven teams that appear in the USA TODAY Sports too-early top 25 poll will also compete in Las Vegas.

The four-day multi-team event will take place in Las Vegas at MGM Grand Garden Arena and Michelob Ultra Arena from Monday, Nov. 24 through Thursday, Nov. 27 with the championship game taking place on Wednesday, Nov. 26.

There will also be a four-team Players Era Women’s Championship featuring South Carolina, UCLA, Texas and Duke that will take place Wednesday, Nov. 26 and Thursday, Nov. 27 in Las Vegas.

Advertisement

Here’s what to know from the July 14 announcement of the 2025 Players Era Men’s Championship:

Players Era Championship bracket 2025

The returning teams to the Players Era Festival include Alabama, Houston, Rutgers, Notre Dame, Oregon, San Diego State and Creighton. The only team that isn’t returning to the Players Era Championship from last year’s field, which Oregon won, is Texas A&M. The Aggies were replaced in the field by Maryland, which hired away Buzz Williams from Texas A&M this offseason.

Here’s a full breakdown of who is competing in the 2025 Players Era Men’s Championship:

Players Era Festival 2025 schedule

Here’s a look at schedule for the 2025 Players Era Men’s Championship, which will take place MGM Grand Garden Arena and Michelob Ultra Arena in Las Vegas:

Advertisement

Monday, Nov. 24

  • Rutgers vs. Tennessee | 1 p.m. ET

  • Creighton vs. Baylor | 2 p.m. ET

  • Kansas vs. Notre Dame | 3:30 p.m. ET

  • St. John’s vs. Iowa State | 4:30 p.m. ET

  • Houston vs. Syracuse | 6 p.m. ET

  • Auburn vs. Oregon | 8 p.m. ET

  • Gonzaga vs. Alabama | 9:30 p.m. ET

  • Michigan vs. San Diego State | 10:30 p.m. ET

  • UNLV vs. Maryland | Midnight ET

Tuesday, Nov. 25

  • Rutgers vs. Notre Dame | 1 p.m. ET

  • Iowa State vs. Creighton | 2 p.m. ET

  • Kansas vs. Syracuse | 3:30 p.m. ET

  • St. John’s vs. Baylor | 4:30 p.m. ET

  • Houston vs. Tennessee | 6 p.m. ET

  • Michigan vs. Auburn | 8:30 p.m. ET

  • Gonzaga vs. Maryland | 9:30 p.m. ET

  • Oregon vs. San Diego State | 11 p.m. ET

  • UNLV vs. Alabama | Midnight ET

Wednesday, Nov. 26

  • Third Place Game: 7 p.m. ET

  • Championship Game: 9:30 p.m. ET

Note: For those that didn’t make the championship or third place game on Wednesday, November 26, they will play in consolation games across Wednesday, November 26 and Thursday, November 27 in Las Vegas

What is the Players Era Championshop?

The Players Era Championship is a one-of-a-kind multi-team event that takes place during “Feast Week” of the college basketball season in November, during Thanksgiving week. Debuted during the 2024-25 season with an eight-team field, The Players Era Championship is a NIL-driven multi-team event with some of the best college basketball teams in the country.

Advertisement

Each team will receive $1 million for participating in the event, while players and teams will have the opportunity to earn more NIL while in Las Vegas. The champion of the Players Era Championship will win an additional $1 million in NIL earnings as well. Noted by CBS Sports’ Matt Norlander, the total pot for the 2025 Players Era Championship will be north of $20 million in NIL-related earnings — quite the expensive multi-team event and regular season showcase event.

This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Players Era Men’s Championship full field, schedule announced



Link

Continue Reading

NIL

Tip times, matchups for NIL-driven college basketball tournament revealed

The Players Era Festival, an NIL-driven college basketball multi-team event set to feature Gonzaga and 17 other programs in its field this fall, has released the 20-game schedule for the 2025 edition from Las Vegas. The Players Era debuted this past November with eight teams competing in the Thanksgiving week tournament: Houston, Alabama, Rutgers, Notre […]

Published

on


The Players Era Festival, an NIL-driven college basketball multi-team event set to feature Gonzaga and 17 other programs in its field this fall, has released the 20-game schedule for the 2025 edition from Las Vegas.

The Players Era debuted this past November with eight teams competing in the Thanksgiving week tournament: Houston, Alabama, Rutgers, Notre Dame, Creighton, Oregon, Texas A&M and San Diego State (Oregon beat Alabama in the championship round). In addition to those eight, the following 10 teams join the 2025 field: Auburn, Baylor, Gonzaga, Iowa State, Kansas, Michigan, St. John’s, Syracuse, Tennessee and UNLV.

The Bulldogs drew Alabama for their first-round matchup, which has been set for Nov. 24 at 6:30 p.m. PST on TNT. The Zags will take on Maryland the next day at the same time, while being broadcast on TruTV. CBS Sports’ Matt Norlander first reported the matchups earlier this month.

Though the exact locations weren’t disclosed, each contest has been confirmed for either Michelob Ultra Arena or MGM Grand Garden Arena. If the Zags win both matchups out of the gate, they’ll advance to the championship round set for Nov. 26 at 6:30 p.m. In the likely event that more than two teams go 2-0 to start, point differential, total points scored and points allowed will serve as tiebreakers. The third-place game is the same day at 4 p.m. PST.

Every participating team is assured $1 million, with an additional $1 million awarded to the winner of Players Era. The pay structure is expected to work in a similar manner this year, with each school directly receiving compensation from event organizers, though how the teams divvy up the money to their players will be case-by-case.

With the House v. NCAA settlement reaching final approval, schools will be allowed to share up to $20.5 million per year in revenue with their student-athletes. Many schools won’t be able to reach that number, and some are planning to put portions of Players Era money into their overall rev-share cap, per Norlander.

According to The Field of 68, the team that finishes in second place will receive $500,000; third place will earn $300,000 and fourth will net $200,000.

Gonzaga’s nonconference schedule includes seven opponents that qualified for the 2025 NCAA Tournament: Oklahoma (Nov. 8 at Spokane Arena), Creighton (Nov. 11 at the Kennel), Kentucky (Dec. 5 in Nashville, Tennessee), UCLA (Dec. 13 in Seattle), Baylor (TBD), Alabama (Nov. 24) and Maryland (Nov. 25). Additionally, those seven teams makeJon Rothstein’s top 45 rankings of the offseason.

All times PST

Monday, Nov. 24
Tennessee vs. Rutgers, 10 a.m.
Baylor vs. Creighton, 11 a.m. 
Kansas vs. Notre Dame, 12:30 p.m. 
St. John’s vs. Iowa State, 1:30 p.m. 
Houston vs. Syracuse, 3 p.m. 
Oregon vs. Auburn, 5 p.m. 
Alabama vs. Gonzaga, 6:30 p.m. 
Michigan vs. San Diego State, 7:30 p.m. 
Maryland vs. UNLV, 9 p.m.

Tuesday, Nov. 25
Rutgers vs. Notre Dame, 10 a.m.
Iowa State vs. Creighton, 11:30 a.m. 
Kansas vs. Syracuse, 12:30 p.m 
St. John’s vs. Baylor, 2 p.m. 
Houston vs. Tennessee, 3 p.m. 
Michigan vs. Auburn, 5:30 p.m. 
Gonzaga vs. Maryland, 6:30 p.m. 
Oregon vs. San Diego State, 8 p.m. 
Alabama vs. UNLV, 9 p.m. 

Wednesday, Nov. 26
Third-place game, 4 p.m. PST
Championship game, 6:30 p.m. PST

MORE GONZAGA NEWS & ANALYSIS





Link

Continue Reading

NIL

Transfer Portal Softball Tracker – Cu Independent

Every year after the softball season ends, lots of players decide to leave their current teams and look for new ones. Maybe your team’s best pitcher will join a rival. Or maybe the hitter who gave you trouble last season might become your new teammate. Thanks to big NIL (Name, Image, and Likeness) deals and […]

Published

on


Every year after the softball season ends, lots of players decide to leave their current teams and look for new ones.

Maybe your team’s best pitcher will join a rival. Or maybe the hitter who gave you trouble last season might become your new teammate.

Thanks to big NIL (Name, Image, and Likeness) deals and players moving closer to home, the transfer portal has turned softball into a busy, year-round event.

Here, we will share the biggest player moves, top names still available, and how this new system is changing the way college softball operates.

What is the Transfer Portal?

The NCAA Transfer Portal, launched in October 2018, has revolutionized the process by which student-athletes transfer to a new school.

For softball players, it serves as a centralized database where athletes can enter their information and make themselves available to other programs.

The process works in several key steps:

  • A player notifies their school’s compliance office of their intention to transfer.
  • The school enters the player’s information into the portal within two business days.
  • Once in the portal, coaches from other schools can contact the player.
  • The player can then evaluate opportunities and commit to a new program.

As of April 2024, significant rule changes have made transferring more accessible than ever.

The NCAA has eliminated restrictions on the number of transfers academically eligible athletes can make during their college careers, removing the requirement to sit out a year for multiple transfers.

For softball specifically, the transfer windows for the 2025-2026 season will open after the regular season and last 30 days. Graduate transfers can enter the portal at any time.

Latest Transfer Portal Listings

Here are some of the most notable players currently in the 2025 softball transfer portal:

Player Name Position School Notable Achievements
Maya Johnson Pitcher Belmont 2024 All-American, looking for a Power Five opportunity
Desirae Spearman Pitcher New Mexico State Conference USA Player of the Year, in high demand
Arianna Rodi Infielder UMass Power hitter with two years of eligibility left
Ruby Meylan Pitcher Washington Former Pac-12 Freshman of the Year
NiJaree Canady Pitcher Stanford National Player of the Year finalist

Recent Transfer Portal Commitments

Several major commitments have already shaped the 2025 softball landscape:

  • CeCe Cellura to LSU: The former San Diego State pitcher committed to the Tigers on May 26, 2025, bringing elite talent to an SEC powerhouse.
  • Ella Harrison to Auburn: Another pitcher on the move, Harrison leaves Rutgers to join the competitive SEC at Auburn, also committing on May 26, 2025.
  • New Mexico State’s Portal Success: The Aggies have been particularly active, securing nine incoming transfers to bolster their roster after a 30-win 2024 campaign.

These moves highlight how programs are increasingly relying on transfers to fill immediate needs rather than waiting for freshman development.

The immediacy of impact has made transfer recruiting a top priority for coaching staffs across the nation.

Rising Programs to Watch Out!

Rising Programs to Watch Out!
Rising Programs to Watch Out!

Several college softball programs have made strategic moves in the transfer portal, utilizing it to increase their competitiveness and improve their performance.

  • Texas Tech made a significant splash by landing Ni’Jaree Canady, considered one of the nation’s top pitchers, with a stellar 0.73 ERA and 337 strikeouts last season, which immediately positions the Red Raiders as a serious contender.
  • Nebraska, although not historically a softball powerhouse, has proven its ability to attract top talent through the transfer portal, helping to improve the program’s status.
  • Oklahoma State, with a series of key power-conference transfers, including Ruby Meylan, is setting itself up as a new standard in the Big 12, showcasing the potential of the transfer portal to take a team from good to great.

These programs highlight how strategic portal use can accelerate rebuilding and increase a team’s performance.

Resources for Tracking Transfer Portal Activity

If you want to stay up-to-date, here are some of the best places for real-time transfer news:

For more details, click here.

Frequently Asked Questions

Are There Deadlines for Entering the Softball Transfer Portal?

Yes. There are sport-specific windows when athletes can enter the portal. Graduate transfers have more flexibility and can join at any time, but undergraduates must follow the designated transfer window for their sport.

Do Transfer Rules Differ Between NCAA Divisions?

Yes, while the general process is similar, some details, such as academic standards and scholarship rules, can vary between Division I, II, and III.



Link

Continue Reading

NIL

Johnny Manziel thinks he would have stayed in college over the NFL ‘no matter what’ with NIL

Johnny Manziel truly believes he would’ve stayed in college football at Texas A&M in the NIL era, rather than go to the NFL as early as he did. Following two years as a starter, Manziel declared for the NFL Draft and was a first round pick by the Cleveland Browns in 2014. However, his NFL […]

Published

on


Johnny Manziel truly believes he would’ve stayed in college football at Texas A&M in the NIL era, rather than go to the NFL as early as he did. Following two years as a starter, Manziel declared for the NFL Draft and was a first round pick by the Cleveland Browns in 2014.

However, his NFL career quickly flamed out and he had stints in the CFL a few years later, as well as Fan Controlled Football, an arena league. But, the former Heisman Trophy winner has been open and honest about his post-collegiate struggles on and off the field but has his moments where it’s fun to play the hypothetical game.

Just imagine Manziel, at the peak of his collegiate powers, rolling in the NIL dollars. And then coming back to Texas A&M on top of it? Oh man.

“I mean, I think no matter what, being in the NIL era, if that would have, you know, been the equivalent of 2013, I would have stayed no matter what,” Manziel said on Always College Football. “Just because, you know, a couple million bucks in College Station goes a really, really long way. And, you go to the NFL, or a first round pick, you know, you sign for $10 million or whatever it is, you know, that’s the two years that I had remaining at Texas A&M, to be able to make (that) through NIL. So I think, for me, when I think back about it now, I definitely, if there would have been any real money involved, I definitely would have stayed no matter what.”

This isn’t the first time Manziel alluded to more time in College Station. He spoke to fellow Heisman winner Matt Leinart about the topic back in December with NIL being such commonplace across college athletics.

“Yeah, I think so, just because, I mean, you know, you get into your rookie contract if you’re not taken  high enough, I mean, you know, I could have stayed two more years in college and probably made what I made throughout the four years of your NFL deal for the most part,” Manziel said. “So I think it would have given me the opportunity to still be at a place today and then like that, be able to make money and be able to, you know, still continue to go play the college football life. It’s tough for me looking back, having left two years of eligibility on a table.”

Manziel burst onto the college football scene in 2012 when he became the first freshman to ever win the Heisman Trophy. That year, he threw for 3,706 yards and 26 touchdowns to help the Aggies to an 11-2 record. 

Along the way, he set multiple records, including one against Arkansas when he had 557 yards of total offense. That broke Archie Manning’s record, and Manziel broke his own mark just two games later with 576 yards of offense in a single game. As a redshirt sophomore in 2013, Manziel threw for 4,114 yards and 37 touchdowns as he finished fifth in the Heisman voting.



Link

Continue Reading

Most Viewed Posts

Trending