Connect with us
https://yoursportsnation.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/call-to-1.png

NIL

Men's college basketball Top 25 reset

Published

on

Men's college basketball Top 25 reset

Now that the NBA Draft withdrawal deadline for college players has passed and only one unsigned player remains in our top 100 transfers list, most rosters are set for the 2025-26 men’s college basketball season.

That means it’s time to hit refresh on my top 25. It’s no longer a dart-throwing exercise. Except for perhaps a few late international signings, this ranking may be nearly identical to the one I submit right before the season.

Advertisement

In an effort to avoid groupthink, I did not look at any other human rankings, but once I had a top 25 set, I did browse Bart Torvik’s list, which is the one computerized data set that has already published rankings for next season. Out of my top 25 teams, 22 appear in Torvik’s top 25. That made me feel pretty good about this list.

So if you vehemently disagree with me, be prepared to also yell at the computers.

1. Purdue

Projected starters: Braden Smith, Omer Mayer (freshman), Fletcher Loyer, Trey Kaufman-Renn, Oscar Cluff (transfer)
Notable returners: C.J. Cox, Daniel Jacobsen, Gicarri Harris, Raleigh Burgess
Other newcomers: Liam Murphy (transfer), Antione West

One coach told me Omer Mayer was the steal of the international signings, and his performance at the Nike Hoops Summit backed that up. Mayer could start at point guard right now for any team in America. He just happens to be going to the one team that returns the best point guard in college basketball, but I’m convinced he and Braden Smith can coexist. Mayer will allow Smith to get some rest; Purdue’s best team of Smith’s first three years running point had Lance Jones as a secondary handler.

Oscar Cluff and Daniel Jacobsen should help address Purdue’s ’24-25 shortcomings: two-point defense and rebounding. The offense was already championship-level good; if the defense can be top-20ish, the Boilermakers will back up this preseason expectation.

2. Houston

Projected starters: Milos Uzan, Emanuel Sharp, Isiah Harwell (freshman), Chris Cenac Jr. (freshman), Joseph Tugler
Other returners: Mercy Miller, Ramon Walker, Cedric Lath
Other newcomers: Kingston Flemings, Bryce Jackson, Kalifa Sakho (transfer)

Kelvin Sampson has had a freshman in his regular starting lineup in only three of his 11 seasons as Houston’s head coach. He’s never had two. But this is arguably the best freshman class Sampson has ever landed: No. 2 in the country, per 247Sports, behind only Duke. It’s tough to bet against the Coogs because of the three veterans in the starting lineup. Joseph Tugler is a defensive player of the year frontrunner; Emanuel Sharp is one of the nation’s best shooters; Milos Uzan was one of the best point guards in the country down the stretch this spring.

Advertisement

The Coogs will miss LJ Cryer’s shotmaking, but we say that every year about a departing Houston guard, and someone inevitably fills that void. Uzan’s decision to withdraw from the draft was a stabilizer. If Houston had to rely on a freshman at point guard or try to play Pop Isaacs (now at Texas A&M) away from his natural position, its outlook would be a lot less certain. If the freshmen can adjust quickly, the defensive possibilities for this group are pretty scary.

3. UConn

Projected starters: Silas Demary Jr. (transfer), Solo Ball, Jaylin Stewart, Alex Karaban, Tarris Reed
Notable returners: Jayden Ross
Other newcomers: Malachi Smith (transfer), Braylon Mullins, Darius Adams, Eric Reibe, Jacob Furphy (international), Jacob Ross

In 2022 the Huskies returned two starters and three of the top seven scorers from a team that won 23 games and lost in the first round of the NCAA Tournament, then landed a 6-foot-5 point guard out of the transfer portal and won a title. The 2025-26 Huskies return two starters and four of the top seven scorers from a team that won 24 games and made the second round of the NCAA Tournament. They landed a 6-foot-5 point guard out of the transfer portal. Will the end result be the same?

It’s not hard to see who slots into each role on the ’22-23 champs. Solo Ball could be the Jordan Hawkins, a gifted shooter ready to become one of the nation’s best shooting guards. Tarris Reed is capable of carrying the offense like Adama Sanogo could. This year’s UConn has a gifted freshman backup center in Eric Reibe; the original model was Donovan Clingan. The ’22-23 champs had Alex Karaban; this team has (an older) Alex Karaban. And then Georgia transfer Silas Demary Jr. seems like the ideal fit to play the Tristen Newton role. I’m not sure Jaylin Stewart can match Andre Jackson, and Reibe might be further along offensively but won’t have Clingan’s defensive impact, but you could argue the rest of the cast of characters are equals. Last year was a rebuilding season, but I’m betting this group is ready to win now that the core has had time to marinate.

4. Michigan

Projected starters: Elliot Cadeau (transfer), Nimari Burnett, Yaxel Lendeborg (transfer), Morez Johnson (transfer), Aday Mara (transfer)
Notable returners: LJ Cason, Roddy Gayle, Will Tschetter
Other newcomers: Trey McKenney, Winters Grady, Patrick Liburd

Advertisement

Michigan was really good defensively last year and has a chance to be elite after the work Dusty May did in the portal. Per CBB Analytics, the former teams of the three bigs Michigan added were all significantly better with them on the floor last season: Aday Mara (UCLA was 7.6 points per 100 possessions better), Morez Johnson (Illinois, 11 points per 100 possessions better) and Yaxel Lendeborg (UAB, 6.2 points per 100 possessions better). Mara would have had the highest block percentage in the country had he played enough to qualify for the KenPom.com leaderboard. It’s going to be difficult to score in the paint with so much positional size and Mara protecting the basket.

The stat sheet-stuffing Lendeborg is versatile enough for Michigan to play the three bigs together. Shooting will be the biggest concern. The Wolverines shot just 33.2 percent from deep last season and replaced one of their best shooters (Tre Donaldson) with a point guard (Elliot Cadeau) whom opposing defenses mostly ignore beyond the arc, but freshman Trey McKenney should help. He’s one of the most game-ready freshman guards in the country. Cadeau’s passing should also help an offense that struggled with turnovers. May has depth at every spot, experience and lineup versatility that should allow the Wolverines to match up with anybody.

5. Florida

Projected starters: Boogie Fland (transfer), Xaivian Lee (transfer), Thomas Haugh, Alex Condon, Rueben Chinyelu
Notable returners: Micah Handlogten, Urban Klavzar
Other newcomers: Alex Lloyd, CJ Ingram, AJ Brown (transfer)

Big is back: Last season’s best teams had positional size and elite paint protection. Florida could play a giant lineup that features Thomas Haugh (6-9), Alex Condon (6-11) and Rueben Chinyelu (6-10) up front. Those three played together only three possessions last season, per CBB Analytics, but it’ll be hard to justify bringing one of them off the bench, considering Haugh’s performance in the NCAA Tournament and the inexperience of the other wing options. That big lineup could also help mask some defensive limitations of Boogie Fland and Xaivian Lee.

Florida’s up-tempo style should help Fland prove he can be a more efficient player than he was under John Calipari. The Gators will contend for another title if Fland and Lee are productive and if Haugh and Condon continue to gain confidence in their playmaking and scoring abilities. They’ll be expected to perform more like stars and take some of the heat off perimeter guys who cannot be expected to replicate the production of Walter Clayton.

6. Louisville

Projected starters: Mikel Brown Jr. (freshman), Ryan Conwell (transfer), Isaac McKneely (transfer), Sananda Fru (international), Kasean Pryor
Notable returners: J’Vonne Hadley, Khani Rooths
Other newcomers: Adrian Wooley (transfer), Mouhamed Camara (international), Vangelis Zougris (international)

Current projections have Aly Khalifa off the roster because the NCAA has ruled he’s run out his five-year eligibility clock, but I’m betting Khalifa is eventually allowed to play, whether it’s through appeal or a future lawsuit. He’s one of the best passing bigs in the country and would be the perfect hub in Pat Kelsey’s offense. Without him, Louisville still has some fun options up front with Kasean Pryor, who was looking like one of Louisville’s best players before his injury last year, and 21-year-old German big Sananda Fru, who should be ready to contribute right away.

Advertisement

Ryan Conwell was one of the best guards in the Big East last season, Isaac McKneely is a knockdown shooter and capable of scoring some off the bounce, and Adrian Wooley is one of the highest-upside guards in the portal. The Cards also have a five-star point guard in Mikel Brown Jr. This is one of the most talented rosters on paper, and Kelsey proved last year that he can get a bunch of hired guns to blend quickly.

7. BYU

Projected starters: Rob Wright (transfer), Kennard Davis (transfer), Richie Saunders, AJ Dybantsa (freshman), Keba Keita
Notable returners: Dawson Baker, Mihailo Boskovic
Other newcomers: Dominique Diomande (transfer), Xavion Staton, Chamberlain Burgess, Tyler Mrus (transfer), Nate Pickens (transfer)

Not all top-five recruits are created equal. Some years it’s Kevin Durant and Greg Oden. Some years it’s Isaiah Collier and Justin Edwards. This 2025 class — headlined by Darryn Peterson, AJ Dybantsa and Cameron Boozer — is expected to be one of those special classes. BYU is betting big on Dybantsa and has an elite big three with Dybantsa, Rob Wright (one of the best freshman point guards last season at Baylor) and first-team All-Big 12 honoree Richie Saunders. Center Keba Keita gives Wright a good pick-and-roll partner and elevates the defense. Mihailo Boskovic flashed high upside in his first season in the program. Dawson Baker is a solid sixth man who is good enough to start if Southern Illinois transfer guard Kennard Davis struggles with the level change. Anything else BYU gets from newcomers will be gravy.

Kevin Young seemed to find his groove as a college head coach about halfway through his first season. You never know how NBA guys will do at this level, but no one since Fred Hoiberg has made the move this seamlessly.

8. Duke

Projected starters: Caleb Foster, Isaiah Evans, Dame Sarr (international), Cameron Boozer (freshman), Patrick Ngongba
Notable returners: Darren Harris, Maliq Brown
Other newcomers: Cayden Boozer, Nikolas Khamenia, Sebastian Wilkins, Ifeanyl Ufochukwu (transfer)

Cameron Boozer is probably the surest bet of any incoming freshman. My worry for the Blue Devils is at point guard and on the defensive end. Duke was 19.3 points per 100 possessions worse with Caleb Foster on the floor last season, per CBB Analytics. Last year, guards Kon Knueppel and Sion James were so physical they could switch onto anyone. That won’t be the case with Isaiah Evans or Dame Sarr, although Sarr has the length and instincts to be a high-level defender. Cooper Flagg and Khaman Maluach could clean up a lot of mistakes inside. Boozer should be a solid defender, but he’s nowhere close to those two as a rim protector, and neither are Maliq Brown or Patrick Ngongba.

Jon Scheyer should be able to figure out how to make the offense work around Boozer. Sarr has lottery-level upside. Foster and Evans are the players who probably control the team’s floor and ceiling. Foster flopped in his first chance to be the starting point guard, and Cayden Boozer would be the backup plan.

Advertisement

Evans had a de facto warmup season this past year, when anything he provided was gravy. Maybe he turns into a star. Maybe he’s just a streaky shooter and not much more. The inexperience across the board is worrisome, but Duke’s bet on talent usually works out.

9. Kentucky

Projected starters: Jaland Lowe (transfer) Denzel Aberdeen (transfer), Otega Oweh, Andrija Jelavic (international), Jayden Quaintance (transfer)
Notable returners: Brandon Garrison, Collin Chandler, Trent Noah
Other newcomers: Mouhamed Dioubate (transfer), Kam Williams (transfer), Jasper Johnson, Malachi Moreno, Reece Potter (transfer), Braydon Hawthorne

This roster does not have the shooting of Mark Pope’s first Kentucky team, but it should be better defensively and have more playmaking on the perimeter. Pope showed in Year 1 that he can microwave chemistry. He’s also giving himself a ton of lineup options. Not only will there be position battles for starting jobs, but also Kentucky will have some talented players who struggle to even make the rotation.

I’m most intrigued by the frontcourt. Pope likes his bigs to be the playmaking hubs of his offense, and Andrija Jelavic, Mouhamed Dioubate and Jayden Quaintance are all intriguing options, though I’m not sure any of them can fully replace Amari Williams. Jelavic was a double-digit scorer for his professional club overseas, and Quaintance is considered a lottery-level prospect. He’ll have to beat out Brandon Garrison after recovering from a torn ACL.

You know what you’re going to get out of Otega Oweh and Florida transfer Denzel Aberdeen, who would have been a starter on most SEC teams last year. Pitt transfer Jaland Lowe is more of a true point guard than Lamont Butler, but he goes through spurts of inefficiency. If Lowe can be an all-league-caliber guard and one or two of the bigs can produce consistently, this could be a title contender.

10. Auburn

Projected starters: Tahaad Pettiford, Elyjah Freeman (transfer), Keyshawn Hall (transfer), Filip Jovic (Auburn), KeShawn Murphy (transfer)
Other newcomers: Kevin Overton (transfer), Abdul Bashir (juco transfer), Emeka Opurum (juco transfer), Sebastian Williams-Adams, Kaden Magwood, Simon Walker

Pettiford performed so well at the NBA Draft combine that it’s a little surprising he’s returning to school. And I like what Bruce Pearl did in the portal. He got a proven scorer in Keyshawn Hall. He got the perfect energy/defensive big man in KeShawn Murphy, who has already shown he can be a winning player in the SEC. Serbian big man Filip Jovic comes from the same pro league that produced Tomislav Ivisic and put up better scoring numbers. Elyjah Freeman is a high upside swing who comes from Division II but was on the radar of NBA folks at Lincoln Memorial University. Texas Tech transfer Kevin Overton is also a starter-level player, and Abdul Bashir, one of the top juco recruits in the country, is another upside swing.

Advertisement

Pettiford could be in for a usage increase that makes him a National Player of the Year candidate, and I’d bet on at least two of the other additions being consistent scorers. Defense is the concern, but Murphy should help solidify that end, and three of Pearl’s last four teams finished in the top 10 of adjusted defensive efficiency.

11. Illinois

Projected starters: Mihailo Petrovic (international), Kylan Boswell, Andrej Stojakovic (transfer), David Mirkovic (international), Tomislav Ivisic
Notable returners: Ben Humrichous, Ty Rodgers, Jake Davis
Other newcomers: Zvonimir Ivisic (transfer), Brandon Lee, Keaton Wagler

I cannot wait to see how the Balkan Illini come together. Head coach Brad Underwood decided a year ago to put most of his money toward international recruiting instead of top-line high schoolers or transfers, which gave him a head start with some of the top European prospects coming over this year. The headliner is Mihailo Petrovic, a 22-year-old point guard who was an MVP candidate in the Adriatic League, averaging 14.2 points and 7.3 assists playing against professionals. It’s the same league where the Ivisic brothers played before coming to the U.S., and Underwood went there to get likely starting power forward David Mirkovic as well. Andrej Stojakovic never played in the Adriatic League, but his dad, Peja, is from Croatia. Andrej averaged 17.9 points for a bad Cal team, but he’s meant to be the second or third or fourth option for the Illini.

Defense is a question mark, but this team is going to run beautiful offense. Next order of business: Nike needs to make this orange tracksuit for Underwood, and he must coach in it.

12. St. John’s

Projected starters: Dylan Darling (transfer) Ian Jackson (transfer), Joson Sanon (transfer), Bryce Hopkins (transfer), Zuby Ejiofor
Notable returners: Ruben Prey, Lefteris Liotopoulos
Other newcomers: Dillon Mitchell (transfer), Oziyah Sellers (transfer), Handje Tamba (transfer), Kelvin Odih, Imran Suljanovic

I wrote this in the offseason’s first top 25: “If Rick Pitino lands a stud guard, I’ll probably be inclined to move St. John’s into the top 10 because it’s Pitino.” Since then he’s landed Ian Jackson (averaged 11.9 points as a freshman at North Carolina), Dylan Darling (the Big Sky MVP at Idaho State) and Oziyah Sellers (averaged 13.7 points on a middle-of-the-pack ACC team at Stanford). Arizona State transfer Joson Sanon, who was already committed at the time of April’s top 25, is also a nice upside addition from a crummy team. None of the three high-major guys have contributed much to winning outfits, and even Darling was on a fourth-place Big Sky team, so I’m hesitant to move the Johnnies all the way into the top 10.

It’s also hard to assume Bryce Hopkins is going to be the Bryce Hopkins of his sophomore season at Providence. Hopkins has played four games since the beginning of 2024. Pitino did get some insurance by landing former Texas/Cincinnati forward Dillon Mitchell, who I think is a great fit for his defense. If Hopkins is healthy, it’s a top-10 frontcourt. It’s possible I’m underestimating Pitino, but I think I’d take the 2024-25 roster over this one.

Advertisement

13. Texas Tech

Projected starters: Christian Anderson, LeJuan Watts (transfer), Tyeree Bryan (transfer), JT Toppin, Luke Bamgboye (transfer)
Other newcomers: Donovan Atwell (transfer), Josiah Moseley (transfer), Nolan Groves

Christian Anderson played with the presence of a veteran as a freshman. JT Toppin will be a preseason All-American. Head coach Grant McCasland once again prioritized shooting, landing three wings who shot 39-plus percent from 3 last season — Tyeree Bryan and Donovan Atwell are proven specialists, while LeJuan Watts is more of an all-around guard. Luke Bamgboye is an elite rim protector, ranking second nationally in block rate as a freshman at VCU.

For an offense that tries to capitalize on mismatches, it was a blow to lose Darrion Williams to NC State, but Anderson-Toppin should be one of the best point guard-big combos in the country, and the shooters should give them space to work.

14. Gonzaga

Projected starters: Braeden Smith,Tyon Grant-Foster, Adam Miller, Braden Huff, Graham Ike
Notable returners: Steele Venters, Emmanuel Innocenti, Ismaila Diagne
Other newcomers: Jalen Warley (transfer), Davis Fogle, Parker Jefferson

Apologies to Gonzaga, which I mistakenly omitted on my last rankings because I overlooked fifth-year senior Graham Ike’s ability to come back for a sixth year. Ike played two years at Wyoming, sat out 2022-23 with an injury, then played the last two years. So four in five and done, right? Nope. He’s one of those rare players with an extra season left because his freshman season was the 2020-21 COVID-19 waiver year.

This roster is old. Adam Miller, who will play a fifth season in six years, will be a floor spacer. The Zags hope to welcome back 24-year-old sharpshooter Steele Venters, the 2023 Big Sky MVP who has missed the last two seasons — first with a torn ACL, then an Achilles tendon tear. Gonzaga brought in well-traveled 25-year-old Tyon Grant-Foster (Indiana Hills Community College to Kansas to DePaul to Grand Canyon and now to Gonzaga), who fits neatly in the bucket-getting role Khalif Battle held last season. Replacing Ryan Nembhard at point guard is Braeden Smith, the 2024 Patriot League Player of the Year who was the rare transfer willing to actually sit out a year, learning the Gonzaga way as Nembhard’s understudy.

So the Zags have a table setter, an elite wing scorer, a couple of old knockdown shooters and two elite post-up guys in Ike and Braden Huff, who will inevitably end up an All-American by the time he’s finished in Spokane. It’s possible I haven’t overcorrected enough on my previous mistake.

Advertisement

15. Kansas

Projected starters: Darryn Peterson (freshman), Elmarko Jackson, Jayden Dawson (transfer), Tre White (transfer), Flory Bidunga
Notable returners: Bryson Tiller, Jamari McDowell
Other newcomers: Melvin Council (transfer), Samis Calderon

Bill Self told me recently that Kansas was one 14-15-point scorer away from having what he felt was a complete team. The Jayhawks missed on two targets for that spot in Darrion Williams (NC State) and Dame Sarr (Duke). There isn’t much left in the transfer portal, so Self could either go shopping overseas or just go with what he has and try to find at least one more big body for depth up front.

Self built this roster with “fit rather than talent” in mind, but he has a surefire pro in Darryn Peterson, who is expected to be one of the top picks in the 2026 draft. Self says Peterson is the “most prepared high school kid” he’s signed at Kansas — high praise considering Self has coached Andrew Wiggins, Joel Embiid and multiple other one-and-done lottery picks.

Self wisely signed transfers who can either stretch the floor (Jayden Dawson) or put pressure on the rim with their speed (Melvin Council). Freshman forward Bryson Tiller will need to be ready to play right away. But this team is built to be disruptive defensively, and if Peterson lives up to the hype and guys like Flory Bidunga and Elmarko Jackson develop, KU has enough talent to be a Big 12 contender again.

16. Iowa State

Projected starters: Tamin Lipsey, Dominick Nelson (transfer), Milan Momcilovic, Joshua Jefferson, Blake Buchanan (transfer)
Notable returners: Nate Heise
Other newcomers: Eric Mulder (transfer), Mason Williams (transfer), Jamarion Batemon, Killyan Toure, Xzavion Mitchell, Dominykas Pleta

The Clones struggled down the stretch when Keshon Gilbert was out, and Curtis Jones had to go nuclear for the offense to thrive. The good news is that T.J. Otzelberger has nailed the up-transfer market, and Utah Valley’s Dominick Nelson and Eastern Washington’s Mason Williams are the next guys who really need to hit. Even if they aren’t go-to scorers, the offense could be really good if Joshua Jefferson and Milan Momcilovic continue to improve.

The defense did slip slightly last year — from first to 13th in adjusted efficiency — and that’s in part because Iowa State wasn’t as physical and deep up front. But the Clones are never going to slip far with Tamin Lipsey at the head of the attack. Otzelberger has a formula that seems to keep working, and returning three starters from a NCAA Tournament team is a great foundation.

Advertisement

17. Arkansas

Projected starters: Darius Acuff Jr. (freshman), DJ Wagner, Karter Knox, Trevon Brazile, Malique Ewin (transfer)
Notable returners: Billy Richmond
Other newcomers: Karim Rtail (international), Nick Pringle (transfer), Meleek Thomas, Isaiah Sealy

This core should enter the season with some confidence after a surprise Sweet 16 run. John Calipari has a good mix of size, speed and guards who can get their own buckets. The concern is that this group leans into that last category too much and the offense looks disjointed, a common flaw of Calipari’s worst teams. Hope for a more cohesive approach comes with the addition of Malique Ewin, assuming the Florida State transfer gets used correctly. Ewin is a perfect fit for an SEC in which the best teams all have playmaking centers.

The defense could be elite with so much positional size. Arkansas played its best after Calipari made Trevon Brazile a starter late in the year, and pairing him with Ewin allows Arkansas to play five-out and take advantage of its team speed. It could be another up-and-down season, but as we saw this past year, once the talent figures out how to coexist, the ceiling is pretty high.

18. UCLA

Projected starters: Donovan Dent (transfer), Skyy Clark, Eric Dailey, Tyler Bilodeau, Xavier Booker (transfer)
Notable returners: Trent Perry
Other newcomers: Steven Jamerson (transfer), Jamar Brown (transfer)

The Bruins haven’t had a true point guard since Tyger Campbell. He was the last UCLA player to post an assist rate higher than 30 percent, in 2021; that’s also the last time UCLA made the Final Four. Top-shelf transfer Donovan Dent has had a plus-30 assist rate in each of his last two seasons at New Mexico.

Head coach Mick Cronin’s best teams usually play elite defense and execute his sets, and it feels like Dent should help in both areas. The Bruins welcome back three starters (Eric Dailey, Tyler Bilodeau and Skyy Clark) who transferred in a year ago and were efficient in Cronin’s system. The wild card is Michigan State transfer Xavier Booker, a former five-star recruit who never seemed to live up to the hype. He seems like an odd fit for Cronin, but maybe a change of scenery will unlock his potential.

19. Arizona

Projected starters: Jaden Bradley, Brayden Burries (freshman), Anthony Dell’Orso, Koa Peat (freshman), Motiejus Krivas
Other returners: Tobe Awaka
Other newcomers: Evan Nelson (transfer), Dwayne Aristode, Bryce James

Advertisement

Arizona brings in 247Sports’ No. 3 high school signing class and will likely throw its two five-stars (Brayden Burries and Koa Peat) into the starting lineup. Peat brings playmaking and athleticism to the frontcourt, and Burries’ ability to score is going to be critical with the graduation of Caleb Love. The Cats also need a breakout season from Motiejus Krivas, who played only eight games in 2024-25 because of a foot injury. The Wildcats lost Henri Veesaar to North Carolina after a breakout season, but when healthy, Krivas has always beaten Veesaar out. He and Tobe Awaka could make Arizona one of the best offensive rebounding teams in the country.

The Wildcats showed flashes of elite defense last year but never really leaned into that strength. For this team to hit its ceiling, defense will need to be a calling card, helping the offense get out in transition, where Jaden Bradley and Peat excel. Like Sampson at Houston, head coach Tommy Lloyd prioritized his high school class rather than loading up in the portal. With the COVID-19 waiver year mostly phased out of college basketball, it’ll be interesting to see whether more top-tier programs start to prioritize freshmen again. It worked out well for Duke this spring.

20. North Carolina

Projected starters: Kyan Evans (transfer), Seth Trimble, Luka Bogavac (international), Caleb Wilson (freshman), Henri Veesaar (transfer)
Other newcomers: Jarin Stevenson (transfer), Jonathan Powell (transfer), Jaydon Young (transfer), Derek Dixon, Isaiah Denis

Head coach Hubert Davis whiffed on his front line a year ago, and that’s where most of UNC’s offseason budget went. Caleb Wilson and Veesaar bring a little more scoring but a lot more defensive skill to the front line. Wilson is long, quick-twitch and switchable — not quite a young Anthony Davis, but in that mold. Veesaar is also an elite rim protector; Arizona’s defense was 10.5 points per 100 possessions better with him on the floor last season, per CBB Analytics. The Tar Heels have the positional size to start 6-foot-11 Jarin Stevenson at the three. Worst-case scenario, he’s a backup to Wilson as a stretch four; best case, he continues to emerge as an NBA prospect.

With RJ Davis graduating, UNC also addressed the need for shooting in the portal by adding Colorado State point guard Kyan Evans (44.6 percent from 3) and West Virginia guard Jonathan Powell (35.2 percent). Freshman guard Derek Dixon, a good shooter who always plays under control, was one of my favorite players on the EYBL circuit. The Tar Heels are missing a dynamic scorer on the perimeter and will need to score more through execution, but the pieces fit.

21. Michigan State

Projected starters: Jeremy Fears, Trey Fort (transfer), Coen Carr, Jaxon Kohler, Carson Cooper
Notable returners: Jesse McCulloch
Other newcomers: Cam Ward, Jordan Scott, Kaleb Glenn (transfer), Divine Ugochukwu (transfer)

Coen Carr as the starting small forward could cause some spacing issues and make a crummy 3-point shooting team even crummier, but head coach Tom Izzo does not give a damn about your analytics. The Spartans are going to guard and play fast, and we all need more chances to see Carr punishing rims.

Advertisement

But yeah … the shooting. It’s a worry. Izzo at least addressed it in the portal by grabbing Trey Fort (37.9 percent from 3 at Samford) and Kaleb Glenn (41 percent at Florida Atlantic). I’m not sure I buy Glenn as a 40 percent 3-point shooter, but he deserves credit for drastically improving in that area after going 1 of 9 from deep as a freshman at Louisville. Ideally, this team would have been a preseason top-10 outfit led by a sophomore Jase Richardson, but Richardson was too good too fast. Now the Spartans will need to win by guarding, running and playing through the bigs. Old-school Izzo.

22. Creighton

Projected starters: Nik Graves (transfer), Josh Dix (transfer), Blake Harper (transfer), Jackson McAndrew, Owen Freeman (transfer)
Notable returners: Jasen Green, Isaac Traudt
Other newcomers: Hudson Greer, Austin Swartz (transfer)

Josh Dix and Owen Freeman should be the best two players on this team, and it is worth pointing out both spent last year on an Iowa team that won only seven games in the Big Ten. (The Hawkeyes were 4-6 in conference play before Freeman was lost for the year. Not great, but not awful!) So why am I high on Creighton? One, I think Dix can be one of the best wings in the country. Two, in Gregg McDermott I trust.

McDermott landed another talented wing in Blake Harper, who averaged 19.5 points per game as a freshman at Howard. Jackson McAndrew made 69 3s as a freshman, and Nik Graves made 61 last season at Charlotte. Hudson Greer is one of the better shooting wings in the 2025 class. The “let it fly” Bluejays will be back, which should give Freeman, an elite back-to-the-basket scorer, plenty of room to operate. The Jays are going to really miss Ryan Kalkbrenner, especially on defense, but give McDermott this much offensive talent, and he’s going to figure it out.

23. Alabama

Projected starters: Labaron Philon, Aden Holloway, Latrell Wrightsell, Taylor Bol Bowen (transfer), Aiden Sherrell
Notable returners: Houston Mallette
Other newcomers: Jalil Bethea (transfer), London Jemison, Davion Hannah, Amari Allen, Noah Williamson (transfer), Keitenn Bristow (transfer)

I had Alabama out of the first version of these rankings, under the assumption Labaron Philon was going to stay in the NBA Draft — he’d previously said he was “all in.” I was underwhelmed by Alabama’s transfer haul, and Nate Oats lost a ton of production off last year’s roster, though he still had shooting. And I might have been onto something, considering Bart Torvik’s ratings have Bama at 38. But I love, love, love Philon, and his reentry into the lineup changes the equation.

Philon’s presence takes some pressure off Aden Holloway, and his ability to live in the paint should help set up the shooters. Aiden Sherrell needs to make a leap, but he could be dangerous if he makes enough shots to stretch defenses. The other option at the five is Patriot League Player of the Year Noah Williamson, but I think he’s going to have a tough time matching high-major speed and athleticism. Maybe one of Alabama’s freshmen is way better than expected, as Philon was a year ago. Oats probably deserves the benefit of the doubt, but this appears to be a drop-off in talent from his last two rosters.

Advertisement

24. Missouri

Projected starters: Anthony Robinson, Sebastian Mack (transfer), Trent Pierce, Mark Mitchell, Jevon Porter (transfer)
Notable returners: Jacob Crews, Trent Burns, TO Barrett, Annor Boateng
Other newcomers: Shawn Phillips (transfer), Jayden Stone (transfer), Luke Northweather (transfer), Aaron Rowe, Nicholas Randall

Missouri returns three starters from a Top 25 team. I was a big fan of Sebastian Mack a few years ago on the EYBL circuit, and while he was solid at UCLA, it feels like he has the potential to be more productive in a high-tempo system like Mizzou’s. He should fit nicely in the Tony Perkins role. Jacob Crews should elevate from the second shooter off the bench to take Caleb Grill’s sixth-man spot.

The Tigers’ ceiling could be determined by the productivity of Jevon Porter and Trent Burns at center. Porter, the little brother of former Tigers Michael and Jontay, averaged double figures for three seasons in the West Coast Conference. The 7-foot-5 Burns, who redshirted as a freshman, can step out and hit a 3. To borrow an old Fran Fraschilla line, he could be a year away from being a year away, but he’s a fascinating prospect.

Dennis Gates got frontcourt reinforcements from Arizona State transfer Shawn Phillips (a rim protector who was a part-time starter last year) and Oklahoma transfer Luke Northweather (another big who can slide out and make a 3). Outside shooting could be a concern with the graduation of Grill and Tamar Bates, but Mitchell-Mack-Robinson could end up being one of the better trios in the SEC.

25. Ohio State

Projected starters: Bruce Thornton, John Mobley, Devin Royal, Brandon Noel (transfer), Christoph Tilly (transfer)
Notable returners: None
Other newcomers: Joshua Ojianwuna (transfer), Gabe Cupps (transfer), A’mare Bynum, Dorian Jones

This is the only team on this list that didn’t make the 2025 NCAA Tournament, but there’s a lot to like. Ohio State returns three of its top four scorers from a group that showed flashes a year ago, beating Kentucky by 20 at the CBS Sports Classic and winning at Purdue. What the Buckeyes were missing was consistency from the frontcourt, and coach Jake Diebler tried to address that with the additions of Christoph Tilly and Brandon Noel.

Tilly was a second-team All-WCC performer at Santa Clara and one of my favorite bigs in the portal. He’s an efficient scorer who can get buckets both inside and out. Noel averaged 19 points at Wright State and is a career 37.5 percent 3-point shooter. Diebler also got a solid backup center in former Baylor big Joshua Ojianwuna. This feels like the right mix of roster continuity and inbound veteran productivity.

Others under consideration: Tennessee, Iowa, Indiana, NC State, Texas, Ole Miss, Oregon, Wisconsin, Oklahoma.

(Top illustration photos: Elsa, Alex Slitz / Getty Images)

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

NIL

Jordan Seaton enters transfer portal: Colorado OT can expect NIL bidding war

Published

on


seaton.png
Getty Images

Colorado offensive tackle Jordan Seaton is the college football transfer portal’s best-available prospect after announcing entry with a goodbye letter. The 6-foot-5, 330-pounder was a five-star signee for Deion Sanders and Colorado as the gem of its 2024 recruiting cycle. He projects as one of the 2027 NFL Draft’s top prospects.

Seaton, the No. 4 overall transfer per 247Sports and the top offensive tackle, can expect quite the bidding war with NIL money.

“(His) reported asking price is around $2.5M,” 247Sports’ college football and transfer portal analyst Cooper Petagna said. “I would expect him to receive north of $3 million considering the number of tackle needy contenders.”

During his high-school recruitment, Maryland was in the mix for Seaton, a former Washington (D.C.) St. John’s College High star, as coach Mike Locksley developed a relationship with the massive blocker. The third highest-rated recruit in Colorado history, Seaton started all 22 games during which he appeared with the Buffalos.

Seaton’s exit is Colorado’s biggest loss this offseason. Seaton played 1,421 offensive snaps over his two-year stint, grading out at 67.2 as a true freshman in 2024 and 65.8 as a sophomore this season, via Pro Football Focus.

The Buffaloes lost more than three dozen players to the portal since their season-ending loss at Utah to finish 3-9.

“The thing about these guys man, you’ve got to understand when a guy leaves a program that selected him or picked him out of the portal, he leaves for a multitude of reasons,” Sanders said about Colorado’s expected roster changes. “The No. 1 reason people leave is money. It’s not a disdain for staff or a disdain for player, it’s money. Let’s just be honest man and stop sugar-coating this foolishness. That’s why most people leave. 

“I admire the guys that want to go for another opportunity or bigger opportunity and play for a national championship … I applaud that, but that’s not the No. 1 reason people leave programs.”





Link

Continue Reading

NIL

Arizona State football ranks in middle of Big 12 in NIL dollars, agent says

Published

on


TEMPE, AZ (AZFamily) — Arizona State ranks somewhere in the middle of the Big 12 Conference for football name, image and likeness (NIL) spending, according to a Tempe-based agent.

Peter Boyle, founder and CEO of Activate Sports Management, said ASU has made significant progress since NIL rules were implemented in July 2021.

“If I were to guess based off what I see when you’re talking about football, which is primarily what people are talking, and men’s basketball,” Boyle said. “Keep in mind, there’s baseball NIL and softball NIL and volleyball. Those programs also have revenue share, although to a much lesser degree. But when it comes to football, I would put ASU somewhere in the middle of the Big 12.”

NIL transforms college sports

More than four years after NIL rules were first put in place, the impacts on college sports are becoming clear.

“It’s professional sports now,” Boyle said. “I have a kind of thing where, when my clients sign their first deal, I say welcome to professional sports. Like it is that.”

Boyle said contracts from some schools include incentive-based payments.

“You literally see contracts from some schools, not the Big 12, but I have clients across all different Power 4 schools that have, like, incentive-based payments in them,” he said. “Like, if you are the Big Ten Player of the Week, that’s another $10,000. So, these are professional sports contracts.”

When it comes to quarterback Sam Leavitt, Boyle believes his move to LSU is largely about money.

ASU’s NIL progress

Universities do not report their NIL dollars publicly, making exact comparisons difficult. However, Boyle said he has insight from running a NIL agency based in Tempe.

Three years ago, Boyle would have ranked ASU at the bottom of the pack. NIL dollars differ by conference, with SEC and Big Ten deals typically exceeding Big 12 amounts, though the gap has narrowed.

Boyle has insider knowledge from ASU athletes he represents.

“What they were making three years ago is what a lot of the roster makes now. And those are the top paid guys,” he said. “So it’s a notable difference for sure.”

Donations versus business deals

ASU football coach Kenny Dillingham recently spoke at Mountain America Stadium about finding a wealthy person in Phoenix who could give the football program $20 million. However, Boyle said large donations are not the answer.

“If a donor gives $20 million today, what does that do? It’s monopoly money,” Boyle said. “Because that’s not a business deal that has true business value that can be put into NIL go and pass the CSC. That’s a donation. That’s the old model.”

Boyle said a large donation could help offset revenue share costs and provide ASU more money for facilities, but if the university is playing by the rules, such a donation would not help with NIL deals.

Business deals are more important in college sports, according to Boyle.

“I think if businesses get involved and they can pass through the CSC and be true NIL deals, then there are certainly businesses that hopefully would get involved that would significantly increase ASU’s value provide above cap or above market deals,” he said.

Boyle said he expects the current NIL system to continue without significant changes and that fans should get used to the new landscape.

See a spelling or grammatical error in our story? Please click here to report it.

Do you have a photo or video of a breaking news story? Send it to us here with a brief description.



Link

Continue Reading

NIL

Here is the latest Big 12 Conference sports news from The Associated Press

Published

on


The College Sports Commission has rejected nearly $15 million in name, image, likeness agreements since it started evaluating them over the summer, representing…

UNDATED (AP) — The College Sports Commission has rejected nearly $15 million in name, image, likeness agreements since it started evaluating them over the summer, representing more than 10% of the value of all the deals it has analyzed and closed. The CSC says it did not clear 524 deals worth $14.94 million, while clearing 17,321 worth $127.21 million. All the data was current as of Jan. 1. The numbers came against the backdrop of a “reminder” memo the commission sent to athletic directors last week, citing “serious concerns” about contracts being offered to athletes before they had been cleared by the commission through its NIL Go platform.

UNDATED (AP) — Arizona has tightened its hold on the top spot in The Associated Press men’s college basketball poll after Michigan’s loss to Wisconsin. The Wildcats received 60 of 61 first-place votes. Iowa State moved up to No. 2, followed by UConn, Michigan and Purdue. Nebraska moved up two spots to No. 8 to match its highest-ever ranking set in February 1966. Vanderbilt hit No. 10 for its first top-10 ranking since the 2011-12 preseason poll. No. 19 Florida, No. 22 Clemson, No. 23 Utah State and No. 25 Seton Hall were the new additions to the poll. Kansas, SMU and UCF fell out.

UNDATED (AP) — South Carolina climbed to No. 2 in the latest AP women’s basketball Top 25. The reshuffle follows a week where four of the top 10 teams lost. UConn is No. 1. LSU and TCU jumped into the top 10, with LSU moving to No. 6 after beating Texas. Texas dropped to fourth, while No. 5 Vanderbilt has its highest ranking since 2002. Maryland and Oklahoma fall out of the top 10, and Alabama, Notre Dame, and Illinois entered the poll. The SEC leads with nine teams in the Top 25.

Copyright 2025 Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.     



Link

Continue Reading

NIL

Former college football coach Chris Klieman says lack of guardrails around NIL, portal led to retirement

Published

on


Former college football coach Chris Klieman discussed the “factors that drove his decision” to retire, including the lack of guardrails around NIL and the transfer portal, according to Ned Seaton of the Manhattan MERCURY. Klieman said he was “kind of at my wits’ end,” as “anybody can do whatever the heck they want.” He added, “I’ve talked to (many coaches) across the country, we’re all kind of like, ‘We need some guardrails so that somebody can’t spend $45 million, while somebody else is spending 15.” Klieman: “You get done playing Colorado, and come Monday, man, there’s 20 (players’ agents) that want to know a number, or they’re ready to go into the (transfer) portal.” Klieman said for all of December and January he would “work with whatever 80 of our kids to see if we can keep them, and if not, go work with 580 kids to fill the 30 spots we’re going to need,” which to him is “not recruiting.” Klieman: “You’re just putting compensation packages together. … That’s the way college football is, and I’m OK with that, but I don’t have to be a part of it if that’s the way it’s going down.” Klieman said that the issue “needs unified action by university presidents, Congress, and ultimately, a commissioner of college football who could impose and enforce limits and guardrails.” However, he “doesn’t currently see a real path to any of those things, because it will be very difficult to get universal agreement, since those who have the most money have no incentive to sign on” (Manhattan MERCURY, 1/10).



Link

Continue Reading

NIL

Virginia colleges resist disclosing athletic revenue-sharing

Published

on


After two seasons of despair, Virginia Tech football fans finally have something to cheer about.

The administration has launched a major financial commitment to Hokie athletics, a new head football coach is expected to bring a haul of top-flight talent with him from Penn State and, to kick things off, an anonymous fan stepped up last month with a record-setting $20 million donation.

Yet it remains to be seen if all of that will be enough to fulfill Tech’s ambition of competing with top-tier schools that have seemingly unlimited resources to invest in the post-amateur era of collegiate sports.

A court settlement last year was supposed to have brought some order to the wild-west world of Division 1 athletics. For the first time, schools were allowed to share revenue with student-athletes, but the amount per school was capped at $20.5 million a year. But the agreement has done nothing to tame the cost of “name, image and likeness” payments.

Atlantic Coast Conference members like Virginia Tech have mostly stood on the sidelines and watched as a small number of name-brand teams set the market value. 

Last week, Texas Tech inked ex-University of Cincinnati quarterback Brendan Sorsby to a reportedly $5 million deal. The school, flush with West Texas oil boosters, bragged about the deal in a billboard that lit up New York’s Times Square.

Texas Tech, which rode a gusher of NIL money to this year’s College Football Playoff, has budgeted $35 million in combined revenue sharing and NIL payments to athletes in the 2025-26 school year, according to the Athletic.

There’s no way to know how Virginia Tech stacks up.

Officials in Blacksburg have provided few details about its football finances, including how it spends public funds provided by taxpayers and fees extracted from students. Tech is not an outlier when it comes to secrecy; colleges and universities fear that sharing information could provide an unfair advantage to their on-field opponents. 

Reporters in North Carolina have used state open-records laws to determine how other ACC schools are distributing their $20.5 million in shared revenue. 

In Virginia, however, universities have taken a unified stand in refusing to release records related to revenue sharing of public funds. Virginia Tech and other universities have used an expansive interpretation of a “scholastic records” exemption in state open government laws to withhold copies of revenue-sharing agreements or payments, even in cases when news outlets have requested the redaction of all names or other personally identifiable information.

“Even with student names redacted individual student-athletes may be identified,” the Virginia Tech FOIA office responded to a Cardinal News open-records request. “Therefore, the requested records are considered scholastic records concerning identifiable individuals. Accordingly, your request is denied.”

In December, Tech spokesman Mark Owczarski agreed via email to provide a general breakdown showing that 75% of shared revenue went to members of the football team, a higher percentage than at the University of North Carolina and North Carolina State University.

Getting accurate numbers about the value of NIL deals received by Virginia Tech football players is even harder to come by. When the settlement was announced, there was anticipation that the details of any NIL deal valued at $600 or more would be released as part of a new agency set up to make sure the terms reflected market value.

The College Sports Commission, however, has released only a top-level report on the total number of deals approved and the value. The one-page document has no information about the number of deals for any school, much less information about individual NIL arrangements.

For several weeks, Cardinal News sought to schedule a follow-up interview with Owczarski about the finances of Virginia Tech football. His office eventually said it will not make him available. “University leadership is not available for interviews on this topic.”

The lack of official information has given rise to publications that have developed formulas to place an NIL value on highly touted players. Here is what On3 Media has to say about two recent Virginia Tech portal commits:

  • Ethan Grunkemeyer, 6-foot-2-inch, 207-pound quarterback from Lewis Center, Ohio. Grunkemeyer started the final six regular-season games for Penn State last season and led the Nittany Lions to a 22-10 victory over Clemson in the Pinstripe Bowl. He has three years of eligibility left. On3 Media estimates Grunkemeyer’s NIL value at $783,000.
  • Javion Hilson, 6-foot-4-inch, 240-pound defensive end from Cocoa Beach, Florida. Hilson appeared in three games last season with Missouri. Hilson will arrive in Blacksburg with four years of eligibility remaining. On3 Media estimates Hilson’s NIL value at $419,000. 

There’s no way to know if Virginia Tech paid more or less than the On3 Media estimates. 

Kelly Woolwine, the CEO of Triumph NIL, who for several years acted as Virginia Tech’s “defacto general manager” handling negotiations with players and their families, said he learned from experience that “99 percent of what you hear” about NIL values is untrue.

“On the flip side, truth may be stranger than fiction,” Woolwine quipped in a rare interview on the Virginia Tech Sideline podcast in December 2024.

One thing is certain: last fall, many among the Hokie faithful believed the football program had lost its way.

“What was once a great program competing for championships is now a laughingstock,” wrote Robert Irby in “Sons of Saturday,” a website dedicated to Hokie fandom.

Virginia Tech football hit a low in September after a 0-3 start, ending with a 45-25 blowout at the hands of Old Dominion University in Lane Stadium. After the game, Virginia Tech fired head coach Brent Pry.

Two weeks after Pry’s exit, the Virginia Tech Board of Visitors held a special meeting to approve “Invest to Win,” a campaign to inject an additional $229 million into Virginia Tech athletics over the next four years. Figures released by the board show that about half of the funds would come from donations, while $21.3 million would be generated by an increase in student fees. 

“Today, we are stepping up to compete, and we ask our loyal fans and generous donors to step forward with us,” said Virginia Tech President Tim Sands.

In November, fans also cheered news about the hiring of head football coach James Franklin, whom Big Ten powerhouse Penn State had dismissed mid-season. (In an unorthodox twist, Franklin announced he would retain Pry — with whom he had coached at Vanderbilt and Penn State — as his defensive coordinator.)

The coaching change so far has led to a huge net gain for Virginia Tech’s roster. About a half dozen players left the team when Pry was fired, but Franklin has brought talent with him from Penn State.

For instance, Franklin was hired on Nov. 17, a little more than two weeks before top high school players would announce where they would enroll in 2026. In short order, Franklin convinced 11 recruits who had committed to play for him in Happy Valley to change their minds and follow him to Blacksburg. 

As a result, Virginia Tech assembled a 2026 recruiting class that ranked fifth in the ACC, behind Miami, Florida State, North Carolina and Clemson, according to 247 Sports. 

There was more good news on Dec. 15, when Virginia Tech announced that an anonymous donor had agreed to give a record $20 million gift to the athletic department. 

“We are deeply grateful for this extraordinary and timely gift,” Sands said. “Doing more with less, while a testament to the talent of our staff and student athletes, is no longer an option.”

The real test begins this week, as Virginia Tech competes with other schools in a NIL bidding war in the transfer portal. 

Coach Franklin has imported a member of his Penn State staff, Andy Frank, to serve as general manager and assemble the roster for the 2026 version of the Hokies. 

His predecessor, Woolwine, said one of the vexing challenges in major college football today is managing players’ expectations as compensation goes up year after year.

“You’re going to have a program that is going to bring in a guy for $700,000,” Woolwine said in the December 24 podcast, “and on the other side of the line from him is a guy who has been slaving away at that same university for $75,000 a year. How happy is he going to be when he sees that?” 

Woolwine said compensation is by far the biggest locker room distraction in the history of college sports. “It’s bigger than girls, and drugs and partying,” he said.

Players’ concerns about where they stand in compensation can lead to negativity in locker rooms of every major program. “They think their school or their organization was holding out on ‘em, taking advantage of ‘em, sandbagging ‘em. They are very bitter about it,” Woolwine said.

The transfer portal has made it easy for disgruntled players to seek more money and/or playing time elsewhere. This has made it harder for coaches to develop players over time. Underclassmen who have been working toward playing time can find themselves knocked down the depth chart when a school signs players from the portal.

Last season, for instance, only eight of 28 seniors on the Virginia Tech football team played their entire careers in Blacksburg, according to a Cardinal News analysis.

Woolwine said the goal is to find players who are in Blacksburg because they love Virginia Tech. “We don’t have the money to buy our way through this,” Woolwine said in December 2024.

The question remains whether today’s “Invest to Win” will generate the resources that will make it possible for Hokie football to again compete at the highest level. 

The loftiness of Virginia Tech’s goal was reflected in a last-minute edit to the goal of the $229 million infusion to athletics. Instead of wanting to be competitive against the ACC (considered the weakest of the Power Four conferences), Virginia Tech expressed a desire to compete with “the best institutions nationwide.”





Link

Continue Reading

NIL

Scarlet Knights Legend Leonte Carroo Sues Rutgers Over NIL Claims

Published

on


Rutgers football legend Leonte Carroo is suing Rutgers University over the use of his Name, Image, and Likeness from when he was playing in college, according to an article written by Brian Fonseca of Nj.com/NJAdvancedMedia. Carroo’s lawsuit claims that he is entitled to back payments for the money he generated for the university throughout his college career. The lawsuit values those figures between 2.8 and 3 million dollars.

Carroo and his team originally filed the lawsuit in October. In December, Rutgers countered and tried to have the lawsuit dismissed, arguing that the statute of limitations had long passed and that several courts from around the country had already unanimously denied the type of NIL claim that Carroo’s team is making. On January 9th, Carroo’s legal team filed a brief meant to argue that the university’s dismissal should be denied.

Advertisement

According to the article by Fonseca, Carroo’s team gave Rutgers a formal demand letter in June seeking compensation for the unauthorized use of his NIL. The university did not provide such compensation, which led to the lawsuit.

The House vs. NCAA settlement granted back payment to college athletes who were in school between June 2016 and 2024. Carroo’s playing at Rutgers career falls just outside that, as he played from 2012-2015. Carroo’s legal team is arguing that just because he falls outside the period given, it does not take away from the fact that Rutgers unjustly profited from his time as a player.

Carroo was one of the most well-known players at Rutgers while he was playing. He currently holds the receiving touchdowns record in school history by a wide margin, and he was one of the faces of the team when they first entered the Big Ten. Carroo and his legal team argue that some sort of compensation is in order for his level of stardom.

If the courts side with Carroo in this case, it has the potential to open up a whole can of worms across college athletics. It would lay the groundwork and encourage other former athletes from other schools to sue their own school for the same reason. Similar cases to this, including players from other college programs, have been dismissed or denied already across the board. It remains to be seen what will come of this lawsuit in particular.

A link to the original article by Fonseca can be found here.



Link

Continue Reading
Rec Sports4 weeks ago

Stempien to seek opening for Branch County Circuit Court Judge | WTVB | 1590 AM · 95.5 FM

Motorsports4 weeks ago

Ross Brawn to receive Autosport Gold Medal Award at 2026 Autosport Awards, Honouring a Lifetime Shaping Modern F1

Rec Sports4 weeks ago

Princeton Area Community Foundation awards more than $1.3 million to 40 local nonprofits ⋆ Princeton, NJ local news %

NIL4 weeks ago

Downtown Athletic Club of Hawaiʻi gives $300K to Boost the ’Bows NIL fund

Sports3 weeks ago

Badgers news: Wisconsin lands 2nd commitment from transfer portal

Rec Sports2 weeks ago

Five Youth Sports Trends We’re Watching in 2026

Sports4 weeks ago

Badgers news: Final Four Game Thread vs. No. 1 Kentucky Wildcats

Sports4 weeks ago

Beach Volleyball Unveils 2026 Spring Schedule – University of South Carolina Athletics

Sports4 weeks ago

Three Clarkson Volleyball Players Named to CSC Academic All-District List

Sports3 weeks ago

Kentucky VB adds an All-American honorable mention, loses Brooke Bultema to portal

NIL4 weeks ago

Kentucky AD explains NIL, JMI partnership and cap rules

Sports4 weeks ago

Central’s Meyer earns weekly USTFCCCA national honor

Sports3 weeks ago

Is women’s volleyball the SEC’s next big sport? How Kentucky, Texas A&M broke through

Motorsports3 weeks ago

BangShift.com IHRA Acquires Historic Memphis Motorsports Park In Millington Tennessee. Big Race Weekend’s Planned For 2026!

Motorsports4 weeks ago

PRI Show revs through Indy, sets tone for 2026 racing season

Most Viewed Posts

Trending