Connect with us
https://yoursportsnation.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/call-to-1.png

NIL

Why female athletes are challenging the NCAA's $2.8bn settlement

College athletes spent decades fighting for the right to make money from their name, image and likeness (NIL). In 2021, they won. Now, a $2.8bn NCAA settlement is set to compensate hundreds of thousands of current and former athletes who missed out on those earnings. But not everyone thinks the deal is fair. Eight female […]

Published

on

Why female athletes are challenging the NCAA's $2.8bn settlement

College athletes spent decades fighting for the right to make money from their name, image and likeness (NIL). In 2021, they won. Now, a $2.8bn NCAA settlement is set to compensate hundreds of thousands of current and former athletes who missed out on those earnings. But not everyone thinks the deal is fair.

Eight female athletes filed an appeal this week, arguing the agreement violates Title IX, the US law banning sex-based discrimination in education. They say the way the money is divided, largely favoring football and men’s basketball players, shortchanges women by more than $1bn.

Their appeal has paused all back payments, potentially delaying them for more than a year. However, the NCAA’s new plan to allow schools to pay current players directly starting 1 July will still go ahead.

So what does this all mean for athletes as well as the future of college sports? Here’s what’s going on …


What is the NCAA settlement about?

The NCAA agreed to pay $2.8bn to compensate athletes who were previously barred from earning income off their name, image, and likeness (NIL), including things like video game appearances, jersey sales, or social media sponsorships. The settlement covers athletes going back to 2016.

It also clears the way for a major change: beginning 1 July 2025, colleges will be allowed to directly share revenue with current players, up to $20.5 million per school per year.

It’s a major shift from the NCAA’s traditional amateurism model, which argued that athletes should only be compensated with scholarships, not salaries or endorsement income.


Who’s appealing the deal and why?

Eight female athletes who competed in soccer, volleyball, and track have filed an appeal. Their names include Kacie Breeding (Vanderbilt) and Kate Johnson (Virginia), along with six athletes from the College of Charleston.

They argue the deal violates Title IX, the federal law that bans sex-based discrimination in education. Specifically, they say the settlement gives up to 90% of the money to men in football and basketball, depriving women of $1.1bn in rightful compensation.


What is Title IX and how does it apply here?

Title IX is a 1972 US law requiring equal access and treatment for men and women in federally funded education programs, including athletics. Colleges must offer comparable resources, scholarships and participation opportunities across men’s and women’s sports.

The female athletes argue that since NIL bans affected both genders equally, compensation for those bans must also be equitable, and that using historical TV revenue (which favors men’s sports) ignores systemic barriers women have faced in marketing and media exposure.


What did the judge say about the Title IX argument?

US district judge Claudia Wilken approved the settlement last week and rejected Title IX-based objections, saying they fell outside the scope of the antitrust case. The female athletes disagree and are now asking the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals to intervene.


What happens to the money in the meantime?

Because of the appeal, no back pay will be distributed until the court rules. That delay could last several months or longer. According to the NCAA’s lead attorney, the organization will continue funding the settlement pool, but the money will sit untouched until the case is resolved.


Why is most of the money going to men’s football and basketball players?

The current payout formula is based on historical media revenue and licensing data. Because football and men’s basketball generated the majority of money for schools – especially through TV contracts – those athletes stand to receive the most compensation.

Critics say that approach bakes in decades of inequality, because women were denied the same marketing exposure and investment in the first place.


What are the broader concerns about this settlement?

Some worry that schools will cut so-called “non-revenue” sports – like wrestling, swimming or gymnastics – to fund revenue-sharing with top athletes. Others fear this pushes college sports closer to a professional minor league system, undermining education and competitive balance. Still others say that without clear Title IX guidance, women may continue to be marginalized even in a post-amateurism era.


What happens next?

The Ninth Circuit will now review the appeal. Briefs are due by 3 October, and while both sides say they’ll push for speed, appeals in this court have been known to take 12 to 18 months.

Until the case is resolved, no back payments will be made to athletes who played between 2016 and 2021. But the revenue-sharing era is coming, whether or not the NCAA is ready for it.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

NIL

Duke legend drops fiery praise on Mikel Brown Jr. as Louisville hype hits full blast

Mikel Brown Jr. has gone viral this offseason after his performance in the 2025 FIBA U19 World Cup. Brown secured his second gold medal for Team USA and was a crucial piece in the United States’ gold medal run. The 5-star point guard averaged 14.9 points, 6.1 assists, and 2.1 rebounds per game while shooting […]

Published

on


Mikel Brown Jr. has gone viral this offseason after his performance in the 2025 FIBA U19 World Cup. Brown secured his second gold medal for Team USA and was a crucial piece in the United States’ gold medal run.

The 5-star point guard averaged 14.9 points, 6.1 assists, and 2.1 rebounds per game while shooting 46.7 percent from the field and 47.6 percent from beyond the arc. He led Team USA in points, assists, efficiency, and made 3-pointers, and was blatantly snubbed for the MVP award.

A former Duke star and NBA first-round pick went on air and stated Brown was snubbed, but went even further to say Louisville basketball’s incoming freshman has a chance to be the best player in college basketball next season and a future NBA All-Star.

Related: Mikel Brown Jr. brings Louisville exactly what they’ve craved since Donovan Mitchell

Louisville basketball’s Mikel Brown Jr. earns Duke legend’s fiery praise

Brown is emerging as everyone’s favorite point guard in college basketball, and the whole nation has been drooling over him for months now. The 5-star guard is ranked as high as No. 6 in the country and the No. 1 point guard in the 2025 cycle.

Entering the 2025-26 season, it is no surprise that Louisville fans are excited to see the elite point guard play. However, now the whole nation is counting down the days to see Brown in action, as he truly is fun to watch.

Former Duke legend and No. 10 overall pick in the 2012 NBA Draft, Austin Rivers, went on his podcast and gave Brown the biggest praise yet, and hearing it come from a former top 10 pick and a Duke All-American like Rivers has Louisville fans smiling from ear to ear.

“Mikel has talent, bro, like, he shoots the ball like three or four feet behind the line. I’m talking about NBA range now. You don’t see that in high school. His athletic ability has just skyrocketed over the past couple of years. He used to not have that, and now he can go to the lane and punch on you.”

It is no secret that Brown is going to make an immediate impact, but what separates him from other 5-stars is his 3-point shooting, as Rivers stated. When watching his film with Team USA, he was splashing 3-pointers from well beyond the arc, and was able to do it with hands in his face. He won the McDonald’s All-American 3-point contest and shattered the previous record.

The only negative thing people had to say about Brown was his size, and well, they simply can’t anymore.

“He also had a growth spurt,” Rivers stated on Brown. “He went from being this undersized point guard, he is like 6-foot-4 now. He has a size 14 shoe, man, I think the kid might have another inch or two to grow. He can shoot the (expletive) out of the ball, and he has feel, he can pass, this guy has vision, you can’t teach these things. He went to USA, he was the best player there. They gave AJ the MVP. Everybody who knows, who was there, knows Mikel played better than everybody, and was the best player on that team.”

The praise doesn’t just stop there. The former Duke Blue Devil went so far as to say Brown has the chance to be the best college basketball player and an NBA All-Star.

“I truly believe going to a program like Louisville, it is his show. They are going to give him the ball and be like, ‘We are going as far as you take us.’ And he is going to run the show there, man. Mikel Brown has the chance to be the best player out of college next year, and I think he has a chance to be a perennial NBA All-Star. I think he has the chance to be one of the most successful, decorated players in Orlando history.”

Rivers knows what it takes to be successful at the collegiate and pro-level. The Duke legend was a McDonald’s All-American who went on to win ACC Rookie of the Year, earn First-Team All-ACC honors, and be a top-10 pick in the 2012 NBA Draft.

He played 11 seasons in the NBA, with his best season coming in 2017-18, when he averaged 15.1 points, 4.0 assists, 2.4 rebounds while shooting 42 percent from the field and 37 percent from beyond the arc.

Brown’s praise from the former Duke star and NBA vet proves the Cardinals’ 5-star phenom is poised for not only a breakout season but a historic one. As Rivers said, Louisville will go as far as Brown takes them, and after watching his gold medal run, the Louisville fans are hoping for a similar result.

Related: Duke expert just admitted Louisville’s 5-star phenom is a walking nightmare

For all the latest on Louisville basketball’s offseason and recruiting, stay tuned.





Link

Continue Reading

NIL

Back to school? Back to the draft? Shemar Stewart could exploit loophole in chaotic rulebook to burn Bengals

When it comes to rookie contracts in the NFL, there isn’t usually too much negotiation involved. Thanks to the collective bargaining agreement from 2011, every draft contract is essentially slotted due to the rookie wage scale, which means each player knows how much they’re going to make as soon as they get drafted.  What this […]

Published

on


When it comes to rookie contracts in the NFL, there isn’t usually too much negotiation involved. Thanks to the collective bargaining agreement from 2011, every draft contract is essentially slotted due to the rookie wage scale, which means each player knows how much they’re going to make as soon as they get drafted. 

What this means is that negotiating a rookie contract shouldn’t be that difficult, well, unless you’re the Cincinnati Bengals. The Bengals seem to invent new ways to frustrate their fans (and players) every year, and that’s once again happening this year. 

The team’s first-round draft pick, Texas A&M pass rusher Shemar Stewart, showed up at OTAs, but he didn’t participate in a single workout this spring because he still hasn’t signed his contract. He also showed up for the first two days of minicamp during a whirlwind 48 hours where he watched practice before abruptly leaving prior to Thursday’s final session of camp. He didn’t do any on-field activity during those 48 hours, but he did make time to complain about Cincinnat’s front office, which seems to be a theme for Bengals players this offseason. 

Bengals contract drama: Cincinnati may be a title contender, but money issues keep distracting franchise

Cody Benjamin

Bengals contract drama: Cincinnati may be a title contender, but money issues keep distracting franchise

We know this isn’t about the money. Both sides know that Stewart will be signing a four-year, $18.94 million rookie contract that’s fully guaranteed. The 17th overall pick in the 2025 NFL Draft was complaining because the Bengals threw a curveball in their contract negotiations with him by adding new language to his deal that the Bengals didn’t use with their past two first-round picks. The team essentially wants to add a default clause, according to former NFL team executive Andrew Brandt. This would allow the Bengals to void future guarantees if he were to get into trouble (this could be a suspension for on-field conduct, off-field conduct, an arrest or anything else the Bengals can think of). Normally, a first-round pick gets a fully guaranteed four-year contract, but this would give the Bengals some wiggle room to potentially get out of that if he were to get into trouble at any point during his four-year deal. 

Stewart is adamantly against the language being in his contract. 

“I’m 100 percent right,” Stewart said about his stance.”I’m not asking for nothing you all have never done before, but in you all case, you all just want to win an argument instead of winning more games.”

This has created arguably the most acrimonious standoff between a rookie and his team since Joey Bosa held out of Chargers’ training camp for 31 days in 2016, which is the longest holdout by any rookie since the 2011 CBA was implemented. 

The Bengals are playing hardball with Stewart, and in the past, that has usually worked for them, but this time around, Stewart does have at least one bit of leverage that rookies in the past didn’t have: Money. 

  • Stewart’s leverage. For most of NFL history, rookies were generally broke when they entered the league, so many of them would quickly sign their first contract so they could get the signing bonus in their pocket. That’s not the case with Stewart, though. The former Texas A&M star collected plenty of NIL money in college, so he definitely isn’t broke, which means he can afford to wait things out until he can get the Bengals to cave, if that’s what he wants to do. 

If the Bengals aren’t willing to change the language in the contract, that next question becomes: How far would Stewart be willing to go to get what he wants? 

He was asked that question this week and he said “it depends.”

Stewart is the prototype of the money and player empowerment era that’s swept up college football recruiting and college football and has now fully arrived at the NFL. He was a high-profile recruit by the time he was a high school sophomore in Florida, debuting as the No. 1 overall prospect in the class of 2022 in the early rankings (he finished ranked No. 9 overall). He’s comfortable in the spotlight. He’s comfortable talking money — a player of his ilk in college football would have commanded at least $1 million the last few transfer portal cycles, and you can bet Texas A&M’s NIL collectives spent a pretty penny to keep Stewart in the system after its infamous, best-class-money-can-buy 2022 recruiting class fell apart. 

Stewart can hold a grudge, too. There’s a famous card room story about Stewart from his days as a recruit. 

Stewart was a heavy LSU lean and made Baton Rouge his first stop on his official visit circuit. LSU’s operations staff misspelled Stewart’s name on one of the many handouts and greeting pamphlets recruits receive. LSU was never a factor for Stewart after that.

Stewart signed with Texas A&M in somewhat of a Signing Day stunner after hometown Miami made a big push. Texas A&M is believed to have paid more. Stewart’s people, I’ve heard this week, are driven by the principle that they want what they think they deserve and they will not compromise if they don’t get it. 

Stewart has several options and he could quickly turn into the Bengals’ (and NFL’s) worst nightmare if he decides to go with a nuclear option of re-entering the draft next year, a process that is outlined in article 6 of the CBA. 

Here’s a look at two of his options he would have if he doesn’t want to sign with the Bengals:  

  • He could re-enter the NFL Draft. If Stewart doesn’t sign his contract and he doesn’t play football at all in 2025, he could re-enter the NFL Draft in 2026. If he went this route, it means that any team could draft him next year, except for the Bengals. If a player were to successfully pull off a power move like this, it could throw a wrench into the future of the draft. It would set up potential situations where a player could sit out if he got drafted by a team he didn’t want to play for. Stewart would essentially have until November to make a decision on this. He’s allowed to sign his rookie contract until the Tuesday following Week 10. If he doesn’t sign it by that date, then he’s not allowed to play in 2025. There’s another upside to this strategy: If Stewart went undrafted in 2026 — maybe his situation with the Bengals scares other teams away — then he would become an undrafted free agent following the 2026 draft and he’d be free to sign with any team. 
  • He could ask for a trade. If the Bengals won’t give him the contract language he wants, maybe someone else will. There is a unique deadline in place for any team that wants to trade a rookie: A deal has to be made at least 30 days before the start of the regular season, so a decision would have to be made here by Aug. 5 or Aug. 8 (The CBA isn’t clear if it’s 30 days before the start of the first game of the regular season or 30 days before the Bengals’ first game of the season). The Bengals don’t like being bullied, so this scenario would probably be unlikely, but it would be an option. 

Those are the two most practical options, but there’s also a wild card option: Stewart could try to return to Texas A&M for his senior year. 

During Monday’s episode of the Cover 3 podcast, CBS Sports college analyst Bud Elliott noted that Stewart has actually been working out at Texas A&M this summer. 

“A guy who has had some good A&M stuff in the past, he hit me, he’s like, ‘Hey, Shemar might end up back here,'” Elliott said.

Elliott then said his source had a few more nuggets. 

“‘He’s been at College Station, he’s been fully involved in workouts, He’s holding out from the Bengals, (the) relationship is toxic. He could try to come back and play again this season and go into the draft again next year.'” 

The NCAA has rules against a player returning to college once they’ve been drafted, so he would likely be facing a legal battle if he went this route, but it could be something that he’s considering. And as Elliott noted, it seems that everything with the NCAA is subject to litigation right now, so Stewart could certainly come out victorious if he decided to go to court. 

Stewart could also head to the CFL to stay in football shape, but he likely wouldn’t go that route, because if he signs with another professional football league, that would give his NFL rights to the Bengals for the next three years. 

The most likely scenario is that the two sides agree to a deal, but as the Bosa situation proved, these things can drag on. When the Bengals are dug in on something, they don’t usually budge, so it will be interesting to see who wins this multi-million dollar game of chicken. 

The Bengals have had a history of slow starts under Zac Taylor and part of that has had to do with contentious contract negotiations. Ja’Marr Chase sat out of training camp last year due to unhappiness with his contract and the Bengals offense looked out of sync to start the season. 

Even Joe Burrow seems to be getting tired of the distractions. The QB was asked if Trey Hendrickson’s absence was a distraction and he answered with two words: “Of course.”

“Last year, we had two. This year, we have one,” Burrow said of the holdouts the Bengals have dealt with. “So we do have less. You’d love to have none, but that’s life in the NFL.”

If you’re scoring at home, that means the Bengals sack leader from 2024 (Hendrickson) and the pass rusher who’s supposed to complement him on the defense (Stewart) are both sitting out. 

The Bengals had one of the worst defenses in the NFL last season, and now, there’s a chance that Stewart and Hendrickson could both possibly sit out training camp, which certainly won’t make the unit better. It’s another frustrating offseason for Bengals fans, who are probably used to it at this point. 





Link

Continue Reading

NIL

Keldric Faulk Helps Pay Walk-On’s Tuition With NIL Paycheck

© Jordan Godfree-Imagn Images Audio By Carbonatix Keldric Faulk may very well be the best teammate in college football. The Auburn star had a telling admission while in Atlanta for SEC Media Days. The edge rusher gave a portion of his own personal NIL paycheck to a walk-on player on the Tigers roster. He showed […]

Published

on


Keldric Faulk of Auburn at SEC Media Days

© Jordan Godfree-Imagn Images

Carbonatix Pre-Player Loader

Audio By Carbonatix

Keldric Faulk may very well be the best teammate in college football. The Auburn star had a telling admission while in Atlanta for SEC Media Days.

The edge rusher gave a portion of his own personal NIL paycheck to a walk-on player on the Tigers roster. He showed his selflessness by helping a friend in need.

Faulk is one of the top players on the Auburn defense. The junior racked up 45 tackles a year ago, 11 of which came behind the line of scrimmage. An absolute menace for opposing backfields, he tallied seven sacks.

The pass rusher hopes to become a first-round NFL Draft pick when all is said and done. He’ll have the option to leave after the 2025 campaign with another big year. And there’s certainly a buzz surrounding his professional future.

ESPN’s Jordan Reid tabbed the third-year player as a Top 10 pick in his first 2026 mock draft.

“Faulk [is] a 6-6 edge rusher with a stout base. He can play multiple alignments… He’s already one of the best run defenders in the country.”

-Jordan Reid

CBS Sports echoed that outlook, projecting him to go No. 7 overall. “Faulk has prototypical size for a power edge,” the site wrote.

Keldric Faulk is a star both on and off the field.

The defender knows that he’s been blessed with elite God-given abilities. Those football traits have already translated to NIL wealth. They’ll have a chance to help him land a professional paycheck someday, too.

Faulk understands that not everyone is as fortunate as he is. So, when a teammate needed help, he offered a helping hand.

“Whenever I did help him out, it was a great thing for me, just to help somebody else just because I’ve been blessed so much. To bless him and help him out in his time of need, it was one of the best things I ever did.”

-Keldric Faulk

Hugh Freeze spoke highly of Faulk.

The head coach commented further on his superstar’s generosity. He expects nothing less.

“Keldric, many people don’t know, is also one of the most giving and unselfish people I know,” Freeze said. “He helped one of our current walk-ons the other day with some of his NIL money who was having a hard time trying to stay in school. That’s the kind of guy he is, and we’re fortunate to have him.”

Freeze confirmed that a walk-on player was having trouble with tuition and other college expenses. Keldric Faulk stepped in without hesitation.

On3 Sports currently puts the defender’s NIL valuation at $1 million. He decided he didn’t need it all for himself. It’s something we’ve seen in the past from other college football stars.

Heisman trophy winner Travis Hunter reportedly funded NIL salaries of 10-15 teammates at Colorado last year without taking a dime from the school’s collective. He earned his money through outside endorsements and decided to share the wealth.

Hunter would go onto become a first-round NFL Draft pick following a monster junior year. Many hope to see the same for Faulk.





Link

Continue Reading

NIL

Charles Barkley Calls NCAA ‘A Bunch Of Idiots’ Because Of NIL

Add NBA Hall of Famer Charles Barkley to the growing list of people upset with the direction of college athletics. The outspoken Barkley did not hold back in his assessment, calling the NCAA “a bunch of idiots” in response to the major transformation in college athletics, particularly the arrival of Name, Image and Likeness revenue […]

Published

on


Add NBA Hall of Famer Charles Barkley to the growing list of people upset with the direction of college athletics.

The outspoken Barkley did not hold back in his assessment, calling the NCAA “a bunch of idiots” in response to the major transformation in college athletics, particularly the arrival of Name, Image and Likeness revenue for student-athletes and the Transfer Portal, which has brought free agency to the NCAA.

“College athletics is so f—d up right now,” Barkley said in a recent interview with AL.com. “I don’t know what they’re gonna do to fix this thing. It’s out of control. I don’t know how you’re gonna put toothpaste back in the tube.”

NIL revenue has dramatically changed the culture of college sports with athletes pursuing schools based on the amount of NIL money a school is offering. High school athletes are now bringing agents and financial advisors to the table when talking to college coaches and recruiters. 

Barkley isn’t the only high-profile sports figure concerned with the impact NIL is having on college athletics, specifically football and basketball, the NCAA’s highest revenue sports. University of Colorado football coach Deion Sanders wants the NCAA to consider implementing a “salary cap” to regulate how much NIL money schools can have in their budgets.

Barkley said the current state of college athletics has caused him to modify his financial commitments to Auburn University, his alma mater. Barkley has been a longtime contributor to the athletic programs at Auburn, where he played from 1981-84.

“There’s not a single person in the world who has given more money to Auburn, legal or illegal, than me,” Barkley said. “But the notion that I’m gonna give millions of dollars every year to Auburn to help them be good in basketball and football…that’s not gonna happen. Anybody who thinks that is just stupid.”

Barkley left Auburn after his junior year. He was the No. 5 overall pick in the 1984 draft by Philadelphia.

Ray Richardson is a contributor to Back In Day Hoops On SI. He can be reached at RayRich55@gmail.com

Follow our coverage on Facebook  or X: @RayRich55



Link

Continue Reading

NIL

Top NIL Deals – July 7, 2025

Data provided by Student Athlete Score (July 15th, 2025) – Each week, we highlight NIL (Name, Image, and Likeness) deals signed by college athletes across the country, powered by verified data from Student Athlete Score. The week of July 7th, 2025, featured high-profile partnerships from powerhouse brands like EA SPORTS, C4 Energy, and Hoka. Standout […]

Published

on


Data provided by Student Athlete Score

(July 15th, 2025) – Each week, we highlight NIL (Name, Image, and Likeness) deals signed by college athletes across the country, powered by verified data from Student Athlete Score. The week of July 7th, 2025, featured high-profile partnerships from powerhouse brands like EA SPORTS, C4 Energy, and Hoka. Standout athletes from LSU Football, North Carolina Basketball, Colorado Track & Field, and more made headlines with new NIL opportunities, reflecting the continued evolution of athlete brand power across multiple sports and schools.



Link

Continue Reading

NIL

Sounding Off on Soccer Podcast: Pitt WSOC in transition with Ben and Randy Waldrum

Photo courtesy John Krysinsky In May, Pitt women’s soccer program announced an official change in leadership, with Randy Waldrum stepping into a new role as Technical Director, while Ben Waldrum is taking over as the team’s Head Coach. All in the family: Pitt Women’s Soccer names Ben Waldrum head coach For the first time since […]

Published

on





Photo courtesy John Krysinsky

In May, Pitt women’s soccer program announced an official change in leadership, with Randy Waldrum stepping into a new role as Technical Director, while Ben Waldrum is taking over as the team’s Head Coach.

All in the family: Pitt Women’s Soccer names Ben Waldrum head coach

For the first time since the transition took place, Pittsburgh Soccer Now‘s John Krysinsky had a chance to visit Pitt’s Peterson Sports Complex and sit down with the father and son duo who have led Pitt women’s soccer to its most successful era and has reached its greatest heights since they arrived in 2018.

In this exclusive, in-depth interview, which can be heard on Podcast formats in two parts and one part on PSN’s YouTube Channel, among the topics discussed included:

Audio Podcast Part I

Audio Podcast Part II

  • Final thoughts on last season and the program’s make-up in what will also be a transitional season with many new faces along with some key returnees
  • What are three qualities that stand out to Randy and Ben about each other

and much more.

AUDIO PODCAST PART I

AUDIO PODCAST PART II 

More Options »

Pulse of Pittsburgh Soccer: NCAA roster size changes for 2025 add twist to mid-year movement

* What is the House Settlement? 

Grant House is a former Arizona State swimmer who sued the defendants (the NCAA and the five biggest athletic conferences in the nation). His lawsuit and two others were combined and over several years the dispute wound up with the settlement that ends a decades-old prohibition on schools cutting checks directly to athletes. Now, each school will be able to make payments to athletes for use of their name, image and likeness (NIL). For reference, there are nearly 200,000 athletes and 350 schools in Division I alone and 500,000 and 1,100 schools across the entire NCAA.

In Year 1, each school can share up to about $20.5 million with their athletes, a number that represents 22% of their revenue from things like media rights, ticket sales and sponsorships. Alabama athletic director Greg Byrne famously told Congress “those are resources and revenues that don’t exist.” Some of the money will come via ever-growing TV rights packages, especially for the College Football Playoff. But some schools are increasing costs to fans through “talent fees,” concession price hikes and “athletic fees” added to tuition costs.




John Krysinsky has covered soccer and other sports for many years for various publications and media outlets. He is also author of ‘Miracle on the Mon’ — a book about the Pittsburgh Riverhounds SC, which chronicles the club, particularly the early years of Highmark Stadium with the narrative leading up to and centered around a remarkable match that helped provide a spark for the franchise. John has covered sports for Pittsburgh Tribune-Review, DK Pittsburgh Sports, Pittsburgh Sports Report, has served as color commentator on Pittsburgh Riverhounds SC broadcasts, and worked with OPTA Stats and broadcast teams for US Open Cup and International Champions Cup matches held in the US. Krysinsky also served as the Head Men’s Soccer Coach at his alma mater, Point Park University, where he led the Pioneers to the first-ever winning seasons and playoff berths (1996-98); head coach of North Catholic boys (2007-08), associate head coach of Shady Side Academy boys (2009-2014).




Link

Continue Reading

Most Viewed Posts

Trending