Connect with us
https://yoursportsnation.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/call-to-1.png

Sports

The Economics of College Athletics

Published

on

The Economics of College Athletics

When you think about college athletics, it’s easy to focus on the excitement of the games, but the financial side is just as essential. You might wonder how programs juggle revenue from ticket sales, sponsorships, and broadcast rights while managing hefty expenses related to coaching and facilities. As regulations like Title IX add complexity to funding structures, the situation becomes even trickier. Understanding these dynamics is key for the future of college sports, and the implications are far-reaching—so what does this mean for the sustainability of programs across the country?

Overview of College Athletics Economics

When you plunge into the economics of college athletics, you quickly uncover a complex landscape shaped by revenue generation, expenses, and market dynamics. At the core, colleges face a constant balancing act between funding their athletic programs and ensuring compliance with Title IX regulations. These regulations mandate equal opportunities for both male and female athletes, which greatly influences budget allocations.

Analyzing expenditure patterns reveals that personnel costs, including coaching staff salaries and administrative expenses, often consume a large portion of an athletic department’s budget. In fact, data shows that coaching salaries in top-tier programs can exceed millions annually, driving overall costs higher.

Additionally, facilities and infrastructure investments are essential for attracting recruits and generating fan engagement, further complicating financial planning. You’ll find that athletic departments often rely on institutional support, fundraising, and sponsorships to cover deficits.

Market dynamics also play a significant role. Competition among schools for top talent and media rights can distort financial priorities, often leading to unsustainable spending.

Understanding these factors is imperative for grasping the broader economic implications of college athletics, where financial decisions can directly impact the student-athlete experience and institutional reputation.

Major Revenue Sources

Athletic departments generate revenue through several major sources, each contributing to the overall financial health of college sports programs.

Ticket sales often stand out as a significant source, providing direct income from fans attending games. According to recent data, ticket sales can account for 15-25% of total revenue, heavily influenced by the popularity of the sport and the size of the institution.

Sponsorship deals represent another vital revenue stream. Corporations are willing to invest in college athletics, seeing value in brand visibility and community engagement. These partnerships can yield millions, with reports indicating that top programs generate over $10 million annually from sponsorships alone.

Merchandising also plays an important role, as fans purchase team apparel and memorabilia. This can contribute up to 5% of total revenue, depending on the institution’s marketability and fan base loyalty.

Television Contracts Explained

Television contracts have become a cornerstone of financial stability for college athletics, noticeably impacting revenue streams. These agreements often involve substantial sums, frequently reaching hundreds of millions of dollars over multiple years. For example, conferences like the SEC and Big Ten have secured lucrative deals that can considerably elevate their institutional budgets.

When you analyze these contracts, you’ll find that they typically include provisions for regular season games, playoffs, and bowl games, which enhances their value. The popularity of college sports, particularly football and basketball, drives viewership ratings, making these contracts highly sought after by networks.

Furthermore, the revenue generated from television rights not only supports athletic programs but also funds scholarships, facilities, and coaching staff salaries. It’s important to note that the financial impact varies by institution; schools in power conferences tend to reap more from their deals compared to those in smaller conferences.

In essence, television contracts are critical for sustaining and growing college athletic programs, ensuring they remain competitive on both the field and financially. Understanding this dynamic is fundamental for grasping the broader economic landscape of college athletics.

Sponsorship and Advertising Income

As college athletics increasingly rely on diverse revenue streams, sponsorship and advertising income has emerged as a significant contributor to financial sustainability. This income often comes from partnerships with corporations and brands keen to tap into the passionate college sports fan base.

The financial implications are substantial, as schools can leverage this income in several ways:

  1. Brand Visibility: Sponsors get their logos displayed on uniforms, banners, and digital platforms, enhancing their reach.
  2. Event Sponsorships: Companies can sponsor specific events or tournaments, creating a direct connection with audiences.
  3. Digital Advertising: Universities often sell ad space on their websites and mobile apps, generating additional revenue.
  4. Merchandising Collaborations: Schools collaborate with brands to create co-branded merchandise, attracting both fans and profit.

The data shows that institutions generating significant sponsorship income often have extensive marketing strategies in place.

These strategies include engaging social media campaigns and targeted outreach to alumni and local businesses. By effectively managing these relationships, colleges not only improve their financial health but also strengthen community ties, ensuring a win-win scenario for both parties involved.

Ticket Sales and Game Day Revenue

Ticket sales and game day revenue represent essential financial pillars for college athletic programs, greatly impacting their overall budgets. For many institutions, these revenues can account for a considerable portion of total income, especially at schools with strong football and basketball programs. According to a recent National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) report, ticket sales can contribute anywhere from 20% to 40% of a program’s annual revenue, depending on the sport and the institution’s market size.

You’ll find that game day revenue isn’t limited to ticket sales alone. Concessions, parking fees, and merchandise sales also play important roles in enhancing total game day income. For instance, research indicates that programs with dedicated marketing strategies can increase game day revenue by as much as 25%.

However, factors such as team performance, opponent quality, and even weather conditions can greatly influence attendance and, consequently, revenue.

In an era where budgets are tightening, understanding the dynamics of ticket sales and game day revenue is essential. Programs must continuously innovate and engage fans to maximize this revenue stream, ensuring their financial viability in a competitive landscape.

Student-Athlete Scholarships Costs

When examining the financial structure of college athletics, the costs associated with student-athlete scholarships stand out as a notable expenditure. These scholarships aren’t just a line item; they represent a fundamental investment in student-athletes, often reaching millions of dollars annually.

The financial implications can be broken down into several key components:

  1. Tuition and Fees: Covering the cost of education, which varies by institution, can range from $10,000 to over $60,000 per year.
  2. Room and Board: Providing housing and meals is essential, adding an additional $15,000 to $25,000 annually.
  3. Books and Supplies: Educational resources can cost between $500 and $1,500 each academic year.
  4. Health Insurance: Ensuring student-athletes are covered adds another $2,000 to $5,000 to the overall scholarship cost.

Together, these components can total anywhere from $27,500 to over $91,500 per student-athlete, depending on the institution.

As you analyze these figures, it becomes clear that the financial burden of scholarships appreciably influences budgets and resource allocation within athletic programs. Understanding these costs is essential for grasping the broader economic picture of college athletics.

Facility Maintenance and Upgrades

Facility maintenance and upgrades play a critical role in the sustainability and success of college athletics programs. You need to understand that well-maintained facilities not only enhance the athlete experience but also attract potential recruits and fans.

According to a 2021 report, colleges that invest in facility upgrades see a 15-20% increase in attendance at sporting events, translating to significant revenue boosts from ticket sales and concessions.

Investing in modern training facilities and stadiums also leads to long-term cost savings. For instance, energy-efficient upgrades can reduce utility expenses by up to 30%. Additionally, maintaining facilities can prevent costly repairs down the line.

A study from the NCAA indicates that schools with proactive maintenance budgets experience fewer emergency repairs, allowing them to allocate funds to other critical areas.

You should also consider the impact of facilities on branding. High-quality facilities can enhance a school’s reputation, making it more appealing to sponsors and donors.

Coaching Salaries and Staff Expenses

The connection between facility investments and overall program success extends to coaching salaries and staff expenses, which are among the largest expenditures for college athletics programs.

These costs can considerably influence a program’s ability to attract and retain top talent, both on the field and in coaching roles.

When you analyze coaching salaries and staff expenses, consider these four key components:

  1. Head Coach Salaries: Often the most visible expense, head coaches command considerable salaries that reflect their experience and the program’s potential for success.
  2. Assistant Coach Salaries: These salaries are essential too, as strong support staff can enhance player development and recruitment efforts.
  3. Support Staff Wages: This includes athletic trainers, analysts, and other important roles that contribute to the athletes’ performance and wellbeing.
  4. Recruiting Expenses: These costs can vary widely, but investing in recruiting staff and travel can directly impact the quality of incoming talent.

Understanding these financial commitments helps you grasp how institutions prioritize resources.

Effective management of coaching salaries and staff expenses is critical for sustaining competitive programs in an increasingly demanding landscape.

Compliance and Regulatory Costs

Compliance and regulatory costs represent a significant financial burden for college athletics programs, often requiring institutions to allocate substantial resources to meet various legal and ethical standards.

You’ll find that these costs stem from adhering to NCAA regulations, Title IX requirements, and state laws, which mandate equitable treatment of all student-athletes.

In recent years, compliance infrastructure has become increasingly complex, necessitating hiring additional staff or engaging external consultants to navigate these regulations effectively.

According to a study by the NCAA, institutions spend an average of $1.5 million annually on compliance activities. This figure can vary widely based on the size of the athletic program and the number of sports offered.

Furthermore, failure to comply with regulations can lead to severe penalties, including fines, loss of scholarships, or even disqualification from competitions.

Consequently, investing in compliance isn’t just an expense; it’s an essential safeguard that protects the institution’s reputation and financial stability.

As you analyze the overall budget for college athletics, understanding these compliance and regulatory costs is vital. They play a pivotal role in shaping the financial landscape and operational strategies of athletic programs across the country.

Fundraising and Alumni Contributions

Successful fundraising and robust alumni contributions are essential for the financial health of college athletics programs. These efforts not only bridge funding gaps but also enhance the overall student-athlete experience. You might be surprised to learn that a significant portion of athletic budgets comes from these sources.

Consider the following factors that drive successful fundraising campaigns and alumni contributions:

  1. Engagement Events: Hosting events like alumni games or fundraisers cultivates a sense of community and loyalty.
  2. Targeted Campaigns: Initiatives focused on specific needs, such as facility upgrades or scholarships, can resonate more with donors.
  3. Personalized Communication: Tailored outreach to alumni, highlighting their impact, fosters stronger connections and encourages giving.
  4. Recognition Programs: Acknowledging contributions through donor walls or exclusive events can motivate alumni to give more generously.

In 2021, schools with robust fundraising strategies reported an average increase of 15% in alumni contributions compared to previous years.

This data highlights the importance of strategic outreach and engagement in securing necessary financial support for athletic programs. Similarly, if you’re exploring sports entrepreneurship in the Middle East, a Guide on Starting a Sports Business in KSA can provide valuable insights into navigating the region’s unique economic and regulatory landscape.

Impact of Title IX on Funding

Fundraising efforts in college athletics are increasingly influenced by Title IX, which mandates gender equity in educational programs, including sports. Compliance with Title IX requires institutions to allocate resources fairly between men’s and women’s athletic programs. This has led many universities to reassess their funding strategies, ensuring they meet the legal standards while also appealing to a broader donor base.

Data shows that schools investing in women’s sports often experience increased support from alumni and local communities. In recent years, the rise of women’s sports, highlighted by successful programs and professional leagues, has shifted public perception, creating more opportunities for sponsorships and partnerships.

Additionally, schools that prioritize equitable funding can enhance their overall brand, attracting not only potential athletes but also prospective students who value inclusivity.

However, challenges persist. Some institutions struggle to balance their budgets while complying with Title IX. This often results in difficult decisions regarding program cuts or resource reallocation.

Ultimately, Title IX’s impact on funding in college athletics underscores the necessity for strategic planning and innovative fundraising approaches to maintain compliance and foster growth across all sports.

Financial Disparities Among Programs

When examining financial disparities among college athletic programs, it’s clear that not all institutions are created equal. Factors such as geographic location, institutional size, and market demand greatly influence revenue generation and resource allocation.

You may notice notable differences in:

  1. Revenue Sources: Larger schools often benefit from lucrative broadcasting deals, while smaller programs may rely heavily on student fees and donations.
  2. Sponsorship Opportunities: High-profile institutions attract major corporate partnerships, generating considerable additional income that lesser-known programs simply can’t match.
  3. Facility Investments: Wealthier programs invest in state-of-the-art facilities, enhancing recruitment and retention, which perpetuates a cycle of financial advantage.
  4. Fan Engagement and Attendance: Schools with strong fan bases can generate higher ticket sales and merchandise revenue, further widening the financial gap.

These disparities not only impact the athletic performance of programs but also affect student-athlete experiences. As resources become increasingly concentrated among a few elite programs, the divide between them and their less fortunate counterparts continues to grow, raising questions about equity and sustainability in college athletics.

Understanding these financial dynamics is essential for addressing the challenges faced by various programs across the nation.

Future Trends in College Athletics

As college athletics evolves, several key trends are shaping the future landscape of the industry.

One significant trend is the increasing reliance on digital platforms for revenue generation. With the rise of streaming services and social media, schools are exploring new avenues for broadcasting games and engaging fans. Data shows that institutions leveraging these platforms see enhanced brand visibility and potential revenue boosts.

Another trend is the growing emphasis on athlete compensation. Changes in legislation, such as the NCAA’s name, image, and likeness (NIL) rules, are altering the financial dynamics of college sports. Athletes can now monetize their personal brands, which could lead to increased competition among programs for top talent.

Moreover, the focus on mental health and well-being is gaining traction. As institutions recognize the importance of student-athlete welfare, investments in support services are likely to increase, impacting budgets and priorities.

Conclusion

Ultimately, maneuvering the economics of college athletics requires a strategic approach to balancing revenue and expenditures. For example, the University of Texas generates substantial income through its lucrative Longhorn Network, which greatly boosts its athletic budget, allowing for enhanced facilities and scholarships. However, this financial advantage highlights disparities among programs, emphasizing the need for equitable funding strategies to guarantee all sports thrive. As the landscape evolves, understanding these dynamics will be essential for sustainable success.

Photo Source: https://www.pexels.com/photo/photo-of-a-woman-jumped-on-obstacle-3764164/

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sports

Three Podiums Highlight Season Opening Alpine Action

Published

on


GEORGETOWN, Colo. – The Colorado Buffaloes ski team opened the alpine portion of the season with three podium finishes Monday in the slalom races at Loveland Ski Area as part of the Denver Invitational.

The Buffaloes earned runner-up finishes in both the men’s and women’s races, highlighted by Louison Accambray’s career-best second-place finish on the women’s side and a 2–3 showing from freshmen Stanley Buzek and Feb Allasina in the men’s race. Through two of eight alpine races this week, Colorado sits second in the team standings.

Accambray led the CU women, while Alexa Brownlie finished seventh, Hannah Soria placed 14th and Cathinka Lunder finished 16th. Paige DeHart did not finish her first run.

On the men’s side, Colorado faced adversity early, as Justin Bigatel and Christoffer Oestroem did not finish the first run, while Filip Wahlqvist crashed just five gates from the finish on the second run after holding a sizeable lead following the opening run. Despite the setbacks, Buzek and Allasina delivered podium performances to keep the Buffs firmly in contention.  It was the first time two alpine newcomers were on the podium in their first college race since 2007 when Drew Roberts and Stefan Hughes went 1-2 in a slalom race at Utah.

HOW IT HAPPENED

The CU women were first on the course and posted a solid opening run before surging in the second run. Accambray climbed from sixth after the first run to finish second overall, while Brownlie jumped from 16th to seventh and Soria made a significant move from 23rd to 14th. Lunder remained steady throughout the race, sitting 14th after the first run and finishing 16th. Collectively, the three skiers gained 22 positions between runs, with Soria posting the fourth-fastest second run and Brownlie recording the fifth-fastest.

In the men’s race, early first-run exits by Bigatel and Oestroem placed increased pressure on the remaining Buffs, and both Buzek and Allasina responded. Allasina surged from a starting position of 35 to 15th after the first run, then vaulted into third place with one of the fastest second runs in the field. Buzek, who started 16th, was third after the first run and moved up one position to finish second. Buzek recorded the second-fastest second run, while Allasina posted the third-fastest.

UP NEXT

Colorado remains at Loveland Ski Area on Tuesday for another set of slalom races as part of the Spencer James Nelson Memorial Colorado Invitational before heading to Aspen for giant slalom races Wednesday and Thursday.

WHAT IT MEANS

The somewhat short-handed alpine teams had a solid season opening performance, with some highs (two freshmen on the podium, career-best finish for Accambray) and lows (Filip Wahlqvist crashing five gates from the finish, three DNFs on the men’s side), which is the nature of the business for all skiers, especially alpine skiers.  But CU did place four women in the top 16 and despite only scoring two men, still are just eight points out of the lead.  A solid start to the alpine season.

 

TEAM NOTES

SKIER NOTES

  • Louison Accambray finished second for her career-best slalom result and sixth podium finish overall, including her second slalom podium, in 15 career races.
  • Alexa Brownlie / Hannah Soria both made strong collegiate debuts for Colorado, with Brownlie placing seventh in her first college race and Soria finishing 14th. For Soria, the result marked her 10th career top-20 finish in her 19th collegiate slalom race.
  • Cathinka Lunder placed 16th, recording her fourth career top-20 finish and second in slalom. It marked her second-best slalom finish, trailing only a 12th-place result at Loveland in a qualifier race last season.
  • Stanley Buzek / Feb Allasina both reached the podium in their first collegiate race, with Buzek finishing second and Allasina third. It marked the first time two alpine newcomers finished on the podium in the season-opening race since Drew Roberts and Stefan Hughes went 1–2 in the Utah slalom opener in 2007.

TEAM SCORES (DAY 1): 1. Denver, 163; 2. Colorado, 155; 3. Utah, 127.5; 4. Alaska Anchorage, 125; 5. Montana State, 110; 6. Colorado Mountain, 104; 7. Nevada, 92.5; 8. Westminster, 30.

WOMEN’S SLALOM: 1. Sara Rask, Denver, 1:29.20; 2. Louison Accambray, Colorado, 1:29.66; 3. Elisabeth Creighton, Denver, 1:30.05; 3. Mia Hunt, Denver, 1:30.05; 5. Ella Bromee, Alaska Anchorage, 1:30.11; 6. Stella Buchheister, Denver, 1:30.18; 7. Alexa Brownlie, Colorado, 1:30.20; 8. Carmen Nielsen, Alaska Anchorage, 1:30.22; 9. Nicola Rountree-Williams, Denver, 1:30.36; 10. Tea Kiesel, Montana State, 1:30.45.

Other CU Finishers: 14. Hannah Soria, 1:31.19; 16. Cathinka Lunder, 1:31.40; Paige DeHart, DNF (Run 1).

MEN’S SLALOM: 1. Johs Herland, Utah, 1:29.59; 2. Stanley Buzek, Colorado, 1:30.29; 3. Feb Allasina, Colorado, 1:31.00; 4. Lucas Ellis, Colorado Mountain, 1:31.05; 5. Pierick Charest, Utah, 1:31.34; 6. Harry Hoffman, Utah, 1:31.38; 7. Sindre Myklebust, Utah, 1:31.64; 8. Adrian Hunshammer, Denver, 1:31.78; 9. Bosse Mikelsson, Montana State, 1:31.79; 10. Giorgio Baldo, Alaska Anchorage, 1:32.02.

Other CU Finishers: Filip Wahlqvist, DNF (Run 2); Justin Bigatel, DNF (Run 1); Christoffer Oestroem, DNF (Run 1).

 



Link

Continue Reading

Sports

Men’s And Women’s Track And Field Come Out On Top In Final Home Meet

Published

on


HANOVER, N.H. – The Dartmouth men’s and women’s track and field teams hosted the Ivy vs. America East Challenge, marking their final home meet of the indoor season. 

Both teams had impressive finishes, placing first overall. The women wrapped up the meet with a final score of 73.83, while the men finished with a score of 63. 

Andie Murray won the women’s 500m, finishing the race in 1:15.39. Emmy Thornton clinched the 800m with a final time of 2:20.65. Claire McDonald placed first in the 3000m with her 9:59.68 mark. Mariella Schweitzer won the 60m hurdles with an impressive 8.67 finish, as well as the long jump with a 5.97 mark. 

Charlotte DiRocco secured points for Dartmouth after clearing 1.65m in the high jump, finishing in first place. Similarly, Ellison Weiner cleared 3.65m to clinch first place in the pole vault. As for the throws, Kylee Bennett and Zaneta Pivcova clinched the weight throw and shot put, with 15.41m and 14.54m marks, respectively. 

Jack Rousseau won the 400m for the men with his final time of 50.13, followed by Noe Kemper clinching the 800m with a 1:54.31 finish. Michael Bueker, Keion Grieve, Jack Inglis and Jack Intihar clinched the men’s 4×4 with a 3:27.64 finish. As for the jumps, David Adams cleared 4.95m to clinch the pole vault for the Big Green, Intihar clinched the long jump 7.14m mark and Roy Leibovitz won the triple jump with a 15.45m mark, which is good for No. 14 in the nation. 

Colton McMaster rounded out the meet for the men, clinching the shot put and weight throw with 17.53m and 19.17m marks, respectively.

The Big Green will return to action when heading to New Haven, Conn., for the annual Dartmouth-Yale-Columbia meet on Saturday, Jan. 17.



Link

Continue Reading

Sports

University of Georgia set to dedicate new track and field facility Feb. 18 | Georgia Sports

Published

on


A brand-new track and field facility will open in Athens on Feb. 18, aiming to serve both the University of Georgia campus and the local community, according to its athletic department.

Located on South Milledge Avenue, the complex will feature a 400-meter, nine-lane Spec Towns Track with an infield long jump, a triple jump and a pole vault facility. The venue will have a capacity of 2,500 that can accommodate up to 4,000 for select events with a grandstand, a press box, an observation deck, restrooms and concession stands.

The new venue replaces the old one on South Lumpkin Street, which had not hosted an event for the Georgia men’s or women’s track and field team since April 2023. Now, the Bulldogs are slated to host the Spec Towns Invitational at the new complex this April, the Torrin Lawrence Memorial in May and the SEC championships in 2027. 

High school competitions will also be held at the new facility with the Classic City Track and Field Invitational scheduled for March, making it the first competition on the venue’s calendar, and the GHSA state track meet in May. 

The project, which cost $59.8 million, was funded exclusively by donations and gifts, and will become one of the “premier track and field destinations in the country,” according to the university’s director of athletics Josh Brooks.

“We are excited about the opportunities this facility will create for our athletes, our campus and our community,” Brooks said. “While it will support our student-athletes at the highest level, it will also create opportunities that will bring athletes of all ages to our campus throughout the year.”

The new complex will have a strong emphasis on strengthening ties between the university and local community, as public usage hours will give residents a new place to run and exercise, while big events can boost the local economy through hotel stays and visits to local businesses and restaurants. 

“The Classic City Track and Field Invitational in March will mark the first competition in the new facility, bringing a regional high school meet to campus and expanding access to elite facilities for local student-athletes,” Alison McCullick, the university’s director of community relations, said. “In addition to competitions, the space will remain open for walking, running and everyday recreation, making it a year-round asset for the university and Athens.”



Link

Continue Reading

Sports

Cryst, Pazanti Earn Big West Player Of The Week Honors In Collegiate Debuts

Published

on


LONG BEACH, Calif. — In their collegiate debuts, Jackson Cryst and Jake Pazanti made immediate impacts for Long Beach State men’s volleyball, earning Big West Player of the Week honors following a dominant opening weekend. The Beach opened the 2026 season with two straight-set victories, defeating Lindenwood and McKendree at the Pyramid, as Cryst was named Men’s Volleyball Defensive Player of the Week and Pazanti earned Long Beach State Freshman of the Week recognition.

Cryst anchored the Long Beach State defense in his first collegiate action, averaging 1.50 blocks per set and totaling nine blocks over the weekend. His presence at the net helped limit opponents to a combined .157 hitting percentage and contributed to the Beach averaging 3.33 blocks per set across the two matches. Cryst also added seven kills on .462 hitting, showing efficiency and composure on both sides of the net.

Pazanti also impressed in his collegiate debut, directing the Long Beach State offense with poise and balance. The freshman setter recorded 58 assists (9.67 per set) while guiding the Beach to a .351 team hitting percentage in the opening weekend.

In addition to his setting responsibilities, Pazanti contributed six kills on .750 hitting, 16 digs, five blocks, and two service aces, impacting the match in every phase during his first career starts.

Long Beach State men’s volleyball returns to action this week with a three-game road stretch through the Buckeye State to face Central State, George Mason and Ohio State as the Beach continue early-season competition following a successful opening weekend.



Link

Continue Reading

Sports

Pride Collect Three GNAC Weekly Awards After Wesleyan Winter Invitational

Published

on


WESTON, Mass. — Hannah Griffin, Zoe Kirk, and Justin Thuotte each represented the Pride this week in the Great Northeast Athletic Conference (GNAC) weekly awards. Kirk earned her second Rookie of the Week honor of the season, while Griffin collected her first career Track Athlete of the Week award. Thuotte was named Field Athlete of the Week, marking his first honor of the season and the fifth weekly award of his career.

Zoe Kirk continued her strong rookie campaign with a pair of top-10 finishes. She placed third overall in the high jump with a mark of 1.50 meters, setting a new indoor program record and surpassing the previous mark of 1.46 held by teammate Grace Micklon. Kirk also finished ninth in the 60-meter hurdles, clocking a time of 9.93.

Hannah Griffin captured the top spot in the 800 meters with a time of 2:44.36, edging her nearest competitor by nearly one second.

Justin Thuotte delivered another standout performance at the Wesleyan Winter Invitational, winning the long jump with a mark of 6.70 meters to set a new indoor program record, besting his own previous mark of 6.65 from the last meet. He also placed third in the triple jump at 12.99 meters and rounded out his day with a 10th-place finish in the weight throw, posting a personal-best mark of 13.59 meters.

Regis track and field stays close to home this weekend, traveling to Brighton, Massachusetts, to compete at the Suffolk Ice Breaker at The Track at New Balance.



Link

Continue Reading

Sports

Ella Parker to Join Milwaukee Volleyball as Newest Addition to Roster

Published

on


MILWAUKEE – Ella Parker has been announced as the newest addition to the Milwaukee volleyball roster, head coach Susie Johnson announced on Monday afternoon.
 
Parker will join the Panthers this spring after spending the last three semesters at St. John’s University in Queens, N.Y., where she was a member of the Red Storm for the past two seasons.
 
“We are excited to add Ella to our team this spring,” said Johnson. “Having played in the Big East Conference, she has match experience and will bring a lot to our program in the Horizon League. We’re excited that she not only can score points for us but defend as well.”
 
This past fall, Parker played in 16 matches for St. John’s and recorded 138 kills, along with 10 service aces, 26 digs, and 15 blocks. She posted a season-high 16 kills on Oct. 4 at UConn while hitting .361 and later recorded a season-best .692 hitting percentage with nine kills without an error against LeMoyne earlier in the year.
 
As a true freshman in 2024, Parker saw action in three matches before an injury ended her season.
 
Originally from Corrales, New Mexico, Parker was a three-year member of the Cougar volleyball team at Cibola High School in Albuquerque. During her prep career, she earned AVCA Girls High School All-Region honors as both a junior and a senior and was named to the All-American Watch List.
 
A multiple-time All-State, All-Region, All-Area, and All-Conference selection, Parker was also chosen for the New Mexico Red and Green All-Start Team. She set Cibola program records for both most kills in a season and most kills in a match.
 
Parker played club volleyball for Duke City Volleyball Academy and competed in beach volleyball with the Albuquerque Beach Volleyball Academy. Away from the court, she was also a competitive swimmer for more than 10 years.
 
Parker joins fellow transfer Kameron Stover, along with incoming freshmen Olivia Doerre, Emma Duffy, Kayla Landerud, and Hope Wagner as newcomers for the 2026 volleyball season.
 





Link

Continue Reading

Most Viewed Posts

Trending