NIL
Can Trump save college sports?
Last month, President Donald Trump finally waded into the college sports landscape with yet another executive order. Boldly titled “Saving College Sports,” the order comes after months of signaling his administration was going to fight on one more university battleground. Much like his other executive orders regarding colleges and universities, this one includes some good, some bad, and a lot of confusing open ends. Its highest usefulness, perhaps, is how it encapsulates most of the fault lines and growing pains plaguing college sports’ transition from school-sanctioned “amateurism” to something similar yet fundamentally different as student athletes are finally more fully compensated for their labors.
Back in May, Trump created a presidential commission on college sports, which included former Alabama and LSU head coach Nick Saban and billionaire and Texas Tech booster Cody Campbell. Saban lauded the executive order, having raised many of the complaints included in it over the past several years.
The order follows a landmark settlement in June between the NCAA, the nation’s largest sports conferences, and lawyers representing all Division I athletes that, for the first time, permits schools to pay student-athletes directly. The ruling in Grant House and Sedona Prince v. National Collegiate Athletic Association is the next major break from the old system that began in 2021 with the allowance that college athletes could receive compensation for their name, image, and likeness, colloquially known as NIL deals.

As ESPN’s Dan Murphy explains, since 2021, “college athletes have been allowed to make money from third parties via name, image and likeness deals. Boosters quickly organized groups called collectives that used NIL money as de facto salaries for their teams, in some cases paying millions of dollars mostly to top-rated basketball and football players. Now, that money will come straight from the athletic departments.” The settlement ended three separate federal antitrust lawsuits, which argued, correctly, in my opinion, that the NCAA was illegally limiting the earning power of college athletes. Furthermore, “The NCAA will pay nearly $2.8 billion in back damages over the next 10 years to athletes who competed in college at any time from 2016 through present day. Moving forward, each school can pay its athletes up to a certain limit. The annual cap is expected to start at roughly $20.5 million per school in 2025-26 and increase every year during the decade-long deal. These new payments are in addition to scholarships and other benefits the athletes already receive.”
In addition, the settlement stipulated that beginning July 1, any endorsement deal between athletes and third-party vendors and boosters will be vetted by the recently formed College Sports Commission to determine if it is for a “valid business purpose.” It is into this morass that Trump’s “Saving College Sports” order waded less than a month later.
The order touches on several key areas that are worth going over, not to find clarity — there is none, nor shall there be for the foreseeable future, unfortunately — but to better comprehend the thorniest briars at play in the landscape of college sports and to determine what direction Congress and other executive agencies might go in the future.
In perhaps its most confusing section, the order prohibits “third-party, pay-for-play payments to collegiate athletes.” According to its fact sheet, “This does not apply to legitimate, fair-market-value compensation that a third party provides to an athlete, such as for a brand endorsement.” Crucially, pay-for-play payments are already barred under NCAA rules and have been since the NIL allowances were put in place. For example, a Texas oil billionaire can’t give his alma mater’s star wide receiver $1 million simply because he’s a very good wide receiver who plays for his team. Instead, what we have is what was explained above, endorsement deals by third-party vendors or boosters to pay players for their name, image, or likeness. This hypothetical Texas booster cannot pay for on-the-field performance, but Pete’s Tires And Also Oil could pay that same player for appearances at their store or in their commercials. This is, of course, the same thing with just more steps, and the order offers no clarity or differentiation from the status quo. Indeed, it does not aid in the definition of terms or delineation of what is a legitimate business purpose as required by the College Sports Commission and the House v. NCAA settlement. This is one of the major litigation and regulation hurdles for college sports, determining where these lines are.

As the great Andy Staples points out, this commission enforcement arm has already had to retract some of its rulings dictating which third-party payment businesses were considered legitimate. It originally barred businesses charging for the opportunity to meet players, but it was forced to revoke that stricture once players’ lawyers argued that it is, quite obviously, a legitimate business model in any other context, such as the service Cameo or any number of celebrity meet-and-greet models.
There remains a further lack of clarity, as well, whether these collectives are viewed as an arm of the schools or if they stand alone as third-party actors or somewhere in between. This is particularly important as it pertains to the $20.5 million revenue-share cap imposed by the House ruling: If collectives are beneath the school umbrella, what amount are they permitted to funnel to specific sports, and through what method? If they remain outside, then any direct-to-athlete or direct-to-recruit endorsement payments continue to elide that cap, as is the case now, with countless headline-grabbing million-dollar payouts to star transfers.
Speaking of million-dollar payouts to star players, the order also includes the frankly baffling concept of monitoring a “fair-market value” for these payments. Firstly, what is fair-market value? Excepting bumbling governmental intervention, fair-market value is simply what people will pay. As Jake Crain of the Crain & Company show put it, this idea is “frankly un-American.” Furthermore, the idea of the College Sports Commission being tasked with this adjudication is laughable. The notion that, whether by algorithm or convention, they must determine every single payment over $600 to a student athlete to ensure it is not only for “a valid business purpose” but that it also meets some nebulous concept of “fair-market value.” Are deals weighted by geography and regional capital? Are positions — quarterback, running back, shooting guard, libero, coxswain — all weighted differently in compensation allowances? What about brand name, conference pedigree, or team quality? Arch Manning, Texas’s star quarterback of Manning family fame, undoubtedly has a higher Q Score than Taylen Green, my quarterback at the University of Arkansas. Manning has also won fewer games than Green, but he plays on a better team. One is reportedly receiving more than $6 million in NIL deals, the other only around $2 million. Is this difference representative of the fair-market value range? Is it “fair” that one receives three times the other while both receive 10-15 times more than offensive linemen on their teams? Who knows? Definitely not the government, I can tell you that, and probably not the College Sports Commission either.
On one of the thorniest issues for college sports, the executive order punts. And wisely so, I might add. “The Order directs the Secretary of Labor and the National Labor Relations Board to clarify the status of student-athletes in order to preserve non-revenue sports and the irreplaceable educational and developmental opportunities that college sports provide.” This direction is regarding whether student athletes should be legally, financially, and contractually considered as employees, contractors, the vaguely defined “amateurs,” or some fourth thing somewhere in between.

Calling student athletes “amateurs” was the NCAA’s decadeslong dead horse it’d lovingly trot out to beat any time it would receive correct pushback about not paying players any portion of the billions of dollars its collective efforts garnered every year. It still holds sway among many fans and lawmakers, and it is fairly clear — if not from the order, then from Trump, Saban, and the brain trust around his college sports policy team — this part of the order wishes the NLRB to define athletes’ status closer to the amateur designation than employee one. Nevertheless, not attempting to unilaterally define what is one of the crux issues at play in how and how much athletes are compensated is a wise decision from Trump and his team, as whatever answer we arrive at eventually will be one undoubtedly won in a courtroom.
The order also notes, but does not address in any detail, several additional considerations that often are overlooked in conversations about college football and basketball NIL deals and television rights. These include “the preservation and, where possible, expansion of opportunities for scholarships and collegiate athletic competition in women’s and non-revenue sports” and a directive to the “Assistant to the President for Domestic Policy and the Director of the White House Office of Public Liaison to consult with the U.S. Olympic and Paralympic Teams and other organizations to protect the role of college athletics in developing world-class American athletes.” There is a real fear, and potential, unfortunately, that the increased domination of the two major college sports and the coalescing of all major Division I schools into “super conferences” will crowd out the funding, considerations, and attention of other sports such as track, hockey, gymnastics, swimming, volleyball, and so on. This also relates to the development of U.S. Olympic athletes, the vast majority of whom participate in collegiate athletics.
While offering, quite bluntly, very little new to the conversation, the executive order at least makes clear the Trump administration’s priorities — largely aimed at preserving what remains of the old college sports status quo while providing regulated allowances to paying student athletes. As I have made clear, I have both functional and intellectual qualms with the design of some of these priorities.
But I want to acknowledge that I do agree with the purpose of them. Trump, Saban, and company are correct that the current system is untenable and could rupture into something unrecognizable from the college sports landscape that we all grew up with and fans such as myself have loved, pain and all, for as long as I can remember. Paying players is right and good, and much of this will, when the dust settles, shake out into something I expect to be far better than the worst-case scenario. But that reality does require some messy policy making and court battles: managerial due diligence that the NCAA and its feckless nanny-staters and hangers-on simply ran away from when they opened the doors to the wild west back in 2021 without a plan. Indeed, it’s quite clear their plan was Pontius Pilate’s: wash their hands of the whole enterprise and leave it to the government.
TRUMP SHOULD BREAK THE COLLEGE PIPELINE
As Trump’s order notes, there are 30 different state-level NIL laws and countless lawsuits working their way through various courts. Things are, in a word, messy, and will remain so for the time being until a more cohesive way forward is made. Congress is trying its hand with various salves, the most prominent college sports bill being the bipartisan SCORE Act. Sadly, it’s not a very good bill and is likely to face heavy resistance in the Senate — it is already being opposed by several states’ attorneys general, led by Tennessee’s Jonathan Skrmetti.
That’s not to say the sky is falling, though. The tumult of NIL and conference realignment will continue for some time before settling, but the sports themselves will stay at least as long as the television deals and generational rivalries do. Once we get some decent reins on this thing, it’ll run just fine.
NIL
Urban Meyer Enshrined into the College Football Hall of Fame
COLUMBUS, Ohio – The Bellagio Resort & Casino played host to an all-star cast of history’s greatest football legends and the sport’s most promising student-athletes during Tuesday night’s 67th National Football Foundation (NFF) Annual Awards Dinner Presented by Las Vegas.
More than 1,800 people attended, and countless more watched on ESPN+ as the star-studded 2025 NFF College Football Hall of Fame Class received college football’s ultimate honor. The NFF also honored 16 of the game’s top student-athletes, who collected postgraduate scholarships as members of the 2025 NFF National Scholar-Athlete Class Presented by Fidelity Investments. More than 50 previous NFF Hall of Fame inductees returned, and 125 colleges and universities sent representatives to attend the fabled affair.
Urban Meyer, the third-winningest coach in Division I history who led Ohio State to a national championship, three Big Ten Conference titles and seven wins over Michigan during a seven-year tenure as head coach, was among the class of 22 inductees: 18 first-team All-America players and four standout coaches.
Meyer coached the final game of a coaching career that places him alongside legends on Jan. 1, 2019 at the Rose Bowl in Pasadena, Calif. His Buckeyes defeated Pac 12 champion Washington, 28-23, to cap a 13-1 campaign.
Meyer’s Ohio State Buckeyes were, for seven seasons, on top of the college football world. The team won the inaugural College Football Playoff national championship in 2014 and won Big Ten Conference titles in 2014, 2017 and 2018. His teams never finished worse than first in the Big Ten’s divisional standings, and his Buckeyes were dominant in Big Ten games with a best-ever 7-0 record vs. Michigan and a 54-4 overall record in Big Ten games, including an NCAA record 30 consecutive conference victories.
His Buckeye teams were 83-9 overall, including the sixth unbeaten/untied season in school history in 2012 (12-0), a record-tying 14 wins in 2014 and the two longest win streaks in school history: 24 and 23 games.
Meyer’s 17 seasons as a head coach featured a record of 187-32 that positions him with the third-highest winning percentage in college football history at .853, trailing only Hall of Fame coaches Knute Rockne and Frank Leahy.
Off the field, Meyer’s development of players included “Real Life Wednesdays,” a series of speakers – CEOs, money managers, pro athletes, etc. – who addressed the team in life experiences and pursuits to ensure they were prepared for life after football.
Beyond football, Meyer has made a lasting impact through civic service, serving on the boards of the Veterans Golfers Association, Folds of Honor, and the Tim Tebow Foundation. He and his wife established the Urban and Shelley Meyer Fund for Cancer Research at Ohio State’s Comprehensive Cancer Center.
Meyer earned a bachelor’s degree in psychology from the University of Cincinnati (1986), lettering one season (1984) with the Bearcats as a defensive back. While launching his coaching career as a graduate assistant with the Buckeyes, he earned his master’s degree in sports administration from Ohio State in 1988. Meyer’s coaching career also includes assistant positions at Illinois State, Colorado State and Notre Dame. He was the head coach of the Jacksonville Jaguars in 2021.
He is a member of the Utah Athletics Crimson Club Hall of Fame, the Greater Cleveland Sports Hall of Fame, and the Ashtabula County Football Hall of Fame. He currently serves as a host and analyst on FOX’s Big Noon Kickoff.
Ohio State Head Coaches in the College Football Hall of Fame (8)
Name – Years at Ohio State Inducted
Urban Meyer – 2012-18 2025
Jim Tressel – 2001-10 2015
John Cooper – 1988-2000 2008
Earle Bruce – 1979-87 2002
Woody Hayes – 1951-78 1983
Francis Schmidt – 1934-40 1971
John Wilce – 1913-28 1954
Howard Jones – 1910 1951
NIL
Major college football program reveals talks with SEC amid expansion speculation
Notre Dame has seen its College Football Playoff hopes dismantled, has declined its bowl game, and watched its relationship with the ACC deteriorate, all in the last few days.
And now, the man in charge of Notre Dame athletics has revealed he had a conversation with the commissioner of the SEC.
“The only commissioner I’ve spoken to, and I’ve had a couple of great conversations with him, is Greg Sankey,” Bevacqua said of the SEC commissioner.
He added: “Greg and I talk all the time. I can’t tell you how much I admire Greg and his leadership.”
What Notre Dame is interested in
Before you start thinking that Notre Dame is about to join a conference, think again.
Bevacqua said his conversation with Sankey had nothing to do with the Irish finally forsaking its independence, but about the structure and format of the College Football Playoff in the years to come.
Being left out of the playoff tends to inspire teams to re-think what the playoff should look like.
“Gave him my viewpoint on the process. He shared some thoughts that he had with me that, obviously, are between Greg and me,” Bevacqua said.
“Format? Greg knows. They all know how I feel about the format. Put the process aside. The format, being, you know, four teams, twelve teams, fourteen teams, sixteen teams, a thousand teams?”
What should the playoff look like
Okay, maybe not a thousand. How about sixteen? That seems to be the new sweet spot from Notre Dame’s perspective. And it could be for others, too.
“It should be sixteen teams, in my opinion, with five automatic qualifiers and eleven at-larges,” he said.
“Think about this year. If we had four teams, it would have been perfect. I don’t think anybody would argue that those aren’t the right four teams that are one through four, right, the way they’re playing. Texas Tech, Ohio State, Indiana, and Georgia… Sixteen would have been perfect. Notre Dame, Texas, Vanderbilt, you know, who else is in there.”
Expansion would cover all the problems
Bevacqua said that the particular metrics the playoff selectors use will necessarily change as each season brings its own unique situations.
The answer to compensating for those year-by-year situations is to simply expand the format and allow for more teams to have a chance.
“You know, year by year, you’re never going to have the same data points each year. It’s never going to work out perfectly, whether you have four teams, twelve, fourteen, or sixteen,” he said.
“What I like about sixteen is it does create more opportunity, it does create more narratives around more schools and yet preserves the integrity and importance of the regular season, and I think that’s one of the greatest things college football has going for it.”
What about the regular season?
Notre Dame’s head man doesn’t think expanding the playoff will have a negative impact on the regular season.
“The regular season is more important in college football than it is in any other sport by a mile…College football? I mean, hey we see it,” he said.
“We saw it last year. We saw it this year. We knew last year, when we lost to NIU? We had no wiggle room. Every game was a bowl game. Every game was a CFP game. This year, after we lost in the last second to A&M? Zero room for error.
“Turns out, we didn’t even have zero room for error. But, I think sixteen teams, with that five and eleven breakdown, is the way to go. And I think a vast, vast majority of people in the CFP management room feel the same way.”
Read more from College Football HQ
NIL
Navy’s Brian Newberry can still build his program from the ground up
A month after Brian Newberry arrived at the Naval Academy in 2019 to begin his tenure as defensive coordinator, his wife, Kate, gave birth to their first child. A second one followed. The Newberry family has grown in Annapolis, and Newberry’s career has grown with it.
Newberry, in his third year at the helm of Navy, is on the verge of becoming the first coach to lead the Midshipmen to consecutive 10-win seasons in their history.
“That says it all in terms of his leadership and the culture he’s developed,” Navy athletic director Michael Kelly said.
Newberry and Kelly emphasized that the eyes of America will be on the players on the field for the 126th Army-Navy game Saturday at M&T Bank Stadium. But there may be a few athletic departments looking toward the sideline at the 51-year-old head coach who has orchestrated Navy’s return to prominence.
Not that Newberry plans to go anywhere.
Annapolis, Newberry said, feels like home, even though it’s far from his native Oklahoma. And, given the shifting nature of the sport, the sure-footedness offered at Navy — a program intent on developing leaders internally, without the free-for-all transfers that have gripped other schools — makes it an ideal spot for Newberry.
Where else would he rather be?
“It’s a special place and it’s one of the best jobs in the country, because of the kind of young men we have, because it still is, truly, a developmental program,” Newberry said. “Annapolis is a great place to live. You feel like you’re somewhere important. And you get into coaching to make an impact and a difference.
“Understanding that you’re impacting young men who are going to be officers and go serve our country, that gives you a little more meaning and responsibility as a coach. It really is important to me.”
There are few places that can offer Newberry such an existence.
As change buffets college football, Army, Air Force and Navy stand in the eye of the storm, untouched by the gales of the new world. There are no name, image and likeness sponsorships for service academy athletes.
While many programs rely on the transfer portal to inject talent into the roster — adding as many “free agents” as they lose each offseason — Navy builds from the ground up.
“We’re unicorns in college football today,” Newberry said.
Added Army coach Jeff Monken: “We just are who we are. Nothing’s really changed for us. It’s business as usual.”
This is part of the allure for Newberry at Navy. He has coached across the college football landscape, from Division III Washington & Lee to Division I minnow Kennesaw State. Now he leads Navy, a position he has held since Ken Niumatalolo was fired at the end of the 2022 season, and there’s no reason in his mind to move.
Newberry has friends at Power 4 schools. They have the supposed benefits of large NIL coffers and the transfer portal. And yet “there’s a great sense of frustration that has come” at those programs for coaches, Newberry said.
“It should be transformational, right? It’s become a lot more transactional at that level,” Newberry said. “We don’t have that at the Naval Academy.”
The players aren’t the only ones to participate in the merry-go-round of college football, of course. They’re just the newest to benefit from it. Coaches have jumped between programs for decades, going back to when advertising the size of a weight room was the primary recruiting tool for players rather than which school had the most money to offer. The coaching sagas are ongoing, as seen by LSU’s high-stakes pursuit of Lane Kiffin.
Newberry says he is not eying such a move, even though his considerable success at Navy could draw suitors and a significant raise; according to USA Today he made $1.8 million last season, ranking in the middle of the American Athletic Conference but lower than any Power 4 coach.
“I’ve never been a guy who chases jobs, necessarily,” Newberry said. “I’ve always tried to be where my feet are and make the best of a situation and enjoy the people I work with and enjoy the young men I get to coach and build relationships and all those things. That’s what’s important to me. And I’ve been beyond fortunate to be at the Naval Academy.”
Newberry’s first year, replacing the winningest coach in program history in Niumatalolo, was middling. The Midshipmen finished 2023 with a 5-7 record, their fourth straight losing season. That, some came to expect, was as good as things would be in the new world order following the NCAA’s 2021 decision to change its rules to allow athletes to make NIL money.
With it came questions regarding how the service academies might keep up.
The answer: Newberry led Navy to a 10-2 record in 2024, capped by a win over Oklahoma in the Armed Forces Bowl. Entering the Army-Navy game, Navy holds a 9-2 mark. Army has prospered, as well; the Black Knights posted a 12-2 record last year and are 6-5 in 2025.
Kelly believes Army and Navy are thriving because they are outliers.
“But for us it’s not so much the benefit aspect of it; it’s the player stability and lack of player movement, the fact we can be a true player development program, build year to year to year, and build that sort of team unity,” he said. “I can’t believe it’s coincidence that both Navy and West Point have had such great success these last few years.”
Blake Horvath, who has established himself as one of the greatest quarterbacks in Navy history, knows the recruiting rankings won’t flash high grades for players who sign with the service academies. The difference, however, is the longevity — the culture built with players who are there for the long haul.
“I think the biggest thing is, when this was all coming around, the first few years it was like, ‘Oh, it’s passed the academies by. The academies will never be good again because of this,’” Horvath said. “And I think we’ve all proven that wrong, just because, if anything, it makes us stronger. We develop, we have better bonds, we know each other better, we have a culture that is continuous and doesn’t get lost in different transfer portals and other things.”
Newberry thinks, in a sense, the transfer portal is helping Navy’s recruiting. There are schools that seek out the experience of transfer players to maintain a high level of performance, but that focus limits opportunities for high school players on the fringes of big-time college consideration.
“What that’s allowed us to do is recruit a little higher-caliber player than we have in the past,” Newberry said. “We can be a little bit more selective. It’s still difficult to recruit at the Naval Academy. We’re still competing against Army and Air Force for the majority of our recruits. I think that pull is stronger now than it ever has been, and we’re starting to look a little different.”
A few years ago, becoming the head coach of a program was far from Newberry’s mind. He enjoyed calling defensive plays at Navy, and as he watched all that was required of Niumatalolo, he wondered if he even wanted the added responsibility.
He had two young kids; did he really want 100 more under his direct purview?
“I didn’t know if I wanted the responsibility of it all,” Newberry said. “If I could manage juggling a family with being a head coach and all that entails, and work-life balance.”
But watching Niumatalolo and Brian Bohannon before him at Kennesaw State showed Newberry he could have that and “still do things the right way.”
And he feels that Navy, too, does things the right way.
“This institution really speaks for itself in a lot of ways,” Horvath said. “And I think he’s in the perfect place for him and what he tries to do for our team. And the bigger thing is building a staff that really preaches a program that he wants to build, it’s the same thing. So I think what he’s been able to do and what we’ve been able to do for our program is immeasurable.”
Except, perhaps, it’s measured most heavily on one game per year. The eyes of the country will be on Army and Navy. And they’ll be on a head coach who “never in my wildest dreams” thought he’d be here.
NIL
Diego Pavia promises to donate all his NIL money to a G5 team if it wins the national championship
Vanderbilt quarterback Diego Pavia has never lacked confidence or conviction. He proved it again this week with one of the boldest statements of the college football season.
Appearing on The Pivot Podcast, Pavia argued that the College Football Playoff should truly consist of the 12 best teams in America. He doesn’t believe this year’s Group of Five participants, Tulane and James Madison, have any real shot at winning it all. Then, he took it a step further.
SUBSCRIBE to the On3 NIL and Sports Business Newsletter
“It’s a 12-team Playoff. Put every team that’s good,” Pavia said. “If a G5 team wins it, I would donate whatever I got in NIL back to that team. I would do that, if a G5 team ever wins it.”
Alas, Pavia’s frustration is rooted in Vanderbilt’s narrow miss of the postseason despite a historic 10–2 season. The Commodores finished at No. 13, falling outside the field of 12 and behind programs like Notre Dame, BYU and Texas.
The irony is that those teams would’ve kept Vanderbilt out, even automatic bids did not exist. Still, for a program that just delivered its first-ever 10-win regular season, being left out stings. And Pavia, one of the nation’s most electric players, has not been shy about voicing that disappointment.
His appearance on The Pivot was part of a whirlwind week as the elder quarterback continues his media tour ahead of Saturday’s Heisman Trophy ceremony. Pavia was named one of four 2025 finalists, joining Indiana’s Fernando Mendoza, Ohio State’s Julian Sayin and Notre Dame running back Jeremiyah Love in New York City.
No national title, but can Diego Pavia win the Heisman?
During the interview, Pavia also opened up about what the Heisman moment means to him. It’s something he has dreamed about since childhood.
“I still remember Johnny winning it,” he said, recalling Johnny Manziel’s iconic Heisman victory. “I used to watch Johnny’s tape. … I want that to be me one day. Now, it’s coming full circle.”
All told, Pavia’s rise has been nothing short of remarkable. He led the SEC in total offense with 4,018 yards and accounted for 36 touchdowns while carrying Vanderbilt to the brink of the Playoff.
He also became just the fourth SEC player in the last 30 years to top 250 passing yards and 150 rushing yards in a single game. That put him in a group headlined by Manziel, Jayden Daniels and Tim Tebow.
Whether Pavia wins the Heisman or not, he has already cemented his place as one of the most compelling characters in college football. He’s fiery, fearless and unapologetically competitive, and now he’s willing to put his NIL on the line to prove a point.
— On3’s Alex Byington contributed to this article.
NIL
Insight into Matt Campbell’s transfer portal, NIL experience entering Penn State
The Penn State coaching search didn’t go exactly as planned, but the Nittany Lions ultimately landed a potential strong hire in 46-year-old Matt Campbell, luring him away from Iowa State.
Campbell delivered Iowa State’s most successful stretch in program history over the last decade, winning seven games in eight of his 10 seasons in Ames, Iowa, including four of the Cyclones’ 12 eight-win seasons all-time and their first 10-win campaign, an 11-3 finish in 2024.
Still, questions linger about whether Campbell can compete with Big Ten elites like Ohio State, Michigan, Oregon and Indiana on the recruiting trail.
Iowa State posted high school finishes of Nos. 55, 55, 42, 39, and 59 over the last five cycles. It signed just one top 75 transfer class during his tenure (No. 59 in 2025).
CBS Sports‘ College Football Insiders weigh in on whether Campbell can elevate his game with Penn State’s resources, or if the Nittany Lions should brace for more tough sledding against the Big Ten’s best.
“Not long after the Penn State job opened, we talked to someone close to Matt about whether he’d be a fit,” said John Talty on Tuesday’s episode. “That person mentioned him not really having to mess with NIL and the transfer portal that much at Iowa State.
NIL
WVU’s Slaton Officially Inducted Into The College Football Hall of Fame
Last night, Slaton and 15 others were inducted into the College Football Hall of Fame during the 67th National Football Foundation (NFF) Annual Awards Dinner at the Bellagio Resort & Casino in Las Vegas.
According to the NFF release, more than 1,800 people were in attendance and the event was also streamed on ESPN+.
Slaton broke onto the scene during his freshman year in 2005 when he went from fourth on the team’s depth chart to scoring a school-record six touchdowns in West Virginia’s five-overtime 46-44 victory over Louisville and later setting a Sugar Bowl rushing record with 204 yards in the Mountaineers’ stunning 38-35 victory over Georgia.
He was named the game’s offensive MVP.
Slaton’s record lasted nine years before being topped by Ohio State’s Ezekiel Elliott in 2015 against Alabama when he ran for 230 yards.
His best season at West Virginia came in 2006 when he rushed for a career-high 1,744 yards with 16 touchdowns, while also catching 27 passes for 360 yards and two scores to earn unanimous consensus All-America honors. He was second in the nation in all-purpose yardage, fourth in rushing yards per game and tied for 12th in scoring.
His best single-game performance was his 215 yards rushing and 130 yards receiving in the Mountaineers’ 45-27 victory over Pitt in 2006.
Slaton’s junior year in 2007 saw him eclipse 100 yards in a game six times and finish with another 1,000-yard rushing season, his third at WVU.
In 36 career games, the Levittown, Pennsylvania, resident rushed for 3,923 yards and a school-best 50 touchdowns. His rushing yardage total ranks fifth in school history despite skipping his senior year to enter the NFL Draft.
“When the dust settles, all of the hard work you put in will show off,” Slaton said during Tuesday afternoon’s press conference. “Everybody from that 2005 season on the team and the people of the state, they surround you and help make you become a better player for them.”
West Virginia won the 2006 Sugar, 2007 Gator and 2008 Fiesta Bowls and produced an impressive 33-5 record during Slaton’s three seasons in Morgantown.
“I’m most proud that all of the guys are still friends,” he said. “We’re still a family and I think that’s why football is one of the best team sports that you can play. I’m proud that the guys I grinded with have remained great men, great human beings and great fathers. I appreciate that.”
Slaton played five NFL seasons with the Houston Texas and Miami Dolphins, rushing for 1,282 yards and scoring nine touchdowns during his rookie season in 2008, but a severe nerve injury affecting his right arm and causing numbness curtailed his professional career.
Today, he lives in Houston, Texas, with his wife Kimberly and their two sons.
Slaton now becomes the 14th player with West Virginia University ties inducted into the College Football Hall of Fame. Linebacker Darryl Talley was the most recent inductee in 2011.
Among those in Las Vegas representing West Virginia University in support of Slaton were coach Rich Rodriguez, athletics director Wren Baker and president Michael T. Benson.
-
Rec Sports2 weeks agoFirst Tee Winter Registration is open
-
Rec Sports2 weeks agoFargo girl, 13, dies after collapsing during school basketball game – Grand Forks Herald
-
Motorsports2 weeks agoCPG Brands Like Allegra Are Betting on F1 for the First Time
-
Motorsports2 weeks agoF1 Las Vegas: Verstappen win, Norris and Piastri DQ tighten 2025 title fight
-
Sports2 weeks agoTwo Pro Volleyball Leagues Serve Up Plans for Minnesota Teams
-
Sports2 weeks agoSycamores unveil 2026 track and field schedule
-
Sports2 weeks agoUtah State Announces 2025-26 Indoor Track & Field Schedule
-
Motorsports2 weeks agoRedemption Means First Pro Stock World Championship for Dallas Glenn
-
Sports2 weeks agoTexas volleyball vs Kentucky game score: Live SEC tournament updates
-
NIL1 week agoBowl Projections: ESPN predicts 12-team College Football Playoff bracket, full bowl slate after Week 14





