Connect with us
https://yoursportsnation.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/call-to-1.png

NIL

Strategy over transparency, says AD Anne McCoy

Published

on


WHEN IT COMES to revenue sharing and NIL dollars, Washington State isn’t playing the disclosure game. Athletic director Anne McCoy tells Cougfan.com in a wide-ranging interview the Cougars are purposefully keeping their numbers under wraps — a strategic decision designed to protect competitive advantage while zeroing in on what’s best for WSU in the evolving college football landscape.

If you missed the first article from CF.C’s talk with McCoy, CLICK HERE. Here’s her insight on NIL, revenue sharing and more …

COUGFANcom: How much NIL money do your coaches say that they need to be able to compete consistently each year?

McCoy: I think that’s still something we’re wrapping our arms around. And honestly, from a competitive perspective, not something we’re really talking very publicly about. We’ve leaned in on scholarships, we’ve leaned in on the cost of attendance — whatever the coaches think is important, whether it’s retention or recruitment from the NIL perspective. So we have purposefully worked with our coaches closely behind the scenes.

But from a competitive advantage or disadvantage, that really isn’t something we’re talking about very publicly.

COUGFANcom: In terms of revenue sharing, how much revenue will Washington State be sharing with its athletes this school year?

McCoy: I think that falls into that same boat. Again, from a competitive advantage or disadvantage, it’s not a number that we’re putting out there publicly.

COUGFANcom: Can you talk about how Washington State’s revenue sharing compares with our brethren in the new Pac-12?

McCoy: I think they’re in the same boat we’re in in a lot of cases, that people aren’t really talking about this very transparently. So we’re more focused on what we need to do at Washington State to continue to be competitive and to really be leaders in the new Pac-12 with what’s right for us.

COUGFANcom: What’s the status of the Washington State’s athletic department fundraising compared to this point last year?

McCoy: We’re trending in a really good direction. If memory serves me right, I think of our quarters this past year were higher than they’ve ever been in history. It’s always an interesting moving target because whether you have, capital project fundraising or bigger ticket things that are maybe a single focus vs. just general fundraising. But we feel really good about it.

Our donor engagement has been higher than ever. I think we are something like six tickets shy of 1,000 new season ticket holders, so that’s trending in a good direction, and many of those are in donor seating areas. We’re really focusing right now on not only our athletic scholarships, which obviously are always a priority, but really looking at fundraising specifically for additional fan enhancements that we hope to put in place next fall if we’re looking at the scoreboard, new turf, ribbon board, sound — a lot of other things we know need to happen, but we need a longer runway for not only from a competitive bid process but also, quite frankly, a funding aspect.

We feel really good about it. I think it’s been hard after people were a little uncertain of some of the directions things had been going. The fact that we’re entering this year with a full Pac-12 going forward, with the expanded media and just the excitement, enthusiasm on campus., think that it really is translating to folks not only continuing to invest, but maybe increasing that investment, and new people also coming to the table.

The increased membership to the Cougar Athletic Fund from the recent push, all of those things are really trending in a positive direction and are really exciting, honestly.

COUGFANcom: How is the fundraising for the Next Chapter program come together so far?

McCoy: It’s been really good. One piece of that, and it’s meant to be, is if you love NIL or scholarships, there’s an option. If you really are passionate about facilities, that’s an option. But one of the things we’ve put into place new as part of the Next Chapter is also these opportunities to invest more directly in the program that makes your heart sing, whether it be women’s basketball or football or swimming or whatever program.

It’s a new opportunity for people that want to invest in a specific program to really have increased access and exposure to our head coaches and our teams. We have some people that have wanted to join every single one because they want to be invested or involved and some that are picking, the sports that are nearest and dearest to their hearts.

COUGFANcom: We’ve heard that some of the savings from track will be used for scholarships and volleyball and other sports. Is that accurate?

McCoy: Yes, absolutely. I think as we talked about at the time, the track decision was not about an overall budget reduction for the department. It was about finding a way that we could not be spread as thin as we were becoming. And so absolutely the scholarships, particularly on the women’s side from track, will be reinvested in other women’s sports programs and we’re also really looking at ways that we can bolster the services that we’re providing all of our student athletes going forward. So yes, that is absolutely accurate.

COUGFANcom: What are some of the details? How many scholarships are we talking about and how does it break down across sports?

McCoy: I would not say it’s been a specific ‘this dollar to this place, this dollar to that place.’ I mean, we’re looking at our budget overall as a whole. And so we certainly have some staff savings that we’re able to reinvest from the track changes. We have money that we’re reinvesting in the track and cross country programs. And so I don’t know that I could give you a very succinct answer on tracking every dollar and where it’s going.

And so whether that’s a decreased load on our athletic medicine staff or nutrition or academic support services or whatever it might be, I think it’s a much larger picture. But I do know we’ve been extremely careful relative to any of the changes in our women’s scholarships to track to make sure those were reinvesting now we do have some track athletes still here that are finishing up their degrees or perhaps waiting to transfer at the semester or after the year.

COUGFANcom: Your reaction to the just-announced deal with The CW, the second TV deal announced so far with CBS the first?

The CW has been a great partner last year and coming up for this year and I think as all of the interest with the Pac-12 media rights going forward it’s really gained a lot of momentum. We’re excited for the opportunity to not only continue, but expand the partnership with The CW. They have such a broad reach, literally 100 percent of the households throughout the U.S.

It’s not only a chance for football in the Pac-12 to continue to be seen, but really the expansion into men’s and women’s basketball for that same level of exposure. They’ve been tremendous partners and I think really are excited about the vision of the Pac-12 and want to be a big part of that moving forward.

COUGFANcom: There obviously there’s still a lot of game inventory out there available for broadcast. When do you anticipate additional media rights partnerships being announced? Is that something fans should expect, say, in the next couple weeks, or is it something that’s still going to take a while?

McCoy:  I don’t know that I have a good answer for that right now. The Pac-12 has been very deliberate with not only the membership but also Octagon, their media consultants, and I think just determining when each piece is ready to be not only signed off on, but then announced. We are really encouraged by all the interest, but I just think the Pac-12 has purposefully avoided a timeline only because then it becomes; ‘Why wasn’t it announced yet?’ And then people wonder if there’s more to the story.

And so they’ve been really thorough and, I think, deliberate about it. So I don’t know, I honestly don’t. I mean, it could be next week. It could be in three weeks. When the Pac-12 is ready, it’ll come out.

COUGFANcom: Turner Sports, TNT and TBS, ESPN — anybody else that we should be keeping an eye out for on potential TV partners?

McCoy: I think what I would say is that Octagon and the Pac-12 are leaving no stone left unturned of folks that might be interested in being partners, and whether it be streaming, whether it be traditional over the air broadcasts or whatever. So I would say if there’s any partner you could potentially envision, I think that they’re being vetted and looked at. But obviously it’s a competitive bid process. So beyond that, I probably wouldn’t say much more about it.

COUGFANcom: The press release last week said the large pregame tailgate area was moving to the CUB Senior Ballroom and the Fieldhouse was going to be used for corporate events. On first glance it seems like it should be exactly the opposite given the atmosphere in the Fieldhouse, no? Walk us through the thinking on that.

McCoy: I think it’s like a tale of two fieldhouses is how I would best describe it. If you came to events a decade or more ago, what the Fieldhouse was then vs. what it really has evolved into the last several years, I think are two very different things. And I think that the affinity people have for the Fieldhouse, which I completely understand and agree with, the facility unfortunately is in need of some maintenance. It needs some upgrades.

We’ve gotten a lot of complaints, quite frankly, from people who are choosing not to go to the Fieldhouse anymore: the audio/visual quality is tough, the lighting is tough. We aren’t able to do some of the things that we used to be able to do relative to food vendors and a variety of different things. And it just has withered a bit, quite frankly.

We took a lot of time in the off season to really think about it and thought, OK, well, we’re not doing a multi-million dollar upgrade to the facility right now. And we have a women’s tennis team that needs to be able to practice and compete in that facility and really looking at how even just the footprint has changed. You need a ticket to go into Cougville on Rogers Field, but we still want a place that people can go ideally where they don’t need a ticket. And we used to do things pregame, either through campus or athletics up in the CUB but that had kind of ceased over the last few years. And so as we looked at how can we provide a better environment that’s still resistant to the weather relative to an indoor space, a place where we can have large screen TVs for people to watch games and they can actually hear that and see it, and we can have yard games for the kids.

We can have beer, wine, cocktails and food options and really bringing some energy to that central part of campus. From a decade ago, that is not the same Fieldhouse, it’s not the same environment. And so we think the CUB has a chance to be potentially an even better space. And then the Fieldhouse right now would be available for private corporate events, (or) an opposing team alumni association or something that’s smaller and more contained. But really, honestly, we’re trying to bring in more energy, and listening to the fans about needing something that really was an improvement over where the Fieldhouse had evolved to.

COUGFANcom: In terms of  potential expansion and new Pac-12 member schools, anything on the horizon soon for either a school coming in for all sports, and/or football, basketball and or baseball only?

McCoy: Much like the media, the Pac-12 continues to explore all options and evaluate what’s best for the conference going forward. I think that they’re also looking at continuing some expansion and maybe some affiliate members or other things that really can make the conference the strongest going forward. I don’t sit here knowing that there’s going to be an imminent announcement. But having said that, in college athletics these days, you know, things are the way they are until they’re not. But there’s no immediate, you know, either full -fledged or other announcements on the horizon that I’m aware of.

COUGFANcom: How engaged has President Elizabeth Cantwell been in athletics in her short time here?

McCoy: It’s been great. Having come from Utah State, a school that just made the decision to move to the Pac-12, I think she’s very aware of how an athletic department can help in spreading the vision and the mission for a university. So we had a chance to have her at a couple of our all-student athlete meetings recently to start the semester. She’s been involved coming to some practices, certainly competitions, but I think also just learning as much as she can, not only about our program and our budget, but much like she is doing for the entire system.

I feel like she’s done a great job of really understanding us as a department, but as part of the bigger mission of the university and so it’s been it’s been really good.

COUGFANcom: Any final thoughts? The floor is yours.

McCoy: It’s been hard with all the changes in college athletics and we understand that and the one thing I would say is is that there are a lot of really exciting things happening, and our student athletes and our coaches are working really hard. We all understand and feel the frustration with some of the changes in a variety of different areas, but we need to go forward and we need to look towards the future and do what we can to best position Washington State University. And I think just having that level of, you know, support for everything the other sports are doing or the coaches or the student athletes, and just realizing that, you know, it’s okay to be frustrated about some of the changes, but it’s also okay to be excited and ready to kind of move into the future.

And you know, any yoga fans out there, you have a chance for a couple home football games to do yoga on the field. I mean, just looking at how we can make the game day experience a more expanded, inclusive experience for all Coug fans, I think some things will be a hit and some will maybe take some time. But at the end of the day, understand that there are a lot of great things going on and we want to continue to partner with people and be good stewards of the department.

Related: McCoy says ‘We’re crossing every T, dotting every I’ on expanded beer and wine sales



Link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

NIL

Former 5-star QB sparks transfer portal battle between two college football programs

Published

on


The college football offseason received a massive jolt of energy regarding a high-profile quarterback decision. A highly touted former five-star recruit officially placed his name into the transfer portal this week to spark an immediate recruiting battle. This move creates a significant shift in the landscape for several top-tier programs looking to upgrade their roster talent immediately.

He spent his freshman campaign serving as a backup for a prominent West Coast power before opting to explore other options. The decision comes after the incumbent starter announced plans to return for another season in Los Angeles. This talented passer possesses four years of eligibility and offers immediate upside for teams in need of a dynamic playmaker to lead their offense.

Elite programs are already lining up to secure his services for the upcoming campaign. Two major conference rivals have quickly emerged as the primary contenders for his commitment.

One suitor aims to get the prospect on campus immediately, while the other navigates its own complex quarterback room situation involving potential NFL departures.

Lane Kiffin and LSU battle Oregon for Husan Longstreet

Former USC quarterback Husan Longstreet is the player at the center of this developing saga. The Corona, California, native entered the portal Thursday after playing behind Jayden Maiava during his freshman season.

Maiava intends to return to the Trojans next year, which prompted the move. Longstreet finished his brief USC tenure with 103 passing yards and one touchdown across four appearances.

LSU appears to be the aggressor in this recruitment under new head coach Lane Kiffin. The Tigers are working to get Longstreet on campus before any other program. Kiffin has a clear need at center with Garrett Nussmeier ineligible and backup Michael Van Buren transferring to USF. The head coach also has a track record of developing transfers like Jaxson Dart and Trinidad Chambliss.

Southern California Trojans quarterback Husan Longstreet (4)

Southern California Trojans quarterback Husan Longstreet (4) saw limited playing time in what will be a redshirt season in 2025. | Kirby Lee-Imagn Images

Longstreet has family roots in Louisiana, which could aid the Tigers. He was also intrigued by Kiffin during his high school recruitment when the coach was at Ole Miss. Kiffin has fully embraced a villain persona this offseason by attempting to flip Washington quarterback Demond Williams days after he signed a lucrative deal. That pursuit may have burned a bridge with fellow transfer target Sam Leavitt.

Oregon remains a major threat to land the talented passer despite the aggressive push from Baton Rouge. The Ducks join LSU as teams to watch closely, according to On3.

USC quarterback Husan Longstreet

Oregon and LSU are the two early frontrunners to land the services of former USC quarterback Husan Longstreet via the transfer portal. | Kirby Lee-Imagn Images

Head coach Dan Lanning is currently awaiting an NFL Draft decision from Dante Moore while also remaining in the mix for Dylan Raiola. Oregon has successfully used the portal to sign three consecutive starting quarterbacks, including Bo Nix and Dillon Gabriel.

The decision for Longstreet could hinge on immediate playing time and offensive fit. Oregon offensive coordinator Will Stein is departing to become the head coach at Kentucky which adds a variable to the Ducks’ pitch. USC will move forward with veteran Sam Huard as the primary backup to Maiava. Huard is playing for his fourth school in six years and recently threw a key pass on a fake punt against Northwestern.

Read more on College Football HQ



Link

Continue Reading

NIL

The unsung winner, loser of the 2025-26 college football season

Published

on


Just like any other college football season, this one has had a variety of stories both good and bad, but not all of them are created equal.

Yeah, we’ve heard about guys like Indiana (the favorite to win the natty) and Penn State (who took the biggest tumble from preseason hype), but what about those with telling performances that flew under the radar, the ones that haven’t been picked apart by the media? They deserve their own shares of the spotlight, and that’s precisely what they’ll be given today.

But the plan is not to simply sit here and list everyone that’s starting their offseason on a remotely good/bad note; rather, it’s to acknowledge the team that’s had the most encouraging run and the one that’s had the most discouraging…at least among those that virtually no one’s seeming to notice. With that said, the choice for our big winner in this equation should be rather agreeable.

Winner: Wake Forest

If you know anything about Wake Forest’s history in the football space, you know that the Demon Deacons usually have to take whatever they can get, but that wasn’t the case this season, as they finished with an objectively sound record of 9-4.

For a program so underhanded to do so well in these greedy times we live in is impressive on its own, but it involving both a road win over a ranked Virginia and a convincing bowl win over an SEC team (Mississippi State)—all while under the management of a first-year head coach in Jake Dickert—sounds borderline unbelievable.

That latter win made the 2025-26 campaign just the fourth to ever see the Deacs reach the nine-win threshold, and it also guaranteeing that the SEC wouldn’t amass a winning record against the ACC didn’t exactly kill any vibes either.

Loser: Nebraska

This selection may come off as weaker, as the Nebraska Cornhuskers are far removed from the days of their mediocrity being a surprise, but to me? This season was the first where they truly felt irredeemable.

Last season’s Huskers weren’t great, but by making and winning a bowl game against a Power 4 opponent to go positive, it appeared as if a page towards relevance was at least beginning to turn. When combining that with head coach Matt Rhule’s fame for his miracle-working usually paying off in his third year with a team (which was this season), some might have argued that 2025 should’ve been a breakthrough…yet here we are.

Despite starting its 2025 slate 7-3, Nebraska entered the Las Vegas Bowl 7-5 after suffering back-to-back blowouts against a struggling, interim-led Penn State, and rival Iowa. As for how things went in Vegas, the Cornhuskers got decimated again, this time against Utah, another team that had recently lost a legendary head coach. That left them with the same 7-6 tally they put up in ‘24, quantifying the lack of improvement.

Especially when other members of the Big Ten are successfully proving their conference to now be college football’s best, few endings are as disheartening as that one was for Nebraska—and just when you thought the gods of this great sport couldn’t test Huskers fans any harder.



Link

Continue Reading

NIL

College football transfer portal: Power Four teams with most 2026 departures

Published

on


The transfer portal has never moved this fast, or this early. Ten days into the winter window — which opened Jan. 2 and runs through Jan. 16 — 25 Power Four college football programs have already reached the 25-player mark in terms of entries as of Sunday morning. That level of turnover typically takes weeks to accumulate. For perspective, 38 Power Four teams reached that threshold across both portal windows last cycle, a process that stretched 40 total days between winter and spring.

This year’s accelerated pace reflects a shifting reality in college football. Roster decisions are being made earlier, with NIL and rev-share leverage and immediate eligibility compressing timelines for both players and staff. While coaching turnover remains a major driver of mass exits, it no longer explains the full scope of the movement.

Of the 18 Power Four programs with the most departures so far this cycle, 11 experienced a head coaching change. The other seven did not — a group navigating heavy roster churn despite overall staff continuity.

Below is a closer look at those Power Four teams without a coaching change that have seen the highest portal attrition so far during this shortened window, and what those departures actually mean beyond the raw numbers.

College football’s transfer portal has spun out of control

Brad Crawford

College football's transfer portal has spun out of control

After posting the second-highest number of transfer portal departures among Power Four programs across both windows of the 2024-25 cycle last year following its coaching transition back to Rich Rodriguez, West Virginia finds itself near the top of the list again. This time, however, the Mountaineers lead all Power Four teams that did not undergo a coaching change, with 46 players exiting via the portal as of Saturday evening.

That raw number, however, needs context.

Only four of those players started at least six games, and just 10 logged 200 or more snaps during the 2025 season, limiting the overall damage to the depth chart. Still, West Virginia did lose meaningful production. Top receiver Cam Vaughn, as well as leading rushers Diore Hubbard and Cyncir Bowers all entered the portal, a notable blow for an offense searching for continuity.

That trio accounted for 11 of West Virginia’s 33 offensive touchdowns this season.

Mike Norvell faces immense pressure to get Florida State back on track in Tallahassee after back-to-back disappointing seasons. That turnaround, however, will once again require significant roster reconstruction. Florida State has the second-most transfer portal departures this cycle among Power Four programs that did not undergo a coaching change.

The most immediate impact has come on the defensive side of the ball. Safeties Edwin Joseph and Earl Little Jr. — who initially declared for the 2026 NFL Draft before entering the portal Tuesday — are the only two departures who started double-digit games. Still, the volume of experience leaving the roster is notable.

Six additional transfers made at least six starts, a figure that doesn’t even include two of the most surprising exits of the cycle: twin defensive linemen Darryll Desir and Mandrell Desir. Both were widely expected to remain in Tallahassee but now rank among the highest-rated edge rushers in Cooper Petagna’s 247Sports transfer portal rankings.

In total, 10 departing Seminoles logged at least 200 snaps this season, leaving Florida State with real snaps — not just roster spots — to replace as Norvell reshapes the roster yet again.

Deion Sanders’ year-to-year rebuild at Colorado begins again. With 35 players entering the transfer portal already this cycle, the Buffaloes are set for another roster reset — but in Sanders’ model, that’s part of the plan, not a setback.

The defensive backfield has taken the hardest hit. Cornerback DJ McKinney, as well as safeties Tawfiq Byard and Carter Soutmire — three of the most experienced starters — are gone, leaving significant gaps in coverage. Offensively, leading receiver Omarion Miller and several linemen depart, meaning Colorado must replace production as well as depth once again. In total, 13 portal exits logged at least 200 snaps this season with six of those being starters.

For Colorado, the 2026 season will test Sanders’ philosophy again: can a continuous transfer‑first approach build enough cohesion and sustained production to compete in the Big 12?

At first glance, Mississippi State’s placement on this list may raise eyebrows, but the context is important. Of the Bulldogs’ 34 transfer portal departures this cycle, only one was a regular starter: defensive lineman Kedrick Bingley-Jones. Just four other players logged more than 200 snaps during the season — offensive lineman Jimothy Lewis Jr., who split time between left and right tackle; wide receiver Jordan Mosley, who caught eight passes on 16 targets; and defensive backs Tony Mitchell and Jayven Williams, reserve players who combined for 43 tackles.

For coach Jeff Lebby and his staff, that’s not particularly alarming. Much of the Bulldogs’ roster turnover has come from depth players rather than key contributors. Mississippi State was in a similar situation during the previous cycle, losing 39 players across both windows — only four of whom were starters.

In other words, while the portal activity is high in volume yet again, the impact on immediate on-field production is limited. 

Until this cycle, Dave Aranda’s program had quietly been one of the more stable operations in the portal era. Baylor entered the winter having lost just 55 players across the previous four transfer cycles — tied for the third-fewest among current Power Four teams, alongside Iowa and behind only Clemson and Northwestern with 44 each.

That context makes this cycle stand out.

Baylor now sits among the top 15 Power Four programs in total departures and ranks tied for fifth among teams that didn’t undergo a coaching change, with 30 exits — already 11 more than the Bears lost in the previous cycle alone. More notably, the attrition cuts into production. Nine departing players logged at least 200 snaps and six of those were regular starters.

The losses span every level of the roster. Interior offensive lineman Coleton Price, the top-ranked IOL transfer in Cooper Petagna’s 247Sports portal rankings, is gone. Linebacker Keaton Thomas leaves after leading the team with 99 total tackles, while safety DJ Coleman and linebacker Emar’rion Winston take proven defensive snaps with them. 

Offensively, Bryson Washington’s exit looms largest after he rushed for 1,816 yards and scored 20 total touchdowns over the past two seasons.

For Baylor, this isn’t just volume — it’s a break from recent precedent as Dave Aranda tries to steady a program that’s seen uneven results six seasons into his tenure.

The portal wasn’t around the last time Scott Frost was building a roster at UCF. During his first stint in Orlando in 2016 and 2017, transfers were few and far between. This time around, the rebuild is unfolding in a far more volatile environment — and the volume reflects it. UCF has seen 30 players enter the portal this cycle, a notable number as Frost continues to reshape the roster for his second tenure.

Like some of the teams near the top of this list, the Knights have lost meaningful contributors. Four departing players were regular starters in 2025. Wide receiver DJ Black finished as the team’s fourth-leading receiver with 273 yards and two touchdowns. Defensive lineman John Walker, a 320-pound interior presence, totaled 39 tackles and was a key piece of the rotation up front. Quarterback Tayven Jackson made 10 starts, while center Carter Miller started nine games before injuries cut his season short.

Beyond those starters, the attrition extends into the rotation. Defensive lineman Rodney Lora, edge rusher Jamaal Johnson and tight end Kylan Fox each logged at least 200 snaps, further chipping away at experienced depth.

Other Power Four programs without a coaching change that have already reached the 25-departure mark include Ohio State (29), Louisville (28), North Carolina (27), Syracuse (26), Illinois (25), Kansas (25), Oklahoma (25) and Tennessee (25).





Link

Continue Reading

NIL

Joel Klatt describes Kyle Whittingham hire at Michigan as a ‘tremendous fit’

Published

on


The hiring of Kyle Whittingham at Michigan may have caught much of the college football world off guard. However, FOX Sports analyst Joel Klatt believes the move checks every box the Wolverines needed to address.

Speaking on The Joel Klatt Show, Klatt called Michigan’s decision to bring in Whittingham a “home run,” citing the unique challenges surrounding the search, and how seamlessly the longtime Utah head coach fits the moment in Ann Arbor.

“This seems like a tremendous fit. This seems like a home run because it checks off all of these boxes,” Klatt said. “The timing is a challenge. The play-identity is a challenge. Culture reset and stabilization, that’s a challenge. Any one of those four is going to be very difficult to find. And yet, Kyle Whittingham checks the box in all four.”

Alas, Michigan moved quickly after firing Sherrone Moore earlier last month following an investigation into an inappropriate relationship with a staff member. The timing of the opening, coinciding with the start of the transfer portal and a limited coaching market, made the search particularly difficult. Many around the sport believed Michigan would be forced into a short-term or high-risk hire.

Instead, the Wolverines landed one of the most respected and stable figures in college football. Whittingham spent 22 seasons at Utah, compiling a 177–88 record while building the program into a consistent national presence.

He won two Pac-12 championships, produced eight double-digit win seasons and famously finished 13–0 in 2008, capped by a Sugar Bowl victory over Alabama. His teams became known for their physicality, discipline and consistency, traits Michigan is eager to reestablish.

Many assumed Whittingham’s resignation from Utah signaled retirement. Instead, the 64-year-old opted for a new challenge, stepping into a Michigan program just two years removed from a national championship in 2023. With Big Ten resources, elite recruiting infrastructure and a roster still stocked with high-level talent, Klatt believes the move is about more than stability.

“He looks at this as an opportunity to actually go out there and compete for a national championship,” Klatt claimed. He certainly has the chance to do so now.

After weeks of uncertainty, Michigan appears to have found exactly what it needed in Whittingham. A proven winner, steady hand and a coach capable of restoring trust while keeping the Wolverines firmly in the national title conversation.



Link

Continue Reading

NIL

USA Today sends Alabama, Georgia, LSU, Florida, and Texas A&M a black-pilled message

Published

on


Ahead of the Indiana Hoosiers and Miami Hurricanes’ clash in the 2026 College Football Playoff National Championship Game on Monday, January 19, the SEC’s absence from a third-straight title game has many thinking the conference’s demise is here.

USA Today’s Matt Hayes is one of those people. Hayes called out the Alabama Crimson Tide, Georgia Bulldogs, LSU Tigers, Florida Gators, and Texas A&M Aggies by name for failing their sky-high expectations in the NIL/rev-share era.

As Hayes pointed out, Texas Tech Red Raiders superbooster and Fort Worth oilman Cody Campbell has built a program with rev-share payouts that used to resemble the schools that “didn’t pay” their players before student athletes started cashing sanctioned paychecks.

“There are millionaires and billionaires who love their universities and are obsessive about winning. Throw open the doors to NIL and free player movement — and legalized big booster involvement — and watch how quickly the SEC looks like the ACC,” Hayes wrote.

“Watch how quickly Alabama comes back to the pack, and Georgia can’t get out of the quarterfinals in the CFP. How quickly LSU and Florida and Texas A&M spend hundreds of millions of dollars to fire coaches and start over. 

“More to the point, watch how quickly the deep-pocket Cody Campbells of the world begin to simply play by the rules laid out by the SEC and Big Ten ― and build teams that look and play like SEC teams of the past.”

What Campbell is doing in the open, with public information on all salaries available at a state school per an information request, is more honorable than the bagmen of years past, who gave the “It Just Means More” tagline a devilish undertone. Obligatory mention of the cars Crimson Tide players were driving during their dominant 2010s era.

It’s just sad to see this change, since societies in the south were built on winning football.

Auburn’s fall in the rev-share/NIL era is understated, but it’s still a thing

Going from a College Football world that once saw Alabama win every other year, Georgia doing the same at the very end, and schools like LSU and Florida formerly dominated before, or right when Nick Saban arrived in Tuscaloosa, is more dramatic than going to a world where the Auburn Tigers went from an 8-10-win team to a perennial loser.

That doesn’t mean Auburn’s fall hasn’t happened. It has, and it’s been stark. It’s the same world, and it’s the one we’re living in.

As the Plains sees new, modern structures being erected everywhere, there is a lack of the same character from when the team was winning games, and the Auburn Creed meant something. From the sounds of it, the Creed’s principles were absent under the last two full-time head football coaches’ regimes.

Just like the perennial contenders in the conference, the Tigers need to figure out how to restore glory and make “It Just Means More” hit like it used to. Easier said than done, but all sports are cyclical, and the current CFB landscape will always favor the SEC and Big Ten.

So it should happen sometime in the future. Especially with a different personality like Alex Golesh in tow.

Only time will tell, though.



Link

Continue Reading

NIL

Florida football transfer tracker as Jon Sumrall works the portal for 2026 class

Published

on


Updated Jan. 10, 2026, 9:46 p.m. ET



Link

Continue Reading

Most Viewed Posts

Trending