Connect with us
https://yoursportsnation.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/call-to-1.png

NIL

Prominent Baltimore non

Published

on

Prominent Baltimore non

An influential nonprofit in Baltimore that receives funding from federal, state, and city government agencies is ending its fiscal management services for local charities, raising questions about how it handles taxpayer money.

Fusion Partnerships announced an end to its more than two-decade-old fiscal sponsorship program this year, potentially impacting dozens of organizations in the Baltimore area that rely on financial services. Fiscal sponsorships allow government agencies to award grants to organizations that do not have a tax-exempt status.

An audit of Fusion Partnerships issued in 2023 revealed the organization managed taxpayer dollars awarded by the federal and Maryland state governments. This included $1.4 million from federal agencies in 2022, and roughly $500,000 from Maryland state agencies from 2021 to 2022.

The audit showed Fusion handled grants for a variety of institutions, including three federal agencies, Maryland Department of Health, Maryland governor’s office, and the Baltimore City government. It is unclear if Fusion’s decision to end its fiscal sponsorships will impact the taxpayer-funded grant programs.

Brian Mittendorf is the H.P. Wolfe Chair in Accounting at Ohio State University, where he specializes in nonprofit accounting. He said stability is required for fiscal sponsorships to be successful.

“It provides some assurances having a well-vetted fiscal sponsor help with that and essentially help charities that would be eligible,” Mittendorf told Spotlight on Maryland. “The problem that you run into here is that the huge value a fiscal sponsor can bring is assurance and stability. And that seems to be what the problem was in the end is that the fiscal sponsor wasn’t able to offer that ongoing stability.”

The audit of Fusion was required because the organization received more than $1 million in federal grants. The audit was conducted by L. Abrams & Company, a Maryland-based law firm that detailed five “significant deficiencies” at Fusion, which included how the organization had inaccurate and missing financial documents.

Fusion did not respond to questions about how it plans to resolve its taxpayer-funded grant programs, instead telling Spotlight on Maryland that it is focused on ensuring its fiscally sponsored organizations are able to continue operations.

The largest grant handled by Fusion, according to the audit, was $530,796 from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) for “Harm Reduction Services.” The federal agency awarded the taxpayer funds to the Maryland Department of Health’s Prevention and Health Promotion Administration.

A spokesperson for the Maryland Health Department said the state agency gave the federal grant to Fusion on behalf of the Baltimore Harm Reduction Coalition (BHRC).

“Fusion operated as the fiscal sponsor for Baltimore Harm Reduction Coalition (BHRC), managing their funding, payroll, accounting, cash flow, etc. as the fiscal arm for BHRC during the grant period,” the Maryland Health Department spokesman told Spotlight on Maryland. “The grant provided harm reduction services through the non-profit BHRC who provides harm reduction services in downtown Baltimore City.”

The spokesman said the BHRC used the funds to provide clean drug paraphernalia and overdose services for drug users in 2022 — the only year of the program. BHRC provides kits for injecting, smoking, and snorting drugs, according to its website.

The Maryland Health Department gave $303,223 in state grants to Fusion from 2021 to 2022, according to the audit. The agency’s spokesman said the funds were also used for BHRC’s harm reduction services.

HHS gave another $257,426 to Fusion to manage two grants for Morgan State University, whose spokesperson told Spotlight on Maryland that “all awards are being actively wrapped up due to Fusion’s imminent closure and dissolution.”

An HHS spokeswoman told Spotlight on Maryland that the agency “does not comment on the details of its internal deliberation process related to grants to maintain the confidentiality and integrity of the process.”

The U.S. Department of Treasury gave Fusion $428,403 to handle COVID-19 relief funds for the Baltimore City government.

The U.S. Department of Justice gave Fusion $209,967 to manage a parole reentry program for the Governor’s Office of Crime and Prevention.

The Treasury Department, Justice Department, Baltimore City government, and Maryland governor’s office did not respond to questions about how the funds were used and if the programs are still active.

The Maryland State Arts Council (MSAC) gave Fusion a $55,604 grant, which a spokeswoman said was for fiscal sponsorship services that are now uncertain as the program dissolves.

“Fusion is working with grantees and MSAC to ensure that contractual obligations are fulfilled on a case-by-case basis,” the MSAC spokeswoman told Spotlight on Maryland. “Using a fiscal sponsor allows MSAC to distribute grant funds to communities where establishing nonprofits is a barrier.”

Mittendorf expressed concern about next steps when a fiscal sponsor program suddenly folds.

“Ultimately, the question is what happens if you get a grant on the basis of having a fiscal sponsor and then that fiscal sponsor goes away?” he told Spotlight on Maryland. “That, of course, would put the grant in jeopardy.”

Fusion received at least $3 million in Baltimore City taxpayer dollars since 2020, as previously reported by Spotlight on Maryland.

Despite receiving funds from the local, state, and federal government, Fusion does not list any income under the government grants section of its nonprofit tax forms dating back to 2015.

Fusion paid the IRS federal tax liens in 2021 and faced a lawsuit from its former executive director that same year who alleged financial mismanagement at the organization, as previously reported by Spotlight on Maryland. Fusion denied allegations in the lawsuit and the two parties agreed to dismiss the case in 2022.

Baltimore City has struggled to maintain its fiscal sponsors in recent years, as previously reported by Spotlight on Maryland. Strong City Baltimore similarly ended its fiscal sponsorship program in 2021. Thrive Arts collapsed in 2023 after operating for less than two years.

Spotlight on Maryland is a joint venture by FOX45 News and The Baltimore Sun. Have a news tip? Contact Patrick Hauf at pjhauf@sbgtv.com. Follow him on X @PatrickHauf.

NIL

$2.1 million SEC quarterback announces he’ll forgo NFL Draft, return for 2026

Published

on


One College Football Playoff program just received some major positive news ahead of their postseason run. One of the many flaws in the current CFB calendar is that players really have to make decisions on their futures before the playoffs are over, since they could be playing well into January — and past the deadline for transferring. Then, there’s the NFL Draft and that process to think about.

Luckily for Texas A&M, they have full assurance that their star quarterback, Marcel Reed, is fully locked in on the Aggie program amid any portal offers or professional attention. As part of an interview with former Heisman Trophy winner Robert Griffin III, Reed confirmed his intention to remain with A&M program next fall, returning for his junior season. On a recent episode of Griffin’s podcast, Outta Pocket, Reed as was asked point-blank whether he is coming back to Texas A&M for the 2026 season. His response:

“I’m coming back,” he said with a head nod. “I’ll be back.” Griffin went on to comment that, from his view, A&M seemed like the ideal home for Marcel Reed.

“I do too,” Reed responded, agreeing that A&M is the perfect fit. “I mean, I got offers after my freshman year, ” he added. “I thought that this was the best place to be. I didn’t think there was any reason to leave Texas A&M. I have the job and it’s mine to lose. But like, there’s no reason for me to leave.”

Marcel Reed stats, NIL valuation

Texas A&M Aggies quarterback Marcel Reed (10)

Texas A&M Aggies quarterback Marcel Reed (10) | Jay Biggerstaff-Imagn Images

The good folks at On3 put together a formula for calculating a player’s NIL and roster value based on real reporting on player compensation plus social media exposure and overall talent level. According to their esteemed metric, Marcel Reed checks in with a $2.1 million NIL evaluation. That puts him No. 13 among current college football players and No. 17 among all college athletes.

As a starting quarterback for one of the top 10 teams in the nation this season, you wouldn’t think there’s much reason for Marcel Reed to transfer away from Texas A&M. However, after the stellar year he put together, NFL scouts certainly have him on the radar.

Across 12 regular season games, Reed threw for just under 3,000 yards and will almost certainly eclipse that milestone in the postseason. He also tossed 25 touchdowns vs. just 10 interceptions and added another six touchdowns as a runner to give him more than 30 on the year. Reed’s rushing tally is currently 466 yards. Easily one of the best dual threat quarterbacks in the country, Reed projects to return to a contending Aggie squad in 2026 as a Heisman Trophy frontrunner and potential NFL first round pick,.

More on College Football HQ



Link

Continue Reading

NIL

Dick Vitale finds College Football Playoff selection committee far from awesome, baby

Published

on


Dickie V knows football

Dick Vitale is well-known and loved as a passionate broadcaster and follower of college basketball. His boundless enthusiam and endless catch phrases have dominated college basketball for several decades. But Vitale pretty clearly knows the gridiron as well, and directed some harsh comments on Sunday to the College Football Playoff selection committee. The topic of discussion was Notre Dame, long a Vitale favorite, as he acknowledged 11 family members who have graduated from the school.

Notre Dame’s rough situation

Notre Dame was ranked as the first team out of the College Football Playoff. The two biggest points of contention for the Irish and their fans are that three-loss Alabama remained ahead of them despite a 28-point loss in the SEC championship game, and that Miami– consistently ranked behind Notre Dame in the CFP weekly rankings– somehow jumped them in the final week despite neither team playing a game.

Vitale speaks out

Vitale shared a video to social media with comments he directed straight toward the CFP selection committee.

I’m really having a tough time. Every Tuesday for five consecutive weeks, you post on ESPN, the teams you think, the top 12 that would be eligible at that time to qualify for the Playoffs. Every week, EVERY, not two of the weeks, but all five weeks, you had Notre Dame over Miami. You had Notre Dame in there every week. How logically do they drop out on the last week, when they’ve done nothing in terms of losing a game during that period? Miami lost two games to unranked teams. I have a real tough time with that…. How do you explain the five weeks of having Notre Dame there and then bouncing them? They did zilch in terms of anything in causing that to happen. They didn’t lose a game. They blew out everybody they played, and the bottom line is they got a raw deal. They got a raw deal. Those kids belong in the Playoffs.

Dick Vitale

Irish reaction

Despite the emotional pitch of his video– and Vitale acknowledges that he’s a fan of the Irish– it’s hard to argue with Vitale’s fundamental talking points. Notre Dame pretty clearly felt the sting of CFP exclusion, as the Irish then turned down non-CFP bowl berths, indicating that for the Irish, the season ended up as CFP or bust. But even if the Irish are outside the Playoff, they do have one of the most notable voices in college sports indicating that their CFP exclusion is a difficult-to-justify stance that wrongs an excellent team.

Irish

Despite ten straight wins to finish the regular season, Notre Dame missed the College Football Playoff, which angered the usually peaceful Dick Vitale. | Stan Szeto-Imagn Images





Link

Continue Reading

NIL

Every college football team that declined their bowl game on Sunday

Published

on


Years ago, schools basically cued in line to plead for a spot in a post-season bowl game. Of course, that was an era before every breakfast cereal, motor oil, or obscure mortgage company was sponsoring its own personal bowl game. But Sunday emphasized a growing trend with a number of teams saying ‘thanks, but no thanks’ to bowl berths on Sunday. The final count included at least 10 teams that turned down bowl berths.

The denials sprang from a variety of potential reasons– from pouting over exclusion from the College Football Playoff to teams not wishing the dive into postseason play in the midst of coaching changes to teams that had given up hope at a bowl and moved on with the offseason. But Sunday’s massive exodus of teams NOT playing in bowls certainly made some college football history.

The Wrath of the Irish

Notre Dame’s bowl denial will probably draw the most attention. The Irish finished one spot out of the College Football Playoff, and accordingly decided that they would pass on the gamut of lower bowls. Notre Dame was purportedly offered a spot in the Pop-Tarts Bowl to play the team ranked behind them in the CFP rankings, BYU, but turned it down flat.

All of college football (and even some college basketball celebrities) weighed in on the propriety of the Irish bowl declination, but it’s a massive move that could reverberate throughout future bowl seasons.

Two Big 12 Coaching Shifts

Kansas State and Iowa State each turned down bowl invitations. In both cases, there are coaching transitions underway. Iowa State lost Matt Campbell to Penn State and is replacing him with Jimmy Rogers. Kansas State saw Chris Kliemann retire and Collin Klein replace him.

Despite the business excuse, the Big 12 made it clear that the decision was not a popular one at the league level. Both schools were fined $500,000 for turning down bowl bids.

Bowl Denial Dominoes (or Sunday Choas for the Birmingham Bowl)

While the NCAA had exactly the number of teams with six or more wins that it needed to fill the bowl vacancies, these three teams declining bowl berths caused the bowls to have to dip into the pool of 5-7 teams. A multitude of 5-7 teams declined bowl bids before Appalachian State finally completed the bowl picture by agreeing to play Georgia Southern in the Birmingham Bowl.

At least seven teams were reported to have turned down last-minute bowl invites off of 5-7 seasons. The list includes Florida State, Auburn, UCF, Baylor, Rutgers, Temple, and Kansas. The 11th hour bowl chaos led to more than a few jokes online. While the 82nd bowl berth was finally filled, at least 10 teams passed on postseason play on a memorable Sunday.





Link

Continue Reading

NIL

Are Ohio companies interested in NIL deals with high school athletes?

Published

on


Dec. 8, 2025, 6:05 a.m. ET

Fred Horner bleeds black and orange.

The owner of Advanced Industrial Roofing is a Massillon football booster and member of the Sideliner program, an initiative where community members act as mentors for varsity players, providing personal guidance and support.

He’s willing to help out Washington High School athletes any way he can. But don’t expect his company to start handing out lucrative name, image and likeness deals to high school students now that the agreements are legal in Ohio.



Link

Continue Reading

NIL

The College Football Playoff Committee took the messy route, but still landed on the right bracket

Published

on


If you want to hammer the College Football Playoff Committee for taking the scenic route on the way to the final bracket reveal, go ahead. That wasn’t the path many of us would have taken, especially if the goal were to set a clear expectation of what the final CFP bracket would look like.

Through more than a month of nationally televised CFP rankings shows, the Committee insisted on keeping Notre Dame slotted ahead of Miami. It didn’t matter that Miami possessed a head-to-head win and an identical record. The Committee told us repeatedly that it felt Notre Dame was better. As a result, we believed that’s what the people in that conference room in Grapevine, Texas, would do at the end.

They didn’t. On Sunday, when the final bracket featured Miami and not Notre Dame, it caused confusion and frustration. No, it was a shock. People couldn’t fathom how two idle teams could be flipped on Selection Sunday when neither team played during championship weekend.

We’ll get into why that happened later, but here’s the important thing: It’s not about the journey, it’s about the destination. And the destination was unequivocally correct. The games still matter and the notions of what we — or the people on the Committee — think would happen in the future didn’t come into play, even if we spent the last month thinking they would.

Miami couldn’t have been left out of the bracket while maintaining the integrity of the games. Had the CFP Committee included Notre Dame and not Miami, what they think would have taken priority over what happened on the field. Notre Dame and Miami’s resumes were similar enough that the result of the game had to matter the most. It couldn’t be ignored. It wasn’t.

If it wound up being ignored, that would have thrown the selection process into a chaotic world where the Committee members could veer from the guardrails — the games – and do whatever they want. So for at least another year, we get to live in a world where the CFP Committee leaned on the results of the games more than personal notions.

If you want to get into why the CFP Committee made this harder on themselves, that’s fine. They could have ranked Miami higher from the get-go, which would have stripped away all of the shock and confusion Notre Dame fans are feeling right now. The Committee made this harder for no reason.

So what’s the explanation for how the jump happened?

“Not until they really got to close proximity — side by side — with the move with BYU were we able to evaluate just those two teams. We always had someone between them,” CFP Committee chair Hunter Yurachek said on ESPN’s broadcast.

It’s all nonsense. How the CFP Committee could ignore the result of that game until its final deliberations doesn’t really make sense. If you’re questioning the process, please do it. There are plenty of holes to poke. But poking the process after the results are right is much better than poking the process after unjust results.

That brings us to Alabama, which got in despite losing to Florida State at the beginning of the year and getting blown off the field by Georgia in the SEC title game Saturday. Why didn’t Notre Dame and Miami go? How did Alabama get in still? Well, it all came back to who you beat.

Yes, Alabama had one more loss than Notre Dame. But its strength of schedule — which ranked No. 11 in comparison to Notre Dame at No. 42 and Miami at No. 44 — carried the day. Contrary to the propaganda the SEC dispersed last year about being penalized for playing tougher schedules, Alabama was actually forgiven for the extra loss because it beat Georgia during the regular season. That’s the benefit of playing in a tougher conference. You get a mulligan.

People have reason to be upset because of the unorthodox path the CFP Committee took.

But leaving Miami out in favor of Notre Dame would have been a miscarriage of justice. Feelings would have taken precedence over results, which ultimately means seasons could be simulated and teams could be slotted based on data.

This CFP Committee, more than others in the past, felt erratic. It felt like this Committee could have done something unconventional. But at the end of the road, it did what was right.

Even if you’re angry, be happy about that.



Link

Continue Reading

NIL

Major changes predicted after controversial College Football Playoff decision

Published

on


Whatever decisions the College Football Playoff selection committee eventually make, there seems to always be some form of controversy, and the 2025 bracket was no different after a consequential decision between Miami and Notre Dame.

With that controversy in mind, ESPN college football announcer Chris Fowler believes the playoff format and selection process could undergo yet more reform in the future.

More change could be on the way

“This is a bracket that’s going to be talked about forever. And not just because Notre Dame got excluded. But because of the framework that created the choices that the committee had to make,” Fowler said on Sunday’s selection show.

Fowler pointed to the “tweak” the College Football Playoff made a year ago, when it ended the confusing distinction between seeding and ranking, and believes another structural alteration could follow after this year’s dilemma.

“There’s going to be something more than a tweak going forward because all of a sudden, inclusivity, which most people in the sport think is a pretty good idea…

“Inclusivity sounds good until teams like Notre Dame and Texas and Vanderbilt get squeezed out. Then people have a serious problem with it.” he said.

Notre Dame felt it coming

Schools take a brave face in public when they have a chance to make the playoff, but the reality behind the scenes is often a little more nerve-racking.

Fowler added: “This is one we’re going to talk about for a long, long time. If you’re Notre Dame, you’re crushed. They were worried about this.” 

“I know they projected confidence, but there was a lot of unease on the part of Marcus Freeman and others because they saw them drop last week and now in consecutive weeks without playing, they have dropped in the rankings. And it ends up costing them despite a 10-game winning streak to finish the season.” 

Miami over Notre Dame was the right call

Notre Dame had been ranked ahead of Miami in the College Football Playoff rankings until Selection Day itself, when they swapped the Irish for the lower-ranked Hurricanes at the most crucial moment.

Still, despite whatever criticism there may be around the selectors’ decision-making process or timing, what happened on the field still should trump everything else, the ESPN veteran says.

“I have no problem with Miami getting in based on the head-to-head, even though it was early in the season,” Fowler said. 

“They won that game at the line of scrimmage… That was real. It was a late field goal that won it, but it still matters. And I think has to matter, or there’s no incentive to schedule any kind of meaningful non-conference game. 

“That’s not the committee’s job to protect that, or the committee’s job to protect with a sentimental eye [the] conference championship games, but those are also in danger, as we know, going forward.”

Read more from College Football HQ



Link

Continue Reading
Rec Sports3 minutes ago

Max Strus’ second annual Bowl the Land event passed memories forward — just like his uncle once did for him

Sports15 minutes ago

Women’s Lacrosse Brings On 12 New Faces for 2026-27 Academic Year

Motorsports16 minutes ago

Viking Motorsports Expands to Two-Car Operation for 2026 NASCAR O’Reilly Auto Parts Series Season

Rec Sports20 minutes ago

A track meet that pushes girls to greatness

Rec Sports27 minutes ago

Cleveland Cavs’ Max Strus hosts 2nd annual Bowl the Land event

Sports31 minutes ago

Vixen Volleyball Serves Up Comeback Season • Sweet Briar College

Motorsports32 minutes ago

NASCAR Driver Logan Misuraca Set to Return to Daytona for 2026 ARCA Menards Series Opener with City Garage Motorsports

Rec Sports37 minutes ago

Pottsgrove’s youth movement has program building back toward the postseason

Technology41 minutes ago

How India’s Growing Tech Sector Is Powering the Global Online Gaming Boom

NIL42 minutes ago

$2.1 million SEC quarterback announces he’ll forgo NFL Draft, return for 2026

Sports47 minutes ago

Introducing Vandal Volleyball’s Fall Signees, Gabby Marshall & Zola Zuccolo

Motorsports48 minutes ago

NASCAR driver who won at Daytona dies at 39

Rec Sports2 hours ago

Qatar launches ‘Aim Beyond’ project to empower youth through sport | PRESS-RELEASES

Sports2 hours ago

No. 12 BYU to face No. 22 Georgia Tech in the Pop-Tarts Bowl – BYU Athletics – Official Athletics Website

Motorsports2 hours ago

Richard Childress to Testify in NASCAR Antitrust Trial Amid Derogatory Texts and Revenue Dispute

Most Viewed Posts

Trending