Connect with us
https://yoursportsnation.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/call-to-1.png

NIL

What Barilla's Formula 1 move means for sports advertising beyond the Super Bowl

Published

on

What Barilla's Formula 1 move means for sports advertising beyond the Super Bowl

At 300 kilometers per hour, Formula 1 is all about speed, precision, and performance. Pasta, on the other hand, is slow-cooked comfort. But in today’s marketing landscape, unexpected pairings are often the most powerful—and that’s exactly what makes the recent partnership between Barilla and Formula 1 so intriguing.

Barilla’s new multi-year deal as an official partner of Formula 1 marks the latest in a wave of FMCG brands aligning with the sport—not just for visibility, but for storytelling. Following in the footsteps of KitKat and RedBull, Barilla is using the global stage of motorsport to reframe its brand around connection, culture, and experience.

For starters, one might question what does a plate of pasta have in common with a Formula 1 car? At first glance, not much but dig deeper and one might realise that the partnership works on multiple levels. At a product level, each domain needs a lot of craftsmanship and practice to deliver a high quality and well branded experience, said Prantik Mazumdar, president of TiE Singapore and SportsTech evangelist.

Don’t miss: Offside or on track: Why Manchester United fans have mixed reactions to the new stadium 

Additionally, Barilla group isn’t new to sports sponsorship given their past association and brand campaigns with tennis legends, Roger Federer and Coco Gauff. Moreover, Paolo Barilla, the company’s vice president and billionaire owner himself was a Formula 1 driver, who raced for the Minardi team in 1989-1990. “Given these associations, I think it makes for an interesting and intriguing angle for Barilla to come on board as a second-tier partner with the F1 and speed up their growth leveraging the category,” added Mazumdar. 

Similarly, Deborah Rowe, managing director of boutique sports and lifestyle PR agency, Talk of the Town said that both Formula 1 and Barilla are iconic brands with global reach. “Formula 1 is about high performance, precision, and passion – values Barilla shares in its approach to food and heritage. There’s also a growing trend of integrating lifestyle into sports,” said Rowe. 

While a pasta bar in the Formula 1 paddock may feel indulgent, it is also human and relatable. “Imagine the fan who experiences this at a Formula 1 race. The next time they watch Formula 1 from home; they may crave pasta. That’s where brand affinity starts: through consistent, meaningful moments,” added Rowe, stating that: 

F1 is no longer just about racing; it’s a lifestyle experience.

As such, FMCG brands stand to gain more than just visibility. They gain frequency, relevance and emotional storytelling. This is because Formula 1 offers not just global exposure but recurring touchpoints with fans. The season format also allows brands to build long-term narratives, unlike one-off sports events, said Rowe. 

“More importantly, it gives FMCGs the chance to become part of rituals. Just like a hotdog is synonymous with American Football, pasta could easily become a race-day staple. With the right storytelling and activation, that kind of brand association can be incredibly powerful,” she added.

Firstly, at the product level, each domain needs a lot of craftsmanship and practice to deliver a high quality and well branded experience. Beyond that, the Barilla group isn’t new to sports sponsorship given their past association and stellar brand campaigns with tennis legends, Roger Federer and Coco Gauff. Last but not least, Paolo Barilla, the company’s vice president and billionaire owner himself was a F1 driver, who raced for the Minardi team in 1989-1990.

Given these associations, I think it makes for an interesting and intriguing angle for Barilla to come on board as a second tier partner with the F1 and speed up their growth leveraging the category

That said, FMCG brands are not the only brands that stand to gain from partnering with Formula 1. This is for as long the partnership aligns and is authentic to the brands. In conversation with MARKETING-INTERACTIVE, Darrelle Eng, head of brand, Singapore Sports Hub said the strength of a partnership is not just about the dollars, but the impact and association of what it means for the brand.

“It can be at a strategic or tactical level, depending on the objective, whether it is purely for awareness or it is for association,” said Eng. Even then, Formula 1 is in the position to choose who and what they would like to partner with. 

Brands also have a choice of whether to partner with Formula 1 as a league or with a team. “Why choose Formula 1 and not a Formula 1 team or a Formula 1 driver? There is a distinction between wanting to sponsor a tour or a team or driver, it is ultimately dependent on what the objective is,” added Eng, explaining that brands could gain consistent exposure and awareness, but not loyalty as a partner of the sport. 

In addition, partnering a team or a driver may give less exposure due to performance, but may achieve greater loyalty from fans who follow said team or driver. Eng stated:

 “Ultimately, it is about the alignment of the brand to the audience that they are targeting and the authenticity of the partnership.”

Is Formula 1 the next Super Bowl? 

As Formula 1 continues to evolve into a lifestyle and entertainment platform, its appeal to consumer goods companies has never been clearer. With global reach, digital-first storytelling, and an increasingly younger, more engaged fanbase, Formula 1 offers brands a unique proposition. The question is no longer why companies such as Barilla are getting involved—but what this shift signals about the future of sponsorship, and how Formula 1 is offering something that even legacy platforms like the Super Bowl or major football leagues may not.

According to sportspreneur Padmanabhan Manickam, the rise of FMCG partnerships with Formula 1 points to a broader shift in the global sponsorship landscape—particularly in regions where traditional tentpole events such as the Super Bowl hold less sway.

“Formula 1 definitely reaches a global audience, especially in this part of the world—Asia—where the Super Bowl can be less relevant for consumers,” Padmanabhan explains. “There are only a few sporting properties with true mass appeal here. Football, especially the FIFA World Cup, remains a key sponsorship asset, but it only comes around every four years. Beyond that, the English Premier League has global dominance, but football as the whole world knows, is super crowded.” 

That’s where Formula 1 stands out. For FMCG brands, its regular race schedule and year-round visibility offer a level of consistency that’s hard to find elsewhere. “Formula 1 races happen regularly, and each event is backed by high-profile publicity. Continuous mass awareness is a no brainer for FMCG brands where high brand awareness amongst target consumers is a key requirement,” said Padmanabhan. 

He added that Formula 1 still offers room for brands to innovate and stand out, compared to more mature and crowded sports platforms. “Formula 1 still has plenty of room and space for FMCG brands. It is less crowded compared to much matured sporting events,” said Padmanabhan.

Mazumdar agrees, adding that: 

Barring soccer, Formula 1 is the only sport that offers this large global platform and a regular frequency to engage them, something even the Super Bowl can’t achieve given its geographical and season limitation.

Rowe echoes this, describing Formula 1 as a “storytelling powerhouse”—one that rivals the cultural impact of the Super Bowl. “The rise of ‘sportainment’ has changed how fans engage with sports. Many sporting leagues such as LIV Golf and the HSBC SVNS have adopted faster formats, more entertainment layers, and fan-centric innovations,” said Rowe. “This has attracted younger, digitally savvy audiences—and FMCG brands are taking note and want to be part of this high-energy space where sport, culture, and lifestyle intersect.”

A major catalyst in Formula 1’s transformation has been the success of Netflix’s Drive to Survive. “It’s helped fans connect deeply with the personalities behind the sport and made F1 more accessible and emotionally compelling. That kind of narrative depth is a dream for FMCG brands looking to build authentic connections,” Rowe explained. “They want to be part of these evolving stories, not just on race day but throughout the season.”

Formula 1 delivers global scale, regular engagement, and a luxury-meets-lifestyle narrative that allows brands to go far beyond a 30-second commercial. From VIP paddock experiences and digital activations to influencer collaborations and content creation, F1 offers a multi-layered sponsorship model with year-round visibility. “We’ve seen firsthand how blending sport with lifestyle elements such as music, food, and fan zones significantly boosts audience engagement,” added Rowe. “It’s this multi-sensory, emotionally resonant environment that makes F1 partnerships genuinely memorable and effective.”

However, Eng offers a different perspective, suggesting that comparing Formula 1 to the Super Bowl may be a case of apples and oranges. The Super Bowl is a one-off event, whereas Barilla’s association with Formula 1 is continuous—spanning 24 events across 21 countries. “Most importantly, is the ‘Super Bowl effect really what the sport or the industry wants?” said Eng. 

Eng also raises an important point about the nature of Super Bowl advertising: 

The Super Bowl has leaned on entertainment with the half-time show probably generating more views than maybe the game itself, so is it really the Super Bowl, or is it the half-time show generating the interest in brands to partner with?

What sets Formula 1 apart, Eng argues, is its unmatched level of aspiration. “To become a Formula 1 driver takes so much more than almost all other sports. You can pick up a racquet or a ball, you can run or swim nearly anywhere—but you can’t just get into a Formula 1 car and drive. The lack of accessibility to the equipment and the elite pathway to the sport makes it aspirational beyond just physical talent,” said Eng.

For brands such as Barilla, that aspirational quality aligns perfectly with its positioning. Barilla has clearly aligned itself with aspirational figures – Roger Federer, Coco Gauff, Michelin-starred chef Davide Oldani, stated Eng. Where Barilla is engaging with a global, high-value audience over time, Super Bowl advertisers are targeting the masses through volume and reach – primarily within a US-centric audience. 

Join us this coming 23 – 24 April for #Content360, a two-day extravaganza centered around three core thematic pillars: Challenging The Norm; Technology For Transformation; and Unlocking Imagination. Immerse yourself in learning to curate content with creativity, critical thinking, and confidence with us at Content360!

Related articles:    
KitKat teams up with Formula 1 to cater to growing diverse fanbase  
These were the top mentioned brands during the Formula 1 weekend 
Why are so many football athletes becoming the face of eCommerce lately? 

NIL

Why Georgia is in court to seek damages from Damon Wilson’s NIL deal

Published

on


Updated Dec. 5, 2025, 4:33 p.m. ET



Link

Continue Reading

NIL

Buddie Defends Dykes as TCU Fans Fume Over 8–4 Season

Published

on


TCU’s just-passed 8-4 regular season had many in the purple people masses as angry as a tourist who just paid $40 to park, and for many others as disappointed as when Junior brought home an F in civics.

Many have expressed themselves in much the same way of our old friend, the frontier prospector Gabby Johnson of “Blazing Saddles” fame: No sidewindin’, bushwackin’, hornswagglin’ cracker croaker is gonna rouin me bishen cutter!

TCU Athletic Director Mike Buddie gets it.

“I think there were 11 teams in our league this year whose fan bases wanted their coaches fired,” Buddie said on Friday morning at the FIFA World Cup Draw party at Billy Bob’s Texas, the world’s largest honky tonk. “That’s the culture that we live in. You can win [against a] ranked opponent, [next week against] ranked opponent, [a third straight win against a] ranked opponent, and then lose — they want you gone.

“It’s a new day and age.”

Like the mood of Paris in 1793 — cheers in the morning, pitchforks and the guillotine by dusk.

TCU finished in the middle of a congested Big 12 at 5-4. To put some perspective on its season, Texas finished 9-3. Of course, many UT fans think the Longhorns should win every game, too. No. 25 Missouri, like TCU, finished 8-4. So, too, did Tennessee and Iowa, two teams receiving votes in the AP poll. In the end, after 12 regular-season games, only two teams finished undefeated — Ohio State and Indiana. One of those teams will lose this weekend; they play each other.

North Carolina — guided by renowned football genius Bill Belichick — stumbled to 4–8, taking a season-opening black eye from TCU.

Just last year, Ohio State fans wanted coach Ryan Day on the nearest interstate out of town after the Buckeyes took the worst kind of a second loss of the season — to Michigan. That was on Nov. 30. By the end of January, they wanted to elect him governor after winning the national championship. 

The Horned Frogs will learn their postseason bowl destination on Sunday.

Dykes has gone 35-17 over four seasons at TCU, including 13-2 and a berth in the College Football Playoff championship game in his first season. That campaign included a victory over No. 2 Michigan in the Fiesta Bowl CFP semifinals.

TCU slipped to 5-7 in 2023 but went 9-4 last year and could do the same in 2025 with one last victory.

“We need to be better,” Buddie said. “We’re committed to getting better. I’m excited because nobody realizes that more than Sonny Dykes.

“He’s committed to addressing some needs that I think we have and more than ever before, what I do and how we strategically fundraise and approach people financially has a direct impact on your football program. I think Texas Tech showed us all that if you can build the most talented roster and develop them, really good things happen.”

Texas Tech, which is playing in the Big 12 Championship Game on Saturday against BYU, spent, according to reports and speculation, as much as $28 million on its football roster this season. The Red Raiders are No. 4 in the most recent CFP rankings.

Spending that kind of money is the result of a completely transformed landscape in college football. Colleges can now spend as much as $20.5 million on payroll for athletes in its various programs. That mostly impacts football and men’s basketball — those sports that generate the most revenue, the “revenue sports.”

Before that, each Division I school had an adjacent collective designed to allow athletes to cash in on their name, image, and likeness. That quickly evolved — devolved? — into merely paying athletes by writing checks out of the collective’s pool. Now completely legal after a U.S. Supreme Court case permitting athletes to receive compensation beyond traditional scholarships. The collectives simply became the mechanism to funnel those payments.

Most, if not all, of the collectives have now been merged with universities’ traditional athletics fundraising arm. NIL endorsement deals are now supposed to be just exactly that — an athlete endorsing a product, for example. I’m not exactly sure how all that sorts out.

“The landscape has changed, but we still have a ton of advantages in facilities and where we’re located and historical success,” said Buddie, who added that TCU also is “thoughtful and strategic in how we employ people.”

“We’re not in the business of paying $50 million buyouts for people to go away. And when you believe you’ve got the right person who’s already proven that he can win in the College Football Playoff, it’s incumbent on me to provide him every resource that he needs to be successful.”





Link

Continue Reading

NIL

Penn State football AD Pat Kraft rips recruiting, NIL in audio leak

Published

on


Updated Dec. 5, 2025, 5:27 p.m. ET



Link

Continue Reading

NIL

Wall Street Journal Article on NIL and Phillip Bell

Published

on


Article is about Phillip Bells High School experience and being shopped to different schools and 7 x 7 teams. Really sad situation.

A few quotes:

“Bell’s mother, who abused drugs, shopped him from school to school, demanding up to $72,000 a year, according to court filings, public records and interviews with relatives and others who knew the family. He also joined a club team that paid thousands of dollars a weekend.’

On his visit to OSU: “The hotel room where Bell’s mother and stepfather were staying was “trashed,” leaving an OSU coach with a bill for broken furniture, his high-school coach later told relatives. A Buckeyes coach subsequently informed Bell’s mother that the team wanted her son, but the “entourage” wasn’t welcome in Columbus, the high-school coach said.

OSU declined to comment.

Before they left Ohio, Barnes’ blood sugar spiked to life-threatening levels, she suffered a heart attack and was hospitalized for several days, according to public records.”

Hoping that with support from OSU that he can break the cycle and achieve great things!

This link is behind a paywall: https://www.wsj.com/us-news/football-high-school-nil-phillip-bell-81270bdf?mod=hp_lead_pos7

Definitely worth a read – there is definitely a downside to the money flowing to these athletes. Kinda makes me wonder about the Legend Bey situation.



Link

Continue Reading

NIL

Georgia sues Missouri edge rusher Damon Wilson for nearly $400K over NIL contract he signed with Bulldogs

Published

on


Georgia is attempting to get edge rusher Damon Wilson to pony up after his transfer to Missouri.

The school’s athletic association has filed a lawsuit against Wilson saying he owes $390,000 from the NIL contract he signed with the school’s collective in December 2024 ahead of Georgia’s College Football Playoff loss to Notre Dame. Wilson transferred after the 2024 season to Missouri and received one payment of $30,000.

Advertisement

Wilson, a junior, led Missouri with nine sacks and 9.5 tackles for loss this season. He had three sacks and 5.5 tackles for loss as a sophomore for the Bulldogs in 2024.

Georgia is claiming Wilson owes the balance of the base pay the contract stipulated he’d be paid via a liquidated damages claim. According to ESPN, Wilson’s deal with Classic City Collective was for $500,000 spread out over 14 monthly payments with two post-transfer portal bonuses of $40,000 and that he’d owe what was still set to be paid out to him if he left the team.

From ESPN:

“When the University of Georgia Athletic Association enters binding agreements with student-athletes, we honor our commitments and expect student-athletes to do the same,” athletics spokesperson Steven Drummond said in a statement to ESPN.

Georgia is not the first school to file a suit over NIL payments to a player who transferred. But the hard-line tactic is noteworthy, and may ultimately not work out in Georgia’s favor.

Advertisement

Schools typically do not ask coaches to pay out the balance of their contracts when leaving for another job. For example, Lane Kiffin did not have to pay Ole Miss what the school was scheduled to pay him over the rest of his deal with the school when he left for LSU. Instead, LSU paid Ole Miss $3 million for Kiffin to get out of his contract.

That situation happens all the time when coaches leave for new jobs. Their buyouts to get out of their contracts are far smaller than the buyouts schools owe when a coach is fired without cause.

And coaches are employees. Schools have long resisted that players be classified as employees and continue to do so even as the revenue-sharing era begins. The NCAA and its member schools have long clung to amateurism and that antiquated idea is why it took so long for players to get paid in the first place.



Link

Continue Reading

NIL

Georgia seeks $390K in NIL contract damages from Missouri football DE

Published

on


Dec. 5, 2025, 3:22 p.m. CT

Georgia athletics is taking Missouri football defensive end Damon Wilson II to court in a novel, nearly first-of-its-kind case over an NIL contract dispute. 

The news was first reported by ESPN’s Dan Wilson on Friday, Dec. 5. The Tribune confirmed the news through a university source and court documents filed in Georgia by the Bulldogs.

UGA is attempting to take Wilson into arbitration and is seeking $390,000 in liquidated damages from the star edge rusher, who transferred to the Tigers in January 2025, over what the university views as an unfulfilled contract in Athens. The lawsuit is not against the University of Missouri, only Wilson.

According to the ESPN report, Georgia is arguing that Wilson signed a contract — a common practice in the NIL era — with what was then UGA’s main NIL and marketing arm, Classic City Collective, in December 2024.



Link

Continue Reading

Most Viewed Posts

Trending