NIL
What Barilla's Formula 1 move means for sports advertising beyond the Super Bowl


At 300 kilometers per hour, Formula 1 is all about speed, precision, and performance. Pasta, on the other hand, is slow-cooked comfort. But in today’s marketing landscape, unexpected pairings are often the most powerful—and that’s exactly what makes the recent partnership between Barilla and Formula 1 so intriguing.
Barilla’s new multi-year deal as an official partner of Formula 1 marks the latest in a wave of FMCG brands aligning with the sport—not just for visibility, but for storytelling. Following in the footsteps of KitKat and RedBull, Barilla is using the global stage of motorsport to reframe its brand around connection, culture, and experience.
For starters, one might question what does a plate of pasta have in common with a Formula 1 car? At first glance, not much but dig deeper and one might realise that the partnership works on multiple levels. At a product level, each domain needs a lot of craftsmanship and practice to deliver a high quality and well branded experience, said Prantik Mazumdar, president of TiE Singapore and SportsTech evangelist.
Don’t miss: Offside or on track: Why Manchester United fans have mixed reactions to the new stadium
Additionally, Barilla group isn’t new to sports sponsorship given their past association and brand campaigns with tennis legends, Roger Federer and Coco Gauff. Moreover, Paolo Barilla, the company’s vice president and billionaire owner himself was a Formula 1 driver, who raced for the Minardi team in 1989-1990. “Given these associations, I think it makes for an interesting and intriguing angle for Barilla to come on board as a second-tier partner with the F1 and speed up their growth leveraging the category,” added Mazumdar.
Similarly, Deborah Rowe, managing director of boutique sports and lifestyle PR agency, Talk of the Town said that both Formula 1 and Barilla are iconic brands with global reach. “Formula 1 is about high performance, precision, and passion – values Barilla shares in its approach to food and heritage. There’s also a growing trend of integrating lifestyle into sports,” said Rowe.
While a pasta bar in the Formula 1 paddock may feel indulgent, it is also human and relatable. “Imagine the fan who experiences this at a Formula 1 race. The next time they watch Formula 1 from home; they may crave pasta. That’s where brand affinity starts: through consistent, meaningful moments,” added Rowe, stating that:
F1 is no longer just about racing; it’s a lifestyle experience.
As such, FMCG brands stand to gain more than just visibility. They gain frequency, relevance and emotional storytelling. This is because Formula 1 offers not just global exposure but recurring touchpoints with fans. The season format also allows brands to build long-term narratives, unlike one-off sports events, said Rowe.
“More importantly, it gives FMCGs the chance to become part of rituals. Just like a hotdog is synonymous with American Football, pasta could easily become a race-day staple. With the right storytelling and activation, that kind of brand association can be incredibly powerful,” she added.
Firstly, at the product level, each domain needs a lot of craftsmanship and practice to deliver a high quality and well branded experience. Beyond that, the Barilla group isn’t new to sports sponsorship given their past association and stellar brand campaigns with tennis legends, Roger Federer and Coco Gauff. Last but not least, Paolo Barilla, the company’s vice president and billionaire owner himself was a F1 driver, who raced for the Minardi team in 1989-1990.
Given these associations, I think it makes for an interesting and intriguing angle for Barilla to come on board as a second tier partner with the F1 and speed up their growth leveraging the category
That said, FMCG brands are not the only brands that stand to gain from partnering with Formula 1. This is for as long the partnership aligns and is authentic to the brands. In conversation with MARKETING-INTERACTIVE, Darrelle Eng, head of brand, Singapore Sports Hub said the strength of a partnership is not just about the dollars, but the impact and association of what it means for the brand.
“It can be at a strategic or tactical level, depending on the objective, whether it is purely for awareness or it is for association,” said Eng. Even then, Formula 1 is in the position to choose who and what they would like to partner with.
Brands also have a choice of whether to partner with Formula 1 as a league or with a team. “Why choose Formula 1 and not a Formula 1 team or a Formula 1 driver? There is a distinction between wanting to sponsor a tour or a team or driver, it is ultimately dependent on what the objective is,” added Eng, explaining that brands could gain consistent exposure and awareness, but not loyalty as a partner of the sport.
In addition, partnering a team or a driver may give less exposure due to performance, but may achieve greater loyalty from fans who follow said team or driver. Eng stated:
“Ultimately, it is about the alignment of the brand to the audience that they are targeting and the authenticity of the partnership.”
Is Formula 1 the next Super Bowl?
As Formula 1 continues to evolve into a lifestyle and entertainment platform, its appeal to consumer goods companies has never been clearer. With global reach, digital-first storytelling, and an increasingly younger, more engaged fanbase, Formula 1 offers brands a unique proposition. The question is no longer why companies such as Barilla are getting involved—but what this shift signals about the future of sponsorship, and how Formula 1 is offering something that even legacy platforms like the Super Bowl or major football leagues may not.
According to sportspreneur Padmanabhan Manickam, the rise of FMCG partnerships with Formula 1 points to a broader shift in the global sponsorship landscape—particularly in regions where traditional tentpole events such as the Super Bowl hold less sway.
“Formula 1 definitely reaches a global audience, especially in this part of the world—Asia—where the Super Bowl can be less relevant for consumers,” Padmanabhan explains. “There are only a few sporting properties with true mass appeal here. Football, especially the FIFA World Cup, remains a key sponsorship asset, but it only comes around every four years. Beyond that, the English Premier League has global dominance, but football as the whole world knows, is super crowded.”
That’s where Formula 1 stands out. For FMCG brands, its regular race schedule and year-round visibility offer a level of consistency that’s hard to find elsewhere. “Formula 1 races happen regularly, and each event is backed by high-profile publicity. Continuous mass awareness is a no brainer for FMCG brands where high brand awareness amongst target consumers is a key requirement,” said Padmanabhan.
He added that Formula 1 still offers room for brands to innovate and stand out, compared to more mature and crowded sports platforms. “Formula 1 still has plenty of room and space for FMCG brands. It is less crowded compared to much matured sporting events,” said Padmanabhan.
Mazumdar agrees, adding that:
Barring soccer, Formula 1 is the only sport that offers this large global platform and a regular frequency to engage them, something even the Super Bowl can’t achieve given its geographical and season limitation.
Rowe echoes this, describing Formula 1 as a “storytelling powerhouse”—one that rivals the cultural impact of the Super Bowl. “The rise of ‘sportainment’ has changed how fans engage with sports. Many sporting leagues such as LIV Golf and the HSBC SVNS have adopted faster formats, more entertainment layers, and fan-centric innovations,” said Rowe. “This has attracted younger, digitally savvy audiences—and FMCG brands are taking note and want to be part of this high-energy space where sport, culture, and lifestyle intersect.”
A major catalyst in Formula 1’s transformation has been the success of Netflix’s Drive to Survive. “It’s helped fans connect deeply with the personalities behind the sport and made F1 more accessible and emotionally compelling. That kind of narrative depth is a dream for FMCG brands looking to build authentic connections,” Rowe explained. “They want to be part of these evolving stories, not just on race day but throughout the season.”
Formula 1 delivers global scale, regular engagement, and a luxury-meets-lifestyle narrative that allows brands to go far beyond a 30-second commercial. From VIP paddock experiences and digital activations to influencer collaborations and content creation, F1 offers a multi-layered sponsorship model with year-round visibility. “We’ve seen firsthand how blending sport with lifestyle elements such as music, food, and fan zones significantly boosts audience engagement,” added Rowe. “It’s this multi-sensory, emotionally resonant environment that makes F1 partnerships genuinely memorable and effective.”
However, Eng offers a different perspective, suggesting that comparing Formula 1 to the Super Bowl may be a case of apples and oranges. The Super Bowl is a one-off event, whereas Barilla’s association with Formula 1 is continuous—spanning 24 events across 21 countries. “Most importantly, is the ‘Super Bowl effect really what the sport or the industry wants?” said Eng.
Eng also raises an important point about the nature of Super Bowl advertising:
The Super Bowl has leaned on entertainment with the half-time show probably generating more views than maybe the game itself, so is it really the Super Bowl, or is it the half-time show generating the interest in brands to partner with?
What sets Formula 1 apart, Eng argues, is its unmatched level of aspiration. “To become a Formula 1 driver takes so much more than almost all other sports. You can pick up a racquet or a ball, you can run or swim nearly anywhere—but you can’t just get into a Formula 1 car and drive. The lack of accessibility to the equipment and the elite pathway to the sport makes it aspirational beyond just physical talent,” said Eng.
For brands such as Barilla, that aspirational quality aligns perfectly with its positioning. Barilla has clearly aligned itself with aspirational figures – Roger Federer, Coco Gauff, Michelin-starred chef Davide Oldani, stated Eng. Where Barilla is engaging with a global, high-value audience over time, Super Bowl advertisers are targeting the masses through volume and reach – primarily within a US-centric audience.
Join us this coming 23 – 24 April for #Content360, a two-day extravaganza centered around three core thematic pillars: Challenging The Norm; Technology For Transformation; and Unlocking Imagination. Immerse yourself in learning to curate content with creativity, critical thinking, and confidence with us at Content360!
Related articles:
KitKat teams up with Formula 1 to cater to growing diverse fanbase
These were the top mentioned brands during the Formula 1 weekend
Why are so many football athletes becoming the face of eCommerce lately?
NIL
Why Georgia is in court to seek damages from Damon Wilson’s NIL deal
Updated Dec. 5, 2025, 4:33 p.m. ET
The Georgia Athletic Association is seeking $390,000 from former Georgia football player Damon Wilson after he transferred to Missouri in January, weeks after agreeing to an NIL deal with the Classic City Collective.
The Classic City Collective, which shut down earlier this year, demanded that Wilson pay liquidated damages, based off the language of the contract. Wilson did not respond, according to online records in Superior Court of Athens-Clarke County.
The UGAAA then served a demand for arbitration on Wilson on Aug. 25, and he again did not respond, court records state. UGAAA holds all rights under agreements formerly held by the collective, Wilson was told in a letter sent to him by attorney Spence Johnson, representing UGAAA.
“When the University of Georgia Athletic Association enters binding agreements with student-athletes, we honor our commitments and expect student-athletes to do the same,” Georgia deputy athletic director Steven Drummond said Dec. 5 in a prepared statement given to the Athens Banner-Herald.
The application to compel arbitration was filed in court on Oct. 17. ESPN first reported about the dispute on Dec. 5.
Wilson and the Classic City Collective agreed to a contract worth $500,000, to run from Dec. 1, 2024 to Jan. 31, 2026. Wilson received the first monthly payment of $30,000 on Dec. 25, 2024, court records state.
Wilson was served a summons on Nov. 25 in Missouri and has 30 days to respond.
Wilson, a defensive end, is third in the SEC in sacks with 9 this season for the Tigers. Georgia, meanwhile, is last in the SEC this season with 17 sacks as a team.
Wilson played 26 games for Georgia in 2023 and 2024, registering 3.5 sacks and two caused fumbles. His departure was a blow for a defense that also lost eventual NFL first-rounders Mykel Williams and Jalon Walker after last season.
NIL
Buddie Defends Dykes as TCU Fans Fume Over 8–4 Season
TCU’s just-passed 8-4 regular season had many in the purple people masses as angry as a tourist who just paid $40 to park, and for many others as disappointed as when Junior brought home an F in civics.
Many have expressed themselves in much the same way of our old friend, the frontier prospector Gabby Johnson of “Blazing Saddles” fame: No sidewindin’, bushwackin’, hornswagglin’ cracker croaker is gonna rouin me bishen cutter!
TCU Athletic Director Mike Buddie gets it.
“I think there were 11 teams in our league this year whose fan bases wanted their coaches fired,” Buddie said on Friday morning at the FIFA World Cup Draw party at Billy Bob’s Texas, the world’s largest honky tonk. “That’s the culture that we live in. You can win [against a] ranked opponent, [next week against] ranked opponent, [a third straight win against a] ranked opponent, and then lose — they want you gone.
“It’s a new day and age.”
Like the mood of Paris in 1793 — cheers in the morning, pitchforks and the guillotine by dusk.
TCU finished in the middle of a congested Big 12 at 5-4. To put some perspective on its season, Texas finished 9-3. Of course, many UT fans think the Longhorns should win every game, too. No. 25 Missouri, like TCU, finished 8-4. So, too, did Tennessee and Iowa, two teams receiving votes in the AP poll. In the end, after 12 regular-season games, only two teams finished undefeated — Ohio State and Indiana. One of those teams will lose this weekend; they play each other.
North Carolina — guided by renowned football genius Bill Belichick — stumbled to 4–8, taking a season-opening black eye from TCU.
Just last year, Ohio State fans wanted coach Ryan Day on the nearest interstate out of town after the Buckeyes took the worst kind of a second loss of the season — to Michigan. That was on Nov. 30. By the end of January, they wanted to elect him governor after winning the national championship.
The Horned Frogs will learn their postseason bowl destination on Sunday.
Dykes has gone 35-17 over four seasons at TCU, including 13-2 and a berth in the College Football Playoff championship game in his first season. That campaign included a victory over No. 2 Michigan in the Fiesta Bowl CFP semifinals.
TCU slipped to 5-7 in 2023 but went 9-4 last year and could do the same in 2025 with one last victory.
“We need to be better,” Buddie said. “We’re committed to getting better. I’m excited because nobody realizes that more than Sonny Dykes.
“He’s committed to addressing some needs that I think we have and more than ever before, what I do and how we strategically fundraise and approach people financially has a direct impact on your football program. I think Texas Tech showed us all that if you can build the most talented roster and develop them, really good things happen.”
Texas Tech, which is playing in the Big 12 Championship Game on Saturday against BYU, spent, according to reports and speculation, as much as $28 million on its football roster this season. The Red Raiders are No. 4 in the most recent CFP rankings.
Spending that kind of money is the result of a completely transformed landscape in college football. Colleges can now spend as much as $20.5 million on payroll for athletes in its various programs. That mostly impacts football and men’s basketball — those sports that generate the most revenue, the “revenue sports.”
Before that, each Division I school had an adjacent collective designed to allow athletes to cash in on their name, image, and likeness. That quickly evolved — devolved? — into merely paying athletes by writing checks out of the collective’s pool. Now completely legal after a U.S. Supreme Court case permitting athletes to receive compensation beyond traditional scholarships. The collectives simply became the mechanism to funnel those payments.
Most, if not all, of the collectives have now been merged with universities’ traditional athletics fundraising arm. NIL endorsement deals are now supposed to be just exactly that — an athlete endorsing a product, for example. I’m not exactly sure how all that sorts out.
“The landscape has changed, but we still have a ton of advantages in facilities and where we’re located and historical success,” said Buddie, who added that TCU also is “thoughtful and strategic in how we employ people.”
“We’re not in the business of paying $50 million buyouts for people to go away. And when you believe you’ve got the right person who’s already proven that he can win in the College Football Playoff, it’s incumbent on me to provide him every resource that he needs to be successful.”
NIL
Penn State football AD Pat Kraft rips recruiting, NIL in audio leak
Updated Dec. 5, 2025, 5:27 p.m. ET
- Leaked audio allegedly captures Penn State athletic director Pat Kraft criticizing the program’s recruiting and NIL strategy.
- Kraft is heard taking shots at rival programs like Oregon, Ohio State, and Michigan in the profanity-laced recording.
- The athletic director also questioned the effectiveness of NIL spending under former head coach James Franklin.
Athletics director Pat Kraft ripped Penn State football recruiting and NIL procedures under former coach James Franklin in an alleged team meeting.
“We probably need to (expletive) change the way we recruit. Because Alabama ain’t around (expletive). Oregon? Have you all been to Oregon? Ain’t (expletive) going on, it’s a bunch of (expletive) weirdos,” Kraft can be heard saying in audio that became public.
Kraft’s profanity-laced discussion with players before the regular-season finale at Rutgers was part of a purported audio recording of a team meeting that was leaked this week to the Dead Air Sports podcast. Kraft’s passionate discourse touched on a wide-range of topics — from taking shots at Big Ten opponents and his own program’s recruiting, to interim head coach Terry Smith, how NIL is allocated and the future of the program.
The recording, which features unidentified players speaking, was edited and does not feature the entire meeting, according to Dead Air Sports.
Recording and leaking the meeting without proper consent could be a felony under Pennsylvania’s wiretap laws.
Penn State officials did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Kraft began his recruiting talk in the meeting by commenting on the 11 players in Penn State’s 2026 recruiting class who eventually flipped to Virginia Tech, where Franklin is now the head coach. The Lions, then, stunningly signed only two high school prospects during Wednesday’s early national signing day.
“All the guys that (were) on visits to Virginia Tech, they’re not even top-500 (ranked) kids that can help us win. You need help,” Kraft said, speaking to the players in the room. “You needed a wide receiver, but we couldn’t get a (expletive) dog to help open things up. Am I wrong? Would you have taken (Ohio State’s) Carnell Tate?
“Those are the things we have to get addressed if we are going to actually win a national championship, which is what we will do here. That’s what Ohio State, Michigan, as it pains me to (expletive) say, and Georgia, Bama and Oregon right now, although I think they’re frauds … think they’re not tough. That’s our edge, is the toughness.”

Kraft also made clear that he did not approve of Penn State’s NIL payment plan to players under Franklin — despite increased university investment.
“This is one of the highest-paid rosters in the country. … This roster that’s on the field right now, probably top four (in the nation). Now, how the money is spent is a different story. … it’s the strategy behind it that matters,” he said.
An unidentified player then described what believes is the NIL issue at Penn State: “The NIL with (Franklin) was kind of more like feed everyone and obviously pay the bigger guy. But I think with Terry (Smith), how he’s straight on with us … he’s going to pay who he needs to pay and not be a players’ coach and just pay everybody.”
Frank Bodani covers Penn State football for the York Daily Record and USA Today Network. Contact him at fbodani@ydr.com and follow him on X, formerly known as Twitter, @YDRPennState.
NIL
Wall Street Journal Article on NIL and Phillip Bell
Article is about Phillip Bells High School experience and being shopped to different schools and 7 x 7 teams. Really sad situation.
A few quotes:
“Bell’s mother, who abused drugs, shopped him from school to school, demanding up to $72,000 a year, according to court filings, public records and interviews with relatives and others who knew the family. He also joined a club team that paid thousands of dollars a weekend.’
On his visit to OSU: “The hotel room where Bell’s mother and stepfather were staying was “trashed,” leaving an OSU coach with a bill for broken furniture, his high-school coach later told relatives. A Buckeyes coach subsequently informed Bell’s mother that the team wanted her son, but the “entourage” wasn’t welcome in Columbus, the high-school coach said.
OSU declined to comment.
Before they left Ohio, Barnes’ blood sugar spiked to life-threatening levels, she suffered a heart attack and was hospitalized for several days, according to public records.”
Hoping that with support from OSU that he can break the cycle and achieve great things!
This link is behind a paywall: https://www.wsj.com/us-news/football-high-school-nil-phillip-bell-81270bdf?mod=hp_lead_pos7
Definitely worth a read – there is definitely a downside to the money flowing to these athletes. Kinda makes me wonder about the Legend Bey situation.
NIL
Georgia sues Missouri edge rusher Damon Wilson for nearly $400K over NIL contract he signed with Bulldogs
Georgia is attempting to get edge rusher Damon Wilson to pony up after his transfer to Missouri.
The school’s athletic association has filed a lawsuit against Wilson saying he owes $390,000 from the NIL contract he signed with the school’s collective in December 2024 ahead of Georgia’s College Football Playoff loss to Notre Dame. Wilson transferred after the 2024 season to Missouri and received one payment of $30,000.
Advertisement
Wilson, a junior, led Missouri with nine sacks and 9.5 tackles for loss this season. He had three sacks and 5.5 tackles for loss as a sophomore for the Bulldogs in 2024.
Georgia is claiming Wilson owes the balance of the base pay the contract stipulated he’d be paid via a liquidated damages claim. According to ESPN, Wilson’s deal with Classic City Collective was for $500,000 spread out over 14 monthly payments with two post-transfer portal bonuses of $40,000 and that he’d owe what was still set to be paid out to him if he left the team.
From ESPN:
“When the University of Georgia Athletic Association enters binding agreements with student-athletes, we honor our commitments and expect student-athletes to do the same,” athletics spokesperson Steven Drummond said in a statement to ESPN.
Georgia is not the first school to file a suit over NIL payments to a player who transferred. But the hard-line tactic is noteworthy, and may ultimately not work out in Georgia’s favor.
Advertisement
Schools typically do not ask coaches to pay out the balance of their contracts when leaving for another job. For example, Lane Kiffin did not have to pay Ole Miss what the school was scheduled to pay him over the rest of his deal with the school when he left for LSU. Instead, LSU paid Ole Miss $3 million for Kiffin to get out of his contract.
That situation happens all the time when coaches leave for new jobs. Their buyouts to get out of their contracts are far smaller than the buyouts schools owe when a coach is fired without cause.
And coaches are employees. Schools have long resisted that players be classified as employees and continue to do so even as the revenue-sharing era begins. The NCAA and its member schools have long clung to amateurism and that antiquated idea is why it took so long for players to get paid in the first place.
NIL
Georgia seeks $390K in NIL contract damages from Missouri football DE
Dec. 5, 2025, 3:22 p.m. CT
Georgia athletics is taking Missouri football defensive end Damon Wilson II to court in a novel, nearly first-of-its-kind case over an NIL contract dispute.
The news was first reported by ESPN’s Dan Wilson on Friday, Dec. 5. The Tribune confirmed the news through a university source and court documents filed in Georgia by the Bulldogs.
UGA is attempting to take Wilson into arbitration and is seeking $390,000 in liquidated damages from the star edge rusher, who transferred to the Tigers in January 2025, over what the university views as an unfulfilled contract in Athens. The lawsuit is not against the University of Missouri, only Wilson.
According to the ESPN report, Georgia is arguing that Wilson signed a contract — a common practice in the NIL era — with what was then UGA’s main NIL and marketing arm, Classic City Collective, in December 2024.
That collective has since shut down, as UGA has partnered with Learfield to negotiate and facilitate NIL deals in the revenue-sharing era.
The report, citing documents attached to UGA’s legal filings, show that Wilson signed a 14-month deal worth $500,000 with the Bulldogs. He was set to earn monthly payments of $30,000 through the end of the contract, as well as two $40,000 bonus payments.
Before announcing his intention to transfer in January, he reportedly was paid $30,000.
The contract states that if Wilson left the team or transferred, which he ended up doing by transferring to Mizzou, then he would owe the collective issuing the payments a lump sum equal to the amount remaining on his deal.
The bonus payments seemingly were not included, which brings that total to the $390,000 that Georgia is now seeking in court.
Wilson, per the report, was only paid a fraction of that sum, but the university is arguing that he owes the full amount in damages. It’s unclear why Georgia is arguing it is owed the full amount in liquidated damages.
The Tribune has reached out to a Georgia athletics spokesperson for comment. At the time of publishing, UGA had not responded to the request for a statement.
According to documents viewed by the Tribune through the Georgia courts records system, UGA filed an “application to compel arbitration” on Oct. 17 in the Clarke County Superior Court, which includes Athens and the University of Georgia. Wilson was served with a summons to appear in court, according to documents, on Nov. 19, three days before the Tigers faced Oklahoma.
A similar case occurred at Arkansas last spring, when quarterback Madden Iamaleava transferred out of Fayetteville after spring camp. It’s unclear whether or not that case has been resolved.
Wilson spent his freshman and sophomore seasons at Georgia. He transferred to Mizzou ahead of spring camp in 2025 and has emerged as one of the top pass rushers in the SEC.
Per Pro Football Focus, Wilson generated 49 pressures on opposing quarterbacks this season, which was the second-most in the SEC behind only Colin Simmons at Texas. He’s listed at 6 foot 4, 250 pounds and could declare for the 2026 NFL Draft, where he would likely be a Day 1 or 2 pick.

The lawsuit raises a contentious point.
By suing Wilson for allegedly not fulfilling the terms of his contract, the school could be treading close to arguing that Wilson was paid to play. That’s not how NIL deals currently work. The deals and their payments are typically for an athletes’ likeness for brand deals and marketing. Think of it as advertising money, not salaries.
There’s a reason that’s the case. By paying players for play, there’s an argument that they are university employees. University and athletic department leaders are widely against making that distinction, because it would disrupt the amateurism model in place for college athletics.
Wilson’s contract likely includes “liquidated damages” language, which are intended to stop players from transferring.
Missouri currently has multiple players on two-year contracts. Part of that is in the hope that they do not move on after one season.
If Georgia’s arbitration case against Wilson is successful, that would be a groundbreaking ruling in college athletics that could give more weight to liquidated damages clauses in athlete contracts.
-
Rec Sports2 weeks agoFirst Tee Winter Registration is open
-
Rec Sports1 week agoFargo girl, 13, dies after collapsing during school basketball game – Grand Forks Herald
-
Motorsports2 weeks agoCPG Brands Like Allegra Are Betting on F1 for the First Time
-
Sports2 weeks agoVolleyball Recaps – November 18
-
Motorsports2 weeks agoF1 Las Vegas: Verstappen win, Norris and Piastri DQ tighten 2025 title fight
-
Sports2 weeks agoTwo Pro Volleyball Leagues Serve Up Plans for Minnesota Teams
-
Sports2 weeks agoSycamores unveil 2026 track and field schedule
-
Sports1 week agoUtah State Announces 2025-26 Indoor Track & Field Schedule
-
Sports1 week agoTexas volleyball vs Kentucky game score: Live SEC tournament updates
-
NIL5 days agoBowl Projections: ESPN predicts 12-team College Football Playoff bracket, full bowl slate after Week 14





