Connect with us

NIL

Redrawing The NIL Playbook

Introduction The recent decision by U.S. District Judge Karen Marston inMLB Players Inc. v. DraftKings and Bet3651 represents a pivotal development in the legal landscape surrounding name, image, and likeness (NIL) rights. The ruling explores critical intersections between publicity rights, commercial speech, First Amendment protections, and the legal boundaries of “news reporting.” The implications extend […]

Published

on

Redrawing The NIL Playbook

Introduction

The recent decision by U.S. District Judge Karen Marston
inMLB Players Inc. v. DraftKings and Bet3651 represents a pivotal development
in the legal landscape surrounding name, image, and likeness (NIL)
rights. The ruling explores critical intersections between
publicity rights, commercial speech, First Amendment protections,
and the legal boundaries of “news reporting.” The
implications extend far beyond baseball, potentially affecting
companies using athlete or celebrity NIL in commercial marketing
across sports betting, digital advertising, and beyond.

Case Background

MLB Players Inc. (MLBPI), the group licensing subsidiary of the
Major League Baseball Players Association, brought this action
against DraftKings and Bet365, alleging unauthorized commercial use
of player NIL in promotional campaigns. The complaint specifically
cited examples where players’ images—including Yankees
star Aaron Judge—were used in digital and social media
promotions without proper authorization or compensation.2

Judge Marston’s ruling denied the defendants’ motion to
dismiss claims related to right of publicity violations,
misappropriation and unjust enrichment. Only one misappropriation
claim was dismissed as duplicative.3 The case now advances to
discovery, where the courts will examine the factual context and
intent behind the disputed content.

Defining the “News Reporting”
Defense

A central question in this case concerns the scope of the
“news reporting” defense under Pennsylvania law.4 This exemption typically allows
use of an individual’s identity without consent when it appears
in legitimate news reporting on matters of public interest.

Judge Marston’s ruling made the following critical
distinctions:

  1. Content about newsworthy topics differs legally from
    content that constitutes actual news reporting;
  2. Athlete identities cannot be used in commercial promotions
    under the guise of “news reporting”—even when
    discussing newsworthy sporting events; and
  3. Pennsylvania applies a narrower interpretation of this
    exemption than some other jurisdictions.5

The court citedAbdul-Jabbar v. General Motors
Corp.
(1996)6, where the Ninth Circuit found
that even content comprised of factually accurate information about
an athlete’s accomplishments loses protection from right of
publicity claims when used primarily for commercial
advertising.The decisive factor is not the truthfulness of
the content, but whether the use serves a commercial
purpose.

The Clear Line: Advertising vs. Journalism

The ruling provided concrete examples illustrating impermissible
commercial use. In one instance, a Bet365 social media post
featured Aaron Judge alongside betting odds about MLB teams winning
100+ games. Critically, the post made no substantive reference to
Judge’s performance or provided any meaningful
context—his image simply served to attract attention to the
sportsbook’s offerings.7

Judge Marston emphasized that content merely resembling
editorial or journalistic material, while actually serving an
advertising function, cannot claim news exemptions under right of
publicity statutes. This creates a clear standard: Content
adopting the look and feel of news coverage while fundamentally
promoting a product or service remains subject to right of
publicity laws and a higher standard for legal clearance than a use
of the same content for news or entertainment
purposes.

First Amendment Arguments: Limited Protection for
Commercial Use

The defendants’ First Amendment arguments referenced cases
involving expressive works such as video games and artistic
renderings.8 However, Judge Marston
distinguished those precedents, noting they involved transformed or
creatively interpreted athlete images—unlike the
straightforward use of player photos in this case.

The court found limited grounds for strong First Amendment
protection at this stage because the promotional content relied on
direct, unaltered use of athlete likenesses primarily for
commercial gain. While deferring a complete First Amendment
analysis until further factual development, the ruling signals that
purely commercial uses face an uphill battle under free speech
protections.9

Strategic Implications for Industry
Stakeholders

This ruling carries significant implications for how NIL is used
across industries—particularly in digital marketing,
advertising, sports, betting, and branded content. When NIL is used
for commercial promotion rather than legitimate reporting,
organizations face potential liability without proper
licensing.

Key Action Items:

  • Conduct content audits to identify where
    athlete or celebrity NIL appears in marketing materials.
  • Implement more rigorous legal clearances
    processes for NIL-related promotions.
  • Review existing licensing agreements to ensure
    they cover intended uses.
  • Develop clear internal guidelines
    distinguishing between news reporting and promotional content.
  • Consider jurisdictional differences in right
    of publicity laws when planning national campaigns.

The Evolving NIL Landscape

As NIL continues to grow in commercial value, legal efforts to
protect these rights are intensifying. Athletes, celebrities, and
their representatives are becoming more assertive in controlling
NIL usage—with courts increasingly supporting their
position.

Several states are enacting or revising right of publicity laws,
expanding individual NIL protections and increasing potential
liabilities for unauthorized commercial use. This state-by-state
evolution has amplified calls for uniform federal NIL
legislation—potentially modeled after copyright
protections—to prevent a fragmented legal landscape that
encourages forum shopping and inconsistent outcomes.

Conclusion

The MLB Players Inc. ruling marks a significant shift
in NIL jurisprudence that affects brands, platforms, advertisers,
and content creators across industries. The distinction between
legitimate news reporting and commercial promotion is becoming more
defined—and legally consequential.

In an environment where “earned media” and
“sponsored content” demand different legal approaches,
organizations must adapt their NIL practices to this evolving
landscape. Those who implement comprehensive compliance strategies
will be best positioned to avoid liability while effectively
leveraging NIL in their marketing efforts.

Footnotes

1. MLB Players, Inc. v. DraftKings, Inc., No.
24-4884-KSM, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 47600 (E.D. Pa. Mar. 14,
2025).

2. Complaint, MLB Players Inc. v. DraftKings,
¶¶ 23–36.

3. Memorandum Opinion by Judge Karen Marston,
February 2025, at 12–14.

4. 42 Pa. Cons. Stat. §
8316(e)(2)(ii).

5. Id., see also Judge Marston’s analysis
at p. 10.

6. Abdul-Jabbar v. General Motors Corp., 85
F.3d 407 (9th Cir. 1996).

7. Judge Marston Opinion, at
16–17.

8. Brown v. Entertainment Merchants Ass’n,
564 U.S. 786 (2011); ETW Corp. v. Jireh Publ’g, Inc., 332 F.3d
915 (6th Cir. 2003).

9. Judge Marston Opinion, at 21.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general
guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought
about your specific circumstances.

NIL

Mark Ingram describes emotions of making Alabama Sports Hall of Fame

Mark Ingram was formally inducted into the Alabama Sports Hall of Fame earlier this month as the headliner in the Class of 2025. Ingram, the University of Alabama’s original Heisman Trophy winner in 2009, received a medal and memorial plaque with his portrait on it during the 57th Annual Induction Banquet and Ceremony on May […]

Published

on


Mark Ingram was formally inducted into the Alabama Sports Hall of Fame earlier this month as the headliner in the Class of 2025. Ingram, the University of Alabama’s original Heisman Trophy winner in 2009, received a medal and memorial plaque with his portrait on it during the 57th Annual Induction Banquet and Ceremony on May 3 from the Sheraton Birmingham Hotel.

Ingram opened up about the honor during this week’s episode of The Triple Option podcast with host Rob Stone and former Florida and Ohio State coach Urban Meyer.

“What an amazing event. Shoutout to the Alabama Sports Hall of Fame. It was an amazing event,” Ingram said. “I didn’t know what I was expecting going into it, but what a first-class event. Hundreds of people at the banquet. Everyone was super welcoming. When I tell you, if you want to be apart of a Hall of Fame, this is one you want to be apart of.”

Ingram then rattled off a list of other legendary Alabama Sports Hall of Fame recipients, including boxing legend Joe Louis, iconic Alabama football coaches Paul “Bear” Bryant and Nick Saban, transformative Olympic track and field stars Jesse Owens and Carl Lewis, Atlanta Braves home run king Hank Aaron, multi-sport superstar and Auburn star Bo Jackson, NBA legend and Auburn alum Charles Barkley, former Auburn football coach John Heisman, former FSU coach Bobby Bowden, Clemson head coach and Alabama alum Dabo Swinney, as well as international soccer superstar Mia Hamm, just to name a few.

Suffice it to say, that’s some elite company and Ingram is clearly proud of the honor. In three seasons in Tuscaloosa, Ingram rushed for 3,261 yards and 70 touchdowns between 2008-10.

Along with winning Alabama’s first-ever Heisman Trophy and a BCS national championship in 2009, Ingram rushed for more than 8,000 yards and 65 touchdowns over 12 NFL seasons, the first eight with the New Orleans Saints, before retiring following the 2022 season. Ingram has since become a sports media figure as a member of FOX Sports’ Big Noon Kickoff show.

Mark Ingram predicts Alabama to go over projected win total in 2025

In his first season leading the Alabama Crimson Tide, head coach Kalen DeBoer led the team to a 9-4 record, including their bowl loss. That left them short of making the College Football Playoff and looking to quickly improve going in Year Two.

Now, amid spring practice, Alabama is looking at a projected win total of 9.5 wins. That’s a number that former Alabama running back Mark Ingram fully expects his former team to go over in 2025.

“You talk about that at Florida State to pop off, week one,” Mark Ingram said. “We talked about the scheduling. We talked about the potential of scheduling these types of games to start the year and how it could really affect you. You lose that game, and you’re behind the eight-ball. Are you gonna get punished for it? Yes, you will. We saw that strength of schedule kind of didn’t get taken into place last year. So, that to start off the season is going to be a big test. At Florida State, we know the season they had. They’re gonna want to bounce back. Then you’ve got ULM. Then you’ve got Wisconsin… I’m going 3-0.”

After those three non-conference games to start the season, Ingram turned his attention to conference play. Last season, Alabama went 5-3 in SEC play and will be played against the same eight schools from last season in conference play. They’re just reversing the location where games are played. Still, Ingram is expecting an improved effort there.

“Then you’ve got at Georgia. That’s obviously going to be a dog fight,” Ingram said. “Then you go Vandy, dub. Missouri, dub. Tennessee, revenge game, dub. South Carolina, at South Carolina, dub. LSU, dub. Oklahoma, revenge game again, dub. Eastern Illinois, dub. There’s your 10.5 there. Auburn in the Iron Bowl, dub. That’s an 11-piece. That’s an 11-piece family meal.”

— On3’s Dan Morrison contributed to this report.



Link

Continue Reading

NIL

Can Trump and Saban Fix NIL?

Alabama’s former Head Coach and College Gameday host Nick Saban recently met with President Donald Trump regarding a mainstream issue with college football – NIL. College football is in chaos after the supreme court allowed players to get paid, leading to much more player movement in the portal and financial “deals.” Many football fans want […]

Published

on

Can Trump and Saban Fix NIL?

Alabama’s former Head Coach and College Gameday host Nick Saban recently met with President Donald Trump regarding a mainstream issue with college football – NIL. College football is in chaos after the supreme court allowed players to get paid, leading to much more player movement in the portal and financial “deals.” Many football fans want Trump to step in and set things straight, however many experts warn his involvement could make things a lot more complicated.

A thing to worry about is if Trump tries to step in and tries to fix things, he could potentially cause more confusion and legal problems. Many people worry that if Trump steps in, his new laws could conflict with existing laws and agreements, making it all more complicated rather than fixing it. This could lead to more confusion and cause even more chaos in college football. 

When Trump and Saban met, there wasn’t a clear solution proposed, but Saban clearly stated his concern with NIL and how it’s damaging the sport. Their conversation more covered the need for a change rather than offering a specific fix. Which is a step in the right direction.


“Everyone’s got mixed opinions about NIL because depending on the team they like, it helps them a lot or it hurts them a lot. Personally, I don’t like it. Big-name teams like Ohio State and Texas can sort of monopolize recruiting and take away the chances small market teams have of competing. I think the best way to regulate NIL is to put a cap on each team. That way, the big name teams don’t have unlimited money to throw at top recruits,” senior Matthew Chabraja said.

“NIL makes it really hard for the small schools to compete. If they get a good player and develop him, he will leave for a big school to get money,” Michael Bousis said.

I couldn’t agree more with what they’re saying. All NIL is doing is it’s giving the big market teams a huge advantage and giving the small market teams no chance. The sport is losing its competitive balance. College football used to be about heart and loyalty, now it’s just about money. In 2021, 786 players entered the portal. This year, there were over 3,000, making it the most active portal in college football history. Players don’t care about where they play and where they graduate from now, all they care about is how much money they can make. It’s taking away what made college football so amazing and different from the NFL. 

While the meeting with Trump and Saban showed clear concern over the NIL’s impact on college football, it’s clear there is no easy fix. While it’s important for players to earn what they deserve, this system undoubtedly seems to favor the richest programs and leave the smaller programs behind. Until fair guidelines are put in place, the chaos will most likely continue. Whether or not Trump and Saban can come up with a solution, one thing is clear – college football needs a solution.  

Continue Reading

NIL

Top 100 Players in College Football for the 2025 Season

College football season is getting closer, and there are officially 100 days left until the 2025 campaign gets underway. To celebrate, On3’s Clark Brooks broke down the Top 100 Players in College Football for the 2025 season. He began by providing an overview of what you can expect to see by position in terms of […]

Published

on


College football season is getting closer, and there are officially 100 days left until the 2025 campaign gets underway. To celebrate, On3’s Clark Brooks broke down the Top 100 Players in College Football for the 2025 season.

He began by providing an overview of what you can expect to see by position in terms of the breakdown. It’s quite useful stuff.

“One of the first things that jump out for this crop is the number of talented QBs,” Brooks said. “This time last year, only 3 signal callers earned the honor of making our top25. Flash forward to today, and you’ll see 7. Concisely, there are less Offensive Executives and more dudes with bankable next-level traits, which is great for college football. All in all, a dozen passers crack the top100 – the third most of any position. 

“We are big believers in last year’s historic freshmen class. Of our top7 most impact players, 5 are rising sophomores, and a handful of others made the cut. At this stage, we feel very comfortable in their collective ability to dominate their positions and brighten their stars not only this year but next as well. 

“For lovers of quality line play, our list should generate plenty of smiles. Scores of known (and successful) commodities exist upfront on both sides of the ball as linemen compose 45% of today’s top100 ranker. Of course, some of that is due to other positions being riddled with uncertainty. That said, this year’s collection of talented big boys is too much to ignore. Offensive Tackle is particularly deep and well-represented with 16 slots, the most of any position.”

With 100 days left until kickoff, here’s the full breakdown of the Top 100 players in college football this coming year.

Jeremiah Smith-Ohio State-Ohio State football-Buckeyes
(© Adam Cairns/Columbus Dispatch / USA TODAY NETWORK via Imagn Images)

Clark Brooks: “No need to overthink this one. Smith was spectacular as a freshman and has all the makings of a future star. He has the size (6’3, 215), the speed (former Florida state champion in the 110 and 400 meter hurdles), and skill (did you not watch any college football last year?) to be the next phenom at the position and rule the sport for the next two years.

“While his counting stats speak for themselves, he also kicked ass in a very efficient manner. Half of his targets last year either moved the chains or resulted in points. Plus, no returning P4 receiver boasts a higher yards/route run (3.13).” 

Brooks: “An impact player in every sense of the word, Stewart has a knack for causing chaos and demoralizing opposing offensive linemen. At 6’6, 250 – he’s the only returning defensive lineman to sit inside the top4 in both havoc plays (62) and PFF pass rush grade (91.4).

“Freakish vibes. And, the rising sophomore is just getting started.”

Caleb Downs-Ohio State-Ohio State football-Buckeyes
(© Adam Cairns/Columbus Dispatch / USA TODAY NETWORK via Imagn Images)

Brooks: “Safety ordinarily isn’t considered the most impactful position. So seeing one inside the top3 in this list should scream how talented Downs is. He lines up all over – at centerfield, in the box, on the flank or nickel – wherever his team needs him.

“Fittingly, Downs can lock receivers down one-on-one, plug run lanes, and be a general nuisance to offensive play callers on any given snap. Moreover, each of the last two years – playing for two of college football’s biggest brands – he finished among PFF’s top10 highest-graded safeties.”

Colin Simmons
Colin Simmons (Will Gallagher/Inside Texas)

Brooks: “Like fellow sensational sophomore Dylan Stewart, Simmons is tenacious, active, and quite good at disrupting offenses. If logging 9 sacks wasn’t enough, his 17.6% Impact Rate – or percentage of snaps that result in a havoc play or defensive stop) is the best figure of any returning P4 defender.

“To do that as a first-year in the Land Where It Just Means More is special stuff.”

Sam Leavitt-Arizona State
(© Brett Davis-Imagn Images)

Brooks: “We at On3 are higher on him than the consensus, but he just delivers value all over. In my annual QB study, Leavitt was my favorite player to chart. He is a potent passer with lethal precision, minimizes mistakes masterfully, and displays nice feats of athleticism.

“Charles Powers comp’d him “Bo Nix-plus” recently (which might sound like a slight but Nix did end up figuring it out and becoming a first rounder) but I think he might have the potential to reach another echelon with his arm talent. Speaking of, his 59.7% Depth Adjusted Accuracy would have only trailed Cam Ward’s clip in last year’s QB Study.”

Alabama WR Ryan Williams
Alabama WR Ryan Williams (Butch Dill / USA TODAY Sports)

Brooks: “Williams is one of the most electric pass catchers around and should be the primary engine for Alabama’s offense. As a 17-year-old, he was the only SECer with at least 28 receptions to post a +10.0 yards/target and +9.0 yards after catch average.

“Even with the extra attention he’s bound to get from opponents, there’s a strong expectation that he will continue to amaze and provide game-altering splash plays for the Crimson Tide.”

Notre Dame cornerback Leonard Moore freshman All-American
(Mike Miller/Blue & Gold)

Brooks: “Moore is a stud. He didn’t back down from any challenges last year and emerged as one of the position’s best players despite being a freshman – a noticeable trend on this list.

“Playing a high percentage of man coverage (61%), he was 1/23 high volume corners last year to allow a sub-5.2 yards/target and 0.75 yards/coverage snap. Plus, the stingy 6’2 Golden Domer sports the 3rd-best PFF coverage grade (86.5) among returners ahead of this fall.”

south carolina gamecocks quarterback lanorris sellers
(Katie Dugan/GamecockCentral).

Brooks: “Sellers puts the spec.. Umm rec spec .. into spectacular. Few QBs are blessed with physical tools like his. And unlike some of these other aliens of that ilk, he has to date shown to be a prudent, accurate passer that avoids biffs and tossing the ball into harm’s way.

“To that point, he was the only SEC high volume starter last fall to finish inside the conference’s top2 in both Depth Adjusted Accuracy and Interceptable%. He is capable of scoring on any play with his arm or his legs – both in and out of structure. Fumbles are something to monitor, but his upside is premium.”

Anthony Hill
Anthony Hill (Will Gallagher/Inside Texas)

Brooks: “Hill is a brawny, aggressive force in the middle of the Longhorns’ defense. His meaty 6’3, 235 lb frame packs a pretty punch; and he’s a handful when he generates positive inertia.

“His steady presence has netted 77 stops, 10 sacks, and 5 forced fumbles the last couple of seasons.”

Booger McFarland and Dan Orlovsky discussed Texas benching Quinn Ewers for Arch Manning vs. Georgia.
Andrew Dieb-Imagn Images

Brooks: “You might have heard about this kid. Well like many, we at On3 expect big things out of Manning 3.0. In previous years, labeling a Sarkisian QB as a Checkdown Charlie or Offensive Executive would be a given. But in this case, it would be downright reprehensible.

“Like his uncles, he has premier passing abilities. He can layer throws, hit targets all over the yard, and stay in attack mode from the pocket with excellent balance, timing, and anticipation. Like his grandpa, he has noticeable twitch and burst that do him well outside of structure and as a designed rusher. Yes, Manning ought to benefit from his environment. But he’s also talented enough to elevate Texas to planes it hasn’t been in a generation.”

Notre Dame running back Jeremiyah Love
(Chad Weaver, Blue & Gold)

Brooks: “Love is a big play waiting to happen. He ripped off a breakaway in half of Notre Dame’s games. His 7.1 yards/touch was top30-worthy and only 7 backs donned a better EPA/attempt.

“But while those highlights are fun, I am enamored with his hardnosed rushing style. Last year, Love was 1/5 RBs to rock a +4.3 YAC average and +38% Missed Tackle Forced Rate according to PFF.”

Florida QB DJ Lagway
(Matt Pendleton-Imagn Images)

Brooks: “Lagway oozes juice. He was the only P4 QB to sport a double-digit PFF Big Time Throw%. He led the SEC in Splash Pass% (+35). And he finished with college football’s 2nd-best yards/dropback clip…as a freshman.

“Granted, the Samford game considerably boosted his bottom line. But even with that matchup omitted from his profile, both his 8.7 Y/A and 15.6% Explosive Pass% (+20) were top of the crop in my off-season QB study. Florida might be set up to fail due to another brutal schedule. But Lagway’s haymakers ought to give the Gators a fighter’s chance any given Saturday.”

Peter Woods (Ken Ruinard-USA TODAY Sports)

Brooks: “Woods is an excellent matchup dictator for Clemson’s formidable defensive front. He has experience lining up everywhere from a nose-shade to flanking a TE, with standout returns.

“Among high-volume DTs, he’s the only returner ahead of this fall inside the top15 in Impact, Havoc, and Stop Rates. And for good measure, the versatile Woods has the 6th-best Pass Rush Win Rate against true sets per PFF.”

LSU
Mandatory Credit: Stephen Lew-Imagn Images

Brooks: “I really like what Nuss brings to the table. Of course he had a shot to be a first-rounder in this year’s draft, but he should squarely be in the QB1 discussion moving forward. His heat-seeking arm is often what makes folks rubberneck his way. But in my opinion, his best trait is his feet.

“Nuss consistently is able to quick step and reset vs pressure and dance all thru the pocket avoiding takedowns – a necessity in this day and day no matter what style of quarterback you are. And from where I sit, it didn’t hurt his case that he also finished above the group average in my off-season QB study in Explosive Pass%, Interceptable%, and Accuracy% beyond 10 yards downfield.”

Alabama DL LT Overton vs. USF (courtesy UA Athletics)
Alabama DL LT Overton vs. USF (courtesy UA Athletics)

Brooks: “Coming off a breakout season, Overton is starting to live up to his 5-star pedigree. Beefy and strong, he’s well-suited to blow up run concepts and control his gap.

“But he’s much more than a space eater. Overton snatched 66 impact plays and has a top20 True Pass Set Win Rate among returning edges.”

Spencer Fano
Courtesy of Utah athletics

Brooks: “The OT1 debate in college football is wide open. There’s even an opinion Fano isn’t even the best tackle on his own team. But for right now, this hoss is our guy to headline the group.

“Fano is a certified bulldozer in the trenches and an undeniably visibly-pleasing run blocker. Plus, the rising junior is now an asset when Utah drops back. He disallowed pressure on 96.9% of his pass sets last year – a mark only bested by 6 returning P4 tackles.”

Tennessee cornerback Jermod McCoy. Credit: Kevin Jairaj-Imagn Images
Credit: Kevin Jairaj-Imagn Images

Brooks: “McCoy blossomed during his sophomore season. He’s fluid and fast with pretty good results shielding targets.

“His 11 overall forced incompletions are the most of any returning SEC DB. Specializing as a zone cover corner, only two returning CBs top his 87.5 PFF grade spot dropping.”

TJ Parker-Clemson
(Ken Ruinard-USA TODAY Sports)

Brooks: “It wouldn’t shock me in the slightest if Parker is a top10 pick next April. Simply, he just produces.

“Including his gaudy 12 sacks, 7 TFLs and 5 forced fumbles, his 93 impact plays were the 8th-most among defenders last year. And among edges, he’s the only returner to rank top5 in both stops and havoc plays by volume.”

Jordyn Tyson
© Scott Sewell-Imagn Images

Brooks: “Tyson is a bonafide playmaker. In the five games before his injury, he averaged roughly 9 catches for 124 per contest while totaling 6 tuddies. But, he wasn’t just a target vacuum compiling stats.

“Tyson was resoundingly economical with his opportunities. Only Jeremiah Smith tops his 3.04 yards/route run amongst returning P4 pass catchers. Assuming he picks up where he left off, Leavitt’s favorite target should be one of the most prolific receivers in college football this fall.”

Rueben Bain WF
Rueben Bain (Neil Gershman-Zooba Images)

Brooks: “When healthy, Bain is a relentless ball of energy with a red-hot motor. Injury prevented him from leveling up during his sophomore campaign. But despite that momentary setback, his upside remains high.

“Even with last year’s “dip”, Bain topped positional averages across the board regarding Impact, Havoc, and Stop Rates. And over the last two years, he’s won a quarter of his pass rushes versus true pass sets.” 

smu-drops-behind-alabama-ap-poll-released-after-conference-championships
Mandatory Credit: Jim Dedmon-Imagn Images

Brooks: “Terrell has a good argument to be considered college football’s most well-rounded cornerback. Solid in both zone and man, he was consistently reliable preventing yardage.

“After all, he was one of the more active ball hawks last fall tallying 12 defended passes. And behind 19 stops, no returner at the position logged more total impact plays than his 39.”

Drew Allar, Penn State - © Jordan Prather-Imagn Images
Drew Allar, Penn State – © Jordan Prather-Imagn Images

Brooks: “He’s yet to put it all together and be a consistent downfield thrower, but Allar has the ingredients to be a very impactful QB this season; especially after how Penn State invested in upgrading its pass catchers. He is a big passer with a sturdy, durable frame built to do damage from the pocket.

“With a compact release, his downfield offerings hardly require any strain and he can deliver fastballs even without a firm foundation. Plus, he’s shown to be a trusty decision maker that avoids football boo boos. He has a very deliberate style of moving and doesn’t win many footraces. That said, defenders can bounce right off of him; and when he can build up momentum, the ante gets upped.”

Brooks: “Most nosetackles strive to occupy space and be glorified Frisian horses in the middle of the line. But “The Godfather’s” approach to the game aims to provide value in other ways; namely as a twitchy pass rusher and reliable run game stopper.

“Over the last three seasons he’s accumulated over 60 pressures and defensive stops. Though a health scare affected his off-season last summer, many are expecting him to once again appear on Bruce Feldman’s Freak List due to his weight room prowess.”

Penn State cornerback AJ Harris
(Credit: Steve Manuel | Blue White Illustrated)

Brooks: “The former consensus top100 recruit and top10 cornerback of the 2023 class is one of the better shadow DBs ahead of this fall. He might not always strive to goad passers into risky throws or yearn to get his jersey dirty.

“But Harris doesn’t mind if his name gets called much – as long as he’s erasing his assignment. And it certainly helps his case knowing he is 1/4 returning corners with a +75.0 PFF coverage grade in both man and zone.”

Georgia QB Carson Beck at SEC Media Days
© Brett Patzke-USA TODAY Sports

Brooks: “This time last year, Beck was the consensus QB1 with hardly any blemishes on his passing profile. Obviously, things changed and Beck’s 2024 football season didn’t go as planned. His general accuracy soured, he logged more interceptables, he continued to stink when forced to pass off his mark, and suffered a surgery-requiring injury on his throwing arm. Yet, I remain optimistic he can regain his old form as one of the game’s soundest distributors within structure.

“Not only did he remain a standout midrange passer – one of his better selling points ahead of last season – but he logged my QB study’s lowest Uncatchable Pass Rate. Plus, he probably won’t suffer from the same level of backbreaking butterfingers for the 2nd-straight year. Not only were Beck’s 665 “drop yards” the most in the SEC by 130, it was the highest total I have charted within the conference since 2018. Practically a sixth of his throws +10 yards past the line of scrimmage were dropped.”

Keldric Fualk (Photo by Auburn Athletics)
Keldric Fualk (Photo by Auburn Athletics)
  1. EDGE Keldric Faulk, Auburn
  2. EDGE Dani Dennis-Sutton, Penn State
  3. OT Caleb Tiernan, Northwestern
  4. iOL Jake Slaughter, Florida
  5. OT Kadyn Proctor, Alabama
  6. S Jalon Kilgore, South Carolina
  7. OT Francis Mauigoa, Miami
  8. QB Cade Klubnik, Clemson
  9. RB Nicholas Singleton, Penn State
  10. CB D’Angelo Ponds, Indiana
  11. WR Cam Coleman, Auburn
  12. LB Whit Weeks, LSU
  13. EDGE Mikail Kamara, Indiana
  14. S Rod Moore, Michigan
  15. LB Deontae Lawson, Alabama
  16. iOL Parker Brailsford, Alabama
  17. WR Makai Lemon, USC
  18. CB Malik Muhammad, Texas
  19. RB Isaac Brown, Louisville
  20. WR Ryan Wingo, Texas
  21. LB Austin Romaine, Kansas State
  22. WR Elijah Sarratt, Indiana
  23. WR Carnell Tate, Ohio State
  24. EDGE Cashius Howell, Texas A&M
  25. EDGE Derrick Moore, Michigan
Duke Blue Devils quarterback Maalik Murphy (6) attempts to run the ball to the end zone but is tacked by Florida State Seminoles defensive lineman Darrell Jackson Jr. (6) during the first half of the game at Wallace Wade Stadium. (Jaylynn Nash-Imagn Images)
(Jaylynn Nash-Imagn Images)
  1. iOL Ar’Maj Reed-Adams, Texas A&M
  2. INT Darrell Jackson Jr., Florida State
  3. INT Caleb Banks, Florida
  4. OT Brian Parker II, Duke
  5. OT Carter Smith, Indiana
  6. S Kamari Ramsey, USC
  7. iOL Logan Jones, Iowa
  8. OT Trey Zuhn III, Texas A&M
  9. RB Jonah Coleman, Washington
  10. iOL Iapani Laloulu, Oregon
  11. OT Blake Miller, Clemson
  12. EDGE David Bailey, Texas Tech
  13. S Terry Moore, Duke
  14. TE Justin Joly, NC State
  15. QB John Mateer, Oklahoma
  16. RB Makhi Hughes, Oregon
  17. OT Gennings Dunker, Iowa
  18. CB Xavier Scott, Illinois
  19. OT Austin Barber, Florida
  20. OT Isaiah World, Oregon
  21. S Dillon Thieneman, Oregon
  22. S Koi Perich, Minnesota
  23. WR Evan Stewart, Oregon
  24. EDGE R Mason Thomas, Oklahoma
  25. EDGE Tyreak Sapp, Florida
Eric Singleton Jr. (Photo by Auburn Athletics)
Eric Singleton Jr. (Photo by Auburn Athletics)
  1. CB Jontez Williams, Iowa State
  2. WR Eric Singleton Jr., Auburn
  3. LB Kyle Louis, Pittsburgh
  4. LB Rasheem Biles, Pittsburgh
  5. INT Gracen Halton, Oklahoma
  6. WR Eugene Wilson III, Florida
  7. INT Aaron Graves, Iowa
  8. QB Nico Iamaleava, UCLA
  9. iOL Drew Evans, Indiana
  10. INT Rayshaun Benny, Michigan
  11. OT Kage Casey, Boise State
  12. EDGE Suntarine Perkins, Ole Miss
  13. QB Josh Hoover, TCU
  14. QB Taylen Green, Arkansas
  15. OT Trevor Goosby, Texas
  16. LB CJ Allen, Georgia
  17. iOL Cayden Green, Missouri
  18. S Michael Taaffe, Texas
  19. OT Caleb Lomu, Utah
  20. OT Aamil Wagner, Notre Dame
  21. INT Christen Miller, Georgia
  22. OT Jordan Seaton, Colorado
  23. RB Darius Taylor, Minnesota
  24. RB Jahiem White, West Virginia
  25. RB Kaytron Allen, Penn State



Link

Continue Reading

NIL

NCAA president opens the door for Trump to weigh in on NIL rules

The head of the National Collegiate Athletic Association is welcoming the possibility of Donald Trump and the executive branch weighing in on the name, image and likeness rules for college athletes. Last week, I wrote about former college football coach Nick Saban’s meeting with Trump, in which he’s said to have urged Trump to take […]

Published

on

NCAA president opens the door for Trump to weigh in on NIL rules

The head of the National Collegiate Athletic Association is welcoming the possibility of Donald Trump and the executive branch weighing in on the name, image and likeness rules for college athletes.

Last week, I wrote about former college football coach Nick Saban’s meeting with Trump, in which he’s said to have urged Trump to take executive action to control the system that currently allows college athletes to earn money from their name, image and likeness (NIL). Saban has previously suggested today’s college athletes are too entitled, and he’s found an ally in Republican Sen. Tommy Tuberville of Alabama, who’s also a former college football coach who has complained about the current system. It’s a pairing that raises doubts that any solution they propose will favor players rather than the colleges that rely on their labor. More recent news reports indicate that Trump is considering naming Saban and a billionaire Texas Tech booster to a commission on college athletics that could include NIL rules.

During a gathering on Monday, NCAA President Charlie Baker expressed openness to government involvement. According to The News & Observer of Raleigh, N.C.:

‘I think the fact that there’s an interest on the executive side on this, I think it speaks to the fact that everybody is paying a lot of attention right now to what’s going on in college sports,’ said Baker, a former Republican governor of Massachusetts. ‘There is a lot going on, that’s not all bad, and I’m up for anything that helps us get somewhere.’

On whether Trump or his commission’s involvement would bring about the NIL legislation that some NCAA officials have been seeking for years, Baker said, “I don’t have a crystal ball on that one, I don’t know.” He added, “We do need some help at some point to create some clarity out of some of these issues in Washington. Creating clarity one lawsuit at a time is just a really bad way to try to move forward.”

So it looks like the NCAA is taking a different approach to Trump’s potential meddling in their institution. Where some organizations, like a handful of law firms, have resisted Trump’s edicts that attempt to dictate how they operate, the NCAA is “up for anything.”

This article was originally published on MSNBC.com

Continue Reading

NIL

Nate Oats, Alabama hosting top Transfer Portal target on visit this weekend

Nate Oats and Alabama basketball are looking to fill the remaining two open roster spots for the 2025-26 season. The team officially received clarity on Labaron Philon this week, with the star guard opting to remain in the NBA Draft instead of returning for his sophomore season in Tuscaloosa. With several quality options remaining in […]

Published

on

Nate Oats, Alabama hosting top Transfer Portal target on visit this weekend

Nate Oats and Alabama basketball are looking to fill the remaining two open roster spots for the 2025-26 season. The team officially received clarity on Labaron Philon this week, with the star guard opting to remain in the NBA Draft instead of returning for his sophomore season in Tuscaloosa.

With several quality options remaining in the Transfer Portal, Oats and the Crimson Tide have zeroed in on one of the best players remaining. USC transfer guard Desmond Claude is expected to be in Tuscaloosa on Sunday to visit Alabama, per On3’s Joe Tipton.

According to Busting Brackets, Claude is the No. 5 overall player remaining in the Transfer Portal.

Claude is a 6-foot-6 combo guard who is capable of playing on or off the ball. He would be another big body at guard, something that has been an obvious priority for the Crimson Tide this offseason.

Claude has played three seasons of college basketball and will be entering his final year of eligibility. He spent his first two seasons at Xavier before transferring to USC last season. For the Trojans, Claude averaged 15.8 points, 3.5 rebounds, and 4.2 assists per game. Claude was Top 15 in both points and assists in the Big Ten.

Claude is a career 27.1% shooter from three, which could make him a bit of an odd fit in Oats’ system. However, Claude shot a career-high 30.7% for the Trojans last year.

Oats recently commented that this could be the best shooting team he has put together at Alabama. With three-point shooters everywhere else, taking a swing on a playmaking guard who can get to the rim and distribute the ball is a worthwhile gamble.

Claude converted 55.7% of his attempts at the rim and hit 47.7% from mid-range.

Desmond Claude’s game is similar to a former Alabama guard

Claude’s all-around game is similar to former Alabama guard Aaron Estrada. Estrada wasn’t a great shooter – he hit 31.3% of his threes with the Crimson Tide – but he was still a productive player on both ends of the court and a major piece of a Final Four team.

The big difference between the two is that Claude is listed as three inches taller than Estrada.

The one area of concern with Claude will be on the defensive end of the floor. He graded out poorly on the defensive end last year at USC and had a negative Defensive BPM (box plus-minus). USC ranked 88th in KenPom’s adjusted defensive efficiency metric last season.

Oats stresses defense and it’ll be that end of the court that would determine how big of a role Claude would play in Tuscaloosa if he chooses to join the Crimson Tide.

Continue Reading

NIL

Mountaineers Win Big 12 Regular Season Title

Story Links Next Game: Kansas 5/16/2025 | 5 p.m. May. 16 (Fri) / 5 p.m.  Kansas MORGANTOWN, W.Va. – For the second time in three seasons, the West Virginia University baseball team has won the Big 12 regular season title. Despite a 3-0 […]

Published

on


MORGANTOWN, W.Va. – For the second time in three seasons, the West Virginia University baseball team has won the Big 12 regular season title. Despite a 3-0 loss to Kansas, Thursday night at Kendrick Family Ballpark, the Mountaineers clinched the outright title with Arizona State’s loss to Oklahoma State.
 
The Mountaineers are now 40-11 on the season and 19-7 in the Big 12 while the Jayhawks improve to 40-14 overall and 18-10 in conference play.
 
It is the 16th regular season title in program history for West Virginia and the second Big 12 championship, having shared the title in 2023.
 

BASE25: Big 12 Champions_1920x300

In Thursday’s game, redshirt senior Griffin Kirn threw 8.0 innings while allowing two runs and striking out 10. At the plate, senior Kyle West and freshman Gavin Kelly each had two hits.
 
Kansas took the lead in the first with a run-scoring fielder’s choice before tacking on with solo home runs in the eighth and ninth innings.
 
Jayhawk pitcher Dominic Voegele, the Big 12 Preseason Pitcher of the Year, tossed 7.0 shutout innings with six strikeouts to earn the victory.
 
The Mountaineers will look to even the series on Friday. With expected inclement weather, first pitch is now 5 p.m.
 
For more information on the Mountaineers, follow @WVUBaseball on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram.
 





Link

Continue Reading

Most Viewed Posts

Trending