Michael Brauner is a Senior Sports Analyst and Contributing Writer for Yellowhammer News. You can follow him on Twitter @MBraunerWNSP and hear him every weekday morning from 6 to 9 a.m. on “The Opening Kickoff” on WNSP-FM 105.5, available free online.
NIL
Spring 2025 ASUCD endorsements
The Editorial Board encourages you to consider accountability, diversity and fiscal responsibility when casting your ballot By THE EDITORIAL BOARD From April 21 to 25, the ASUCD spring elections are open for students to cast their ballots for six senators, one executive ticket and three measures, as well as a number of other elected officials. […]

The Editorial Board encourages you to consider accountability, diversity and fiscal responsibility when casting your ballot
By THE EDITORIAL BOARD
From April 21 to 25, the ASUCD spring elections are open for students to cast their ballots for six senators, one executive ticket and three measures, as well as a number of other elected officials. The California Aggie’s Editorial Board encourages you to exercise your right to vote this election season, as the ASUCD directly affects your day-to-day life as well as the use of your student fees — you deserve to have a say in how your money is being spent.
The Editorial Board invited all candidates for an interview and endorsed those we believe will best represent the needs and interests of the student body. Regardless of who you choose on your ballot, we hope you vote this election season. Please consider the following:
While ASUCD elections use a ranked-choice system, the endorsed candidates below are not listed in order of preference. The Editorial Board has ranked Senate candidates alphabetically for purposes of this article.
Presidential Ticket: Aaminah Mohammad & Nanki Kaur (Unite slate)
Aaminah Mohammad, a third-year biopsychology and international relations double major, and Nanki Kaur, a third-year biomedical engineering major, are running for president and internal vice president positions of the ASUCD, respectively, as part of the Unite slate. This presidential ticket’s platforms are instating comprehensive wellness, affordability and accessibility programs, expanding healthcare outreach and equity and ensuring the student body has access to resources. Additionally, this ticket is focusing on outreach to STEM students and their representation within the administration. Mohammad and Kaur have actionable plans — such as extending free rides to off-campus students with disabilities and creating funding pathways for non-identity-based registered student organizations (RSOs). In addition to these, this presidential ticket has plans to utilize legal resources for undocumented students, expand and revamp study spaces and streamline the hiring process for ASUCD positions. With Mohammad’s experience as internal vice president and Kaur’s experience as a senator, as well as their understanding of the ASUCD’s financial outlook and potential budget cuts, the Editorial Board believes this presidential ticket to be in the best interest of ASUCD and the students of UC Davis.
External Affairs Vice President: Janani Sundaram (Bitches slate)
Janani Sundaram is a third-year political science — public service major with a minor in public health. Some of her primary campaign focuses include empowering students, creating equity in university policy and protecting the rights of students to protest. Additionally, Sundaram is a part of the Bitches slate, which prioritizes safety, transparency and equity. As an out-of-state student, Sundaram has developed a diverse and understanding perspective. She is also committed to bringing more transparency and accountability to the ASUCD. The Editorial Board believes Sundaram is earnest about her advocacy efforts and equally committed to bringing her important sense of compassion to the table. We believe Sundaram would excel in the role of external affairs vice president.
Student Advocate: Inbar Schwartz (Independent)
A third-year economics and international relations double major, Inbar Schwartz has been with the Student Advocate Office (SAO) for two years. She has served as a case advisor and head of staff and currently serves as the vice student advocate, ensuring that students receive proper guidance in their dealings with the Office of Student Support and Judicial Affairs. Her dedication to students and advocating for their fair representation and defense was clear in her interview, as was her knowledge of the role and the duties therein. Though the race for student advocate is unopposed, the Editorial Board has chosen to endorse Schwartz as a show of recognition of her hard work at SAO and her longtime commitment to student success.
International Student Representative: Robi Castaneda (Bitches slate)
Robi Castaneda, a third-year political science and music double major, is clearly passionate about protecting international students. Castaneda seeks to expand legal resources for students navigating the visa and immigration process and has called for the creation of a fund to help cover related paperwork costs. His well-rounded and thorough approach to having the Office of the International Student Representative meet international students where they are, and on the issues most pressing to them, impressed the Editorial Board. His experience within ASUCD as an external affairs commissioner and his assertion that the student government should provide all of the support it can to its international students to ensure they can focus on their academic success also helped his campaign stand out.
Transfer Student Representative: Kelly Zamudio (Empoderar slate)
Kelly Zamudio is a third-year political science — public service and sociology double major, as well as a member of the Empoderar slate. In her interview, Kelly displayed a clear understanding of struggles that transfer students often go through during their collegiate transition. She also shared unwavering support for the transfer student community and their success, readily responding to questions with confidence and resolve. Zamudio emphasized pillars of community development, professional and academic growth and personal wellness that she plans to implement into creating inclusive spaces in collaboration with RSOs for students. An element of her interview that stood out in particular was her idea to ensure that there is transfer student representation on every ASUCD commission to ensure that their perspectives are properly represented. Zamudio’s clear-cut plans for the role, knowledge of the non-traditional-student experience and plans to advocate for transfer students across the Davis campus made her a very strong candidate — one that the Editorial Board has gladly decided to endorse.
Senator: Tianneh G. Bonardi (Empoderar slate)
Tianneh G. Bonardi is a first-generation, second-year political science and sociology double major, with an emphasis in law and society. Some of her campaign priorities include transparency and accountability, professionalism and collaboration and culture. She is also a proud supporter of Senate Resolution #7, which reaffirms protections for undocumented students. Bonardi is part of the Empoderar slate whose core values overlap with Bonardi’s campaign priorities. As a former interim senator, Bonardi’s understanding of the legislative process gives her a unique headstart as a candidate running for Senate. The Editorial Board was impressed with Bonardi’s commitment to inclusivity and increased cultural representation, and we believe she will thrive as a senator.
Senator: Hilda Cabello-Garcia (Independent)
As a first-generation student, Hilda Cabello-Garcia, a first-year political science major, is focusing her campaign on student well-being: aiming to ensure that all students, including low-income and mixed-status students, are provided with access to wellness and professional development services. Additionally, part of her campaign focuses on safety for the undocumented student population on campus. She is hoping to leverage her experience and interpersonal skills to make a positive impact on the student community, as well as looking to address injustice for students facing housing insecurity and environmental justice issues. The Editorial Board was impressed by Cabello-Garcia’s professionalism and vision, and we believe she will be both influential and successful as an ASUCD Senator.
Senator: Siena Dill-Cruz (Bitches slate)
Siena Dill-Cruz, a second-year political science and cinema and digital media double major, is a strong candidate for the ASUCD Senate. Representing the Bitches slate, her main campaign priorities include women’s health and safety, basic needs and financial accessibility, career development and student-led sustainability. Dill-Cruz’s plans for the position include Arboretum cleanup walks, campuswide clothing swaps and reducing single-use plastics in on-campus food locations. With her extensive experience working for many ASUCD units, such as KDVS and the Coffee House, Dill-Cruz understands the inner workings of the ASUCD. The Editorial Board has identified Dill-Cruz as a strong candidate for this year’s election cycle with her innovative ideas and ample experience in leadership roles.
Senator: Pattarin Khajornchaikul (Unite slate)
Pattarin Khajornchaikul is a member of the Unite slate, as well as a first-year economics and theater double major. Khajornchaikul currently serves as ASUCD associate vice president for internal communications and expressed that a large priority for her is to expedite the process of onboarding for student employees. Her prior experience working as a leader and organizer, including working for local and state politics, contributed to our confidence in her readiness for the role. Khajornchaikul’s platform emphasizes the necessity of basic needs for students; She hopes to help UC Davis expand the definition of basic needs to help students thrive, not just survive. This is particularly in regard to labor, which Khajornchaikul asserted should be considered a basic need in addition to necessities like food, transportation and housing. She also expressed interest in the quantitative element of the ASUCD Senate, backed up by experience working with and understanding budgets. Khajornchaikul also hopes to secure grants for RSOs, aiming to connect ASUCD to the student body by ensuring that students have the opportunity and the space to get involved. Her comfortability and knowledge of the behind-the-scenes operations of ASUCD impressed the Editorial Board, and we are confident that Khajornchaikul would excel in this position.
Senator: Aubri Lee (Risers slate)
Aubri Lee, a second-year environmental engineering major, is running for senator as part of the Risers slate). Her campaign focuses include raising awareness about gun violence, leading environmentally conscious events and implementing professional practice exams for careers in fields like medicine, law and engineering. Lee currently is an external affairs commissioner and as a member of the rowing team, she is also a student athlete. As a STEM major, Lee recognizes the lack of STEM representation in the Senate and wants to improve upon these issues. With her candidacy, Lee wants to encourage fellow STEM students to make their voices heard and feel inspired to follow in her footsteps. The Editorial Board appreciates Lee’s assertion that ASUCD is not a for-profit entity and its primary goal should be to serve the students. We feel that her strong work ethic and thoughtful plans for the senator position will allow her to excel in this role and positively benefit the student body.
Senator: Luis Leonardo Garcia (Empoderar slate)
Luis Leonardo Garcia has already proven himself a committed and capable student leader. As an interim senator in fall quarter 2024, he was consistently one of the most productive members of the Senate table and hosted the first Senate-sponsored event of the academic year. A second-year political science and communication double major, Garcia is running on the Empoderar slate to increase Hispanic representation within the ASUCD alongside fellow endorsed candidate Tianneh G. Bonardi. His recognition of the need for greater diversity amongst student leaders, and for the student government to reflect the undergraduates it represents, remains an increasingly important issue in this political landscape. The Editorial Board wholeheartedly endorses Luis Leonardo Garcia to return to the role he has proven uniquely adept at.
Vote “Yes” on ASUCD Constitutional Amendment #94
The Editorial Board encourages the student body to vote “yes” on Constitutional Amendment #94 to ensure that when there is a need for interim senators and other officeholders, they are held to democratic standards and their appointment process is transparent.
This proposed amendment, introduced by Senator Ezra Rubin and co-sponsored by Senator Dhilena Wickramasinghe, provides much-needed reform to the appointment process for interim elected officials in the ASUCD. For those who may not know, the ASUCD Senate is composed of 12 elected senators and two elected representatives who oversee the needs of the student body and the ASUCD’s over-20-million-dollar operational budget. This responsibility necessitates that the Senate is democratically elected and held accountable by those who voted them into office.
As it stands now, when vacancies arise outside of the typical election season (a senator steps down, graduates early or leaves offices early), interim senators are appointed by the ASUCD president. This amendment would make the appointment process of interim senators more democratic and decentralize executive powers. During fall quarter, five interim senators were appointed by the ASUCD president, meaning that nearly half of the Senate last fall was not elected by the student body. Constitutional Amendment #94 would have the Senate approve the appointment of interim senators, allowing for a public interview process where students can ask questions and share their opinions.
Vote “Yes” on ASUCD Constitutional Amendment #95
ASUCD Constitutional Amendment #95 ensures there are stricter repercussions in place if the student body’s elected officials are unable to meet training and volunteer requirements. The Editorial Board encourages you to vote “yes” to ensure accountability for those in the ASUCD.
This proposed amendment, introduced by Internal Affairs Commission Chair Amanda Clark and Senator Siddharth Jasthi, would incentivize senators to volunteer with units or committees to foster a stronger connection between entities within ASUCD. The amendment will also encourage senators to attend mandatory training seminars once sworn into office. While this is already mandated by ASUCD Bylaws, there are no clear enforcement mechanisms in place to incentivize participation. If passed, this amendment ensures that if a representative fails to meet their training requirements, their threshold for impeachment decreases by two points. If a representative fails to meet two volunteer hours with units or committees, their threshold for impeachment would decrease by one point.
Overall, the Editorial Board believes this amendment to be beneficial for senator engagement and the development of institutional knowledge.
Our Thoughts on Transportation Equity Fee
The Transportation Equity Fee proposes an additional five dollars per quarter (excluding summer session) for each undergraduate student. The Editorial Board advises you to look carefully at each of the proposed outcomes that come with voting “yes” or “no” to make the decision that best serves the student body as well as yourself.
The UC Davis Transportation Services regulates parking policies as well as provides general transportation needs for the campus community. Although their main revenue comes from parking fees, the organization has been working to reduce reliance on parking — a task which the fee referendum states could lead to lack of sustained funding for the Transportation Services in the future. These changes, however, have led to raised parking rates that adversely affect people that have no choice but to commute to campus.
If approved, the Transportation Equity Fee will provide a steady revenue stream for transportation demand management, bicycle safety programs and a transportation grant toward communities that are negatively impacted by high parking rates. However, the Editorial Board has not extended a full endorsement due to lack of clarity regarding the allocation of funds to grant programs and maintenance in the fee referendum’s language. While we understand that there are financial issues facing both Transportation Services and commuting students, we are unable to offer a full endorsement or rejection at this time.
In order for this referendum to be passed, a voter turnout of at least 20% of the undergraduate student body is needed and 60% voting “yes.”
Written by: The Editorial Board
NIL
Paul Finebaum: College football is facing an existential threat to the future of the game
Amid a slew of changes in college football over the past few years, concerns about the longevity of the sport have persistently popped up. It’s a popular offseason talking point, if nothing else. But ESPN analyst Paul Finebaum believes all the noise is more than just that. It’s a legitimate warning sign in the sport. […]

Amid a slew of changes in college football over the past few years, concerns about the longevity of the sport have persistently popped up. It’s a popular offseason talking point, if nothing else.
But ESPN analyst Paul Finebaum believes all the noise is more than just that. It’s a legitimate warning sign in the sport.
“100%. I think college football is at a tipping point, and I think what is going on now is an existential threat to the future of the game,” Finebaum said on the McElroy and Cubelic in the Morning radio program. “In a couple weeks, one thing we will all be saying is, ‘Just get me to that first Saturday. Get me to the last weekend in August and all this will go away.’ But all this will not go away. It’s still there.”
The changes to college football have been numerous. But in terms of order of magnitude, the transfer portal and NIL have been two of the biggest. Each presents its own set of challenges.
As college leadership moves to position itself for a new reality under the House settlement, everyone is grappling with the changes. Some are just ready for the never-ending offseason talk to end.
“A year ago, I really believed that the games on Saturday would cure the ills, and they were fantastic,” Finebaum said. “We all participate in them. But there is, slowly but surely, there is a disconnect. It’s the older fans first. And I know college administrators aren’t as concerned and television executives aren’t as concerned. But ultimately it will trickle down.”
The advent of a bigger playoff is another major change. After moving to 12 teams just last year, college football seems on the verge of an even bigger jump to 16 teams.
With that will come new qualifying measures, debates about automatic qualifying spots, and more. For Finebaum, though, the outlook of the playoff is less concerning than a problem coaches are already dealing with.
That’s equitable structures in the NIL era of college football. Easier said than done, as administrators lobbying in Congress are finding out.
“The fact that Kirby Smart had to say the other day when he’s at Regions that it’s not right for a freshman to be paid more than an upperclassman, I mean, there it is,” Finebaum explained. “It’s just a bizarre system and we don’t care that the players are making money, but ultimately,y the loyalty to the school is where the factor is. And it’s not so much the money, it’s not so much the talk of the playoffs.
“It’s the portal. It’s the fact that a player can leave at a moment’s notice with no commitment, no loyalty. I think (that) is disconnecting fans. It’s at a small rate right now, but it will expand.”
That’s a problem for college football, potentially. One that needs to be addressed in all forward-looking solutions.
NIL
Tuberville calls out Texas Longhorns while speaking about issues with NIL
Name, Image, and Likeness (NIL) rules in college football have taken center stage over the last couple of years, but the last month or so in particular it seems things have been scaled up a notch. The presence of President Donald Trump in potential action being taken by lawmakers to bring order to a chaotic […]

Name, Image, and Likeness (NIL) rules in college football have taken center stage over the last couple of years, but the last month or so in particular it seems things have been scaled up a notch.
The presence of President Donald Trump in potential action being taken by lawmakers to bring order to a chaotic system has ramped up the rhetoric and kept NIL in the news cycle.
With potential involvement in said action by former Alabama head coach Nick Saban, it’s become a complete firestorm.
U.S. Sen. Tommy Tuberville (R-Auburn) has long been at the forefront of the fight to fix a system that is clearly broken, or at the very least in need of some tuning up.
RELATED: Tuberville: Trump and Saban could join forces to tackle NIL reform – hopes to talk tonight at UA
From the potential elimination of non-revenue sports to other schools gaining a competitive advantage solely based off the size of their wallet, Tuberville has been one of the most powerful voices in politics on the topic.
Over the weekend, he put things in terms that residents in the Yellowhammer State understand better than anything else: by name dropping a hated rival and warning their seemingly endless supply of money tips the scales too much.
Referencing the Texas Longhorns, Tuberville issued a stern warning that if the system keeps progressing — or rather devolving — in the way it has, they will become unbeatable.
RELATED: Sen. Tuberville: ‘NIL has turned collegiate sports into the Wild West’
“You’re going to eliminate 90 percent of schools because they don’t have the money,” Tuberville stated via CBS Sports. “Look at Texas. Nobody’s ever going to beat them again if we allow them to keep going the way they’re going. Again, I’ve got nothing against Texas; they’re going by the rules, but we’ve got to hopefully make it work out.”
The Longhorns becoming a superteam who no other program can beat is probably unlikely, but the point remains.
NIL was pitched — obviously in addition to players profiting — as a way to balance the scales and bring to an end to power disparity in college football.
In reality it’s done the opposite and the rich have only gotten richer.
If something does not change, it will only get worse from here.
NIL
Universities cutting sports, others adding ahead of NCAA antitrust settlement
Over the past three months, a growing number of universities have added or dropped entire sports programs on the eve of dramatic changes coming to college athletics under the $2.8 billion NCAA settlement. UTEP dropped women’s tennis, Cal Poly discontinued swimming and diving, Marquette added women’s swimming and Grand Canyon shuttered a historically dominant men’s […]

Over the past three months, a growing number of universities have added or dropped entire sports programs on the eve of dramatic changes coming to college athletics under the $2.8 billion NCAA settlement.
UTEP dropped women’s tennis, Cal Poly discontinued swimming and diving, Marquette added women’s swimming and Grand Canyon shuttered a historically dominant men’s volleyball program. It was a dizzying set of decisions that appears to offer no pattern except one: Every school is facing a choice on which programs to carry forward once the money really starts flowing.
While top-tier athletes in high-revenue sports like football and basketball can look forward to robust compensation from their university for the use of their name, image and likeness, there is widespread uncertainty for athletes in the so-called non-revenue sports where tens of thousands of athletes compete largely under the radar.
For them, harsh cuts are a terrifying new reality as athletic departments weigh more than ever before which sports make the most sense to support financially; each school will be able to share as much as $20.5 million with athletes next year but top performers and revenue draws in the big sports will demand the most to keep them out of the transfer portal.
Under-the-radar sports programs are expected to take the back seat at many schools.
Patrick Rishe, executive director of the sports business program at Washington University, said college athletics is only at the beginning of a slew of decisions schools will have to make as a result of the settlement.
“There is going to be more competitive pressure on all universities to step up or else they’ll fall behind,” Rishe said. “So when you’re faced with that challenge, especially at the mid-majors or smaller Division I schools, then you’ve got to ask yourself, does it make sense to continue to carry particular programs?”
Programs at risk
Universities were hit hard financially during the pandemic and sports were affected. In June 2020, for example, UConn announced that it was dropping four sports to save money, a decision that affected more than 120 athletes.
Sports programs come and go, subject to budget woes or competitive concerns and wishes. The pace seems to have picked up ahead of the sweeping changes of the NCAA settlement.
Among the additions: women’s golf (St. Bonaventure and UT Arlington), stunt (Eastern New Mexico) and women’s swimming at Marquette, a Big East school with a top men’s basketball program but without football since 1960.
Among the cuts: women’s tennis (UTEP), men’s volleyball (Grand Canyon) and the swimming and diving programs with nearly 60 athletes at Cal Poly. Saint Francis, fresh off a March Madness appearance by it’s men’s basketball team, announced it will move from Division I to Division III over the next year, citing “realities like the transfer portal, pay-for-play and other shifts that move athletics away from love of the game.”
UTEP cited “upcoming changes to college athletics, including revenue sharing and roster caps.” Cal Poly said the House settlement will result “in a loss of at least $450,000 per year for our programs.”
The key difference from the pandemic-related cuts, Rishe said, is that they are not caused by a loss of revenue but an increase in expenses.
Behind the decisions
As schools wrestle with the prospect of eliminating sports, Rishe said he thinks some programs are safer than others. He pointed to Title IX, the federal law aimed at ensuring gender equity.
“I would suspect that the sports that are most likely going to be cut are going to be men’s sports, and I don’t say that with malice,” he said. “If you’re trying to stay compliant with Title IX, I don’t know how non-revenue men’s sports aren’t the sports that are more apt to be eliminated.”
The balancing out will be different at every school. Radford recently announced it will drop men’s and women’s tennis but add women’s flag football as a club sport and bolster its options for male runners.
At Marquette, athletic director Mike Broeker said the decision to add a women’s swim team was years in the making and based on demographics.
“I think it’s independent of what’s happening in college athletics right now and more about strengthening our position,” he said. “More females are going to college than males, and that creates differentiation. We want to make sure we’re offering an athletics program portfolio that meets our students’ interests based on our student population.”
What’s to come from a future so uncertain that some schools are ending decades of tradition? Rishe said nothing is off the table.
“It may sound crazy, it may have sounded crazy 10 years ago, but now it seems anything is possible,” Rishe said. “I think you could see a day where your top 30 or 40 universities financially are going to break off and form their own entity, leaving the rest of Division I to basically be their own class. I really do see that as a reality.”
NIL
Shai Gilgeous-Alexander, Thunder lock up spot in Western Conference Finals
For the first time in nearly 10 years, the Oklahoma City Thunder will return to the Western Conference Finals — and they can thank MVP favorite Shai Gilgeous-Alexander for getting them there. Behind 35 points from Gilgeous-Alexander, the top-seeded Thunder took it to the four-seeded Denver Nuggets in Sunday’s Game 7, cruising in the second […]

For the first time in nearly 10 years, the Oklahoma City Thunder will return to the Western Conference Finals — and they can thank MVP favorite Shai Gilgeous-Alexander for getting them there.
Behind 35 points from Gilgeous-Alexander, the top-seeded Thunder took it to the four-seeded Denver Nuggets in Sunday’s Game 7, cruising in the second half to a dominant 125-93 victory at home. The Nuggets sprinted out to the early lead before OKC’s offense found a rhythm going into halftime. The Thunder led by as many as 43 points in the fourth quarter after trailing by as many as 11 points in the first.
With the win, SGA advances to the first Conference Finals appearance of his seven-year career. Alongside fellow Wildcat guard Cason Wallace, they’ll lead the Thunder into the next round against Julius Randle, Rob Dillingham, and the Minnesota Timberwolves. That series begins on Tuesday night in OKC. Even with only two teams remaining in the Western Conference, we’ve still got four Kentucky guys roaming the floor, three of them playing significant minutes (sorry, Dillingham).
Gilgeous-Alexander was terrific all series long against Denver, but hit another gear in the final few games. He dropped 31 points in a Game 5 win and followed it up with 32 more in a Game 6 loss. But his 35 points on Sunday marked a series-high. SGA shot an efficient 12-19 from the field (3-4 3PT) to get there while adding four assists, three rebounds, and three steals to his stat line in 36 minutes played. And oh yeah, he didn’t turn the ball over once.
Wallace chipped in seven points, five assists, three rebounds, and two steals in 28 minutes off the pine for OKC. Whenever the second-year guard is on the floor, he plays winning basketball — on both ends.
But while there was a celebration to be had in the Thunder locker room after the win, there was disappointment coming from the other end of the floor. Nikola Jokic, who is expected to finish second in MVP voting behind Gilgeous-Alexander, was held in check (by his standards) in Game 7: “only” 20 points, nine rebounds, and seven assists with five turnovers.
Jokic’s co-star, Jamal Murray, struggled to his a groove offensively. The former ‘Cat finished with a series-low 13 points on 6-16 shooting (1-8 3PT). It was a so-so playoffs for Murray, who just hasn’t been able to replicate the postseason success he had in the 2020 bubble and the Nuggets’ title run in 2023.
Karl-Anthony Towns representing Kentucky in the East
The Western Conference Finals won’t be the only series with some Kentucky flavor, though. Karl-Anthony Towns and the New York Knicks will take on the Indiana Pacers in the Eastern Conference Finals. And had Isaiah Jackson not suffered an Achilles injury early into the season for Indiana, we’d have even more Wildcats in the final two rounds.
Towns has been far from perfect through the first two series, but he’s done more than enough to contribute to New York’s wins. In the Knicks’ six Eastern Conference Semifinal games against the Boston Celtics, KAT averaged 19.8 points and 12.7 rebounds per outing while shooting 47.3 percent from the floor. His three-point shooting (3-19) and foul troubles (4.3 per game) were issues against Boston, but he can remedy that by bouncing back against the Pacers.
Game 1 between the Knicks and Pacers is set for Wednesday. Between the four remaining teams, none of them has won an NBA Finals since the 1970s.
NIL
The Sam Bradford Problem Took Down the NFL Once, Now It’s College Football’s Crisis
College football is facing a financial reckoning, and it’s happening at breakneck speed. In just three years since introducing Name, Image, and Likeness (NIL) rules in 2021, the sport has stumbled into what some call the “Sam Bradford Problem.” While the term may seem complex, the problem is familiar to football. Who are the top […]

College football is facing a financial reckoning, and it’s happening at breakneck speed. In just three years since introducing Name, Image, and Likeness (NIL) rules in 2021, the sport has stumbled into what some call the “Sam Bradford Problem.” While the term may seem complex, the problem is familiar to football.

What Is the Sam Bradford Problem?
The “Sam Bradford Problem” is a term that harkens back to the NFL’s own salary struggles in 2010. Bradford signed a staggering six-year, $78 million contract with the St. Louis Rams as a rookie, making him one of the highest-paid players in the league before he’d even taken a snap.
In 2010, Bradford’s deal with the Rams set a dangerous precedent in the NFL. Rookies, often drafted high based on potential rather than proven performance, were commanding salaries that dwarfed those of established stars who’d been grinding for years. This led to resentment in locker rooms and financial strain for teams, as massive rookie contracts ate up salary cap space.
The NFL took 90 years to confront this kind of rookie-veteran pay disparity, eventually addressing it with a rookie wage scale in the 2011 Collective Bargaining Agreement (CBA). College football, however, has barreled into the same issue in a fraction of the time, and the fallout could reshape the sport as we know it.
It took like 3 years for college football to develop a Sam Bradford Problem
Took the NFL 90 years https://t.co/w0ptGgSbBW
— James David Dickson (@downi75) May 16, 2025
Fast-forward to this year, and college football is grappling with a similar imbalance, but the stakes feel even higher. The landscape has shifted dramatically since the NCAA allowed athletes to profit from their name, image, and likeness in 2021.
Speaking on “The Paul Finebaum Show” recently, Georgia Bulldogs head coach Kirby Smart, one of the most successful coaches, sounded the alarm on this issue. He implied that he wants a respectful system and more pay for seniority.
“I just want to be able to have a freshman come in and not make more than a senior, and I’d like for other sports to be able to still survive. You know, we’re on the brink of probably one to two years away from a lot of schools cutting sports,” highlighting how this pay disparity disrupts team hierarchy and threatens the broader ecosystem of college sports to a great extent.
RELATED: Georgia Coach Kirby Smart Issues Stark Warning About NIL Chaos and What’s Coming Next for College Sports
Top recruits are signing NIL deals worth millions before they even step on campus, often out-earning upperclassmen who’ve put in years of work. While it is impressive to see such young talent perform well in life, our favorite players build a strong financial foundation, the lopsided pay has created frustrations and instability, to say the least.
Multiple calls have reiterated some form of control on the pay scale, and those who value loyalty have been hurt by the ever-changing landscape.
College Sports Network has you covered with the latest news, analysis, insights, and trending stories in college football, men’s college basketball, women’s college basketball, and college baseball!
NIL
Texas A&M is Getting Roasted for Another Underwhelming Athletic Year
In terms of true spending power, there might not be a program in college athletics that holds more weight than Texas A&M. The Aggies are heavily backed by oil-based money moguls that can drop seven-figure checks by the athletic director’s office without batting an eye, but it has yet to get them over the hump […]
In terms of true spending power, there might not be a program in college athletics that holds more weight than Texas A&M.
The Aggies are heavily backed by oil-based money moguls that can drop seven-figure checks by the athletic director’s office without batting an eye, but it has yet to get them over the hump in the NIL era.
A&M fans have endured 122 seasons of baseball without a national title, and despite claiming three national titles—the most recent being in 1939—the Aggies football team has never won a nationally recognized championship in its 131-year history. Basketball has never made a Final Four, or an Elite Eight for that matter, and softball, well, it has won two national titles—but not since 1987.
This spring, it appeared that the program’s baseball and softball teams might have a chance to end their collective drought’s but after some late-night drama on Sunday, those hopes came crashing down in yet another disappointing result.
Coming into the 2025 season, Texas A&M’s softball program was the Preseason No. 1 team in the country and the trendy pick to win a national championship. Fast forward to the end of the regular season and the Aggies are 28-25 (11-19 SEC) and will likely be headed home when the NCAA Tournament starts.
After a 47-10 regular season, the Texas A&M softball team earned the No. 1 seed in the NCAA Tournament and were among a short list of favorites to dethrone Oklahoma. Then, in the blink of an eye, they became the first ever No. 1 seed to fail to advance out of their own regional.
-
Fashion2 weeks ago
How to watch Avalanche vs. Stars Game 7 FREE stream today
-
High School Sports2 weeks ago
Web exclusive
-
Sports2 weeks ago
Princeton University
-
Sports1 week ago
2025 NCAA softball bracket: Women’s College World Series scores, schedule
-
Motorsports2 weeks ago
Bowman Gray is the site of NASCAR’S “Advance Auto Parts Night at the Races” this Saturday
-
NIL2 weeks ago
2025 Big Ten Softball Tournament Bracket: Updated matchups, scores, schedule
-
NIL2 weeks ago
Patty Gasso confirms Sophia Bordi will not finish season with Oklahoma softball
-
Motorsports2 weeks ago
MOTORSPORTS: Three local track set to open this week | Sports
-
Motorsports2 weeks ago
$1.5 Billion Legal Powerhouse Announces Multi-Year NASCAR Deal With Kyle Busch
-
High School Sports2 weeks ago
Maryland Basketball Recruiting