Connect with us

NIL

Nick Saban expected to co-chair Trump administration’s commission on college football, per report

USATSI Former Alabama coach Nick Saban and Texas businessman Cody Campbell, founder of Texas Tech’s Matador Club NIL collective and chairman of the Texas Tech board of regents, are expected to co-chair President Donald Trump’s commission into college athletics, according to The Athletic. The news comes after Trump met with Saban to discuss potential name, image […]

Published

on


adobe-express-file-84.jpg
USATSI

Former Alabama coach Nick Saban and Texas businessman Cody Campbell, founder of Texas Tech’s Matador Club NIL collective and chairman of the Texas Tech board of regents, are expected to co-chair President Donald Trump’s commission into college athletics, according to The Athletic. The news comes after Trump met with Saban to discuss potential name, image and likeness reform. 

The commission would examine prominent issues facing college sports like the transfer portal, unregulated booster compensation that goes directly to athletes, the employment of college athletes and Title IX, among other hot-button topics, according to Yahoo Sports. 

Trump was also recently in Tuscaloosa to deliver the University of Alabama’s commencement speech. 

The president is also considering an executive order aimed at greater scrutiny towards NIL deals, though any executive order would likely still need congressional action, NCAA president Charlie Baker told Dennis Dodd in April.

President Donald Trump considering executive order for NIL after meeting with Nick Saban, per report

Cameron Salerno

President Donald Trump considering executive order for NIL after meeting with Nick Saban, per report

Sen. Tommy Tuberville of Alabama, who previously had stints as the coach at Ole Miss, Auburn, Texas Tech and Cincinnati, also said he spoke with the Trump administration about NIL. 

“College football is the heart and soul of America — but it’s in danger if we don’t level the playing field,” Tuberville posted on social media.

Saban, a seven-time national champion who retired from coaching in January 2024, has remained a prominent figure in college football. Upon his decision to step away from Alabama, he was hired as an analyst on ESPN’s “College GameDay.”

He also maintains an office inside Alabama’s Bryant-Denny Stadium and works in an advisory role to Crimson Tide athletics. 





Link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

NIL

House Settlement’s Arbitration Will Limit NIL Clearinghouse Lawsuits

One of the more controversial features of the approved House settlement is a clearinghouse review of NIL deals that exceed $600 to ensure they are legitimately about use of an athlete’s right of publicity and not veiled payments to convince an athlete to attend and remain at a school.  Some have speculated that the denial of proposed NIL […]

Published

on


One of the more controversial features of the approved House settlement is a clearinghouse review of NIL deals that exceed $600 to ensure they are legitimately about use of an athlete’s right of publicity and not veiled payments to convince an athlete to attend and remain at a school. 

Some have speculated that the denial of proposed NIL deals will motivate athletes and the businesses with whom they seek to partner to sue the clearinghouse, and perhaps other defendants. Possible claims could include alleged violations of state NIL statutes, tortious interference with prospective NIL contracts and suppression of economic opportunities as protected by state and federal antitrust laws.

There’s an important factor being overlooked: The role of arbitration, which will make it far more difficult for an athlete or a company with which the athlete seeks to sign an NIL deal to wage a successful lawsuit. 

The narrow means of challenging arbitration awards will likely deter attorneys who would otherwise jump at the chance to bring a lawsuit that would attract media attention. The prospect of overcoming judicial deference to an arbitration award is an important and often overlooked factor.

Deloitte, in partnership with the new College Sports Commission, will oversee NIL Go. The clearinghouse will use a fair market algorithm to assess if an NIL deal has a plausible relationship to the value of the athlete’s right of publicity in the context of a proposed deal. Hypothetically, an athlete being offered $1 million to sign with a local car dealership that typically pays endorsers less than $10,000 would need to explain the logic of the $1 million amount.  

While NIL is a relatively new term, it reflects a longstanding legal principle–the right of publicity–that is protected by states’ laws. This right has played an instrumental role in protecting actors, musicians and pro athletes from misappropriation of their unique and marketable personal qualities. College athletes have always had the right of publicity, but until the NCAA’s hand was forced by Ed O’Bannon’s case over the unlicensed use of athletes’ likenesses in video games and states enacting NIL statutes, NCAA rules had conditioned eligibility on (among other things) athletes not profiting from their identity.

Since 2021, NIL has sometimes morphed into a vehicle to pay athletes to attend and remain at a school. Even if those arrangements are called “NIL deals,” they’re substantively not about NIL. They are pay-for-play arrangements, which remain prohibited by NCAA rules.

NIL Go will be charged with clearing or not clearing NIL deals. In instances where more review is needed, the College Sports Commission will conduct its own screening. Athletes whose deals are rejected will have the chance to revise those deals and submit revisions for review. They can also file an appeal to neutral arbitration.

Arbitration is a private dispute resolution forum that parties contractually assent to use in lieu of litigation. Although arbitration and litigation are sometimes discussed interchangeably, they are quite different. Arbitration is conducted behind closed doors, meaning that–unlike in litigation– writing filings, evidence, testimony and transcripts are shielded from public review. There is no judge or jury in an arbitration. Instead, the arbitrator is typically a subject matter expert, who is usually an attorney with relevant expertise and is sometimes a law professor or retired judge.  The arbitrator issues a decision, known as an “award,” and it is an order that the parties have contractually agreed to follow.

As repeatedly seen in sports law in recent years, whether it’s when NFL coaches sue the NFL over employment disputes, when NFL agents sue one another over client recruitment or when NBA teams suing each other over trade secrets, judges who are asked to vacate arbitration awards are very reluctant to do so.

The Federal Arbitration Act and the Labor Management Relations Act instruct that judges are generally expected to sustain arbitration awards when the loser challenges them in court. There are only exceptional circumstances, such as when the award was procured by fraud or when the arbitrator refused to consider relevant evidence or follow basic legal principles, that warrant vacating an award. Some estimates find that judges vacate awards only around 10% of the time. Even when a judge vacates an arbitration award, the “winner” of that court ruling doesn’t necessarily “win” the dispute. Instead, they ordinarily get another shot at arbitration—where they might lose again.

To be sure, there are variables with arbitration review of clearinghouse decisions regarding NIL deals. Arbitration ordinarily arises in circumstances where the parties are in an employment or consumer relationship. When an NFL coach signs an employment contract, the contract will contain an arbitration provision. When a consumer buys a new computer, the fine print usually details an arbitration provision. 

Under current applications of law, a college athlete is not an employee. The athlete is also not acting as a consumer when signing an NIL deal. The athlete is instead a student who wishes to sign an NIL deal with a third party wherein they would be an independent contractor. That NIL deal is not what gives rise to arbitration—it is instead the approved House settlement’s procedure for injunctive relief. The settlement governs the athlete like other class members and, as a contract, the settlement has a nexus to the athlete. But it is a different relationship from employment or consumer contexts and different from, say, an NBA team owner contractually agreeing to the league commissioner having authority to review team-to-team disputes.

Whether distinctions in the college sports context prove to be distinctions without making a legal difference remains to be seen. But those predicting an avalanche of college athletes suing over denied NIL deals should be a factor in the role of arbitration as a major deterrent to litigation.



Link

Continue Reading

NIL

Arch Manning's Texas Longhorns have fierce competition in NIL sphere from next door rival

Heading into the 2025 college football season, there are clear favorites to make it to and win the College Football Playoff. Perhaps no team comes into the season with more eyes on it than the Texas Longhorns, even though they may not be the flat-out favorite to win it all. That’s thanks to Arch Manning, […]

Published

on

Arch Manning's Texas Longhorns have fierce competition in NIL sphere from next door rival

Heading into the 2025 college football season, there are clear favorites to make it to and win the College Football Playoff. Perhaps no team comes into the season with more eyes on it than the Texas Longhorns, even though they may not be the flat-out favorite to win it all. That’s thanks to Arch Manning, who has shined in his limited appearances.

There are certain games on the Longhorns’ schedule that will be circled. Of course, the season opener against the reigning champion Ohio State Buckeyes. Then there’s the regular season finale, against neighbor Texas A&M. But beyond the games, there are battles behind the scenes occurring with the Longhorns, the big schools and other teams in Texas. And the Longhorns may be falling slightly behind.

Arch Manning causes chaos at Texas campus as students scramble to stop him

Texas Tech considered the college football team with most offseason hype

Carter Bahns of CBS Sports recently listed out the 12 teams across the nation who have generated the most buzz during this offseason. While the Longhorns appear on the list, it’s their in-state rivals, the Texas Tech Red Raiders, who topped it. Bahns had this to say about their offseason.

Bruce Feldman on Arch Manning’s expectations and Texas outlook | The Herd

There is a new player in the NIL arms race as Texas Tech ramped up its spending across all sports, and nowhere was that more evident than in the football program. Seemingly out of nowhere, the Red Raiders built the nation’s second-ranked transfer portal class with 13 blue-chip additions — the most of any team in the country. The Big 12 is as wide open as any conference, and Joey McGuire’s squad is well-positioned to take advantage of the logjam and emerge as the league’s top College Football Playoff contender on the heels of its splashy offseason.

The Red Raiders have come in between 15-25 on most preseason Top 25 ranking lists. Much of those high rankings are simply due to their transfer portal and recruiting moves. In three seasons under head coach Joey McGuire, Texas Tech has gone 8-5, 7-6 and 8-5.

With quarterback Behren Morton back for a final season after showing marked improvement in 2024, the sky is the limit for the Red Raiders with all of their new additions. Texas Tech paid particular attention to the defense through the portal, as well as by hiring defensive coordinator Shiel Wood from the Houston Cougars.

Continue Reading

NIL

NiJaree Canady Makes NCAA History with $1 Million NIL Deal

Breaking New Ground in Women’s Sports In the evolving landscape of collegiate athletics, NiJaree Canady’s recent achievements have resonated far beyond the softball diamond. As a standout pitcher for Texas Tech, Canady has not only led her team to their inaugural Women’s College World Series appearance but has also shattered financial barriers by securing a […]

Published

on


Breaking New Ground in Women’s Sports

In the evolving landscape of collegiate athletics, NiJaree Canady’s recent achievements have resonated far beyond the softball diamond. As a standout pitcher for Texas Tech, Canady has not only led her team to their inaugural Women’s College World Series appearance but has also shattered financial barriers by securing a groundbreaking $1 million Name, Image, and Likeness (NIL) deal. This remarkable accomplishment marks her as the first softball player to reach such financial heights with multiple million-dollar agreements, setting a new precedent for female athletes everywhere.

A Champion for Change

Brittany Mahomes, a prominent advocate for women’s sports and wife of NFL star Patrick Mahomes, has been vocal in her support of Canady’s success. Through her social media channels, Brittany celebrated Canady’s historic achievement, urging the community to “invest in women’s sports & athletes.” Her endorsement highlights the growing movement to recognize and support female athletes’ contributions, both on and off the field.

The Rise of NiJaree Canady

Canady’s journey to this pinnacle of success is a testament to her talent and determination. Her leadership and skill on the field have been instrumental in Texas Tech’s breakthrough season, inspiring her teammates and setting new standards for the program. Beyond her athletic prowess, Canady’s ability to secure lucrative NIL deals underscores a shifting paradigm in collegiate sports, where female athletes are increasingly gaining recognition and financial opportunities previously reserved for their male counterparts.

The Broader Implications

NiJaree Canady’s achievements reflect a broader revolution in women’s sports, where financial empowerment and visibility are becoming more attainable. Her success story is not just about personal triumph but also about paving the way for future generations of female athletes. By breaking through financial barriers, Canady is helping to redefine what is possible for women in sports, encouraging young athletes to dream bigger and aim higher.

Looking Ahead

As NiJaree Canady continues to excel both on the field and in her financial endeavors, her story serves as a beacon of possibility and progress. Her influence extends beyond her immediate achievements, sparking conversations about equality and investment in women’s sports. The future looks bright, not just for Canady, but for the many athletes who will follow in her footsteps, inspired by her trailblazing path.



Link

Continue Reading

NIL

David Pollack worried about poaching if college football goes to one January transfer portal window

While there wasn’t much in the way of transformative change coming out the SEC’s annual Spring Meetings late last month, arguably the most impactful things to take place inside the famed Sandestin Hilton was a collective agreement for a single NCAA Transfer Portal window in January. During the three-day event in Destin, Fla., SEC commissioner […]

Published

on

David Pollack worried about poaching if college football goes to one January transfer portal window

While there wasn’t much in the way of transformative change coming out the SEC’s annual Spring Meetings late last month, arguably the most impactful things to take place inside the famed Sandestin Hilton was a collective agreement for a single NCAA Transfer Portal window in January.

During the three-day event in Destin, Fla., SEC commissioner Greg Sankey revealed the league’s football coaches had their support behind a potential 10-day transfer portal window in January, right in the heart of the College Football Playoff. If that ultimately isn’t a possibility, Sankey explained the SEC coaches would rather keep the two Winter and Spring portal windows as is rather than a single window in April in the middle of Spring practice. During the 2024-25 academic calendar, FBS football had one window from Dec. 9-28 and a second, shorter window from April 16-25.

In fact, Georgia head coach Kirby Smart was among the biggest proponents of the 10-day January window because it’d lessen the on-field impact on the college football postseason. That said, Smart acknowledged not every team has Georgia’s problem, and was told complaining about a portal window when his team is annually preparing for the College Football Playoff is akin to “crying from a yacht.”

“We had a meeting in which we unanimously decided that there really needed to be one portal window, whatever that is, what it is, and it needs to happen sometime in January,” Smart said during SEC Spring Meetings last month.

Of course, not everyone agrees, including former Georgia great David Pollack, who raised concerns that a December portal period would only invite more in-season “poaching” from opposing coaches.

David Pollack: ‘Your roster is going to get pillaged during the season’ with a January portal window

“I think it’s interesting that he says January. He’s a team-builder, that’s what he does, so he has an opinion that I think is obviously what he thinks is best for the sport,” Pollack said on a recent episode of his See Ball Get Ball podcast. “I’m just curious why it’s not May. I would want to make it May. And I’m talking about if I’m building a roster, because if it’s January, your roster is going to get pillaged during the season. I’d hate that. I can’t stand that.”

Pollack explained his May proposal by pointing out the later window would allow coaches to be more informed about the makeup of their roster, including the incoming freshmen that went through Spring practice.

“In May, I kind of understand what my roster is. I’ve been with those guys for awhile, and now I know what holes to fill,” Pollack said. “I don’t love January because I just don’t love the idea of poaching. And during a season, you saw last year people basically committing after the season to play somewhere else (while) the season was still going on.”

For his part, Smart has already addressed the potential pitfalls of a Spring portal window, be it in April or May.

“You think tampering’s a problem? Put that portal in April and see what teams do in January, February and March,” Smart said. “Just think about it now, because we’re getting ready to make a big decision and a lot of people believe, ‘Well the kids won’t be able to leave if we put it in April, they’ll have to stay the next semester.’ Oh no. They’ll be on your campus getting tampered with, collecting 33% of your cap before they leave with it. Not for that.”

— On3’s Thomas Goldkamp and Nick Kosko contributed to this report.

Continue Reading

NIL

Clearinghouse Denial of NIL Deals to Be Limited by Arbitration

One of the more controversial features of the approved House settlement is a clearinghouse review of NIL deals that exceed $600 to ensure they are legitimately about use of an athlete’s right of publicity and not veiled payments to convince an athlete to attend and remain at a school.  Some have speculated that the denial of proposed NIL […]

Published

on

Clearinghouse Denial of NIL Deals to Be Limited by Arbitration

One of the more controversial features of the approved House settlement is a clearinghouse review of NIL deals that exceed $600 to ensure they are legitimately about use of an athlete’s right of publicity and not veiled payments to convince an athlete to attend and remain at a school. 

Some have speculated that the denial of proposed NIL deals will motivate athletes and the businesses with whom they seek to partner to sue the clearinghouse, and perhaps other defendants. Possible claims could include alleged violations of state NIL statutes, tortious interference with prospective NIL contracts and suppression of economic opportunities as protected by state and federal antitrust laws.

There’s an important factor being overlooked: The role of arbitration, which will make it far more difficult for an athlete or a company with which the athlete seeks to sign an NIL deal to wage a successful lawsuit. 

The narrow means of challenging arbitration awards will likely deter attorneys who would otherwise jump at the chance to bring a lawsuit that would attract media attention. The prospect of overcoming judicial deference to an arbitration award is an important and often overlooked factor.

Deloitte, in partnership with the new College Sports Commission, will oversee NIL Go. The clearinghouse will use a fair market algorithm to assess if an NIL deal has a plausible relationship to the value of the athlete’s right of publicity in the context of a proposed deal. Hypothetically, an athlete being offered $1 million to sign with a local car dealership that typically pays endorsers less than $10,000 would need to explain the logic of the $1 million amount.  

While NIL is a relatively new term, it reflects a longstanding legal principle–the right of publicity–that is protected by states’ laws. This right has played an instrumental role in protecting actors, musicians and pro athletes from misappropriation of their unique and marketable personal qualities. College athletes have always had the right of publicity, but until the NCAA’s hand was forced by Ed O’Bannon’s case over the unlicensed use of athletes’ likenesses in video games and states enacting NIL statutes, NCAA rules had conditioned eligibility on (among other things) athletes not profiting from their identity.

Since 2021, NIL has sometimes morphed into a vehicle to pay athletes to attend and remain at a school. Even if those arrangements are called “NIL deals,” they’re substantively not about NIL. They are pay-for-play arrangements, which remain prohibited by NCAA rules.

NIL Go will be charged with clearing or not clearing NIL deals. In instances where more review is needed, the College Sports Commission will conduct its own screening. Athletes whose deals are rejected will have the chance to revise those deals and submit revisions for review. They can also file an appeal to neutral arbitration.

Arbitration is a private dispute resolution forum that parties contractually assent to use in lieu of litigation. Although arbitration and litigation are sometimes discussed interchangeably, they are quite different. Arbitration is conducted behind closed doors, meaning that–unlike in litigation– writing filings, evidence, testimony and transcripts are shielded from public review. There is no judge or jury in an arbitration. Instead, the arbitrator is typically a subject matter expert, who is usually an attorney with relevant expertise and is sometimes a law professor or retired judge.  The arbitrator issues a decision, known as an “award,” and it is an order that the parties have contractually agreed to follow.

As repeatedly seen in sports law in recent years, whether it’s when NFL coaches sue the NFL over employment disputes, when NFL agents sue one another over client recruitment or when NBA teamssuing each other over trade secrets, judges who are asked to vacate arbitration awards are very reluctant to do so.

The Federal Arbitration Act and the Labor Management Relations Act instruct that judges are generally expected to sustain arbitration awards when the loser challenges them in court. There are only exceptional circumstances, such as when the award was procured by fraud or when the arbitrator refused to consider relevant evidence or follow basic legal principles, that warrant vacating an award. Some estimates find that judges vacate awards only around 10% of the time. Even when a judge vacates an arbitration award, the “winner” of that court ruling doesn’t necessarily “win” the dispute. Instead, they ordinarily get another shot at arbitration—where they might lose again.

To be sure, there are variables with arbitration review of clearinghouse decisions regarding NIL deals. Arbitration ordinarily arises in circumstances where the parties are in an employment or consumer relationship. When an NFL coach signs an employment contract, the contract will contain an arbitration provision. When a consumer buys a new computer, the fine print usually details an arbitration provision. 

Under current applications of law, a college athlete is not an employee. The athlete is also not acting as a consumer when signing an NIL deal. The athlete is instead a student who wishes to sign an NIL deal with a third party wherein they would be an independent contractor. That NIL deal is not what gives rise to arbitration—it is instead the approved House settlement’s procedure for injunctive relief. The settlement governs the athlete like other class members and, as a contract, the settlement has a nexus to the athlete. But it is a different relationship from employment or consumer contexts and different from, say, an NBA team owner contractually agreeing to the league commissioner having authority to review team-to-team disputes.

Whether distinctions in the college sports context prove to be distinctions without making a legal difference remains to be seen. But those predicting an avalanche of college athletes suing over denied NIL deals should be a factor in the role of arbitration as a major deterrent to litigation.

Continue Reading

NIL

Teen passenger dies in Paulding County crash, driver injured

A 17-year-old from Defiance was killed in an overnight crash in Paulding County, OSHP said. The driver, an 18-year-old from Oakwood, suffered serious injuries. PAULDING COUNTY, Ohio — A 17-year-old from Defiance was killed and an 18-year-old driver was seriously injured in a single-vehicle crash early Sunday in Paulding County, according to the Ohio State Highway […]

Published

on

Teen passenger dies in Paulding County crash, driver injured

A 17-year-old from Defiance was killed in an overnight crash in Paulding County, OSHP said. The driver, an 18-year-old from Oakwood, suffered serious injuries.

PAULDING COUNTY, Ohio — A 17-year-old from Defiance was killed and an 18-year-old driver was seriously injured in a single-vehicle crash early Sunday in Paulding County, according to the Ohio State Highway Patrol.

Troopers from the Van Wert Highway Patrol Post responded to the crash at 1:09 a.m. on County Road 133 at the intersection of State Route 111 in Emerald Township.

An 18-year-old driver, from Oakwood, was driving north on CR133 when he failed to stop at the SR111 stop sign, according to a media release from the Ohio State Highway Patrol. After entering the intersection, the vehicle left the road and struck a tree.

The front seat passenger, identified as a 17-year-old from Defiance, died at the scene.

The driver was taken to the hospital with serious injuries.

The crash remains under investigation.

The Ohio State Highway Patrol was assisted at the scene by the Paulding County Sheriff’s Office, Paulding Fire and EMS, the Paulding County Coroner and R&O Services.

Want more from WTOL 11 News?

➡️ Stay up to date on what’s happening in your community with a 24/7 live stream and on-demand content from WTOL 11+Download on your TV and watch for free.

Our WTOL 11+ apps are available to download on Roku, Apple and Fire TV so you can watch today’s news whenever you want.

RELATED: How to stream news and programs on WTOL 11+ for free

WTOL 11+ features the latest breaking news and weather, plus daily talk shows, coverage of your favorite sports teams and trending local and national stories.

➡️ Get the WTOL 11 weather app for the latest local 10-day forecast and live radar on your phone! 

➡️ Download the WTOL 11 news mobile app for Apple here or get it in the Google store here.

➡️ Get a fresh start to your morning and wrap up your day with the latest news and your WTOL 11 Weather forecast delivered right to your inbox!

WTOL 11’s Your Morning Blast and Your Evening Blast deliver stories from northwest Ohio, southeast Michigan and beyond to keep you informed.

Click here to get on the list!

➡️ Looking for the lowest current local gas prices? Check out the WTOL 11 gas price tracker, powered by GasBuddy, here.

Continue Reading

Most Viewed Posts

Trending