On April 8, Stanford announced to investigation participants that an external investigator had been hired to conduct an investigation into men’s water polo head coach Brian Flacks for alleged retaliation against his players following an initial investigation that closed in February, clearing Flacks of emotional abuse allegations.
Letters to the University sent between August and May by parents of players raised concerns about Flacks’ abusive behaviors, intimidation and retaliation. One letter considered by the University as a part of the first investigation, which was reviewed by The Daily, alleged that Flacks’ punishments included “public shaming and belittling, vicious and intense shouting, manipulative psychological mind games, and limiting playtime.”
Families and players now accuse Flacks of retaliation against the players who participated in the initial abuse investigation.
In a public statement made in April, Flacks’ attorney wrote, “He has been fully exonerated and this matter is appropriately closed. Any allegations of retaliation against players are as preposterous as they are false. It is unfortunate that such a false cloud should continue to hang over both the coach and Stanford as they both deserve better.”
Flacks — a UCLA water polo walk-on — served as head coach at Harvard Westlake High School’s Water Polo from 2011 until he was hired by Stanford in 2022. The Daily reached out to Flacks for comment but was told that he could not provide comment due to the ongoing investigation.
“When [my son] enrolled at Stanford and joined the Stanford water polo team, we entrusted both the University and the team with his physical and psychological well-being. We were profoundly disappointed,” a family formerly associated with the team wrote in a statement to The Daily. They chose to be anonymous for fear of retaliation against their family.
In April, two former and 13 current players wrote letters of support for Flacks following the launch of the second investigation. Water polo team captain CJ Indart ’25 wrote in a statement to The Daily that the letter “was written and signed without any involvement or pressure from the coaching staff. The individuals who signed said statement did so on their own volition.”
30 parents of players also wrote and signed a letter of support for Flacks, writing that “a supermajority of parents support Brian Flacks.”
Danielle Pittman, whose son Riley Pittman ’25 was the team’s 2024 senior captain, labeled Flacks’ treatment as a case of “tough love” and likened him to former Alabama football coach Nick Saban.
“I don’t think it’s accurate to say [Flacks is] unfair. I’m not gonna say that kids didn’t get upset because I think athletes in all programs across the nation and in other countries get upset too. I just think it’s the nature of the beast,” Pittman said.
The first investigation began in the fall following letters written to the University by parents of current and former players on the team. In one of the letters sent in September, which was reviewed by The Daily, parents alleged that “Flacks clearly does not believe in any ‘positive coaching’ and has said to the team he doesn’t believe in positive feedback. He does believe in practicing under constant and immense pressure, with only negative or critical feedback, and has demonstrated limited patience for any behaviors other than strict obedience to his authoritarian practices.”
In a statement to the San Francisco Chronicle, a University spokesperson said that Flacks received a letter at the conclusion of the investigation, which “did not substantiate the claims that were raised” in the initial investigation.
The second investigation into alleged retaliation against players for sparking the first investigation came amid a wave of athletic staff turnover across sports departments. Just two weeks after the close of the first investigation, former athletic director Bernard Muir resigned. One month later, former head football coach Troy Taylor was fired due to an investigation into his bullying of female athletic staffers.
Another participant in the investigation who chose to remain anonymous due to fear of retaliation raised questions about the independence of the investigators hired for both investigations. The initial abuse investigation was conducted by a law school friend of Stanford’s Deputy General Counsel. The ongoing investigation is being conducted a former attorney at Stanford’s Office of the General Counsel until 2024.
“It is difficult to think of an independent investigator that could be less independent than one who was a senior internal lawyer in Stanford’s Office of General Counsel until last year and worked for Stanford for five of the last 10 years,” the investigation participant said.
According to a parent letter written to the University, Flacks allegedly obtained confidential information from the first investigation’s reports, including information about which players took part in the first investigation. These players were promised confidentiality by the University.
The University and Flacks’ attorney denied this claim. In a statement to The Daily, the University wrote that they “did not provide a copy of the report” to Flacks.
In a letter to the University used in the first investigation, parents also accused Flacks instructing the players to take the 2023 Anonymous Annual Survey, where athletes provide feedback on their athletic experience, in the presence of the coach. The letter further alleged that players were warned not to give negative feedback and were told to conduct the survey with Flacks in the room.
A source close to Flacks who chose to remain anonymous due to the ongoing investigation called the claim “absolutely false.”
“In at least one [call with a parent], Coach Flacks represented that the Athletic Director told him his job was secure as long as the student-athletes were happy [sic]. To assure the parents that the student-athletes were happy, Coach Flacks further represented that the most recent Annual Survey of feedback from the student-athletes was the best one in 22 years,” a parent of a player wrote in a letter to the University.
In an email to a parent reviewed by The Daily, Stanford’s assistant vice president for employee and labor relations Phung Truong wrote that she did not believe the survey would be conducted in 2024.
At least one player removed himself from the team due to the alleged hostile environment created by Flacks, according to March 30 letters to University administration and athletic directors that have been reviewed by The Daily. The University denied comment on this matter, citing the ongoing investigation.
“How many more need to be driven out, silenced, or retaliated against before Stanford takes action? These high achieving student-athletes deserve better. It’s time to acknowledge the hiring mistake — no one gets it right 100% of the time. It’s time for real accountability and leadership that reflects the values of Stanford: integrity, experience, and respect. These student-athletes deserve a coach who meets the highest standard — not one who undermines their well-being,” one of the investigation participants wrote in an email to The Daily.
Players and their families are still participating in interviews for the ongoing investigation.
This article has been updated to reflect that in addition to the student letters of support, 30 parents of players also signed a letter of support for Flacks.
This article has been updated to better reflect the content and the dates of the letters sent by parents to the University, as well as the timeline of the University’s second investigation. It has also been updated to include the timing of the Anonymous Annual Survey and to better reflect the information allegedly distributed regarding the initial investigation.
