Jimmy Barbarise was made for this.

The pride of Centereach, creator and star of the hit mob show “Capo: Rise to Power,” was named the first Long Island University women’s flag football coach ahead of the Sharks’ inaugural season.

“The beauty of being the executive producer is that I can fit this into my schedule,” Barbarise, an LI flag football hall of fame inductee, told The Post.

“I’ve been asked to be on some other shows, some major shows. I politely turned them down because of the fact that coaching is really important to me.”

The local legend, who led the University of Tampa team to a top-three nationwide ranking, said he turned down five other offers so that he could return to LI from the Sunshine State.

“What would be a better opportunity than to go back home and coach the first D-I school offering women’s football on the island? It was just a perfect match,” said Jimmy the coach, who wrote alternate endings to “The Godfather” as a boy.

Barbarise’s late brother, who died of cancer nearly a decade ago, reminded him of the boyhood passion not just for the silver screen but also his love for flag football that began at age 10.

“He said, ‘There’s no tomorrow for me, but you’ve always had a dream,’ ” Barbarise said. “He encouraged me to go chase that.”

The next step is to build a powerhouse roster, which should come naturally on Long Island given the area’s growing reputation as a flag football powerhouse at the high school level.

“I’m already inundated with inboxes and the announcement isn’t even a week old. … I have hundreds of messages from girls who want to stay home [on Long Island] and play flag on the college level.”

NIL deal for teen soccer star

She’s the biggest thing in Syosset since Natalie Portman.

Soccer phenom Loradana Paletta just inked her first name, image, and likeness (NIL) deal at the ripe old age of 14.

The midfielder, who plays on the U.S. Soccer under-16 girls national team and the NYCFC youth under-14 academy boys team, now proudly represents the Italian sportswear brand Lotto as she continues to strive for greatness on the North Shore.

“This just feels really natural,” Paletta, proudly of Italian descent, told The Post.

“Once a year, my family has one special day just to make tomato sauce — homemade tomato sauce. We would gather buckets of tomatoes, we would clean them, and we all would spend quality time together.”

Although the Syosset High School-bound ninth-grader won’t be able to play varsity due to her other pressing athletic commitments, she’s all for rooting on the girls in red.

“I’d love to give them pointers here and there, and I would definitely go and watch their games.”

There were times during his days at Mississippi State and Florida when UNLV coach Dan Mullen would host parties at his house for his freshman class.

Mullen would look around the backyard and think about how good the group would be after playing together for three or four years.

Now that he’s back on the sidelines in a new era of college football, Mullen may instead look around and wonder how many of those players will still be on his team the following season.

The landscape has changed dramatically the last few years with relaxed transfer rules, the proliferation of name, image and likeness deals and now revenue sharing with athletes.

Mullen watched most of those developments happen from afar as a television analyst, leading him to believe he has a good understanding of what he’s walking into.

“I think being away from it helped rather than being in it,” Mullen said Thursday during Mountain West media days at Circa. “Talking to some coaches, it gets changed from one year to the next to the next and they’re always constantly changing and I kind of let a lot of the change happen and got to see that from a 30,000-foot view and kind of get to grips with where it is and how we’d have to adjust and change our program in the new world of college football.”

The landscape shifted again not long after Mullen took the UNLV job in December. The House vs. NCAA settlement that was approved in June allows schools to pay their athletes directly.

“It’s always changing,” Mullen said. “I think it was all in the foundation stages when I left, but coming back to it, you just kind of have to look at it as the program is the program. Your program and what you do on the field and in the building is not going to change as the head coach, other than not really having that thought about developing your team for three years out when half your roster is going to be all new every season.

“I think that is such a major change, even more than where the NIL money is coming from and the league and the transition and how it’s going to be administratively done. I think we’ll adapt to that other stuff pretty easily.”

UNLV ‘confident’ in plan

UNLV athletic director Erick Harper will be tasked with managing a lot of that change.

He acknowledged there may still be more questions than answers about how to handle the new rules. But he believes the Rebels are prepared for the new era.

“I’m very confident,” Harper said. “Anybody who says they’ve got it all figured out is full of it because we will still be trying to figure it out a year from now and a year from then.”

Things may take another dramatic turn sooner than later.

More litigation is expected. There is already a dispute between the parties involved in the House settlement about whether NIL deals done through collectives should still be allowed moving forward.

“It’s been fast and furious,” Mountain West commissioner Gloria Nevarez said. “Certainly I agree that the House settlement is a good set of parameters, but it’s going to be a bumpy road. We’ve only lived in it for a few weeks and we’re already hearing stories about tampering and deals not being approved. There is a growth period, but I’m optimistic this sets us up to have a more stable environment than the wild, wild west we’ve been living in.”

Politicians may get involved soon as well. President Donald Trump is considering an executive order that could set a national standard for college athletics going forward.

“The important part is when you look at the landscape of college athletics right now is that you have to have a large level of flexibility and be able to understand that this is fluid,” Harper said. “If you’re cooking one way today, you might be cooking another way tomorrow. But you’re trying to arrive at the same conclusion at the end of the day and that’s to take care of the student athletes.”

‘Have to get a hold of it’

There are no easy solutions.

Hawaii coach Timmy Chang, a former star quarterback, believes more adjustments are necessary.

He said the current transfer rules and payment system are like NFL free agency, except colleges also have to deal with admissions offices and class schedules.

“I don’t think we in college football have wrapped our heads around a conclusion where it works best for us,” Chang said. “We probably have to get a hold of it fast.”

Chang said some kids are being taken advantage of with all the backroom dealing going on. They’re getting promised things that aren’t ultimately delivered.

He hopes all levels of college football will give input on potential solutions, instead of the top programs making decisions for everybody.

“Everybody is trying to figure it out,” Chang said. “What I hope is the guys making decisions at the top think about everyone, not just those at the top of the food chain.”

Focus on the field

Most Mountain West players said while they are thrilled to be able to earn more money, their focus remains on the field.

“It’s a thing where you like it because it’s revenue sharing and we’re finally getting this great opportunity, but you don’t want to get your head too buried in it,” Boise State offensive lineman Kage Casey said. “We’re here to play football and that’s where I want to focus my time. I don’t want to be going to photo shoots or appearances every day or taking meetings with someone that I may possibly be able to do an NIL deal with.”

Nevarez doesn’t believe college football is facing an existential crisis. Yet.

“I don’t even know what’s next,” Nevarez said. “But I do think if we can hit the implementation (of the clearinghouse) NIL Go and revenue sharing and all the parameters created by the House settlement in even stride and get comfortable there, I think we have a good shot of keeping college athletics going.”

Contact Adam Hill at ahill@reviewjournal.com. Follow @AdamHillLVRJ on X.

Less than three weeks into the official start of revenue sharing and other House v. NCAA settlement initiatives and there has only been more speculation and questions. Conversations over the future of the sport and NIL have been littered with talks of shady money being thrown around more than ever. The rules are unclear and feature too many workarounds. It appears as if no one fully grasps what is going on, and different actors are trying to maximize what they can do amongst the chaos. While there is so much more to come, here is what we know so far.

[Sign up for Inside Texas for $1 and get PLUS access up to the Ohio State game!]

Schools and those in school ecosystems have been attempting to use a variety of unique workarounds and loopholes to revenue sharing. There is widespread belief that schools are using variations of several tactics. Schools are throwing around “fake money” that they’re not sure they can pay, making offers that would put them way over the revenue sharing cap.

Schools are also still utilizing third-party collectives to pay current players and high school recruits with deals that the NCAA believes are pay-to-play. Collectives are promising NIL deals despite the fact that the NCAA believes those kinds of NIL terms cannot be used as a recruiting inducement and that they don’t serve a necessary “valid business purpose.” Meanwhile, several different state laws allow for high school aged prospects to make money off of NIL in spite of what the NCAA says, and even says the law of the land supersedes the regulations of the NCAA.

RELATED

Schools are also negotiating revenue sharing deals before August 1, the date the NCAA says is the earliest those negotiations can take place. Revenue sharing deals are the result of a term of the House settlement that allows for schools to share up to $20.5 million of revenue with student-athletes.

Beyond this, a select amount of programs had the financial flexibility to anticipate the impacts of revenue sharing and stay ahead of the curve. Collectives that were wealthy and smart enough front-loaded their roster with millions of dollars of third party NIL deals in the spring to pay for this year’s roster. Those schools now now have a massive advantage. By doing this, schools were able to finalize NIL deals with players without having to be processed through NILGo.

And NILGo has created nothing but problems.

NILGo is the Deloitte/College Sports Commission-run clearinghouse that reviews all NIL deals over $600. Over 12,000 athletes and 11,000 school officials have registered. NIL deals must “have valid business purpose,” according to the clearinghouse’s website. NILGo was created by the College Sports Commission as a result of Judge Claudia Wilken’s approval of the House settlement, which refers not to the U.S. House of Representatives but rather Grant House. House was a Division I swimmer at Arizona State University and one of the first athletes to challenge the NCAA’s limits on athlete compensation. His co-plaintiff was former Oregon and TCU basketball player Sedona Prince.

The two newly-created regulatory bodies created by the Power Conferences in the College Sports Commission and NILGo have been extremely slowed down and tied up in legal issues associated with the House settlement. According to Yahoo, the attorneys for House recently sent a letter to the NCAA demanding that they retract the guidance that states third party NIL deals crafted with collectives do not serve a valid business purpose and cannot be approved.

This is the main dispute coming from the CSC and NILGo.

The request to remove the “valid business purpose” language is a telling sign that student-athletes want fewer obstacles toward payments, and also that the NCAA’s efforts to stymie the existence of collectives is an uphill climb. The “valid business purpose” restriction is one that looks like the kind the courts have regularly slapped in litigation involving the NCAA.

One potential obstacle for the student-athletes could be the SCORE Act, which is making its way through the U.S. House of Representatives. The act is seen as a clean-up for college sports in that it provides stability via one system of rules as opposed to varying regulations passed by the different states.

Critics believe that it limits players too much as it restricts their NIL eligibility and provides them with less overall flexibility such as no ability to unionize. However, it is a “student-athlete first” deal in how many protections it provides players such as scholarship and injury protections, healthcare, and agent assistance. It requires schools to offer academic and health support. The SCORE Act also restricts the use of student fees to fund athletics, safeguards smaller athletic programs and Olympic sports, and bans the classification of athletes as employees.

That final piece is significant if you care about college sports remaining unique from professional sports. The act also comes with a great deal of NIL oversight and limited antitrust exemptions for the NCAA. It will also override state NIL law, establishing federal uniformity. That has pros and cons for all parties.

The SCORE Act could be a pivotal shift as it aims to balance order in NIL, athlete protections, and NCAA interests. But it’s still in flux, with big implications for athlete agency, funding models, and the overall economics of collegiate sports. Plus, President Donald Trump is reportedly considering signing an executive order regarding NIL and college sports, which would bring with it a different set of issues.

Texas’ model consolidates brand development, deal execution, and media content under one roof while the Texas One Fund remains a separate entity independent from the university as it tries to craft NIL deals that fit into the limits, if there are any, of the House settlement. Putting brand development on the newly created Longhorn Sports Agency alongside Learfield increases efficiency and control but may consign athletes to a narrower “official” partner pool. Meanwhile, the Texas One Fund allows for Texas to pay its players outside the $20.5 million cap for the entire athletic department via crafting for-profit deals with Austin and Texas based businesses. But as mentioned, collectives and their role are under intense scrutiny.

The early days of revenue-sharing have demonstrated that we are far from stability in college athletics. Legal ambiguity, institutional opportunism, and regulatory delays have created more confusion than clarity. As schools scramble to find advantages within gray areas, it’s clear the landscape is constantly evolving. Even the battlefield where these issues will be decided seems to change from one branch of government to another at a moment’s notice.

[Want to be the most informed Texas Longhorns football fan? Order the 2025 edition of Thinking Texas Football today!]

As the rules get rewritten in real time, schools like Texas are trying to get ahead of the game while some schools are still reacting. As the chaos continues, the need for an enforceable NIL structure has never been more dire. And if not enforceable NIL structure, then something that makes it possible to know what’s legal and what’s not.

Cincinnati volleyball redshirt-freshman Janelle Green came a long way from her slight trepidation in posting her first Instagram reel last year.

Now, with her second season on the Cincinnati volleyball team less than two months away and days after a whirlwind trip to Austin, Texas as a new C4 energy drink ambassador, that initial shock is long gone.

“I only knew about NIL through my two older brothers who played collegiately, and it blew up right between our careers,” Green said. “It’s more something that I do for fun. I enjoy and it’s opened up a lot of great opportunities, but I wouldn’t use it as a characteristic to define myself. I didn’t know much about it going into college. It didn’t weigh any of my decisions of where I was going or what I wanted to do, because volleyball and school were always my priority.”

Green credits Launchpoint, an app that matches athletes with brand deals through self-created videos, as how the C4 process began. 

“I was home in May, and I made a couple of videos with the C4 drinks they sent me for free,” Green said. “I then started pushing more content and taking pictures for them. (Eddie Taylor, Director of NIL & Innovation) was able to put in a good word for me with Launchpoint.

“I didn’t think too much of it, and then all of a sudden, they say ‘hey, do you want to come to Texas? We have a great opportunity.’ I told them ‘absolutely, yes.'”

But here’s the rub: her Kansas City address was registered with them, and she was on her way back to Cincinnati soon after to work out. It turned out to be the best possible lemons-into-lemonade content piece, as her unboxing video instead became her parents doing it for her creating something even more organic and unique.

“It’s really funny and all very authentic,” Green said. “I’m already re-watching it now but it’s literally just my parents, and I like laughing and having fun.”

NIL, as student-athletes from Cincinnati and beyond have realized, is also an incredible tool for relationships beyond campus for professional and social networking. She also earned an invite to C4’s inaugural Field Day in Austin this June, bringing 28 influencers and NIL athletes for a two-day experience designed to showcase the C4 brand, our innovation pipeline and the vibrant culture behind it.

“One of the girls I met lives in Florida and is already planning to come to our road match at UCF,” Green said. “Another couple of people who live in Ohio want to come down one weekend to watch a volleyball game, which I think is super cool. We’ve been checking in to see how our Fourth of July plans went.

There has also been a strong sense of mentorship and teamwork.

“One of the girls is much more of an influencer than me and has that kind of following,” Green said. “We spent what felt like an hour or two talking about how she handles pressure, how did she grow, and what were her thoughts on different things, because I consider myself a baby in those areas. She was very genuine and texted me a week ago to both check in and say she was glad to meet me.”

Cincinnati opens its first season under head coach Danijela Tomic on Friday, Aug. 29 for the Tribute to #10 tournament at Fifth Third Arena, first against Wake Forest followed by Michigan on Sunday.

The “Name, Image, and Likeness” (NIL) revolution has reshaped collegiate athletics. Players have more agency than even to earn their market value, make some of the money they generate for sports programs, and ensure their future even in the event of a catastrophic injury, or a failure to be selected in a pro league draft.

That could potentially change in the near future, courtesy of an executive order filed by President Trump. Front Office Sports reported on Wednesday that Trump is “actively working” on an NIL order, which is expected to either establish NCAA-friendly rules to limit the earning potential of players, or at the least establish a commission to investigate athlete compensation. The end goal in either case would be to support power conference schools in their lobbying goals to limit high-profile players from joining smaller programs due to money.

Advertisement

In addition, legislation would likely put an earning cap on how much players can make through NIL, as well as codify athletes as “non-employees,” something player groups have been pushing for in several states.

This comes following the ruling of House vs. NCAA, a 2020 case settled last year for $2.75B which sought to lift restrictions on revenue sharing from broadcast rights. Congress has been working on its own bill to curb NIL spending, with negotiations ongoing about a proposed cap on NIL payments from schools. It’s unclear what this amount would be, but it’s accepted it would be substantially less that what programs are currently spending.

It comes in the wake of notable collegiate sports figures like Nick Saban decrying the explosion of NIL-based payments, and speaking to the president about his concerns. It should be noted that while Alabama (Saban’s former team) remains a powerhouse in college football, their NIL kitty is substantially lower than a wide array of schools, ranking 12th in future NIL investment, behind the likes of Auburn, LSU, Texas, and Georgia — among others.

The impetus behind legislation appears from the outside like sour grapes. Traditional powerhouses are losing their recruiting edge by not being able to keep up with NIL spending, lessening the amount of high-profile four, and five-star recruits coming to campus. This would fundamentally represent a power shift in football from a talent perspective, with ACC schools Virginia, Florida State, Clemson, Louisville, and North Carolina having much larger NIL commitments than numerous power conference schools.

Advertisement

It’s unclear at this time what a Trump order would look like, though it’s widely accepted it would be fundamentally worse for players and better for institutions when it comes to a revenue share.

Nothing says “free marketplace” quite like governmental intervention.