Rec Sports
Angry Parents Turning Little League Baseball into Battlefields of Poor Sportsmanship
Can You Believe It?
The uptick in abuse against umpires and referees in youth sports, including Little League baseball, continues to have a dramatic impact. There is a nationwide umpire shortage. Many umpires retired during the pandemic, but others have just had enough.
“It is extremely sad to see because it takes away from the game. It is something children should not have to see. And it sometimes makes the kids emulate their parents’ aggressive action on the playing fields,’’ said Horton Webb, a retired 20-year veteran of youth sports from Waynesburg, Pa. “It is just not safe to be an umpire or referee in any youth sport right now,’’ said Webb, who suffered a broken jaw last summer from an irate parent before quitting.
Since 2017, the number of baseball and softball umpires in the Babe Ruth youth baseball and softball league has been in decline – with 6,229 in 2017 falling to 4,995, according to the National Umpire Association. Between 2018 and 2022, youth sports lost nearly 20,000 umpires at the high school level, according to the National Federation of State High School Associations.
Videos of parents and coaches verbally and physically assaulting umpires have gone viral. In one Little League game in Alabama, a coach is seen grabbing an umpire and throwing him to the ground, with children looking on in disbelief.
Another video shows Texas parents aggressively yelling at an umpire, who ended the game early over the disruption. And a recent survey of youth sport officials by the National Federation of State High School Association, found that 59 percent of umpires and referees don’t feel respected by parents and spectators. During a recent youth baseball game in Lakewood, Colorado, parents disagreed with an umpire’s call and stormed the field. Parents and spectators starting punching each other as 7-year-old players looked on. The association also predicts that 82 percent of current umpires will retire or quit because of unsafe working conditions.
Tim White of Taunton, Mass., said parents threatened to beat him up in a parking lot after a Little League game. “It is simply out of control,’’ he said. The parents disliked his home plate call.
“These acts of violence should not surprise us,’’ said Paula Calabrese, a Pittsburgh-based consultant. “People are angry; it’s life on high volume,’’ she said. “We need to communicate acceptable standards of behavior and be responsible for our actions,’’ said Calabrese.
Already a handful of states, including Florida, Delaware, Hawaii, Georgia, California and Illinois, have established laws to protect umpires. And Little League Baseball and Softball updated the Child Protection Program prior to the 2022 season, which includes an added section on bullying and emotional wellness. The policy was updated to provide guidance to leagues on how to prevent bullying in their program while promoting emotional wellness for players. Little League has zero tolerance for the following behaviors: physical bullying, verbal bullying, emotional bullying, social and cyber bullying, harassment, and hazing.
Any individual that engages in any of the above behaviors or commits violence should be prohibited from participating in Little League. This includes player-to-player, player-to-adult, adult-to-player and adult-to-adult interactions. And if a situation occurs at a Little League event, including practices and games, both parties should be removed from the games until the issues are resolved, according to the Little League Child Protection program..
Kelly Cooke said Little League baseball has been an excellent experience for her 11-year-old son, Malachi. “He is learning leadership skills and self-discipline,” said Cooke, whose son often plays pitcher and catcher with the Squirrel Hill Little League team in Pittsburgh, Pa.
“We are a closely knit group with no tolerance for violence,’’ Cooke said. “Kids will be benched if they do not follow good sportsmanship rules,” she said.
With two million active players annually, Little League baseball is the largest youth sports organization in the world. There are more than 200,000 Little League teams nationwide.
,
Link
Rec Sports
Potomac Falls graduate Jalen Coker emerges as needed reliable No. 2 wide receiver for Bryce Young in Carolina | Sports
Rec Sports
US supreme court considers state bans on transgender athletes in school sports – live | US supreme court
US supreme court considers state bans on transgender athletes in school sports
Sam Levin
The US supreme court is considering the rights of transgender youth athletes on Tuesday in a major hearing on state laws banning trans girls from girls sports teams.
Oral arguments center on two cases of trans students who sued over the Republican-backed laws in Idaho and West Virginia prohibiting them from participating in girls athletic programs. The cases could have far-reaching implications for civil rights, with a ruling against the athletes potentially eroding a range of protections for trans youth and LGBTQ+ people more broadly.
In West Virginia v BPJ, 15-year-old Becky Pepper-Jackson challenged the state’s 2021 law banning her from track. A federal court blocked the ban, but the state appealed to the supreme court.
In the second case, Little v Hecox, Lindsay Hecox, a trans college student pursuing track, sued to overturn Idaho’s first-in-the-nation 2020 law categorically banning trans women and girls from women’s sports teams. She has since pushed to have the case dismissed, saying she is not doing sports in college and doesn’t want further harassment, but the supreme court is still hearing the matter.
Twenty-seven states have now restricted trans youth access to school sports – most with laws targeting trans girls, but some applying to all trans youth. Defenders of the bans argue they are promoting fairness and safety in women’s sports, while trans rights advocates counter the laws are cruel and discriminatory, and that there’s no credible evidence inclusive sports policies have endangered cis girls and women.
We’ll bring you all the latest from inside and outside the court as we get it.
Key events
Block argued that Pepper-Jackson has no physiological / competitive advantage, given that she had been through female puberty.
The purpose of sex separation is to control for the sex-based differential that comes through puberty. By virtue of her medical care, BPJ has controlled for those sex-based advantages.
Joshua Block, an attorney for the American Civil Liberties Union, is now arguing on behalf of Becky Pepper-Jackson.
Chief Justice John Roberts questioned whether the court’s landmark 2020 finding that federal law protects transgender people from workplace discrimination also applies to women’s sports.
Roberts sided with the majority in that decision, but indicated that the reasoning might not apply in this case.
The question here is whether or not a sex-based classification is necessarily a transgender classification.
Trans youth athletes speak out: ‘Sports is my everything’
In the lead up to today’s oral arguments, we spoke with trans youth athletes and their families about the role of sports in their lives and the toll of exclusionary policies.
Here are clips from interviews with three students:
More from those conversations here:
Hashim Mooppan is now arguing for the Trump administration for the second time today, this time in support of West Virginia’s state law.
In his opening statement, Williams said:
The law is indifferent to gender identity because sports are indifferent to gender identity.
He also argued that transgender girls have inherent biological advantages, though Pepper-Jackson’s lawyers have said that she does not because of puberty-blocking medications.
The 15-year-old is the only known transgender student-athlete seeking to compete in the state.
Lex McMenamin
Outside the supreme court, the crowd on both sides has slowly started dissipating, particularly the anti-trans side, though speakers continue.
On the anti-trans side to the right, speakers can be heard arguing that gender is biologically constructed; much of the rhetoric is focused on calling trans women “men” and claiming they are “male athletes”.
To the left, a group of West Virginians who traveled by bus to DC are telling the crowd they stand with Becky Pepper-Jackson: “[US senator] Jim Justice doesn’t speak for West Virginia.”
In his opening remarks, West Virginia’s solicitor general Michael Williams said that the state legislature “reasonably and rationally defined sex based on biology and acknowledged the physical differences biology creates”.
He argued that this “preserves the enduring structure on which girls’ sports depends”.
Arguments in Idaho case end as court moves on to West Virginia challenge
The arguments in the first case have now ended, justices are now hearing arguments in a challenge to a West Virginia law by high school student Becky Pepper-Jackson (she was in middle school when the case began).
And conservative justice Amy Coney Barrett asked Harnett how she can argue that there is discrimination based on transgender status when anyone, including transgender boys, can play on boys’ sports teams under the Idaho law, meaning only trans girls are affected.
Hartnett said the court has not required the entire protected class to be excluded in other similar cases, and reiterated that her case focuses on a specific subgroup targeted by the law.
Here’s a story you’ve probably heard before:
A new youth sports complex opens on the edge of town. Ten or twelve pristine fields. Acres of parking. A name that signals ambition… Regional, Legacy, Premier. On weekends, the place is packed with tournament traffic: minivans, tents, folding chairs, vendors. On weekdays, it sits largely empty. At the same time, closer to the city’s core, school fields are locked after hours. Park courts lack lights. Neighborhoods dense with children and young adults have no playable space within walking distance.
This coexistence (abundance on the outskirts, scarcity at the center) does not feel accidental. It’s the result of a set of incentives that consistently push cities toward large, centralized sports complexes rather than small, distributed neighborhood fields.
The question is not whether these complexes “work.” Many of them do exactly what they are designed to do. The question is what problem they are actually solving.
Large sports complexes are attractive to city governments because they are easy to explain. They arrive with economic impact studies attached: hotel nights, restaurant spending, regional visitors. They come with clear capital budgets, naming rights, and ribbon-cutting ceremonies. They can be photographed from the air and branded as evidence of investment. A $30 million complex feels like progress because it is visible.
Neighborhood fields, by contrast, don’t always photograph well. A lit mini-pitch on a residential block looks like maintenance instead of transformation. Ten small investments scattered across a city do not produce a single moment of political credit in the way one large facility does.
In the end, cities are not only responding to community need; they are responding to the logic of governance. Centralized projects are legible to councils, donors, and the press. Distributed infrastructure is quieter and harder to narrate. The result is predictable: cities optimize for visibility rather than proximity.
Beyond politics, sports complexes solve a series of administrative challenges. They centralize scheduling, liability, maintenance, and security. They allow recreation departments to manage sport as a contained activity rather than a diffuse one. Insurance is simpler, permitting clearer, and staff can be concentrated in one place.
Neighborhood fields demand something different. They require tolerance for informal use. They require shared ownership and ambiguity. They invite unscheduled play, mixed ages, and overlapping activities. They make risk harder to quantify and control.
Over time, American cities have made a quiet tradeoff: In the name of safety, efficiency, and liability management, they have narrowed the conditions under which play is allowed to happen. Locked school fields are the clearest example. Publicly funded land—arguably the most evenly distributed athletic infrastructure in the country—is increasingly inaccessible outside of sanctioned hours for certain groups. What once functioned as a neighborhood commons now operates as a reserved facility.
This is not some sort of conspiracy; it is a cumulative effect of policy choices that privilege order over use. In any case, the outcome is the same: informal play disappears, not because people stopped wanting it, but because cities stopped permitting it.
Sports complexes are often defended as “for the kids”, which is true, but incomplete. They are for a specific kind of kid: one whose family has transportation, flexible weekends, and the means to pay tournament and registration fees. They are for teams already inside organized systems.
A facility located thirty minutes from most neighborhoods, designed around weekend tournaments, implicitly excludes:
- children who rely on public transit
- adults who work nonstandard hours
- people seeking casual, after-work play
- families for whom sport is not a full-time logistical project
By contrast, neighborhood fields, especially when lit and unlocked, serve a much broader population. They support:
- spontaneous play
- intergenerational use
- adult recreation
- repeated, low-pressure participation
The difference is not simply access, but frequency. A child who can play three nights a week within walking distance accumulates far more meaningful engagement than one who plays once a week at a distant complex.
Complexes maximize peak usage. Neighborhood fields maximize lifetime usage. Cities tend to choose the former.
One reason this pattern persists is scale. A single large complex carries a large price tag, which paradoxically makes it easier to justify. It feels like a serious investment and a line item that commands attention. Distributed infrastructure does not. Ten $1 million neighborhood projects feel incremental rather than transformative, even if they serve more people more often. Maintenance budgets are harder to celebrate than capital expenditures.
Yet from a public-health and civic perspective, the return on neighborhood infrastructure is often higher. A small field used daily by dozens of people across age groups produces more cumulative hours of movement, social contact, and belonging than a complex used intensely but intermittently. The problem is not that cities lack resources. It is that they measure success at the wrong scale.
This is not an abstract critique. Other cities offer concrete alternatives. In the Paris suburbs, municipal pitches are embedded directly into residential neighborhoods. These are not elite facilities. They are durable, visible, and permissive. Community tournaments like the Coupe d’Aulnay use public fields to create large-scale civic events without privatizing space. In Medellín, small neighborhood courts—canchas de barrio—were built deliberately as tools of violence reduction and social cohesion. Lighting, visibility, and accessibility mattered more than surface quality. These spaces became anchors of daily life, not destinations.
Even within the United States, basketball provides a telling comparison. For much of the twentieth century, cities invested heavily in outdoor courts. These were cheap, ubiquitous, and politically uncontroversial. They produced a culture of pickup play that persists decades later. Basketball did not become a public language because of professional leagues alone. It became a public language because cities made it unavoidable.
Soccer, by contrast, was routed into complexes and clubs. This difference was not inevitable. It was designed. So… what would change if cities asked a different question?
Instead of: How do we host more tournaments?
Ask: Can a twelve-year-old play within a ten-minute walk of home, three nights a week?
Instead of: How do we attract regional events?
Ask: Where do adults play after work without registering, paying, or driving across town?
These questions point toward a different set of investments:
- lighting instead of fencing
- unlocked gates instead of reservation systems
- durable surfaces instead of showcase turf
- policy that tolerates informal use rather than suppressing it
The most powerful sports infrastructure is not the kind people travel to; it’s the kind they stop noticing because it is always there.
Cities keep building sports complexes not because they are the best way to create access, but because they are the easiest way to demonstrate investment. They are legible, controllable, and photogenic. Neighborhood fields are none of those things. They are messy. They are dispersed. They blur the line between program and public life… But they do something complexes cannot.
They turn play into a daily practice rather than a scheduled event. They allow sport to function as civic infrastructure rather than consumer experience. American cities do not lack ambition when it comes to sports. They lack imagination about scale.
Ultimately, the choice is not between excellence and access. it’s between building for moments and building for lives. If cities want sport to serve public health, belonging, and community—rather than only weekends and tournaments—they will need fewer showcases and more spaces where nothing is scheduled, and everything is possible.
[[divider]]
This article was originally published, in slightly different form, on Noah Toumert’s The People’s Pitch. It is shared here with permission.
In the pursuit of easier maintenance and year-round playability, Palo Alto officials approved installing new artificial turf at the El Camino Park playing fields Monday night, concluding, at least for now, the prolonged debate that pit environmentalists against soccer players and their coaches.
However, the approved fields look a bit different than the ones that were proposed before the City Council in November. That’s because a council ad hoc committee was tasked with learning more about the technology and risks associated with synthetic turf, and recommended a natural cork infill as opposed to the typical rubber pellets. The goal of the cork infill is to reduce the amount of plastic as well as the surface temperature of the fields, which tend to develop heat islands during warmer weather. Other risk mitigation efforts include annual testing and site-specific filtration to limit the plastic runoff into stormwater drains.
“There was just no way to replace the El Camino fields with grass without displacing huge numbers of players,” said Mayor Vicki Veenker, who served on the ad hoc committee.
It only took a consultant study, two Parks and Recreation Commission discussions, two council discussions, and a specially appointed council hoc committee to decide which material the city should use to resurface the El Camino turf fields, which are reaching the end of their usable life. The ad hoc committee was formed at the end of a lengthy discussion on Nov. 17, when instead of taking a vote, the council deferred the decision yet again
Council members Julie Lythcott-Haims, Keith Reckdahl and George Lu were ready that night to go with the committee and consultant recommendation of synthetic turf — but their three votes were not enough to muster a majority. Instead, then-Vice Mayor Veenker, then-Mayor Ed Lauing and Council member Pat Burt joined the ad hoc committee to further review the issue.
The committee’s meetings were not publicly available, but a staff report summarizing the discussion took care to emphasize the greater number of playable hours offered by synthetic turf compared to natural grass. According to the staff report, a natural grass replacement could displace more than 1,000 players annually due to winter weather rendering the grass unplayable.
While the consultant study and the Parks and Recreation Commission both recommended artificial turf as the best option for El Camino, the City Council initially appeared keen to heed the warnings of environmental advocates who raised concerns about microplastics and forever chemicals. They have argued before the council several times that the increased playability of synthetic turf — or “plastic carpet,” as some call it — is not worth the environmental contamination.
Advocates have also taken issue with the consultant study upon which city officials have relied to make their decision, saying that it exaggerates the playable hours of turf and minimizes the long-term costs and risks of playing on plastic. Some argued that the city does not truly understand the hazards of synthetic turf. Claire Elliott, an ecologist who lives in Ventura, urged the council to formally reject the consultant study that recommended turf.
“I am frankly dismayed that we are still considering plastic-coating our parks with this material,” Elliott said. “It’s really not an environmentally sound decision and I think of Palo Alto being a city that generally makes environmentally sound decisions, so it’s disappointing.”
Even at just one minute per speaker, the public comment portion of the meeting took close to an hour, with 42 people (and more than a few youth soccer players) lined up in the council chambers and on Zoom to offer their support or condemnation of synthetic turf fields.
Speakers who have opposed turf previously were not satisfied with the risk mitigation efforts proposed by the ad hoc committee, arguing that “better plastic” is still plastic at the end of the day.
The back-and-forth also got testier on Monday night compared to previous meetings, with several residents addressing other speakers directly instead of the council.
“To the patronizing speakers who think that we’re too dumb to understand this, I’m a professor in public health, and look how healthy the soccer players look versus the people who spoke against the soccer fields,” said Adam Olshen, who spoke in favor of synthetic turf.
While the rest of the council was persuaded by the upgraded synthetic turf option, Vice Mayor Greer Stone found himself as the sole no vote. He acknowledged this fact on the dais, but said the health risks described by the Santa Clara County Medical Association were too great to vote in favor of synthetic turf.
“I think it’s a false choice to say that we’re choosing synthetic turf and then youth sports, or if we choose natural grass we are voting against youth sports,” Stone said. “Sports will continue; I think we can find better ways to create access to it.”
Stone added that he hopes the resurfacing of the El Camino fields will be the last time synthetic turf is used in Palo Alto.
The council’s motion leaves room to pursue a natural grass pilot elsewhere in the city, with fields at Greer Park and Cubberley Community Center floated as options. The motion also makes explicit reference to transitioning the Cubberley synthetic fields to natural grass when they are due for resurfacing in 2028.
“We don’t have time to go through that (natural turf) learning curve while the kids are sitting there waiting for the grass to grow,” Reckdahl said. “I think in the short term, we unfortunately have no option but to go to the artificial turf field.”
Rec Sports
AUSL’s 2026 host cities unveiled as league achieves national footprint with coast-to-coast reach
Following a breakout inaugural season that captivated fans nationwide, the Athletes Unlimited Softball League (AUSL), today announced the host cities and venues for its teams beginning with the 2026 season, marking a watershed moment for the league and for professional softball.
With teams spanning six Top 50 U.S. media markets and two of the nation’s leading innovation hubs and fastest-growing cities, the announcement cements AUSL’s transition to a fully city-based league and reflects the widespread resonance of softball across the United States. In addition, AUSL’s national reach allows the league to authentically connect with fans across diverse regions and communities. Collectively, these markets significantly over-index in Millennial and Gen Z populations, women-led and college educated households, and youth sports participation – all audiences that are shaping the future of professional women’s sports fandom.
This milestone builds on a historic inaugural season fueled by sellout crowds, record viewership and social engagement, a strategic investment by Major League Baseball, expansion to six teams, and a multi-year media rights renewal with ESPN.
After evaluating numerous potential markets against a comprehensive set of criteria, each AUSL host city was ultimately selected for its authentic connection to softball, demonstrated support for women’s sports, access to professional-caliber facilities and ability to serve as a long-term home for professional teams. Together, these markets reflect the nationwide resonance of softball and AUSL’s commitment to building a league rooted in community, culture, and competitive excellence.
The six teams and their home venues are:
The Carolinas have produced generations of elite softball talent, and Durham sits at the heart of that tradition. With a strong youth pipeline and a deep appreciation for high-level competition, the region offers an ideal home for the Blaze.
Duke University Softball Stadium provides a premier venue where the Blaze can connect with fans who value the growth and development of women’s sports. With former Duke standouts Ana Gold and Jala Wright on the roster, the Blaze reflect the pride and passion of Carolina softball.
Chicago is one of the most passionate and knowledgeable softball markets in the country, and the birthplace of the sport itself. The return of the Bandits brand represents both a homecoming and a new chapter, blending deep regional roots with the future of professional softball.
Rosemont has served as the home of Athletes Unlimited Softball since its 2020 inception and offers an outstanding, centrally located venue for Midwest fans. Chicago is the ideal market to build the next era of professional softball, honoring tradition while pushing the sport forward.
Oklahoma stands as one of the most influential softball markets in the world, with a rich culture spanning youth, collegiate, and national levels. As the home of USA Softball and the Softball Hall of Fame, Oklahoma City represents the heart of the sport.
The University of Oklahoma’s storied softball history and the city’s growing appetite for women’s professional sports make Oklahoma City a cornerstone market for AUSL. Announced as the league’s first city and joining in late 2025, the Spark deepen AUSL’s central U.S. footprint while connecting with a passionate fan base. The return of hometown favorites Kinzie Hansen, Haley Lee and Sydney Romero further strengthens that bond.
The Pacific Northwest has consistently led the way in supporting women’s sports, and Portland stands as the epicenter of that movement. The city offers a community that embraces innovation, inclusion, and high-level competition—making it a natural fit for AUSL and its athletes.
With a passionate fan base and a strong softball culture, the Cascade will thrive in a region where women’s sports are celebrated year-round. The presence of Pacific Northwest standouts Sis Bates and Paige Sinicki further deepens the connection between the team and its fans.
Texas is synonymous with softball excellence at every level, and the Volts’ home reflects that legacy. Strong fan support during AUSL games last summer confirmed the region’s appetite for elite professional softball, while the fast-growing women’s sports community provides a powerful platform for long-term growth.
Dell Diamond offers a world-class venue and fan experience, and AUSL is proud to partner with Reid Ryan and his team to establish a premier destination for the Volts. With Texas legends including GM Cat Osterman, Head Coach Ricci Woodard and recent Longhorn standout Mia Scott, the Volts are anchored in a region that lives and breathes the sport.
Salt Lake City has emerged as a dynamic sports market with a strong youth softball foundation and growing enthusiasm for women’s professional sports. Following sellout crowds during last season’s series, the Talons return as the reigning AUSL champions, bringing momentum and excitement to the Mountain West.
The University of Utah provides an exceptional setting for the Talons and for league expansion in the region. Led by hometown hero Hannah Flippen, the Talons are deeply connected to the community they represent.
“These host cities represent the next major chapter of the AUSL’s growth,” said Kim Ng, Commissioner of the Athletes Unlimited Softball League. “We are building on the momentum of an historic inaugural season by establishing franchises in markets with strong softball traditions, proven fan engagement, and the infrastructure to support a world-class professional experience. This is about creating lasting connections between our athletes, our teams, and the communities they represent, and setting up the sport of softball for long-term success at the professional level.”
The 2026 AUSL regular season will begin June 9 with an Opening Day featuring all 6 teams – the Utah Talons hosting the Chicago Bandits, the Carolina Blaze hosting the Portland Cascade and the Oklahoma City Spark hosting the Texas Volts. The full 2026 schedule can be found below. At www.theAUSL.com, fans can become Founding Season Ticket Members for any of the six teams beginning today at 12:00pm ET*.* Group tickets for all games are also available. Single game tickets will be available at a later date.
The AUSL playoff format will expand to include a play-in game between the second- and third-ranked teams, with the top performing team earning a bye into the best-of-three AUSL Championship. The AUSL Championship and play-in game will take place at a neutral site, to be announced at a later date. Following the AUSL Championship, a select group of players will be chosen to compete in the AUSL All-Star Cup, a high-stakes showdown held in Rosemont to crown the ultimate individual softball champion utilizing the innovative Athletes Unlimited format.
Earlier this offseason, AUSL announced a veteran leadership group of General Managers and Head Coaches across its six teams, a collective that brings six Olympic medals, 17 NCAA championships as players and coaches, and 17 NCAA All-American honors to the league. The league’s original teams — the Bandits, Blaze, Talons, and Volts — will be joined by expansion teams OKC Spark and Portland Cascade, forming a six-team league that will compete beginning in 2026.
Last month, AUSL also completed its 2026 player acquisition process with a two-part Draft that aired live on ESPNU. The Draft opened with an Expansion Draft, allowing the OKC Spark and Portland Cascade to establish their rosters, followed by an Allocation Draft in which all six teams selected from a wider pool of professional athletes. In the spring, remaining roster spots will be filled through the AUSL College Draft, with selected NCAA athletes receiving Golden Tickets to join the league.
Earlier this offseason, Athletes Unlimited and ESPN announced a multi-year media rights extension that will make ESPN an official broadcast partner of the Athletes Unlimited Softball League beginning in 2026. Under the three-year agreement, ESPN will carry 50 exclusive AUSL games annually, including 47 regular season contests and the best-of-three AUSL Championship Series. Coverage will span ESPN platforms and include a marquee game on ABC — marking the first time professional softball will air on broadcast television in the United States.
On May 29, 2025, MLB announced a strategic investment in the AUSL, marking a first-of-its-kind, comprehensive partnership with a women’s professional sports league to help establish and grow the AUSL as a sustainable organization. As a part of MLB’s ongoing commitment to supporting the growth of softball at all levels, MLB will work collaboratively
University Heights, OH — The University of Pittsburgh at Bradford women’s basketball team had a tough challenge on Monday evening as they headed to John Carroll to face the 10th-ranked Blue Streaks. The Panthers struggled to keep up with John Carroll and fell 112-41.
The Panthers started fast, matching John Carroll’s five early points with a three-pointer by Amber Murak and a jumper from Ella Gettings. Unfortunately, they were unable to keep pace after the Gettings bucket, and the Blue Streaks rolled off 10 straight points. Murak ended the run with a layup, but it was followed by another Pitt-Bradford scoring draught that saw John Carroll push their lead to 16. Murak and Zennette Zigler combined for three free throws in the last few minutes, while their effort was matched by the hosts, who finished the period with a 31-10 lead.
John Carroll opened the second with a 9-0 run before Murak got the Panthers on the board with a pair of free throws. Gettings made a short jumper with 4:15 left in the half, ending an 11-minute drought from the field. It was in the midst of an 18-4 run that also included two free throws by Raquel Sewell. Dalayla Alexander added a late jumper, but the hosts hit two more three-pointers in the final minute to send the game to the break with Pitt-Bradford trailing 64-18.
The hosts continued their run as the 2nd half began, scoring the first 10 points of the 3rd quarter. Murak stopped another run with a driving layup. It started the Panthers’ best offensive stretch of the game, as a minute later, they scored on three straight possessions. A Murak layup was followed by an Alexander three and a tip-in from Sewell. Alexander added another layup in the quarter, but the Blue Streaks closed with a 7-0 run to end the quarter.
The Panthers were able to score first in the fourth as Alexander made a jumper in the lane on Pitt-Bradford’s second possession. Murak added two more layups and a three-pointer in the quarter. Abigail Goss closed the game with two free throws, putting the final score at 112-41.
Amber Murak led all scorers in the game with 19 points. Dalayla Alexander added 9 points, while also tallying 4 rebounds and 2 steals. Raquel Sewell and Zennette Zigler each grabbed 7 rebounds in the loss.
Pitt-Bradford falls to 0-12 on the season with the loss. The Panthers will be back in action on Thursday, when they return to AMCC play with a home matchup against Alfred State. Tipoff is set for 7:00 p.m., and the game will include a halftime game played by teams from the Bradford Youth Girls Basketball League.
Potomac Falls graduate Jalen Coker emerges as needed reliable No. 2 wide receiver for Bryce Young in Carolina | Sports
US supreme court considers state bans on transgender athletes in school sports – live | US supreme court
Volleyball Graduates Reinhardt & Martin Earn Academic All-America Honors
Flying Lizard Motorsports’ Darren Law Steps Out of Driving Retirement for Daytona Return with Vintage Racing Company
Why Do Cities Build Sports Complexes Instead of Neighborhood Fields?
Indiana football roster too old? No, Hoosiers just have better players
Gaston Represents UIndy as Allstate NACDA Good Works Team Nominee
Turf defeats grass in El Camino Park showdown
UNI volleyball: Hartman earns CSC Academic All-American status
AUSL’s 2026 host cities unveiled as league achieves national footprint with coast-to-coast reach
Michael ‘Woody’ Woodring ’74 Scholarship established to support Mountaineer track & field and cross country student-athletes
Panthers Fall to #10 John Carroll
Lyla Auth wins 2025-26 volleyball Gatorade Player of the Year honors
A Dream Come True: Henrik Peters Set For Rookie Challenge Debut With Marko Stipp Motorsport – Speedway Digest
Long Beach Poly vs. Jordan, Boys’ Basketball – The562.org
Stempien to seek opening for Branch County Circuit Court Judge | WTVB | 1590 AM · 95.5 FM
Ross Brawn to receive Autosport Gold Medal Award at 2026 Autosport Awards, Honouring a Lifetime Shaping Modern F1
Princeton Area Community Foundation awards more than $1.3 million to 40 local nonprofits ⋆ Princeton, NJ local news %
Downtown Athletic Club of Hawaiʻi gives $300K to Boost the ’Bows NIL fund
Badgers news: Wisconsin lands 2nd commitment from transfer portal
Five Youth Sports Trends We’re Watching in 2026
Badgers news: Final Four Game Thread vs. No. 1 Kentucky Wildcats
Kentucky VB adds an All-American honorable mention, loses Brooke Bultema to portal
Beach Volleyball Unveils 2026 Spring Schedule – University of South Carolina Athletics
Three Clarkson Volleyball Players Named to CSC Academic All-District List
Kentucky AD explains NIL, JMI partnership and cap rules
Central’s Meyer earns weekly USTFCCCA national honor
Is women’s volleyball the SEC’s next big sport? How Kentucky, Texas A&M broke through
BangShift.com IHRA Acquires Historic Memphis Motorsports Park In Millington Tennessee. Big Race Weekend’s Planned For 2026!
PRI Show revs through Indy, sets tone for 2026 racing season
NBA Legend Michael Jordan to Join NBC Sports as Special Contributor
Why a rising mid-major power with an NCAA Tournament team opted out of revenue-sharing — and advertised it
Trackhouse to pair Chastain with McSwain
Volleyball Falls to SEMO – Tennessee State University
Kennewick School Board backs changes to gender inclusion in sports | News
-
Rec Sports2 weeks agoFive Youth Sports Trends We’re Watching in 2026
-
Sports3 weeks agoKentucky VB adds an All-American honorable mention, loses Brooke Bultema to portal
-
Motorsports3 weeks agoBangShift.com IHRA Acquires Historic Memphis Motorsports Park In Millington Tennessee. Big Race Weekend’s Planned For 2026!
-
Sports2 weeks agoH.S. INDOOR TRACK & FIELD: GLOW region athletes face off at Nazareth University | Sports
-
NIL3 weeks ago
Fifty years after IU’s undefeated champs … a Rose Bowl
-
Sports3 weeks ago2025 Volleyball Player of the Year: Witherow makes big impact on Central program | Nvdaily
-
Sports3 weeks agoColorado volleyball poised to repeat success
-
Sports3 weeks agoTexas A&M volleyball’s sweep of Kentucky attracts record viewership
-
Motorsports3 weeks agoKyle Larson opens door to 24 Hours of Daytona comeback – Motorsport – Sports
-
NIL3 weeks agoNIL Funds Are at Top of Arizona State’s Christmas Wishlist