Connect with us
https://yoursportsnation.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/call-to-1.png

NIL

Cost of business? Transfer portal study suggests non

Published

on

Cost of business? Transfer portal study suggests non

gettyimages-2188787290.jpg
Getty Images

The NCAA transfer portal has not yet been in place a decade but its effect on college football is almost too difficult to measure. The portal, in conjunction with the ever-changing landscape of NIL, has come to define — for better or worse — the current climate of college athletics.

In analyzing seven years worth of transfer data as it relates to former highly coveted high school recruits, a number of trends have developed. Not surprisingly, quarterbacks transfer more often than any other position group. In fact, seven of 247Sports’ top eight quarterbacks in the 2023 recruiting class have transferred.

And while a transferring player might earn more playing time or collect a bigger paycheck somewhere else, the data suggests changing schools may negatively affect their NFL Draft outlook.

Non-transfers more likely to be drafted

Among players considered to be elite coming out of high school (Top247) who have had at least four seasons in college from the 2018 class and beyond, 307 have been drafted. Of those 307 draft picks, 61 of them were transfers. 

Transfers from the 2018 through 2021 Top247 were drafted at a rate of 11.4%.

Non-transfers from the same Top247 classes were drafted 53.6% of the time.

Non-transfers also tend to be further ahead when it comes to being three-and-done college players. There were 25 former Top247 recruits drafted from the 2022 class this past April, only three of them (Travis HunterWalter NolenMatthew Golden) were transfers. 

Also of note: Only two of the 199 multi-time transfers from the 2018 to 2022 Top247 classes have been drafted so far. Tyler Shough played for OregonTexas Tech and Louisville with much of his off-field movement coming as a result of injuries that led to others taking his job. Tyler Baron, meanwhile, did technically transfer twice. But he did so in the same offseason going from Tennessee to Louisville to Miami in a matter of five months.

Players tend to transfer for a reason. There are exceptions like high-quality players bolting because of a coaching change or looking for a pay raise. But mostly, Top247 players tend to stay put unless they’re looking for additional playing time or got in some sort of trouble.

The real transfer success stories tend to be those players jumping up from the G5 or FCS levels. That’s the path you saw 2025 first-round picks Cam Ward (Incarnate Word to Washington State to Miami) and Josh Simmons (San Diego State to Ohio State) take.

Transfers by position

Top247 quarterbacks transfer more than any other position at a rate of 69.8% between the 2018 and 2023 class; the 2024 class was not included in this data set as it’s still too early to get a broad picture of that classes’ transfer rate.

Comparatively, offensive linemen and defensive tackles transfer at the lowest rate. 

Quarterbacks

69.8%

Wide receivers

64.2%

Running backs

59.5%

Cornerbacks

59.4%

Linebackers

52.8%

Safeties

51.1%

Edge rushers

49%

Tight ends

48.4%

Interior offensive linemen

37.3%

Defensive tackles

36.1%

Offensive tackles

32.5%

Only one quarterback can play for each team and more than 60% of Power Four starters last season were former transfer quarterbacks. They don’t tend to wait around. 

Talking to coaches and personnel staffers, the skill positions tend to be the easiest to find in the portal. There are always wide receivers, running backs and defensive backs in abundance.

Conversely, offensive and defensive linemen are the most difficult players to acquire in the portal. There are two reasons for this: 1. Linemen are developmental players. It can take years for a tackle to mature. Thus, they tend to transfer less frequently. 2. Given how much developmental investment goes into linemen on either side of the line of scrimmage, schools are usually willing to pay whatever it takes to keep their success stories. 

There’s a reason why there were 36 wide receivers ranked as a four-star from the 2025 transfer rankings compared to just 22 offensive tackles. There are just fewer quality offensive tackles available than any other position. 

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

NIL

Charles Barkley on NIL, transfer portal: ‘You should not have the ability to get a better offer every year’

Published

on


NBA legend Charles Barkley has not been shy about his thoughts on NIL and the transfer portal. During Saturday’s Kentucky vs. Indiana broadcast, he candidly discussed the landscape again.

Barkley called the game on ESPN alongside Dick Vitale, the first of two games they will work together. Vitale called for “stability” in college basketball – and college sports as a whole – because of the amount of player movement via the portal. He used Indiana as an example since new coach Darian DeVries virtually built the program from scratch.

Advertisement

SUBSCRIBE to the On3 NIL and Sports Business Newsletter

While Barkley acknowledged he’s in favor of athletes making money through NIL, he also called out players staying more than their four years of eligibility. In addition, he disagreed with the idea of athletes being allowed to seek better offers after every season.

“No. 1, I’m not opposed to players getting paid,” Barkley said on the broadcast. “I always want my players to get treated fairly. But I can’t remember the last time I heard the word, COVID. Some of these guys have been in college for six or seven years. If you’re in college for six or seven years, your name better be, ‘Dr. Somebody.’ You should not still be playing college basketball after six or seven years.

“But you should not have the ability to get a better offer every year. That’s not fair to any school that you are affiliated with because I can’t even do that. None of us can do that, take a better – Amazon, anybody or FOX Sports can come and say, ‘Well, we’ll give you more money and you can leave after every year.’ That’s not fair. … We’ve got to put some guardrails on these sports.”

Advertisement

One of the other new parts of the college basketball landscape is G-League players seeking eligibility. The NCAA has changed its approach regarding players who played in the G-League, arguing they were not professional athletes in a way the old rule said. Instead, if those players are within five years of their high school graduation, they could become eligible unless they went through the NBA Draft process or signed an NBA contract.

To Charles Barkley, that’s another area that needs fixing. He does not think former G-League players should be able to play college basketball.

“We’ve got guys playing in the G-League coming back to college sports now,” he said. “I don’t think that’s fair.”



Link

Continue Reading

NIL

Charles Barkley sends strong message after historic college football program’s CFP snub

Published

on


Hall of Famer and ESPN basketball analyst Charles Barkley has an opinion on most everything, and that includes the College Football Playoff committee’s decision to leave 10-2 Notre Dame off of the 12-team bracket.

Barkley and ESPN college basketball analyst Dick Vitale discussed the Fighting Irish’s CFP snub while calling the Indiana-Kentucky game on Saturday night.

“I was disappointed, but you could see it coming in the last couple polls,” Barkley said. “They were creeping up on Miami. And my biggest problem with the whole thing, everybody’s talked about head-to-head. First of all, that was in August.

“They were very close games [against] A&M and at Miami, but your team is not the same in August as it is in December. Notre Dame is playing as well as anybody in the country other than Indiana and probably Ohio State. And I don’t want to leave out the [Georgia] Bulldogs. Kirby Smart, that man can really coach.”

Notre Dame Fighting Irish running back Aneyas Williams

Notre Dame Fighting Irish running back Aneyas Williams (22) celebrates with Notre Dame Fighting Irish tight end Ty Washington (7) | Stan Szeto-Imagn Images

Notre Dame’s exclusion from the bracket after winning its final 10 games all by double-digit margins and being ranked ahead of Miami (10-2) in every CFP poll until the final one, even though neither the Irish nor Hurricanes played in that final week before the bracket was set, will go down as one of the biggest playoff controversies.

Ultimately, it came down to Miami’s 27-24 home win over Notre Dame in Week 1, a field goal with 1:04 remaining.

Miami supporters clamored and complained all along that the Hurricanes should have been ranked ahead of the Irish, given the same record, well before the final bracket was set. But the teams’ seasons went very different directions after that Week 1 meeting.

Notre Dame lost its first two games by a combined four points, including a 41-40 Week 2 loss to Texas A&M (another CFP team), before reeling off those 10 straight wins, most in dominant fashion.

Miami lost twice in a three-game span to unranked Louisville and SMU before regrouping and finishing strong.

The first CFP rankings came out after that second loss, with Miami landing at No. 18 and Notre Dame at No. 10. Because the teams weren’t close in their overall ranking, the head-to-head result didn’t factor in at the time, and that remained the CFP committee’s explanation even as the teams moved closer and closer in the rankings.

Ultimately, they were two spots apart at No. 10/12, separated by BYU, entering last weekend, when the Cougars got blown out by Texas Tech, essentially forcing the committee to consider Notre Dame and Miami side by side. Others have suggested that both teams deserved to be in over 10-3 Alabama, which lost 28-7 to Georgia in the SEC championship game.

Notre Dame has not taken the snub well and declined to participate in a bowl game as a result.

No. 10-seed Miami will play at No. 7 Texas A&M in the first round of the playoffs on Dec. 20.



Link

Continue Reading

NIL

President Donald Trump calls NIL a ‘disaster’ for college athletics, Olympics

Published

on


President Trump this weekend noted the “current state of NIL is simply not sustainable and could cause serious damage to college athletics, and even the Olympics.” Trump during an event hosting members of the 1980 Miracle on Ice team said, “I think that it’s a disaster for college sports. I think it’s a disaster for the Olympics.” Trump: “The colleges are cutting a lot of their — they would call them sort of the ‘lesser’ sports, and they’re losing them like at numbers nobody can believe. They were really training grounds, beautiful training grounds, hard-working, wonderful young people.” Trump added, “A lot of these sports that were training so well would win gold medals because of it. Those sports don’t exist, because they’re putting all their money into football.” Trump: “Colleges cannot afford to be paying the kind of salaries that you’re hearing about” (OUTKICK, 12/13). Trump said of overhauling NIL in college sports, “Something ought to be done, and I’m willing to put the federal government behind it. And if it’s not done fast, you’re going to wipe out colleges” (USA TODAY, 12/12).



Link

Continue Reading

NIL

ESPN FPI has 2 teams tied as College Football Playoff favorites

Published

on


If you can’t pick one favorite, maybe it’s wise to pick two. That certainly seems to be the logical play with ESPN, as their FPI rankings give two teams an even chance to win the national title– even beyond the tenth of a percent. FPI is a slightly controversial prediction index that ties past performance into a mathematical attempt to predict future results.

Throughout the 2025 season, ESPN not only ranked the teams, but forecast their chance to win their respectives leagues, to earn a CFP berth, and even to win the CFP title. But heading into the opening week of CFP play, two teams are in exactly the same shape on top of ESPN’s ranking of most likely teams to win the national title.

FPI’s title favorites

Both Ohio State and Indiana are given a 25.9% chance to win the CFP title. Interestingly, Ohio State is slightly more likely to reach the title game, in ESPN’s reckoning (a 45% chance for the Buckeyes against a 43.1% chance for Indiana). The two are massive co-favorites, as ESPN’s third team in terms of title likelihood is Georgia, with an 11.6% shot at winning the title.

The Remainder of the CFP field

The only other teams with a better than 10% chance at the championship are Texas Tech and Oregon. The Red Raiders are rated at a 10.9% chance to win the title. The Ducks are rated with a 10.3% chance to grab the title.

No team outside of those five has a greater than 4.8% chance at winning the title– with that particular figure being linked to Ole Miss’s title chances. ESPN’s computers certainly don’t think well of the two Group of Five teams, as ESPN gives both Tulane and James Madison a 0.1% chance at winning the CFP crown. James Madison is rated with an 0.5% chance of reaching the title game, while Tulane’s chance is 0.4%.

Confusion reigns about FPI’s ratings

The math-related details behind the CFP can be complicated. 6-6 Penn State is still FPI’s No. 17 team in the nation, while 5-7 Auburn is No. 26. FPI also greatly appreciated Notre Dame, ranking the Irish third nationally. That’s comfortably ahead of the Miami and Alabama teams that grabbed the last CFP spots instead of the Irish (Miami ranks seventh and Notre Dame eighth at all. But when it comes to title chances, the FPI is all in on two teams in an exactly equal measure.

Indiana/OSU

Indiana and Ohio State are favored in exactly equal measures by ESPN’s FPI ratings. | Rich Janzaruk/Herald-Times / USA TODAY NETWORK via Imagn Images



Link

Continue Reading

NIL

Charles Barkley on NIL, transfer portal: ‘You should not have the ability to get a better offer every year’

Published

on


NBA legend Charles Barkley has not been shy about his thoughts on NIL and the transfer portal. During Saturday’s Kentucky vs. Indiana broadcast, he candidly discussed the landscape again.

Barkley called the game on ESPN alongside Dick Vitale, the first of two games they will work together. Vitale called for “stability” in college basketball – and college sports as a whole – because of the amount of player movement via the portal. He used Indiana as an example since new coach Darian DeVries virtually built the program from scratch.

SUBSCRIBE to the On3 NIL and Sports Business Newsletter

While Barkley acknowledged he’s in favor of athletes making money through NIL, he also called out players staying more than their four years of eligibility. In addition, he disagreed with the idea of athletes being allowed to seek better offers after every season.

“No. 1, I’m not opposed to players getting paid,” Barkley said on the broadcast. “I always want my players to get treated fairly. But I can’t remember the last time I heard the word, COVID. Some of these guys have been in college for six or seven years. If you’re in college for six or seven years, your name better be, ‘Dr. Somebody.’ You should not still be playing college basketball after six or seven years.

“But you should not have the ability to get a better offer every year. That’s not fair to any school that you are affiliated with because I can’t even do that. None of us can do that, take a better – Amazon, anybody or FOX Sports can come and say, ‘Well, we’ll give you more money and you can leave after every year.’ That’s not fair. … We’ve got to put some guardrails on these sports.”

One of the other new parts of the college basketball landscape is G-League players seeking eligibility. The NCAA has changed its approach regarding players who played in the G-League, arguing they were not professional athletes in a way the old rule said. Instead, if those players are within five years of their high school graduation, they could become eligible unless they went through the NBA Draft process or signed an NBA contract.

To Charles Barkley, that’s another area that needs fixing. He does not think former G-League players should be able to play college basketball.

“We’ve got guys playing in the G-League coming back to college sports now,” he said. “I don’t think that’s fair.”



Link

Continue Reading

NIL

$29 million college football coach surges as favorite to replace Sherrone Moore at Michigan

Published

on


Michigan began the week coming off a 9–3 regular season, with a Citrus Bowl matchup against No. 13 Texas on December 31 looming.

Instead, an internal investigation and a subsequent arrest that led to criminal charges left the Wolverines without head coach Sherrone Moore, forcing the athletic department into a high-stakes national search for his successor.

Moore, hired Jan. 26, 2024, and elevated from Michigan’s staff, completed two seasons as Michigan’s head coach with a record of 18-8.

Several names have circulated in the wake of Moore’s dismissal, but few have drawn more immediate attention than Arizona State head coach Kenny Dillingham, who, according to Kalshi, emerged as the market favorite with a 58% implied probability to land the Michigan job. 

This puts him well ahead of Alabama’s Kalen DeBoer (19%), Washington’s Jedd Fisch (13%), and Los Angeles Chargers defensive coordinator Jesse Minter (3%).

Dillingham’s Sun Devils rose from a 3-9 debut season to an 11-3, Big 12-championship campaign in 2024, then followed it with another solid 8-4 finish in 2025 despite losing former four-star quarterback Sam Leavitt midway through the year.

At just 34, the Arizona State alumnus has already rebuilt his alma mater into a conference champion and College Football Playoff participant, helping explain why his name has emerged as a focal point in both media coverage and prediction markets.

After that breakout 2024 season, Arizona State extended Dillingham through 2029, raising his 2025 base salary to $5.8 million as part of a $29 million agreement.

Arizona State Sun Devils head coach Kenny Dillingham.

Tempe, Arizona, USA; Arizona State Sun Devils head coach Kenny Dillingham reacts against the Arizona Wildcats in the second half during the 99th Territorial Cup at Mountain America Stadium. | Mark J. Rebilas-Imagn Images

NCAA transfer portal rule changes moved the primary window to Jan. 2-16 and limited the special window after coaching changes to 15 days, beginning five days after a new hire is announced, giving Michigan a clear incentive to move quickly to retain players and recruits.

That timetable, combined with the expectation to uphold the championship standard Moore inherited, has accelerated Michigan’s process, with a decision expected within the coming weeks.

Read More at College Football HQ

  • $1.3 million college football coach reportedly accepts head coaching job

  • First-team All-Conference WR enters college football transfer portal

  • College football program loses 11 players to transfer portal

  • $2.5 college football coach reportedly accepts new head coaching job after winning season





Link

Continue Reading

Most Viewed Posts

Trending