Connect with us

NIL

Kentucky Baseball’s Odds to Win the College World Series

Kentucky was only a couple of wins away from winning the College World Series in 2024. What are the chances they actually do it in 2025? I’m so glad you asked. The Bat Cats do not have the same momentum entering the postseason as they did a year ago. Kentucky followed up a Regional Championship […]

Published

on


Kentucky was only a couple of wins away from winning the College World Series in 2024. What are the chances they actually do it in 2025? I’m so glad you asked.

The Bat Cats do not have the same momentum entering the postseason as they did a year ago. Kentucky followed up a Regional Championship campaign by only dropping one mid-week game and going 22-8 in SEC play. It gave Kentucky a national seed in the NCAA Tournament, which meant home-field advantage in the Super Regional.

Kentucky parlayed regular-season wins into postseason success. That home-field advantage paid dividends in the Super Regional sweep of Oregon State. Unfortunately, they won’t have that home-field advantage at Kentucky Proud Park on the road to the College World Series in 2025.

Despite a few late bid-stealers, the Bat Cats were on the right side of the NCAA Tournament bubble. The Wildcats secured a No. 3 seed in the Clemson Regional. They will open NCAA Tournament play on Friday against West Virginia.

According to our friends at FanDuel, Kentucky is +320 to win the Clemson Regional. If you prefer making a wager at a bigger price, I’ve got good news for you. Kentucky is +10,000 to keep that train rolling and win the College World Series.

Kentucky has been on the wrong side of close games all year. Maybe now the ball starts finally bouncing their way? Their march to the College World Series begins Friday at Noon on ESPNU.

College World Series Odds

Rank Team FanDuel Odds
1 Tennessee Volunteers +750
2 Texas A&M Aggies +900
3 LSU Tigers +950
4 Arkansas Razorbacks +1100
5 Virginia Cavaliers +1200
6 Florida Gators +1600
7 Wake Forest Demon Deacons +1800
8 North Carolina Tar Heels +1800
9 TCU Horned Frogs +2100
10 Oregon State Beavers +2200
11 Florida State Seminoles +2000
12 Texas Longhorns +2600
13 Kentucky Wildcats +2900
14 Vanderbilt Commodores +2900
15 Clemson Tigers +3100
16 Georgia Bulldogs +3100
17 East Carolina Pirates +3700
18 NC State Wolfpack +4000
19 Oklahoma Sooners +4000
20 Mississippi State Bulldogs +4200

Want more coverage of the Cats? Join KSR+

KSR has been delivering UK Sports news in the most ridiculous manner for almost two decades. Now, you can get even more coverage of the Cats with KSR+. In the middle of an exciting Kentucky offseason, now is the perfect time to join our online community. Subscribe now for premium articles, in-depth scouting reports, inside intel, bonus recruiting coverage, and access to KSBoard, our message board featuring thousands of Kentucky fans around the globe. Come join the club.



Link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

NIL

The importance of regaining the aura of Alabama Football

The aura has been lost, and in year two of the DeBoer era, it is more important than ever for some of that to return to the Alabama football program. With the NIL and transfer portal era, there is a lot more parity in college football, and because of that, we’ve seen Alabama be less […]

Published

on


The aura has been lost, and in year two of the DeBoer era, it is more important than ever for some of that to return to the Alabama football program. With the NIL and transfer portal era, there is a lot more parity in college football, and because of that, we’ve seen Alabama be less dominant and opponents having more confidence than ever before that they can beat Alabama. We saw that in 2023 with how Quinn Ewers came into Bryant-Denny Stadium and dominated, and it was seen far too much last season.

This summer so far, we’ve seen Diego Pavia’s social media response to Ryan Williams, and the newest hot topic this week is what Thomas Castellanos had to say about the week one matchup. I get it, players should have confidence in their abilities and teams being able to beat Alabama, but it’s a different world when Vanderbilt legitimately feels like they are on the same level, or a team coming off a 2-10 season has any bulletin board material to give going into the season. The jury is still out on the Crimson Tide going into this season, and because of that, now more than ever, teams feel like it’s time to get their licks back.

Everything seems to still revolve around what Nick Saban did and what he still does to help the program. Though his presence is important and his run will always be held in high regard, it is important that in Kalen DeBoer’s second season that we start to see less of that focus on the past. The big question is, how do you do that? And the simple answer is to win games, and that starts with winning convincingly in Tallahassee, winning all three revenge games at home in 2025, and ending the season much stronger than 2024 with at least one playoff game. The path of transition is far from easy, but if Duke was able to transition from Coach K to John Scheyer without much, if any, drop off, there is no doubt the same can be done in Tuscaloosa.



Link

Continue Reading

NIL

St. John’s Coach Rick Pitino On NIL, Transfer Portal: ‘Complaining is of No Value’

Rick Pitino took St. John’s from being a team that was nowhere to be found in the NCAA Tournament conversation to a No. 2 seed in just two seasons. How did Pitino get the Red Storm to rise to prominence so quickly? Living in the reality of NIL and the transfer portal, rather than fighting […]

Published

on


Rick Pitino took St. John’s from being a team that was nowhere to be found in the NCAA Tournament conversation to a No. 2 seed in just two seasons.

How did Pitino get the Red Storm to rise to prominence so quickly? Living in the reality of NIL and the transfer portal, rather than fighting it.

“I felt the change was here and quitting, resigning, complaining is of no value,” Pitino said about NIL on Wednesday’s edition of “The Herd.” “You have to win the day. You have to get the job done, and I just felt that ‘Okay, we’re going to use it to the best of our abilities at St. John’s.’ 

“So, we’re an urban school; we’re a computer school; we play in Madison Square Garden as our home court: How can we maximize our potential by embracing the NIL and the transfer portal? We went away from high school basketball players, although we have taken one or two to develop, but by and large we’ve gone after older players.”

Pitino also expressed that parents have never been more involved in the recruiting process than now.

On the basketball front, Pitino explained what his practices look like.

“We have player development sessions every morning, Monday through Friday, where we go three-to-four different sessions with four players, and we try to take players like a Donovan Mitchell, a Terry Rozier who maybe’s not ranked top-20 or 25 in high school, and they’ve got a little bit of a weakness. Donovan Mitchell had a weakness with the arc on his jump shot. Everybody’s got a weakness coming out that’s not top 10, so we try to take those player development sessions and make the players better,” Pitino said.

“Our practices, yes, are very difficult, but I will say this: They’re not long. We don’t go more than two hours, but we go hard for two hours. We’re up and down for two hours. If I make a comment or a correction, it’s going to be within 12 seconds, and then we’re moving on because conditioning is a gigantic part of our style of play.”

After going 20-13 in the 2023-24 season, Pitino and the Red Storm put together a 31-5 campaign highlighted by winning the Big East regular-season title with an 18-2 conference record, winning the Big East Tournament and claiming a No. 2 seed in the NCAA Tournament. While St. John’s was upset in the second round by No. 10 seed Arkansas, the 2024-25 season marked the first time in six years that the program had made the NCAA Tournament and the first time in 10 years that it had done so without having to play in the First Four round.

On the personal front, Pitino won the 2024-25 Naismith, AP and Big East Coach of the Year awards. St. John’s is Pitino’s sixth full-time men’s college basketball head-coaching gig, with the Hall of Famer previously coaching three seasons at Iona before leaving for Queens in March 2023. 

St. John’s had a gargantuan transfer portal class this offseason, reeling in former five-star recruits and now sophomores Ian Jackson (previously of North Carolina) and Joson Sanon (previously of Arizona State), former Providence forward Bryce Hopkins, former Cincinnati forward Dillon Mitchell and former Stanford wing Oziyah Sellers, among others. 247Sports ranks St. John’s transfer class as the best in men’s college basketball.

While the Red Storm have minimal returning players, they have big man and 2024-25 All-Big East honoree Zuby Ejiofor back for his senior season. Next season, St. John’s will square off against SEC powerhouses Alabama and Kentucky, among other notable out-of-conference matchups.

Rick Pitino on the 2025 NBA Draft, Caitlin Clark’s Impact, Cooper Flagg

Rick Pitino on the 2025 NBA Draft, Caitlin Clark’s Impact, Cooper Flagg

Want great stories delivered right to your inbox? Create or log in to your FOX Sports account, and follow leagues, teams and players to receive a personalized newsletter daily!

FOLLOW Follow your favorites to personalize your FOX Sports experience

College Basketball

Big East

St. John’s Red Storm


Get more from College Basketball Follow your favorites to get information about games, news and more




Link

Continue Reading

NIL

NCAA allowing college basketball schedule to expand starting 2026-27 season

Gonzaga’s midseason showdown with Kentucky during the heat of the 2023-24 campaign was a rare instance of two college basketball heavyweights setting aside their conference obligations to deliver a thrilling nonleague matchup in the weeks leading up to the postseason. Up until that point, marquee nonconference games were mostly reserved for November and December, when […]

Published

on


Gonzaga’s midseason showdown with Kentucky during the heat of the 2023-24 campaign was a rare instance of two college basketball heavyweights setting aside their conference obligations to deliver a thrilling nonleague matchup in the weeks leading up to the postseason.

Up until that point, marquee nonconference games were mostly reserved for November and December, when the college basketball calendar is at its most flexible. But in light of a recent proposal that, if approved, would extend the sport’s regular season by one game, more high-profile contests like the one between the Bulldogs and Wildcats in February 2024 could become more commonplace in the future.

According to a report from CBS Sports’ Matt Norlander, the NCAA Division I Council will approve an increase from 31 to 32 games beginning with the 2026-27 season. Teams will be allowed to schedule up to one more game, barring any last-minute vetoes, but won’t be forced to play out a full 32-game schedule if they choose not to. Contests against non-Division I opponents will also count toward the total.

An expanded schedule would mean that teams that advance to the National Championship game could play up to 41 games during that season. No team has ever crossed the 40-game threshold to this point.

Per Norlander, the driving factor behind the push for 32 games is tied to multi-team events and their increasingly restrictive guidelines stemming from conference expansion, which has led to schools in the same league competing against each other in some events. That was previously not allowed but has since been changed through a waiver process. It’s also worth noting that lengthening the schedule will allow MTEs like the NIL-driven Players Era Festival to schedule three- or four-game tournaments.

Players Era is set for a second run this November with 20 participants, including Gonzaga, and is hoping to grow to 32 teams by 2026.

Of course, money is also at the forefront. In addition to freeing up more opportunities for lucrative neutral site contests, moving to 32 games will allow programs to host one more home game. With the House settlement ushering in revenue sharing for college athletes, teams will certainly be looking for more ways to create revenue.

The maximum games a team can play in a season was set at 31 in 2006-07. The format was 28 or 29 predetermined games with room for three-game or two-game multi-team events if applicable, making it a 31-game cap.

The switch to 32 games would align with Gonzaga’s move to the Pac-12 conference, which is to be made official on July 1, 2026. Only time will tell how the league arranges its conference schedule for men’s basketball, as the Pac-12’s current priorities are to find another football-playing school to join as a full-time member.

MORE GONZAGA NEWS & ANALYSIS



Link

Continue Reading

NIL

Highest-Paid College Football Players if NIL Existed Since 2000

The analysis explores how college football players would have financially benefited from Name, Image, and Likeness (NIL) deals had they been available since 2000. Writers ranked players like Johnny Manziel, Reggie Bush, and Tim Tebow based on their hypothetical NIL earnings, reflecting on the lucrative potential of their marketability. Manziel leads with an estimated $35 […]

Published

on


The analysis explores how college football players would have financially benefited from Name, Image, and Likeness (NIL) deals had they been available since 2000. Writers ranked players like Johnny Manziel, Reggie Bush, and Tim Tebow based on their hypothetical NIL earnings, reflecting on the lucrative potential of their marketability. Manziel leads with an estimated $35 million, followed by notable players such as Bush and Tebow, showcasing how the rise of NIL could have dramatically changed athletes’ financial landscapes. This retrospective illustrates the growing tensions between athlete compensation and traditional NCAA policies.

By the Numbers

  • Johnny Manziel: $35 million
  • Reggie Bush: $25 million
  • Tim Tebow: $22 million
  • Cam Newton: $20 million
  • Vince Young: $15 million

Yes, But

There are contrasting views on whether NIL benefits would have truly leveled the playing field or just enhanced disparities among programs with existing resources. Some argue that while top-tier schools benefit more from these arrangements, lower-tier programs might struggle to compete for top talent.

State of Play

  • NIL policies are now a game-changer in college athletics, allowing players to monetize their brand.
  • The debate surrounding compensation in college sports continues to evolve as more athletes seek financial opportunities.

What’s Next

Future developments may involve more stringent regulations around NIL deals to address concerns regarding equity among athletes. Additionally, the impact of NIL on recruiting strategies and team dynamics is likely to reshape how colleges approach athletic programs.

Bottom Line

The exploration into past athletes’ potential NIL earnings underscores significant shifts in college athletics, highlighting how financial opportunities could redefine the landscape, empower athletes, and create lasting impacts on the NCAA’s structure.





Link

Continue Reading

NIL

Happy Hour: Opting in decision with AD Jon Schemmel – Sioux Falls Live

So, the South Dakota Coyotes will now get to pay athletes directly starting July 1, thanks to USD athletic director Jon Schemmel’s June 17 decision to “opt in” to the NCAA-House Settlement, allowing revenue sharing to athletes for the first time. How does it all work? How much money will there be to share with […]

Published

on


So, the South Dakota Coyotes will now get to pay athletes directly starting July 1, thanks to USD athletic director Jon Schemmel’s June 17 decision to “opt in” to the NCAA-House Settlement, allowing revenue sharing to athletes for the first time.

How does it all work? How much money will there be to share with athletes this year? Which athletes get the money? How much do they get? What does this mean for the major boosters and those who want to contribute more mildly, either to the athletic department or the athletes directly?

Schemmel has the answers in a 73-minute conversation with Happy Hour host John Gaskins. He also addresses the well-publicized shot he took at Sacramento State’s president on social media last week, which leads to a conversation about USD’s desire to stay in the FCS versus the appeal, if any, of trying to move to the FBS like Sac State is attempting (and failing.)

Another major USD issue — attendance. Why does it lag so far behind rival SDSU in football and basketball, and what will it take from Schemmel and others at USD to narrow the gap?

Here is more detail about what you’ll find:

PART 1 – HOW WILL REVENUE SHARING WITH ATHLETES WORK?

Now that the school will be able to share revenue, how will NIL now work for USD athletes who want to make that? What does this mean for USD’s third-party NIL “collective” that was the source to (mostly) keep top athletes or lure in transfers?

How much will it help USD competitively — in recruiting and on the field? Will this stop or limit the transfer portal absurdity the Coyote football team fell victim to in the spring?

And, really, why wouldn’t a school like USD not “opt-in” to sharing revenue with athletes now that they know they won’t to have to make any roster cuts to current athletes? Why was this such a quicker (easier) decision for USD to make than it may be for SDSU and NDSU?

PART 2 – FCS vs FBS, FOOTBALL & BASKETBALL ATTENDANCE, JOHANSEN’S FIRST SIX MONTHS

It was the X (Twitter) shot heard ’round the FCS world last week.

Schemmel fired back at Sacramento State president Kevin Wood, who had publicly called FCS football — where the Hornets reside — “JV” football. When the FBS oversight committee recommended the NCAA to deny SCSU’s entry into the FBS (“varsity”) Schemmel posted something that became hot fodder for FCS enthusiasts:

“All of us JV programs are excited to compete against a varsity program!”

(Since then, the NCAA Div. I council officially denied SCSU’s attempt to enter the FBS on the basis it needed a conference affiliation, which it hasn’t found.)

Schemmel, who has led USD athletics for about 18 months, had no idea the kind of wildfire one public social media sentence would trigger. But he never took down the post and stood his ground in talking about the post in this interview.

This led to a discussion about USD’s desires, or lack thereof, to move from FCS — where the Yotes finished a national semifinalist in 2024 — up to FBS to have a (likely very long) shot of playing in the College Football Playoff and receiving the mother load of money that’d come with it.

Schemmel does not shy away from acknowledging where USD stands in FCS achievement, attendance, interest, and financial strength compared to the Coyotes’ two biggest rivals, and perennial powerhouses, SDSU and NDSU.

Why is there such a gap, and how does USD narrow it, particularly in drawing more fans (and revenue) to the major sports of football and basketball (men’s and women’s)?

Finally, Schemmel gives his assessment of first-year head football coach Travis Johansen’s navigation through spring practice and a transfer portal that plucked away several top players for far more NIL money at FBS schools— also an update on the retired Bob Nielson, who Johansen replaced.

FULL INTERVIEW with USD A.D. Jon Schemmel (Paying athletes, NIL future, FCS vs FBS, game attendance, Travis Johansen so far)

Wed Jun 25 17:03:00 EDT 2025

So, the South Dakota Coyotes will now get to pay athletes directly starting July 1, thanks to USD athletic director Jon Schemmel’s June 17 decision to “opt in” to the NCAA-House Settlement allowing revenue sharing to athletes for the first time.

How does it all work? How much money will there be to share with athletes this year? Which athletes get the money? How much do they get? What does this mean for the major boosters and those who want to contribute more mildly, either to the athletic department or the athletes directly? 

Schemmel has the answers in a 73-minute conversation with Happy Hour host John Gaskins. He also addresses the well-publicized shot he took at Sacramento State’s president on social media last week, which leads to a conversation about USD’s desire to stay in the FCS versus the appeal, if any, of trying to move to the FBS like Sac State is attempting (and failing.)

Another major USD issue — attendance. Why does it lag so far behind rival SDSU in football and basketball, and what will it take from Schemmel and others at USD to narrow the gap? 

Here is more detail about you’ll find:

 

PART 1 – HOW WILL REVENUE SHARING WITH ATHLETES WORK? 

Now that the school will be able to share revenue, how will NIL now work for USD athletes who want to make that? What does this mean for USD’s third-party NIL “collective” that was the source to (mostly) keep top athletes or lure in transfers?

How much will it help USD competitively — in recruiting and on the field? Will this stop or limit the transfer portal absurdity the Coyote football team fell victim to in the spring?

And, really, why wouldn’t a school like USD not “opt-in” to sharing revenue with athletes now that they know they won’t to have to make any roster cuts to current athletes? Why was this such a quicker (easier) decision for USD to make than it may be for SDSU and NDSU?

 

PART 2 – FCS vs FBS, FOOTBALL & BASKETBALL ATTENDANCE, JOHANSEN’S FIRST SIX MONTHS

It was the X (Twitter) shot heard ’round the FCS world last week.

Schemmel fired back at Sacramento State president Kevin Wood, who had publicly called FCS football — where the Hornets reside — “JV” football. When the FBS oversight committee recommended the NCAA to deny SCSU’s entry into the FBS (“varsity”) Schemmel posted something that became hot fodder for FCS enthusiasts:

“All of us JV programs are excited to compete against a varsity program!” 

(Since then, the NCAA Div. I council officially denied SCSU’s attempt to enter the FBS on the basis it needed a conference affiliation, which it hasn’t found.)

Schemmel, who has led USD athletics for about 18 months, had no idea the kind of wildfire one public social media sentence would trigger. But he never took down the post and stood his ground in talking about the post in this interview.

This led to a discussion about USD’s desires, or lack thereof, to move from FCS — where the Yotes finished a national semifinalist in 2024 — up to FBS to have a (likely very long) shot of playing in the College Football Playoff and receiving the mother load of money that’d come with it.

Schemmel does not shy away from acknowledging where USD stands in FCS achievement, attendance, interest, and financial strength compared to the Coyotes’ two biggest rivals, and perennial powerhouses, SDSU and NDSU.

Why is there such a gap, and how does USD narrow it, particularly in drawing more fans (and revenue) to the major sports of football and basketball (men’s and women’s)?

Finally, Schemmel gives his assessment of first-year head football coach Travis Johansen’s navigation through spring practice and a transfer portal that plucked away several top players for far more NIL money at FBS schools. Also, an update on the retired Bob Nielson, who Johansen replaced.






Link

Continue Reading

NIL

Athletes First makes bold move to enhance college football presence

Athletes First already has some of the more renowned players in the NFL, not to mention a top-shelf coaching clientele that includes the likes of Ryan Day and Brian Kelly at the collegiate level as well as Matt LeFleur on the NFL side.  Now, the organization is making multiple moves to wade deeper into college […]

Published

on


Athletes First already has some of the more renowned players in the NFL, not to mention a top-shelf coaching clientele that includes the likes of Ryan Day and Brian Kelly at the collegiate level as well as Matt LeFleur on the NFL side. 

Now, the organization is making multiple moves to wade deeper into college football.

Multiple sources tell FootballScoop that Athletes First has hired longtime top Notre Dame personnel executive Dave Peloquin as well as LSU’s Jordan Arcement to bolster their college sports division — specifically the company’s process of identifying potential prep and college players who project to potential top-tier college Name, Image and Likeness clients as well as NFL prospects.

The company has several notable NFL clients, including former Notre Dame All-America safety Kyle Hamilton as well as Dallas Cowboys quarterback Dak Prescott. 

In a role that sources told FootballScoop essentially as as the company’s general manager of the collegiate division, Peloquin instantly brings wtih him almost a quarter-century work from his time at Notre Dame — spanning from his student-work as an undergraduate assistant. 

Starting in Bob Davie’s Notre Dame Fighting Irish program, Peloquin is one of the rarest individuals in all of college football — his value extending through five full-time Notre Dame football coaches beginning with Davie, transitioning to Ty Willingham, Charlies Weis, Brian Kelly and, finally, in multiple roles for Marcus Freeman.

He was both retained by all those Irish coaches and turned down numerous job opportunities to head up personnel departments for several other Power Conference programs, including in the Big Ten and SEC.

Arcement steadily grew in LSU’s recruiting department since his arrival in Baton Rouge, Louisiana, in 2022, following work at the University of Virginia. Most recently, Arcement was LSU’s director of recruiting communications and external relations. He also has coached in the prep ranks and played collegiate football at Nicholls State (La.).

The moves from Athletes First signal the company’s willingness to try to be on the leading edge of ongoing changes in college athletics, specifically college football.

The House Settlement takes effect July 1, with Power Conference schools who opt in at the maximum amount able to share $20.5 million in revenue with student-athletes — almost overwhelmingly directing the majority of those funds to football players — annually and with built-in increases of 4% annually over the decade-long terms of the deal.

Additionally, NIL opportunities are still available for college athletes and increasingly more so for high school athletes. At the college level, as part of the House Settlement, all NIL deals valued at more than $600 must be ratified by third-party financial powerhouse Deloitte. Athletes First, like other powerful agencies in college and pro athletics, has long history in dealing with marketing arrangements — the types of which Deloitte is being asked to oversee in the House Settlement. 



Link

Continue Reading

Most Viewed Posts

Trending