Connect with us
https://yoursportsnation.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/call-to-1.png

Technology

A guide to consumer-grade wearables in cardiovascular clinical care and population health for non-experts

Published

3 months ago

on


  • Dhingra, L. S. et al. Use of wearable devices in individuals with or at risk for cardiovascular disease in the US, 2019 to 2020. JAMA Netw. Open 6, e2316634–e2316634 (2023).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, S. et al. Wearables in cardiovascular disease. J. Cardiovascular Transl. Res. 16, 557–568 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  • Charlton, P. H. & Marozas, V. Wearable photoplethysmography devices, in Photoplethysmography. 2022, Elsevier. p. 401–439.

  • Charlton, P. H. et al. Wearable photoplethysmography for cardiovascular monitoring. Proc. IEEE 110, 355–381 (2022).

    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Charlton, P. H. et al. Breathing rate estimation from the electrocardiogram and photoplethysmogram: A review. IEEE Rev. Biomed. Eng. 11, 2–20 (2017).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Nitzan, M., Nitzan, I. & Arieli, Y. The various oximetric techniques used for the evaluation of blood oxygenation. Sensors 20, 4844 (2020).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Elgendi, M. et al. The use of photoplethysmography for assessing hypertension. NPJ digital Med. 2, 60 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  • Stergiou, G. S. et al. Cuffless blood pressure measuring devices: review and statement by the European Society of Hypertension Working Group on Blood Pressure Monitoring and Cardiovascular Variability. J. hypertension 40, 1449–1460 (2022).

    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Doherty, A. et al. Large scale population assessment of physical activity using wrist worn accelerometers: the UK biobank study. PloS one 12, e0169649 (2017).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouzid, Z., Al-Zaiti, S. S., Bond, R. & Sejdić, E. Remote and wearable ECG devices with diagnostic abilities in adults: A state-of-the-science scoping review. Heart Rhythm 19, 1192–1201 (2022).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Amir, H. M. et al. Comparison of Simultaneous Recordings from Medical-Grade and Smartwatch ECGs. Computing Cardiology (CinC) (IEEE, 2024).

  • Klimek, A., I. Mannheim, G. Schouten, E., Wouters, J. & Peeters, M.W. Wearables measuring electrodermal activity to assess perceived stress in care: a scoping review. Acta Neuropsychiatrica. 24, 1–11 (2023).

  • Posada-Quintero, H. F. & Chon, K. H. Innovations in electrodermal activity data collection and signal processing: A systematic review. Sensors 20, 479 (2020).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehra, A., Starkoff, B. E. & Nickerson, B. S. The evolution of bioimpedance analysis: From traditional methods to wearable technology. Nutrition. 129, 112601 (2024).

  • Samsung. How to measure your body composition or BMI with Galaxy Watch. 2025 [cited 2025 27/05/2025]; Available from: https://www.samsung.com/uk/support/mobile-devices/measure-your-body-composition-with-the-galaxy-watch-series/

  • Stehlik, J. et al. Continuous wearable monitoring analytics predict heart failure hospitalization: the LINK-HF multicenter study. Circulation: Heart Fail. 13, e006513 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  • Giménez-Miranda, L. et al. Wearable Devices Based on Bioimpedance Test in Heart Failure: Clinical Relevance: Systematic Review. Rev. Cardiovascular Med. 25, 315 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  • Boehmer, J. P. et al. A multisensor algorithm predicts heart failure events in patients with implanted devices: results from the MultiSENSE study. JACC: Heart Fail. 5, 216–225 (2017).

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Sieciński, S., Kostka, P. S. & Tkacz, E. J. Gyrocardiography: a review of the definition, history, waveform description, and applications. Sensors 20, 6675 (2020).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaakkola, J. et al. Mobile phone detection of atrial fibrillation with mechanocardiography: the MODE-AF Study (Mobile Phone Detection of Atrial Fibrillation). Circulation 137, 1524–1527 (2018).

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Doherty, C., M. Baldwin, A. Keogh, B. Caulfield, and R. Argent, Keeping Pace with Wearables: A Living Umbrella Review of Systematic Reviews Evaluating the Accuracy of Consumer Wearable Technologies in Health Measurement. Sports Medicine, 2024: p. 1–20.

  • Orini, M. et al. Long-term association of ultra-short heart rate variability with cardiovascular events. Sci. Rep. 13, 18966 (2023).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Vazir, A. et al. Association of resting heart rate and temporal changes in heart rate with outcomes in participants of the atherosclerosis risk in communities study. JAMA Cardiol. 3, 200–206 (2018).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Y. et al. Validity of Wrist-Worn photoplethysmography devices to measure heart rate: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Sports Sci. 38, 2021–2034 (2020).

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Parak, J. & Korhonen, I. Evaluation of wearable consumer heart rate monitors based on photopletysmography. in 2014 36th annual international conference of the IEEE engineering in medicine and biology society. IEEE (2014).

  • Nelson, B. W. & Allen, N. B. Accuracy of consumer wearable heart rate measurement during an ecologically valid 24-hour period: intraindividual validation study. JMIR mHealth uHealth 7, e10828 (2019).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallen, M. P., Gomersall, S. R., Keating, S. E., Wisløff, U. & Coombes, J. S. Accuracy of heart rate watches: implications for weight management. PloS one 11, e0154420 (2016).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillinov, S. et al. Variable accuracy of wearable heart rate monitors during aerobic exercise. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 49, 1697–1703 (2017).

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Shcherbina, A. et al. Accuracy in wrist-worn, sensor-based measurements of heart rate and energy expenditure in a diverse cohort. J. personalized Med. 7, 3 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  • Thiebaud, R. S. et al. Validity of wrist-worn consumer products to measure heart rate and energy expenditure. Digital health 4, 2055207618770322 (2018).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Dooley, E. E., Golaszewski, N. M. & Bartholomew, J. B. Estimating accuracy at exercise intensities: a comparative study of self-monitoring heart rate and physical activity wearable devices. JMIR mHealth uHealth 5, e7043 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, K., A. Jamieson, N. Chaturvedi, A. Hughes, and M. Orini. Validation of Wearable Derived Heart Rate Variability and Oxygen Saturation from the Garmin’s Health Snapshot. in 2023 Computing in Cardiology (CinC). 2023. IEEE.

  • Fuller, D. et al. Reliability and Validity of Commercially Available Wearable Devices for Measuring Steps, Energy Expenditure, and Heart Rate: Systematic Review. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 8, e18694 (2020).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Sartor, F., Papini, G., Cox, L. G. E. & Cleland, J. Methodological shortcomings of wrist-worn heart rate monitors validations. J. Med. Internet Res. 20, e10108 (2018).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Lang, M. Beyond Fitbit: a critical appraisal of optical heart rate monitoring wearables and apps, their current limitations and legal implications. Alb. LJ Sci. Tech. 28, 39 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  • Falter, M., Budts, W., Goetschalckx, K., Cornelissen, V. & Buys, R. Accuracy of Apple Watch Measurements for heart rate and energy expenditure in patients with cardiovascular disease: Cross-Sectional Study. JMIR mHealth uHealth 7, e11889 (2019).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Jamieson, A., Jones, S., Chaturvedi, N., Hughes, A. D. & Orini, M. Accuracy of smartwatches for the remote assessment of exercise capacity. Sci. Rep. 14, 22994 (2024).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Orini, M., G. Guvensen, A. Jamieson, N. Chaturvedi, and A. D. Hughes. Movement, Sweating, and Contact Pressure as Sources of Heart Rate Inaccuracy in Wearable Devices. in 2022 Computing in Cardiology (CinC). 2022. IEEE.

  • Malik, M. et al. Heart rate variability: Standards of measurement, physiological interpretation, and clinical use. Eur. heart J. 17, 354–381 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dekker, J. M. et al. Low heart rate variability in a 2-minute rhythm strip predicts risk of coronary heart disease and mortality from several causes: the ARIC Study. Circulation 102, 1239–1244 (2000).

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaffer, F. & Ginsberg, J. P. An overview of heart rate variability metrics and norms. Front. Pub. Health. 5, 258 (2017).

  • Electrophysiology, T.F.o.t.E.S.o.C.t.N.A.S.o.P. Heart rate variability: standards of measurement, physiological interpretation, and clinical use. Circulation 93, 1043–1065 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sassi, R. et al. Advances in heart rate variability signal analysis: joint position statement by the e-Cardiology ESC Working Group and the European Heart Rhythm Association co-endorsed by the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society. Ep. Europace 17, 1341–1353 (2015).

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Schäfer, A. & Vagedes, J. How accurate is pulse rate variability as an estimate of heart rate variability?: A review on studies comparing photoplethysmographic technology with an electrocardiogram. Int. J. Cardiol. 166, 15–29 (2013).

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Gil, E. et al. Photoplethysmography pulse rate variability as a surrogate measurement of heart rate variability during non-stationary conditions. Physiological Meas. 31, 1271 (2010).

    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaffer, F., Meehan, Z. M. & Zerr, C. L. A critical review of ultra-short-term heart rate variability norms research. Front. Neurosci. 14, 594880 (2020).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Georgiou, K. et al. Can wearable devices accurately measure heart rate variability? A systematic review. Folia Med. 60, 7–20 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  • Linz, D. et al. Atrial fibrillation: epidemiology, screening and digital health. Lancet Regional Health–Europe. 1, 37 (2024).

  • Perez, M. V. et al. Large-scale assessment of a smartwatch to identify atrial fibrillation. N. Engl. J. Med. 381, 1909–1917 (2019).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Tison, G. H. et al. Passive detection of atrial fibrillation using a commercially available smartwatch. JAMA Cardiol. 3, 409–416 (2018).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Bumgarner, J. M. et al. Smartwatch algorithm for automated detection of atrial fibrillation. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 71, 2381–2388 (2018).

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Orini, M. et al. Premature atrial and ventricular contractions detected on wearable-format electrocardiograms and prediction of cardiovascular events. Eur. Heart J.-Digital Health 4, 112–118 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  • Prasitlumkum, N. et al. Diagnostic accuracy of smart gadgets/wearable devices in detecting atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch. Cardiovascular Dis. 114, 4–16 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mannhart, D. et al. Clinical validation of 5 direct-to-consumer wearable smart devices to detect atrial fibrillation. BASEL wearable study Clin. Electrophysiol. 9, 232–242 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  • Strik, M. et al. Validating QT-interval measurement using the Apple Watch ECG to enable remote monitoring during the COVID-19 pandemic. Circulation 142, 416–418 (2020).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoek, L. J., Brouwer, J. L. P., Voors, A. A. & Maass, A. H. Smart devices to measure and monitor QT intervals. Front. cardiovascular Med. 10, 1172666 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  • Saghir, N. et al. A comparison of manual electrocardiographic interval and waveform analysis in lead 1 of 12-lead ECG and Apple Watch ECG: a validation study. Cardiovascular Digital Health J. 1, 30–36 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pengel, L. K. et al. A comparison of ECG-based home monitoring devices in adults with CHD. Cardiol. Young-. 33, 1129–1135 (2023).

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicolò, A., Massaroni, C., Schena, E. & Sacchetti, M. The importance of respiratory rate monitoring: From healthcare to sport and exercise. Sensors 20, 6396 (2020).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumert, M. et al. Mean nocturnal respiratory rate predicts cardiovascular and all-cause mortality in community-dwelling older men and women. Eur. Resp. J. 54, 1 (2019).

  • Varon, C. et al. A Comparative Study of ECG-derived Respiration in Ambulatory Monitoring using the Single-lead ECG. Sci. Rep. 10, 5704 (2020).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Jung, H., Kim, D., Choi, J. & Joo, E. Y. Validating a consumer smartwatch for nocturnal respiratory rate measurements in sleep monitoring. Sensors 23, 7976 (2023).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, I., Stein, J., MacRae, C. & O’Reilly, M. Pulse oximetry values from 33,080 participants in the Apple Heart & Movement Study. NPJ Digital Med. 6, 134 (2023). p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Windisch, P., Schröder, C., Förster, R., Cihoric, N. & Zwahlen, D. R. Accuracy of the apple watch oxygen saturation measurement in adults: a systematic review. Cureus. 15, e35355 (2023).

  • Zhang, Z. & Khatami, R. Can we trust the oxygen saturation measured by consumer smartwatches?. Lancet Respiratory Med. 10, e47–e48 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tryon, W. W., Activity measurement in psychology and medicine. 2013: Springer Science & Business Media.

  • Master, H. et al. Association of step counts over time with the risk of chronic disease in the All of Us Research Program. Nat. Med. 28, 2301–2308 (2022).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Bassett, D. R., Toth, L. P., LaMunion, S. R. & Crouter, S. E. Step counting: a review of measurement considerations and health-related applications. Sports Med. 47, 1303–1315 (2017).

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Buendia, R. et al. Wearable Sensors to Monitor Physical Activity in Heart Failure Clinical Trials: State-of-the-Art Review. J. Cardiac Fail. 30, 703–716 (IEEE, 2024).

  • Bohannon, R. W. & Crouch, R. Minimal clinically important difference for change in 6-minute walk test distance of adults with pathology: a systematic review. J. evaluation Clin. Pract. 23, 377–381 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  • Evenson, K. R. & Spade, C. L. Review of validity and reliability of Garmin activity trackers. J. Meas. Phys. Behav. 3, 170–185 (2020).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Straczkiewicz, M., James, P. & Onnela, J.-P. A systematic review of smartphone-based human activity recognition methods for health research. NPJ Digital Med. 4, 148 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dorn, D. et al. Automatic identification of physical activity type and duration by wearable activity trackers: a validation study. JMIR mHealth uHealth 7, e13547 (2019).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Bassett, D. R. Jr. and E.T. Howley, Limiting factors for maximum oxygen uptake and determinants of endurance performance. Med Sci. Sports Exerc 32, 70–84 (2000).

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartung, G. H., Blancq, R. J., Lally, D. A. & Krock, L. P. Estimation of aerobic capacity from submaximal cycle ergometry in women. Med. Sci. sports Exerc. 27, 452–457 (1995).

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, H. K., Hall, W.D., Hurst, J. W. Clinical methods: the history, physical, and laboratory examinations. (1990).

  • Blair, S. N. et al. Influences of cardiorespiratory fitness and other precursors on cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality in men and women. Jama 276, 205–210 (1996).

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Kodama, S. et al. Cardiorespiratory fitness as a quantitative predictor of all-cause mortality and cardiovascular events in healthy men and women: a meta-analysis. Jama 301, 2024–2035 (2009).

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaccardi, F. et al. Cardiorespiratory fitness and risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus: A 23-year cohort study and a meta-analysis of prospective studies. Atherosclerosis 243, 131–137 (2015).

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Themanson, J. & Hillman, C. Cardiorespiratory fitness and acute aerobic exercise effects on neuroelectric and behavioral measures of action monitoring. Neuroscience 141, 757–767 (2006).

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekblom-Bak, E. et al. Cardiorespiratory fitness and lifestyle on severe COVID-19 risk in 279,455 adults: a case control study. Int. J. Behav. Nutr. Phys. Act. 18, 1–16 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nocon, M. et al. Association of physical activity with all-cause and cardiovascular mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur. J. Preventive Cardiol. 15, 239–246 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, R. et al. Importance of assessing cardiorespiratory fitness in clinical practice: a case for fitness as a clinical vital sign: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation 134, e653–e699 (2016).

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Ltd., F. T. Automated Fitness Level (VO2max) Estimation with Heart Rate and Speed Data. (2014).

  • Apple. Using Apple Watch to Estimate Cardio Fitness with VO2 max. 2021 cited 2024; Available from: https://www.apple.com/healthcare/docs/site/Using_Apple_Watch_to_Estimate_Cardio_Fitness_with_VO2_max.pdf.

  • Molina-Garcia, P. et al. Validity of estimating the maximal oxygen consumption by consumer wearables: a systematic review with meta-analysis and expert statement of the INTERLIVE network. Sports Med. 52, 1577–1597 (2022).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Tran, T., Steiner, J. M., Venkateswaran, A. & Buber, J. Peak oxygen consumption by smartwatches compared with cardiopulmonary exercise test in complex congenital heart disease. Heart. 110, 353–358 (2023).

  • Jamieson, A. et al. Comparison between Smartwatch-Derived and CPET-Measured VO2Max. Computing in Cardiology (CinC) (IEEE, 2024).

  • Loucks, A. B., B. Kiens, and H. H. Wright, Energy availability in athletes. Food, Nutrition and Sports Performance III, 2013: p. 7-15.

  • Seale, J. L., Conway, J. M. & Canary, J. J. Seven-day validation of doubly labeled water method using indirect room calorimetry. J. Appl. Physiol. 74, 402–409 (1993).

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Hills, A. P., Mokhtar, N. & Byrne, N. M. Assessment of physical activity and energy expenditure: an overview of objective measures. Front. Nutr. 1, 5 (2014).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunn, J. A., Navalta, J. W., Fountaine, C. J. & Reece, J. D. Current state of commercial wearable technology in physical activity monitoring 2015–2017. Int. J. Exerc. Sci. 11, 503 (2018).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Moher, D. et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Syst. Rev. 4, 1–9 (2015).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Feigin, V. L. et al. Global, regional, and national burden of stroke and its risk factors, 1990–2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet Neurol. 20, 795–820 (2021).

    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Schutte, A. E., Kollias, A. & Stergiou, G. S. Blood pressure and its variability: classic and novel measurement techniques. Nat. Rev. Cardiol. 19, 643–654 (2022).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Welykholowa, K. et al. Multimodal photoplethysmography-based approaches for improved detection of hypertension. J. Clin. Med. 9, 1203 (2020).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Mukkamala, R. et al. Evaluation of the accuracy of cuffless blood pressure measurement devices: challenges and proposals. Hypertension 78, 1161–1167 (2021).

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Islam, S. M. S. et al. Wearable cuffless blood pressure monitoring devices: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur. Heart J.-Digital Health 3, 323–337 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tan, I. et al. Evaluation of the ability of a commercially available cuffless wearable device to track blood pressure changes. J. hypertension 41, 1003–1010 (2023).

    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Mukkamala, R., Shroff, S. G., Kyriakoulis, K. G., Avolio, A. P. & Stergiou, G. S. Cuffless Blood Pressure Measurement: Where Do We Actually Stand?. Hypertension 82, 957–970 (2025).

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Mukkamala, R. et al. The Microsoft Research Aurora Project: important findings on cuffless blood pressure measurement. Hypertension 80, 534–540 (2023).

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhatt, B. J. et al. Validation of a popular consumer-grade cuffless blood pressure device for continuous 24-hour monitoring. Eur. Heart J.-Digit. Health. 6, 704–712 (2025).

  • Rechtschaffen, A., Bergmann, B. M., Everson, C. A., Kushida, C. A. & Gilliland, M. A. Sleep deprivation in the rat: X. Integration and discussion of the findings. Sleep 12, 68–87 (1989).

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Allebrandt, K. V. et al. Chronotype and sleep duration: the influence of season of assessment. Chronobiol. Int. 31, 731–740 (2014).

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Cappuccio, F. P., D’Elia, L., Strazzullo, P. & Miller, M. A. Sleep duration and all-cause mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies. Sleep 33, 585–592 (2010).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Jike, M., Itani, O., Watanabe, N., Buysse, D. J. & Kaneita, Y. Long sleep duration and health outcomes: a systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression. Sleep. Med. Rev. 39, 25–36 (2018).

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Itani, O., Jike, M., Watanabe, N. & Kaneita, Y. Short sleep duration and health outcomes: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression. Sleep. Med. 32, 246–256 (2017).

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Schyvens, A.-M. et al. Accuracy of Fitbit Charge 4, Garmin Vivosmart 4, and WHOOP Versus Polysomnography: Systematic Review. JMIR mHealth uHealth 12, e52192 (2024).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, T. et al. Accuracy of 11 wearable, nearable, and airable consumer sleep trackers: Prospective multicenter validation study. JMIR mHealth uHealth 11, e50983 (2023).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Altini, M. & Kinnunen, H. The promise of sleep: A multi-sensor approach for accurate sleep stage detection using the oura ring. Sensors 21, 4302 (2021).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Haghayegh, S., Khoshnevis, S., Smolensky, M. H., Diller, K. R. & Castriotta, R. J. Accuracy of wristband Fitbit models in assessing sleep: systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Med. Internet Res. 21, e16273 (2019).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Jerath, R., Syam, M. & Ahmed, S. The future of stress management: integration of smartwatches and HRV technology. Sensors 23, 7314 (2023).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, H.-G., Cheon, E.-J., Bai, D.-S., Lee, Y. H. & Koo, B.-H. Stress and heart rate variability: a meta-analysis and review of the literature. Psychiatry Investig. 15, 235 (2018).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Hackett, R. A. & Steptoe, A. Type 2 diabetes mellitus and psychological stress—a modifiable risk factor. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 13, 547–560 (2017).

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Steptoe, A. & Kivimäki, M. Stress and cardiovascular disease. Nat. Rev. Cardiol. 9, 360–370 (2012).

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Hickey, B. A. et al. Smart devices and wearable technologies to detect and monitor mental health conditions and stress: A systematic review. Sensors 21, 3461 (2021).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, J., Abbod, M. & Shieh, J.-S. Pain and stress detection using wearable sensors and devices—A review. Sensors 21, 1030 (2021).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Alzueta, E. et al. Tracking sleep, temperature, heart rate, and daily symptoms across the menstrual cycle with the Oura ring in healthy women. Int. J. Women’s Health 8, 491–503 (2022).

  • Maijala, A., Kinnunen, H., Koskimäki, H., Jämsä, T. & Kangas, M. Nocturnal finger skin temperature in menstrual cycle tracking: ambulatory pilot study using a wearable Oura ring. BMC Women’s. Health 19, 1–10 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyzwinski, L., Elgendi, M. & Menon, C. Innovative approaches to menstruation and fertility tracking using wearable reproductive health technology: systematic review. J. Med. Internet Res. 15, 26 (2024).

  • Ranjan, Y. et al. RADAR-base: open source mobile health platform for collecting, monitoring, and analyzing data using sensors, wearables, and mobile devices. JMIR mHealth uHealth 7, e11734 (2019).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill, S. K. et al. Consumer wearable devices for evaluation of heart rate control using digoxin versus beta-blockers: the RATE-AF randomized trial. Nat. Med. 30, 2030–2036 (2024).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Wetherell, M. A., Williams, G. & Doran, J. Assessing the psychobiological demands of high-fidelity training in pre-hospital emergency medicine. Scand. J. Trauma, Resuscitation Emerg. Med. 32, 101 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  • Naghavi, M. et al. Global burden of 288 causes of death and life expectancy decomposition in 204 countries and territories and 811 subnational locations, 1990–2021: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021. Lancet 403, 2100–2132 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, G. A. et al. Global burden of cardiovascular diseases and risk factors, 1990–2019: update from the GBD 2019 study. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 76, 2982–3021 (2020).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Lubitz, S. A. et al. Detection of atrial fibrillation in a large population using wearable devices: the Fitbit Heart Study. Circulation 146, 1415–1424 (2022).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Caraballo, C. et al. Clinical implications of the New York heart association classification. J. Am. Heart Assoc. 8, e014240 (2019).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Singhal, A. & Cowie, M. R. Digital health: implications for heart failure management. Cardiac Fail. Rev. 7, 8 (2021).

  • Oldridge, N. B., Guyatt, G. H., Fischer, M. E. & Rimm, A. A. Cardiac rehabilitation after myocardial infarction: combined experience of randomized clinical trials. Jama 260, 945–950 (1988).

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, I.-M. et al. Effect of physical inactivity on major non-communicable diseases worldwide: an analysis of burden of disease and life expectancy. lancet 380, 219–229 (2012).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Stamatakis, E. et al. Association of wearable device-measured vigorous intermittent lifestyle physical activity with mortality. Nat. Med. 28, 2521–2529 (2022).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Ringeval, M., Wagner, G., Denford, J., Paré, G. & Kitsiou, S. Fitbit-based interventions for healthy lifestyle outcomes: systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Med. Internet Res. 22, e23954 (2020).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Menni, C. et al. Symptom prevalence, duration, and risk of hospital admission in individuals infected with SARS-CoV-2 during periods of omicron and delta variant dominance: a prospective observational study from the ZOE COVID Study. Lancet 399, 1618–1624 (2022).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, C. et al. Physiological presentation and risk factors of long COVID in the UK using smartphones and wearable devices: a longitudinal, citizen science, case–control study. Lancet Digital Health 6, e640–e650 (2024).

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan, P., Ryan, N., Chen, D., McNeil, J. & Hopper, I. Novel wearable and contactless heart rate, respiratory rate, and oxygen saturation monitoring devices: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Anaesthesia 77, 1268–1280 (2022).

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Chevance, G. et al. Accuracy and precision of energy expenditure, heart rate, and steps measured by combined-sensing Fitbits against reference measures: systematic review and meta-analysis. JMIR mHealth uHealth 10, e35626 (2022).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Germini, F. et al. Accuracy and acceptability of wrist-wearable activity-tracking devices: systematic review of the literature. J. Med. Internet Res. 24, e30791 (2022).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Irwin, C. & Gary, R. Systematic review of Fitbit charge 2 validation studies for exercise tracking. Transl. J. Am. Coll. Sports Med. 7, 1–7 (2022).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Koerber, D., Khan, S., Shamsheri, T., Kirubarajan, A. & Mehta, S. Accuracy of heart rate measurement with wrist-worn wearable devices in various skin tones: a systematic review. J. Racial Ethn. Health Disparities 10, 2676–2684 (2023).

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Board, L., Ispoglou, T. & Ingle, L. Validity of telemetric-derived measures of heart rate variability: a systematic review. J. Exerc. Physiol. online 19, 64–84 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobbs, W. C. et al. The accuracy of acquiring heart rate variability from portable devices: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sports Med. 49, 417–435 (2019).

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Belani, S., Wahood, W., Hardigan, P., Placzek, A. N. & Ely, S. Accuracy of detecting atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of wrist-worn wearable technology. Cureus. 13, 12 (2021).

  • Giebel, G. D. & Gissel, C. Accuracy of mHealth devices for atrial fibrillation screening: systematic review. JMIR mHealth uHealth 7, e13641 (2019).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Hermans, A. N. et al. Mobile health solutions for atrial fibrillation detection and management: a systematic review. Clin. Res. Cardiol. 111, 479–491 (2022).

  • Lopez Perales, C. R. et al. Mobile health applications for the detection of atrial fibrillation: a systematic review. EP Europace 23, 11–28 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nazarian, S., Lam, K., Darzi, A. & Ashrafian, H. Diagnostic accuracy of smartwatches for the detection of cardiac arrhythmia: systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Med. Internet Res. 23, e28974 (2021).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Evenson, K. R., Goto, M. M. & Furberg, R. D. Systematic review of the validity and reliability of consumer-wearable activity trackers. Int. J. Behav. Nutr. Phys. Act. 12, 1–22 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  • Feehan, L. M. et al. Accuracy of Fitbit devices: systematic review and narrative syntheses of quantitative data. JMIR mHealth uHealth 6, e10527 (2018).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Henriksen, A., Johansson, J., Hartvigsen, G., Grimsgaard, S. & Hopstock, L. Measuring physical activity using triaxial wrist worn polar activity trackers: a systematic review. Int. J. Exerc. Sci. 13, 438 (2020).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Leung, W., Case, L., Sung, M.-C. & Jung, J. A meta-analysis of Fitbit devices: same company, different models, different validity evidence. J. Med. Eng. Technol. 46, 102–115 (2022).

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Driscoll, R. et al. How well do activity monitors estimate energy expenditure? A systematic review and meta-analysis of the validity of current technologies. Br. J. sports Med. 54, 332–340 (2020).

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenyon, A., McEvoy, M., Sprod, J. & Maher, C. Validity of pedometers in people with physical disabilities: A systematic review. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehab 94, 1161–1170 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  • Birrer, V., Elgendi, M., Lambercy, O. & Menon, C. Evaluating reliability in wearable devices for sleep staging. npj Digital Med. 7, 74 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  • Imtiaz, S. A. A systematic review of sensing technologies for wearable sleep staging. Sensors 21, 1562 (2021).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Rentz, L. E., Ulman, H. K. & Galster, S. M. Deconstructing commercial wearable technology: contributions toward accurate and free-living monitoring of sleep. Sensors 21, 5071 (2021).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, H., Lack, L. & Lovato, N. A systematic review of the accuracy of sleep wearable devices for estimating sleep onset. Sleep. Med. Rev. 49, 101227 (2020).

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 



    • Link

    4
    Related Topics:
    Continue Reading
    Click to comment

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    Technology

    Gaming Headset Market reaching an estimated USD 7 billion by 2034

    Published

    23 hours ago

    on

    December 15, 2025

    By


    Gaming Headset

    Gaming Headset

    Pune, India – December 15, 2025 – Exactitude Consultancy, a global leader in market research and intelligence, today announced the publication of its Gaming Headset Market Report, delivering a detailed analysis of industry trends, segmentation, competitive landscape, and growth forecast through 2034. This report equips manufacturers, gaming peripheral brands, distributors, investors, and technology stakeholders with actionable insights into the evolving gaming audio accessory ecosystem.

    Download Full PDF Sample Copy of Market Report @ https://exactitudeconsultancy.com/request-sample/70022

    Market Overview

    The global gaming headset market was valued at approximately USD 3.6 billion in 2024 and is projected to grow at a CAGR of 7.1 % over the forecast period (2025-2034), reaching an estimated USD 7 billion by 2034. Growth is driven by rising eSports participation, immersive gaming demand, and technological advancements in audio features.

    Key Growth Drivers & Trends

    • eSports & Online Gaming Boom: Global expansion of competitive gaming amplifies demand for high performance headsets that offer superior positional audio and communication clarity.

    • Technological Innovation: Enhanced features such as noise cancellation, surround sound, wireless connectivity, and spatial audio are increasingly integrated, improving player immersion and comfort.

    • Streaming & Content Creation: Growth in gaming streaming and content production influences headset demand, as creators seek high quality audio capture and playback.

    • Casual & Mobile Gamers: A broadening gamer base – especially casual players – continues to drive headset adoption for both competitive play and entertainment.

    Market Segmentation

    The report segments the gaming headset market by:

    • Product Type: Wired and wireless gaming headsets. Wired remains significant due to low latency, while wireless is rising with improved battery tech and convenience.

    • Application: Gaming, music, virtual reality (VR), and streaming usage.

    • End User: Casual gamers, professional gamers, and eSports athletes.

    • Technology: Surround sound, noise cancellation, RGB lighting, built in microphones – key immersive and functional features driving differentiation.

    • Distribution Channel: Online retail, offline retail stores, and direct manufacturer sales.

    Explore Full Report here: https://exactitudeconsultancy.com/reports/70022/gaming-headset-market

    Regional Insights

    • North America remains the largest regional market, accounting for about 40 % of global revenue, buoyed by a strong gaming culture and high accessory spend.

    • Asia Pacific is a dynamic growth region with an ~10 % CAGR, driven by expanding middle class gaming populations and significant eSports adoption in China, Japan, and SEA.

    • Europe shows solid growth supported by widespread console and PC gaming infrastructure.

    • Latin America and Middle East & Africa are among the fastest growing emerging regions with projected double digit regional CAGRs by 2034.

    Competitive Landscape

    The gaming headset market is highly competitive with both established brands and specialized gaming audio companies. Key players include:

    • Logitech

    • Razer

    • Corsair

    • SteelSeries

    • HyperX

    • ASUS

    • Turtle Beach

    • Sennheiser

    • JBL

    • Creative Labs

    These companies continually innovate with features such as spatial audio, advanced noise suppression, enhanced wireless protocols, and ergonomic design to meet diverse gamer preferences.

    Market Challenges

    Challenges facing the market include price competition and saturation in certain product tiers, as well as evolving platform compatibility requirements across PC, console, mobile, and VR devices.

    Strategic Importance

    Gaming headsets have become essential peripherals for modern gaming ecosystems, influencing play experience, communication, and competitive performance. As the gaming sector – including casual, competitive, and VR gaming – continues to expand, high fidelity audio gear remains a key differentiator for brands and consumers alike.

    This report is also available in the following languages : Japanese (ゲーミングヘッドセット市場), Korean (게이밍 헤드셋 시장), Chinese (游戏耳机市场), French (marché des casques de jeu), German (Markt für Gaming-Headsets), and Italian (Mercato delle cuffie da gioco), etc.

    Request for a sample of this research report at (Use Corporate Mail ID for Quick Response) @ https://exactitudeconsultancy.com/request-sample/70022

    Our More Reports:

    Standalone Trackpad Market

    https://exactitudeconsultancy.com/reports/33610/standalone-trackpad-market

    Virtual Reality Devices Market

    https://exactitudeconsultancy.com/reports/34652/virtual-reality-devices-market

    Professional Monitors Market

    https://exactitudeconsultancy.com/reports/35764/professional-monitors-market

    About Us

    Exactitude Consultancy is a market research & consulting services firm which helps its client to address their most pressing strategic and business challenges. Our market research helps clients to address critical business challenges and also helps make optimized business decisions with our fact-based research insights, market intelligence, and accurate data.

    https://bulletin.exactitudeconsultancy.com/

    https://www.thehealthanalytics.com/

    https://www.analytica.global/

    https://www.marketintelligencedata.com/

    https://www.marketinsightsreports.com/

    https://exactitudeconsultancy.com/

    Connect Us:

    Irfan Tamboli

    PHONE NUMBER +1 (704) 266-3234

    EMAIL ADDRESS: sales@exactitudeconsultancy.com

    This release was published on openPR.



    Link

    4
    Continue Reading

    Technology

    UM-Flint event sees Corunna, Davison win top esports honors | News

    Published

    2 days ago

    on

    December 14, 2025

    By


    Games including Rocket League, Marvel Rivals, Super Smash Bros, Mario Kart 8, and others.



    FLINT, Mich. (WJRT) – The University of Michigan-Flint’s College of Innovation & Technology joined forces with the Michigan High School Esports Federation to host the fall 2025 state finals event.

    More than 120 teams and 350 players from over 70 schools across the state participated in the event on Saturday.

    Eleven champions were crowned in games such as Rocket League, Marvel Rivals, Super Smash Bros, and Mario Kart 8.

    “It’s amazing. It’s my first time in a tournament or anything,” said Corunna esports player Jackson Donley.

    “Especially in person, and the atmosphere is just amazing. You can tell it’s tense, especially when the matches are so close,” Donley said.

    Corunna Middle School secured first place in the middle school division of the Team Super Smash Bros competition.

    Davison High School claimed first place in the high school division.



    Link

    5
    Continue Reading

    Technology

    Retro Cartoon Tech Accessories : Higround x SEGA

    Published

    3 days ago

    on

    December 13, 2025

    By


    The Sonic the Hedgehog collection, a renewed collaboration between lifestyle gaming peripheral brand Higround and SEGA, highlights a design concept that merges retro nostalgia with modern performance engineering. Drawing from the cultural legacy of Sonic the Hedgehog and the visual language of the Dreamcast era, the collection introduces peripherals that blend archival aesthetics with contemporary functionality. This release also expands Higround’s product range “through updated 75% and 96% keyboard layouts and the introduction of a Hall Effect model, each referencing the theme of Sonic’s characteristic speed.”

    The ‘Summit 65+,’ presented in a Dreamcast-inspired design, features a CNC aluminum case, stainless steel back plate, and Higround’s ‘Dampening Plus’ five-layer system for a stable, quiet typing experience. The ‘Basecamp 65HE,’ influenced by the Radical Highway level, debuts Hall Effect technology for increased precision. Additional offerings—including the Classic Sonic–themed ‘Basecamp 96+,’ two ‘Basecamp 75+’ versions inspired by Escape from the City and Sonic CD, a Sonic CD keycap set, and four coordinated XL mousepads—further unify the collection’s nostalgic yet contemporary character.

    Image Credit: Higround



    Link

    11
    Continue Reading

    Technology

    How Miami’s Sports Culture Reflects the High-Energy Mindset Driving Today’s Tech Innovations – Five Reasons Sports Network

    Published

    3 days ago

    on

    December 13, 2025

    By


    The Competitive Spirit That Powers Both Sports and Startups

    Miami sports fans know that greatness comes from more than talent alone. Whether it’s the Heat grinding through a tight fourth quarter or the Dolphins executing a perfectly timed offensive scheme, winning requires discipline, fast thinking, and an unshakeable competitive spirit. Interestingly, these same qualities power the tech and startup world, where entrepreneurs make split-second decisions that can define the future of an entire business.

    In both arenas, success belongs to those who can read momentum, adapt under pressure, and turn small opportunities into game-changing wins. That overlap is why so many sports-minded individuals naturally thrive in the world of business, innovation, and technology.

    Why Analytics in Sports Fuel Smarter Business Thinking

    Today’s sports landscape is driven by analytics—shot charts, win probability graphs, EPA metrics, and possession efficiency numbers are all part of modern fan knowledge. This analytical mindset doesn’t stop at the arena. Tech entrepreneurs, founders, and investors rely on the same data-driven thinking to navigate product decisions, market shifts, and competition.

    This crossover is why the startup world attracts problem solvers shaped by sports culture. And platforms in the entertainment-tech space—such as Foxy gold casino—reflect this growing connection between digital innovation, predictive thinking, and user engagement.

    Understanding Momentum: A Shared Advantage for Founders and Athletes

    Momentum is everything. In sports, a single run, turnover, or three-pointer can change the energy in seconds. In business, momentum might be a viral post, a successful beta launch, or hitting a major funding milestone. Leaders in both fields understand how to recognize momentum and capitalize on it.

    This parallels perfectly:

    • Athletes ride hot streaks.
    • Founders capitalize on traction.
    • Sports teams adjust mid-play.
    • Startups pivot product strategy just as quickly.

    The ability to shift gears on the fly is one of the most important skills in sports and tech alike.

    Building a Winning Strategy: What Startups Can Learn From Miami Sports

    1. Scouting and Research Matter

    Sports teams invest heavily in scouting reports and film studies. They evaluate:

    • Opponent strengths
    • Player tendencies
    • Lineup matchups
    • Efficiency ratings

    Startups mirror this with market research, user interviews, competitive analysis, and data modeling. Knowing the landscape allows founders to execute smarter, faster, and with more confidence.

    2. Team Culture Determines Long-Term Success

    The Miami Heat built the “Heat Culture,” known for discipline, conditioning, and accountability. Startups adopting similar cultural principles see major benefits:

    • Clear leadership and communication
    • Defined expectations
    • Continuous improvement
    • Resilience under pressure

    A strong culture is often the difference between a startup that scales—and one that collapses.

    3. Adaptability Separates Winners From the Rest

    Sports demand constant adjustments: defensive rotations, halftime strategies, and clutch-time decisions. Startups face equally rapid shifts:

    • Market changes
    • New competitors
    • Shifting user demand
    • Technological breakthroughs

    Founders who adapt quickly, without losing their vision, stay competitive.

    Table: Business Lessons Inspired by Miami’s Sports Playbook

    Miami Sports Principle Startup Application Tech/Innovation Impact
    Heat Culture Strong internal systems Higher productivity & retention
    Film study & analytics Market and user research Better decision-making
    In-game adjustments Product pivots Faster adaptation to trends
    Team chemistry Cross-functional collaboration Smoother product scaling
    Game-winning mentality Resilient leadership Strong long-term growth

    How Miami’s Fast-Paced Environment Fuels Innovation

    South Florida’s sports scene is known for energy, excitement, and bold plays. Coincidentally, Miami’s startup scene mirrors that same intensity. The city has quickly become a hub for fintech, AI, gaming, and digital entertainment. Entrepreneurs here are used to speed—speed of execution, iteration, and scaling.

    A few reasons Miami is thriving in the innovation sector:

    • Diverse global talent
    • High investor interest
    • Strong tech community backing
    • Growing digital entertainment market
    • Crossover influence from sports and media

    Miami is one of the few cities where sports culture and startup culture genuinely feed each other.

    Technology Is Changing the Game—On the Field and in the Office

    Technology has reshaped sports with player-tracking systems, real-time analytics, and dynamic stat models. Meanwhile, tech startups use automation, AI-driven insights, and SaaS platforms to accelerate growth. Both industries depend on innovation to stay ahead.

    Today’s fans and founders alike have access to tools such as:

    • Predictive analytics
    • Machine learning insights
    • Automated reporting dashboards
    • Real-time performance tracking
    • Competitive intelligence platforms

    This shared tech ecosystem keeps both sports teams and startups laser-focused on performance.

    The Role of Mindset: What Makes Sports Fans Natural Innovators

    Sports fans understand pressure. They analyze plays, debate strategies, track performance trends, and anticipate outcomes. These instincts make them naturally suited for entrepreneurship and tech leadership.

    Key mindset overlaps include:

    • Confidence under pressure
    • Long-term thinking
    • Understanding risk and reward
    • Embracing competition
    • Continuous improvement

    Sports create thinkers who thrive in fast-paced, unpredictable environments—the exact conditions startups face daily.

    Why the Connection Between Sports and Startups Keeps Growing

    Sports influence is everywhere—from data modeling to team culture to leadership strategy. At the same time, tech continues to elevate sports through analytics, digital enhancements, and real-time engagement tools. The crossover strengthens every year, especially in vibrant markets like Miami.

    As both industries push forward, one thing remains true: the mindset that wins games is the same mindset that builds the next big company. Athletes, analysts, fans, and founders all share a core advantage—a competitive drive, sharpened by strategy, that fuels consistent growth.



    Link

    7
    Continue Reading

    Technology

    Lakeview Academy unveils renovated Innovation and Technology Wing

    Published

    3 days ago

    on

    December 13, 2025

    By


    Lakeview Academy in Gainesville recently unveiled its newly renovated Innovation and Technology Wing.

    The learning environment is designed to inspire creativity, collaboration, and hands-on problem-solving.

    “The expanded robotics and esports facilities give our students room to imagine bigger and build bolder,” Technology Director Mikhail Lovell, said. “With advanced tools like industrial laser cutters and high-performance 3D printers, they can design and create with a level of precision and freedom that we couldn’t offer before. This renovation strengthens the programs our students already love while opening the door to new opportunities for innovation, growth, and achievement.”

    School officials said the renovation was made possible through Lakeview donors and community partners who share in the school’s mission to cultivate curiosity, excellence, and forward-thinking leadership.

    “This renovation represents more than just new facilities,” John Simpson, Head of School at Lakeview Academy, said. “It is an investment in our students’ future and a reflection of Lakeview’s vision to provide a learning environment that mirrors the innovation and collaboration found in today’s leading industries.”



    Link

    8
    Continue Reading

    Technology

    All Winners List for The Game Awards 2025 Revealed

    Published

    4 days ago

    on

    December 12, 2025

    By


    The Game Awards 2025 concluded on December 11 in Los Angeles, celebrating a standout year in gaming. The ceremony unveiled the full All Winners List across major categories, including Game of the Year, Best Art Direction, Best Narrative, and more. Fans tuned in worldwide to see whether Clair Obscur Expedition 33, Death Stranding 2 On the Beach, or Donkey Kong Bananza would claim top honors.

    This year delivered an unusually competitive field. Nearly every major genre saw multiple critically acclaimed releases. The All Winners List highlights how diverse the gaming landscape has become, rewarding innovation, storytelling, performance, and design. Below is the complete breakdown of winners as confirmed during the live show.

    Full All Winners List for The Game Awards 2025

    The Game Awards recognized excellence across more than 30 categories. The All Winners List below reflects the official results announced during the broadcast. These selections were made through a combination of jury voting and fan participation. Trusted outlets such as Reuters and AP covered the event throughout the week, citing its global impact on the entertainment industry.

    The ceremony featured wins for established franchises, emerging studios, and standout indie titles. Clair Obscur Expedition 33 dominated several major categories, cementing its status as one of the year’s most influential releases. Death Stranding 2 On the Beach and Hollow Knight Silksong also secured notable wins across art, music, and direction.

    How and where to watch video game awards 2025How and where to watch video game awards 2025

    The winners list includes categories such as:

    • Game of the Year
    • Player’s Voice
    • Best Game Direction
    • Best Adaptation
    • Best Narrative
    • Best Art Direction
    • Best Score and Music
    • Best Audio Design
    • Best Performance
    • Innovation in Accessibility
    • Games for Impact
    • Best Ongoing Game
    • Best Community Support
    • Best Independent Game
    • Best Debut Indie Game
    • Best Mobile Game
    • Best VR/AR Game
    • Best Action Game
    • Best Action/Adventure Game
    • Best RPG
    • Best Fighting Game
    • Best Family Game
    • Best Sim/Strategy Game
    • Best Sports/Racing Game
    • Best Multiplayer Game
    • Most Anticipated Game
    • Content Creator of the Year
    • Best Esports Game
    • Best Esports Athlete
    • Best Esports Team

    Each winner reflects the shifting trends of interactive entertainment. Publishers invested heavily in cinematic storytelling, AI-driven mechanics, and world-building. Indie studios saw renewed recognition, demonstrating how smaller teams continue to push creative boundaries.

    How the 2025 All Winners List Shapes the Industry

    The impact of the All Winners List extends far beyond the ceremony. Industry analysts note that Game Awards recognition often boosts sales, renews franchise momentum, and influences publisher strategies for the following year. Reuters reported that award-winning titles typically experience a significant rise in global downloads after the show’s conclusion.

    For indie creators, nominations and wins can accelerate distribution partnerships and platform support. For major studios, standout wins in categories such as Game Direction or Narrative reinforce creative leadership and help guide long-term development pipelines.

    The All Winners List also redirects attention toward emerging technologies showcased in nominated titles. VR advancements, accessibility innovations, and audio engineering breakthroughs from this year’s winners are expected to shape next-generation game design approaches.

    The Game Awards 2025 All Winners List underscores how far the medium has evolved. It highlights a year defined by risk-taking, creativity, and boundary-pushing design. Fans now look ahead to 2026 as studios aim to build on the momentum created by this remarkable lineup of winners.

    FYI (keeping you in the loop)-

    Q1: What is included in The Game Awards 2025 All Winners List?

    The list includes winners across more than 30 categories, covering major genres and industry achievements. Categories range from Game of the Year to Best Esports Team.

    Q2: Which game won the most awards in 2025?

    Clair Obscur Expedition 33 earned multiple major category wins, reflecting strong critical and fan support.

    Q3: Why is The Game Awards All Winners List important?

    The list influences sales trends, industry recognition, and future project investment decisions. It sets expectations for upcoming releases.

    Q4: How are winners selected for The Game Awards?

    A combined jury and public voting system determines winners. Both professional critics and global players contribute.

    Q5: Does winning an award impact game development studios?

    Recognition often leads to increased funding, hiring, and platform visibility. It can also validate creative direction for future titles.

    iNews covers the latest and most impactful stories across
    entertainment,
    business,
    sports,
    politics, and
    technology,
    from AI breakthroughs to major global developments. Stay updated with the trends shaping our world. For news tips, editorial feedback, or professional inquiries, please email us at
    [email protected].

    Get the latest news and Breaking News first by following us on

    Google News,
    Twitter,
    Facebook,
    Telegram
    , and subscribe to our
    YouTube channel.





    Link

    7
    Continue Reading

    Most Viewed Posts

    Trending