Connect with us

NIL

Alex Karaban's return to UConn again shows pull of NIL is keeping more top college athletes around

Posted May 5, 2025You’ve probably heard plenty about the supposedly negative effects of name, image, and likeness and the immediate eligibility component of the NCAA transfer portal on the sport of college basketball. But the release of the NBA’s preliminary early entry list offered a substantial statement about the competitive strength of the sport. (Sporting […]

Published

on

Alex Karaban's return to UConn again shows pull of NIL is keeping more top college athletes around


You’ve probably heard plenty about the supposedly negative effects of name, image, and likeness and the immediate eligibility component of the NCAA transfer portal on the sport of college basketball. But the release of the NBA’s preliminary early entry list offered a substantial statement about the competitive strength of the sport.
(Sporting News)


Related:

Michigan football scandals: Recruiting, Connor Stalions, Sherrone Moore suspension
Michigan football’s off-field troubles from the past couple of years continued Monday, with coach Sherrone Moore facing a two-game suspension for his involvement with the…

NBC wants to bring excitement of Michael Jordan player intro back to NBA
If you are of a certain age and fondly remember the NBA on NBC and the Michael Jordan Era, there is one iconic thing that…

Former UNC wide receiver Gavin Blackwell transfers to Florida State
Gavin Blackwell has found a new home, one that will keep him in the Atlantic Coast Conference. Blackwell has committed to Florida State. The former…

Preparations Underway For ‘Once-In-A-Lifetime’ Metallica Concert At Virginia Tech’s Lane Stadium
With the Lane Stadium sod cleared and the field level prepped on Friday, Metallica’s crew went about laying the floor for next week’s much-anticipated concert…

Alex Karaban's return to UConn again shows pull of NIL is keeping more top college athletes around

Related Links

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

NIL

Judge approves House settlement, paving the way for schools to pay athletes

Big changes are coming to college sports. A judge has approved the NCAA’s “House settlement,” allowing schools to start paying athletes directly for the first time. Starting July 1st, schools can share up to $20.5 million a year with players, mainly in football and men’s basketball. That number could grow each year. The NCAA and […]

Published

on


Big changes are coming to college sports. A judge has approved the NCAA’s “House settlement,” allowing schools to start paying athletes directly for the first time.

Starting July 1st, schools can share up to $20.5 million a year with players, mainly in football and men’s basketball. That number could grow each year.

The NCAA and power conferences (SEC, Big Ten, Big 12, ACC) also agreed to pay nearly $2.8 billion to athletes who played between 2016 and 2024 for past lost earnings from name, image, and likeness (NIL) opportunities.

To make sure the money is handled fairly, a new group called the College Sports Commission will oversee all payments and rules. It’s separate from the NCAA and will enforce new limits, like a salary cap and roster sizes.

This means that any new agreement between an athlete and a third party — such as a business, brand, booster, or collective — must be reviewed and approved by the Deloitte-managed NIL clearinghouse.

Known as “NIL Go,” this clearinghouse will evaluate all NIL deals worth over $600 to ensure they meet fair market value standards. Deals that don’t meet these standards may be rejected, and athletes who accept unapproved offers could risk losing their eligibility.

This marks a major shift from the past when athletes were not paid directly and NIL rules were loosely enforced.

Lawmakers are now working on a federal law to protect the NCAA and schools from future lawsuits as a result of the settlement.

A new era of college sports is finally here.





Link

Continue Reading

NIL

What House vs. NCAA settlement approval means for Alabama athletics

A look at Alabama football’s Walk of Champions at Bryant-Denny Stadium VIDEO: A brief tour of the Walk of Champions at Alabama football’s Bryant-Denny Stadium: Statues, commemorating championships and more. The House vs. NCAA settlement allows schools to share revenue with athletes and provides damages for past NIL inequities. Alabama athletics will operate under a […]

Published

on


play

  • The House vs. NCAA settlement allows schools to share revenue with athletes and provides damages for past NIL inequities.
  • Alabama athletics will operate under a salary cap, starting at over $20 million annually, with most going to football and men’s basketball.
  • Athletes can still pursue NIL deals, but a new commission will increase oversight and enforcement.
  • Roster limits will be implemented, but current athletes won’t be immediately affected.

Change has officially come for collegiate athletics.

After the House vs. NCAA settlement was approved on Friday, June 6, ending three antitrust lawsuits which addressed compensation for collegiate athletes, schools are now permitted to share revenue with their athletes directly while also issuing $2.8 billion in damages for former and current athletes who were not able to capitalize on NIL − name, image and likeness − deals.

Starting July 1, when these changes officially come into effect, Alabama athletics will be forced to navigate immense change, one that includes roster limits, salary caps and a new enforcement agency.

Here’s what the settlement means for Alabama athletics.

What is Alabama athletics salary cap?

According to the settlement, the initial annual allotment is expected to start at more than $20 million per school in 2025-26 and grow to $32.9 million in 2034-35.

The cap sits at 22% of the combined total of certain revenues like ticket sales, television deals and sponsorships.

Most power conferences plan to give 90% of that allotment to football and men’s basketball programs, according to Yahoo Sports. The rest would be shared amongst the other sports like women’s basketball, baseball and softball.

Will Alabama still have third-party NIL deals?

Yes, Alabama athletes will still have the ability to collect income from partnerships with third parties for NIL deals like businesses, boosters and collectives.

But those deals will come under more scrutiny moving forward.

The newly-formed College Sports Commission will oversee, implement and enforce the settlement, making “determinations regarding potential rules violations and penalties, provide notice and opportunity to be heard, participate in the arbitration process and ultimately administer penalties for violations of these rules,” their announcement said.

What roster limits does Alabama face under House vs. NCAA settlement?

The House vs. NCAA settlement will bring roster limits to collegiate athletics. However, that change could come more slowly than instantaneous.

According to a modification in the final settlement, all class members whose roster spots were taken away or would have been taken away will be exempt from roster limits for the duration of their careers.

However, with the settlement, a roster cap for each sport will be imposed with schools permitted to provide scholarships for each member of the roster, but doesn’t have to.

This past November, Alabama athletics director Greg Byrne told The Tuscaloosa News “there will be value that we’re playing on a similar playing field when it comes to scholarships.”

“What I am hopeful for is we can have a model that gives us the opportunity to have strong, broad-based programming and the ability to be competitive from a revenue-sharing standpoint and give as many young people as possible the opportunity to go to school and compete as a college athlete,” Byrne said.

According to Yahoo Sports, the SEC plans to issue 85 football scholarships even with a roster limit of 105 slots, giving teams the ability to keep walk-on athletes.

Colin Gay covers Alabama football for The Tuscaloosa News, part of the USA TODAY Network. Reach him at cgay@gannett.com or follow him @_ColinGay on X, formerly known as Twitter. 



Link

Continue Reading

NIL

NCAA football news: Gamers can help their team earn NIL money on College Football 26

The post NCAA football news: Gamers can help their team earn NIL money on College Football 26 appeared first on ClutchPoints. Already, EA Sports College Football 26 is generating plenty of buzz a month before release. Speculation about Bill Belichick’s appearance is certainly palpable. Advertisement In addition, players will be paid $ 1,500 for appearing […]

Published

on


The post NCAA football news: Gamers can help their team earn NIL money on College Football 26 appeared first on ClutchPoints.

Already, EA Sports College Football 26 is generating plenty of buzz a month before release. Speculation about Bill Belichick’s appearance is certainly palpable.

Advertisement

In addition, players will be paid $ 1,500 for appearing in the game, an increase from $600 in the previous year’s game. Those same players could receive NIL money thanks to the gamers themselves, per Darren Rovell of CLLCT media.

Schools featured in the game could get paid based on how frequently gamers play with their team—a radically innovative approach in the era of NIL for college athletes.

Athletes will be able to showcase their talents broadly through the game. The players’ exposure could land them sponsorship deals as well as grow their fan bases.

Furthermore, the players will have their name, image, and likeness on full display throughout the game. Before the NIL era, gamers would solely have to come up with names for players.

Advertisement

The players also have the option to opt in or opt out of this deal, allowing them to maintain control over how they utilize their NIL. From a gaming perspective, this sparks a significant shift from the way things were prior to NIL.

The evolution of gaming and NIL 

Before the NIL era, college athletes were barred from earning money from their name, image, and likeness. That included appearances on EA Sports games.

The straw that broke the camel’s back was the historic O’Bannon vs. NCAA case. In 2009, former UCLA basketball player Ed O’Bannon filed a lawsuit against the NCAA

He claimed its amateurism rules illegally prevented college athletes from being compensated for their name, image, and likeness.  This derived after seeing his image featured on EA Sports’ NCAA Basketball 09 without his consent, nor did he receive any compensation.

Advertisement

The outcome resulted in schools being allowed to offer athletic scholarships covering full cost of attendance. In addition, the case ruled that schools could place up to $5,000 into a trust for each athlete to use their NIL.

Thus paving the way for where we are now regarding video games.

Related: Former MLB exec to be new head of College Sports Commission

Related: Judge approves NCAA House Settlement allowing schools to pay players



Link

Continue Reading

NIL

House vs NCAA settlement approval: Louisville, Kentucky next steps

The revenue-sharing era of college sports has finally arrived. How will Louisville and Kentucky respond? About five years after its filing, the seminal House v. NCAA lawsuit has reached a resolution. Its settlement received final approval from Judge Claudia Wilken Friday. The agreement will provide $2.8 billion in back damages to athletes who could not […]

Published

on



The revenue-sharing era of college sports has finally arrived. How will Louisville and Kentucky respond?

About five years after its filing, the seminal House v. NCAA lawsuit has reached a resolution. Its settlement received final approval from Judge Claudia Wilken Friday.

The agreement will provide $2.8 billion in back damages to athletes who could not profit off their name, image and likeness between 2016 and Sept. 15, 2024. It also does away with scholarship limits, instead imposing roster caps (with an optional grandfathering-in model to protect athletes in possession of spots from being cut), and establishes a revenue-sharing system in which athletics departments pay players directly. The projected revenue-sharing cap for 2025-26 is $20.5 million and will increase annually by 4%.

During a University of Louisville Athletics Association meeting in April, athletics director Josh Heird called the settlement “the most transformative shift this industry has ever seen.” In that same meeting, Heird outlined two main questions the department is considering when it comes to the settlement: 

“How we’re gonna implement it, and how we’re gonna fund it.”

Heird declined to share how Louisville will split the $20.5 million among its varsity sports when asked by The Courier Journal at ACC spring meetings. Front Office Sports reported that power conference schools are expected to dedicate 75% of the $20.5 million toward their football programs. Texas Tech’s reported breakdown gives 74% to football, 17% to 18% to men’s basketball, 2% to women’s basketball, 1.8% to baseball and the rest to other sports. That’s $15.17 million for football, $3.69 million for men’s basketball and $410,000 for women’s basketball.

Kentucky athletics director Mitch Barnhart told The Courier Journal at SEC spring meetings that rather than establishing firm percentages for each program, UK will take a less rigid approach to meet each sport’s needs year in and year out.

“The beauty of the cap space is that it is relatively fluid,” Barnhart said. “There may be years where different programs need more than the other, so I think that the management of that will be really, really important through our compliance folks.”

Meanwhile, NIL agreements via collectives will still be in play. Many collectives will transition into more of a marketing agency structure to help negotiate contracts and expand athlete earning potential beyond revenue-sharing contracts. This is what Louisville will do with 502Circle, President Dan Furman told The Courier Journal. 

Furman said he will still be involved in roster construction and day-to-day negotiations between athletes, local businesses and U of L. Once an agreement is reached, Louisville’s legal team (counseled by former Green Bay Packers Vice President Andrew Brandt) will draw up a deal. Meanwhile, 502Circle will continue to lean into promotional content as it has over the last 18 months or so with Floyd Street Media to help grow athletes’ profiles and endear them to the local community.

“We’re built for longevity,” Furman told The Courier Journal. “We’re built for what’s next. We’re not just pay-for-play.”

The collective reportedly worked with a transfer portal budget of $8 million to $10 million for men’s basketball this offseason. That fund helped coach Pat Kelsey land one of the nation’s top portal classes. But starting June 11, all NIL deals exceeding $600 will have to be reported to and pass through a clearinghouse called “NIL go,” operated by Deloitte with the purpose of assessing athletes’ fair market value.

Officials from the clearinghouse have been sharing data about past deals with athletics directors and coaches over the last several weeks, including 

Those numbers are a far cry from the millions collectives have reportedly spent on athletes over the last four years or so. Constricting compensation in this way feels, to some, like a bit of a step backward.

SEC commissioner Greg Sankey spoke about the clearinghouse at spring meetings. When asked directly if he had confidence in these guardrails, Sankey said yes.

“People are going to have opinions,” he continued. “Nothing ever worked when people sat around and said, ‘Well, this won’t work.’ We’re adults, we’re leaders, and I think I communicated this yesterday, we have a responsibility to make this work.”

Barnhart is one of 10 athletics directors on the House Settlement Implementation Committee, which helped come up with the idea for the clearinghouse. He is the second-longest-tenured Power Four athletics director, having worked at UK since 2002. Barnhart views his responsibility as follows:

“I think it’s real important that the decisions we make on the House Implementation Committee are what’s in the best interest of college athletics as a whole,” Barnhart told The Courier Journal. “… I would say, probably, there’s been 10 to 15 years worth of work that’s been done in eight to 12 months. So a lot of work has been channeled into a pipeline, and a lot of folks have worked awfully hard to get ready for this change in college athletics.”

Reach college sports enterprise reporter Payton Titus at ptitus@gannett.com, and follow her on X @petitus.



Link

Continue Reading

NIL

Former No. 1 recruit Addisen Fisher enters the transfer portal

UCLA lost another pitcher on Friday. 2024 Softball America No. 1 recruit Addisen Fisher has entered the transfer portal after her freshman year with the Bruins. Fisher, a native of Bend, Ore., threw 113.2 this season. She had a 16-2 record with a save and 2.59 ERA. According to our friends at 64Analytics, she had […]

Published

on

Former No. 1 recruit Addisen Fisher enters the transfer portal

UCLA lost another pitcher on Friday. 2024 Softball America No. 1 recruit Addisen Fisher has entered the transfer portal after her freshman year with the Bruins. Fisher, a native of Bend, Ore., threw 113.2 this season. She had a 16-2 record with a save and 2.59 ERA.

According to our friends at 64Analytics, she had a 3.66 xFIP (A version of FIP that normalizes the home run component based on a league-average home run-to-fly ball rate), which was a tad better than All-Americans Sydney Berzon and Robyn Herron.

Fisher was used in relief quite often; half of her appearances came from the bullpen. In her 16 starts, she had six complete games, with three coming in Big Ten play.

The Bruins’ once deep pitching staff has dissolved quickly after losing rising junior pitcher Kaitlyn Terry to the portal earlier in the week.

For more transfer portal news, stay up to date with the Softball America transfer wire and the Dugout, our discussion board for members.

More from Softball America:
2027 Pitcher Recruiting Rankings
2027 Catcher Recruiting Rankings
2027 Middle Infield Rankings

Continue Reading

NIL

Report: EA Sports College Football 26 to pay schools based on game usage

When EA Sports College Football 26 comes out in July, schools will be compensated in a new way. Payouts will be determined by the amount of time users play as teams in the video game, cllct’s Matt Liberman reported. Documents obtained by cllct show a new structure for royalties from the video game, which made […]

Published

on


When EA Sports College Football 26 comes out in July, schools will be compensated in a new way. Payouts will be determined by the amount of time users play as teams in the video game, cllct’s Matt Liberman reported.

Documents obtained by cllct show a new structure for royalties from the video game, which made its return last year. CLC Learfield will play a central role in the process, according to the documents, and it’s a shift from last year when the company said it couldn’t historically tie sales of the game to specific schools.

The royalty process is also a change from last year’s tier system. Schools were placed into one of four tiers based on the previous 10 years of final AP poll results, and that determined the revenue distribution. Now, it appears to be based on the time users spend playing as a school.

In a sample scenario from cllct, the total royalties in a university pool would be $5 million with 700 million games played. If users play 7 million games as School A, the school’s allocation would be 1%. Therefore, School A would receive $50,000.

“For each CFB product released by EA SPORTS, we (CLC Learfield) will provide a percentage for each institution based on the games played for that institution as a percentage of the total games played across all institutions,” a document says. “This percentage of games played will become the final allocation percentage for each school that will be applied to the total gross royalties for all institutions received.”

EA Sports College Football 26 will look to build on the success of College Football 25, which became the largest new console game launch in North America in 2024. EA also announced the video game had seen 6.5 million unique players to date. Quick math shows EA brought in more than $400 million in sales from the game.

This year’s standard edition cover will also feature two sophomore wide receivers – Ohio State’s Jeremiah Smith and Alabama’s Ryan Williams. Additionally, the deluxe addition features a mix of current college football stars, head coaches and legends, as well as fans in the background.

EA Sports also released a trailer May 29, providing an inside look at gameplay. It also showed new features such as “Enter Sandman” by Metallica before a Virginia Tech game, as well as some of the coaches in the game, such as Ohio State’s Ryan Day and Texas’ Steve Sarkisian.



Link

Continue Reading

Most Viewed Posts

Trending