Connect with us
https://yoursportsnation.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/call-to-1.png

NIL

Club World Cup 2025 preview

Published

on

Club World Cup 2025 preview

The 2025 Fifa Club World Cup has been called many things.

For Fifa president Gianni Infantino, the architect of the revamped 32-team tournament, it will be “the pinnacle of elite professional men’s club football”. At the other end of the scale, LaLiga president Javier Tebas has dismissed it as “not necessary”.

The pair’s differing views on the Club World Cup are a microcosm of the divisive nature of a new-look competition that promises much but has yet to totally convince the wider soccer community.

It has been nearly a decade since Infantino first mentioned the idea of an expanded, quadrennial Club World Cup, which since 2005 has been held annually over ten days in December and featured only seven teams.

Since the tournament overhaul was confirmed at the end of 2022, the intervening period has been dominated by concerns over player workload, fan apathy, unprecedented legal action, and delays in announcing commercial and broadcast partners.

Ahead of kick-off on 14th June, SportsPro examines where key stakeholders stand on the Club World Cup and what it all means for soccer over the next month and beyond.


What are Fifa’s hopes for the competition?

Fifa had wanted to launch a reimagined Club World Cup in 2021 but those plans were delayed by the Covid-19 pandemic. After pivoting to 2025 for the tournament, world soccer’s governing body announced the US as host in June 2023.

The 32-team format takes inspiration from the former structure of the Fifa World Cup (which is growing to 48 teams from 2026) and represents a deliberate move by soccer’s governing body to replicate the success of its flagship national team tournament.

This iteration of the Club World Cup is very much the pet project of Infantino, who has his sights set on establishing a globally recognised club tournament that, as he put it, will be “more interesting for teams, and also for fans around the world”.

For all Infantino’s talk of “an unforgettable celebration of our game”, Fifa also wants the competition to drive new revenues. Indeed, the aim is for the Club World Cup to become the organisation’s second most lucrative event, behind only the men’s World Cup.

These lofty goals stand in stark contrast to the attitude of Infantino’s predecessor Sepp Blatter, who admitted last year that creating the Club World Cup “was a mistake” and said Fifa should “concern itself with national federations, not clubs”.

After all, Fifa’s decision to move further into the club game has been viewed in some quarters as an attempt to take some of the market share of European soccer’s governing body Uefa, which currently operates the most lucrative club competition in the form of the Champions League.

Uefa president Aleksander Ceferin has taken several swipes at the competition and pointed out the impact it will have on player workload. Last year, speaking to the Guardian, the Slovenian claimed the Club World Cup “will be tiring” and said it won’t be a very interesting competition, arguing that “the Europeans will win everything”.


What will it reveal about America’s World Cup preparations?

The 63-game Club World Cup is being held across 11 cities at 12 different stadiums in the US, with the final taking place at MetLife Stadium in New Jersey.

The other venues are Mercedes-Benz Stadium in Atlanta, TQL Stadium in Cincinnati, Hard Rock Stadium in Miami, Geodis Park in Nashville, Bank of America Stadium in Charlotte, Rose Bowl Stadium in Los Angeles, Lincoln Financial Field in Philadelphia, Lumen Field in Seattle, Audi Field in Washington DC and Orlando’s Camping World Stadium and Inter&Co Stadium.

The tournament will serve as a trial of sorts for the US before it co-hosts the 2026 World Cup alongside Canada and Mexico. The States will also have skin in the game for the opening match of the Club World Cup when Inter Miami face Egypt’s Al Ahly.

Despite a Major League Soccer (MLS) team featuring Lionel Messi kicking things off, ticket sales for the curtain raiser have been sluggish. This was highlighted at the start of June by the cost of tickets for the match being less than a sixth of their original price of US$349.

Fifa has remained bullish about the Club World Cup gaining traction in the US and anticipates ticket sales to increase as the tournament progresses. Infantino declared in April that he was unconcerned about empty stadiums.

“When I see some of the stadiums in the United States filling itself when some teams are coming to play some friendly games, exhibition games, then I’m not worried at all to fill a stadium when teams are coming to play a World Cup, to play for, you know, something, something real,” he said.

Lionel Messi’s Inter Miami kick off the Club World Cup against Al Ahly (Image credit: Getty Images)


What happened with the broadcast rights?

Fifa was believed to be seeking media rights revenue of US$4 billion for the Club World Cup, which would have equated to each game costing a hefty US$63.5 million for a prospective global broadcast partner.

Preliminary interest was lukewarm. Apple reportedly tabled a bid but it was a quarter of what Fifa was holding out for. The governing body then held briefings with television executives in an attempt to drum up interest.

It was a reality check for Fifa, whose own direct-to-consumer (DTC) platform had to stream the tournament’s previous format in several countries, while rights in major markets like the UK frequently changed hands between broadcasters who didn’t deem it a worthwhile long-term investment.

In the end, DAZN became the Club World Cup’s exclusive global broadcast partner in a deal reportedly worth US$1 billion. The company will stream all games for free as part of an arrangement that included the option to sub-license games to free-to-air (FTA) broadcasters in local markets.

DAZN has subsequently struck various deals, including with TNT Sports and TelevisaUnivision in the US, Channel 5 in the UK, Sat.1 in Germany, and SportyTV in multiple African countries.

Even so, sublicensing agreements with the biggest broadcasters in major markets have largely proved elusive. Channel 5, for instance, has comfortably the smallest audience of the UK’s five traditional terrestrial networks.

Fifa will still be hoping those FTA deals give the Club World Cup the exposure needed to build its prestige and profile, while DAZN has struck partnerships with the likes of TikTok and podcast production company Goalhanger to promote its coverage across other platforms.

Even so, doubts remain over whether DAZN can achieve a return on its investment after such a large outlay for the rights.


Why were sponsors slow to sign up?

The delay in announcing a broadcast partner will have contributed to the reluctance from companies to sponsor the Club World Cup, which also will have been fuelled by the lack of concrete information about the event and several big teams not playing. It wasn’t until October 2024 that Chinese electronics brand Hisense signed on as the tournament’s first partner before beer giant Anheuser-Busch InBev followed a month later.

Since then, more sponsors have been trickling in, with Adidas, Bank of America, Coca-Cola, Lenovo and Qatar Airways now onboard. All of them have preexisting relationships with Fifa.

Another notable partner is Saudi Arabia’s Public Investment Fund (PIF), which is also an investor in DAZN through SURJ Sports Investment. The sovereign wealth fund penned a long-term deal this month to further deepen Fifa’s ties to the kingdom, which was announced as host of the 2034 World Cup and inked a lucrative deal with state-owned oil firm Aramco in April last year.

Fifa had reportedly been trying to convince its top-tier sponsors to strike separate deals for the Club World Cup, which reportedly resulted in a legal dispute with Coca-Cola and Adidas, both of whom believed their existing top-tier agreements should have included the new competition.

Even though both are now involved in the competition, it is unclear how that dispute was resolved, while it is also not known if Fifa’s target of more than US$100 million per sponsor has been met.  

What is apparent, though, is that this Club World Cup has not been an easy sell.

Coca-Cola was reportedly among the top-tier Fifa sponsors which felt its existing deal should have covered the Club World Cup (Image credit: Getty Images)


What do the clubs make of it all?

Teams from each of the six international soccer confederations will be at the Club World Cup. There were 12 places made available for European clubs, more than any of the other confederations.

The initial uncertainty around the Club World Cup meant Spanish heavyweights Real Madrid did not budget for any income from the tournament. Their manager at the time Carlo Ancelotti had already gone as far as saying that Los Blancos would “refuse the invitation”. The Italian was later corrected by Real and said his comments were misinterpreted.

Fifa has since revealed a US$1 billion prize fund for the Club World Cup, with the winners set to pocket US$125 million. Teams will share US$525 million in participation fees, but this pot will not be distributed evenly. For example, the appearance fees going to Europe’s clubs will be on a sliding scale from US$38.19 million at the top end to US$12.81 million at the bottom, determined by a ranking based on ‘sporting and commercial criteria’.

A further US$475 million has been made available to reflect sporting performance at the tournament, where teams will play a maximum of seven matches. A group-stage win will be worth US$2 million while US$40 million is the prize for winning the final.

Fifa has stressed it will not keep a single dollar from the Club World Cup, with all the money going back into the club game. It also hopes to be able to distribute up to US$250 million in solidarity to non-participating clubs.

Participating clubs may be licking their lips at the sums on offer but there are concerns about the distortive impact of prize money from international club tournaments on competitive balance at domestic level.

There is also the matter of European sides returning to competitive action mere weeks after their domestic seasons ended, adding pressure to an already cluttered calendar long considered by many to be at breaking point.


How have the players reacted?

Manchester City midfielder Rodri warned last September that players could strike in protest at an increase in games. Should City reach the final, there will only be a five-week gap between that match and the first Premier League game of the 2025/26 campaign.

Indeed, Premier League chief executive Richard Masters has publicly criticised Fifa for failing to consult domestic leagues over its plans for the Club World Cup and said that the tournament will create “great difficulty” for the participating English sides in preparing for the new season.

A month after Rodri’s comments, player unions and leagues took legal action against Fifa over the scheduling of the Club World Cup.

The complaint to the European Commission from global players’ union FifPro and the European Leagues, which represents competitions in more than 30 countries across Europe, assert the international soccer calendar is ‘oversaturated’ and ‘risks player safety and wellbeing’.

Fifa has said it “is not responsible for calendar congestion” and “is only responsible for a small percentage of matches per season”. The governing body added that it would formalise a task force on player welfare to “promote further global dialogue on player welfare issues with key stakeholders across football”.

Bayern Munich’s Joshua Kimmich is a notable high-profile player looking forward to the Club World Cup, but the wider reaction has been decidedly mixed.

The criticism hasn’t been limited to player welfare either. Earlier this month, Seattle Sounders players wore shirts reading ‘Club World Ca$h Grab’ in protest over how bonuses from participating in the tournament are being distributed. The move was supported by the MLS Players Association.

One of the words Fifa seems keen to associate with the Club World Cup is ‘opportunity’. It believes players can showcase their talents on a global stage, clubs can earn significant revenue, and that supporters have the chance to watch an elite tournament on TV for free. Yet there are still major challenges to address, from financial fairness to fan engagement.

This Club World Cup may not be the finished article, but it needs to show signs this summer that it can become one if Fifa is to realise its ambition for the competition.


Get your daily briefing of all the essential news across the sports industry with the SportsPro Daily Newsletter. Subscribe here.

NIL

Colleges ponying up in support of football coaches, programs

Published

on


Ole Miss football is among the most well-supported programs in the country, backed by the Grove Collective, widely regarded as one of the nation’s most organized name, image and likeness groups.

It’s not LSU, though, and that, Lane Kiffin said, is one of the biggest reasons he left Oxford for Baton Rouge. LSU’s financial backing is among the best in the nation, and Kiffin said it played a major role in his decision to choose the Tigers.

“Tell me the numbers and the plan for what the money is for the players, because that’s everything in that area to me,” Kiffin said. “Not what I make — what they make, to understand how you can build this.”

LSU isn’t the only school promising its coaches the resources to build competitive rosters. Several programs — including Michigan State, Penn State, Arkansas and Auburn — have announced major financial commitments aimed at program-building.

At Michigan State, the school received a $401 million donation from Acrisure co-founder Greg Williams and his wife, Dawn, with $290 million earmarked for athletics. It is the largest gift in school history and better positions the Spartans to compete in college sports’ revenue-sharing era.

Newly hired coach Pat Fitzgerald, who dealt with limited NIL resources at Northwestern, will now have far more to work with as he tries to return Michigan State to Big Ten contention.

Arkansas is also working to reshape its football budget. Athletic director Hunter Yurachek hired Ryan Silverfield as Razorbacks coach and vowed to elevate the school’s spending from near the bottom of the SEC to a more competitive level. At Silverfield’s introductory news conference, Yurachek acknowledged Arkansas’ investment had lagged behind the rest of the conference.

“The top-down alignment of a new financial commitment from our board of trustees, the university, the department of athletics and so many generous donors … was the first step to being all in on this goal,” Yurachek said. “This financial commitment will push us to the top half in key SEC items such as our assistant coaches’ pool, strength and conditioning staff, support staff pool, and our talent acquisition through revenue sharing and legitimate NIL.”

Another Big Ten program, Penn State, hired Matt Campbell from Iowa State to replace James Franklin. Since the hire, Penn State has reportedly committed around $30 million in NIL resources, according to reporter Matt Fortuna, on top of Campbell’s reported eight-year contract. That level of investment was hinted at after Penn State moved on from Franklin. Athletic director Pat Kraft made clear in October that the school intended to operate near the top of the national spending landscape.

“This is also about the modern era of college football,” Kraft said. “Our next coach needs to be able to maximize elite-level resources, attack the transfer portal and develop at the highest level.”

At Auburn, newly hired Alex Golesh said during his opening news conference that he will have “every resource known to man.” The Tigers’ administration believed former coach Hugh Freeze had strong enough support, but Auburn posted a 15-19 record during his tenure.

Even schools that aren’t changing coaches are investing more in their programs. Maryland athletic director Jim Smith reaffirmed the school’s commitment to Mike Locksley, promising to direct more resources into Locksley’s team.

“Coach Locksley, Senior Deputy Athletic Director Diana Sabau and I will review every aspect of our football program to make sure we are focused on getting the right type of resources in the right places to build a successful football program in this new era of college football,” Smith wrote in an online letter to fans.

This season, teams such as Vanderbilt, Virginia and Texas Tech have achieved success that outpaces their recent history. Revenue sharing and NIL commitments help make that more of a possibility.

The new wave of financial commitments around football programs introduces another layer to a coaching cliché. Coaches used to say, “It’s not the X’s and O’s, but the Jimmys and the Joes.” Now, more than ever, it’s about the Benjamins.





Link

Continue Reading

NIL

Chambliss adds AT&T NIL deal after strong season at Ole Miss – HottyToddy.com

Published

on


Trinidad Chambliss did not expect his season to unfold this way.

The Ole Miss quarterback arrived in Oxford as a transfer hoping to compete, learn, and settle into a steady role.

Instead, he finished the fall as a First-Team SEC selection and one of the most talked-about players in college football.

His latest news added another step to his rise, as Chambliss announced a major name, image, and likeness partnership with AT&T.

The deal was revealed through a national commercial that used humor and the language of the transfer portal.

In the ad, Chambliss sits in a living room with friends as they ask whether he plans to “transfer.”

After a pause, he answers, “If you wanna win, you go with the best.”

The twist — he is “transferring” to AT&T, not a new program. It was a simple message, delivered with ease and confidence, and it signaled how far his public profile has grown.

Chambliss admitted in the commercial that the moment still feels unusual.

He said he would have thought someone was “crazy” if they had predicted he would be in this type of spotlight. But his play changed everything, and his journey from Ferris State to Ole Miss became one of the most followed stories across the SEC.

His season took shape after starting quarterback Austin Simmons went down with an early injury. That opened the door for Chambliss to get his chance.

He quickly took hold of the job, lifted the offense, and kept the Rebels stable in a year when the margin for error was tight.

From the moment he stepped in, Chambliss brought command and mobility. His ability to run and throw gave Ole Miss a balanced attack that fit well with its personnel.

Over the final two months, he ranked among the league’s top quarterbacks and helped Ole Miss stay in the postseason race.

The Rebels believed they had solid depth entering the year, but Chambliss offered something more. He became the center of the team’s identity and one of the clearest examples of how the transfer portal can reshape a season.

Even Arkansas fans, watching as the Razorbacks navigated roster changes, saw how one player’s move could shift a program’s direction.

Heading into winter, Chambliss’ name carried weight both on and off the field, and companies noticed.

The AT&T deal became the latest sign his impact is reaching far beyond the box score.

Production places Chambliss among SEC’s best

Chambliss completed 218 of 333 passes for 3,016 yards, 18 touchdowns and three interceptions. His consistency helped Ole Miss settle into its offensive rhythm as the season progressed.

He also rushed 118 times for 470 yards and six touchdowns, finishing with 3,486 total yards.

His statistical rise showed how quickly he adapted to SEC play. For long stretches, he averaged more than 300 yards per game and kept drives alive with timely scrambles and smart reads.

Coaches praised his decision-making and his willingness to manage tough moments without forcing plays.

Chambliss often talked about the role his time at Ferris State played in shaping his mindset.

At the Division II level, he won awards and led a successful offense, but he believed taking a step to the SEC would show him a different level of competition. That belief proved correct, and he handled the transition with poise.

As Ole Miss piled up wins, attention grew. His leadership steadied the Rebels during close games, and fans responded to his calm presence. National media outlets highlighted his story, and discussions about his future expanded.

It was during that rise that NIL interest intensified.

The AT&T announcement confirmed the momentum. Though financial terms were not disclosed, the partnership showed that corporations now view college quarterbacks as voices capable of appealing to broad audiences.

It also reflected the changing nature of college football. NIL deals shape the landscape, and a player like Chambliss now balances his on-field duties with growing visibility off it.

Programs across the SEC, including the Hogs, track these developments closely. NIL structure affects recruiting, retention, and how players evaluate their opportunities.

Chambliss’ deal served as another example of how today’s game operates.

What comes next for Ole Miss quarterback

For the Rebels, the deal supports the program’s wider goals. Chambliss has become a central figure and a dependable leader for a team seeking long-term stability.

His growth reinforces what Ole Miss wants to build moving forward, both in recruiting and in performance.

Chambliss said the journey has been unpredictable but rewarding. He remains focused on his development as he balances new expectations and responsibilities. The next steps in his career will hold weight as Ole Miss prepares for its future on offense.

Key takeaways

  • Trinidad Chambliss secured a major NIL partnership with AT&T after a strong season at Ole Miss.

  • His rise from backup to First-Team SEC quarterback showed the power of the transfer portal.

  • The shifting NIL landscape, which affects programs like the Razorbacks, continues to reshape college football.



Link

Continue Reading

NIL

Scott Frost found another fall guy to blame for his own failings

Published

on


As the Nebraska football team prepares for its second straight bowl game, UCF and Scott Frost are doing a post-mortem on just why they suffered through another losing season. To the surprise of no one, when Frost talked about what went wrong and how he would fix things, he did not point the finger at himself. Instead, he lined up another fall guy. This time, the blame fell on NIL and the transfer portal.

“It’s broken,” Frost said during the Signing Day press conference. “College football’s broken. Yeah, I don’t know if you’ll get that honest answer from everyone, but everyone would agree if they were honest.”

It’s worth pointing out that the former Nebraska football coach isn’t saying anything that many failed coaches have said before him. Even if he tried to paint it as though he was departing some never-before-heard wisdom.

Former Nebraska coach Scott Frost blames NIL, transfer portal for UCF’s losing season

Frost then told a story that may or may not have actually happened.

“I laugh about it now, but I did my press conference last year and had a couple players and their agents waiting outside my office five minutes after I did my press conference to start telling me how much money I needed to pay them, and I didn’t even know who the kids were.”

“We’re going to know our team now. We’re going to know our strengths and weaknesses. I think we’re in a better financial position to approach this.”

This is hardly the first time that the former Nebraska coach and storied quarterback blamed forces beyond his control for his failures. It’s not even the first time he’s done it since joining UCF. He spent most of his first offseason with the Knights last year, blaming everyone but him at Nebraska for his getting fired after 4.5 seasons.

Frost has demonstrated plenty of times that he hasn’t changed much since he ran Nebraska. That’s bad news for UCF fans who are hoping for improvements in 2026 after the team went 5-7 this season and was a late rally away from going 1-8 in the Big 12 with a loss to the worst team in the conference. Who will be the fall guy next year if Scott Frost does that again.





Link

Continue Reading

NIL

Predicting the College Football Playoff after Georgia wins SEC title over Alabama

Published

on


Coming into the SEC Championship Game, there was a kind of consensus that both Georgia and Alabama would make the College Football Playoff no matter what. Almost no matter what.

All that had to happen was that Alabama lost a close game to Georgia, and they would be in. Sixty minutes later, the Bulldogs may have finally disproved that theory.

Kirby Smart notched a needed and rare win over the Crimson Tide in dominating fashion to win the SEC championship, avenging the team’s one regular season loss, and potentially throwing Kalen DeBoer’s team right out of the national title hunt a second-straight season.

Until now, we had maintained that Alabama would stay in the playoff even with a loss to Georgia, but the nature of how that loss played out could finally pave the way to resolve the biggest controversy facing the selection committee coming into Selection Day.

Predicting the College Football Playoff bracket after Georgia beat Alabama

College Football Playoff bracket rankings prediction after Georgia beat Alabama for SEC championship

Brett Davis-Imagn Images

Subject to change pending other Championship Saturday results

1. Ohio State. We’re still projecting that the Buckeyes will finish the season undefeated by handing Indiana its first loss and claim the Big Ten championship, ensuring their hold on the No. 1 overall seed in the playoff.

2. Georgia. A dominant win over Alabama to avenge their one regular season loss and win the SEC championship helps propel the Bulldogs into the No. 2 seed and likely ends its counterpart’s playoff ambitions.

3. Texas Tech. One of college football’s most dominant defenses had a day against BYU, forcing four turnovers en route to a signature Big 12 championship victory and taking a firm hold on a first-round playoff bye.

4. Indiana. We still expect the Hoosiers’ prospective loss to Ohio State to be close enough, combined with IU’s total resume, to keep them in the top four and get the bye.

5. Oregon. That one loss the Ducks had this season came against Indiana, so they should stay behind their Big Ten counterpart as a result.

6. Ole Miss. No Lane Kiffin, no problem. The selectors showed no indication they’ll punish the Rebels after the coach’s departure, so we should see them host a first-round game in the playoff.

College Football Playoff bracket rankings prediction after Georgia beat Alabama for SEC Championship

Maria Lysaker-Imagn Images

7. Texas A&M. Undefeated until the regular season finale, that loss cost the Aggies a shot at the SEC title, but they’ve done enough to host a game in the first round.

8. Oklahoma. That strong defense helped put the Sooners back into the playoff picture, and it’s there they stay, but it’ll be up to John Mateer and the offense to live up to their end of the bargain to keep them there.

9. Notre Dame. The selectors kept the Irish ahead of the Hurricanes despite their head-to-head loss in the opener, and they should move ahead one spot after the Alabama loss.

10. Miami. There was a chance that Alabama could stay in the bracket even by losing to Georgia, but the nature of that loss could be enough for the selectors to move the Hurricanes back in, but still possibly behind the Irish team they beat given how insistent the committee has been to preserve that ordering.

11. Virginia. We still expect the Cavaliers will do enough to save the ACC some major embarrassment and beat Duke for the conference title.

12. Tulane. A strong defensive outing helped propel the Green Wave to a victory over North Texas to win the American championship and stay as the Group of Five’s highest-ranked team.

What the College Football Playoff would look like today

12 Tulane at 5 Oregon
Winner plays 4 Indiana

11 Virginia at 6 Ole Miss
Winner plays 3 Texas Tech

10 Miami at 7 Texas A&M
Winner plays 2 Georgia

9 Notre Dame at 8 Oklahoma
Winner plays 1 Ohio State

More college football from SI: Top 25 Rankings | Schedule | Teams

Follow College Football HQ: Bookmark | Rankings | Picks



Link

Continue Reading

NIL

10 most-expensive buyouts of the 2025 college football coaching carousel

Published

on


Brother, can you spare $200 million? Apparently, ten top college football programs could (collectively) in 2025, as the sum total of the 10 highest buyouts paid in the college football coaching cycle added up to that figure. It’s worth recalling that these teams paid over $200 million to NOT be coached by ten decidedly unpopular and now former head coaches. Of course, some of these buyouts are subject to mitigation, which will reduce the ultimate amount. Others might be settled (including one listed that already was settled).

Here is a rundown of the ten highest-dollar buyouts being endured in the 2025 college football coaching roundup.

10. Brent Pry (Virginia Tech, $6 million)

Pry was ditched after an 0-3 start to the 2025 season, which left him at 16-24 in his Virginia Tech tenure. On the bright side, Pry’s $6 million buyout was relatively affordable, freeing Tech to make a splash with its next coaching hire… about whom we have more to say.

9. James Franklin (Penn State, $9 million)

One guy who comes out of the coaching shifts smelling like a rose is Franklin. Franklin was owed somewhere between $47 million and $54 million by Penn State, which would have placed him likely second on this list. He negotiated a much lower buyout figure, moved on to his next job, and freed Penn State to secure another viable head coach.

8. Sam Pittman (Arkansas, $9.8 million)

Pittman was 32-34 at Arkansas and was given the boot. He’s still very much in the realm of (relatively) affordable buyouts and hiring Memphis’ Ryan Silverfield shouldn’t break the bank for the Hogs.

7. Justin Wilcox (California, $10.9 million)

Wilcox was 48-55 at Cal and never won over eight games in a season at the school. Oregon coordinator Tosh Lupoi is the new Bears boss.

6. Mike Gundy (Oklahoma State, $15 million)

The decline of Gundy has been one of the more surprising dips in college football. He was 170-90 at Oklahoma State, finished in the top ten in 2021, and won 10 games in 2023. But he’s out and North Texas’s Eric Morris got the nod for the job.

5. Hugh Freeze (Auburn, $15.8 million)

On the other hand, Freeze’s departure was incredibly predictable. In three seasons at Auburn, he was 15-19 and failed to post a winning season. Freeze’s contract reportedly included no mitigation clause, so the Tigers are on the hook regardless of where and when Freeze finds his next coaching role.

4. Billy Napier (Florida, $21 million)

Napier seemed to have survived a rough season at Florida after a late rally last year led to an 8-5 finish. But after a brutal early 2025, he was cut loose with a career 22-23 mark. Even his hefty buyout did not stock Florida from reportedly offering Lane Kiffin $13 million per year to coach the Gators before Florida ended up going after Tulane’s Jon Sumrall as their consolation prize.

3. Jonathan Smith (Michigan State, $33.5 million)

In actual gameplay, Smith was 9-15 in two seasons. Five of the wins were vacated by the NCAA, but even giving him the full benefit of 24 games, a buyout of over $1.3 million per actual game coached is something. To say nothing of nearly $4 million per game won (or over $8 million per NCAA-credited win).

2. Mark Stoops (Kentucky, $38 million)

Formerly the longest-tenured coach in the SEC, Stoops was sent packing after two straight non-bowl seasons. His 72 wins (actually 82 before some NCAA retrospective tinkering) is a Kentucky record. His willingness to allow the University to space out the $38 million instead of paying it in full in 60 days was indicated as a positive part of Kentucky’s ability to make a quick transition to Oregon offensive coordinator Will Stein.

1. Brian Kelly (LSU, $54 million)

Unlike the stories of James Franklin and Mark Stoops, it doesn’t sound like Kelly has gone quietly into the night. After initial disagreements, Kelly filed suit to try to claim every cent of the $54 million he contends that LSU is contractually obligated to pay him. The university seemingly backed down by admitting that his firing was without cause. Kelly was 34-14 at LSU, which certainly threw caution to the wind despite the massive buyout with a huge contract for new coach Lane Kiffin.





Link

Continue Reading

NIL

Texas Tech beats BYU for Big 12 title, likely CFP 1st-round bye

Published

on


ARLINGTON, Texas — Texas Tech’s all-in bet just paid off.

After an offseason of big dreams and bigger spending, the No. 4 Red Raiders secured their first Big 12 championship in program history Saturday with a 34-7 rout of No. 11 BYU.

It was another dominant display from a 12-1 squad, unlike any seen in Lubbock, one that fuels even more confidence about a deep College Football Playoff run.

After the confetti fell inside AT&T Stadium and coach Joey McGuire hoisted a trophy he had been chasing for four years, he fought back tears as he embraced billionaire board chair Cody Campbell, general manager James Blanchard, athletic director Kirby Hocutt and the many stakeholders who helped set up this program for a historic season.

Together, they ended decades of frustration for a Texas Tech football program that hadn’t won an outright conference title since 1955. When the Red Raiders built their trophy room as part of their $242 million new training facility, they reserved a space for a Big 12 trophy.

In place of hardware, a small block rested on the trophy stand with one word printed on it: “BELIEVE.”

For McGuire, the tears started in the final minutes against BYU, but he said they’ll be flowing again when he returns to Texas Tech’s football building Saturday night and walks past that block.

“That’s when it’s really going to hit me,” McGuire said. “And then, we’ll move it to another space so we can go get another trophy.”

Texas Tech assembled what can now be called one of the greatest transfer portal classes of this evolving era of NIL and transfers in college football, a group of 22 incoming transfers that yielded 11 players who started in the Big 12 title game, four first-team All-Big 12 performers and a projected first-round draft pick in pass rusher David Bailey.

Blanchard believed from the beginning that the Big 12 was not equipped to compete with what the Red Raiders had assembled. The results of that ambitious roster-building experiment: Every Texas Tech victory has been by more than 21 points.

“Mission accomplished,” Blanchard told ESPN. “It’s proof of concept. We’ve got an opportunity to go win a national championship, and I like our chances.”

Texas Tech’s more than $25 million investment for its 2025 roster, blending proven returning starters with high-profile newcomers, created boom-or-bust stakes and a seasonlong narrative — that the Red Raiders were desperately trying to buy their way to the top.

Even after defeating BYU on Saturday, Texas Tech players were asked to respond to the perception that they had built “the best team money could buy.” Linebacker Jacob Rodriguez, a returning senior and the Big 12’s Defensive Player of the Year, was happy to answer that one.

“If we are going to buy a team,” Rodriguez replied, “why not be the best?”

Campbell offered no apologies as he watched Red Raiders coaches and players celebrate Saturday.

“I’m just so proud,” Campbell told ESPN. “The credit goes to the guys who are actually in the arena. These men love each other. They played so hard, so tough. I’m just so proud of this staff, I’m so proud of the university and the alignment we have, all the support we’ve gotten from so many people. It’s been a team effort, the whole effort, the whole way.

“We all came together and had a singular mission, a singular focus, and we got it done. This is something we’ve been waiting on a long time at Texas Tech.”

They got it done with a Red Raiders defense that, as it has this season, made BYU’s offense fight for every yard.

The Cougars opened the game with a well-scripted, 14-play, 90-yard touchdown drive that took nearly seven minutes. They mustered just 110 yards on 45 plays the rest of the day and turned it over four times in the second half, including two interceptions by Tech linebacker Ben Roberts.

“I think we can play with anybody in the country,” Campbell said.

The championship victory should guarantee a top-four seed for Texas Tech and a first-round bye in the College Football Playoff. McGuire said the three-week break ahead will be much needed for his team to recover and prepare for its first playoff run.

“We’re football banged-up,” McGuire said. “If you let us get healthy, I really believe we’ve got another gear.”

Quarterback Behren Morton has been playing with a hairline fracture in his fibula that forced him to miss two games, including the Red Raiders’ lone loss to Arizona State. Morton told ESPN he’s feeling “about 70 percent” healthy and is looking forward to more recovery time.

The quarterback and his coach privately agreed in June that they would win a Big 12 championship this year. And when they did, they planned to walk off the field at AT&T Stadium together.

Before Morton grabbed the game ball, threw his arm around his coach and headed to a locker room filled with celebration and cigar smoke, the senior offered a prideful grin.

“There were a lot of people saying preseason that Texas Tech better do it,” Morton said. “Well, guess what? We did it.”



Link

Continue Reading

Most Viewed Posts

Trending