In the high-stakes world of college football, timing is everything. And Tulane just made a power move that could redefine how NIL works in the American Athletic Conference.

On the heels of Louisiana Governor Jeff Landry’s groundbreaking executive order allowing state schools to directly pay athletes for their name, image, and likeness, Tulane didn’t blink. The Green Wave is already sprinting ahead of the pack.

Advertisement

Starting July 1, Tulane will bring NIL operations under university control—a seismic shift from third-party collectives. In doing so, the program positions itself to take full advantage of a changing landscape that’s seen programs across the country scramble for structure amidst the murky prelude to the House settlement.

“The proposed House settlement allows universities to manage all these operations,” Tulane athletic director David Harris said in a recent release. “We’ll oversee everything from fundraising to NIL payments in one streamlined model.”

And they’re not short on resources. The school received a $3.5 million private donation to launch the Green Wave Fund, which will fuel Tulane’s NIL payouts moving forward. This means Tulane athletes could begin receiving direct compensation before the 2025-26 season even begins—legally and without NCAA interference.

What’s more, once the House settlement is finalized, Tulane will be among schools eligible to share up to $20.5 million in revenue with its student-athletes annually. The American Athletic Conference has already set a $10 million minimum for NIL distribution—Tulane’s proactive stance ensures it won’t just meet that mark; it could very well set the bar.

Advertisement

This new era isn’t just about attracting talent—it’s about keeping it. With the ability to directly invest in its players, Tulane has a new tool to retain rising stars and build long-term momentum on the field.

For fans following NIL developments, Tulane’s strategy offers a model worth watching. With institutional backing, a multi-million dollar NIL fund, and zero legal risk, the Green Wave isn’t dipping a toe in the water—it’s diving headfirst into the future of college football.

Related: USC star recruit stands out for donation to high school program

Related: Kirby Smart’s bold take on NIL says everything about College Football’s future

College football has a problem. At least some think it does. NIL is giving the kids too much money. The Transfer Portal has ruined loyalty among the kids today. You don’t have to scroll far on Twitter, “X”, or your favorite message board to hear the complaints. So, what can be done? President Trump has decided to step in to “rescue” college sports. He has tapped one of the most prominent names in college football to help lead it: Nick Saban. Can the President’s Nick Saban Commission fix it, or are we kidding ourselves?

If CFB Has a Problem, Can the Saban Commission Fix It?

The President Forms the Saban Commission

President Trump was in Tuscaloosa two weeks ago to give the commencement address at the University of Alabama. During his visit, he visited with Tuscaloosa’s head of state, Nick Saban. According to reports by Yahoo’s Ross Dellenger, the two men talked about the state of college football and what needs to be done to “fix” its problems. Once Trump returned to Washington, D.C., he began working on creating the Saban Commission to fix college football’s problems. Saban and Texas Tech Booster extraordinaire Cody Camble would head up the committee.

What Are The Problems Surrounding College Football?

The Saban Commission will reportedly be tasked with trying to “fix” some of the problems surrounding football. Here is a high-level overview of the four main issues from sources close to the White House. We’ve also included some juicy sound bites from some of the voices of college football related to each problem.

Transfer Portal & Player Movement
College athletes switch schools more frequently, making it harder for teams to build chemistry and stability. Critics say it’s starting to feel more like professional free agency than college sports.

“It’s free agency without contracts. That’s what we’re dealing with.” — Lane Kiffin, Ole Miss Head Coach

“We’ve created a system where players leave not because of playing time but because someone else gave them a better deal. That’s not college athletics.”— Dabo Swinney, Clemson Head Coach

Booster Compensation & NIL 
Athletes can earn money through endorsements, but wealthy boosters use NIL as a loophole to pay athletes to attend certain schools. With few regulations, this has created a chaotic and unequal system.

“The NCAA said NIL wasn’t supposed to be pay-for-play. That’s exactly what it has become.” — Nick Saban, Former Alabama Head Coach

“It’s not NIL anymore, it’s just ‘pay to come play here.’ If we don’t regulate this, we’ll lose what makes college football special.” — Kirk Herbstreit, ESPN Analyst

College Athlete Employment & Title IX
There’s increasing pressure to classify athletes as employees and give them a share of revenue. However, this creates financial and legal challenges, especially regarding Title IX, which requires gender equity in college sports.

“If we go the employee route, we’ll have to cut sports. That’s not a threat. That’s math.” — Jack Swarbrick, Notre Dame Athletic Director

Olympic Sports, Conference Realignment & TV Deals
Football and TV money drive schools to change conferences and chase bigger media deals. This risks Olympic and non-revenue sports and disrupts long-standing rivalries and regional traditions.

“The Olympic sports will suffer if we only chase football money. We need to protect the full college athletics model.”
— Greg Sankey, SEC Commissioner

“These TV-driven realignments are tearing apart regional rivalries and traditions. What are we really building here?”— Pat McAfee, ESPN Analyst and former player

Helper Rather Than Fixer

In pure Washington, D.C. fashion, the Saban Commission is over before it started. Saban went on Finebaum, the SEC’s head-of-state, this week. During the interview, Saban put the committee pretty much on ice. First, he pleaded the 5th and told Finebaum that the details of the committee were still fuzzy, and he doubted that it really needed to exist.  “I don’t know much about the commission, first of all.” Saban said. Second of all, I don’t think we really need a commission.” Saban further said that even if there is a problem, he would much rather take on the helper role than be the fixer. “I don’t think I should be the tip of the spear…I would just like to help anyone who seeks to fix it.”

When Do We Kick?

College football is changing and evolving at a rapid pace. Far faster and more extreme than most fans may be comfortable with. The challenge is seeing what “can” or “should” be done about the issues. The issues are probably beyond a Presidential commission. Saban should have a voice, but from the sounds of it, he does not want to be the only or at least the most prominent one. We are not putting the genie back in the bottle. NIL/revenue sharing is here to stay. It may be called other things, but that money will not move or leave. Too many boosters and state representatives aren’t willing to see State U struggle or be forced to step back. The Transfer Portal is problematic,  but putting in restrictions will be tough. We are more likely to see contractual obligations help in the rapid and seemingly continuous movement we have seen.

With all of this, let’s remember. There is a reason we love this game. Maybe we grew up going to the games. Perhaps we met our sweethearts in the student section. Whatever it is, there is a bond that brings us back each fall. So no matter how bad it may seem or how the sky may be seemingly falling, it’s important to breathe. College football is now less than 100 days away. Don’t fall for the clicks. We don’t need the Saban Commission. We need to make sure we have our tickets and tailgate snacks ready.

Main Image: Gary Cosby Jr.

Former Ohio State and Pittsburgh Steelers linebacker Ryan Shazier is sounding the alarm about what college football might be losing in the process. During a candid conversation with fellow former Steeler Arthur Moats on his podcast, Shazier didn’t mince words about the sport’s evolving culture.

The former first-round NFL draft pick, who saw his playing career cut short by a devastating spinal injury in 2017, expressed both support for players getting paid and concern that the focus on financial gain is eroding what once made college football special. As NIL collectives drive over 80% of the booming market, Shazier’s perspective offers a rare glimpse into how veterans of the pre-NIL era view the transformation.

More Money, Less Meaning? Former Steelers Star Points to NIL’s Unintended Side Effects on Player Mindset

In the podcast discussion, Shazier acknowledged the obvious benefits of NIL that he missed as a college athlete. “I wish I had NIL,” he admitted candidly. “Hey, you might would have stayed a little longer, maybe,” suggested Moats.

Despite supporting financial opportunities for players, Shazier expressed concerns about how the current system affects athlete motivation. “It’s like guys are so focused on like their money now and not just the love of the game. It’s not as many guys in my opinion that love ball as much as we did.”

Shazier contrasted this with his own mindset during his playing days: “When I used to play, I used like bro, the money going to come, bro. If I do what I’m supposed to do, If you the best, if you top five in your position, you going to be paid top five.”

Beyond NIL itself, Shazier took issue with how the transfer portal has created a constant leverage game among players. “The one thing I don’t like though for real is, just the transfer aspect of it because guys can just constantly leverage what somebody else is giving them.”

While acknowledging that leveraging offers makes business sense, Shazier questioned its educational value: “So to me, like in business, it’s nice to leverage, but just to leverage every year just in business and life, it doesn’t really teach you much. It doesn’t really allow. You don’t build a relationship.”

While strongly supporting player compensation, Shazier pushed back against standardized payment models. “I do feel that everybody should get paid. I do feel like everybody should get the most they can get, right? But when you get player unions and things like that as well, that’s when everybody think everybody should get the same amount.”

KEEP READING: College Football’s 16-Team Playoff Plan Sparks Outrage—Why Experts Say It Could Break the Sport

As the college football landscape continues transforming with direct revenue sharing expected to begin in July 2025, Shazier’s concerns highlight an important balance that financial empowerment is long overdue but preserving the sport’s core values such as passion, relationship-building and love of the game, remains essential for college football’s future.

College Sports Network has you covered with the latest news, analysis, insights, and trending stories in football, men’s basketball, women’s basketball, and baseball!