Connect with us
https://yoursportsnation.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/call-to-1.png

NIL

College football's calendar needs an overhaul. Would a single transfer portal in January or …

ASHEVILLE, N.C. — Can you imagine a summer signing day in college football? What about a single transfer portal? How about spring practices shifted to June? Those are the questions expected to be answered by members of a new committee of power conference administrators exploring ways to overhaul a 365-day college football calendar that was […]

Published

on

College football's calendar needs an overhaul. Would a single transfer portal in January or ...

ASHEVILLE, N.C. — Can you imagine a summer signing day in college football? What about a single transfer portal? How about spring practices shifted to June?

Those are the questions expected to be answered by members of a new committee of power conference administrators exploring ways to overhaul a 365-day college football calendar that was originally built for an amateurism system. College executives are reinventing a dated calendar to marry with the House settlement-related athlete-revenue sharing model set to begin July 1.

Advertisement

And they are on the clock to do it.

“It is imperative to our industry that we make this decision on the calendar by July 1,” Washington athletic director Pat Chun told Yahoo Sports from Orlando last week at a gathering of athletic administrators. “Once July 1 hits, teams will start tracking for 2026. We need to know the calendar.”

Here in Asheville, North Carolina, this week, the 32 Division I conference commissioners gather for their annual summer meeting, where a host of items are on the agenda: the future of NCAA governance (will a separate division be created for the power leagues?); the College Football Playoff format (will adjustments to the selection criteria appease the Big Ten and SEC?); the NCAA tournament (is expansion happening or not?); and the many unsettled concepts tethered to the industry’s landmark move to share revenue directly with athletes.

Advertisement

Of all the decisions that administrators must make in the wake of the settlement’s approval, the football calendar is, perhaps, the most pressing of them. Making matters more difficult is that they don’t agree on the most critical piece: the timing of the transfer portal.

Should it be in January or April?

A fight is brewing

While the majority of coaches want a 10-day portal period in early January, many administrators, as well as coaches in the Big Ten, are supporting an April portal date as a way to more align the portal with the academic calendar (ending in May) and a school’s new revenue share cap year (ending in June).

Advertisement

The portal’s date not only impacts decisions on spring practice but it may determine if a second portal window will continue to exist. For instance, SEC coaches, hell bent on a January portal date, agreed last month that they’d prefer keeping two portal windows over a single window in April.

ATLANTA, GEORGIA - JANUARY 18: A detailed view of the 2025  College Football Playoff National Championship logo on display at 2025 CFP National Championship Playoff Fan Central at Georgia World Congress Center on January 18, 2025 in Atlanta, Georgia. (Photo by Paras Griffin/Getty Images)

College football’s leaders are torn on how to handle the transfer portal moving forward, but they’re on the clock after the House settlement decision. (Paras Griffin/Getty Images)

(Paras Griffin via Getty Images)

A brewing fight is playing out over the issue between college sports’ two perennial conferences — the SEC and Big Ten — as well as the industry’s administrative leadership versus many of its high-profile head coaches. SEC coaches want a January portal in an effort to secure next season’s team, develop that team during spring practice and avoid one-third of their players transferring after spring.

Big Ten coaches want a spring portal to more align with their academic calendar (the quarter system) and the revenue-share cap year.

Advertisement

“April (portal) doesn’t make any sense,” LSU coach Brian Kelly told Yahoo Sports two weeks ago from SEC meetings. “You are going to put a business together and 33% of your revenue share (paid players) could be gone in three months? That’s stupid. It just doesn’t make any sense. (Big Ten coaches) are trying to set it to their academic calendar and they’re saying they can’t get guys in in January. Come on. We are firm on January and if we have to do a second (portal), we would. But we are firm on January.”

A January portal reeks of one-track mind thinking, says Ohio State athletic director Ross Bjork.

“With January, we are only worried about one thing and that’s the football team,” he told Yahoo Sports from Orlando last week.”‘Oh! We got to have everybody there for a second semester because I have to get them in spring ball!’

“If we want to worry about the financial component and the academic component, the best window is spring,” he said. “They’re only worrying about one thing — the football roster — and I think that mindset is in the past.”

Advertisement

Bjork, along with Chun, are members of the House Implementation Committee, a group that studied the calendar at length over the last month and made a recommendation to power conference commissioners to form this new group of conference football administrators. The new group is expected to recommend a new calendar to commissioners in the coming weeks.

The salary cap issue

At the crux of the issue is the new, annual quasi-salary cap imposed on schools — a max of $20.5 million to be shared with athletes in Year 1. A school’s cap resets every July 1, signaling the beginning of a new cap year. In an ideal world, says Chun, athlete revenue-share agreements would begin in July and run through the following June — a reason a spring portal makes more sense.

But the portal isn’t the only thing changing.

Advertisement

The current signing day model — windows in December and then February — “doesn’t work” in a salary cap environment, says Chun, formerly a member of the NCAA transformation committee who has studied this issue more than most.

Institutions can’t wait on athletes to choose where to play that deep into the fall or winter. Cap calculations are being made for the next year’s revenue-share pool much earlier.

“The days of kids picking one of five hats in December or January are over,” he said. “If a kid surprises a school with an announcement … that school better have that cap space if that kid picks that hat. And what if he doesn’t? Do you then have dead cap space?”

The pool revenue that a school doesn’t spend does not carry over to the next cap year.

Advertisement

One thing is clear: Signing day will move up significantly.

In a 36-page document released by the NCAA and power conferences last week, a new “offer” date was established. Schools can formally offer revenue-share contracts to high school prospects Aug. 1 of their senior year. Chun expects that date, or perhaps another date in August or September, will become the new signing date.

Could it move to June or July? Maybe, says Bjork.

“Pretty much 95% of our prospects are visiting in the month of June,” Bjork says. “If they are ready to make a commitment, why not let them sign? Sign immediately. They can see their rev-share and see it all. We’ve moved up official visits so there’s no reason they couldn’t sign.”

Advertisement

The portal is much more of a fight.

“I want to develop my team in whatever date in January,” Georgia coach Kirby Smart said last month. “Then you work those guys out, you train those guys, you lift, you prepare, you do meetings. You do all this preparation and then that’s your team.”

Athens, GA - APRIL 13: Georgia Bulldogs Head Coach Kirby Smart watches the action during the G-Day Red and Black Spring Game on April 13, 2024, Sanford Stadium in Athens, GA. (Photo by Jeffrey Vest/Icon Sportswire via Getty Images)

Kirby Smart, along with the rest of the SEC coaches, want to see a January portal window in order to have the roster set for spring practice. (Photo by Jeffrey Vest/Icon Sportswire via Getty Images)

(Icon Sportswire via Getty Images)

A spring portal would mean players spending December-March on “your campus getting tampered with” and then “33%” of them leaving, Smart said. “I’m not for that.”

NC State coach Dave Doeren says “you don’t want to spend three months training guys who are leaving” while holding spring practice.

But what if spring practice were significantly altered? A proposal from the American Football Coaches Association would alter spring drills and provide flexibility for coaches to push some practices to May or June in OTA-style events.

Advertisement

According to the proposal, coaches can hold six additional padless practices in the summer, with the flexibility to move a portion of the 15 spring practices to summer.

“If you have an April signing day, your spring practice is going to look a lot different than if you have one in January,” said Arizona athletic director Desiree Reid-Francois, a member of the House Implementation Committee. “It’ll impact spring and what you do during the summer.”

An April portal would pave the way for college sports to design more of an NFL-like calendar, where free agency follows the competitive season and then summer workouts unfold to develop a new team.

“Everybody has to look at it like this: college football has changed,” Chun says. “We should not have transfer movement until we crown a national champion. The new calendar needs to prioritize academic progress and retention. To be eligible for the revenue share, those are the two academic criteria. All the studies show, the more you transfer, the more problematic it is for progress to degree.”

Advertisement

The new group working on the issue is expected to meet soon and include football administrators from the power leagues, as well conference compliance officers and athletic directors.

“There are no easy answers,” Florida athletic director Scott Stricklin sums up the issue.

Said Chun: “We have to give football a chance for sustainability again. We’ve all said the last environment is unsustainable. Here’s our opportunity for sustainability. We have to have an environment that awards the football players that choose to stay, that has sustainability.”

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

NIL

Vanderbilt football coach on revenue sharing vs NIL

Martel Hight will play both ways in 2025: Clark Lea Here’s what Clark Lea said about Martel Hight’s potential as a two-way player for Vanderbilt football in 2025. ATLANTA – Just a few years after NIL and instant eligibility for transfers upended the college football world, programs must adjust again. The recent House settlement implemented […]

Published

on


play

ATLANTA – Just a few years after NIL and instant eligibility for transfers upended the college football world, programs must adjust again.

The recent House settlement implemented revenue sharing, where schools pay players directly rather than them signing contracts with a collective. There’s a cap on how much revenue sharing money schools can give out, split across all sports. NIL deals can still exist, but they must go through a clearinghouse run by Deloitte called NIL Go.

On top of that, football teams can give out scholarships to anyone on their roster, but rosters will be capped at 105. Some players, called Designated Student Athletes, can be grandfathered in during the first few years of the roster limits if they were previously on the team.

Vanderbilt football coach Clark Lea was slow to adapt to the original NIL and transfer rules, but he believes he’s better prepared this time around. If anything, he said, the new rules make roster-building more straightforward.

“I don’t want to say it’s a seamless transition, because it’s a transition,” Lea said in a session with local media at SEC media days on July 14. “We’re going from contracts written through a collective to now having those as part of the revenue share salary cap. And so we have to transition to those contracts in a way that keeps up moving without skipping a beat.

” … There is no room for a team in our league that’s not fully participating. From there, it becomes, how do we engage the Nashville community to go beyond the revenue share? And I’m excited to explore all those things to better position us for where the game is headed.”

To engage the Nashville community, Lea said he saw opportunities for partnerships with local businesses that could sign Vanderbilt players to NIL deals above the revenue-sharing cap. Lea said he was not directly involved with those conversations, as he was better off focusing on football, but that other parts of the department were focused on taking advantage of those opportunities.

The Commodores have a higher profile going into 2025 than they’ve had in a while with returning quarterback Diego Pavia and tight end Eli Stowers, plus several other good players. Martel Hight could play offense, defense and special teams.

But there are still questions abounding. NIL Go has rejected several NIL deals, leaving teams uncertain about the level of enforcement that will take place.

Lea and Vanderbilt, like everyone else, will have to figure out those things as they go.

Aria Gerson covers Vanderbilt athletics for The Tennessean. Contact her at agerson@gannett.com or on X @aria_gerson.





Link

Continue Reading

NIL

Brian Kelly endorses the possibility of Nick Saban returning to college football

Nick Saban and his potential return to coaching college football has become a trending topic at SEC Media Days. LSU head coach Brian Kelly is hoping it comes to fruition. The fuse was lit by former Alabama quarterback Greg McElroy on McElroy and Cubelic in the Morning, when he relayed that he’s heard someone predict the legendary leader will return to […]

Published

on

Brian Kelly endorses the possibility of Nick Saban returning to college football

Nick Saban and his potential return to coaching college football has become a trending topic at SEC Media Days. LSU head coach Brian Kelly is hoping it comes to fruition.

The fuse was lit by former Alabama quarterback Greg McElroy on McElroy and Cubelic in the Morning, when he relayed that he’s heard someone predict the legendary leader will return to coaching at some point. He cited a “very much in the know person” thinks Saban will get back to the sidelines.

McElroy continued to hammer home the idea with SEC Network analyst Paul Finebaum. Saban currently works as an analyst for ESPN, but he’s not part of SEC Network’s coverage of SEC Media Days in Atlanta and is not in attendance this week.

As the story makes its rounds in Georgia, Kelly was asked about a potential return to the sport for Saban. It’s something the Tigers leader would sign up for, believing college football as a whole is better when Saban is on the sidelines.

“It’d be better for college football if Nick Saban is coaching. Period,” Kelly told On3’s Alex Byington. “There’s nobody better to develop players and certainly build championship programs, but at the same time understanding how to do it and how to do it the right way. It’d be a great day if he was back in it.”

While it may seem a bit far fetched, McElroy is beating the drum, and Kelly is hoping for the best. The former Crimson Tide signal-caller did point out it was someone “notable” who told him they think Saban isn’t necessarily done coaching. In fact, he said the person was “adamant.”

“This is a little bit out of left field, but the question was asked of me … a very much in the know person that I have a lot of respect for and have spent a lot of time around and just really, really admire,” McElroy said. “They seem to think Nick Saban’s not done coaching. I had a similar reaction. He’s pretty adamant that he thinks Nick Saban will be coaching again. … Look, if it wasn’t someone notable, I’d never say a word.”

Before the hype train leaves the station, Finebaum did rain on the parade a bit, responding with a resounding, “No” when McElroy asked if he “bought” the speculation. The former Alabama quarterback agreed with him, and Finebaum pointed out the life the legendary coach is living – including his improving golf game.

Stranger things have happened though. Brian Kelly wouldn’t mind the competition if Nick Saban decided to return. A rising tide lifts all boats. It’s certainly something to keep an eye on moving forward.

— On3’s Nick Schultz contributed to this article.

Continue Reading

NIL

New House proposal could reign in NIL chaos in college athletics

A new bill introduced in the House of Representatives calls for regulation in college athletics as leaders search for answers in the new era of Name, Image and Likeness. The SCORE Act, introduced to the House last week, aims to provide the NCAA with antitrust protections, pre-emption of state laws that regulate NIL payments and […]

Published

on


A new bill introduced in the House of Representatives calls for regulation in college athletics as leaders search for answers in the new era of Name, Image and Likeness.

The SCORE Act, introduced to the House last week, aims to provide the NCAA with antitrust protections, pre-emption of state laws that regulate NIL payments and a ban on making student athletes employees of their schools, according to a report from the Associated Press.

The bill comes on the heels of the House settlement, instituted on July 1. Schools can now share up to $20.5 million directly to players this year in a revenue share model. Additionally, the NCAA is set to pay $2.8 billion to current and former athletes for use of their NIL.

Seven republicans and two democrats are listed as co-sponsors of the SCORE Act, which primarily intends to impose national standards on NIL payments that continue to rise in the aftermath of the settlement.

If passed, the bill will also ban schools from using “athletic fees” imposed on students to fund athletic departments. Schools like Clemson, Tennessee and Arkansas have already implemented similar costs this year.

As football and basketball are set to receive the majority of the $20.5 million revenue-share cap, non-revenue sports would be protected by the SCORE Act, in part, by a requirement on schools to maintain at least 16 sports if one coach makes more than $250,000 a year.

According to the report, the bill has a “fair chance” at passing in the House but a “slim” chance of pasisng in the Senate, where the SCORE Act would need at least seven Democratic votes.



Link

Continue Reading

NIL

Texas Tech hoping big money and top transfers lead to unprecedented payback in football | Football

FRISCO, Texas (AP) — Texas Tech coach Joey McGuire had already completed his portion of Big 12 football media days when Colorado’s Deion Sanders was asked if he has been paying attention to what the Red Raiders did in the transfer portal. The gist of that question was really about all the money for Texas […]

Published

on


FRISCO, Texas (AP) — Texas Tech coach Joey McGuire had already completed his portion of Big 12 football media days when Colorado’s Deion Sanders was asked if he has been paying attention to what the Red Raiders did in the transfer portal.

The gist of that question was really about all the money for Texas Tech athletes, which is widely reported to be around $55 million for the upcoming school year. A significant chunk of that is expected to go toward the transformation of a football program that has never won a Big 12 title or even had a 10-win season since 2008, six years before three-time Super Bowl champion quarterback Patrick Mahomes played his first game for the Red Raiders.

“Yeah, Joey got some money. Joey, where you at, baby? Spending that money, I love it,” Sanders said emphatically about the fellow Big 12 coach he calls a friend, and who coached two of his three sons in high school. “I love you, man. I appreciate you. Can you send a few of those dollars to us so we can get some of those players too?”

The reported dollar figures are staggering, even in these early days of schools being able to pay athletes directly. That total supposedly includes the maximum $20.5 million of revenue each school can share with players under the NCAA’s landmark House settlement that took effect this month, meaning the rest would come through name, image and likeness deals.

Red Raiders spending big

Last fall, Texas Tech said it was budgeting $14.7 million for the fiscal year — about $9 million more than the previous year — in support for the athletic program, which had a budget of nearly $129 million. The headlines started to come soon after.

Tech’s softball team had never won a Big 12 regular-season or tournament championship before standout pitcher NiJaree Canady arrived last year in Lubbock with a NIL deal that made her the first $1 million softball player.

With Canady, who had been to the previous two Women’s College World Series with Stanford, the Red Raiders won both of those league titles and got all the way to the final game of this year’s WCWS before losing to rival Texas.

Canady has already signed a similar NIL deal for next season. Tech also added three top transfers: Florida second baseman Mia Williams; two-time 20-game winner Kaitlyn Terry from UCLA; and Missouri Valley Conference player of the year Jackie Lis, an infielder from Southern Illinois.

Along with all the money spent on players, Texas Tech this spring unveiled a $240 million football complex at Jones AT&T Stadium, where Cody Campbell Field is named after the former offensive lineman who made a $25 million donation to the project.

Campbell’s financial impact on the program goes well beyond that. He is chairman of the school’s Board of Regents, a billionaire who with his oil and gas partner John Sellers co-founded The Matador Club, the school’s NIL collective that is now under the umbrella of the athletic department’s Red Raider Club. Sellers and Campbell earlier this year sold some subsidies of an oil and natural gas company for about $4 billion.

Last week, Campbell announced the launch of a nonprofit called Saving College Sports to help solve a “crisis” as the industry “faces an existential turning point as legal, governance and economic challenges threaten” hundreds of thousands of athletes, fandom and the economies of campus communities.

On the gridiron

The Texas Tech men’s basketball program has four Sweet 16 appearances since 2018, including a run to the national title game in 2019. But the big moneymaker for all programs is football and the Red Raiders will find out this fall if a big financial commitment to those players will get them into the 12-team College Football Playoff.

Texas Tech brought in 22 football transfers in what many consider a top national portal class. Most are highly touted players, with about half expected to be starters and most of the others impact players on a team already with several key returners after going 8-5 last year in McGuire’s third season.

“Yeah, it’s been a fun offseason,” McGuire said before Sanders took the podium. “We were really aggressive whenever it came to the portal and meeting some of our needs for the football team. … I think this conference is really strong. There’s a lot of teams that have some big opportunities this year to really make a statement, and we’re planning on being one of them.”

With the amount of money involved, some front-loaded NIL deals before the House settlement with new guidelines went into effect, it will certainly be a huge and expensive disappointment if they are not.

“I understand how important this year is,” McGuire said. “We’ve got to have a lot of things go right, but everybody does. You’ve got to keep your quarterback healthy. You’ve got to play at a high level. I know there’s a lot of expectations. My job that I’m going to really try to do is keep the pressure on me and the coaches.”

Tech returns senior quarterback Behren Morton, who threw for 2,976 yards and 25 touchdowns last season, and senior linebacker Jacob Rodriguez, the league’s top tackler with 126 last year. Rodriguez is the preseason Big 12 defensive player of the year, and on the league’s preseason team with a pair of four-star transfers: edge rusher David Bailey (Stanford) and defensive lineman Lee Hunter (UCF).

“It’s unbelievable, those guys came in and bought in to what we were talking about,” Rodriguez said. “I love those guys to death already and I think they’re going to make my job a lot easier, especially with the guys we have up front.”

It will also be up to McGuire to deal with paid players, some making significantly more than others on the roster.

“I think that goes into your culture,” the former Texas high school coach said. “It’s real. It’s real money. Guys are making different amounts of money in the locker room.

“One thing that you better understand if you dream to play in the NFL, your contract’s not going to be the same as the guy next to you, and if that’s what you focus on, then you’re going to spend a lot of time wasting a lot of energy,” McGuire said. “If guys want to increase that, focus on what you can control. That’s your game and how hard you’re practicing and how hard you’re playing.”


AP Sports Writer Schuyler Dixon contributed.


AP college football: https://apnews.com/hub/college-football



Link

Continue Reading

NIL

Incoming Virginia Tech men’s basketball star uses filthy move that should fire up fans

It has been some time since the Virginia Tech men’s basketball program has had some hype surrounding an incoming freshman. In fact, this season, there is a real chance that when all is said and done next June, veteran coach Mike Young could be looking at having a pair of draft picks in the 2026 […]

Published

on


It has been some time since the Virginia Tech men’s basketball program has had some hype surrounding an incoming freshman. In fact, this season, there is a real chance that when all is said and done next June, veteran coach Mike Young could be looking at having a pair of draft picks in the 2026 NBA Draft on his 2025-26 roster.

Those two players would be Tobi Lawal and incoming freshman Neoklis Avdalas, both of whom entered the NBA Draft process this spring, but withdrew to play another year of college basketball. Lawal, who transferred to Virginia Tech from VCU last season, will play his second season for Young, while Avdalas gave a verbal commitment to the Hokies and then signed after withdrawing. He is not on campus yet as he is playing in the FIBA Eurobasket U20 with Greece, and he had a move that should fire up Tech fans for next season.

Virginia Tech incoming freshman Neoklis Avdalas drops a filthy move in a FIBA matchup

If there is one thing that is clear about Avdalas, it’s that he has the opportunity to be a special player at Virginia Tech. Expect him to be able to play multiple positions for the Hokies, and that even includes handling the ball as the point guard. He had a play against Lithuania that Hokies fans hope to see next winter in Blacksburg: a filthy crossover.

That was certainly a filthy move by Avdalas and Virginia Tech fans are hoping that they see that a few times next winter. One thing is clear, Avdalas has multiple ways he can score the ball and that is something Hokies fans have seen a lot of. The Hokies are going to have multiple options on offense next season, but Avdalas might very well end up being their best option. It almost seems too good to be true.





Link

Continue Reading

NIL

SEC coaches on revenue-sharing, NIL (update No. 1)

ATLANTA, Georgia – Hovering over every coach at SEC Media Days are questions about revenue-sharing and NIL. It is the front and center in every discussion about football,. We will share here over the next four days what coaches have to say about the new world in which they find themselves. SOUTH CAROLINA’S SHANE BEAMER […]

Published

on


ATLANTA, Georgia – Hovering over every coach at SEC Media Days are questions about revenue-sharing and NIL. It is the front and center in every discussion about football,.

We will share here over the next four days what coaches have to say about the new world in which they find themselves.

SOUTH CAROLINA’S SHANE BEAMER

On what he wants to see

“That what we say is going to be enforced, is going to happen and be enforced. Because all the talk out there about what’s new stuff and this and that, if there is no teeth to it, doesn’t matter. It’s just going to continue to be. “

On hope for the future

“What has been implemented with rev share and the clearinghouse and all that, I see other conferences talking about the negatives about it already. Let’s give this thing time to work and develop. Let’s see what it is and not all of a sudden say it’s not going to work.

“I was in DC earlier this year talking about the need to it for national legislation, so been talking a lot about this. But something uniform that has some teeth to it where it is what it’s supposed to be, and if somebody is not doing what they’re supposed to be doing, it’s going to be enforced and there will be repercussions.”

LSU’S BRIAN KELLY

On the process

“We are early on in the process,” Kelly said. “This is the first step in what we are trying to build. I am excited about college football. I am excited we have something in place in terms of revenue-sharing. NIL is still something we have to navigate. I think we still have to be thinking about how we continue to build or support for NIL. It’s not going away. Nor should it.”

On what is important going forward

“Transparency and consistency. Those two words are probably the most important things as we continue to move forward. … If we start with transparency and start with the clear communication necessary and consistency and approach. It’s got to start with coaches.

:It’s got to start with us. I mean, we have to be the stewards of this. There has to be a moral high ground. Ethics in this. It starts with us. It starts with coaches. I was at a speaking engagement a few weeks back, and every question about NIL was trying to find a way around it, trying to find a way to bring in revenue in some other way.

“Sooner or later we have to take the stand that transparency, consistency, ethics, and morality are at the core of this. If that’s where we are we’re going to be able to move to the next step and be able to continue to make progress.”

This story will be updated throughout the day.

LSU’S BRIAN KELLY

On the process

“We are early on in the process,” Kelly said. “This is the first step in what we are trying to build. I am excited about college football. I am excited we have something in place in terms of revenue-sharing. NIL is still something we have to navigate. I think we still have to be thinking about how we continue to build or support for NIL. It’s not going away. Nor should it.”

On what is important going forward

“Transparency and consistency. Those two words are probably the most important things as we continue to move forward. … If we start with transparency and start with the clear communication necessary and consistency and approach. It’s got to start with coaches.

:It’s got to start with us. I mean, we have to be the stewards of this. There has to be a moral high ground. Ethics in this. It starts with us. It starts with coaches. I was at a speaking engagement a few weeks back, and every question about NIL was trying to find a way around it, trying to find a way to bring in revenue in some other way.

“Sooner or later we have to take the stand that transparency, consistency, ethics, and morality are at the core of this. If that’s where we are we’re going to be able to move to the next step and be able to continue to make progress.”

This story will be updated throughout the day.



Link

Continue Reading

Most Viewed Posts

Trending