NACOGDOCHES, Texas — On Jan. 17, Stephen F. Austin State University announced its upcoming beach volleyball schedule — just months after the team wrapped up the most successful season in school history.

But 125 days later, those same athletes were told they’d never play for SFA again.

Players like Sophia Myers had just returned home for summer break when they received a surprising message.

“I got up and. There was a message at 8:15 in the morning from our compliance saying, hey, mandatory Zoom call at one. And so everybody in our group chat is texting like, ‘what do you guys think this is? Just kind of waiting from eight in the morning till 1 p.m. was just kind of — it was torture, honestly.”

During that Zoom call, the team was blindsided: SFA was cutting the beach volleyball program.

Hours later, the university released a public statement: men’s and women’s golf, women’s beach volleyball, and even the two-time national champion women’s bowling team were all being eliminated.

“We even had girls who had committed two days before to our school, to our team, and they’re sitting in on the Zoom call. And it was just kind of like, ‘hey guys, thanks for joining.’ And then they just dumped probably the worst news we could have heard about our program on us,” Myers said. “It was just me, my teammates, and our head coach and our assistant coach, and she asked us, ‘does anybody have anything to say,’ and everybody was just in tears crying. 

Myers recalled being mad and frustrated. She asked how is this allowed under Title IX?

Title IX is a federal law that prohibits sex-based discrimination in any education or athletic program receiving federal funds.

This is where Arthur Bryant, a longtime civil rights attorney, came in. Myers and five other athletes turned to him to fight for their teams. 

On June 30, the athletes filed a federal lawsuit claiming sex-based discrimination and seeking to stop SFA from eliminating the women’s beach volleyball, bowling and golf teams.

“Well, we have two goals with this lawsuit. The first is to immediately stop the elimination of these teams, but the larger and even bigger, more important goal is to get SFA to comply with the law and treat women and men equally when it comes to participation opportunities going forward, ” Bryant said. 

Bryant’s team says they have uncovered more than a decade of Title IX noncompliance at SFA.

Under Title IX, athletic opportunities must reflect student body demographics. SFA’s undergraduate population is 63% female.

Before the cuts, women made up just 47% of the athletic program. After the cuts, the women’s sports make up 42%.

“That’s way off. It’s mass sex discrimination. To actually get in compliance with Title IX, SFA would have to add over 200 opportunities for women to play sports,” Bryant said. 

Instead, Bryant’s team says SFA has cut every women’s sport added since 2003. The only men’s sport added in that time —baseball — is still active.

The university cited budget issues and looming revenue-sharing rules in Division I sports as reasons for the cuts.

“You can’t discriminate against women to make money,” Bryant said. “You can’t discriminate against women to avoid losing money. You can’t avoid discriminating against women because some people would rather support men’s sports or watch men’s sports than women’s sports. Doesn’t matter.”

The university promised to honor athletic scholarships for affected athletes, but Myers wasn’t on scholarship. As a walk-on, she now relies solely on academic aid.

“You’re going to walk on, and we’ll be able to give you money later, is what the coach told me,” Myers said.

The school is also allowing these athletes to transfer, but changing colors just isn’t as easy as walking through the portal, especially for athletes like bowling, whose transfer portal had already closed.

“We had only a couple of days to get ourselves in the portal and start communicating with coaches, essentially. And I only had one school in mind, and unfortunately, that school had already filled all their spots because the portal had already been open for some time,” Myers said. “So it made things extremely difficult, and also, not to mention, if I wanted to transfer, there would be a good bit of my credits of school that wouldn’t transfer over.”

Bryant noted that normally schools would notify athletes of much sooner than SFA, such as the beginning of the school year rather than the end. 

“SFA announced at the very end of the year when people had already put down money for housing for next year, when they’ve put things in storage, when they’ve left and gone out of the state, when clients have gone, miles and miles and miles away,” Bryant said. “It couldn’t have been worse just how it affected these young women and the men and the team that was eliminated. Just the way it was handled was truly disturbing.”

Despite all this, every woman involved in the lawsuit has decided to stay at SFA. Their legal team has filed for a preliminary injunction, hoping the court will reverse the cuts immediately so the teams can have and prepare for a season.

“Beach volleyball isn’t something that you can just hop into,” Myers said. “It’s a very physical sport, and it takes a lot of endurance, and you can’t just stop playing and then show up in August and say, ‘hey, I’m on the team.’”

And compete in the sport these women love.

“It is really hard to accept and swallow. Honestly, I just — I have no words when I talk about it, because it does affect me, and I know volleyball isn’t forever, and that’s why I chose a school like SFA, so that I could do academics along with it. But it’s like, these are my last four years to finish my sport and, like, be done and come to terms with that. But not knowing it was my last season, and not knowing that was my last time with my teammates is just really — it’s just so sad,” she said. 

When asked for comment on the lawsuit, SFA released the following statement, “The university takes its Title IX obligations seriously and is prepared to respond through the legal process. As this is an ongoing legal matter, the university will not comment further at this time.”

Bryant said he strongly believes they’re going to win this case. 

“We believe strongly that we’re going to get the preliminary injunction, because what SFA is doing is a blatant violation of Title IX,” he said.

The court will hear the athletes’ request for their motion for a preliminary injunction in attempt to keep the women’s sports programs on July 30 to 31 at the federal courthouse in Lufkin.