NIL
ESPN’s Pat McAfee Amazed by NiJaree Canady’s WCWS Performance
NiJaree Canady’s impressive performance in the WCWS has caught the attention of one of the biggest names in the sports entertainment industry, Pat McAfee. McAfee, who is an ESPN personality, raved about the Texas Tech pitcher during Tuesday’s episode of The Pat McAfee Show. The junior has pitched lights out all season and stepped it […]

NiJaree Canady’s impressive performance in the WCWS has caught the attention of one of the biggest names in the sports entertainment industry, Pat McAfee.
McAfee, who is an ESPN personality, raved about the Texas Tech pitcher during Tuesday’s episode of The Pat McAfee Show.
The junior has pitched lights out all season and stepped it up even more in the WCWS. Canady has thrown 300 pitches throughout her three games in Oklahoma City. She is 32-5 overall and has a nation-leading 0.86 ERA.
Canady made history when she signed to play for Texas Tech, becoming the first-ever college softball player to ink a one-million-dollar NIL deal. Now that Golden Arm has led the Red Raiders to the WCWS finals for the first time in program history.
On The Pat McAfee Show, McAfee expressed his excitement for Canady and the sport of softball.
“People are making a million bucks and its electrifying,” McAfee said.
McAfee wasn’t the only one impressed by Canady’s performance.
“She is an absolute dog,” Ty Schmit. “She has thrown every single pitch in the College World Series for Texas Tech so far, and behold, they’re in the championship series.”
“If women’s college softball is making a million dollars, I think that’s good for sports, and she’s lived up to it,” McAfee added.
More News: Iowa High Schooler Stuns Super Bowl Champ with Strikeout at Charity Softball Game
More News: Texas Softball Shuts Out Tennessee to Clinch Spot in WCWS Finals
More News: NiJaree Canady Shines, Texas Tech Softball Steals WCWS Win Against UCLA
NIL
Navigating NIL
The Bottom Line The House settlement promises a new era of compensation for student-athletes – if it survives ongoing challenges. The new structure offers opportunities for marketers to combine school sponsorships with student-athlete NIL deals in seamless transactions. The College Sports Commission is expected to target disguised boosterism in reviewing the fair market value of […]


The Bottom Line
- The House settlement promises a new era of
compensation for student-athletes – if it survives
ongoing challenges. - The new structure offers opportunities for marketers to combine
school sponsorships with student-athlete NIL deals in seamless
transactions. - The College Sports Commission is expected to target disguised
boosterism in reviewing the fair market value of NIL deals, so most
marketing deals should not be impacted. - However, the addition of a new layer of centralized review of
NIL deals will require more advanced planning and preparation for
potential delays when planning campaigns.
After five years of twists and turns, the settlement of the
House v. NCAA, Hubbard v. NCAA, and Carter v.
NCAA consolidated class action suits has finally been
approved, effectively ending the amateurism model that has
underpinned the NCAA since its founding in the early 1900s. While
the settlement promises significant changes to the college sports
landscape — most notably a $2.8 billion payout to current and
former student-athletes and the introduction of a revenue-sharing
model — key challenges remain, particularly regarding name,
image, and likeness (NIL) rules.
Understanding the New Structure
At its core, the settlement marks a historic break from the
NCAA’s traditional amateurism principles by permitting
student-athletes to receive direct payments from schools. Schools
will be allowed (but not required) to allocate up to 22% of the
average annual revenues — derived from media rights,
sponsorships and ticket sales — to student-athletes. The
initial cap is set at roughly $20.5 million per school, with
gradual increases anticipated over time, similar to the salary caps
common in professional sports.
The structure also imposes a shift in roster management,
replacing scholarship limits with roster caps. Many institutions
are expected to prioritize their highest-revenue sports, such as
football and men’s basketball. As a result, smaller programs
could face cuts and heightened competition for limited funding, and
the livelihood of smaller Olympic and non-revenue sports are
especially at risk. Already, several schools have cut programs and
preemptively cut rosters in multiple non-revenue sports. In a
last-minute response to objections to the settlement, the NCAA will
allow (but importantly will not require) schools to voluntarily
grandfather in current student-athletes and protect them from
roster limit cuts.
In addition to direct revenue sharing, the settlement permits
athletic departments to absorb NIL collectives and operate them as
internal marketing agencies. Schools will not only distribute funds
within the cap but also facilitate third-party NIL deals outside of
it. The “Power 5” conferences have formed a new entity,
the College Sports Commission (CSC), to oversee compliance and
enforcement by both schools and student-athletes.
Legal and Regulatory Hurdles
Although the settlement attempts to create a sense of certainty
in college sports, that certainty remains elusive. Almost
immediately after approval of the settlement was announced,
objectors to the settlement filed appeals on Title IX grounds. As a
result of these appeals, the $2.8 billion in payments are currently
on hold.
At the same time, Congress has engaged in its annual tradition
of introducing federal legislation to address NIL and college
sports regulation – this time, the Student Compensation and
Opportunity through Rights and Endorsements (SCORE) Act. Like the
dozens of Congressional bills before it, prospects for the SCORE
Act are not good. Meanwhile, several states, including California,
Michigan, and Ohio, enacted NIL laws that conflict with the
settlement’s terms, particularly around restrictions that could
limit student-athletes’ earnings. To date, at least 17 states
have laws at odds with the settlement framework, setting the stage
for further legal challenges.
The Role of the College Sports Commission
The CSC will act as the compliance arm of the new college sports
structure. For the schools that opt in to this system (notably, the
Ivy League will not participate), CSC will review roster caps to
ensure school compliance and NIL contracts to ensure they reflect
fair market value and are not used to circumvent the distribution
cap. Student-athletes will be required to report NIL deals valued
at $600 or more to NIL Go, the centralized platform developed by
Deloitte for the CSC. Noncompliant agreements may be rejected and
will be subject to penalties.
At this point, it is unclear how the CSC will manage the review
of NIL deals for the thousands of student-athletes across the
country or how long this review will take. Moreover, uncertainties
remain regarding how violations will be penalized and how
“fair market value” will be determined, particularly
given disparities between athletes at powerhouse programs and those
at smaller schools. The intent of this review is to root out
pay-for-play deals disguised as NIL deals. However, the arguments
by objectors to the House settlement hearings suggest that
the NCAA’s ability to assess the fair market value of the
social following of a student-athlete, particularly in non-revenue
sports, is suspect.
Preparing for What Lies Ahead
As the NCAA transitions into a revenue-sharing era with enhanced
scrutiny over NIL agreements, brands, universities, and
student-athletes must remain vigilant. Adapting quickly to these
regulatory shifts, staying ahead of ongoing conflicts between the
NCAA, athletes, and state regulators, and planning for changes in
campaign timelines will be critical to success in this new
collegiate sports economy.
The content of this article is intended to provide a general
guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought
about your specific circumstances.
NIL
ESPN analyst drops painfully hard truth on how Virginia Tech football gets over the hump in 2025
Going into the 2024 season, expectations were high for the Virginia Tech football team, but it ended up being another 6-6 regular season with a win needed over Virginia Thanksgiving Weekend just to become bowl-eligible. Since that Saturday night in late November in Lane Stadium, there have been some massive changes. The transfer portal saw […]

Going into the 2024 season, expectations were high for the Virginia Tech football team, but it ended up being another 6-6 regular season with a win needed over Virginia Thanksgiving Weekend just to become bowl-eligible. Since that Saturday night in late November in Lane Stadium, there have been some massive changes.
The transfer portal saw nearly 30 players hit it for a new home for the 2025 season, while head coach Brent Pry added some pieces through the portal himself. Pry fired three coaches, and a fourth, offensive coordinator Tyler Bowen, left for the offensive line coaching position at Ohio State. Two new coordinators and a new offensive line coach highlight the changes, leaving the Hokies with more questions than answers.
You get the feeling that 2025 is a big one for Pry after last season and his 16-22 through his first three seasons at Virginia Tech. Maybe, just maybe, the Hokies will surprise this fall, and if they do, one college football analyst reveals how they can.
Greg McElroy explains how Virginia Tech can get over the hump in 2025
Greg McElroy on his Allways College Football with Greg McElroy podcast said there are two ways the Hokies can be a player in the ACC this season. One, Kyron Drones returns to the Kyron Drones from 2023, and that is something that Hokies fans hope does happen. The second? Well, that’s easier said than done.
The second is that Virginia Tech finds a way to win one-score games, something they are 1-11 under Pry, according to McElroy. He compared it to the Scott Frost days at Nebraska, where the Cornhuskers were 5-22 in one-score games under the former quarterback. We know how that tenure ended.
“I am super optimistic about Virginia Tech and will always be optimistic about Virginia Tech,” McElroy said. “But quarterback play and winning close games gets them over the hump.”
Look, Pry’s struggles in one-score games are what it is and have been talked about enough, but hopefully with a new offensive coordinator, Philip Montgomery on staff and a former head coach, he can help with that and also help with getting Drones back to his 2023 form as long as he’s healthy. If that happens, then this could be an under-the-radar team in the ACC.
NIL
Big 12 Must Make Key Change to Keep Up With Rest of College Football
The college football landscape is evolving, and the Big 12 can’t waste time if it wants to keep up. Over the past few years, college football has begun to look more like the NFL. With players essentially having a free agency period with the transfer portal, and NIL delivering massive deals to players, the past […]

The college football landscape is evolving, and the Big 12 can’t waste time if it wants to keep up.
Over the past few years, college football has begun to look more like the NFL. With players essentially having a free agency period with the transfer portal, and NIL delivering massive deals to players, the past couple of years have already seen significant changes.
Now, with revenue sharing coming into college sports, the similarities to professional sports are only growing. While those changes have impacted everyone in college sports, there is still one key part of college football that has only been adopted by the top leagues.
Over the past couple of seasons, player availability reports have become more prevalent in college football. With the Big Ten and SEC already requiring these injury reports, the College Football Playoff is the next to follow suit, as reported by CBS Sports’ Brandon Marcello.
These reports have been key in giving teams an idea of what their opponent might look like on the field in a given week and has given fans more transparency on injuries. While college football injuries had been covered up and effectively left up to coaches to report on in press conferences for years, these reports have been a significant move in the right direction.
Of course, that move in the right direction has only been relevant for the two conferences that have implemented that change. For example, any Oklahoma State injury information about a player who could be held out of a game will still likely be covered up throughout the week before fans find out during the game or mere minutes before kickoff.
With the increase in gambling popularity obviously being another factor in these reports being required, it’s apparent which conferences are ready for this era of college sports and which conferences will be left behind due to complacency. Brett Yormark has tried to make his conference one of the best in the country and talked about being at the forefront of change, but the Big 12’s lack of action on this issue shows that the conference might never be capable of being on the same level as the SEC or Big Ten.
NIL
Who is Texas Tech softball facing in Women’s College World Series? Bracket, times set
The field for the 2025 Women’s College World Series is set and the Texas Tech softball team knows its path toward the national championship. Texas Tech was the first team to punch its ticket to Oklahoma City, sweeping Florida State in the Super Regionals with the series concluding Friday afternoon. The Red Raiders had to […]

The field for the 2025 Women’s College World Series is set and the Texas Tech softball team knows its path toward the national championship.
Texas Tech was the first team to punch its ticket to Oklahoma City, sweeping Florida State in the Super Regionals with the series concluding Friday afternoon. The Red Raiders had to wait for the final possible game of the weekend to find out their opponent.
Advertisement
More: Turns out NiJaree Canady’s NIL deal with Texas Tech softball is a bargain | Giese
More: NiJaree Canady finishes Super Regional sweep to send Texas Tech softball to Women’s College World Series
Ole Miss will be first up for Texas Tech with the game set for 6 p.m. Thursday in a game that will air on ESPN2. The Rebels pulled off another upset by taking out 4th-seeded Arkansas 7-4 in the third game of their Super Regional series.
Like Texas Tech, Ole Miss will be making its first appearance in the WCWS in program history. Those two are joined by Big Ten teams Oregon and UCLA on their side of the bracket. The Ducks and Bruins will square off in the final game of opening day.
Advertisement
Other teams to make the WCWS field include Oklahoma, Texas, Florida and Tennessee.
This article originally appeared on Lubbock Avalanche-Journal: Texas Tech softball to face Ole Miss in Women’s College World Series first
NIL
Coastal Carolina coach says CWS ejection was unwarranted and he was wrongly accused of bumping ump – 960 The Ref
OMAHA, Neb. — (AP) — Coastal Carolina coach Kevin Schnall, tossed from the game along with first base coach Matt Schilling in the first inning of the College World Series finals Sunday, said his ejection wasn’t justified and he was wrongly accused of bumping an umpire. Walker Mitchell was at bat with two outs and […]

OMAHA, Neb. — (AP) — Coastal Carolina coach Kevin Schnall, tossed from the game along with first base coach Matt Schilling in the first inning of the College World Series finals Sunday, said his ejection wasn’t justified and he was wrongly accused of bumping an umpire.
Walker Mitchell was at bat with two outs and Sebastian Alexander had just stolen second base when Schnall went to the top steps of the dugout, gestured at plate umpire Angel Campos with three fingers and began shouting at him.
The NCAA said Schnall was arguing balls and strikes, was given a warning and thrown out when he did not leave immediately. Instead, Schnall went onto the field to continue arguing.
The Tigers won 5-3 for their second national championship in three years.
When Schnall was arguing with Campos, one of the base umpires ran toward the confrontation and fell on his back.
“If you guys watch the video, there was a guy who came in extremely aggressively, tripped over Campos’ foot, embarrassed in front of 25,000, and goes ‘two-game suspension’ and says ‘bumping the umpire,’ Schnall said. ”There was no bump. I shouldn’t be held accountable for a grown man’s athleticism. Now it’s excessive because I was trying to say I didn’t bump him.
“It is what it is. If that warranted an ejection, there would be a lot of ejections. As umpires, it’s your job to manage the game with some poise and calmness and a little bit of tolerance.”
A spokesman said the NCAA stands by its original statement on the incident when asked for comment on Schnall’s remarks about bumping an umpire.
The NCAA in its initial statement on the incident said Schnall and Schilling engaged in “prolonged arguing,” which is to result in a two-game suspension. Schnall would miss the first two games of the 2026 season.
Schilling was thrown out for the comments he made while arguing, the NCAA said. If an assistant is ejected, he automatically also is suspended for one game. Schilling also got an additional two-game suspension under the “prolonged arguing” rule, the NCAA said. That means he will miss the first three games next year.
Associate head coach Chad Oxendine took over Schnall’s duties.
Schnall said he couldn’t hear Campos’ initial warning when he was arguing balls and strikes from the dugout.
“As a head coach, it’s your right to get an explanation for why we got warned,” Schnall said. “I’m 48 years old and I shouldn’t get shooed by another grown man. When I came out, I got told it was a warning issued for arguing balls and strikes, and I said it was because you missed three. At that point, ejected. If that warrants an ejection, I’m the first one to stand here like a man and apologize.”
That wasn’t going to happen.
“I’m not sorry for what happened,” he said. “I’m sorry for this being over. I’m sorry for how it ended.”
___
AP college sports: https://apnews.com/hub/college-sports
Copyright 2025 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without permission.
NIL
Ranking the top eight Big Ten football NIL valuations for 2025
Being able to compensate college athletes over the last few years has changed the landscape of college sports, most notably the revenue behemoth that is college football. Name, Image and Likeness has helped usher in a new era of bidding wars and recruiting efforts that didn’t exist just less than a decade ago. And now, […]

Being able to compensate college athletes over the last few years has changed the landscape of college sports, most notably the revenue behemoth that is college football. Name, Image and Likeness has helped usher in a new era of bidding wars and recruiting efforts that didn’t exist just less than a decade ago. And now, with the House Settlement, things will change even more.
Especially at a place like Ohio State that has a huge athletic department and a massive budget.
But NIL is still in practice, and there are still athletes getting paid for the usage of their name, so it’s a big deal. We always hear about the astronomical figures the top-end stars are pulling in, but there are smaller ones as well. However, the multi-million dollar contracts aren’t as prevalent as one would think. In fact, we’re ranking the top Big Ten NIL valuations, and there are fewer than ten that make the list worth mentioning.
Here’s a list of the top eight NIL valuations according to On3 in the Big Ten, ranked from least to most expensive. You may be surprised by what and who is on this list., and of course, the bigger programs with the most money like Ohio State appear on this list more than some that do not at all.
No. 8 – Evan Stewart, Wide Receiver | Oregon Ducks
NIL Valuation – $1.7 Million
National Rank – No. 25
Stewart had a great year last season, but played second fiddle to Tez Johnson in star power. This year, it should be him as the No. 1 threat and player personality many will follow.
NIL Valuation | $1.8 Million
National Rank – No. 21
Singleton is entering his senior year and is part of a running back tandem that should be very dangerous this season. He’s a star running back for Penn State, and that alone garners attention and a pretty significant NIL package.
No. 6 – Nico Iamaleava, Quarterback | UCLA Bruins
NIL Valuation | $2 Million
National Rank – No. 19
Nico is well-known after having a fantastic season last year with Tennessee. He is one of the most recognizable quarterbacks with all the potential he possesses with his dual-threat ability, and now he’ll be doing his work out in Westwood for UCLA.
NIL Valuation | $2.3 Million
National Rank – No. 17
Raiola’s commitment was highly publicized. He first committed to Ohio State, then Georgia, before finally landing at Nebraska, where he had family ties. He had a very impressive, though a bit inconsistent freshman campaign and should be poised for a continuation and further breakout in 2025.
No. 4 – Caleb Downs, Safety | Ohio State Buckeyes
NIL Valuation | $2.4 Million
National Rank – No. 15
Downs came to Ohio State via the transfer portal after becoming a freshman All-American at Alabama. He had a stellar sophomore campaign in Columbus and is a fan favorite. He might be the best defender in all of college football, playing for arguably the most-followed college football program. That all translates to a massive NIL package.
No. 3 – Bryce Underwood, Quarterback | Michigan Wolverines
NIL Valuation | $3 Million
National Rank – No. 10
There is a ton of hype for the No. 1 quarterback coming out of high school, and Michigan is hoping he makes good on all of it. There was a lot of buzz surrounding his recruitment, and he has many folks following what he might do at the college level, even though he has yet to do anything in Ann Arbor.
No. 2 – Drew Allar, Quarterback | Penn State Nittany Lions
NIL Valuation | $3.1 Million
National Rank – No. 8
Allar was a five-star quarterback coming out of Ohio before committing to play for Penn State. Though he has yet to win the biggest of games, he has a big arm and is the face of the Nittany Lions’ chances at not only making the College Football Playoff, but going on a run to a national championship.
No. 1 – Jeremiah Smith, Wide Receiver | Ohio State Buckeyes
NIL Valuation | $4.2 Million
National Rank – No. 3
Everyone knows Smith. He was an absolute star who flashed on the scene for Ohio State as a freshman after being ranked as the top overall recruit in the 2024 class. He more than made good on all that buzz and is arguably the best player in college football returning for two more seasons, still in Columbus. He is adored in Central Ohio and feared across the rest of the country.
Contact/Follow us @BuckeyesWire on X (formerly Twitter) and like our page on Facebook to follow ongoing coverage of Ohio State news, notes and opinion. Follow Phil Harrison on X.
-
High School Sports3 weeks ago
Parents Speak Out As Trans Pitcher Throws Shutout In MN State Quarterfinals
-
Professional Sports3 weeks ago
'I asked Anderson privately'… UFC legend retells secret sparring session between Jon Jones …
-
Health3 weeks ago
Oregon track star wages legal battle against trans athlete policy after medal ceremony protest
-
Professional Sports3 weeks ago
UFC 316 star storms out of Media Day when asked about bitter feud with Rampage Jackson
-
Motorsports1 week ago
NASCAR Weekend Preview: Autódromo Hermanos Rodríguez
-
NIL2 weeks ago
Patrick Mahomes in OKC for WCWS, praises NiJaree Canady and Texas Tech
-
College Sports3 weeks ago
Full 2025 Women’s College World Series Finals Schedule
-
NIL2 weeks ago
Greg Sankey fires jab at obstruction rule after controversial WCWS call in Texas vs. Texas Tech
-
NIL3 weeks ago
Texas Tech Pitcher’s $1M Deal Proves What’s Possible For Women
-
NIL3 weeks ago
Report