Connect with us
https://yoursportsnation.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/call-to-1.png

NIL

Five ways Covid

Published

on

Five ways Covid


Several US sports leagues, including MLB and the National Hockey League (NHL), also opened up new inventory on team uniforms to help franchises rebuild their sponsorship revenue and offer further value to partners.
More pertinently, though, many sports realised that they were sitting on digital and social media assets that would enable their sponsors to engage with their fans in more innovative, creative ways while events either weren’t taking place or happening behind closed doors.
Get access to richer content, exclusive reports, unparalleled business intelligence, and community benefits to help you navigate the next frontier of sport and make more informed decisions with a SportsPro+ Premium membership. Discover more here.
If ‘force majeure’ was the most-searched term in sponsorship contracts during Covid-19, then ‘make good’ will have been among the most used in the industry.

1. An evolution of the rights holder-sponsor relationship

Some of those sectors remain more active than others, but few have made as big a splash in sports sponsorship than the cryptocurrency category. The industry was responsible for deals cumulatively worth hundreds of millions of dollars in the years immediately after the pandemic, only for a large chunk of those to collapse when FTX slipped into bankruptcy.
Influencers might now feel like an accepted part of the sports ecosystem, but the role Covid played in thrusting them further into the limelight shouldn’t be underestimated.
Some influencers have launched their own brands which have used sports sponsorship to boost their awareness and grow credibility, while others continue to sell out huge venues for exhibition boxing bouts and soccer matches that have been watched by millions around the world.
“Some brands have maintained a strong commitment to purpose-driven initiatives, recognising the long-term brand equity they generate, while others have shifted focus back to performance-driven metrics and commercial objectives,” he continues.


According to Matt House, the chief executive of sports marketing agency SportQuake, what brands expect from their partnerships has therefore changed.
For example, Brazilian streamer Ibai Llanos launched the Fifa 20 LaLiga Santander Challenge, which was watched by more than one million viewers and won by then-Real Madrid player Marco Asensio.
Virtual competitions held in place of in-person events created some opportunities for new and existing sponsors, but months went by where only a handful of new deals were announced as brands waited for more certainty around when things would return to normal.
To that end, it’s been no surprise to see an increasing number of sports properties investing in fan data platforms or partnering with specialists who can enable them to show brands that they can reach their target audience by partnering with them.
While many brands chose to stand by their partners, perhaps wary of the optics of walking away from a sport in its hour of need, others spied an opportunity to make use of infamous ‘force majeure’ clauses, allow contracts to wind down quietly without renewing, or withhold payments if seasons were not completed.

2. Crypto headlines emerging digital-first sponsorship categories

From a marketing standpoint, brands swiftly realised that a pandemic wasn’t the time for them to be parading their products in front of consumers or making a lot of noise about their sponsorships.
By this point, event cancellations and suspensions were very much the norm, with the health crisis already putting domestic sports seasons, globe-trotting series and international tournaments on hold.
“Brands are exhibiting a heightened focus on measuring return on investment or return on objectives,” he explains. “There is an increased need to demonstrate tangible outcomes, such as increased brand awareness, purchase intent, and direct customer acquisition.
To illustrate just how much things have moved on, a recent study from Relo Metrics found that social media accounted for 54 per cent of Major League Soccer’s (MLS) sponsor media value in 2024, as well as 41 per cent for the Women’s National Basketball Association (WNBA) and 32 per cent for the National Basketball Association (NBA).
Even as sport enters a new era of marketing, House believes there’s still room for a balance.
Perhaps emboldened by the success of those one-off events, a more recent trend has seen creators help launch new sports properties such as Kings League and Baller League. With influencers at the heart of the action, quirky rules, and streaming-first distribution, they have already been able to secure sponsorships from major brands seeking to engage with their youthful audience.
Instead, this was a time for sponsors to show that they were suffering with their consumers, and several launched charitable campaigns where they could organically contribute to their communities.
“It will be interesting to see what potential impact the Trump government stance might have on this type of spending, particularly in the key US sports market and beyond.”
House points out that sponsors now want “unique marketing rights” that help them stand out and deliver against their brand objectives. Today, in a world where more content is being distributed across streaming and social platforms and some younger audiences primarily engage with sports on apps like TikTok, rights holders are carving out packages containing assets better suited to their partners’ needs.
While already an emerging trend prior to Covid-19, influencer marketing became a crucial medium through which brands could engage with their consumers during the pandemic.
In sport, the shift to online formats gave internet personalities an opportunity to further boost their profile by collaborating with professional athletes.


3. ‘Make goods’ stand the test of time as Covid accelerates shift to digital activation

Faced with significant revenue holes to plug, sports rights holders swiftly turned to new categories both during and in the immediate aftermath of the pandemic in the hope of generating additional sponsorship income.
While the health crisis created significant challenges for companies in more traditional sponsorship sectors like travel, several digital-first brands were able to prosper because of their ability to meet the changing needs of consumers now living in lockdown.
As House puts it, crypto has experienced “a rollercoaster ride from boom to bust and back again”.
That format was recreated across multiple sports as fans became increasingly familiar with streaming platforms like Twitch and the individuals regularly broadcasting to hundreds of thousands of engaged followers.
Plus, with more digital-first and high-growth technology brands investing in sports sponsorship, activations have evolved and range from online content series and branded metaverse experiences to challenges around digital collectibles and trophies generated using artificial intelligence (AI).

Since then, things have been trending back in the right direction. A recent study from the European Sponsorship Association (ESA) and Nielsen Sports found that sponsorship spending in Europe reached a record €23.41 billion last year, up from just under €22 billion in 2023 and – crucially – the pre-pandemic high of €20.26 billion in 2019.

Half a decade later, SportsPro picks out five ways the pandemic reshaped the sector – and which trends have endured.

The pandemic, alongside the civil unrest in North America sparked by the police killing of George Floyd, meant consumers were now looking for brands to stand for something, which led to a rise in purpose-driven marketing as sponsors looked to partner with socially conscious sports which could help them tell their story.
“While traditional marketing rights and assets remain crucial, digital and social media have become more integral to sponsorship activations,” he adds. “Experiential activations, amplified by digital and social, are also enjoying a comeback, showcasing the power of hybrid engagement models – like Nike’s recent activation with the London Eye.”
The rest, as they say, is history. Fast forward to today and creators have only become more influential in sports marketing.
The Covid-19 pandemic decimated the revenues of sports rights holders unable to fulfil their contractual obligations. At the time, Two Circles predicted that global sports sponsorship rights fees would fall by US billion in 2020, a drop of 37 per cent compared to the previous year.


4. Online formats and the mainstreaming of influencers

Despite its challenges, crypto is now an established sponsorship category in sports (Image credit: Getty Images)
On this day five years ago, the Rugby Football Union (RFU), Ladies Professional Golf Association (LPGA) and the World Snooker Tour (WST) were among the sports organisations to postpone or cancel events in response to the coronavirus pandemic.
No events meant no exposure for sponsors. Sports properties were forced to think on their feet about how to deliver value to their partners. And, as time went on, it led to calls for a rethink of how the sports sponsorship and marketing industry operates.
If Covid taught sports properties anything, then, it was that they needed to be more flexible to accommodate the evolving requirements of their partners.
However, as the world moves on from the pandemic, purpose has become less of a priority for brands shifting back towards performance marketing, particularly against the backdrop of an increasingly fractured political landscape.
In August 2020, IEG reported that US billion in sponsorship value needed to be made up, equal to more than 50 per cent of rights fees paid for that year. Indeed, the pandemic forced rights holders to find other ways to compensate partners for lost exposure and engagement, including through visibility during hastily arranged esports tournaments and virtual fan events.

While that is undoubtedly positive, macroeconomic headwinds mean brands are likely being more selective about where they deploy their sponsorship and marketing budgets, meaning measurement can no longer be an afterthought for rights holders.


5. Purpose comes and goes as priorities shift

“Crypto’s intersection with financial services and digital marketing suggests it could become a scaled sponsorship category akin to online sports betting, which went from being non-existent in 2004 to one of the top five spenders in sports sponsorship by 2024,” he adds.
“However, its future growth will depend on mainstream adoption and regulatory landscapes.”
Some rights holders, like Major League Baseball (MLB), made the best of games being played behind closed doors by replacing empty seats with sponsor branding. In many cases, that was delivered through virtual advertising technology, which has achieved much wider adoption in the wake of the pandemic.
“One key shift has been the greater use of first-party data, allowing brands to drive more targeted and measurable acquisition strategies.”
FTX’s demise – and so-called ‘crypto winter’ periods marked by a downturn in currency values and trading activity – reset sport’s relationship with the category. But the industry has shown signs of recovery over the last 18 months, with SportQuake tracking 22 deals between crypto businesses and rights holders up to late February, compared to 18 in the same period last year.
Previously unheard-of online car marketplaces such as Cazoo and Cinch and food delivery services like Uber Eats, Deliveroo and Getir moved swiftly to cement their brands in the minds of sports fans. There was also a notable increase in activity from companies specialising in areas such as video conferencing, cybersecurity, health tech, cashless payments and ecommerce.
Covid accelerated the rise of already popular streamers like Ibai Llanos (pictured above, left), who is now a prominent figure in Gerard Pique’s Kings League (Image credit: Getty Images)


That isn’t to say that it has been forgotten altogether, but House notes that the priority level “varies by brand and region”.

NIL

Brendan Sorsby, DJ Lagway could be Tennessee football quarterback picks

Published

on


Updated Dec. 15, 2025, 12:57 p.m. CT





Link

Continue Reading

NIL

Jon Sumrall donating $100,000 to Tulane’s NIL fund

Published

on


Dec. 15, 2025, 12:33 p.m. ET



Link

Continue Reading

NIL

Georgia Sues Former Linebacker in NIL Case That Could Set Precedent

Published

on


The University of Georgia Athletic Association (UGAA)’s NIL lawsuit against former linebacker Damon Wilson II, who transferred to Missouri earlier this year, could become a standard type of litigation as more and more athletes sign NIL deals with one school and then transfer to another. 

The specific legal dispute is straightforward: UGAA claims that Wilson, 20, breached his NIL contract with Classic City Collective (CCC)—a Georgia-aligned former NIL collective—and failed to pay a liquidated damages provision that was triggered upon breach.

A four-star recruit from Venice High School (Fla.), Wilson played for the Bulldogs in the 2023 and 2024 seasons and, while on the Tigers in 2025, earned second-team All-SEC recognition as he amassed nine sacks—tied for third-best in the SEC.

According to litigation records at Athens-Clarke County (Ga.) Superior Court, Wilson signed a 13-month, $500,000 NIL deal with CCC on Dec. 21, 2024. The deal runs from Dec. 1, 2024, to Jan. 31, 2026 and was contingent on Wilson being enrolled as a student at Georgia and part of the football team. He was paid $30,000, his first monthly licensing fee payment, on Dec. 25, 2024. UGAA emphasizes that Wilson accepted this payment, meaning the contract went into effect. On Jan. 6, 2025, Wilson announced he was entering the transfer portal, a move that Georgia says constituted a breach of the NIL deal.  About a week later Wilson withdrew from Georgia and began the process of transferring to Missouri. It’s unknown how much money Wilson received to transfer to Missouri.

Georgia moved to close CCC over the summer, when U.S. District Judge Claudia Wilken granted final approval of the House settlement, and has partnered with Learfield on NIL matters. Relevant to the school’s dispute with Wilson, CCC assigned its Wilson contract to UGAA, meaning the athletic association has the legal right to enforce the contract. 

UGAA argues that under the NIL deal’s liquidated damages clause, Wilson, as the licensor, must pay all remaining license fees that would have been payable. The remaining value, according to court filings, is $390,000. 

In May, attorney Spence Johnson wrote a demand letter to Wilson on behalf of CCC. The letter told Wilson that while CCC “does not want to unnecessarily undermine your financial future,” CCC also “insists that its student athletes be accountable for promises they make.” Wilson was told he had 14 days to pay or else CCC would “pursue legal action against you based on your breaches” of the NIL deal.

In August, Johnson wrote another letter to Wilson. Johnson said that UGAA had been assigned Wilson’s NIL deal with CCC. The letter indicated Wilson didn’t pay as demanded and that the NIL deal calls for arbitration to resolve disputes. In October, UGAA, through Johnson, filed a lawsuit to compel arbitration, with the complaint stating that Wilson hasn’t responded to demand for arbitration. There is no attorney listed for Wilson and it does not appear from the court docket he has responded to the litigation.

The actual legal controversy—alleged breach of contract—is ordinary, but the circumstances are extraordinary. A university, through its athletic association, is suing a former student athlete who transferred for reneging on his NIL deal. 

A lawsuit like UGAA v. Wilson would have been inconceivable five years ago, but in the new college sports world, it’s the kind of case that could become more common. 

Through antitrust litigation and accompanying settlements, college athletes can now transfer without sitting out of sports for a period of time. That approach is consistent with college students in general as they can transfer schools, but typical college students aren’t signing NIL deals.

There’s plenty of money to be made, too, for power conference football players to switch schools. University-aligned NIL collectives can pay athletes, some of whom also stand to benefit from the injunctive relief portion of the House settlement. Participating colleges can directly pay athletes a share of up to 22% of the average power conference athletic media, ticket and sponsorship revenue, with $20.5 million pegged as the initial annual cap. There are thus three buckets of money for some college athletes: revenue share, NIL deals and athletic scholarships.

And playing in college could become something of a career depending on the ultimate trajectory of antitrust litigation brought by Vanderbilt quarterback and former JUCO transfer Diego Pavia—the runner-up for the 2025 Heisman Trophy—and other seasoned college athletes. They wish to continue playing college football past the NCAA eligibility clock, which limits eligibility to four seasons of intercollegiate competition, including JUCO and D-II play, within a five-year period.

College sports, at least football at power conference schools, resembles professional sports—except without free agency restrictions and similar player restraints found in the NFL. Those restraints are lawful because the NFL collectively bargains them with the NFL players association. They are thus protected by the non-statutory labor exemption, which reflects U.S. Supreme Court decisions that provide antitrust immunity for bargained rules relating to wages, hours and other working conditions. The non-statutory labor exemption can’t apply in college football because the athletes are, for now at least, not recognized as employees and under labor law only employees can unionize. 

Unless and until college football players are recognized as employees who in turn unionize, cases like UGAA v. Wilson could happen again and again. That’s not necessarily a bad thing, it’s just a reflection of the chaotic blend of pro and amateur sports known as modern day power conference football.



Link

Continue Reading

NIL

Billy Napier back in Sun Belt at James Madison. It’s a changed world from Louisiana-Lafayette days

Published

on


Billy Napier thrived in the Sun Belt Conference before. Now he’s back in taking over at James Madison. But it’s a very different landscape since he won big at…

HARRISONBURG, Va.(AP) — Four years ago, Billy Napier walked away from a Sun Belt Conference powerhouse he had built at Louisiana-Lafayette. It was, in part, because he wasn’t sure how that program would handle the financial challenges of new rules allowing college athletes to profit from their name, image and likeness.

Four years later, Napier is returning to the league with James Madison. And the Dukes’ ability to compete financially was one of the main drivers behind his decision to become the successor to UCLA-bound Bob Chesney.

“This place has what it takes to dominate the competition for sure,” Napier said of a program ranked No. 19 in the AP Top 25 and headed to the College Football Playoff.

Napier went 40-12 in four seasons at Louisiana-Lafayette, dominating Sun Belt competition. His Ragin’ Cajuns won the Western Division all four years he was there and claimed league championships in his final two seasons. He was twice named the league’s coach of the year.

But after posting a 12-1 record and his second Sun Belt title in 2021, Napier left for Florida.

“I stayed at Louisiana after Year 2 when we had opportunities, after Year 3 when we had opportunities,” Napier said. “And we probably, truth be known, would have stayed longer if it wasn’t for NIL. Because we know that was coming. We knew that roster was going to be tough to keep together.”

Changed landscape

Napier went 22-23 at Florida, starting this season 3-4 when he was fired in his fourth year leading the Gators.

As he surveyed the landscape, considering his future, he thought a lot about how college football had changed since he first took over at Louisiana-Lafayette in 2018. The NIL rules allowing college athletes to cash in on their fame went live in summer 2021, while this year marked the arrival of revenue sharing following the $2.8 billion House antitrust settlement.

“It’s very different,” Napier said. “Obviously (revenue sharing) is ultimately a huge difference maker at the Group of Six level. Now, you evaluate jobs relative to alignment, resources — which basically means building infrastructure and hiring a great staff — and then the rev share that allows you to compensate really good players.”

Napier said that, the transfer portal and roster limits following the House settlement have changed the game since he last coached in the Sun Belt.

“But ultimately, football’s football,” Napier said. “We’re going to need to evaluate well. Basically going to recruit a high school cycle each year. Then you’re going to recruit a portal cycle each year. Then start over.”

Those changes aren’t something Napier is thinking about in the abstract.

He jumps right into one of the most awkward positions in the country — seeking to retain players of a CFP-bound team while their current coach presumably is hoping to take some of the Dukes’ top talent with him west to UCLA. (No. 12 seed JMU faces No. 5 Oregon on Saturday night.)

“I’m for transparency,” Napier said. “Let’s rip the Band-Aid off. Who are you taking? And who wants to go?”

Roster management

When Curt Cignetti left JMU for Indiana, he took 13 of the program’s top players with him. That group includes the Hoosiers’ leader in rushing touchdowns (Kaelon Black), its leader in receiving scores (Elijah Sarratt), its leader in pass breakups (D’Angelo Ponds) and its second-leading tackler (Aiden Fisher).

Nine former JMU players started multiple games this season for top-ranked Indiana, which beat then-No. 2 Ohio State for the Big Ten Conference title and is the top seed in the 12-team playoff.

Chesney had to rebuild JMU almost entirely from scratch. He brought in 58 new players his first season.

Athletic director Matt Roan said he and Chesney navigated the entire season with openness and honesty, starting with UCLA’s first inquiries about Chesney after Week 3. That gives him confidence that Chesney and Napier will be able to work simultaneously and professionally toward the future of both coaches’ programs.

“We were very transparent throughout,” Roan said. “The day that UCLA announced that DeShaun Foster was being removed as the head coach, they started calling. And every program in America started calling. And we would have those open, honest conversations about where things could go. We’ve been the adults in the room.”

JMU president Jim Schmidt expressed confidence the Dukes will remain successful under Napier no matter how the fight over players turns out.

“I have no doubt that we may lose some talented players to UCLA,” Schmidt said. “We certainly lost some talented players to Indiana. I believe that we will retain the right players and I believe Coach Billy will bring some great players to round that out.”

Get poll alerts and updates on the AP Top 25 throughout the season. Sign up here and here (AP News mobile app). AP college football: https://apnews.com/hub/ap-top-25-college-football-poll and https://apnews.com/hub/college-football



Link

Continue Reading

NIL

Jon Sumrall donating $100,000 to Tulane’s NIL fund

Published

on


So much for the whole “taking out a full-page ad in the local newspaper” move. Future-former Tulane head coach Jon Sumrall and his wife Ginny have put their money where their mouths are, as on Monday they announced a $100,000 donation to the Green Wave Talent Fund. 

The donation will give new Green Wave head coach Will Hall a head start on building upon Sumrall’s success. 

“Tulane University and New Orleans are special to me and my family,” said Sumrall. “Ginny and I are honored to support the Green Wave Talent Fund because we believe in the vision of Tulane Athletics and want to contribute to the continued success of its student-athletes. The future is incredibly bright, and we are excited for Will Hall and his family to be part of it.”

“Coach Hall possesses a keen understanding of Tulane University and its football program, along with a passion that greatly benefits the Green Wave. As a leader, he cares deeply about helping others reach their full potential and is dedicated to equipping them to achieve that goal in every way possible. He has our family’s full support, and we wish him nothing but success as he leads Tulane Football!”

Sumrall, of course, has accepted the head coaching position at Florida, which will officially begin at the conclusion of Tulane’s College Football Playoff run. Sumrall is 20-7 with two berths in the American Championship in his two seasons atop the program, building upon the success of Willie Fritz, who went 23-4 with two berths in the American Championship, one conference title, a Cotton Bowl win and an AP No. 9 finish in his final two seasons with the program. 

Tulane is one of three programs to play in four straight conference title games (Boise State and Georgia are the others), and the Sumralls’ gift helps Hall build a team that can make it five in a row.

“We are grateful to Jon and Ginny for this incredible gift,” said AD David Harris. “Their leadership and generosity will have a direct and lasting impact on our student-athletes as we continue to grow and elevate Tulane Athletics.”

Hall was Tulane’s offensive coordinator in 2019-20 and returned to New Orleans as passing game coordinator this season. He holds a career 70-50 record as a head coach, including a 25-11 run at West Alabama from 2011-13, a 31-9 mark with two Division II semifinal trips from 2014-16 at West Georgia, and a 14-30 mark over four seasons at Southern Miss. 



Link

Continue Reading

NIL

The 8 best players in this year’s College Football Playoff

Published

on


The Heisman hype is finally over, so time to move on to arguing who is actually the best player in this year’s College Football Playoff. There’s no politics, no consideration of position or age or the endless parade of hassle that can make the Heisman drag. The best news– we’ll settle it all (more or less) on the field. Here’s the eight best players in this year’s College Football Playoff.

1. Jeremiah Smith, Ohio State

Smith is the best player in college football as a true sophomore. He caught 80 passes for 1,086 yards and 11 touchdowns this season for Ohio State. Smith put up five different 100 yard receiving games and was by far the prime mover and shaker at the most dangerous big-play passing attack in the nation. Sayin gets the headlines and the Heisman support, but Smith is the most untouchable talent in his entire sport.

2. Fernando Mendoza, Indiana

So he’s not the best, but he’s pretty darn close. The best argument for Mendoza is that few if any quarterbacks could make Indiana take off with the gusto that Mendoza managed all season. Mendoza has thrown for 2,980 yards and 33 touchdowns while running for 240 yards and six more scores. He’s impressively consistent, is a natural leader, and has done things at Indiana that were previously unimaginable. He deserved the Heisman… but he’s not the best player in the CFP.

3. Jacob Rodriguez, Texas Tech LB

The best defensive player in the nation, there’s an argument to be made that Rodriguez is the best overall. He’s already racked up 117 tackles, 11 tackles for loss, four interceptions, and a pair of rushing touchdowns just for fun. He is the engine that makes the ridiculously good Texas Tech defense roll. The only reason he’s not higher than he is would be that Tech’s defense would still be formidable without him. But it probably wouldn’t be in the CFP.

4. Julian Sayin, Ohio State

Yes, it feels like anybody could succeed at QB for Ohio State. But it only feels that way because of how smooth and effortless Sayin makes his job seem. He’s completing 78.4% of his passes on the year for 3,323 yards and 31 touchdowns. If that sounds like video game numbers, it’s because Sayin makes Ohio State’s excellent feel inevitable.

5. Trinidad Chambliss, Ole Miss

No Gunner Stockton or Ty Simpson make an appearance here, but Diego Pavia aside, Chambliss was the class of the SEC. Despite starting the season as a backup, he has 3,016 passing yards and another 470 yards on the ground, with a combined 24 touchdowns. He started his career as a starter with three 300+ yard passing games and has replicated that feat in his last three games heading into the CFP.

6. Louis Moore, Indiana

Moore is one of the great weird stories of the season. A JUCO guy who came to Indiana and played well in the struggilng pre-Cignetti days, he transferred to Ole Miss for 2024. He then returned to Indiana for 2025, sued the NCAA to gain eligibility, and played like a maniac. Moore has 74 tackles and six interceptions. He’s 24 years old, he’s back at a school he originally left, and he’s a magnet for the ball at cornerback.

7. Francis Mauigoa, Miami

Offensive linemen tend to get more blame than credit. They don’t put up massive totals of stats and they get noticed mostly when they pick up a holding penalty or a false start. But Mauigoa is the real deal. He’s helped keep Carson Beck clean, with Miami allowing just 11 total sacks all season. Mauigoa was already great. He almost never gets beat in the trenches and probably is the biggest reason that Miami is even in the CFP.

8. Cashius Howell, Texas A&M

The former Bowling Green edge rusher was an absolute terror to opposing linemen. In the 2025 season, Howell has racked up 14 tackles for loss, including 11.5 sacks. He didn’t just feast off easy opponents– 8.5 of those sacks came in SEC play. Howell’s athleticism allows A&M to play aggressively and freely on defense, with no real fear of mistakes. He’s a game-changer.



Link

Continue Reading

Most Viewed Posts

Trending