NIL
Four big takeaways from Judy MacLeod’s speech at CUSA Media Day
Conference USA Media Day kicked off on Tuesday, and Commissioner Judy MacLeod addressed a multitude of topics surrounding the conference. Here are four of the most interesting things she said during her speech.
On the changing times in athletics:
“I don’t think there’s a day goes by that there isn’t something about one of the topics – whether it’s the House Settlement, Congressional activity, eligibility litigation, college sports commission, NIL Go, other litigation, Presidential activity, the College Football Playoff, transfer portal. I could take my entire 10 minutes up here and just rattle off the list, but I’ll stop there.”
“Obviously it’s a new time, it’s a transformational time in college athletics with so much happening so quickly. We need to continue to modernize and evolve. It’s something that college athletics has been slow to do in the past. It’s been forced on us, for good reason. It’s really important that we have standards and we have rules. That’s going to be a challenge going forward. The opportunity to work with young people and have an impact on them, to work with them towards earning a degree, completing a degree, is still going to be very central to our mission.”
“We need things like the College Sports Commission and NIL Go to work. We need that to work. I know there are naysayers, I know there are people that want it to fail out of the gates, but we need that to work. We need Congressional help. We also need to keep including our student athletes and their voice in our decision-making processes moving forward. It’s taken a ton of work to get to this point, it’s going to take a ton more, but I believe college athletics is worth it. It’s going to take everybody to do that. That’s a tall task, but I think those of us involved in it, that have dedicated our lives to it, believe in that and will work hard to achieve those goals.”
On the 2025 football season:
“We are really excited to welcome our two new schools – Delaware and Missouri State. We have a big game week zero, not too far away. We have a conference matchup that could turn into a real critical game for the standings in Sam Houston and WKU.”
“People ask me, ‘Who is going to be your good team this year?’ It’s really hard to tell these days. There’s a stat for everything these days, we have average returning production of 54%, which leads our peers. That tells me we do have a lot of veteran talent coming back that can help guide our teams and help those teams gel a little more quickly.”
“I have a lot of faith in our coaches. We have had some turnover. We have six new coaches this year, that includes the two that are not new to their school, but are new to Conference USA with Delaware and Missouri State. These men get it. They get why they’re doing what they’re doing. They are ultra competitive and have had success at many places. We are confident with that group.”
On the future of the conference:
“Our media package with CBS Sports Network and the ESPN Family of Networks is entering year three. About half of our games will be on linear and half will be on ESPN+. It’s made it very easy for our fans to find our contests. We continue to embrace and build on weekday CUSA. We didn’t want you guys not to have anything to do on a Tuesday, Wednesday, or Thursday so we added some games for you. Last year, we had eight games during that period decided by single digits. We also had seven games with 60 or more points. It is a really exciting brand of football. You get to go unopposed. Sometimes you are the only game on TV. That exposure has been really incredible for us as we continue to build the conference.”
On realignment:
“Realignment is hard. I don’t think it ever gets any easier, but I do feel like we’ve done a great job of rebuilding and continuing to position the conference well. I have to give a ton of credit to our Board of Directors which is composed of all our Presidents. They are in charge of membership, and they have been very thoughtful. I do believe the FCS schools that we have brought in to transition have had a lot of success. I’m obviously biased, but I feel like we’ve made a lot of great choices. We have programs that have histories of success. A lot of times it’s a lot easier when you have a program that’s had success at other levels to transition that success forward, but our staff has done a great job with the administrations of each school and really tried to help them. Help them understand what that step is. I don’t know if that’s something we want to be known for – of transitioning schools, but we have had success and we’re excited with the new two that are coming aboard as well.”
“As far as future, we have membership on our board agenda every time we meet. We have a membership committee. It’s active. It’s always looking at different data and doing it for research about what may happen. We are really excited about the 10 we have moving forward. Unfortunately, I can’t predict things. I don’t think anything is going to happen in the time I’m sitting here, but you never know. I put my phone on silent so I wouldn’t get interrupted. You never want to walk out and get surprised, but I do feel very good about our core schools and continuing to grow.”
NIL
Charles Barkley on NIL, transfer portal: ‘You should not have the ability to get a better offer every year’
NBA legend Charles Barkley has not been shy about his thoughts on NIL and the transfer portal. During Saturday’s Kentucky vs. Indiana broadcast, he candidly discussed the landscape again.
Barkley called the game on ESPN alongside Dick Vitale, the first of two games they will work together. Vitale called for “stability” in college basketball – and college sports as a whole – because of the amount of player movement via the portal. He used Indiana as an example since new coach Darian DeVries virtually built the program from scratch.
Advertisement
SUBSCRIBE to the On3 NIL and Sports Business Newsletter
While Barkley acknowledged he’s in favor of athletes making money through NIL, he also called out players staying more than their four years of eligibility. In addition, he disagreed with the idea of athletes being allowed to seek better offers after every season.
“No. 1, I’m not opposed to players getting paid,” Barkley said on the broadcast. “I always want my players to get treated fairly. But I can’t remember the last time I heard the word, COVID. Some of these guys have been in college for six or seven years. If you’re in college for six or seven years, your name better be, ‘Dr. Somebody.’ You should not still be playing college basketball after six or seven years.
“But you should not have the ability to get a better offer every year. That’s not fair to any school that you are affiliated with because I can’t even do that. None of us can do that, take a better – Amazon, anybody or FOX Sports can come and say, ‘Well, we’ll give you more money and you can leave after every year.’ That’s not fair. … We’ve got to put some guardrails on these sports.”
Advertisement
One of the other new parts of the college basketball landscape is G-League players seeking eligibility. The NCAA has changed its approach regarding players who played in the G-League, arguing they were not professional athletes in a way the old rule said. Instead, if those players are within five years of their high school graduation, they could become eligible unless they went through the NBA Draft process or signed an NBA contract.
To Charles Barkley, that’s another area that needs fixing. He does not think former G-League players should be able to play college basketball.
“We’ve got guys playing in the G-League coming back to college sports now,” he said. “I don’t think that’s fair.”
NIL
Charles Barkley sends strong message after historic college football program’s CFP snub
Hall of Famer and ESPN basketball analyst Charles Barkley has an opinion on most everything, and that includes the College Football Playoff committee’s decision to leave 10-2 Notre Dame off of the 12-team bracket.
Barkley and ESPN college basketball analyst Dick Vitale discussed the Fighting Irish’s CFP snub while calling the Indiana-Kentucky game on Saturday night.
“I was disappointed, but you could see it coming in the last couple polls,” Barkley said. “They were creeping up on Miami. And my biggest problem with the whole thing, everybody’s talked about head-to-head. First of all, that was in August.
“They were very close games [against] A&M and at Miami, but your team is not the same in August as it is in December. Notre Dame is playing as well as anybody in the country other than Indiana and probably Ohio State. And I don’t want to leave out the [Georgia] Bulldogs. Kirby Smart, that man can really coach.”

Notre Dame’s exclusion from the bracket after winning its final 10 games all by double-digit margins and being ranked ahead of Miami (10-2) in every CFP poll until the final one, even though neither the Irish nor Hurricanes played in that final week before the bracket was set, will go down as one of the biggest playoff controversies.
Ultimately, it came down to Miami’s 27-24 home win over Notre Dame in Week 1, a field goal with 1:04 remaining.
Miami supporters clamored and complained all along that the Hurricanes should have been ranked ahead of the Irish, given the same record, well before the final bracket was set. But the teams’ seasons went very different directions after that Week 1 meeting.
Notre Dame lost its first two games by a combined four points, including a 41-40 Week 2 loss to Texas A&M (another CFP team), before reeling off those 10 straight wins, most in dominant fashion.
Miami lost twice in a three-game span to unranked Louisville and SMU before regrouping and finishing strong.
The first CFP rankings came out after that second loss, with Miami landing at No. 18 and Notre Dame at No. 10. Because the teams weren’t close in their overall ranking, the head-to-head result didn’t factor in at the time, and that remained the CFP committee’s explanation even as the teams moved closer and closer in the rankings.
Ultimately, they were two spots apart at No. 10/12, separated by BYU, entering last weekend, when the Cougars got blown out by Texas Tech, essentially forcing the committee to consider Notre Dame and Miami side by side. Others have suggested that both teams deserved to be in over 10-3 Alabama, which lost 28-7 to Georgia in the SEC championship game.
Notre Dame has not taken the snub well and declined to participate in a bowl game as a result.
No. 10-seed Miami will play at No. 7 Texas A&M in the first round of the playoffs on Dec. 20.
NIL
President Donald Trump calls NIL a ‘disaster’ for college athletics, Olympics
President Trump this weekend noted the “current state of NIL is simply not sustainable and could cause serious damage to college athletics, and even the Olympics.” Trump during an event hosting members of the 1980 Miracle on Ice team said, “I think that it’s a disaster for college sports. I think it’s a disaster for the Olympics.” Trump: “The colleges are cutting a lot of their — they would call them sort of the ‘lesser’ sports, and they’re losing them like at numbers nobody can believe. They were really training grounds, beautiful training grounds, hard-working, wonderful young people.” Trump added, “A lot of these sports that were training so well would win gold medals because of it. Those sports don’t exist, because they’re putting all their money into football.” Trump: “Colleges cannot afford to be paying the kind of salaries that you’re hearing about” (OUTKICK, 12/13). Trump said of overhauling NIL in college sports, “Something ought to be done, and I’m willing to put the federal government behind it. And if it’s not done fast, you’re going to wipe out colleges” (USA TODAY, 12/12).
NIL
ESPN FPI has 2 teams tied as College Football Playoff favorites
If you can’t pick one favorite, maybe it’s wise to pick two. That certainly seems to be the logical play with ESPN, as their FPI rankings give two teams an even chance to win the national title– even beyond the tenth of a percent. FPI is a slightly controversial prediction index that ties past performance into a mathematical attempt to predict future results.
Throughout the 2025 season, ESPN not only ranked the teams, but forecast their chance to win their respectives leagues, to earn a CFP berth, and even to win the CFP title. But heading into the opening week of CFP play, two teams are in exactly the same shape on top of ESPN’s ranking of most likely teams to win the national title.
FPI’s title favorites
Both Ohio State and Indiana are given a 25.9% chance to win the CFP title. Interestingly, Ohio State is slightly more likely to reach the title game, in ESPN’s reckoning (a 45% chance for the Buckeyes against a 43.1% chance for Indiana). The two are massive co-favorites, as ESPN’s third team in terms of title likelihood is Georgia, with an 11.6% shot at winning the title.
The Remainder of the CFP field
The only other teams with a better than 10% chance at the championship are Texas Tech and Oregon. The Red Raiders are rated at a 10.9% chance to win the title. The Ducks are rated with a 10.3% chance to grab the title.
No team outside of those five has a greater than 4.8% chance at winning the title– with that particular figure being linked to Ole Miss’s title chances. ESPN’s computers certainly don’t think well of the two Group of Five teams, as ESPN gives both Tulane and James Madison a 0.1% chance at winning the CFP crown. James Madison is rated with an 0.5% chance of reaching the title game, while Tulane’s chance is 0.4%.
Confusion reigns about FPI’s ratings
The math-related details behind the CFP can be complicated. 6-6 Penn State is still FPI’s No. 17 team in the nation, while 5-7 Auburn is No. 26. FPI also greatly appreciated Notre Dame, ranking the Irish third nationally. That’s comfortably ahead of the Miami and Alabama teams that grabbed the last CFP spots instead of the Irish (Miami ranks seventh and Notre Dame eighth at all. But when it comes to title chances, the FPI is all in on two teams in an exactly equal measure.

NIL
Charles Barkley on NIL, transfer portal: ‘You should not have the ability to get a better offer every year’
NBA legend Charles Barkley has not been shy about his thoughts on NIL and the transfer portal. During Saturday’s Kentucky vs. Indiana broadcast, he candidly discussed the landscape again.
Barkley called the game on ESPN alongside Dick Vitale, the first of two games they will work together. Vitale called for “stability” in college basketball – and college sports as a whole – because of the amount of player movement via the portal. He used Indiana as an example since new coach Darian DeVries virtually built the program from scratch.
SUBSCRIBE to the On3 NIL and Sports Business Newsletter
While Barkley acknowledged he’s in favor of athletes making money through NIL, he also called out players staying more than their four years of eligibility. In addition, he disagreed with the idea of athletes being allowed to seek better offers after every season.
“No. 1, I’m not opposed to players getting paid,” Barkley said on the broadcast. “I always want my players to get treated fairly. But I can’t remember the last time I heard the word, COVID. Some of these guys have been in college for six or seven years. If you’re in college for six or seven years, your name better be, ‘Dr. Somebody.’ You should not still be playing college basketball after six or seven years.
“But you should not have the ability to get a better offer every year. That’s not fair to any school that you are affiliated with because I can’t even do that. None of us can do that, take a better – Amazon, anybody or FOX Sports can come and say, ‘Well, we’ll give you more money and you can leave after every year.’ That’s not fair. … We’ve got to put some guardrails on these sports.”
One of the other new parts of the college basketball landscape is G-League players seeking eligibility. The NCAA has changed its approach regarding players who played in the G-League, arguing they were not professional athletes in a way the old rule said. Instead, if those players are within five years of their high school graduation, they could become eligible unless they went through the NBA Draft process or signed an NBA contract.
To Charles Barkley, that’s another area that needs fixing. He does not think former G-League players should be able to play college basketball.
“We’ve got guys playing in the G-League coming back to college sports now,” he said. “I don’t think that’s fair.”
NIL
$29 million college football coach surges as favorite to replace Sherrone Moore at Michigan
Michigan began the week coming off a 9–3 regular season, with a Citrus Bowl matchup against No. 13 Texas on December 31 looming.
Instead, an internal investigation and a subsequent arrest that led to criminal charges left the Wolverines without head coach Sherrone Moore, forcing the athletic department into a high-stakes national search for his successor.
Moore, hired Jan. 26, 2024, and elevated from Michigan’s staff, completed two seasons as Michigan’s head coach with a record of 18-8.
Several names have circulated in the wake of Moore’s dismissal, but few have drawn more immediate attention than Arizona State head coach Kenny Dillingham, who, according to Kalshi, emerged as the market favorite with a 58% implied probability to land the Michigan job.
This puts him well ahead of Alabama’s Kalen DeBoer (19%), Washington’s Jedd Fisch (13%), and Los Angeles Chargers defensive coordinator Jesse Minter (3%).
NEW: Kenny Dillingham has surged to a 58% chance on Kalshi to be the next head coach of Michigan Football. pic.twitter.com/bi5vATin0M
— Kalshi Sports (@KalshiSports) December 13, 2025
Dillingham’s Sun Devils rose from a 3-9 debut season to an 11-3, Big 12-championship campaign in 2024, then followed it with another solid 8-4 finish in 2025 despite losing former four-star quarterback Sam Leavitt midway through the year.
At just 34, the Arizona State alumnus has already rebuilt his alma mater into a conference champion and College Football Playoff participant, helping explain why his name has emerged as a focal point in both media coverage and prediction markets.
After that breakout 2024 season, Arizona State extended Dillingham through 2029, raising his 2025 base salary to $5.8 million as part of a $29 million agreement.

NCAA transfer portal rule changes moved the primary window to Jan. 2-16 and limited the special window after coaching changes to 15 days, beginning five days after a new hire is announced, giving Michigan a clear incentive to move quickly to retain players and recruits.
That timetable, combined with the expectation to uphold the championship standard Moore inherited, has accelerated Michigan’s process, with a decision expected within the coming weeks.
Read More at College Football HQ
- $1.3 million college football coach reportedly accepts head coaching job
- First-team All-Conference WR enters college football transfer portal
- College football program loses 11 players to transfer portal
- $2.5 college football coach reportedly accepts new head coaching job after winning season
-
Rec Sports3 weeks agoFargo girl, 13, dies after collapsing during school basketball game – Grand Forks Herald
-
Motorsports3 weeks agoCPG Brands Like Allegra Are Betting on F1 for the First Time
-
Sports3 weeks agoTwo Pro Volleyball Leagues Serve Up Plans for Minnesota Teams
-
Sports3 weeks agoUtah State Announces 2025-26 Indoor Track & Field Schedule
-
Sports3 weeks agoSycamores unveil 2026 track and field schedule
-
Motorsports2 weeks agoJo Shimoda Undergoes Back Surgery
-
Motorsports2 weeks agoRedemption Means First Pro Stock World Championship for Dallas Glenn
-
Sports3 weeks agoTexas volleyball vs Kentucky game score: Live SEC tournament updates
-
Rec Sports2 weeks agoRobert “Bobby” Lewis Hardin, 56
-
Rec Sports2 weeks agoHow this startup (and a KC sports icon) turned young players into card-carrying legends overnight





