Softball America keeps track of all college softball conference awards as they roll in throughout the rest of the postseason.

SEC
ACC
Big 12
Big Ten
Atlantic 10
America East
AAC
ASUN
Big East
Big Sky

Player of the Year: Ava Brown, Idaho State
Pitcher of the Year: Kasey Aguinaga, Idaho State
Co-Freshman of the Year: Madison Evers-Lyles, Sac State/Sadie Kirk, Weber State
Tri-Top Newcomer of the Year: Kasey Aguinaga, Idaho State/Katie Walling, Northern Colorado/Lafulafu Melepeai, Sac State
Coach of the Year: Andrew Rich, Idaho State*

Big West
CAA
CUSA
Horizon League
Ivy League
MAAC

Player of the Year: Miah McDonald, Marist
Defensive Player of the Year: Anna Paravati, Marish
Pitcher of the Year: Maddie Pleasants, Marist
Rookie of the Year: Tabitha von Kolen, Canisius
Coach of the Year: Joe Ausanio, Marist

MAC
MEAC
Mountain West
MVC
NEC
OVC
Patriot
SoCon
Southland
Summit
Sun Belt
SWAC
WAC
WCC

More from Softball America:

Hagens Berman, Law Firm Behind Massive NCAA NIL Litigation, Says Talk of Executive Order and Saban’s Interfering are Unmerited

Law firm co-leading historic NIL litigation spotlights the best aspects of incoming changes amid Coach Saban’s “unneeded self-involvement”

Attorneys at Hagens Berman representing a class of hundreds of thousands of current and former college athletes in a pending historic $2.78 billion settlement with the NCAA — including a revenue sharing provision worth at least $20 billion — say talk of an executive order and eleventh-hour self-importance from University of Alabama’s ex-football coach, Nick Saban, is unmerited and unhelpful.

“While he was a coach, Saban initially opposed NIL payments to athletes, pushing to add restrictions and red-tape through national legislation to add ‘some sort of control.’ During his time scrutinizing the athlete pay structure, he made tens of millions of dollars and was previously the highest-paid coach in college football,” said firm managing partner and co-founder, Steve Berman, who serves as court-appointed co-lead counsel in the litigation, of the settlement slated to become one of the largest antitrust class-action settlements in history.

“Coach Saban and Trump’s eleventh-hour talks of executive orders and other meddling are just more unneeded self-involvement,” Berman said. “College athletes are spearheading historic changes and benefitting massively from NIL deals. They don’t need this unmerited interference from a coach only seeking to protect the system that made him tens of millions.”

The antitrust class-action lawsuit against the NCAA will bring historic changes to college sports and will allow college athletes to be fairly compensated for the use of their name, image and likeness (NIL) in what has become a multibillion-dollar industry. The firm’s attorneys have fought in the area of sports litigation for two decades.

How Have Changes to NIL Rights Benefitted NCAA Athletes Without Any Executive Order?

1. Allowing payments to college athletes improves the overall fairness of college sports, from schools to coaches to players. College sports is a multibillion-dollar entertainment industry that generates over $19 billion per year. For decades, college sports have existed upon the mantle of athletes performing solely “for the love of the game” while coaches were often their state’s highest earning public employee on the payroll. For example, while University of Alabama’s ex-coach Saban touts his opinion on limiting athletes in this new landscape, he will receive a $500,000 salary in his new advisory role with the university, a hypocritical standpoint to say the least.
2. NCAA athletes are empowered to earn their own income. The total value of new payments and benefits to college athletes is expected to exceed $20 billion over the next 10 years, and college athletes who were once left with no compensation for their hard work, entertainment value and tireless physical efforts are now given a fair place at the table in the realm of college sports. NIL payments inherently allow athletes to operate more independently and make choices based on the accurate value of their capabilities. Historically, college sports have included many Black and low-income athletes, who now stand to receive the full benefits of their value.
3. NIL deals allow college athletes to explore a new realm of business, learning about business management and branding. NCAA athletes now have the opportunity to engage in a lucrative area of endorsements, product placements, social media deals and other business ventures, giving them a first-hand education in business management and sports business, a growing market with tangible value. College athletes may also hire professionals to assist in the areas of tax law, legal issues or marketing.
4. NCAA sports is a hugely lucrative space, allowing college athletes massive rewards. Individual athletes have secured NIL deals in the millions and numerous college athletes have taken advantage of the opportunity to secure major deals. College athletes receive the ability to invest in themselves, their careers and their futures.
5. Statistically, sports media outlets have reported that with the induction of NIL deals, more athletes seem to be opting to stay in school. Prior to NIL deals, a college athlete had few benefits to remaining in school, especially if faced with an injury. Taking their skills into professional athletics in the future is already a slim chance. With the inclusion of name, image and likeness payments, NCAA athletes have another benefit to staying the course and completing college, which will benefit them in myriad ways. Athletes are also incentivized to do well academically by this same mindset.

The settlement process is being thoroughly reviewed by Judge Claudia A. Wilken of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California who in the April settlement fairness hearing requested further attention to details concerning roster limits and other aspects of the settlement.

The preliminarily approved settlement resolves three pending antitrust lawsuits, House v. NCAA, Hubbard v. NCAA, and Carter v. NCAA. As part of the settlement, the NCAA and its conferences will pay more than $2.78 billion in damages to college athletes over a 10-year period, eliminate rules prohibiting schools from making direct payments to athletes, and dramatically expand the availability of compensation and benefits available to athletes. This includes eliminating restrictions on the number of available athletic scholarships across all Division I sports.

Class members in the three affected cases may find out more about the claim process by visiting the settlement website at collegeathletecompensation.com. Find out more about the class-action lawsuit against the NCAA and its member conferences.

About Hagens Berman

Hagens Berman is a global plaintiffs’ rights complex litigation law firm with a tenacious drive for achieving real results for those harmed by corporate negligence and fraud. Since its founding in 1993, the firm’s determination has earned it numerous national accolades, awards and titles of “Most Feared Plaintiff’s Firm,” MVPs and Trailblazers of class-action law. More about the law firm and its successes can be found at www.hbsslaw.com. Follow the firm for updates and news at @ClassActionLaw.

Media Contact

Ash Klann

pr@hbsslaw.com

206-268-9363

View source version on businesswire.com: https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20250505781601/en/

This Sentell’s Intel rep on Georgia football recruiting has the latest with 5-star QB Jared Curtis at Nashville Christian in Tennessee. He ranks as the nation’s No. 1 QB and the No. 2 overall prospect for 2026 on the 247Sports Composite. The On3 Industry Ranking has him as the No. 1 QB and No. 6 overall.

As far as recruiting storylines go, there will be a ceremony this evening that offers the Super Bowl of decisions. It’s hard to top the intrigue of a 5-star QB commitment shutting down his process.

Jared Curtis, the nation’s No. 1 QB prospect for both of the major recruiting ranking composites, will make his decision known at 5:30 PM EST at Nashville Christian School in Tennessee.

He’s down to Georgia and Oregon.

Cox Media property DawgNation.com will be on hand to stream the decision across all of its social media platforms.

Curtis, 18, will have the choice of taking millions of dollars per season from either program, despite the increased scrutiny of payments to college athletes through the proposed House revenue-sharing settlement. He will do so from a combined pool of revenue streams from either school, their respective collections, and also NIL-based endorsements that will have to go through review by a third party.

This decision is so close that DawgNation has learned Curtis’s representatives have prepared two different announcement videos to go in either direction of the decision. It is also likely that his representation won’t know until he makes that decision and then shares one of those two videos across his social media.

The mystery could also extend to both programs. They will learn his choice when he shares his decision first at Nashville Christian and then with the world.

For Georgia, it offers the rare chance at a recommitment. Curtis, who has been prioritized for years, first committed to the Dawgs on March 23 of last year.

He reversed that decision about seven months later. Curtis told DawgNation that he backed off that pledge because it just didn’t feel right needing to visit other schools while still being committed to Georgia.

But there was hope.

“I’m still interested in Georgia as long as they are interested in me,” he said back in October.

Oregon was one of those schools he wanted to check out. Curtis was even quoted last fall as giving Dan Lanning’s Ducks the “leader” tag. There is no perceived leader heading into today’s announcement.

If Curtis chooses Georgia and goes on to enroll early this December, he will be the highest-rated QB signee for the program since Justin Fields in 2018. He’d be the first 5-star QB signee since Brock Vandagriff in 2021.

The national high school rankings for Curtis are also higher than those of former 5-star signees Jacob Eason and Matthew Stafford.

The latest intel swirling around this decision gives no school a clear edge, although there is some guarded optimism in Athens due to familiarity and location. Oregon’s chief pitches are centered around its program being more successful in developing the QB position of late and its offensive prowess.

There was one other factor likely to heavily impact this choice, but an interview with Peter Webb of QB Reps last Friday seems to have changed that perception.

Did you know the weekly DawgNation.com “Before the Hedges” program is available as an Apple podcast? Click to check it out and download it.

Jared Curtis: How much will money matter here?

There’s an ongoing perception that the school with the biggest billfold is going to win out in this recruitment. This is, of course, the NIL era, where there have been many publicized recruitments of late, where 5-star QBs signees have reportedly commanded packages of $2 million to $3 million per season.

Curtis was even given an NIL evaluation by On3.com of $2.7 million.

Webb told DawgNation that neither Georgia nor Oregon was the highest bidder for Curtis. There were other schools, including another SEC school, that had the largest offer. His firm represents NFL Quarterbacks Bo Nix and Riley Leonard and also has numerous clients in college football at Alabama, Clemson, Illinois, Tennessee, and Texas, among other schools.

They’ve represented Curtis dating back to his sophomore year when some trading card and apparel deals came his way. According to Webb, this decision will not simply be a transactional win for the balance sheets and collectives representing each school.

DawgNation has learned neither of these schools was the highest bidder for Curtis.

“It’s pretty simple,” Webb said. “If Jared was chasing the best compensation package, this may have been over a long time ago. These schools may not have even been in the finals. His interest in Georgia and Oregon – and really the difficulty in this decision – has been motivated by the relationships he’s developed during the recruiting process and the unique opportunities both programs provide. We won’t even know what this complete financial framework looks like until after he commits to a university.”

Additionally, Curtis never went to competing programs and set a number for the market.

“We were very clear from the beginning that you want to list out things that are important to you,” Webb said. “You want to look at the location, the campus, the coaching staff. You want to look at the brand, the history of the program, the QB development, the quarterback coach, the offensive coordinator, and the system. You want to look at the QBs that have come through their program and made it to the next level. You want to look at the recruiting classes. Look at the room. Are there some older guys in the room that you could learn from?”

It wouldn’t be a stretch to surmise the NIL piece is less than 15 percent of the overall puzzle here.

“NIL is a part of it, that’s the reality and the opportunity of the landscape right now, but for Jared, it has been a relatively small factor,” said QB Reps marketing director Doug Young. “He knows that getting it done on the field and in the classroom is what’s most important and what will set him up for long-term success. We are proud of Jared for thinking holistically about this decision. It’s a mature approach, and it has been very refreshing to watch it unfold.”

The belief is that Georgia’s bid for the nation’s top QB prospect is competitive with the going rates for QBs nationally over the last few cycles.

What would happen here if one of these two schools came in at the 11th hour with a significantly larger offer? Would that sway the decision? Webb said that wasn’t likely to affect this decision.

Curtis has weighed this as if both schools offered the same financial package. The next step was to consider all the other factors and answer this question: Where will he be the happiest playing college football? He took that to heart.

Have you subscribed to the DawgNation YouTube channel yet? If so, you will see special 1-on-1 content with key 2026 prospects like Tyler Atkinson, Lincoln Keyes, Brady Marchese and Kaiden Prothro.

Why Jared Curtis is wanted by Georgia and Oregon

Curtis, who led his team to the state title game as a freshman, had a massive junior year. He guided his Eagles to a 12-1 record and a runaway 49-21 win in his return to the state championship. The 6-foot-3-plus, 225-pound rising senior raised his completion rate 15 percent in throwing for 2,830 yards, 40 touchdowns, and just three interceptions.

He has elite arm talent, but while he’s just in high school, there are sentences that can be formed that project his ability to spin it with the Josh Allens and Matthew Staffords of the football world.

Aside from his 70 percent completion rate as a junior, the other wrinkle to his game would be his legs. Curtis ran for 637 yards and 18 touchdowns last fall. While he won’t be running away from elite defenders in the SEC or even the Big Ten, he projects to be a serious red-zone weapon.

The 5-star now holds a 62 percent career completion mark while throwing for 7,665 yards, 92 touchdowns, and 19 interceptions at a level that equates to something between Class 1A and Class 2A in Georgia.

He’s been able to make plays with his legs on the regular, running past boxes that he’s either bigger or faster than or both. Curtis has a career average of 6.7 yards per rush attempt. He’s totaled up 1,663 rushing yards and 38 touchdowns.

This decision won’t be the only one for Georgia this month. Or for these two schools. Georgia, Miami, and Oregon are seen as the chief contenders for 5-star OT Jackson Cantwell in Missouri.

Cantwell has sped up his timetable with a decision set for May 13. The nation’s No. 1 OT prospect has also recently scheduled a last-minute visit to UGA set for May 10.

The Bulldogs have never signed the nation’s No. 1 QB and No. 1 OT prospect in the same cycle before under head coach Kirby Smart.

Have you seen this week’s “Before the Hedges” weekly recruiting special on YouTube yet? Check it out below.

SENTELL’S INTEL

(check on the recent reads on Georgia football recruiting)

HUNT VALLEY, Md. (TNND) — It’s been nearly four years since the NCAA enacted a new policy allowing college athletes to profit from their name, image and likeness, and just a few weeks since a federal judge opened the door for college athletic departments to pay athletes directly.

Much of the details are still being worked out in the courts. Key components like roster limits, scholarship limits and payment pools are still up in the air.

As is a governing body to oversee all of these new rules, since most current regulation is a patchwork of state laws, legal settlements and NCAA rules.

But, we are starting to see the impacts of college athletes getting paid – and what it means for the enterprise as a whole.

Depending on who you ask, the historical shift is: long overdue for athletes who’ve spent thousands of hours grinding for their craft; late to the party in terms of global sports; the official death certificate for amateurism and the “student” side of “student-athlete”; or, an inevitable reality that has to run wild before it gets reined in and regulated.

To the league itself, it’s a positive step.

When a judge granted preliminary approval for a framework for schools to pay athletes, NCAA President Charlie Baker said it would “help bring stability and sustainability to college athletics while delivering increased benefits to student athletes for years to come.”

The push for college athletes to get paid spans decades, with legal challenges and legislative efforts dating back to at least the early 2000s. Which is surprising, considering the NCAA has been a multi-million dollar industry for several decades, and a multi-billion dollar industry for about a decade.

That disparity is due to the idea of “amateurism,” a word many experts and analysts use when they cite concerns about completely commercializing college sports. That idea goes back more than a century, to 1800s England, where sports were only for the wealthy, and the working class didn’t want them to be able to pay their way to victory.

“I don’t want to say [amateurism] is going to die, but it will certainly be the commercial aspects that are going to permeate,” said David Hedlund, the chairman of the Division of Sport Management at St. John’s University. “I think we’re going to see and hear less and less about amateurism, and college sports are going to look more like professional sports, or a training ground for professional sports.”

The idea that sports are for enjoyment and the love of the game rather than money is a noble one. And players can love the game and make money off their talents at the same time.

But many experts say amateurism has long been dead; the NCAA was just, for whatever reason, the last organization behind the International Olympic Committee to let it die. It’s part of an effort to keep pace with the rest of the world. Overseas soccer and basketball players are spotted when they’re 12 to 14 years old, and go pro when they turn 18.

“We’re in a global marketplace,” said Matt Winkler, a professor and program director of sports analytics and management at American University. “We sort of have to keep up with the other nations if we want to strive and have those great moments in sports for our Olympic teams and our World Cup teams and so forth.”

Coaches have long been compensated, and universities have long profited off their sports teams.

“The money has always been there. It’s just a lot more front-facing now, I think, than it’s been in the past,” Hedlund said.

Some sports analysts say it was quite front-facing in this year’s NCAA Men’s Basketball Tournament.

March Madness was devoid of any significant upsets or Cinderella teams. For the first time in five decades, every team that made it to the Sweet 16 came from a power conference, including all four No. 1 seeds and all but one No. 2 seed.

And, every team that made it to the Final Four was a No. 1 seed.

ESPN analyst Stephen Smith said NIL deals and the now no-limits transfer portal are to blame for why mid-major programs didn’t see much success, and top-tier schools prevailed.

“If there was no NIL, if there was no portal and you have the mid-majors go 0-6 in the second round, please, we ain’t sweating that,” Smith said. “But when you’re able to point to rules that have been implemented that ultimately shows itself to have inflicted upon the game itself, that’s dangerous.

“College basketball as we knew it – which, to me, is all about March Madness – will cease to exist. Because there’s no madness.”

Experts say there is a serious question mark about the current state of how much colleges can pay to entice players, and how many times players can be enticed enough to transfer.

But not all believe it has to be the death of March Madness or competition in college sports. After all, there’s still Division 2 and 3 universities.

Richard Paulsen, a sports economist and professor at the University of Michigan, said it’s hard to gauge the impact of NIL deals and the transfer portal on competition. Because while the top ten or so power schools may be able to offer the most money to the elite players, there’s still a lot of talent out there.

“The top schools have an advantage in getting the A-level talent, but some of the players that might have sat on the bench at a top school previously could be enticed away with NIL money coming from a second tier school,” Paulsen said. “So I think the impact on competitive balance is maybe a little bit less clear.”

Paulsen says, as a professor, he is worried about the impact NIL deals – particularly million-dollar ones – can have on the students themselves, some 18, 19, 20 years old. It raises the question, does a teenager or young adult need this much money?

Shedeur Sanders is 23 years old, and his NIL valuation at the University of Colorado was roughly $6.5 million. Granted, he’s the son of NFL Hall of Famer and head coach for Colorado Deion Sanders.

But, his 2024 stats were top five in completion percentage, passing touchdowns and yards. Several analysts had him as the top prospect in the 2025 NFL draft, but he slid down to the fifth round, shocking much of the sports world.

Various reports place blame on other reasons – maybe he took more sacks than he should have, maybe NFL executives see traits we can’t see, maybe he bombed interviews with the managers, maybe it had to do with his Hall of Famer dad. And he certainly wouldn’t be the first prospect to get picked later than expected and prove all the teams that passed over him wrong.

But, he’s also losing money by going pro. The iced out, custom “Legendary” chain he wore on Draft Day reportedly cost $1 million.

“It is at least worth noting that five years ago, he wouldn’t have had the online presence that he had, and that could have turned off some NFL teams,” Paulsen said. “Without being in the rooms, I don’t know if it did, but that is possible, and it’s not something that would have been possible even five years ago.”

It begs the question, is it even worth going pro for these top-tier college athletes with insane NIL deals?

In the NBA, new data shows it may not be. The league announced last week just 106 players declared early for the 2025 draft. It’s the fewest since 2015. The number typically hovers around 300.

The drop in early entrants could be lingering effects of the extra COVID year.

But, next year, ten schools will pay their rosters somewhere in the neighborhood of $10 million, including several million dollars per top player. That’s far more than the players would make if they were a second-round draft pick in the NBA.

Winkler said the combination of competitive rosters and the scope of these NIL deals has more to do with this drop in early declarations.

“These deals are getting so big that unless you’re going to be a first round draft choice, maybe if you’re going to be kind of a lottery pick or a top 10, 15 pick, it would be better for you to exhaust your eligibility on a major team, because you’re going to make more,” he said.

So, it might be financially advantageous for athletes to wait on the pros. Some announcers were even suggesting Sanders should go back to college if the NFL didn’t deem him ready for the show. (NCAA rules prohibit him from doing so anyway; he declared for the draft and signed with an agent).

But what about the fact that these players, who become millionaires, are still students?

Schools are working to provide resources for these athletes so they can get advice on what to do with their wealth, so that they don’t spend it irresponsibly. Which is not to assume all of them would; it goes without saying this money could greatly benefit an athlete who grew up in poverty and change the trajectory for his/her family.

But Paulsen says he worries about the “student” side of “student-athlete” when we start talking about millions upon millions of dollars and students transferring to whichever school offers them the most. Sometimes credits don’t transfer; sometimes players could feel pressure to fulfill their NIL commitments over their studies, when the stakes are that high.

At a young age, these players are under an unprecedented amount of pressure, from their coach, from their family, from their financial adviser, from social media, from broadcast exposure, from stakeholders, from the tens of millions of people who can now legally bet on them.

“Players should be able to leave bad situations, absolutely, and I certainly support players’ autonomy and chasing financial benefit from their athletic talents,” Paulsen said. “But if we’re going to call them student athletes, we should have some emphasis on the student part of that too. Some of these rules that are helping the athlete are hurting the student.”

One of those rules, he says, is the transfer portal. But in addition to harming the students’ academic careers, experts say this also takes a toll on teams and fans of those teams.

Take Nico Iamaleava for example. The star quarterback abruptly parted ways with Tennessee over an alleged compensation dispute with the school’s collective. He demanded an NIL readjustment to $4 million to keep playing for the Vols, and when they said no, he transferred to UCLA, though it’s unclear if they met his demands.

The exit shocked his teammates in Knoxville, with one of his receivers and defensive backs, Boo Carter, telling reporters, “He left his brothers behind.”

But the new pay-to-play system does also beg the question of school loyalty, not just for the players, but the fans too.

Paulsen says roster continuity, players spending all four years playing for one team, has been an endearing feature of sports like women’s college basketball, when you look at the legacies, for example, Caitlin Clark built at the University of Iowa, or Paige Bueckers at the University of Connecticut.

“I do think there’s definitely some extent to which all this player movement can have negative consequences,” he said.

But, some experts doubt fans of teams need to see the same or similar team year to year.

After all, this past NCAA Men’s March Madness Championship between Florida and Houston – the one ESPN’s Smith said featured no madness at all – scored 18.1 million viewers on CBS. That’s up 22% from last year’s championship, and the biggest audience since 2019.

The Final Four games, featuring all No. 1 seeds, ranked as the most-watched games in eight years.

In other words, so far, so good when it comes to college sports fandom.

One thing broadly agreed upon among experts is that competition must remain intact. The Florida-Houston matchup was a nailbiter.

“The biggest thing that would kill sports is if there is no competitive balance,” Hedlund said. “It is known when you have a really great team being a not-so-great team, if the great team probably will win, people don’t want to watch.”

People still appear to be watching. If they stop, one could assume the NCAA would change its course, or it’d be out of all its money too.

Plus, these experts expect regulation soon – possible measures like transfer restrictions, collectively bargained salary caps, conference realignment to avoid concentration, turning athletic departments into LLCs, putting degree completion into bylaws and evening out the number of roster spots, among other rules.

Experts say: be patient, wait for the legal fights to run their course, and wait for the brightest minds in sports – and Congress – to come up with a solution that pleases the players, teams, coaches, schools and fans.

“This is fundamental to the success of sports, so we just need to figure out what rules, what regulations, what governing bodies, how do we facilitate this?” Hedlund said. “We don’t want to ruin sports. That’s what’s at stake here.”

Winkler says it all comes down to the most “hardcore” stakeholders: fans and alumni. If the SEC and Big 10 just ganged up and created their own Premier League and college sports turned into checkbook sports, it could threaten that school pride.

“This year, we definitely saw cracks in the system,” Winkler said. “If the best athletes just go to the top, are [fans] rooting for an inferior product? Are they still going to have that affinity for their school, their team, their degrees, and people that are doing it? This is really going to test that.

“[Schools] have two key pressure points: keep getting a lot of money from TV so you can fund your athletic department, and keep alumni, fans and donors still feeling as engagedThere’s a lot to be worked out in the next several months and probably the next year to really get a boiler plate idea of what the rules and regulations need to be.”