WINCHESTER — For 12 years, high school teams through Shenandoah Valley Youth Lacrosse (SVYL), a nonprofit that offers lacrosse programming for area kids starting as young as 2 years old, have played under the “Handley lacrosse” banner.
“We are careful with the trademarks. We don’t call ourselves John Handley High School lacrosse. We always say Handley lacrosse,” said Steven Phillips, who coaches the high school boys’ team. “… We always put lacrosse sticks in an X formation behind the logo when we use the JH logo, and most of my team gear and things like that just say Handley lacrosse.”
But the teams now face losing access to Handley’s name and logo, which advocates say would be detrimental to the program.
As they urge Winchester Public Schools to reconsider the decision, SVYL officials are also pushing for a plan that would reinvigorate what they say was the original goal of forming a varsity lacrosse team made up of solely Handley students.
“We’re so thankful for the years that we have had so far,” said Phillips. “… It’s just, this decision doesn’t make any sense to anybody that’s involved, and we’re obviously pretty upset about it.”
Handley lacrosse was started as a club team in 2014. The Winchester Star previously reported that the school secured two grants from U.S. Lacrosse totaling $11,000 and generated another $30,000 through fundraising to get the program started.
The goal, according to Phillips, was to eventually make lacrosse a varsity sport at Handley.
However, The Winchester Star reported in 2017 that since there was originally only a boys’ club team, going varsity risked violating federal Title IX rules. And while a girls’ club team has since been formed, Phillips indicated that Handley’s current field capacity also poses potential Title IX risks.
“We practice at the lower field at Daniel Morgan [Middle School], which is kind of a rough field, and obviously, track and soccer get the whole bowl complex,” Phillips said.
So for 12 years, the club program continued in what Phillips said he thought was “business as usual,” using the Handley name and logo.
Players largely come from Winchester, Frederick County and Clarke County, an official said recently.
Then last spring, a rule change from the Virginia High School League (VHSL), which governs high school sports in the state, sparked confusion over Handley lacrosse’s future.
The rule was in regard to players playing for multiple-school programs. Phillips said Handley lacrosse officials reached out to VHSL and got clarification that Handley lacrosse is considered a community club team, and therefore the new rule would not impact the program.
“And so we brought that back to them (Winchester Public Schools). They said, ‘Well, we still need to make arrangements for, you know, this agreement to end,’” Phillips said.
Two subsequent meetings were held between WPS and SVYL officials. Then in September, SVYL received a letter from WPS Superintendent Jason Van Heukelum maintaining the division’s request that Handley lacrosse cease using Handley’s name and logo by the end of August 2025.
The teams were offered free field use through August of 2026.
“While I recognize this decision may not be the outcome desired by the local lacrosse community, we believe it is the right choice for Winchester Public Schools and John Handley High School,” the letter reads. “Please be assured that this decision does not reflect any lack of enthusiasm or support for the sport of lacrosse within our broader community.”
In a written statement to The Winchester Star, Van Heukelum said WPS is “committed to successful youth athletic programs and values the opportunities our students have in the division and within the local community.”
“The Shenandoah Valley Lacrosse Club (which oversees SVYL), originally associated with Handley with the intention of building a formal lacrosse program, is now primarily made up of non-City residents,” he continued. “In a recent survey, 15 Handley students out of 1,350 expressed interest in lacrosse. We do not have enough interest to field boys and girls lacrosse teams at JHHS, and it is no longer accurate to allow the Shenandoah Valley Lacrosse Club to use the JHHS name and logo.”
During the most recent lacrosse season, four out of 31 players on the boys’ team were Handley students. On the girls’ team, 6 out of 21 players were Handley students.
“I think it’s also fair to point out that the concentration of a percentage of Handley athletes that play for the for the club team has never really been something that has been discussed,” said Phillips. “It wasn’t a requirement in the past. … [W]e were a little blindsided by the fact that that was a requirement to stay in existence.”
Van Heukelum added in his statement that field space at Handley is currently “extremely limited,” and that the division needs to prioritize Handley teams.
“We have offered use of the Handley field free of charge for SVLC through August 2026 to ensure a smooth transition,” he stated.
In what Phillips described as a “Hail Mary,” a group of lacrosse supporters filled the Winchester School Board’s meeting room during the most recent board meeting, and speakers urged the board to reconsider the change.
Hudson Phillips, a former Handley lacrosse player, said that he transferred from Millbrook High School to Handley in 2021 and that being on the team helped him with a tough transition.
“I knew in the spring I always had two hours out of every day to kind of forget about all that, to be with my friends, to be with people who I knew cared about me. And I made a lot of friends, and I still foster those connections to this day,” he said.
Bo Summers, who currently plays on the team, emphasized that while it is a club team, the players are highly competitive and represent the school’s name well.
“We bring a good team to the name,” he said. “… All we do is compete. We’re guys of grit, guys that have gone through strife, and I think that’s what the Handley lacrosse team represents.”
During the most recent season, the boys’ lacrosse team finished with a 10-2 record, and the girls were undefeated in their eight games. Handley lacrosse largely plays school teams from Northern Virginia.
Garrett Watkins, who coaches the girls’ team, said that, as a former student athlete, he learned important lessons and attributes many of his life’s successes to those experiences.
He also said that his daughter hopes to play lacrosse in college, and that he wants to foster opportunities for her, and other area students, to do so.
Watkins’ daughter, Amelia Cooper, told the board that lacrosse has helped her learn to be a leader and has made her a generally better person.
“[A]fter I started playing for SVYL, I started having dreams of playing in college,” she said. “I wanted to hear the crowd chant when we won. I wanted to walk onto a college field and hear my name announced. I want recruiters to see me play in high school. It’s important to me to play in high school because it’s one step closer to college.”
Speakers also emphasized that the SVYL high school teams don’t require funding from Handley, as nonprofit fundraising covers the costs.
In the interest of offering a solution, Watkins presented a six-year plan for implementing a varsity lacrosse program at Handley. Physical copies were provided to board members.
“When we sat down with the superintendent and the principal and the AD (athletic director), there were some questions that came up. And he, the superintendent, used the word ‘on ramp,’ like, we need an on ramp to get to that varsity goal. And I think they all acknowledge that that was and is a goal, has been the goal,” said Carissa Dueweke, chair of Shenandoah Valley Lacrosse Club. “… So now we’ve got that 1-3-6 plan that Garrett presented in the hopes that the [Winchester] School Board will, maybe, change their mind …”
The plan outlines steps like using cut lists from other sports in Winchester Public Schools to foster interest in lacrosse among middle and high schoolers and offering after-school programming through SVYL for elementary schoolers.
SVYL would cover the costs of the programming for the first five years, during which time lacrosse would, in theory, become more ingrained in WPS.
By year six, the goal would be for Handley to have its own varsity lacrosse teams. Another team would be formed for the non-Handley students who played on the club lacrosse team.
“We’re hoping to, at minimum … get a three-year extension, and get some increased cooperation and efforts around executing on the plan that we laid out,” said Phillips.
There also are thoughts among lacrosse advocates that the land recently purchased by the Handley Board of Trustees to build practice fields could alleviate some of the field usage concerns. Van Heukelum declined to comment when asked about that possibility.
In the meantime, the hope is that the club teams will continue to have access to the Handley name while work toward a varsity program gets underway, as losing name recognition would pose challenges for the program’s future, according to the coaches.
“I would say, over 60% of our games each year come from other high school teams, that that [Handley] name is the only reason they’re playing us,” said Watkins. “The second we lose that name, and they can’t say that they played Handley High School, and they’re saying that they’re playing a club team, it no longer is a benefit to them and their athletics.”
Beyond that, for kids aspiring to play college lacrosse, playing for a club team doesn’t look as strong on applications, Watkins said.
“The next option for us is to rebrand under just a general club name, and that would lead to the loss of the VHSL opponents,” said Phillips. “… We’d basically be starting over everywhere … We lose the brand. We lose, you know, over a decade of hard work and building that brand. So lacrosse is going to take a hit in the area. … [I]t’s going to be a major blow. It’s going to set lacrosse back a decade, and it might even kill it.”
SVYL officials said that they’re hoping to set up a future meeting with Van Heukelum to discuss the 1-3-6 plan. The organization has until Nov. 1 to decide its next move, whether that be continuing on under Handley’s name, moving forward with a new partner or otherwise.
Van Heukelum declined to answer follow-up questions on the matter, deferring to his written statement and the letter issued to SVYL last September.