Connect with us
https://yoursportsnation.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/call-to-1.png

NIL

How Maryland's fastest high school sprinter scored a ground

Elise Cooper will go to the Olympics one day. The fastest high school sprinter in Maryland is one of the most promising racers the state has produced in recent years, setting a national record for the indoor 300-meter dash in February. She’s headed to Texas this fall on scholarship, and her dream of qualifying for […]

Published

on

How Maryland's fastest high school sprinter scored a ground

Elise Cooper will go to the Olympics one day.

The fastest high school sprinter in Maryland is one of the most promising racers the state has produced in recent years, setting a national record for the indoor 300-meter dash in February. She’s headed to Texas this fall on scholarship, and her dream of qualifying for the 2028 Games looms in the distance.

But, in the modern era of sports, with the money that floods the landscape, other goals arrive much faster — faster than a teenager is usually prepared for.

On her 18th birthday, Cooper signed her first name, image and likeness deal with Puma, essentially becoming a pro sprinter for one of the world’s biggest sports apparel companies on her first day of legal adulthood. Even before she signed, the outfitter had sent boxes of gear to her home in Owings Mills — all the free shoes, shorts and sweats the McDonogh School student could have imagined streaming through her door.

The Baltimore Banner thanks its sponsors. Become one.

There was only one catch. Until the company announced the deal, she had to keep one of the most exciting things ever to happen in her career a secret from her closest friends.

For nearly three months this spring, the knowledge burned within her chest. At track practice, her teammates would notice her head-to-toe wardrobe from Puma, sniffing a deal was in the works.

Cooper’s strategy? Deny, deny, deny.

“I was low-key gaslighting them,” Cooper said. “I would just tell them, ‘I like wearing the stuff.’ It was longer than I thought. Way longer.”

In April, Puma finally made public what the Cooper family kept to themselves for what felt like an eon — Cooper was the company’s first high school sprinter signed to an NIL deal, a landmark move in a brand-new market. Only a few years ago, such young athletes would never have been allowed to profit off their athletic careers — and also compete collegiately — in the name of protecting the American curiosity formerly known as “amateurism.”

The Baltimore Banner thanks its sponsors. Become one.

It’s a new day for athletes and their families, who for the first time have the ability to cash in on NIL agreements that pay off years of hard work, even if they’re teenagers in high school. But it’s also a new, potentially treacherous marketplace with few regulations and even fewer experts who can give good advice.

For nearly two years, the Coopers considered various deals from some of the biggest companies in sports, holding out past offers of free gear, of flights to national meets and the prestige of being one of the first high schoolers to get signed.

Danielle Cooper — Elise’s mother, whom she lovingly calls her “mom-ager” — consulted dozens of parents, coaches, lawyers and industry pros in an effort not to get the most profitable deal for her daughter but the one that made the most long-term sense. Even the people she asked knew mostly one corner of the business. Almost no one is evaluating the bigger picture of a rapidly evolving landscape. What is a caring parent to do?

“Basically, no one knows,” Danielle Cooper said. “Even the people you think should know don’t really know. It’s really hard to go on.”

An uncharted economic frontier

It has been less than four years since NIL deals were permitted by the NCAA, a moment that stands as a starting pistol in a race toward economic chaos. Although the new system corrects flaws of the amateurism model by distributing more money into the pockets of the athletes who generate it, the clandestine nature and shadowy rules of the marketplace defy easy understanding for the families caught in the swirl. Especially for Olympic or so-called “non-revenue” sports.

The Baltimore Banner thanks its sponsors. Become one.

Bill Carter, the founder of Student Athlete Insights, hears NIL stories and questions all day long from families who haven’t thought much about the money before. A family of a highly rated lacrosse recruit recently went on a college visit during which an NIL collective offered their child $30,000 to enroll at that university.

The family had been largely considering other factors: academics, coaching staff, the program’s track record. Suddenly, they were ambushed by new questions.

Is $30,000 a good deal? Should we go to other schools and ask what their NIL offers are? Could we negotiate more money? Would that be too pushy?

“They left stunned,” Carter said. “They didn’t know whether it was the deal of a lifetime or an insult.”

While deciding whether to accept tens of thousands of dollars may be a good predicament to face, the families of these elite athletes are increasingly finding themselves in these positions. Markets have stabilized somewhat for Division I football and basketball players, and parents can more easily find what might constitute a fair NIL deal based on the school and the position their child plays.

The Baltimore Banner thanks its sponsors. Become one.

But in track the field of top-flight talent is so small — Carter estimates as little as 0.02% of even NCAA track and field athletes draw significant NIL interest — there isn’t any sort of conventional wisdom for how these deals should work.

Prep track meets are dominated by a few shoe companies, particularly Nike and New Balance, which annually run competing meets they each call “nationals.” Elise is running this weekend in the New Balance Nationals at Penn. She’ll be a top competitor in the 200 and 400 meters — largely because it’s easier to drive to Philadelphia than it is to fly to Eugene, Oregon, where Nike stages its event.

The first NIL deals the Cooper family heard about were stipends, around $1,000 or so, from these companies to cover the cost of travel and lodging for their big meets, drawing elite competition into the field. These are typically accompanied by flattering social media posts and, of course, complimentary gear.

For a teenager, a pair of free shoes is a sweet siren song. Elise figured she should start her strides into the NIL market by taking one of the short-term agreements. Danielle was not as convinced, especially after talking to a family friend who has worked as a sports agent.

“It was my mom who talked to other people and made the decision to hold out,” Elise said. “I kinda wanted stuff now, but I started to understand more after doing more research. NIL’s always evolving, so I’ll never fully understand it.”

The Baltimore Banner thanks its sponsors. Become one.

Confusing by design

The confusion around NIL deals, especially at the high school level, is not by accident. It’s by design.

The Maryland Public Secondary Schools Athletic Association offers a seven-page NIL guidance that has one key rule: When an athlete makes a deal, they cannot be wearing their high school uniform or use content captured from high school competitions. The regulations mainly serve to keep the MPSSAA separate from the economic frenzy.

Carter said that is a common approach by high school associations across the country. They are most concerned with keeping themselves, and their intellectual property, apart from the NIL chase — what he describes as a legal “moat” around the schools. The list of “do-nots” can help the associations, but it rarely offers much help to families.

“The conversations people frequently have around NIL are almost entirely viewed through compliance or almost entirely viewed through seizing the opportunity — but those conversations rarely converge,” Carter said. “It’s so rare they come together, even though that would benefit the athlete the most.”

The way anyone learns anything about NIL is by exhaustively asking around. Not everyone is lucky enough to have Danielle Cooper as a mom or Owings Mills Track Club coach Michael Ray as a supporting resource.

The Baltimore Banner thanks its sponsors. Become one.

Ray and the Coopers made it their mission to get as much guidance as possible. They talked to Quincy Wilson, the Bullis School standout who won a relay gold medal at 16 last year in Paris (he signed with New Balance). They spoke with the Whittaker family, whose daughters Juliette and Isabella both went to the Olympics last year. They spoke to coaches and employees affiliated with brands, trying to figure out what the structure of a fruitful long-term deal would look like.

But even knowing the framework (not necessarily the dollar value, which can be hard to fish for, even among friends) of some of these deals helped only somewhat. In track, value can be extremely subjective, and even more so for a high schooler who, although she has run in the Olympic Trials, has not captured the international success that others with deals already have on their résumés.

“Because it hasn’t become commonplace, you’re really setting the journey that’s brand new,” Ray said. “There’s no standard deal. They might have an idea of what your value might be, you might have a totally different idea, but there’s no template. It’s hard being the first.”

Athletes and their families are not the only ones taking timid steps into the market. The brands themselves have spent the last few years trying to figure out the best way to get in on high schoolers, too.

José (pronounced “yo-say”) van der Veen, Puma’s global head of product line management, ran middle distances in her native Netherlands before going to the University of Texas El Paso in the late 1990s. She had a small regional deal with Puma that she had to give up because of NCAA rules — “I was a little bit bummed at the time,” she said — so she appreciates how quickly the circumstances have changed.

Puma fancies itself a youthful and energetic brand, capitalizing on the colorful personalities of gold medal-winning sprinters like Usain Bolt and Julien Alfred as its spokespeople. While Nike and other brands were quick to jump into exploring high school NIL deals, Puma was more circumspect. There were so many differing state regulations, so few certainties in investing in athletes so young.

“It’s uncharted,” van der Veen said. “For our in-house lawyers, it’s a space we want to be fair and be a little cautious. But the market, that’s where it’s moving to. You obviously have to go there because other brands are going there.”

Elise Cooper was a good candidate for Puma because she’s fast, first and foremost. But it’s also no accident that the brand wanted a candidate with the kind of support system Elise has in her corner.

Her parents were both athletes, and both her sisters are track stars, too (twin sister Elena is heading to Stanford, while older sister Ella competes for Harvard). She’s competed for Owings Mills Track Club under Ray for more than a decade, and Ivy League schools recruited her for her academic prowess before she committed to the Longhorns.

With high school athletes especially, companies want good long-term investments when they bring a teenager into the fold.

“The line to become professional athletes, it’s not linear,” van der Veen said. “Elise seems to have a very good support network around her. If she gets injured, if something happens, she’s smart enough to figure out it won’t define her. … At the highest level, the talent of these athletes eventually becomes pretty similar. It comes down to how mentally tough you can be.”

How a deal came together

The day Elise Cooper set a national record was unusual not because there was some electric feeling in the air leading up to her run — it was the opposite.

Cooper was at The Circuit in Philadelphia on Feb. 28, the day before the meet started in earnest. In the video, there is almost no one in the stands. She was racing against her friend Sydney Sutton from the Bullis School.

Cooper came into the race hoping for a personal record, but she did not imagine smashing Shawnti Jackson’s record by more than three-tenths of a second — a massive gap in the blink-length margins of sprinting.

“I guess I felt fast,” she said. “But I looked at the clock and I was like, ‘Oh my God!’”

Although Cooper prides herself on her ability to perform under pressure, one of her best runs ever came in one of the most low-stakes races of her career. But the days of racing in front of empty stands are numbered, and even more is on the line now that she’s under her first pro contract.

Track deals, maybe even more than those in other sports, are laden with incentives. Athletes get bonuses for reaching PRs, for clocking under certain times, for winning big meets. Although the Coopers did not share all details of Elise’s contract with The Banner, her deal with Puma — as well as future extensions she hopes to sign — have some of these incentives.

The unusual thing about track deals, however, is also the potentially hazardous piece: Sometimes, athletes who get hurt or don’t meet specific goals end up giving money back to their sponsors. Ray has seen it happen with other athletes he’s coached.

There are so many inherent tensions with signing track stars in their teens, it can be hard to decipher what kind of business arrangement makes sense.

“You at least have to look at it with an eye toward the future and what the individual athlete might accomplish,” Ray said. “A good deal in 2025 might not be a good deal in 2026 if you go to college and set the world on fire.”

Trying to be mindful of all of these factors, the Coopers sought a deal with a company that could mature over time. Puma wasn’t the only brand they considered. They liked On Running, a relative upstart from Switzerland founded in 2010, but the company didn’t have as long a track record with sprinters as Puma did. Ultimately, the relationships with the company and the Puma spikes themselves helped seal the Coopers’ decision to sign.

“A lot of people were saying, ‘This is the shoe she’s going to run in if she goes to the Olympics in 2028,’” Danielle said. “So that got in my head, and I was like, ‘Well I really do like On as a brand.’ But then … you’re gonna have to wear that shoe.”

The red carpet treatment from Puma felt particularly special for the Coopers, who traveled to the company’s American headquarters in Boston together. Elise tried out new gear, saw shoes in development that won’t be released for years, and had her feet closely measured for potential custom work down the line.

Puma is a Formula 1 racing sponsor, and Elise (who is a huge fan of F1) could be attending the Grand Prix in Texas in October as a special guest of the brand. A flight to the company’s world headquarters in Germany is sometime in the future.

But with all the perks comes pressure. Danielle has emphasized to Elise that she has to start thinking of track in more serious terms. No late nights cavorting in her friends’ hotel rooms before a big race. Although Elise will wear Nike gear when she competes for Texas under the school apparel deal, she’s contractually obligated to wear Puma at all other events (Ray bought Puma gear for himself as a show of solidarity).

For the previous 10 years, track was Elise’s passion. She still loves it, but now it’s her job.

“I think, when she saw the contract,” Danielle said, “it was when she realized, ‘OK, this is the real deal.’”

Everything on the line

Since she was 7, the sound of the starting gun has always given Elise a jolt.

It’s a little burst of fear that has never fully gone away — a tic that annoyed Elise when her mom pointed it out to me. “OK, first of all, that wasn’t even relevant,” she said, rolling her eyes in Danielle’s direction.

Danielle dotes on her daughters, and while Elise sometimes teases that the parenting style can feel over the top — Danielle has a running gag that she will buy an RV next year to drive to her daughters’ various meets — she ultimately embraces her mom’s dedication to her career. On her notes app on her phone, there’s a long to-do list of things she wants Danielle to accomplish.

“Not even halfway finished,” Elise playfully jabbed. “Wow, look at that.”

As much as she can push back on her mom’s devotion, she deeply appreciates the fact she probably would have never landed the deal with Puma without that level of diligence. Having a parent who can do this much legwork is a luxury not every athlete has.

Carter said the one piece of advice he would give every family trying to navigate the NIL market is to have patience. If a deal is on the table, there’s a good chance it will stay there for weeks or months. He estimated 90% of the regrets he hears from people are that they pounced too quickly.

“I would tell anyone to slow down and think about the ramifications of it before you sign it,” he said. “Spend a little bit of time thinking about who might help you: an attorney, someone to review the contract, a financial adviser. Get their input, and move through the process slowly.”

The market could help athletes and families by stabilizing and adding regulation. As the NCAA moves into revenue sharing, there’s a sense that NIL will become less important to the overall economics of sports — and companies would welcome some corralling from the Wild West the space is now.

It reminds van der Veen of the chaos in the late 2010s when “super spikes” hit racing and led to records all over getting slashed. Over the next few years, regulating bodies stepped in, other companies caught up and the field evened out again. She hopes the forces overseeing NIL in the NCAA and high schools have a similar flattening effect soon.

“I know the coaches are getting together right now, saying, ‘Hey, we really need to protect these Olympic sports,’” she said. “I really think, in the next couple of months, you’ll see pushback against the rules, more regulation of it. It will get more established and clearer.”

But it’s also likely that elite track athletes like Elise Cooper will always be a kind of outlier, that there may never be one template for the best deal or partnership that makes the most sense or carries the least risk. There may be less than a dozen high schoolers in any given year with the talent to attract contracts from big companies, and their families will always have steep learning curves in the short window that such deals are available.

What helps the Coopers is how independent Elise is when it comes to the races. She warms up and prepares on her own, mentally envisioning the race — tamping down her quickening pulse as she awaits that sharp bang of the starting gun that has never quite lost its intimidating bite.

“The difference between her and other athletes for me is she’s always able to get race ready on her own,” Danielle said. “She’s never needed me for the race. She’s always been independent in her preparation.”

There’s more on the line now than ever for Cooper, an axiom for her career from here until (at least) she shoots for Olympic gold in 2028. But the list of goals she has are all about her PRs — not about her salary, college or world titles or even earning all the free shoes in the world.

That’s why those around Elise see the Puma contract not as the conclusion to a saga but merely another step. That’s what everyone is hoping for.

“You see when the kids get serious about it and what that means for the sacrifices they make for themselves,” Ray said. “Usually the motivator is something beyond money. They really want to be the best of the best.

“Elise,” he added, “is one of those people.”

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

NIL

College Football Leaders React to Trump’s NIL Order

Shutterstock Donald Trump is jumping into the college sports NIL debate with both feet, planning to sign an executive order that would create nationwide standards for how athletes can profit from their name, image, and likeness. The move caught many college sports insiders off guard — even those who’ve been talking with Trump about these […]

Published

on





Donald Trump is jumping into the college sports NIL debate with both feet, planning to sign an executive order that would create nationwide standards for how athletes can profit from their name, image, and likeness. The move caught many college sports insiders off guard — even those who’ve been talking with Trump about these very issues.

Texas Tech booster Cody Campbell, who’s been having regular conversations with Trump this summer about stabilizing college athletics, admitted to USA Today he “hadn’t heard anything” about the executive order specifically. But he wasn’t totally surprised by Trump’s decision to take action.

This push comes while members of Congress are working on their own solution. The SCORE Act (Student Compensation and Opportunity through Rights and Endorsements) was recently introduced in the House, aiming to create federal standards that would replace the current messy patchwork of state laws governing player compensation.

Trump’s administration had previously considered creating a college sports commission, but they’ve put those plans on hold for now.

The timing is interesting.

SEC Commissioner Greg Sankey, who recently met with Trump at his Bedminster golf club alongside Notre Dame Athletic Director Pete Bevacqua, shared his thoughts on the situation during an ESPN interview this week.

“It’s not a secret, I had a chance to visit with the President,” Sankey told ESPN Wednesday. “We met and played golf at Bedminster, and his interest is real. My takeaway: he wants to be supportive of college athletics, make sure that it’s sustainable, the Olympic program and the Olympic development.”

Sankey added that Trump seemed particularly concerned about women’s athletics and establishing “real boundaries” for NIL. Despite their conversations, Sankey admitted he didn’t have “inside reports” about what prompted Trump’s sudden executive order announcement.

The commissioner emphasized that congressional action remains “a real priority” for college sports leaders, noting he’d spoken with lawmakers just yesterday about the House bill that recently cleared a subcommittee.

This isn’t the first time college football figures have gotten involved in the political process. Earlier this year, South Carolina head coach Shane Beamer testified before a House subcommittee on these very issues. Former Alabama coaching legend Nick Saban has also repeatedly called for regulatory changes to the current NIL system.

With both Congress and now the executive branch looking to tackle NIL rules, college sports could be heading for its biggest regulatory shakeup in decades.

5 Rookies Already Turning Heads in NFL Preseason Camps

5 Rookies Already Turning Heads in NFL Preseason Camps



Link

Continue Reading

NIL

Women’s basketball stars’ name, likeness and image brands carrying over into the WNBA

Caitlin Clark, Angel Reese and Paige Bueckers are part of the new generation of women’s basketball stars who have been able to profit off their name in college and build brands that have helped them excel off the court in the WNBA. All three players had national star power before stepping foot in the pros. […]

Published

on


Caitlin Clark, Angel Reese and Paige Bueckers are part of the new generation of women’s basketball stars who have been able to profit off their name in college and build brands that have helped them excel off the court in the WNBA.

All three players had national star power before stepping foot in the pros. Clark and Reese have made the All-Star Game in each of their first two seasons and are two of the most popular players in the league.

Bueckers was voted a starter in her first All-Star Game this weekend.

The next group up in college that is led by Hannah Hidalgo, Flau’jae Johnson, Olivia Miles and JuJu Watkins has already benefitted from the name, likeness and image. According to On3, Johnson’s NIL valuation is $1.5 million.

“NIL, man, it is beautiful,” Johnson said. “This year in March Madness, I had about five commercials running and you know it was so cool watching the game, then seeing myself come on. It’s just a great opportunity.”

Johnson is a guard at LSU, one of the top schools for NIL in a variety of sports from football to women’s gymnastics to women’s basketball. Johnson, who also has a music career, has gained from the exposure the school has given her, doing national media campaigns with Experian and Powerade.

Hildago, who will be entering her junior year at Notre Dame, is happy that players can finally profit off their own images as opposed to the school getting it all.

“It’s a blessing. Schools for decades have been able to make money off of college players’ names. So for now, for student athletes to be able to make money off of how they carry themselves, you know, we’re a brand ourselves,” she said. “I’m a brand myself and so be able to make money off of my name is honestly truly a blessing and just taking advantage of it is the biggest thing.”

Johnson, Hidalgo and Miles, who helped the U.S. qualify for the World Cup next year by winning gold at the AmeriCup earlier this month, all said that they don’t let the NIL deals they have get in the way of their sport. They credit having a strong support system around them as well as people who handle the deals for them.

“I really dedicate one or two times a week to kind of get all my stuff done,” Miles said. “My agent is very good at scheduling that, but most of my money comes from the collective deal, so for that I really don’t have to do much, which is nice. But any other of the other side deals, my agent will send a videographer out to help me or have her edit stuff or whatever it may be.”

Getting deals and earning money hasn’t just helped the players financially. Some have given back to their communities, including Johnson.

“I just want to be one of those people that uses NIL the right way,” she said. “This year I did a campaign with Experian and we relieved $5 million in debt right for families in Louisiana and then every game we won we added $100,000 to the pot.”

Johnson said it was really touching and emotional when she would receive videos on Instagram from people she helped.

“I’m really using my platform for impact for real. So I think that’s the best part of NIL and just making it better for the young girls that’s coming behind us,” she said.



Link

Continue Reading

NIL

NIL brands carry over into WNBA

Caitlin Clark, Angel Reese and Paige Bueckers are part of the new generation of women’s basketball stars who have been able to profit off their name in college and build brands that have helped them excel off the court in the WNBA. All three players had national star power before stepping foot in the pros. […]

Published

on


Caitlin Clark, Angel Reese and Paige Bueckers are part of the new generation of women’s basketball stars who have been able to profit off their name in college and build brands that have helped them excel off the court in the WNBA.

All three players had national star power before stepping foot in the pros. Clark and Reese have made the All-Star Game in each of their first two seasons and are two of the most popular players in the league.

Bueckers was voted a starter in her first All-Star Game this weekend.

The next group up in college that is led by Hannah Hidalgo, Flau’jae Johnson, Olivia Miles and JuJu Watkins has already benefited from the name, likeness and image. According to On3, Johnson’s NIL valuation is $1.5 million.

“NIL, man, it is beautiful,” Johnson said. “This year in March Madness, I had about five commercials running and you know it was so cool watching the game, then seeing myself come on. It’s just a great opportunity.”

Johnson is a guard at LSU, one of the top schools for NIL in a variety of sports from football to women’s gymnastics to women’s basketball. Johnson, who also has a music career, has gained from the exposure the school has given her, doing national media campaigns with Experian and Powerade.

Hildago, who will be entering her junior year at Notre Dame, is happy that players can finally profit off their own images as opposed to the school getting it all.

“It’s a blessing. Schools for decades have been able to make money off of college players’ names. So for now, for student athletes to be able to make money off of how they carry themselves, you know, we’re a brand ourselves,” she said. “I’m a brand myself and so be able to make money off of my name is honestly truly a blessing and just taking advantage of it is the biggest thing.”

Johnson, Hidalgo and Miles, who helped the U.S. qualify for the World Cup next year by winning gold at the AmeriCup earlier this month, all said that they don’t let the NIL deals they have get in the way of their sport. They credit having a strong support system around them as well as people who handle the deals for them.

“I really dedicate one or two times a week to kind of get all my stuff done,” Miles said. “My agent is very good at scheduling that, but most of my money comes from the collective deal, so for that I really don’t have to do much, which is nice. But any other of the other side deals, my agent will send a videographer out to help me or have her edit stuff or whatever it may be.”

Getting deals and earning money hasn’t just helped the players financially. Some have given back to their communities, including Johnson.

“I just want to be one of those people that uses NIL the right way,” she said. “This year I did a campaign with Experian and we relieved $5 million in debt right for families in Louisiana and then every game we won we added $100,000 to the pot.”

Johnson said it was really touching and emotional when she would receive videos on Instagram from people she helped.

“I’m really using my platform for impact for real. So I think that’s the best part of NIL and just making it better for the young girls that’s coming behind us,” she said.

FILE - USC guard JuJu Watkins (12) plays against Purdue during the first half of an NCAA college basketball game in West Lafayette, Ind., Wednesday, Jan. 22, 2025. (AP Photo/Michael Conroy, File)
FILE – USC guard JuJu Watkins (12) plays against Purdue during the first half of an NCAA college basketball game in West Lafayette, Ind., Wednesday, Jan. 22, 2025. (AP Photo/Michael Conroy, File)
FILE - Guard Olivia Miles dribbles up court during practice at USA Basketball women's Americup trials, Wednesday, June 18, 2025, at the USA Olympics training center in Colorado Springs, Colo. (AP Photo/David Zalubowski, File)
FILE – Guard Olivia Miles dribbles up court during practice at USA Basketball women’s Americup trials, Wednesday, June 18, 2025, at the USA Olympics training center in Colorado Springs, Colo. (AP Photo/David Zalubowski, File)
FILE - Guard Hannah Hidalgo during practice at USA Basketball women's Americup trials, Wednesday, June 18, 2025, at the USA Olympics training center in Colorado Springs, Colo. (AP Photo/David Zalubowski, File)
FILE – Guard Hannah Hidalgo during practice at USA Basketball women’s Americup trials, Wednesday, June 18, 2025, at the USA Olympics training center in Colorado Springs, Colo. (AP Photo/David Zalubowski, File)



Link

Continue Reading

NIL

Georgia Bulldogs not on list of the 10 biggest spenders in CFB

On3 released a survey by writer Pete Nakos listing the top 10 biggest spenders in college football this season, which takes a look at the combined amount of money spent on incoming recruits and transfers. Surprisingly, Georgia was not on the list. Kirby Smart has expressed negative opinions about the way the transfer portal and […]

Published

on


On3 released a survey by writer Pete Nakos listing the top 10 biggest spenders in college football this season, which takes a look at the combined amount of money spent on incoming recruits and transfers. Surprisingly, Georgia was not on the list.

Kirby Smart has expressed negative opinions about the way the transfer portal and the NIL are going. He called out college collectives for making payments of up to $20,000/month for a recruit to commit and stay at a school, and he is worried that college teams could “buy championships” now.

As a result, Smart and the Georgia Bulldogs are more careful with how they spend their NIL money. The Bulldogs have earned praise for how they spend their NIL money, but money was a big factor in Georgia losing five-star offensive tackle recruit Jackson Cantwell to Miami in May.

Georgia also just lost out on five-star linebacker recruit Tyler Atkinson to Texas, who is college football’s biggest spender. The Longhorns also flipped five-star defensive lineman James Johnson from Georgia too.

Three other SEC teams (Texas A&M, Tennessee, Auburn) made the list. Texas A&M currently has the No. 3 recruiting class in the nation for 2026. The Aggies also signed the No. 10 recruiting class and No. 11 transfer class in 2025.

Auburn had the No. 8 recruiting class and transfer class in 2025, even though in 2026, the Tigers have the No. 78 class.

Tennessee is a surprising addition. The Volunteers’ class is ranked No. 13, but last year’s transfer class ranked No. 81 in the league, and they lost starting quarterback Nico Iamaleava to UCLA via the spring transfer portal.

There are four Big Ten teams (Ohio State, Oregon, Michigan, USC) that make the list, along with one ACC school (Miami) and one Big 12 school (Texas Tech). Georgia added the No. 2 recruiting class in the 2026 cycle, so it is impressive that the Bulldogs did it without being one of the biggest spenders.

Biggest spenders in college football this season

  1. Texas Longhorns
  2. Texas Tech Red Raiders
  3. Ohio State Buckeyes
  4. Oregon Ducks
  5. Texas A&M Aggies
  6. Miami Hurricanes
  7. USC Trojans
  8. Michigan Wolverines
  9. Tennessee Volunteers
  10. Auburn Tigers

Follow UGAWire on Instagram or Threads for more UGA football coverage!





Link

Continue Reading

NIL

Pat Kelsey reveals ugly truth behind Louisville and Kentucky’s worst game date ever

Louisville basketball’s non-conference schedule is expected to be one of the most thrilling schedules in all of college basketball. Kelsey’s statement schedule is proving to the selection committee that Louisville is not “ducking the smoke” and is playing the best of the best, including their in-state rivals, the Kentucky Wildcats. The Cardinals and Wildcats’ blockbuster […]

Published

on


Louisville basketball’s non-conference schedule is expected to be one of the most thrilling schedules in all of college basketball. Kelsey’s statement schedule is proving to the selection committee that Louisville is not “ducking the smoke” and is playing the best of the best, including their in-state rivals, the Kentucky Wildcats.

The Cardinals and Wildcats’ blockbuster showdown caused mayhem for the fans of both programs, as well as for college basketball fans in general. The rivalry matchup is expected to be one of the best games next season, as both programs have National Title dreams and aspirations.

However, the game is one of the first on the schedule, as it will take place on Nov. 11 at KFC Yum! Center. The fans were outraged when the date was initially announced, and Kelsey has just revealed the painful reality behind Louisville and Kentucky scheduling the rivalry game on the worst date imaginable.

Related: Louisville basketball schedules Kentucky rivalry game on worst date imaginable

Pat Kelsey reveals the painful reality behind Louisville and Kentucky’s rivalry game date

The Cardinals and Wildcats are set to play at KFC Yum! Center on a Tuesday night in early November. College basketball fans were dreaming of this game later in the week in mid-December, with a lot more on the line and the teams gelling together.

However, fans got the game on Nov. 11, making it the earliest this game has ever been played, and in fact, the basketball game will take place before the Governor’s Cup is played on the football field. The basketball game will tip off 18 days before the football game at L&N Stadium, which suggests that this date is the absolute worst possible choice.

This rivalry showdown has been played 57 times, and this year’s date doesn’t mark the earliest the rivalry showdown has taken place, shattering the previous record by 15 days. Before the Nov. 11 date, the earliest these two teams played was on Nov. 26 back in 1983.

Kelsey was asked about the rivalry game date, and he just revealed the painful truth of what happened and how the two programs agreed on November 11.

“Scheduling is hard,” Kelsey stated at his press conference Wednesday morning. “It’s like putting a square peg in a round hole sometimes. When you are setting up dates with a program, they have dates, you have dates that work, and you are going back and forth, and the one that we were able to land on is that one. That is just the way it goes.”

The rivalry showdown, being that early in the season, is one thing, but the worst part is that it’s happening this season, the year when both programs are legitimate National Championship contenders. Louisville has the tenth-best odds, and Kentucky has the fifth-best odds to win the 2025-26 National Title. These two programs and their fan bases hate each other, and it was fitting for a game in December. However, Kelsey’s answer is painfully acceptable, as both schools are trying to put together a National Championship schedule, making it hard to agree on dates.

This game will kick off the season with a massive bang and serve as a significant recruiting pitch to 5-star recruits. The Louisville and Kentucky rivalry showdown is set to feature many future NBA All-Stars in this year’s matchup, and while fans may have wanted this game later in the season, it is time to accept the date and move forward.

Related: Louisville basketball’s Mikel Brown Jr. has Kentucky fans admitting the hype is real

For all the latest on Louisville basketball’s offseason and recruiting, stay tuned.



Link

Continue Reading

NIL

Why Deion Sanders’ Salary-Cap Proposal Wouldn’t Fix College Football

For all the pandemonium and commotion he has produced in a few short years, Deion Sanders is plenty sensible. He’s thoughtful. And he’s certainly never shy. At a time when the sport is large on issues and short on fixes, Colorado’s head football coach has an idea. Although the fix is imperfect, easily manipulated and […]

Published

on


For all the pandemonium and commotion he has produced in a few short years, Deion Sanders is plenty sensible. He’s thoughtful. And he’s certainly never shy.

At a time when the sport is large on issues and short on fixes, Colorado’s head football coach has an idea. Although the fix is imperfect, easily manipulated and short of what college football needs—and we’ll get to that—it’s worth celebrating a coach who’s willing to offer up a solution on the heels of criticism.

In the era of the transfer portal and NIL, the premise of Sanders’ remedy is simple: College football needs a salary cap.

“I wish there was a cap,” Sanders said while speaking to reporters at Big 12 media days (via ESPN). “Like, the top-of-the-line player makes this, and if you’re not that type of guy, you know you’re not going to make that. That’s what the NFL does.”

Sanders, of course, has never been reluctant to speak his mind. He’s also taken full advantage of the transfer portal and NIL at Colorado since he arrived. Despite having less resources than other schools, Sanders has utilized his persona to masterfully resurrect a roster that needed fixing.

Still, things are much different now than when he arrived before the 2023 season. While Sanders has shown the ability to thrive in an unstable environment, he’s keenly aware of how certain programs will carry an even larger advantage moving forward.

Big 12 Football Pro Day

“You understand darn near why they’re in the playoffs,” Sanders said about some teams having an easier path to the postseason due to resources. “It’s kind of hard to compete with somebody who’s giving $25-30 million to a freshman class. It’s crazy.”

None of what Sanders is saying is wrong. The way college football has implemented its new era of financial compensation—from NIL to direct revenue sharing to the transfer portal—has been nothing short of a colossal failure rife with manipulation.

The NCAA’s unwillingness to embrace change sooner, coupled with a flurry of legal rulings, have forced teams to act in their best interests without guardrails. The ultra-competitive landscape has essentially transformed the way teams operate, starting with talent acquisition first and foremost.

It’s an utter mess. Sanders is right about that. But to assume a salary cap would solve these woes is where the idea quickly loses steam.

A noble idea? Sure, even if the outcome is undeniably personal.

A realistic idea? Presently, not at all.

Limits on revenue sharing are loosely in place, as schools can now spend a maximum of roughly $20.5 million directly on student-athletes. The sport is at least trying to curtail some of the madness. With that being said, the existence of NIL (albeit in its newly mutated form) along with the possibility of paying players the good old-fashioned way—under the table with no paper trail whatsoever—still persists.

New rules have brought these handshake agreements out in the open, but the practice is by no means forgotten. A salary cap of any kind would simply generate new off-the-radar ways to convince players to play for a specific team or coach.

Oklahoma State v Colorado

For proof of this practice, look at how recruiting played out over the past few decades. In the end, programs with more resources will still find more ways to utilize them.

Such has been the case for college football for as long as it has existed in this form. Such will be the case as it continues to operate in this financial era, whether the contributions are reported or not.

In many ways, Sanders is the greatest counter to this movement. His stardom is so robust and his reputation so large that high schoolers will choose to play for him, even if it means taking a pay cut of some kind.

In this era, Sanders is the ultimate equalizer. But even he recognizes that there are limits to his gifts—that his presence can only do so much.

His suggestion, in many senses, comes from a source of frustration. Given his situation, it’s not hard to see why. It also doesn’t mean he’s necessarily wrong.

If all things were considered equal, he would have a point. But the sport is too far gone to think a simple salary cap could solve it. The schools and their many tentacles will find a way, whether it’s widely recognized or not.

Things are not equal, and they won’t be equal moving forward, either.

More structure is needed. More leadership is necessary. More guidance would only help a sport that desperately needs it. But a salary cap won’t suddenly shift the landscape; decades of results tell us just that.

In many respects, college football’s problems run far deeper.



Link

Continue Reading

Most Viewed Posts

Trending