Connect with us

College Sports

Kenny Dillingham's five secrets for a winning college football team

ASU coach Kenny Dillingham embodies the energy and vision that helped transformed the Sun Devils from 3–9 to College Football Playoff contenders. (Photo by Anthony Chiu/Cronkite News) PHOENIX – Two years ago, Arizona State football was in the middle of its worst two-year stretch – winning percentage wise – in program history. ASU fired head […]

Published

on

ASU coach Kenny Dillingham embodies the energy and vision that helped transformed the Sun Devils from 3–9 to College Football Playoff contenders. (Photo by Anthony Chiu/Cronkite News)

PHOENIX – Two years ago, Arizona State football was in the middle of its worst two-year stretch – winning percentage wise – in program history. ASU fired head coach Herm Edwards midseason after an embarrassing loss to Eastern Michigan, the Sun Devils finished the season 3-9 and the university was in the middle of a recruiting scandal.

ASU searched for a new coach at a time when the football program wasn’t much more than a laughing stock. Who would want that job?

Kenny Dillingham, and his ability to turn the program into a national powerhouse in record time came thanks to five key ingredients: strong relationships, proper strength and conditioning, full player effort, talent and psychological flexibility.

The early years

The Arizona native grew up loving ASU. The Chaparral High School alum played football until he tore his ACL his senior year and began coaching with the junior varsity team.

Dillingham coached the varsity quarterbacks at Chaparral for five years under coach Charlie Ragle before he was promoted to offensive coordinator in 2013.

“I saw an ambitious young man who had a fire, was extremely bright – components that are going to give you an opportunity to be successful in any endeavors in life,” Ragle said. “He wasn’t scared to speak up. Once he really got going, you saw his dedication and work ethic.”

After a year as OC at Chaparral, Dillingham became an offensive assistant under offensive coordinator and assistant head coach Mike Norvell at ASU. Two years later, Norvell took the head coaching job at Memphis and Dillingham followed, as a graduate assistant. During Dilligham’s three years at Memphis, he rose from a grad assistant to a quarterbacks and tight ends coach to the offensive coordinator while still working with the quarterbacks.

“You can sit there as a coach; you can have all the desires, all the dreams of what you want it to be, but you have to go make it happen. I never gave Kenny anything. He earned all that he ever got,” Norvell said. “You embrace opportunity. There’s plenty of people that desire for more, but aren’t always willing to do what it takes to gain more.

“Whatever your role and responsibility is, you have to approach every day as if you’re the next – as if you’re already living the promotion of what you desire and what you want to be. You have to do a great job in the tasks that you have, but if you put that type of ownership in it, then you’ll be ready for what’s ahead.”

In 2019, Dillingham took the offensive coordinator and quarterback’s coach position at Auburn under Gus Malzahn, where he met Bo Nix. After a year, Dillingham reconnected with Norvell at Florida State in the same position. The offensive guru turned heads with his development of FSU quarterback Jordan Travis, who spent two seasons with Dillingham before he led the Seminoles to a 13-0 regular season in 2023.

“I thought Kenny did a great job of helping Jordan realize potential things that he could do to help him walk through some of those challenging moments where maybe even Jordan doubted himself,” Norvell said. “They formed a great relationship and he continued to help Jordan take the positive steps, which eventually he continued on and became one of the best players in college football.”

After two seasons with Norvell at FSU, Dillingham reunited with Nix at Oregon. In 2022, Nix threw for more than 3,500 yards, rushed for more than 500 yards and accounted for 42 total touchdowns under Dillingham’s leadership.

Running back Cam Skattebo was the engine of ASU’s offense in 2024, racking up 1,735 rushing yards, 605 receiving yards, and 25 total touchdowns. (Photo by Dani Trujillo/Cronkite News)

A year later, Dillingham jumped at the opportunity to be a head coach. Not only was it his first head coaching opportunity, but it came at his favorite university – the ultimate dream job.

“This is literally home. So, I say that because this place is special. This state is special. The people in this room are special. I’m going to be fired up to be here, fired up to be a Sun Devil,” Dillingham said in his introductory press conference. “I am all in. That’s my family right there up front, pretty cool. When you talk about a person, and a family that’s rooted here, that’s me, right? This is my dream job.”

In his first season, mulled by pending NCAA sanctions and a self-imposed bowl ban from ASU’s recruiting scandal by the previous regime and mountains of injuries, ASU finished 3-9 for the second straight year. Dillingham talked about trusting the process and success taking time. But, by the performance on the field, there wasn’t much belief.

In 2024, Dillingham and ASU took the college football world by storm and shocked the country. The story has been told many times. ASU was picked to finish last in its new Big 12 conference, its season win total set at four and a half, and nobody believed the Sun Devils would look much better than the two previous 3-9 seasons – except Dillingham and the players in his locker room.

“Nobody believes in you, you should have a little bit of a chip on your shoulder from that perspective. But, great teams are not built off of what the media’s perception of them is,” Dillingham said before ASU’s 2024 opener. “Great teams are built because they’re wired in a way to just get better throughout the process every single day, and that’s what we’ve been focused on.”

We don’t need to highlight each moment throughout the season because everyone knows what happened next. Dillingham and Co. proved every doubter wrong. ASU finished 11-3, which was its best finish since 1996, when Bruce Snyder took the program to the Rose Bowl. The Sun Devils made the College Football Playoffs for the first time in school history, and took the Texas Longhorns to double overtime in the Peach Bowl.

It’s safe to say, any college football fan across the country knew about Dillingham and ASU football by the end of the first week of 2025.

Quarterback Sam Leavitt received arly 2025 Heisman hype. Receiver Jordyn Tyson’s stock rose to become one of the best receivers in the country, and running back Cam Skattebo had many believing he was the best back in the country.

Leavitt threw for nearly 3,000 yards, 24 touchdowns and ran for an additional 612 yards. Tyson reeled in 1,101 yards and 10 touchdowns in just 12 games, and Skattebo collected 1,735 rush yards, 605 receiving yards and 25 total touchdowns.

With Skattebo’s departure to the NFL, there are many skeptics of whether ASU can build on the success from 2024 or if it was just a one-off. However, Leavitt is only a redshirt sophomore, Tyson’s a redshirt junior, and the Sun Devils have many returners on the defensive side along with a deep running back room.

Every coach has a recipe for success, and finding the right ingredients to implement it is the key to being the next college football powerhouse.

What are the essentials to a successful football team and how has Dillingham implemented them at ASU?

(Graphic by Douglas Santo/Cronkite News)

Trust between players and coaches

Former ASU women’s basketball coach and Phoenix Mercury assistant coach Charli Turner Thorne would say, “People don’t care about what you know until they know you care.” Turner Thorne is the winningest women’s basketball coach in ASU history, and this simple, yet powerful message was the basis of the trust built between the coach and her players.

From the court to the grass, Dillingham leads with a similar coaching philosophy.

“If you know your players, you can coach them better. If you understand their why, if you understand how they think, you understand how to motivate them,” Dillingham said. “You understand when they’re down. You understand when they’re up. So, if you don’t know your player, you’re going to be limited in terms of how you can coach them.”

Dillingham arrived in Tempe when all hell broke loose, but he had a vision. He knew his vision wouldn’t happen overnight, but he had faith in a plan to bring joy and love for college football back to the Valley.

The first step was to build a culture at ASU that could rejuvenate the Sun Devils, create a sense of pride and bring excitement to the team once again, and that started with him. However, that constant energy and focus started way before his time at ASU.

“First time I ever really got a chance to be around him on a football field, he was the (offensive coordinator) at Chaparral. He’d come over and spend a lot of time talking ball during our spring practice,” Norvell said. “(He was) very attentive; you could sense the desire he had to be a great coach and a person of influence within his staff, within his football team and the relationships he had with his players. That was something that stood out to me. His energy was infectious.”

Dillingham’s willingness to be himself and show courage has always been evident, from his time at Chaparral with Ragle, Memphis and FSU with Norvell, Auburn with Gus Malzahn, to ASU.

“I got a chance to sit in the quarterback room and just watch him, and you could tell his positive energy … he was different than most. He’s a real positive guy, positive thinker,” Malzahn said. “He had courage to give his opinion in big moments, which is rare for a young guy. There’s not a lot of guys like him.”

Dillingham’s courage, undeniable energy and authenticity to be himself around his players helped build trust at a time when all trust had been lost. Malzahn, a national champion with almost 35 years of coaching experience, said college football is hard. There’s a lot of ups and downs that come with success.

The relationships built within a team are what carry players through those ups and downs, and that’s what DIllingham has worked to create within the Sun Devils. He’s a relationship builder, and that’s what players need.

“More than anything, it’s the relationships that Coach Dillingham has created with the players. In order to have success, you have to have clear and concise communication. I think he’s built a bridge of trust with the players, and they know that their voice matters,” Ragle said. “I think the consistency with that, and the communication between the players and the coaches, and especially the head coach who runs the programs; that has been pivotal in our success, especially from year one to year two.”

ASU’s jump from three wins to 11 wins in Dillingham’s second season exceeded even the highest of expectations. The basis of that success grew from the trust planted in the relationships Dillingham and his staff built with their players.

“Nobody’s going to give you an effort or listen to what you have to say unless they know you actually care about them, and you want them to do well and want them to do better. People want to know that you care about them,” Marsit said. “They want to know that you’re capable of explaining why things happen and get down to the deeper meaning of stuff. Those athletes, you talk to them, they really and truly understand that those coaches care about them.

“They care about them as people. They care about them as human beings. They’re not just cogs in a machine to play football. When you feel that way, you’re willing to do stuff, you’re willing to sacrifice more, to work harder and do what you’re being asked to do, if you believe that there’s something bigger forward.”

Proper strength and conditioning

Coming off a historic season, Arizona State gears up during spring practice with eyes set on sustaining success and proving 2024 was just the beginning. (Photo by Emma Jeanson/Cronkite News)

Strength and conditioning is the backbone of an athlete’s control over their potential. Every athlete wants to get better, faster and stronger so they can be the best possible version of themself in whatever sport they partake in.

However, doing so correctly is extremely important. The practice of strength and conditioning has transitioned from less heavy, constant training, to a more controlled, precise, goal-oriented method, according to Marsit, who oversees the Bachelor of Science in Sports Science and Performance Programming at ASU.

“I think the time of just the rah rah, ‘powerlifter, go-lift-heavy coach is really kind of coming to an end, and now it is much more of a science based field that requires you to really have some intricate knowledge of what’s going on,” Marsit said. “We train human beings, not robots, and there’s this kind of misbelief that you just keep doing more and you just get better, and that’s how it works. The reality is, your body is just constantly cycling through being broken down and then building itself back up.”

Marsit is a seasoned expert in sports science and strength in conditioning. The ASU teaching professor earned his bachelor’s degree in exercise science from Pennsylvania State University, and his master’s degree in exercise physiology from Appalachian State University. Marsit is a certified strength and conditioning specialist, and was the associate head strength and conditioning coach at ASU before teaching.

“The key to training is understanding there are times you push really hard and you break people down, but then after you do that, you have to back off and allow them to recover, rebuild and get better, and have that recovery.” Marsit said. “If you just constantly kind of beat them into the ground, that’s all you’re doing, is just beating them into the ground, and eventually they’re going to suffer from overtraining symptoms.

“You’re going to see a breakdown in muscle tissue. You’re going to see some negative reactions, people are going to get burned out. At a deep molecular level, we are actually changing the muscle. When we over train it, it just can’t fire off anymore. It doesn’t have the ability to do so.”

This is the basis of periodization training. It’s training at different levels of intensity over a period of time to reach maximum potential. Many times this type of training is used in competition events so an athlete can perform at its highest level on a certain day or window of days.

But, this training strategy can be used in regular training as well for consistent growth without overdoing it. Muscle growth is the breaking down of muscle tissue so it can grow back stronger. But if time isn’t allowed for the muscle tissue to grow back, it just continues to wear down.

This becomes particularly important for college athletes because they don’t have the resources professional athletes have in the recovery process. They may not have a private chef or hyperbaric chamber at home.

“Periodization is just about how you plan an exercise routine to make sure that you’re allowing for sufficient recoveries; enough light to heavy days of training, so that everything kind of comes up in balance. These are students. They’re going to school every day,” Marsit said. “So trying to balance out their training with that is really important, and it’s a much more delicate balance than say the professional athlete who does have access to all kinds of stuff for recovery.

“A college athlete, you have what you have. So you have to put much more importance on making sure their training variation matches what their body’s capable of doing, so that they don’t hurt themselves.”

Technology developments have given coaches and athletes a huge step up in this category. There’s numerous tools now that can measure athletes’ acceleration, their power production when lifting, speed of the bar movements, repetitions and the bar’s path during workouts.

These advancements allow for teams to be more precise with their training regiments, and have a closer eye of athletes safety during workouts.

“We really have a much tighter control on what they’re capable of doing, when we could push, when we need to back off,” Marsit said. “Then finding their way to their genetic potential much sooner than we ever could before.”

Dr. David Udelf, a clinical and sports psychologist, has an acronym, REP, for success in athletes’ strength and conditioning training. Udelf earned his Doctor of Psychology degree from the University of Denver, and has over 40 years of coaching experience.

Udelf said to make every rep count, you need to have the correct rhythm, execution and precision, and this goes for training and in-game situations across sports.

“You need to be precise. In order to be precise, you need to execute it correctly. In order to execute it effectively, you need to have the right rhythm,” Udelf said. “When you rush, you jump offsides. Baseball players; they rush their swing.”

Full effort from players

ASU defensive back Javan Robinson, center, leads a talented and deep defensive unit poised to be a driving force for the Sun Devils again in 2025. (Photo by Spencer Barnes/Cronkite News)

A coach’s ability to get full effort from their players starts with the first two ingredients: trust and proper training. Players aren’t going to give everything they have unless they trust their coach, have that relationship and have the proper training support.

“They have to know that you have their best interest at heart. They need to know when you ask for 100 percent effort, like you actually need it, and you mean it at this time,” Marsit said. “And then you’re also going to protect them and back off at other times.”

All these aspects work together to coincide with each other, and it’s up to a coach to make their athletes feel comfortable, heard and motivated.

“Every workout is not going to be (about seeing) if we can make people throw up. It’s a balance, and if you can build that trust and rapport with your athletes … give them some ownership over their body and their program, but also build the faith they have in you to do the right things, you really are going to build a really successful program and relationship,” Marsit said.
Dillingham and his staff have built relationships with their players and gained trust to get the best effort from the Sun Devils when asked. That respect has been developed through leadership by example.

“They’ve got to see it from you. It’s the willingness to be the example. A willingness to really put yourself out there as a coach … what it is that you desire, but also what you’re willing to pour into them,” Norvell said. “Everybody can talk about what they want it to look like, but are you willing to put that on display for an 18 to 22 year old?

“Are you willing to take ownership? Are you willing to be vulnerable? Are you willing to pour it all in for them to see it put on display and hopefully inspire them to do that in their own right in their own career.”

This leadership by example is demonstrated in practice every day. Senior defensive end Elijah O’Neal said Dillingham’s energy is contagious, and there’s not a lot of coaches in college football like him.

“He’s very energetic, man. That energy just converts to its players and helps them have the same juice,” O’Neal said. “If you’re juiceless, you’re useless. So when you get on this practice field, you have to bring that juice because the coaches are and they’re going to know if you’re draining the juice or if you’re adding to it.”

Although there may not be certain statistics a coach can look at for those levels of measurement, the eye test and players’ presence goes a long way.

How many workouts are people missing? How much time are they away from the team? Is the full team staying all summer and buying into the program to get ready for the season? Are they showing up for voluntary workouts? There are many other ways than simple statistics coaches can monitor to determine their players’ effort levels.

“From a strength and conditioning standpoint, that’s the metrics you look at. How many people are trying to get out of the workouts versus how many people are actually showing up and doing the job,” Marsit said. “That tells you a lot about whether a team buys into what they’re doing.”

However, with the advancements in technology of weight training devices, coaches can monitor effort metrics in a more precise method as well. Technology now allows them to track the efforts of athletes in individual lifts and workouts.

This goes a long way in player and team accountability. When Marsit was a strength and conditioning coach, the coaches would put metrics up on the board on competition days for everyone to see to make sure everyone gave max effort. Overall, this information gives players and coaches more to study and analyze to optimize performance.

“You can really hold people accountable who are not giving you a full effort, and compare it to what they did the day before, the week before,” Marsit said.

Good players

ASU quarterback Sam Leavitt, who threw for nearly 3,000 yards last season, enters the upcoming college football season with early 2025 Heisman hype. (Photo by Spencer Barnes/Cronkite News)

The fourth ingredient to a successful football team is recruiting good players: talented players and high-character players that fit the culture of the team. Success makes recruiting more talented players easier, but Ragle said the Sun Devils aren’t quite there yet.

This seems very simple, and it is. But simple concepts aren’t always easy to make a reality.

“I think we’re still working to get the very best players that we can get. We haven’t arrived by any stretch. We had one good year,” Ragle said. “You can’t just let talent override character. You can have a bunch of talent, and if they don’t have any guidance or leadership from within – and I’m not talking about the coaches, I’m talking about the players – and they don’t have a moral compass that tells them, ‘Hey, we have to do right, and this is not right.’

“You’ll just be a talent pool gone astray. So the biggest thing, (Dillingham) has been very diligent about that – finding the right guys that we feel have the right mix of talent with the right values that we want here at Arizona State.”

The Sun Devils 2024 run was sensational, and it was propelled by the right guys being on the field. But, once you get those good players into the locker room and onto the field, Norvell believes to maintain that success a coach needs to have belief in their players and together they can work toward a common goal of winning, achieving success.

“I’d like to see myself as a, ‘You can,’ coach. Try to surround myself with people that I believe in all the things that they can achieve, and I try to hold them to the standard of what I know they’re capable of,” Norvell said. “Everyday we get the choice for what we’re willing to pour into the opportunities that we have. I’m just trying to help paint that picture and hold guys accountable to the standard of all that I know they can be.”

Norvell, a coach with nearly 20 years of experience, won four different Coach of the Year awards in 2023, including the Paul “Bear” Bryant Award. The FSU coach believes by surrounding yourself with people you believe in and carry high expectations for, it results in good players.

When you combine belief in an individual with shared goals and values, the effort level to achieve success heightens. The consistent effort each day builds up to be ready for when the big moment comes.

“It’s about finding like-minded individuals that believe in a common cause, that are willing to do the things necessary to put themselves in a position to achieve success, and everybody wants to be successful,” Norvell said. “Everybody desires to win in the moment. But are you willing to do the things that it takes to be prepared for your moment? Whether it’s one play, one game, whatever that might be throughout the course of the season.

“You have to earn that. You have to earn it throughout your preparation, and really the sacrifices that you’re willing to make throughout the course of your career to be able to answer the call when your moment arises.”

Psychological flexibility

ASU coach Kenny Dillingham’s success is rooted in the trust and relationships that have become the foundation of ASU’s program culture. (Photo by Brendon Pricco/Cronkite News)

Psychological flexibility is the ability to pursue valued goals despite the presence of distress. The final ingredient to a successful football team is the ability to demonstrate psychological flexibility. A successful team needs players who can demonstrate the ability to bounce back from mistakes and pivot from internal conflict.

“Keep the main thing, the main thing. Stay focused and remember what you’re here for, and like why you even want to play football in the first place,” junior running back Kanye Udoh said, who transferred to ASU from Army this offseason.

Udelf would say, “Get out of your head and get into the game.” Players need the mental ability to play free on the field despite any outside noise or personal stresses.

“Athletes have to be able to be not only flexible to dealing with stuff that goes on – they have to be able to move on. There’s a lot of mind chatter going on, a lot of things going on in the mind, and you have to deal with it instead of dwelling on that stuff,” Dr. Udelf said. “You have to be able to put your attention on what you’re doing. For example, if a quarterback throws an interception, he has to be able to bounce back.”

An athletes’ ability to move on from mistakes is crucial to their psychological flexibility and mental stability. Another aspect is their ability to stay calm under pressure and not lash out.

In the military, they use a phrase: Calm is contagious. When working in high stress environments, the leader needs to be calm and composed so it translates to the rest of the unit. The same can be applied to athletics.

This doesn’t mean the energy needs to be stripped away from leaders on a football team. But, in critical situations throughout a game, or a season, a leader’s ability to stay calm and collected to deliver radiates through the team.

This can also translate to the ups and downs of a season and focus level. Udelf was a reporter at an NFL game in September 2014, when Justin Tucker nailed a 32-yard field goal as time expired for the Baltimore Ravens to beat the Cleveland Browns, allowing the Ravens to eventually make the playoffs that season.

When Udelf entered the locker room, there wasn’t much celebration happening. So, he asked Ravens defensive end Chris Canty why. Canty told him there was celebration right when they entered, but these are professional athletes, and they’re getting ready for the next game now.

There’s always room for celebration of accomplishments and exciting events, but psychological flexibility is about continuing toward end goals despite the presence of those good or bad distractions.

The success ASU attained last season was unprecedented, and it wouldn’t have been accomplished without the presence of trust and relationships, proper strength and conditioning, full effort from players, good players and psychological flexibility.

To sustain that success going forward, each player needs to be hungrier to achieve even more, which is a challenge for everyone in this day in age of college football.

Norvell’s Seminoles went 13-1 and finished ranked No. 5 in the college football playoffs in 2023. FSU was ranked No. 10 in the 2024 preseason Top 25. The Seminoles lost nine of their first 10 games and finished 2-10 in 2025. The world of college sports is so unpredictable and losing that edge and want for growth can derail success.

That’s the challenge Dillingham and ASU will face in 2025, finding the desperation for improvement and not becoming complacent.

“Even for us this last year … there’s plenty of distractions in this world and things that can work to keep you from what is best. It’s a desperation for improvement, a desperation for growth, and capitalizing on the potential that you have,” Norvell said. “You can’t get caught up in your momentary result. You can’t let your circumstances define you. You have to be able to push and be able to give everything you have to showcase all that you are, with a constant mindset of improvement.”

College Sports

Bayport-Blue Point senior athletes commit to NCAA Division III colleges

Sixteen student-athletes from Bayport-Blue Point High School have committed to play their respective sports at NCAA Division III colleges next year. The seniors were recognized by the district for their achievements during a recent signing ceremony. The group represents a range of sports, including lacrosse, baseball, basketball, football, ice hockey, softball, soccer and gymnastics. Their […]

Published

on


Sixteen student-athletes from Bayport-Blue Point High School have committed to play their respective sports at NCAA Division III colleges next year.

The seniors were recognized by the district for their achievements during a recent signing ceremony.

The group represents a range of sports, including lacrosse, baseball, basketball, football, ice hockey, softball, soccer and gymnastics. Their college destinations span the Northeast, with several heading to SUNY campuses and others committing to such private institutions as Colby College, Johnson & Wales University and St. Olaf College.

Among the committed athletes are Dylan Craig and Ryan Athearn, who will both play lacrosse at SUNY Cortland, and Declan Cameron, Kenny Vatalaro and Eamonn Ford, who are set to join SUNY Maritime College’s lacrosse program.

Other commitments include Kelly Graf to SUNY Geneseo for softball, Lola Kiesel to Utica University for gymnastics and baseball player Brady Gelling to St. Olaf College.

In the photo above…

Bayport-Blue Point student-athletes celebrate their NCAA Division III college commitments.

Standing, from left: Dylan Craig (lacrosse, SUNY Cortland), Cormac Love (basketball, U.S. Coast Guard Academy), Brady Gelling (baseball, St. Olaf College), Mike Messina (baseball, Johnson & Wales University), Ryan Bachmore (football, Colby College), Evan Waldbauer (basketball, St. John Fisher University), Guy Kiesel (baseball, SUNY Maritime College), Andrew Snyder (ice hockey, St. John’s University), and Ryan Athearn (lacrosse, SUNY Cortland).

Seated, from left: Declan Cameron (lacrosse, SUNY Maritime College), Kelly Graf (softball, SUNY Geneseo), Kaelyn Walsh (soccer, Suffolk County Community College), Lola Kiesel (gymnastics, Utica University), Sophia Constantino (soccer, Marymount University), Kenny Vatalaro (lacrosse, SUNY Maritime College), and Eamonn Ford (lacrosse, SUNY Maritime College).

The photo is courtesy of Bayport-Blue Point schools.



Link

Continue Reading

College Sports

Canada shocked by Denmark in major upset at men’s hockey World Championship

Team Canada was eliminated in the quarterfinals of the World Championship in stunning fashion Thursday thanks to a dramatic 2-1 comeback victory for Denmark. Canada, led by the duo of NHL superstars Sidney Crosby and Nathan MacKinnon, had rolled through the tournament, suffering only a shootout loss to Finland while easily handling the field. The […]

Published

on


Team Canada was eliminated in the quarterfinals of the World Championship in stunning fashion Thursday thanks to a dramatic 2-1 comeback victory for Denmark.

Canada, led by the duo of NHL superstars Sidney Crosby and Nathan MacKinnon, had rolled through the tournament, suffering only a shootout loss to Finland while easily handling the field.

The Canadians, however, shockingly met their match in the quarterfinals.

Most of the game was a scoreless tie featuring a goaltending duel between Canada’s Jordan Binnington and Denmark’s Frederik Dichow.

Order seemed to be restored five minutes into the third period as Crosby set up Travis Sanheim for the game’s initial goal and a 1-0 Canada lead.

Canada held that lead until Denmark’s Nikolaj Ehlers scored with 2:17 remaining in regulation to even the score. Ehlers’ shot from the left point came with Denmark’s goaltender pulled.

The score didn’t stay tied for long.

Nick Olesen scored what will go down as one of the most memorable goals in Denmark’s hockey history when he banged a rebound past Binnington for the winner.

Dichow was the game’s star, stopping 39 of Canada’s 40 shots to backstop the major upset.

Canada outshot Denmark 40-33.

While Canada wasn’t showcasing its Olympic roster, its team still featured the likes of Crosby, MacKinnon and the very impressive Macklin Celebrini, not to mention Binnington, who led Canada to victory in the 4 Nations Face-Off in February.

This also officially concludes Marc-André Fleury’s hockey career. He was Binnington’s backup in this game and confirmed last week that this tournament will mark the end of his career.

(Photo of Dean Evason and the Canada bench: Bo Amstrup / Getty Images)





Link

Continue Reading

College Sports

The Daily Collegian 2024-25 diversity report | Penn State, State College News

The Daily Collegian is committed to understanding and amplifying the voices of underrepresented communities. We strive to be inclusive both in our newsroom and external coverage. Regardless of possible institutional changes to programs at Penn State or federal orders affecting DEI programs, the Collegian remains committed to upholding our values. The Daily Collegian’s Diversity, Equity […]

Published

on


The Daily Collegian is committed to understanding and amplifying the voices of underrepresented communities. We strive to be inclusive both in our newsroom and external coverage. Regardless of possible institutional changes to programs at Penn State or federal orders affecting DEI programs, the Collegian remains committed to upholding our values.

The Daily Collegian’s Diversity, Equity and Inclusion Committee, established in 2024, created this inaugural diversity report to increase transparency, identify areas of growth and implement improvements within our staff.

The committee conducted an anonymous, self-reported survey each semester during the 2024–25 academic year. During the summer, 56 of 88 staff members responded to the survey. In the fall, 142 of 217 staff members responded to the survey, while 177 of 260 responded in the spring.

After reviewing the survey results, the Collegian invites community feedback on how we can improve both our internal practices and our coverage of the Penn State and State College communities. Please click here for the form.

Here are the results of the survey.

Race and ethnicity at The Daily Collegian

Of the summer staff responses, 46 individuals self-reported as white, seven as Hispanic or Latino, five as Black or African American, three as Asian and one as North African or Middle Eastern.

In the fall, 108 staff members identified as white, followed by 19 as Hispanic or Latino, 18 as Asian and nine as Black or African American. Two individuals identified as North African or Middle Eastern and one as Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander.

Five individuals used the “Other” category to share additional identities, including Jewish, South Asian, Brazilian and Syrian, Indigenous and Italian.

In the spring, the number of white-identifying staff members rose to 139. Hispanic or Latino representation increased to 28 individuals, while 19 identified as Asian. Two more individuals identified as Black or African American compared to the fall, bringing the total to 11. Four individuals identified as North African or Middle Eastern, doubling the count from the previous semester.

No staff members selected the Native American identifier in any of the semesters.

One person did not respond to this question in both the summer and spring semesters; all respondents answered in the fall.

Several individuals identified with multiple races and ethnicities across all semesters. There were seven international students in the fall and nine in the spring, but none on summer staff.

According to student enrollment data from Penn State’s Office of Planning, Research and Assessment, 58.8% of students at University Park identify as white, 14.8% are international students, 8.8% are Hispanic or Latino, 7.1% are Asian, 4.3% are Black or African American, 3.8% identify as two or more races, 2.3% are listed as race and ethnicity unknown, 0.1% identify as American Indian or Alaska Native and 0.1% as Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander.

When compared to University Park’s overall student demographics, our staff composition showed a higher percentage of white-identifying individuals and fewer international, Hispanic or Latino and Black or African American members.

Languages at the Daily Collegian

Each respondent reported proficiency in English. The number of Spanish-speaking staff increased from seven in the summer to 20 in the fall, and 21 in the spring. In the spring survey, four individuals reported proficiency in Mandarin and three in Portuguese. Three individuals also spoke French. Additionally, three people reported speaking both Hindi and Gujarati.

Other languages spoken included Albanian, American Sign Language, Arabic, Bahasa Malaysia, Greek, Hebrew, Igbo, Italian, Japanese, Marathi and Turkish.

Gender identity at the Daily Collegian

In our summer survey, gender identity options included male, female, non-binary and other. 64.3% identified as female and 35.7% as male, with no one selecting non-binary or specifying another gender identity.

After receiving committee feedback and distributing the fall survey, we updated the gender identity options mid-cycle to include: man, woman, non-binary, transgender and genderfluid. Prior to this change, we received 15 responses identifying as male and 14 as female.

By the end of the fall, 78 individuals identified as female, 33 as male, one as non-binary and one as transgender.

In the spring, 108 individuals identified as women, 66 as men, four as transgender and one as genderqueer. One person did not respond to this question in the spring.

The majority of individuals used either he/him or she/her pronouns. In both the summer and spring, one individual used she/they pronouns. In the fall and spring, one person used they/she pronouns, and in the spring, another used they/he pronouns.

According to student enrollment data from Penn State’s Office of Planning, Research and Assessment, 53% of students identify as men and 46% as women. The remaining 1% identify with another gender identity, including 365 students who identified as nonbinary, 182 as transgender, 108 as genderqueer and 81 as gender nonconforming, among others.

While the total number of transgender and gender-diverse individuals on our spring staff was smaller than in the overall Penn State population, our staff had proportionally greater representation of these identities relative to sample size, with 2.2% identifying as transgender and 0.6% as genderqueer — compared to a combined 1% of university students who identified with a range of gender-diverse identities, including transgender and genderqueer.

Disability at the Daily Collegian

The Daily Collegian’s fall and spring totals of individuals identifying with a disability or chronic condition were the same, with 18 in each semester. One person did not answer this question in the spring.

In the summer, nine individuals identified with a disability or chronic condition, which represented the highest percentage across all semesters at 16.1%.

Sexual orientation at the Daily Collegian

Across all three semesters, the majority of staff self-reported as straight, with 43 in the summer, 112 in the fall and 136 in the spring. Bisexual was the second-most reported sexual orientation, with numbers increasing each semester — from five in the summer to 13 in the fall and 16 in the spring.

Between the summer and spring, the number of individuals who identified as gay increased from one to five; lesbian, from one to seven; queer, from zero to four and pansexual, from one to three.

Across the three semesters, eight individuals selected the “prefer not to say” option. One person identified as demi-sexual in the fall, one as asexual in the spring and another reported “no label” in the summer.

Three people did not answer the question in the summer, four did not answer in the fall and two did not answer in the spring.

Academic Colleges at the Daily Collegian

As expected, the majority of staff members came from the Donald P. Bellisario College of Communications. The College of the Liberal Arts ranked second each semester, growing from 28 members in the fall to 46 in the spring.

The Smeal College of Business followed as the next most-represented college, with 15 members in the spring. The only academic college not represented among staff was the Ross and Carol Nese College of Nursing.

One individual was a graduate student during the spring semester.

Some staff members were enrolled in more than one academic college.

Leadership at the Daily Collegian

Diversity in leadership is of utmost importance to The Daily Collegian.

While the poll includes input from both the business and news divisions of the Collegian, it’s worth noting that response rates were low on the business division, with four out of 11 directors responding in the summer, two out of 11 in the fall and four out of 10 in the spring.

A majority of Collegian editors on the news division responded to the poll. All but one responded in both the summer and fall, and three out of 19 did not respond in the spring.

In the summer, three members self-identified as people of color — two from the news division and one from the business division. That number rose to six in the fall and remained the same in the spring,

Two leaders identified as having a disability or chronic condition in both the summer and spring, and three did so in the fall.

The number of leaders who identified as part of the LGBTQ+ community increased each semester — from two in the summer to three in the fall, and six in the spring.

There were two leaders from non-Bellisario colleges in the summer and three in the fall, but none in the spring.

Candidacy at the Daily Collegian

Our semester-by-semester results have given us a clearer picture of where we’ve grown, starting with efforts to attract a diverse range of candidates.

The DEI Committee was tasked with several recruitment initiatives aimed at drawing applicants from a variety of backgrounds, academic colleges and identities.

Thirteen candidates responded to the summer poll, six of whom identified as people of color. That number increased to 22 out of 54 respondents in the fall. In the spring, 11 out of 30 candidates self-identified as people of color.

Three candidates identified as having a disability or chronic condition in the summer. That number rose to six in the fall, then declined to four in the spring.

Four candidates identified as members of the LGBTQ+ community in the summer, 11 in the fall and five in the spring.

Only one candidate in the summer came from outside the College of Communications. That number rose to 17 in the fall and 11 in the spring.

Additional notes

With the news division making up the majority of the staff, the committee separated survey results by division to better analyze trends.

In the spring, 42 respondents identified as people of color, 31 were non-Bellisario students, 23 identified as LGBTQ+ and 11 identified as having a disability or chronic condition. Each of these figures represented an increase from the fall and summer semesters.

The business division saw its highest response rate in the fall, with 33 responses. That semester, eight respondents identified as people of color, four as LGBTQ+, five as having a disability or chronic condition and 12 as non-Bellisario students.

All of these figures decreased in the spring, except for the number of non-Bellisario respondents.

As previously mentioned, the committee implemented several initiatives to diversify the Collegian and improve transparency with the community. In addition to the survey, an audit of the Collegian’s visual content was conducted to identify areas for growth in photo and graphic representation.

The committee also continued work on improving the Collegian’s source tracker to help ensure more inclusive coverage of underrepresented communities.

The summer survey was not anonymous, although names were optional. Based on related feedback, names were removed from subsequent surveys, and both the fall and spring surveys were made fully anonymous.

To protect staff privacy, specific position titles have been removed from this report. Going forward, the committee does not plan to collect or report staff position data in future surveys.

This inaugural report, developed under the leadership of 2024–25 DEI Chair Avery Hill, serves as a prototype that will be expanded and refined in future iterations.

For any additional comments, suggestions or concerns, please contact the 2025–26 DEI Chair, Chayil Dozier, at ccd5350@psu.edu.

MORE COLLEGIAN NEWS


The Daily Collegian receives grant from American Press Institute for influencer collaboration

The Daily Collegian was selected as one of 16 news organizations nationwide to receive a gra…

If you’re interested in submitting a Letter to the Editor, click here.



Link

Continue Reading

College Sports

Lynn Wolf Named 2025 Educator of the Year by MassCPAs

“Lynn’s effectiveness in the classroom is unparalleled. Her ability to engage and inspire students is evident from the overwhelming popularity she enjoys among the student body. Her rigorous teaching methods, combined with her approachable manner, enable students to grasp complex concepts while being genuinely challenged to expand their knowledge and skills.   One of Lynn’s […]

Published

on


“Lynn’s effectiveness in the classroom is unparalleled. Her ability to engage and inspire students is evident from the overwhelming popularity she enjoys among the student body. Her rigorous teaching methods, combined with her approachable manner, enable students to grasp complex concepts while being genuinely challenged to expand their knowledge and skills.  

One of Lynn’s most notable contributions is her redesign of Bentley’s introductory financial accounting course. Her innovative curriculum has not only made accounting concepts more relatable but has significantly enhanced student engagement. This redesign is credited with a remarkable 40% increase in our Accounting majors over just a few years, a testament to Lynn’s impactful teaching and curriculum development.  

Furthermore, Lynn’s collegiality and support extend beyond her students; she is a pillar of strength for her peers, always ready to assist, advise and collaborate. Her contributions to our academic community are invaluable, and her dedication to education and student success is evident in every aspect of her work.”

Pictured: Wolf, a devoted fan of Bentley’s men’s ice hockey team, hoists the Atlantic Hockey Association (AHA) Championship cup following the team’s historic win earlier this year.  



Link

Continue Reading

College Sports

2025 NCAA baseball bracket: Men’s College World Series scores, schedule

The 2025 NCAA Division I baseball tournament is the final NCAA championship of the academic year. It begins with a 64-team field competing in regionals, then moves to 16 teams at super regionals and, lastly, an eight-team field playing in the 77th Men’s College World Series in Omaha, Nebraska, from June 13 to June 22/23.  […]

Published

on


The 2025 NCAA Division I baseball tournament is the final NCAA championship of the academic year. It begins with a 64-team field competing in regionals, then moves to 16 teams at super regionals and, lastly, an eight-team field playing in the 77th Men’s College World Series in Omaha, Nebraska, from June 13 to June 22/23. 

The MCWS will feature two double-elimination brackets with the two winners meeting in a best-of-three championship series.

The tournament bracket will be announced during the selection show at 12 p.m. ET on Monday, May 26 on ESPN2 or ESPNU.

👉 Click here to see which teams receive automatic bids as conference tournament champions

⚾️ MORE BASEBALL ⚾️

Below, you can find all the information about the 2025 NCAA DI men’s tournament — regional, super regional and Men’s College World Series. 

2025 NCAA DI baseball tournament bracket

Here is a blank version of the eight-team bracket for this year’s tournament:

MCWS 2025 Bracket

👉 Click or tap here for the interactive 2025 bracket 

2025 NCAA DI baseball tournament schedule  

  • Selection show: Monday, May 26 at 12 p.m. ET (tentative)| ESPN2 or ESPNU 
  • Regionals: Friday-Monday, May 30-June 2
  • Super Regionals: Friday-Monday, June 6-9
  • First day of MCWS games: Starts Friday, June 13
  • MCWS finals: Saturday – Sunday/Monday, June 21-22/23

How to get tickets for the Men’s College World Series

The Men’s College World Series will be played at Charles Schwab Field Omaha in Omaha, NE. You can find all the ticket info for the 2025 MCWS here.

Baseball Championship: Future dates

Year REGIONALS SUPER REGIONALS MCWS
2026 May 29 – June 1 June 5 – 8 June 12 – 21/22
2027 June 4 – 7 June 11 – 14 June 18 – 27/28
2028 June 2 – 5 June 9 – 12 June 16 – 25/26
2029 June 1 – 4 June 8 – 11 June 15 – 24/25
2030 May 31 – June 3 June 7 – 10 June 14 – 23/24

MCWS HISTORY: Winningest coaches | Most titles | Most appearances 

Here is more on how the tournament works:

What is the difference between the Division I baseball tournament and the College World Series?

The NCAA DI baseball tournament is a 64-team tournament that starts in late May. After two rounds of play (which each consist of multiple games), there are just eight teams left. These eight teams then head to Omaha, NE. for the College World Series. The CWS is the culmination of the DI tournament, where the teams compete in two brackets, with the winners of each meeting in the CWS finals, a best-of-three series to decide the NCAA champion.

When did the College World Series start?

The first-ever NCAA DI baseball tournament was in 1947, and would barely be recognized as the same tournament nowadays. The 1947 tournament featured just eight teams, which were divided into two four-team, single-elimination brackets. The two winners — California and Yale — then met in a best-of-three final in Kalamazoo, MI. California would go undefeated through the inaugural CWS and beat Yale to capture the first title.

How are teams selected for the NCAA Division I baseball tournament?

Since 1954, the NCAA DI baseball tournament field has been split into two qualifying groups: the automatic berths, and the at-large selections. Since 2025, 29 conference champions receive automatic berths, and 35 teams receive at-large bids, decided by the NCAA DI Baseball Committee.

Additional information: More on how the Men’s College World Series works

Men’s College World Series championship history

Below is a complete list of all the College World Series finals in the 76-year history of the event. Tennessee won the 2024 Men’s College World Series in three games over SEC conference foe Texas A&M.

The Volunteers became the first No. 1 overall seed to win the Men’s College World Series since Miami (Fla.) in 1999.

YEAR CHAMPION (RECORD) COACH WINNING SCORE RUNNER-UP SITE
2024 Tennessee (60-13) Tony Vitello 6-5 Texas A&M Omaha, Neb.
2023 LSU (54-17) Jay Johnson 18-4 Florida Omaha, Neb.
2022 Ole Miss (42-23) Mike Bianco 4-2 Oklahoma Omaha, Neb.
2021 Mississippi State (50-18) Chris Lemonis 9-0 Vanderbilt Omaha, Neb.
2020 Canceled due to Covid-19
2019 Vanderbilt (59-12) Tim Corbin 8-2 Michigan Omaha, Neb.
2018 Oregon State (55-12-1) Pat Casey 5-0 Arkansas Omaha, Neb.
2017 Florida (52-19) Kevin O’Sullivan 6-1 LSU Omaha, Neb.
2016 Coastal Carolina (55-18) Gary Gilmore 4-3 Arizona Omaha, Neb.
2015 Virginia (44-24) Brian O’Connor 4-2 Vanderbilt Omaha, Neb.
2014 Vanderbilt (51-21) Tim Corbin 3-2 Virginia Omaha, Neb.
2013 * UCLA (49-17) John Savage 8-0 Mississippi State Omaha, Neb.
2012 * Arizona (48-17) Andy Lopez 4-1 South Carolina Omaha, Neb.
2011 * South Carolina (55-14) Ray Tanner 5-2 Florida Omaha, Neb.
2010 South Carolina (54-16) Ray Tanner 2-1 (11 inn.) UCLA Omaha, Neb.
2009 LSU (56-17) Paul Mainieri 11-4 Texas Omaha, Neb.
2008 Fresno State (47-31) Mike Batesole 6-1 Georgia Omaha, Neb.
2007 * Oregon State (49-18) Pat Casey 9-3 North Carolina Omaha, Neb.
2006 Oregon State (50-16) Pat Casey 3-2 North Carolina Omaha, Neb.
2005 * Texas (56-16) Augie Garrido 6-2 Florida Omaha, Neb.
2004 Cal St. Fullerton (47-22) George Horton 3-2 Texas Omaha, Neb.
2003 Rice (58-12) Wayne Graham 14-2 Stanford Omaha, Neb.
2002 * Texas (57-15) Augie Garrido 12-6 South Carolina Omaha, Neb.
2001 * Miami (Fla.) (53-12) Jim Morris 12-1 Stanford Omaha, Neb.
2000 * LSU (52-17) Skip Bertman 6-5 Stanford Omaha, Neb.
1999 * Miami (Fla.) (50-13) Jim Morris 6-5 Florida State Omaha, Neb.
1998 Southern California (49-17) Mike Gillespie 21-14 Arizona State Omaha, Neb.
1997 * LSU (57-13) Skip Bertman 13-6 Alabama Omaha, Neb.
1996 * LSU (52-15) Skip Bertman 9-8 Miami (Fla.) Omaha, Neb.
1995 * Cal St. Fullerton (57-9) Augie Garrido 11-5 Southern California Omaha, Neb.
1994 * Oklahoma (50-17) Larry Cochell 13-5 Georgia Tech Omaha, Neb.
1993 LSU (53-17-1) Skip Bertman 8-0 Wichita State Omaha, Neb.
1992 * Pepperdine (48-11-1) Andy Lopez 3-2 Cal St. Fullerton Omaha, Neb.
1991 * LSU (55-18) Skip Bertman 6-3 Wichita State Omaha, Neb.
1990 Georgia (52-19) Steve Webber 2-1 Oklahoma State Omaha, Neb.
1989 Wichita State (68-16) Gene Stephenson 5-3 Texas Omaha, Neb.
1988 Stanford (46-23) Mark Marquess 9-4 Arizona State Omaha, Neb.
1987 Stanford (53-17) Mark Marquess 9-5 Oklahoma State Omaha, Neb.
1986 Arizona (49-19) Jerry Kindall 10-2 Florida State Omaha, Neb.
1985 Miami (Fla.) (64-16) Ron Fraser 10-6 Texas Omaha, Neb.
1984 Cal St. Fullerton (66-20) Augie Garrido 3-1 Texas Omaha, Neb.
1983 * Texas (66-14) Cliff Gustafson 4-3 Alabama Omaha, Neb.
1982 * Miami (Fla.) (55-17-1) Ron Fraser 9-3 Wichita State Omaha, Neb.
1981 Arizona State (55-13) Jim Brock 7-4 Oklahoma State Omaha, Neb.
1980 Arizona (45-21-1) Jerry Kindall 5-3 Hawaii Omaha, Neb.
1979 Cal St. Fullerton (60-14-1) Augie Garrido 2-1 Arkansas Omaha, Neb.
1978 * Southern California (54-9) Rod Dedeaux 10-3 Arizona State Omaha, Neb.
1977 Arizona State (57-12) Jim Brock 2-1 South Carolina Omaha, Neb.
1976 Arizona (56-17) Jerry Kindall 7-1 Eastern Michigan Omaha, Neb.
1975 Texas (59-6) Cliff Gustafson 5-1 South Carolina Omaha, Neb.
1974 Southern California (50-20) Rod Dedeaux 7-3 Miami (Fla.) Omaha, Neb.
1973 * Southern California (51-11) Rod Dedeaux 4-3 Arizona State Omaha, Neb.
1972 Southern California (47-13-1) Rod Dedeaux 1-0 Arizona State Omaha, Neb.
1971 Southern California (46-11) Rod Dedeaux 5-2 Southern Illinois Omaha, Neb.
1970 Southern California (45-13) Rod Dedeaux 2-1 (15 inn.) Florida State Omaha, Neb.
1969 Arizona State (56-11) Bobby Winkles 10-1 Tulsa Omaha, Neb.
1968 * Southern California (43-12-1) Rod Dedeaux 4-3 Southern Illinois Omaha, Neb.
1967 Arizona State (53-12) Bobby Winkles 11-0 Houston Omaha, Neb.
1966 Ohio State (27-6-1) Marty Karow 8-2 Oklahoma State Omaha, Neb.
1965 Arizona State (54-8) Bobby Winkles 2-0 Ohio State Omaha, Neb.
1964 Minnesota (31-12) Dick Siebert 5-1 Missouri Omaha, Neb.
1963 Southern California (35-10) Rod Dedeaux 5-2 Arizona Omaha, Neb.
1962 Michigan (34-15) Don Lund 5-4 (15 inn.) Santa Clara Omaha, Neb.
1961 * Southern California (36-7) Rod Dedeaux 1-0 Oklahoma State Omaha, Neb.
1960 Minnesota (34-7-1) Dick Siebert 2-1 (10 inn.) Southern California Omaha, Neb.
1959 Oklahoma State (27-5) Toby Greene 5-0 Arizona Omaha, Neb.
1958 Southern California (29-3) Rod Dedeaux 8-7 (12 inn.) Missouri Omaha, Neb.
1957 * California (35-10) George Wolfman 1-0 Penn State Omaha, Neb.
1956 Minnesota (37-9) Dick Siebert 12-1 Arizona Omaha, Neb.
1955 Wake Forest (29-7) Taylor Sanford 7-6 Western Michigan Omaha, Neb.
1954 Missouri (22-4) John “Hi” Simmons 4-1 Rollins Omaha, Neb.
1953 Michigan (21-9) Ray Fisher 7-5 Texas Omaha, Neb.
1952 Holy Cross (21-3) Jack Barry 8-4 Missouri Omaha, Neb.
1951 * Oklahoma (19-9) Jack Baer 3-2 Tennessee Omaha, Neb.
1950 Texas (27-6) Bibb Falk 3-0 Washington State Omaha, Neb.
1949 * Texas (23-7) Bibb Falk 10-3 Wake Forest Wichita, Kan.
1948 Southern California (26-4) Sam Barry 9-2 Yale Kalamazoo, Mich.
1947 * California (31-10) Clint Evans 8-7 Yale Kalamazoo, Mich.

 *Indicates undefeated teams in College World Series play.



Link

Continue Reading

College Sports

5 Mass. skaters make preliminary USA Hockey U18 Women’s National Team Festival roster

Phillips Andover’s Maggie Averill will be a popular college hockey prospect. (Patrick Donnelly/NEHJ) There’s already a fair amount of local representation heading to USA Hockey’s Girls Under-18 Women’s National Team Festival. The festival will take place in Lake Placid, N.Y., from August 3-9. The initial roster includes 15 players. A third of that group is […]

Published

on


Maggie Averill

Phillips Andover’s Maggie Averill will be a popular college hockey prospect. (Patrick Donnelly/NEHJ)

There’s already a fair amount of local representation heading to USA Hockey’s Girls Under-18 Women’s National Team Festival.

The festival will take place in Lake Placid, N.Y., from August 3-9.

The initial roster includes 15 players. A third of that group is made up of Massachusetts locals, including current prep hockey stars.

Players competing in the National 15 and 16/17 camps will also have the opportunity to advance to the U18 festival. A final roster of approximately 46 players across the 2008, 2009 and 2010 age groups will be released on July 29, 2025, following the conclusion of the 16/17 and 15 camps.

At the U18 festival, players will be evaluated to make the U18 Select Series team, which competes against Canada the week after the festival.

NATIONAL CAMPS: 46 locals make 15 Camp | 36 locals make 16/17 Camp | 12 locals make U19 Training Camp

Here’s which locals made the preliminary roster.



Link

Continue Reading

Most Viewed Posts

Trending