Connect with us

Sports

NCAA Track And Field Championships Qualifiers 2025. Here’s The Women’s List

With each of the First Rounds of the NCAA Division I Track & Field Championships in the rear-view mirror, it’s time to shift our attention to Hayward Field in Eugene, Oregon. Subscribe To FloTrack To Watch The Diamond League In 2025 2025 NCAA D1 Track and Field West Regionals Results 2025 NCAA D1 Track and […]

Published

on


With each of the First Rounds of the NCAA Division I Track & Field Championships in the rear-view mirror, it’s time to shift our attention to Hayward Field in Eugene, Oregon.

  • Subscribe To FloTrack To Watch The Diamond League In 2025
  • 2025 NCAA D1 Track and Field West Regionals Results
  • 2025 NCAA D1 Track and Field East Regionals Results
  • Men’s NCAA Track & Field Championships Qualifiers 2025

This year’s slate of qualifiers comprises some of the greatest athletes in both collegiate and world history, from title-chasing sprinters to the next generation of distance stars. 

In total, the top 12 athletes from each regional event have advanced to the Championships, totaling 24 qualifiers per event. 

Additionally, 12 relay teams from each relay at event at both Regional will qualify for the Championships. 

The NCAA Track & Field Championships will take place in Eugene, Oregon, from June 11 to June 14.

NCAA Track & Field Championship Women’s Qualifiers

Women’s 100m Qualifiers 

  1. Shenese Walker (Florida State) – 10.98
  2. Leah Bertrand (Ohio State) – 10.99
  3. Dajaz Defrand (USC) – 11.00
  4. JaMeesia Ford (South Carolina) – 11.00
  5. Joella Lloyd (Florida State) – 11.01
  6. Anthaya Charlton (Florida) – 11.01
  7. Victoria Cameron (Tarleton State) – 11.01
  8. Samirah Moody (USC) – 11.02
  9. Jasmine Montgomery (Texas A&M) – 11.02
  10. Brianna Selby (USC) – 11.03
  11. Jassani Carter (USC) – 11.06
  12. Jade Brown (Arizona) – 11.07
  13. Cynteria James (South Carolina) – 11.07
  14. Alicia Burnett (Missouri) – 11.10
  15. Tima Godbless (LSU) – 11.11
  16. Aniyah Kitt (Clemson) – 11.12
  17. Iyana Gray (TCU) – 11.14
  18. Kelly Ufodiama (E. Carolina) – 11.15
  19. Indya Mayberry (TCU) – 11.15
  20. London Tucker (TCU) – 11.17
  21. Camryn Dickson (Texas A&M) – 11.17
  22. Kaila Jackson (Georgia) – 11.17
  23. Kailei Collins (Howard) – 11.21
  24. Reign Redmond (Georgia) – 11.24

Women’s 200m Qualifiers 

  1. Madison Whyte (USC) – 22.16
  2. Jasmine Montgomery (Texas A&M) – 22.26
  3. JaMeesia Ford (South Carolina) – 22.27
  4. Indya Mayberry (TCU) – 22.30
  5. Dajaz Defrand (USC) – 22.33
  6. Jassani Carter (USC) – 22.52
  7. Kelly Ufodiama (E. Carolina) – 22.54
  8. Tiriah Kelley (Baylor) – 22.58
  9. Kenondra Davis (Texas) – 22.58
  10. Taylor Snaer (UCLA) – 22.64
  11. Tima Godbless (LSU) – 22.68
  12. Camryn Dickson (Texas A&M) – 22.69
  13. Leah Bertrand (Ohio State) – 22.71
  14. Cynteria James (South Carolina) – 22.72
  15. Jayla Jamison (South Carolina) – 22.77
  16. Fatouma Conde (Ohio State) – 22.78
  17. Kya Epps (Cincinnati) – 22.82
  18. Holly Okuku (Texas) – 22.85
  19. Samirah Moody (USC) – 22.86
  20. Gabrielle Matthews (Florida) – 22.87
  21. Iaunia Pointer (Syracuse) – 22.90
  22. Naomi Johnson (UCLA) – 22.94
  23. Precious Nzeakor (Alabama) – 23.03
  24. Aniyah Bigam (LSU) – 23.07

Women’s 400m Qualifiers 

  1. Kaylyn Brown (Arkansas) – 50.58
  2. Rachel Joseph (Iowa State) – 50.66
  3. Aaliyah Butler (Georgia) – 50.68
  4. Dejanea Oakley (Georgia) – 50.70
  5. Ella Onojuvwevwo (LSU) – 50.99
  6. Rosey Effiong (Arkansas) – 51.07
  7. Vimbayi Maisvorewa (Auburn) – 51.10
  8. Yemi John (USC) – 51.14
  9. Javonya Valcourt (Tennessee) – 51.16
  10. Sami Oblad (BYU) – 51.29
  11. Kaelyaah Liburd (Florida State) – 51.31
  12. Aaliyah Pyatt (Arkansas) – 51.36
  13. Shaquena Foote (San Diego St) – 51.38
  14. Damaris Mutunga (Iowa) – 51.57
  15. Joanne Reid (Arkansas) – 51.65
  16. Caitlyn Bobb (Virginia Tech) – 51.65
  17. Maygan Shaw (Northwestern St) – 51.68
  18. Davenae Fagan (Cincinnati) – 51.76
  19. Zaya Akins (South Carolina) – 51.77
  20. Charlee Crawford (Rutgers) – 51.80
  21. Jaydan Wood (Texas A&M) – 51.88
  22. Sara Reifenrath (South Dakota) – 51.91
  23. Onyah Onyinye Favour (SE Louisiana) – 51.94
  24. Sanaria Butler (Arkansas) – 52.00

Women’s 800m Qualifiers 

  1. Michaela Rose (LSU) – 1:58.91
  2. Meghan Hunter (BYU) – 1:58.95
  3. Gladys Chepngetich (Clemson) – 1:59.47
  4. Makayla Paige (North Carolina) – 1:59.73
  5. Roisin Willis (Stanford) – 1:59.81
  6. Smilla Kolbe (North Florida) – 2:00.09
  7. Lauren Tolbert (Duke) – 2:00.27
  8. Janet Jepkemboi Amimo (Kentucky) – 2:00.36
  9. Sophia Gorriaran (Harvard) – 2:00.46
  10. Veronica Hargrave (Indiana) – 2:00.51
  11. Laura Pellicoro (Portland) – 2:01.44
  12. Alli Bookin-Nosbisch (Iowa) – 2:01.70
  13. Emma Sullivan (Kennesaw State) – 2:01.71
  14. Makayla Clark (Iowa State) – 2:01.75
  15. Victoria Bossong (Harvard) – 2:01.83
  16. Emma Kelley (Wisconsin) – 2:01.87
  17. Kaylie Politza (Oklahoma State) – 2:02.04
  18. Jenna Schwinghamer (Kentucky) – 2:02.38
  19. Tessa Buswell (BYU) – 2:02.54
  20. Fanny Arendt (Texas Tech) – 2:02.63
  21. Aaliyah Moore (Kansas) – 2:02.87
  22. Marie Warneke (UCLA) – 2:02.93
  23. Sanu Jallow (Arkansas) – 2:03.16
  24. Maeve O’Neill (Providence) – 2:03.44

Women’s 1500m Qualifiers 

  1. Shannon Flockhart (Providence) – 4:04.97
  2. Bahiya El Arfaoui (Eastern Kentucky) – 4:05.20
  3. Silvia Jelelgo (Clemson) – 4:05.68
  4. Maggi Congdon (Northern Arizona) – 4:05.73
  5. Kimberley May (Providence) – 4:06.31
  6. Klaudia Kazimierska (Oregon) – 4:06.53
  7. Silan Ayyildiz (Oregon) – 4:06.61
  8. Chloe Foerster (Washington) – 4:06.74
  9. Vera Sjoberg (Boston) – 4:07.39
  10. Carlee Hansen (BYU) – 4:07.64
  11. Margot Appleton (Virginia) – 4:08.04
  12. Sophie O’Sullivan (Washington) – 4:08.21
  13. Mena Scatchard (Princeton) – 4:08.34
  14. Salma Elbadra (South Carolina) – 4:08.35
  15. Riley Chamberlain (BYU) – 4:08.42
  16. Judy Rono (New Mexico) – 4:09.07
  17. Allie Zealand (Liberty) – 4:09.76
  18. Lindsey Butler (Virginia Tech) – 4:10.32
  19. Amina Maatoug (Washington) – 4:10.34
  20. Taryn Parks (North Carolina) – 4:10.77
  21. Mia Barnett (Oregon) – 4:10.88
  22. Charlotte Tomkinson (Georgetown) – 4:10.92
  23. Berlyn Schutz (Nebraska) – 4:11.01
  24. Kaiya Robertson (Boise State) – 4:11.38

Women’s 5000m Qualifiers 

  1. Grace Hartman (NC State) – 15:23.52
  2. Margot Appleton (Virginia) – 15:25.99
  3. Florence Caron (Penn State) – 15:27.05
  4. Vera Sjoberg (Boston) – 15:27.51
  5. Silvia Jelelgo (Clemson) – 15:27.68
  6. Samantha Bush (NC State) – 15:28.10
  7. Chloe Scrimgeour (Georgetown) – 15:28.65
  8. Alex Millard (Providence) – 15:28.91
  9. Rachel Forsyth (Michigan State) – 15:30.50
  10. Edna Chelulei (Eastern Kentucky) – 15:30.56
  11. Brenda Jepchirchir (Auburn) – 15:33.50
  12. Sadie Sigfstead (Villanova) – 15:33.68
  13. Paityn Noe (Arkansas) – 15:43.45
  14. Amina Maatoug (Washington) – 15:49.52
  15. Jenna Hutchins (BYU) – 15:49.95
  16. Sophia Kennedy (Stanford) – 15:50.36
  17. Pamela Kosgei (New Mexico) – 15:51.20
  18. Isca Chelangat (Oklahoma State) – 15:51.86
  19. Marion Jepngetich (New Mexico) – 15:52.44
  20. Julia David-Smith (Washington) – 15:54.92
  21. Maelle Porcher (Iowa State) – 15:55.73
  22. Ava Mitchell (Northern Arizona) – 16:00.58
  23. Zofia Dudek (Stanford) – 16:01.80
  24. Agnes McTighe (Northern Arizona) – 16:01.83

Men’s 10,000m Qualifiers 

  1. Grace Hartman (NC State) – 32:32.80
  2. Florence Caron (Penn State) – 32:44.94
  3. Hilda Olemomoi (Florida) – 32:45.45
  4. Chloe Scrimgeour (Georgetown) – 32:45.60
  5. Brenda Tuwei (Alabama) – 32:48.02
  6. Ruth White (New Hampshire) – 32:50.17
  7. Edna Chelulei (Eastern Kentucky) – 32:50.68
  8. Joy Naukot (West Virginia) – 32:51.33
  9. Jenny Schilling (Virginia) – 32:51.43
  10. Sadie Sigfstead (Villanova) – 32:56.98
  11. Edna Chepkemoi (LSU) – 33:11.87
  12. Brenda Jepchirchir (Auburn) – 33:13.61
  13. Pamela Kosgei (New Mexico) – 33:37.04
  14. Diana Cherotich (Oregon) – 33:43.18
  15. Rosina Machu (Gonzaga) – 33:50.76
  16. Paityn Noe (Arkansas) – 33:56.89
  17. Jadyn Keeler (North Dakota) – 34:07.67
  18. Ali Weimer (Minnesota) – 34:09.14
  19. Mckaylie Caesar (Utah) – 34:15.26
  20. Morgan Jensen (Utah) – 34:15.28
  21. Sydney Thorvaldson (Arkansas) – 34:16.03
  22. Ruth Kimeli (Baylor) – 34:21.49
  23. Logan Hofstee (Gonzaga) – 34:30.82
  24. Josphine Mwaura (Oklahoma State) – 34:31.93

Women’s 100H Qualifiers 

  1. Aaliyah McCormick (Oregon) – 12.74
  2. Habiba Harris (Florida) – 12.80
  3. Ana-Liese Torian (Auburn) – 12.81
  4. Yanla Ndjip-Nyemeck (UCLA) – 12.82
  5. Jaiya Covington (Texas A&M) – 12.87
  6. Myreanna Bebe (Tennessee) – 12.89
  7. Marissa Simpson (UTEP) – 12.90
  8. Emmi Scales (Kentucky) – 12.93
  9. Janela Spencer (Ohio State) – 12.94
  10. Kiara Smith (Tennessee) – 12.94
  11. Adaobi Tabugbo (UCF) – 12.95
  12. Akala Garrett (Texas) – 12.98
  13. Marcia Sey (Howard) – 12.99
  14. Destiny Smith (Texas Tech) – 13.01
  15. Oneka Wilson (Clemson) – 13.04
  16. Rachel Mehringer (Indiana State) – 13.08
  17. Celeste Polzonetti (UCLA) – 13.08
  18. Amari Kiluvia (TCU) – 13.09
  19. Tonie-Ann Forbes (Texas Tech) – 13.11
  20. Falon Spearman (Vanderbilt) – 13.13
  21. Simone Ballard (Arkansas) – 13.14
  22. Sky Hagan (San Jose State) – 13.14
  23. Camden Bentley (Kentucky) – 13.14
  24. Shania Myers (Arkansas) – 13.15

Women’s 400H Qualifiers 

  1. Savannah Sutherland (Michigan) – 54.39
  2. Akala Garrett (Texas) – 54.72
  3. Michelle Smith (Georgia) – 55.25
  4. Sanaa Hebron (Miami) – 55.47
  5. Tyra Wilson (Florida State) – 55.63
  6. Allyria McBride (Vanderbilt) – 55.65
  7. Calisha Taylor (Baylor) – 55.94
  8. Amelliah Birdow (TCU) – 55.96
  9. Aniya Woodruff (Howard) – 56.12
  10. Safhia Hinds (Kansas State) – 56.34
  11. Aliya Garozzo (Duke) – 56.46
  12. Jessicka Woods (Mississippi State) – 56.48
  13. Braelyn Baker (Duke) – 56.48
  14. Chloe Fair (Harvard) – 56.49
  15. LiNay Perry (Northern Arizona) – 56.70
  16. Jenna James (Oklahoma) – 56.71
  17. Jourdin Edwards (Kansas State) – 56.73
  18. Tia Williams (TCU) – 56.74
  19. Loubna Benhadja (UTEP) – 56.77
  20. Dyandra Gray (Minnesota) – 56.86
  21. Natalie Block (Milwaukee) – 56.95
  22. Yasmeen Tinsley (Monmouth) – 56.97
  23. Mackenzie Collins (Texas) – 57.14
  24. Macaela Walker (Cincinnati) – 57.16

Women’s 3k Steeplechase Qualifiers 

  1. Doris Lemngole (Alabama) – 9:13.12
  2. Lexy Halladay-Lowry (BYU) – 9:23.03
  3. Angelina Napoleon (NC State) – 9:37.42
  4. Karrie Baloga (Northern Arizona) – 9:40.13
  5. Sarah Tait (West Virginia) – 9:42.14
  6. Debora Cherono (Texas A&M) – 9:42.55
  7. Taylor Lovell (BYU) – 9:42.83
  8. Katelyn Stewart-Barnett (Michigan State) – 9:47.15
  9. Sydney Masciarelli (North Carolina) – 9:48.12
  10. Layla Roebke (Louisville) – 9:49.08
  11. Maggie Liebich (Washington) – 9:53.74
  12. Emily Paupore (Central Michigan) – 9:53.89
  13. Hanna Ackermann (Boise State) – 9:54.40
  14. Madaline Ullom (Penn State) – 9:54.42
  15. Molly Malague (Harvard) – 9:56.92
  16. Sophia McDonnell (New Mexico) – 9:57.14
  17. Kennady Fontenot (Texas A&M) – 9:58.13
  18. Leah Jeruto (Oklahoma) – 9:58.74
  19. Nelly Jemeli (Mississippi State) – 9:59.39
  20. Shelby Jensen (Utah State) – 10:00.46
  21. Gwenno Goode (La Salle) – 10:01.65
  22. Ebba Cronholm (Kansas) – 10:01.90
  23. Katja Pattis (Idaho) – 10:02.04
  24. Brooke Mullins (Florida State) – 10:05.48

Women’s 4x100m Qualifiers 

  1. USC – 42.36
  2. FL State – 42.72
  3. South Carolina – 42.81
  4. LSU – 42.85
  5. Texas – 42.85
  6. UCLA – 43.04
  7. Georgia – 43.11
  8. TX A&M – 43.12
  9. TCU – 43.13
  10. Baylor – 43.15
  11. Florida – 43.17
  12. Illinois – 43.35
  13. Howard – 43.36
  14. Clemson – 43.44
  15. Ohio State – 43.46
  16. UCF – 43.57
  17. Kentucky – 43.64
  18. Tarleton State – 43.66
  19. Tennessee – 43.70
  20. Duke – 43.72
  21. Stanford – 43.84
  22. Utah – 43.85
  23. Iowa – 43.86

Women’s 4x400m Qualifiers 

  1. Arkansas – 3:25.48
  2. Georgia – 3:25.80
  3. Iowa – 3:26.90
  4. South Carolina – 3:27.56
  5. TX A&M – 3:27.67
  6. Tennessee – 3:27.76
  7. Duke – 3:27.87
  8. Auburn – 3:28.06
  9. UCLA – 3:28.18
  10. Kentucky – 3:28.70
  11. Miami (Fla.) – 3:28.89
  12. Michigan – 3:29.22
  13. Clemson – 3:29.24
  14. Harvard – 3:29.35
  15. USC – 3:29.42
  16. LSU – 3:29.55
  17. IA State – 3:29.68
  18. FL State – 3:30.87
  19. New Mexico – 3:31.71
  20. Arizona – 3:32.56
  21. TX Tech – 3:32.66
  22. TCU – 3:33.56
  23. Baylor – 3:33.82
  24. MT State – 3:34.31

Women’s Long Jump Qualifiers 

  1. Alexis Brown (Baylor) – 6.94m
  2. Prestina Ochonogor (Tarleton State) – 6.66m
  3. Alyssa Jones (Stanford) – 6.65m
  4. Synclair Savage (Louisville) – 6.64m
  5. Tacoria Humphrey (Illinois) – 6.63m
  6. Janae De Gannes (Baylor) – 6.58m
  7. Sophia Beckmon (Illinois) – 6.56m
  8. Imani Moore (Georgia Southern) – 6.54m
  9. Anthaya Charlton (Florida) – 6.52m
  10. Aaliyah Foster (Texas) – 6.44m
  11. Hailey Coey (Montana State) – 6.44m
  12. Shalom Olotu (Kansas State) – 6.44m
  13. Mariia Horielova (Alabama) – 6.43m
  14. Jenica Bosko (Arizona) – 6.42m
  15. Alyssa Banales (Florida) – 6.41m
  16. Sydney Johnson (UCLA) – 6.38m
  17. Funminiyi Olajide (Arkansas) – 6.36m
  18. Georgina Scoot (Princeton) – 6.32m
  19. Marta Amani (Harvard) – 6.30m
  20. Paige Floriea (Rutgers) – 6.22m
  21. Molly Wise (Richmond) – 6.18m
  22. Ella Scally (Miami (Ohio)) – 6.17m
  23. Julia Sue-Kam-Ling (Jacksonville) – 6.15m
  24. Mariama Hunt (NC State) – 6.11m

Women’s Triple Jump Qualifiers 

  1. Shantae Foreman (Clemson) – 14.01m
  2. Winny Bii (Texas A&M) – 14.00m
  3. Victoria Gorlova (Texas Tech) – 13.99m
  4. Daniela Wamokpego (Iowa) – 13.67m
  5. Agur Dwol (Oklahoma) – 13.65m
  6. Simone Johnson (San Jose State) – 13.63m
  7. Tamiah Washington (Texas Tech) – 13.54m
  8. Katharina Graman (San Jose State) – 13.50m
  9. Emilia Sjostrand (San Jose State) – 13.49m
  10. Skylynn Townsend (Georgia) – 13.48m
  11. Ashley Moore (Oklahoma) – 13.48m
  12. Rachela Pace (UTSA) – 13.46m
  13. Shalom Olotu (Kansas State) – 13.45m
  14. Ryann Porter (Oregon) – 13.42m
  15. Asia Phillips (Florida) – 13.29m
  16. Machaeda Linton (LSU) – 13.25m
  17. Olivia Dowd (North Carolina A&T) – 13.22m
  18. Sophie Galloway (Kentucky) – 13.08m
  19. Cameran Gist (South Carolina) – 13.07m
  20. Georgina Scoot (Princeton) – 13.04m
  21. Jada Joseph (Brown) – 13.01m
  22. Kayla Pinkard (Florida State) – 13.01m
  23. Sharvari Parulekar (Louisville) – 12.93m
  24. Christina Warren (Miami (Fla.)) – 12.93m

Women’s High Jump Qualifiers 

  1. Alyssa Jones (Stanford) – 1.84m
  2. Temitope Adeshina (Texas Tech) – 1.84m
  3. Maria Arboleda (Iowa) – 1.84m
  4. Rose Yeboah (Illinois) – 1.84m
  5. Kristi Perez-Snyman (Missouri) – 1.84m
  6. Jenna Rogers (Nebraska) – 1.84m
  7. Sharie Enoe (Kansas State) – 1.84m
  8. Claudina Diaz (Missouri) – 1.84m
  9. Cheyla Scott (South Carolina) – 1.82m
  10. Celia Rifaterra (Virginia) – 1.82m
  11. Elena Kulichenko (Georgia) – 1.82m
  12. Spirit Morgan (North Carolina A&T) – 1.82m
  13. Miracle Ailes (Alabama) – 1.82m
  14. Eva Baldursdottir (Pittsburgh) – 1.82m
  15. Amaya Ugarte (Ohio State) – 1.82m
  16. Valentina Fakrogha (UCLA) – 1.81m
  17. Alice Taylor (Rice) – 1.81m
  18. Ajia Hughes (Southern Utah) – 1.81m
  19. Zharia Taylor (UC Irvine) – 1.81m
  20. Kendall Ward (Georgia Tech) – 1.79m
  21. Svenia DeConinck (Kent State) – 1.79m
  22. Zahra Amos (Buffalo) – 1.79m
  23. Carly Tarentino (Virginia) – 1.79m
  24. Diamonasia Taylor (Murray State) – 1.79m

Women’s Pole Vault Qualifiers 

  1. Anna Willis (South Dakota) – 4.42m
  2. Ka’Leila Abrille (UCLA) – 4.42m
  3. Gennifer Hirata (South Dakota) – 4.42m
  4. Amanda Moll (Washington) – 4.42m
  5. Hana Moll (Washington) – 4.42m
  6. Katerina Adamiec (UCLA) – 4.42m
  7. Carly Pujol (Arkansas State) – 4.42m
  8. Mia Morello (Illinois) – 4.42m
  9. Molly Haywood (Baylor) – 4.42m
  10. Erica Ellis (Kansas) – 4.42m
  11. Emily Fitzsimmons (Oregon) – 4.42m
  12. Tenly Kuhn (Baylor) – 4.32m
  13. Chloe Timberg (Rutgers) – 4.24m
  14. Sarah Schmitt (Tennessee) – 4.24m
  15. Johanna Duplantis (LSU) – 4.24m
  16. Lyndsey Reed (Virginia Tech) – 4.24m
  17. Chiara Sistermann (Virginia Tech) – 4.24m
  18. Julia Fixsen (Virginia Tech) – 4.24m
  19. Alyssa Quinones-Mixon (Auburn) – 4.24m
  20. Gemma Tutton (Duke) – 4.24m
  21. Lilly Nichols (App State) – 4.24m
  22. Ashley Callahan (Louisville) – 4.24m
  23. Sydney Horn (High Point) – 4.24m
  24. Payton Phillips (Kentucky) – 4.09m

Women’s Hammer Qualifiers 

  1. Gudrun Hallgrimsdottir (VCU) – 69.53m
  2. Valentina Savva (California) – 67.75m
  3. Stephanie Ratcliffe (Georgia) – 67.13m
  4. Kali Terza (Kennesaw State) – 66.75m
  5. Emma Robbins (Oklahoma State) – 66.47m
  6. Emily Fink (Army West Point) – 66.46m
  7. Shelby Frank (Texas Tech) – 66.17m
  8. Paola Bueno (Liberty) – 65.73m
  9. Lara Roberts (Texas State) – 65.61m
  10. Chioma Njoku (Maryland) – 65.60m
  11. Marie Rougetet (Mississippi State) – 65.23m
  12. Audrey Jacobs (California) – 64.94m
  13. Annika Kelly (Virginia) – 64.94m
  14. Chloe Lindeman (Wisconsin) – 64.62m
  15. Giavonna Meeks (California) – 64.55m
  16. Kennedy Clarke (Oklahoma) – 64.11m
  17. Kassidy Gallagher (Oklahoma) – 64.08m
  18. Kate Powers (Kentucky) – 63.91m
  19. Emilia Kolokotroni (Harvard) – 63.63m
  20. Mariana Pestana (Virginia Tech) – 63.52m
  21. Kenna Curry (North Dakota) – 63.44m
  22. Skylar Soli (Ole Miss) – 63.44m
  23. Monique Hardy (Kansas State) – 62.99m
  24. Kajsa Borrman (Colorado State) – 62.93m

Women’s Discus Qualifiers 

  1. Jayden Ulrich (Louisville) – 64.81m
  2. Cierra Jackson (Fresno State) – 61.27m
  3. Shelby Frank (TX Tech) – 61.23m
  4. Alida Van Daalen (Florida) – 59.78m
  5. Amanda Ngandu-Ntumba (Cincinnati) – 59.43m
  6. Caisa-Marie Lindfors (California) – 59.03m
  7. Sofia Sluchaninova (Kansas) – 58.22m
  8. Taylor Kesner (Wisconsin) – 57.83m
  9. Jade Whitfield (Louisville) – 57.05m
  10. Angeludi Asaah (Penn) – 56.32m
  11. Tamaiah Koonce (KS State) – 55.99m
  12. Krishna Jayasankar Menon (UNLV) – 55.61m
  13. Zoe Burleson (TX Tech) – 55.47m
  14. Princesse Hyman (LSU) – 55.11m
  15. Adrienne Adams (Auburn) – 55.09m
  16. Estel Valeanu (Virginia) – 55.06m
  17. Paige Low (Oklahoma) – 54.82m
  18. Michaelle Valentin (FIU) – 54.73m
  19. Gretchen Hoekstre (BYU) – 54.58m
  20. Donna Douglas (Tennessee) – 54.56m
  21. Milina Wepiwe (Harvard) – 54.54m
  22. Ines Lopez (AZ State) – 54.39m
  23. Klaire Kovatch (Colo State) – 54.32m
  24. Jamora Alves (St. John’s) – 54.16m

Women’s Shot Put Qualifiers 

  1. Mya Lesnar (Colo State) – 18.50m
  2. Gracelyn Leiseth (Florida) – 18.31m
  3. Akaoma Odeluga (Ole Miss) – 18.24m
  4. Jayden Ulrich (Louisville) – 17.97m
  5. Kalynn Meyer (Nebraska) – 17.96m
  6. Abria Smith (Illinois) – 17.69m
  7. Ashley Erasmus (USC) – 17.58m
  8. Chrystal Herpin (Texas) – 17.55m
  9. Elizabeth Tapper (Michigan) – 17.28m
  10. MyeJoi Williams (Alabama) – 17.18m
  11. Kelsie Murrell-Ross (Georgia) – 17.17m
  12. Nina Ndubuisi (Texas) – 17.15m
  13. Lucija Leko (California) – 17.10m
  14. Alida Van Daalen (Florida) – 17.08m
  15. Megan Hague (Auburn) – 17.00m
  16. Abigail Russell (Michigan) – 16.95m
  17. Treneese Hamilton (Alabama) – 16.92m
  18. Gretchen Hoekstre (BYU) – 16.87m
  19. Amanda Ngandu-Ntumba (Cincinnati) – 16.85m
  20. Makayla Hunter (Indiana) – 16.83m
  21. Melanie Duron (TX State) – 16.75m
  22. Kellyn Kortemeyer (Nebraska) – 16.71m
  23. Cierra Jackson (Fresno State) – 16.71m
  24. Tapenisa Havea (Arizona) – 16.25m

Women’s Heptathlon Qualifiers 

  1. Sofia Iakushina (Texas A&M) – 6260
  2. Pippi Lotta Enok (Oklahoma) – 6258
  3. Jadin O’Brien (Notre Dame) – 6231
  4. Annika Williams (Oregon) – 5914
  5. Lucie Kienast (Illinois) – 5851
  6. Sydney Johnson (UCLA) – 5820
  7. Sofia Cosculluela (Washington) – 5817
  8. Izzy Goudros (Harvard) – 5807
  9. Alaina Brady (Notre Dame) – 5751
  10. Melissa Wullschleger (Illinois) – 5749
  11. Mia Lien (UTSA) – 5741
  12. Maresa Hense (Connecticut) – 5733
  13. Annie Molenhouse (Oklahoma State) – 5729
  14. Pauline Bikembo (Iowa) – 5722
  15. Destiny Masters (Wichita State) – 5715
  16. Juliette Laracuente-Huebner (Cincinnati) – 5698
  17. Claudine Raud-Gumiel (Long Beach State) – 5698
  18. Clare McNamara (Michigan) – 5698
  19. Maddie Pitts (Penn State) – 5677
  20. Kenli Nettles (Ball State) – 5655
  21. Lucy Fellows (Louisville) – 5625
  22. Katelyn Adel (Alabama) – 5619
  23. Shelby Grover (Kent State) – 5555
  24. Ella Spaulding (Fresno State) – 5551





Link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sports

Jutras Selected to Winter Academic All-MAC Team

Story Links ANNVILLE, Pa. – Stevens Institute of Technology junior Danny Jutras was named Academic All-MAC by the Middle Atlantic Conference office Wednesday, following another outstanding indoor track and field season. The Academic All-MAC teams are based off semester grade-point averages (GPA) for the semester of their championship season. The minimum GPA […]

Published

on


ANNVILLE, Pa. – Stevens Institute of Technology junior Danny Jutras was named Academic All-MAC by the Middle Atlantic Conference office Wednesday, following another outstanding indoor track and field season.

The Academic All-MAC teams are based off semester grade-point averages (GPA) for the semester of their championship season. The minimum GPA required is a 3.20, and the student-athlete must remain an eligible member of the team through the conclusion of the season. Voting for this award is based on 50% academic excellence and 50% athletic prowess.

Jutras followed up a spectacular sophomore campaign in 2023-24 (All-MAC First Team in Distance Medley Relay, All-MAC Second Team in 4×800) with another 2x All-MAC Indoor season (800 Meter Third Team, 4×800 Meter Second Team).

Additionally, he etched his name in program lore, breaking the school record in the 800, running 1:54.37 at the Boston University Valentine Invitational on February 14, breaking Tom Selvaggi’s mark that stood for just under eight years.

Athletic Department Social Media

Facebook: “Like” Stevens Athletics         

X (Formerly Twitter): @stevensducks

Instagram: @stevensducks

 

#AllRise

 



Link

Continue Reading

Sports

Diogo Jota Net Worth 2025

Diogo Jota Net Worth 2025: The Sudden Loss of a Football and Esports Star. What was Diogo Jota’s net worth at the time of his death? On July 3, 2025, the world was stunned and deeply saddened by the sudden loss of Diogo Jota, who died tragically in a car crash alongside his brother. At […]

Published

on

Diogo Jota Net Worth 2025

Diogo Jota Net Worth 2025: The Sudden Loss of a Football and Esports Star.

What was Diogo Jota’s net worth at the time of his death?

On July 3, 2025, the world was stunned and deeply saddened by the sudden loss of Diogo Jota, who died tragically in a car crash alongside his brother. At just 26 years old, Jota’s promising life and career were cut heartbreakingly short. At the time of his death, his celebrity net worth was estimated at $18 million.

Known primarily for his role as a forward for Liverpool FC, Jota had also established a strong presence in the esports world. His unique blend of sporting excellence and entrepreneurial spirit extended beyond the pitch. He collaborated on charity and promotional projects with high-profile artists like Dua Lipa and Ed Sheeran, illustrating his wide-reaching impact.

Hints of his lesser-known passion for competitive gaming and investments in esports have sparked widespread interest, revealing a multi-faceted career that extended far beyond football.

Next section: How Diogo Jota Built His Fortune

Diogo Jota wearing Liverpool’s black away kit, skillfully controlling the ball during a match.

Diogo Jota demonstrates precise ball control in Liverpool’s sleek black away kit, showcasing his agility and technique on the pitch.

The Financial Rise of Diogo Jota: Earnings and Endorsements

How Did Jota Make His Money?

Diogo Jota’s wealth was largely built through his football career, complemented by endorsements and smart business ventures.

  • His contract with Liverpool FC, signed in 2020 and renewed in 2023, reportedly paid him a base salary of around $7 million per year, with performance bonuses adding roughly $2 million annually. Over five years, these earnings combined to approximately $45 million.

  • The transfer from Wolverhampton Wanderers to Liverpool in 2020 was valued at roughly $45 million, reflecting his growing market value and talent.

  • Endorsement deals with brands like Nike and EA Sports brought in an estimated $1.5 million per year, including campaigns linked to his esports interests.

  • His esports investments and competitive play contributed an estimated $3 million to his portfolio.

These varied income streams showcased Jota’s business savvy and ability to diversify beyond traditional athlete earnings.

Next section: Lifestyle and Luxuries: What Diogo Jota Did with His Wealth

Diogo Jota using his skill to dribble past two opposing players during a Liverpool match.

Diogo Jota displays exceptional dribbling skills as he deftly beats two defenders, highlighting his agility and flair for taking on challenges.

Lifestyle and Luxuries: Where Did Jota Spend His Wealth?

Despite his youth, Diogo Jota balanced an enviable lifestyle with thoughtful investments.

Real Estate Holdings

Jota owned a luxurious villa in Lisbon, purchased in 2022 for approximately $3 million. The home featured amenities tailored to his passions, including a private gym and a dedicated gaming room. He also owned a townhouse near Liverpool’s city center, acquired in 2021 for around $1.5 million, serving as his residence during the football season.

Luxury Vehicles and Collectibles

His car collection, though modest, reflected his taste for performance and style. It included a Porsche 911 Turbo S valued at about $210,000 and a customized Range Rover Sport worth approximately $120,000. Additionally, Jota collected high-end gaming equipment and memorabilia connected to his esports career.

Net Worth Summary

Asset Type Estimated Value
Football Earnings (Salary & Bonuses, net after taxes) $18 million
Endorsements $4.5 million
Esports Investments $3 million
Real Estate $4.5 million
Vehicles & Collectibles $0.5 million
Estimated Total Net Worth (2025) $18 million

Next section: Diogo Jota: Still In The News

Diogo Jota: The Latest News

In the weeks before his tragic passing, Diogo Jota experienced some of the most joyous moments of his life. He recently celebrated his wedding, surrounded by close family and friends, marking a personal milestone that revealed a side of him away from the public eye.

Just days prior to his death, Liverpool FC secured the Premier League title for the 2024-2025 season. Jota’s crucial goals and consistent performances were instrumental in this victory. Fans and teammates continue to honor his contributions as they process the loss of such a vital figure in the team.

These recent events now carry a bittersweet weight, reminding many of a life full of promise, achievement, and love that ended far too soon.

Next section: The Life and Legacy of Diogo Jota

Diogo Jota at his wedding, smiling alongside his wife, celebrating a joyful family moment.

Diogo Jota shares a heartfelt moment with his wife at his wedding, capturing the happiness of a cherished family occasion.

The Life and Legacy of Diogo Jota

Early Life

Born Diogo José Teixeira da Silva in Porto, Portugal, in December 1996, Jota grew up in a football-loving family. Early on, his father introduced him not only to the beautiful game but also to video gaming, laying the foundation for his dual passions. He began his youth career with local clubs before joining Paços de Ferreira’s academy at 16.

Career Journey

Jota’s professional debut came in 2015 with Paços de Ferreira, where he quickly demonstrated his skill. After spells with Atlético Madrid B and FC Porto, he gained wider recognition at Wolverhampton Wanderers in 2018, impressing in the Premier League. His speed, technical ability, and clinical finishing led to his transfer to Liverpool in 2020, where he became a key attacker and fan favorite.

Beyond football, Jota was a pioneer in bridging sports and gaming. He founded LUNA Esports, a Portuguese esports organization competing in titles such as FIFA, Dota 2, and Rocket League, showcasing his entrepreneurial spirit.

Personal Life

Known for his humility and close family bonds, Jota kept much of his private life away from the media spotlight. He valued his relationships deeply and was committed to giving back through philanthropic efforts focused on youth sports and gaming.

Next section: The Tragic End: What We Know About Diogo Jota’s Death

Next section: A Surprising Dual Career in Esports

Fascinating Factoid: The Gamer Forward

An interesting factoid about Diogo Jota, particularly relevant for a net worth article, is that beyond his elite football career, he was a highly accomplished and deeply invested professional esports player and team owner. Jota was renowned for his exceptional skill in FIFA (now EA Sports FC), frequently competing at a high level and even winning tournaments. Furthermore, he owned and was heavily involved in LUNA Esports (formerly Diogo Jota Esports), a Portuguese esports organization that competes in various titles like Dota 2, Rocket League, and EA Sports FC.

This passionate pursuit of competitive gaming, which included significant personal investment and ownership in the rapidly growing esports industry, showcased a savvy business mind and a diversified interest that contributed to his overall financial portfolio.

The Tragic End: What We Know About Diogo Jota’s Death

On July 3, 2025, Diogo Jota and his brother died in a car accident near Porto, Portugal. Authorities continue to investigate the details, but initial reports indicate the crash occurred late at night in adverse weather conditions.

The sudden loss has left a profound impact on the football and esports communities worldwide. Liverpool FC released a statement expressing their deep sorrow and support for Jota’s family during this difficult time. Fans and peers continue to mourn the passing of a young athlete whose potential was just beginning to be fully realized.

Liverpool FC released the following statement after his tragic death:

“Liverpool Football Club are devastated by the tragic passing of Diogo Jota.

The club have been informed the 28-year-old has passed away following a road traffic accident in Spain along with his brother, Andre.

Liverpool FC will be making no further comment at this time and request the privacy of Diogo and Andre’s family, friends, teammates and club staff is respected as they try to come to terms with an unimaginable loss.

We will continue to provide them with our full support.”

Next section: People Also Ask

Diogo Jota standing with Portugal teammates in their national kits before a football match.

Diogo Jota lines up alongside his Portugal teammates, united and focused before kickoff in an international match.

People Also Ask

How did Diogo Jota die?

Diogo Jota tragically died in a car crash on July 3, 2025, alongside his brother near Porto, Portugal.

What will happen to his fortune?

His fortune will be managed by his family and estate executors, with some funds potentially allocated to charitable causes according to his wishes.

What happens to his Liverpool contract now he has died?

Liverpool FC has confirmed that his contract is now void but will honor his memory through support for his family.

How many goals has Jota scored for Liverpool?

Diogo Jota scored 65 goals in competitive matches for Liverpool across all competitions.

Though his life ended far too soon, Diogo Jota leaves behind a remarkable legacy both on the football pitch and in the esports arena. His estimated $18 million celebrity net worth in 2025 tells only part of the story of a young man whose ambition, talent, and passion inspired many and broke barriers.

Diogo Jota wearing a Liverpool coat, preparing for a match with focused determination.

Diogo Jota dons a Liverpool coat before the game, ready to give his all on the pitch for the Reds.

Explore More Sporting Net Worth Articles:

Cristiano Ronaldo’s Net Worth In 2025: A Deep Dive Into His Billion Dollar Fortune.

Michael Jordan’s Net Worth 2025: His Crazy Fortune Explored.

Tom Brady Net Worth: The $300 Million Empire.

Disclaimer: How We Estimate Net Worth 

Our net worth figures are estimates based on publicly available information, including real estate records, reported earnings, public filings, industry data, and expert analysis. Because private financial details are rarely disclosed, these numbers reflect approximations rather than precise amounts. We regularly update our estimates to incorporate new information and ensure ongoing accuracy.

Curious to learn more about the legends who shaped the sporting landscape? Explore our net worth section now for exclusive updates and deep dives into the lives and fortunes of your favorite icons!

Continue Reading

Sports

UCA to opt out of House settlement | The Arkansas Democrat-Gazette

Let us read it for you. Listen now. Your browser does not support the audio element. The University of Central Arkansas will not opt in for the House v. NCAA settlement, a landmark restructuring of college athletics that went into effect Tuesday. The settlement, which was officially approved June 6 by U.S. District Court Judge […]

Published

on


The University of Central Arkansas will not opt in for the House v. NCAA settlement, a landmark restructuring of college athletics that went into effect Tuesday.

The settlement, which was officially approved June 6 by U.S. District Court Judge Claudia Wilken, ended three separate class-action lawsuits between the NCAA and lawyers representing Division I athletes. All three lawsuits claimed the NCAA was limiting athletes’ earning power.

Several mostly smaller schools have decided to wait at least a year to see how things develop, including legal risks and Title IX concerns.

In an interview Wednesday, UCA Athletic Director Matt Whiting said he had multiple concerns over what the effects of the settlement would look like if UCA were to be a part of the reported 82% of Division I schools planning to opt in for the 2025-26 school year.

By virtue of opting out of the settlement, UCA will not be restricted by the new roster limits, which Whiting cited as a key reason for the decision.

“On July 1, we entered a new era of college athletics, where revenue will be shared with student-athletes,” Whiting said. “We’ve made the decision at UCA, for 2025-26, to opt out. The reason for us, really, you look at the house settlement and what it entails, it’s revenue sharing, it’s roster limitations, and also scholarship limits change, right? Revenue sharing and scholarship limits are really one piece, but the big thing for us is the roster limitation.”

Among the terms of the settlement, schools can share up for $20.5 million with their student-athletes. Schools will also be set with roster limits, paired with the removal of scholarship caps, meaning each rostered athlete could be placed on full athletic financial aid.

The scholarship limits for specific UCA sports are 105 for football, 15 each for men’s and women’s basketball, 34 for baseball, 25 for softball, 18 for volleyball and 28 each for men’s and women’s soccer, 17 each for men’s and women’s cross country, 45 each for men’s and women’s track and field, 9 each for men’s and women’s golf, 19 for women’s beach volleyball and 65 for STUNT, a competition cheer sport.

As two examples, the Bears’ football team typically rosters around 130 players, and the baseball team sits somewhere around 40. The school would lose dozens of student-athletes who pay tuition annually if it were to cut roster spots.

“I think it’s unique where we’re at,” Whiting said. “We can be a revenue driver for UCA. We’re proud of the number of student-athletes that we have in our program. Opting in would require us to reduce by a significant amount of student-athletes in our program. And so that’s obviously lost revenue for the university during a time where enrollment across the country is declining.

“It really seems to be counterintuitive to the mission of what the university is trying to do on the enrollment front. So we feel really the roster limitations piece is the piece that’s kind of tough to get around if you opt in.”

The $20.5 million number is the limit to what schools can provide athletes in revenue sharing, but there is no floor to what can be provided. Many schools, particularly those at the Football Championship Subdivision level, like UCA, will pay nowhere near that number. If UCA were to opt into the settlement in future years, it would pay a significantly smaller number than that. UCA’s entire athletics budget for the 2024-25 school year was $8,301,765.

“Revenue sharing is, to me, it’s an interesting term even to use in this,” Whiting said. “I think budget reallocation may be a better way to describe it. You’re adding a $20.5 million expense to your athletic department budget. That’s tough to do, right? I think we’re all operating lean, and we’re all operating to the best of our ability. You’re trying to drive different revenue streams and create additional revenue.

“I think the revenue across the board in college athletics is different at all levels, right? And so, ultimately, I don’t know that that is very instrumental at our level, but we’ll see. We’ll see what happens there.”

Schools will have the option to opt in or out of the current settlement annually. Whiting did not rule out UCA deciding to opt in for future school years. The deadline to opt in for the 2026-27 school year is March 1, 2026.

“We’re going to monitor things,” he said. “You don’t know what happens in the future, and it’s a unique time. Who knows what will be right for all institutions, but we feel opting out at this time is in the best interest for University of Central Arkansas.”



Link

Continue Reading

Sports

H.S. Boys Track and Field: Benny Delbaugh ran quick laps, effectively anchored Shamokin relay teams | Sports

Benny Delbaugh was part of four races at the annual District 4 Class 3A track and field championships back in May. Remarkably, all four ended with him crossing the finish line in first or second place, good for a bunch of hardware — two gold medals accompanied by a pair of silvers. × This […]

Published

on


Benny Delbaugh was part of four races at the annual District 4 Class 3A track and field championships back in May.

Remarkably, all four ended with him crossing the finish line in first or second place, good for a bunch of hardware — two gold medals accompanied by a pair of silvers.


This page requires Javascript.

Javascript is required for you to be able to read premium content. Please enable it in your browser settings.

kAm}@E @?=J 5:5 E96 C646?E $92>@<:? pC62 8C25 H:? E96 c__\>6E6C 52D9 2E E96 5:DEC:4E >66E[ 96 2=D@ 2?49@C65 2== E9C66 C6=2J E62>D — E96 cI`__[ cIc__ 2?5 cIg__ DBF25D — H9:49 7:?:D965 7:CDE[ D64@?5 2?5 D64@?5[ C6DA64E:G6=J]k^Am

kAm%96 5:DEC:4E 492>A:@? cI`__ E62> — @? H9:49 s6=32F89 H2D ;@:?65 3J {@82? $E66=6[ #J2? q:4<6CE 2?5 r92D6 !6?DJ= — D92EE6C65 E96 AC6G:@FD >66E C64@C5 3J ?62C=J 2 7F== D64@?5 H:E9 2 3=:DE6C:?8 E:>6 @7 c`]df D64@?5D[ 2=D@ 2 AC@8C2> C64@C5]k^Am

kAms6=32F89’D 677@CED 2E E92E >66E 2=@?6 H6C6 6?@F89 E@ A@D:E:@? 9:>D6=7 H6== H:E9:? 2 G6CJ E2=6?E65 7:6=5 7@C %96 }6HD\xE6>’D |2=6 %C24< 2?5 u:6=5 pE9=6E6 @7 E96 *62C 2H2C5]k^Am

kAmp A2:C @7 7:7E9\A=246 7:?:D96D 😕 E96 c__ 2?5 cI`__ 2E E96 DE2E6 492>A:@?D9:AD E96 7@==@H:?8 H66<6?5 😕 $9:AA6?D3FC8 D@=:5:7:65 E92E C64@8?:E:@? 7@C E96 J@F?8 >2? H9@ A=2?D E@ 6?=:DE 😕 E96 &]$] }2GJ]k^Am

kAm“x’G6 @H? q6? 7@C `d J62CD 2?5 x @H E92E :7 x 8:G6 :E E@ 9:> 😕 7C@?E[ ?@E >2?J A6@A=6 😕 E96 2C62 2C6 8@:?8 E@ 42E49 9:>[” !6?DJ= D2:5]k^Am

kAmp55:E:@?2==J[ E96 x?5:2?D’ cIc__ E62> — 4@?D:DE:?8 @7 q:4<6CE[ !6?DJ=[ r@=:? $E6:?92CE 2?5 s6=32F89 — E@@< `eE9 A=2E6 2E E96 !xpp r=2DD bp >66E]k^Am

kAms6=32F89’D CF? 😕 E96 5:DEC:4E c__ 42>6 😕 2E cg]fc D64@?5D[ >@C6 E92? 2 7F== E:4< 29625 @7 (:==:2>DA@CE’D %6G:? (:==:2>D[ E96 D64@?5\A=246 7:?:D96C]k^Am

kAms6=32F89 2=D@ H2D G:4E@C:@FD 😕 E96 c__ 2E E96 !6??DJ=G2?:2 w62CE=2?5 pE9=6E:4 r@?76C6?46 W!wprX 492>A:@?D9:AD E9:D D62D@?[ 2D H6== 2D E96 2??F2= qC6D=:? x?G:E2E:@?2= 2E |@F?E r2C>6=]k^Am

kAmw6 H2D 9@?@C65 3J E96 4@?76C6?46 7@FC E:>6D 😕 E96 6?5\@7\D62D@? 2H2C5D[ @? E96 s:G:D:@? x 7:CDE E62> 7@C E96 c__ 2?5 cI`__[ D64@?5 E62> 7@C cIg__ 2?5 2? 9@?@C23=6 >6?E:@? 7@C E96 cI`__]k^Am

kAm{:DE65 36=@H 2C6 E96 C6DE @7 %96 }6HD\xE6>’D 3@JD EC24< 2?5 7:6=5 2==\DE2CDik^Am

kAmkDEC@?8mw@3: u@CE:[ |@F?E r2C>6=[ D6?:@Ck^DEC@?8mk^Am

kAms:DEC:4E c r=2DD ap 492>A:@? 😕 EC:A=6 ;F>A[ `cE9 A=246 😕 ;2G6=:? E9C@H 2?5 `cE9 A=246 😕 D9@E AFE ]]] !xpp 7@FCE9 A=246 😕 EC:A=6 ;F>A ]]] !wpr 6:89E9 A=246 😕 EC:A=6 ;F>A[ ?:?E9 A=246 😕 ;2G6=:? E9C@H 2?5 `cE9 A=246 😕 =@?8 ;F>A ]]] !wpr\xxx 7:CDE E62> 😕 EC:A=6 ;F>A 2?5 9@?@C23=6 >6?E:@? 7@C ;2G6=:? E9C@H]k^Am

kAmkDEC@?8mtE92? #665[ $@FE96C? r@=F>3:2[ ;F?:@Ck^DEC@?8mk^Am

kAms:DEC:4E c r=2DD ap 492>A:@? 😕 ;2G6=:? E9C@H 2?5 `_E9 A=246 😕 5:D4FD E9C@H ]]] !xpp 7@FCE9 A=246 😕 ;2G6=:? E9C@H ]]] !wpr 7:7E9 A=246 😕 ;2G6=:? E9C@H 2?5 a_E9 A=246 WE:6X 😕 5:D4FD E9C@H ]]] #2? 2 =68 @7 cIc__ C6=2J E92E 7:?:D965 7@FCE9 2E 3@E9 5:DEC:4ED 2?5 !wprD 2?5 a_E9 2E DE2E6D ]]] !wpr\xxx 7:CDE E62> 😕 ;2G6=:? E9C@H 2?5 9@?@C23=6 >6?E:@? 7@C cIc__]k^Am

kAmkDEC@?8m{@82? $E66=6[ $92>@<:?[ D@A9@>@C6k^DEC@?8mk^Am

kAms:DEC:4E c r=2DD bp 492>A:@? 😕 =@?8 ;F>A 2?5 A@=6 G2F=E WE:6X[ CF??6C\FA 😕 `__ ]]] !xpp adE9 A=246 😕 `__ 2?5 agE9 A=246 😕 =@?8 ;F>A ]]] !wpr CF??6C\FA WE:6X 😕 A@=6 G2F=E ]]] #2? 2 =68 @7 cI`__ C6=2J E92E H@? 5:DEC:4E 2?5 !wpr E:E=6D 2?5 A=2465 7:7E9 2E DE2E6D ]]] !wpr\x 7:CDE E62> 😕 cI`__ 2?5 9@?@C23=6 >6?E:@? 7@C =@?8 ;F>A]k^Am

kAmkDEC@?8mq=2<6 w@4<6?3C@49[ $92>@<:?[ D6?:@Ck^DEC@?8mk^Am

kAms:DEC:4E c r=2DD bp 492>A:@? 😕 5:D4FD E9C@H 2?5 7:7E9 A=246 😕 D9@E AFE ]]] !xpp D6G6?E9 A=246 😕 5:D4FD E9C@H ]]] !wpr CF??6C\FA 😕 5:D4FD E9C@H ]]] !wpr\x 7:CDE E62> 😕 5:D4FD E9C@H]k^Am

kAmkDEC@?8m+2<6> r=:?E@?[ $92>@<:?[ ;F?:@Ck^DEC@?8mk^Am

kAms:DEC:4E c r=2DD bp 492>A:@? 😕 D9@E AFE 2?5 ?:?E9 A=246 😕 ;2G6=:? E9C@H ]]] !xpp `fE9 A=246 😕 D9@E AFE ]]] !wpr\x 7:CDE E62> 😕 D9@E AFE]k^Am

kAmkDEC@?8mr92D6 !6?DJ=[ $92>@<:?[ D6?:@Ck^DEC@?8mk^Am

kAms:DEC:4E c r=2DD bp CF??6C\FA 😕 9:89 ;F>A 2?5 E9:C5 A=246 😕 a__ ]]] !wpr 492>A:@? 😕 a__ ]]] #2? 2 =68 @7 cI`__ C6=2J E92E H@? 5:DEC:4E 2?5 !wpr E:E=6D 2?5 A=2465 7:7E9 2E DE2E6D ]]] #2? 2 =68 @7 cIc__ C6=2J E92E A=2465 D64@?5 2E 5:DEC:4ED 2?5 `eE9 2E DE2E6D ]]] !wpr\x 7:CDE E62> 7@C a__ 2?5 cI`__ 2?5 9@?@C23=6 >6?E:@? 7@C 9:89 ;F>A 2?5 cIc__]k^Am

kAmkDEC@?8m#J2? q:4<6CE[ $92>@<:?[ D@A9@>@C6k^DEC@?8mk^Am

kAms:DEC:4E c r=2DD bp CF??6C\FA 😕 a__ 2?5 6?E6C65 `__ 2D E@A D665 367@C6 72=D6 DE2CE ]]] !wpr 492>A:@? 😕 `__ ]]] #2? 2 =68 @7 cI`__ C6=2J E92E H@? 5:DEC:4E 2?5 !wpr E:E=6D 2?5 A=2465 7:7E9 2E DE2E6D ]]] #2? 2 =68 @7 cIc__ C6=2J E92E A=2465 D64@?5 2E 5:DEC:4ED 2?5 `eE9 2E DE2E6D ]]] !wpr\x 7:CDE E62> 7@C `__ 2?5 cI`__ 2?5 9@?@C23=6 >6?E:@? 7@C a__ 2?5 cIc__]k^Am

kAmkDEC@?8myF56 @F?E r2C>6=[ D@A9@>@C6k^DEC@?8mk^Am

kAms:DEC:4E c r=2DD ap 7:7E9 A=246 😕 EC:A=6 ;F>A 2?5 D6G6?E9 A=246 😕 3@E9 =@?8 ;F>A 2?5 ;2G6=:? E9C@H ]]] !wpr 7:7E9 A=246 😕 EC:A=6 ;F>A[ D:IE9 A=246 😕 =@?8 ;F>A 2?5 a`DE A=246 😕 ;2G6=:? E9C@H ]]] !wprxxx D64@?5 E62> 😕 EC:A=6 ;F>A 2?5 9:89 ;F>A 2?5 9@?@C23=6 >6?E:@? 7@C =@?8 ;F>A]k^Am

kAmkDEC@?8mq:==J #:D96=[ 8FJ6?[ |@F?E r2C>6=[ D6?:@Ck^DEC@?8mk^Am

kAms:DEC:4E c r=2DD ap 7@FCE9 A=246 😕 “_ 9FC5=6D 2?5 `bE9 A=246 😕 b__ 9FC5=6D ]]] !wpr `_E9 A=246 😕 “_ 9FC5=6D 2?5 “E9 A=246 😕 b__ 9FC5=6D ]]] !wpr\xxx 7:CDE E62> 😕 “_ 9FC5=6D 2?5 D64@?5 E62> 7@C b__ 9FC5=6D]k^Am



Link

Continue Reading

Sports

Assistant Athletic Athletics (Track/Field & Cross Country) in Brookings, SD for South Dakota State University

Details Posted: 02-Jul-25 Location: Brookings, South Dakota Type: Full-time Salary: $44,000-$50,000 Categories: Sports Medicine Sports Medicine – Athletic Training Sector: Collegiate Sports Required Education: 4 Year Degree South Dakota State University (SDSU) is seeking an Assistant Athletic Trainer to join our team. This role supports the coordination of athletic training services, ensuring the health and […]

Published

on


Details

Posted: 02-Jul-25

Location: Brookings, South Dakota

Type: Full-time

Salary: $44,000-$50,000

Categories:

Sports Medicine

Sports Medicine – Athletic Training

Sector:

Collegiate Sports

Required Education:

4 Year Degree

South Dakota State University (SDSU) is seeking an Assistant Athletic Trainer to join our team. This role supports the coordination of athletic training services, ensuring the health and well-being of our student-athletes. From injury prevention and evaluation to rehabilitation and return-to-play management, this position plays a vital role in keeping athletes performing at their best. We’re looking for someone who is passionate about sports medicine and thrives in a team environment. This position is located in Brookings, South Dakota and is a 12-month, full-time, benefits-eligible position.

MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS:

  • Bachelor’s degree in Athletic Training, Athletic Administration or Sports Science completed by appointment date;
  • At least one year of experience with intercollegiate athletics or clinical setting (an equivalent combination will be considered);
  • Effective communication (oral, written, and interpersonal) skills;
  • BOC certification for athletic training and CPR/First Aid certification or ability to obtain these certificates by employment;
  • Demonstrated organization and time management skills; and
  • Demonstrated computer application skills.

 PREFERRED QUALIFICATIONS:

  • Master’s degree in Athletic Training, Kinesiology, Sports Medicine, Exercise Science, or Administration;
  • At least one year of experience supervising athletic training students;
  • Division I intercollegiate experience;
  • Experience providing athletic training services to the sport of track/field and cross country;
  • Eligible for state license in South Dakota;
  • Experience with team travel responsibilities;
  • Experience with supply ordering/monitoring;
  • Knowledge and/or understanding of medical records following HIPAA, FERPA and Sportsware; and
  • Knowledge and/or understanding of medical insurance.

APPLICATION DEADLINE: 

Position is open until filled with full consideration given to applications received by 07/11/2025.

For questions on the position, contact search committee chair, Holly VanVlymen at 605-688-5308 or via email: Holly-VanVlymen@sdstate.edu.

Employer Logo

About South Dakota State University

South Dakota State University is the state’s largest, most comprehensive university with more than 200 academic programs, an enrollment of approximately 12,000 students, and over $60 million annual research expenditures.

South Dakota State University offers a rich academic experience in an environment of inclusion and access through inspired, student-centered education, creative activities and research, innovation and engagement that improve the quality of life in South Dakota, the region, the nation, and the world. Its employees embrace the university’s core values of being people-centered, expanding knowledge through creativity, embracing organizational and personal integrity, commitment to diversity of thought, and excellence through continuous improvement.

As the state’s 1862 Morrill Act land-grant institution, the work of South Dakota State University is carried out on its main resident campus in Brookings, at sites in Sioux Falls, Pierre, Rapid City, and Aberdeen, and through Extension offices and Agricultural Experiment Station research sites across South Dakota.

Jackrabbits Athletics competes as an NCAA Division I member with membership in the Missouri Valley Football Conference, the Summit League and the Big 12 for wrestling.

Brookings is home to approximately 24,000 residents and is located 60 miles north of Sioux Falls and 200 miles west of Minneapolis. Brookings is listed as an ideal community for families, students, young professionals, and retirees, and is rated among the safest and most vibrant cities in South Dakota.

The Brookings Public School District educates approximately 3,300 K-12 students and ranks among the state’s highest academic achieving school districts. The district includes three elementary schools, an intermediate school for fourth and fifth grade, one middle school, and a high school.

The city also boasts an abundance of attractions and activities, including the Children’s Museum of South Dakota, Dakota Nature Park, South Dakota Art Museum, McCrory Gardens, South Dakota Agricultural Heritage Museum, Outdoor Adventure Center, and the Brookings Summer Arts Festival.

Show more

Show less


Connections working at South Dakota State University



Link

Continue Reading

Sports

State College’s champion javelin thrower Nathan Haas named to the New Balance Outdoor Nationals All-American Team | Centre County Gazette

STATE COLLEGE — Recent State College Area High School graduate Nathan Haas just added another milestone to his long list of achievements as a Little Lion football player and track and field athlete. Haas, who holds seven varsity letters from his career at SC in football and track and field, is presently the Mid-Penn Conference […]

Published

on


STATE COLLEGE — Recent State College Area High School graduate Nathan Haas just added another milestone to his long list of achievements as a Little Lion football player and track and field athlete.

Haas, who holds seven varsity letters from his career at SC in football and track and field, is presently the Mid-Penn Conference Javelin and Discus Champion and he is a three-time District 6 Discus Champion and two-time D6 Javelin Champion.

He is also a four-time PIAA Medalist, and he recently capped his track and field career by winning the 2025 PIAA State Javelin Championship.

Competing in the PIAA Meet at Shippensburg University, Haas and Whitehall High School’s Thomas Lloyd were neck-and-neck going into the final, sixth attempt when Haas unleashed his best effort of the day: 204 feet, 4 inches.

Lloyd, who actually went into the final attempt leading with a throw of 202 feet, 2 inches, still had to throw but his attempt was just under 190 feet and Haas took the Gold Medal.

Talon Romance was third with a mark of 198-7.

Nathan Haas finished his college recruiting by committing to Liberty University in Virginia to continue in track and field. Submitted photo

The State Championship, along with other parameters, qualified Haas for the New Balance Outdoor Nationals held on Thursday, June 19, through Sunday, June 22, at Franklin Field in Philadelphia.

Haas traveled to the New Balance Meet with his father, Steve, and was later joined by other members of his family. He was entered into both the javelin and discus competitions.

In the discus competition, there were 51 place winners and Haas finished 30th with a throw of 170-3.

First Place went to Benjamin Shue from Bergen Catholic HS in New Jersey with a throw of 199-1 and Second Place went to Max Martin of Tatnall HS in Delaware with a 196-11.

In javelin, Haas gained his All-America Medal with a sixth-place throw of 197-10. The top six finishers in every category were named to the All-American Teams.

Markos Hantsoulis from Highland Park in New Jersey was First Place with a 203-1 while Landen Cruz was Second Place with a 202-9.

This was Haas’ second trip to the New Balance Nationals. In 2024, he finished in ninth place in the javelin.

On the State College football team in his senior year, Haas was a starter at defensive end, and he was named to the First Team Mid Penn Conference Defense. 

In discus, he was the top American finisher in the 2025 Penn Relays (third overall), and he finished seventh in the state as a sophomore and fifth as a junior.

He finished his college recruiting by committing to Liberty University in Virginia to continue in track and field.

“The State meet was definitely the meet that I had been training for all year,” Haas said, “and what honestly got me the result I wanted was just doing it for something bigger than myself and thinking about the team every single time I went up to the runway.

“And I definitely wouldn’t have been able to do it without my coaches who were right with me on the other side of the fence the whole time.

“Going to Nationals was really tough since it was about a month after states and training had died down with graduation and other senior activities. But I really felt good and made sure I stuck to my routines and got in some practice sessions when I could.

“Honestly, I did have a rough competition with the heat and other factors I couldn’t control getting to me and I struggled to get a big throw. But I was extremely grateful to have gotten All-American to end my senior season and boost me into my college career.”



Link

Continue Reading

Most Viewed Posts

Trending