Until Saturday Newsletter 🏈 | This is The Athletic’s college football newsletter. Sign up here to receive Until Saturday directly in your inbox.

Today in college football news, I’ve just been handed a tube of Pringles that are apparently Los Calientes Verde Pringles. This tube’s minutes are numbered.

Business: Trump involvement emerges as House settlement nears

Promise this is going somewhere:

1. “President Trump said on Sunday that he wanted federal law enforcement agencies to work on restoring Alcatraz, now a museum, to a functioning maximum-security prison.”
2. “The president’s sudden push … came just hours after a South Florida PBS station aired the 1979 classic film ‘Escape from Alcatraz.’ The president spent the past weekend at his Mar-a-Lago resort, which is located in Palm Beach.”

Inspiration can strike swiftly, is the point. Another example:

Three days prior, Nick Saban met with Trump in Tuscaloosa. Saban reportedly told Trump that modern player compensation has resulted in college athletics having an uneven playing field. (Saban, whose annual Alabama salaries at times surpassed those of every MAC head coach combined, also raised a similar complaint a year earlier when discussing his own retirement.)

After that chat with Saban, Trump is reportedly interested in an executive order meant to address payments to athletes. It’s unclear how (or whether) that might work:

“A congressional aide told The Athletic that an executive order might not stabilize the college sports system, which requires legal certainty and a limited safe harbor from litigation. Legal protections and the pre-empting of state NIL laws can only be addressed through congressional legislation. … Numerous bills and drafts have been introduced, announced or floated. … None of the bills has gone anywhere yet.”

Meanwhile, the House v. NCAA settlement remains close to approval. By allowing schools to set aside $20.5 million for their rosters, it’d provide far more compensation for the labor most responsible for college sports being a multi-billion-dollar industry.

But what about Saban’s worry of the playing field becoming even more uneven than the one he totally dominated? Sure, it’d arguably become even more uneven than ever before, with plenty of smaller schools having nowhere near $20.5 million to spend. So … is House itself now a target as well?

Either way, the settlement is tenuously nearing completion. As the carefully constructed stack of paperwork teeters, at least one side doesn’t appreciate the surprise gust of wind:

“An attorney representing current and former college athletes in the proposed $2.8. billion House vs. NCAA settlement said a potential executive order on the issue of NIL in college sports would be ‘unmerited and unhelpful’ and criticized Saban’s ‘eleventh-hour self importance.’”

Stay tuned. Likely to be a House update of some sort later this week, actually.

Quick Snaps

C’mon, Michigan: Might as well think big with Moore suspension

Some news from yesterday, via Michigan reporter Austin Meek:

“Michigan is expected to suspend coach Sherrone Moore for two games as a penalty for allegedly deleting text messages he exchanged with Connor Stalions, the former Michigan staffer at the center of an NCAA investigation into allegations of advanced scouting.

“Moore is expected to coach the first two games, including a Week 2 matchup against Oklahoma, his alma mater, before missing games against Central Michigan and Nebraska in Week 3 and Week 4, a source briefed on Michigan’s plans confirmed.”

While the broader NCAA investigation into Michigan will next include a Committee of Infractions hearing, likely this summer, I’m more interested in which games Moore is expected to miss. Why devote full strength to the home opener against New Mexico, which could be a five-touchdown underdog, rather than the road trip to Nebraska, a likely tough Big Ten opponent?

I asked Austin for his thoughts. He said:

“It’s a pick-your-punishment situation for Michigan: Suspend Moore for the first two games and force him to miss his homecoming against Oklahoma or suspend him for weeks 3 and 4 and force him to miss Michigan’s Big Ten opener at Nebraska. One way or the other, he’d have to miss a big game … unless Michigan decided to suspend him for the opener against New Mexico and the Week 3 game against Central Michigan, which would be pretty brazen, even for Michigan.”

Sure, giving Moore such a carefully measured suspension would probably make Michigan look less remorseful to the NCAA — and thus partly defeat the whole purpose. But Michigan’s already done the suspend-the-head-coach-for-consecutive-games thing (for two stints of Jim Harbaugh’s final season, when Moore led six victories during a national title run). Let’s have some fun by picking and choosing.