Connect with us

NIL

NIL legislation advances, has exemption for public records laws

(The Center Square) – Authorization of sports agents to sign North Carolina’s collegiate athletes for “name, image, and likeness” contracts used in product endorsements is in legislation approved Wednesday by a committee of the state Senate. Authorize NIL Agency Contracts, known also as Senate Bill 229, is headed to the Rules Committee after gaining favor in […]

Published

on

NIL legislation advances, has exemption for public records laws

(The Center Square) – Authorization of sports agents to sign North Carolina’s collegiate athletes for “name, image, and likeness” contracts used in product endorsements is in legislation approved Wednesday by a committee of the state Senate.

Authorize NIL Agency Contracts, known also as Senate Bill 229, is headed to the Rules Committee after gaining favor in the Judiciary Committee. It would likely next get a full floor vote.

Last year the NCAA approved NIL contracts for players.







FNF - NC - Sen. Amy S. Galey, R-Alamance

Sen. Amy S. Galey, R-Alamance




“Athletes can benefit from NIL by endorsing products, signing sponsorship deals, engaging in commercial opportunities and monetizing their social media presence, among other avenues,” the NCAA says on its website. “The NCAA fully supports these opportunities for student-athletes across all three divisions.”

SB229 spells out the information that the agent’s contract with the athlete must include, and requires a warning to the athlete that they could lose their eligibility if they do not notify the school’s athletic director within 72 hours of signing the contract.

“Consult with your institution of higher education prior to entering into any NIL contract,” the says the warning that would be required by the legislation. “Entering into an NIL contract that conflicts with state law or your institution’s policies may have negative consequences such as loss of athletic eligibility. You may cancel this NIL agency contract with 14 days after signing it.”

The legislation also exempts the NIL contracts from being disclosed under the state’s Open Records Act when public universities review them. The state’s two ACC members from the UNC System, Carolina and N.C. State, requested the exemption.

“They are concerned about disclosure of the student-athlete contracts when private universities don’t have to disclose the student-athlete contracts,” Sen. Amy Galey, R-Alamance, told the committee. “I feel very strongly that a state university should not be put at a disadvantage at recruitment or in program management because they have disclosure requirements through state law.”

Duke and Wake Forest are the other ACC members, each a private institution.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

NIL

FSU coach Mike Norvell is a proponent of NIL enforcement in proposed Salary Cap Era of college football

Mike Norvell views the proposed salary cap and subsequent enforcement that is supposed to go into effect if and/or when the House Settlement passes as a “good thing” for college athletics. Florida State’s head coach views the idea of “checks and balances” in terms of regulating the spending on college athletes as a healthy endeavor […]

Published

on


Mike Norvell views the proposed salary cap and subsequent enforcement that is supposed to go into effect if and/or when the House Settlement passes as a “good thing” for college athletics.

Florida State’s head coach views the idea of “checks and balances” in terms of regulating the spending on college athletes as a healthy endeavor as most major college programs seem to be in unison that extra compensation via NIL should be regulated if schools are going to exceed to $20.5 million to be spread around towards all sports.

“I say, checks and balances in a sense of what those deals are. And obviously guys have to go out there and earn whatever opportunities can be provided,” Norvell told the Tampa Bay Times and other outlets during a booster stop in Tampa over the weekend. “To be able to have a little bit of an understanding through Deloitte and what they can do, it’s going to be, I think it will still be up to each football, each athletic department to where they disperse those funds. 

“I think it will bring everything to a more comparable situation based off the university. Just big picture within college athletics, I think it’ll be a good thing.”

Norvell’s reference to Deloitte is about a clearinghouse, with the major accounting firm being tasked with moderating how much Name, Image, Likeness deals should be worth and then enforcing said deals. Currently, NIL has largely been used as a way of compensating college athletes beyond of off-field value (although the intent of NIL was initially for solely off-field value).

How enforceable that is, remains to be seen. The House settlement is still being finalized, and it was reported on Monday that a CEO and new enforcement agency (beyond the NCAA) will be in place if the settlement is passed this week. The CEO of the College Sports Commission will be tasked with aspects like doling out punishments for rules violations and enforcing the salary cap.

Per a Yahoo report, the P4 programs that do not agree to be a member under the CSC would risk “the loss of conference membership and participation against other power league programs.” The state of Tennessee signed a bill earlier this month that would allow schools and their NIL collectives to “break House settlement-related rules” and “prevents college sports’ new enforcement entity from penalizing those schools” per a Yahoo report.

FSU athletic director Michael Alford has consistently voiced his understanding and support of a cap as well as NIL regulation with the House settlement presumably on the horizon. It appears that Alford and his head football coach are in unison on the matter in this ever-changing landscape of college football.



Link

Continue Reading

NIL

If Tennessee chooses state law over NIL pledge, it risks SEC expulsion

A new Tennessee law triggered the power conferences of college sports into demanding member schools like the University of Tennessee and Vanderbilt to sign a loyalty pledge over new player pay rules or face possible expulsion. Knox News confirmed the existence of the loyalty document through a source with direct knowledge of the situation. The […]

Published

on


A new Tennessee law triggered the power conferences of college sports into demanding member schools like the University of Tennessee and Vanderbilt to sign a loyalty pledge over new player pay rules or face possible expulsion.

Knox News confirmed the existence of the loyalty document through a source with direct knowledge of the situation. The source requested anonymity because those correspondence are between the conferences and member schools.

The document is being circulated by the ACC, Big 12, Big Ten and the SEC. It demands that member schools agree to follow new rules involving paying players despite state laws giving the freedom to circumvent the rules. And the pledge also requires schools to waive their right to sue the NCAA or conferences if they disagree with the implementation of those rules.

The document has not been finalized. But potential consequences of not signing it include expulsion from the conference or participation in playing games against other power conference schools.

The new Tennessee law applies to all four-year universities in the state, public and private. UT and Vanderbilt are in the SEC, one of four power conferences.

A clause in the law permits Vanderbilt and private universities to opt out of the protections of the state law in order to cooperate with the NCAA. Additionally, it appears that UT is guiding the approach of the law because of how it’s utilized lawmakers against the NCAA in the past.

University of Memphis (American Athletic Conference), Middle Tennessee State (Conference USA) and other state universities are in mid-major conferences that likely won’t require a pledge to follow the new college sports player pay rules.

For better or worse, this makes Tennessee the epicenter of another earthquake in college sports.

What University of Tennessee said about SEC threat

Expulsion from the SEC seems inconceivable for UT, a charter member since 1932. But whether it’s a legitimate threat or a negotiating tactic remains to be seen.

In a statement to Knox News, UT pledged to comply with the pending House settlement, which will create the new system for player pay, while acknowledging the need for the state law.

“The University of Tennessee has committed to following the House settlement if it is approved,” UT said in a statement. “That commitment has not changed. We appreciate the Tennessee General Assembly’s forethought in passing NIL legislation that provides future protections for student-athletes and institutions beyond the House settlement.”

Vanderbilt and the SEC did not immediately respond to a Knox News request for comment.

Threatening a loyalty pledge is a bold move by the NCAA and power conferences and, most certainly, in response to the new Tennessee law, which was signed by Gov. Bill Lee on May 1 and surfaced about two weeks later.

The law protects Tennessee universities from anticipated antitrust lawsuits by athletes and NIL collectives unhappy with the player-pay rules coming to college sports.

The new NCAA system will include a salary cap of direct school-to-player pay, roster limits, revenue sharing that challenges Title IX principles of publicly funded institutions and a clearinghouse that vets NIL contracts. It could help stabilize college sports, but lawsuits challenging those rules are expected.

If athletes, boosters or collectives sue, the new state law allows Tennessee universities to opt out of those college sports rules and shift liability toward the NCAA and conferences. It also prevents the NCAA from penalizing schools that circumvent those rules for purposes of following the law.

Only a federal law, a valid court order or antitrust exemption for college athletics can supersede Tennessee’s new law. That escape hatch for Tennessee schools sounded alarms across the college sports landscape.

How Tennessee could disrupt the new system in college sports

Opinions about Tennessee’s approach vary around college sports.

About a dozen states have enacted similar laws in the everchanging arms race of paying college athletes with few restrictions. But Tennessee’s law is believed to be the strongest and most evasive to NCAA rules and the conditions of the pending House settlement.

The timing of Tennessee’s new law is also problematic.

A new NCAA system for paying athletes could begin as early as July 1, pending the multi-billion-dollar House settlement, which resolves three federal antitrust lawsuits against the NCAA and four power conferences (ACC, Big Ten, Big 12, SEC).

That settlement could come any day now. There’s growing skepticism that it will solve the legal and structural problems in college sports, although some are cautiously optimistic that it’ll at least achieve some progress.

Opponents of the new state law believe Tennessee is nixing an effective agreement days before it’s signed by a federal judge. But proponents of the state law believe Tennessee is being proactive by keeping its legal options in anticipation of a system it believes will fail.

The most straightforward take of the situation is that Tennessee is protecting its own interests ahead of the SEC or college sports. Whether that’s a wise move or heavy handed is debatable, but it certainly got the attention of college sports leaders.

Here’s why UT wants state law for protection

Tennessee schools intend to comply with the system prescribed in the House settlement, but that plan remains hazy. UT, specifically, wants legal cover if the new rules violate antitrust law.

Here are examples of what UT fears if it’s not given liability protection by the state law.

  • A new clearinghouse will determine if NIL deals are legitimate and of fair market value. Legally, that appears to be a difficult standard to define. If an athlete or collective sues because an NIL deal is declined, UT wants the flexibility to approve the contract independent of NCAA rules or at least opt out of the system to avoid a lawsuit.
  • Lawsuits on numerous antitrust grounds are anticipated after the House settlement is approved. The NCAA, power conferences and schools could be sued. There’s no indication whether those suits would be successful. But UT doesn’t want to be among the defendants, and the state law says Tennessee schools don’t have to follow anticompetitive NCAA rules.
  • If damages are awarded in antitrust lawsuits, the state law says that Tennessee schools can’t be held responsible for paying them. Instead, the NCAA would be liable.
  • UT wants to avoid punishment from the NCAA if it opts out of rules that it finds to violate antitrust laws. If that occurs, the state law protects UT from NCAA sanctions. Notably, UT football is already on probation until July 13, 2028, as a result of the Jeremy Pruitt recruiting scandal.

Could Tennessee face another court battle?

Some college sports stakeholders believe Tennessee isn’t being a team player. But UT has reasons to distance itself from the NCAA in future lawsuits, and it has a good track record against the governing body.

They faced off in federal court in 2024 after the state of Tennessee, on behalf of UT, sued the NCAA to loosen its stringent rules over NIL benefits. UT won that battle.

On Jan. 31, 2025, the NCAA and a coalition of states led by Tennessee reached a settlement that protects student-athletes’ NIL rights during the recruiting process and prohibits the NCAA from bringing back its NIL recruiting ban.

And in 2023, Tennessee Attorney General Jonathan Skrmetti threatened to sue the NCAA if it gave the UT football team a postseason ban in the Pruitt recruiting scandal. UT also won that battle, as the NCAA relented from issuing a postseason ban.

The bad blood between UT and the NCAA can’t be ignored as a backdrop to this state law. And don’t be surprised if Skrmetti or Tennessee lawmakers get involved again if this situation escalates.

Adam Sparks is the Tennessee football beat reporter. Email adam.sparks@knoxnews.com. X, formerly known as Twitter@AdamSparks. Support strong local journalism by subscribing at knoxnews.com/subscribe.

Get the latest news and insight on SEC football by subscribing to the SEC Unfiltered newsletter, delivered straight to your inbox.





Link

Continue Reading

NIL

Former Gonzaga star Brynna Maxwell joins Eastern Washington staff as assistant coach | Eastern Washington

CHENEY, Wash. — Former Gonzaga women’s basketball standout and WNBA draftee Brynna Maxwell is joining the Eastern Washington women’s basketball staff as an assistant coach. “We are excited to have Brynna Maxwell join our crew,” EWU head coach Joddie Gleason said on X. “Thrilled to have her start her coaching journey with the Eags.” Welcome […]

Published

on


CHENEY, Wash. — Former Gonzaga women’s basketball standout and WNBA draftee Brynna Maxwell is joining the Eastern Washington women’s basketball staff as an assistant coach.

“We are excited to have Brynna Maxwell join our crew,” EWU head coach Joddie Gleason said on X. “Thrilled to have her start her coaching journey with the Eags.”

Maxwell spent two seasons with the Zags after transferring from Utah ahead of the 2022-23 season. In her final year at Gonzaga, the Gig Harbor, Washington, native started all 36 games and helped guide GU to a historic 16-0 mark in West Coast Conference play, a 32-4 overall record and a berth to the Sweet 16 of the 2023-24 NCAA Tournament.

The 6-foot guard appeared in 69 games, starting 65, and totaled 955 career points, 72 steals, 64 assists and 228 rebounds. Her performance earned back-to-back All-WCC First Team honors.

Maxwell was selected with the first pick in the second round of the 2024 WNBA Draft by the Chicago Sky but did not make the final 12-player roster.

With her playing days now over, Maxwell embarks on her coaching career close to home. She joins a staff that includes head coach Joddie Gleason, associate head coach Skip Gleason and second-year assistant coach Jamie Loera, who had a record-breaking playing career with the Eagles from 2022-24.

Last season, with a roster full of new faces, Eastern Washington finished eighth in the Big Sky Conference standings with an 11-20 overall record and a 7-11 mark in conference play. The Eags lost to Sacramento State in the first round of the Big Sky Tournament and will look to keep improving in 2025-26 with a young but talented team.





Link

Continue Reading

NIL

5 Best Players in the NCAA Transfer Portal

The NCAA transfer portal continues to shake up college basketball as top talents find new homes ahead of the upcoming season. One of the biggest moves was Boogie Fland’s commitment to the Florida Gators, a major addition for the SEC program. But with Fland off the board, which high-impact players remain available for teams still […]

Published

on

5 Best Players in the NCAA Transfer Portal


https://img.particlenews.com/image.php?url=0eZbA1_11EsZiVB00

The NCAA transfer portal continues to shake up college basketball as top talents find new homes ahead of the upcoming season. One of the biggest moves was Boogie Fland’s commitment to the Florida Gators, a major addition for the SEC program.

But with Fland off the board, which high-impact players remain available for teams still hunting for game-changers?

We’ve tracked the latest portal activity via 247 Sports Transfer Portal Tracker, and here are the five best unsigned players who could still make a big splash this offseason.

https://img.particlenews.com/image.php?url=1m0vXa_11EsZiVB00
College Sports Network’s Men’s College Basketball Transfer Portal tracks the comings and goings of every athlete who has entered the transfer portal. Find out who’s entered and where they’re going now!

Uncommitted Stars: Top 5 Still in the Transfer Portal

PJ Haggerty (Memphis)

PJ Haggerty, formerly of Memphis, is one of the most sought-after guards in the transfer portal. Ranked as the No. 1 overall transfer portal prospect by On3, Haggerty was originally a three-star recruit, but his performance at Tulsa and Memphis significantly elevated his stock.

Last season, he showcased his scoring ability, averaging 21.7 points, 5.8 rebounds, and 3.7 assists per game.

Now, Haggerty is looking to take the next big step. He wants to play as a true point guard—and he’s also eyeing a major NIL deal, reportedly around $4 million. Schools like NC State, Ole Miss, and Texas are chasing him, but Texas stands out. Their strong NIL setup could give them the edge in this heated race.

RJ Luis Jr. (St. John’s)

Meanwhile, RJ Luis Jr. has made his decision. After St. John’s suffered a tough loss to Arkansas in the NCAA Tournament, the 2025 Big East Player of the Year entered the transfer portal. But he quickly shut the door on returning to college. Luis has fully committed to the NBA Draft and says he’s “all-in” on turning pro.

Luis had a big season—he averaged 18.2 points, 7.2 rebounds, and 2.0 assists. Before his draft decision, he was one of the most wanted wings in the portal. If he had returned to school, he was expected to land at least $1.5 million in NIL deals. Now, his focus is entirely on the next level.

Jamir Watkins (Florida State)

Jamir Watkins, another major portal name, is still weighing his future. The five-star transfer originally entered the NBA Draft but is now leaning toward returning to college. At Florida State, Watkins averaged 18.4 points, 5.7 rebounds, and 2.4 assists. He’s ranked as the No. 2 small forward in the portal.

While his draft stock has recently dipped, his value in college basketball is rising. He was one of the brightest stars in the ACC last season. If he withdraws from the draft, UNC is currently the frontrunner to land him. Other schools like Louisville, Kentucky, and Illinois are also making a strong push.

Desmond Claude (USC)

Fourth, Desmond Claude is the name to watch. The former USC guard had a strong season, putting up 15.8 points, 4.2 rebounds, and 3.1 assists. He’s not just looking for a good fit—he wants a strong backcourt partner and a real shot at a deep tournament run.

Zeke Mayo (Kansas)

Finally, Zeke Mayo is the last best available player in the transfer portal. He played last season at Kansas and recently entered the transfer portal. However, he added a “Do Not Contact” tag, which means he wants to stay in Kansas but is keeping his options open.

KEEP READING: 2025 Men’s College Basketball Transfer Portal Tracker

This is because his NCAA eligibility is still uncertain and is awaiting a decision. Last season, Mayo showed a strong performance, averaging 14.6 points, 4.8 rebounds, and 2.9 assists per game. We expect him to return to Kansas instead of transferring to another school if he receives the extra year of eligibility.

College Sports Network has you covered with the latest news, analysis, insights, and trending stories in college football, men’s college basketball, women’s college basketball, and college baseball!

Continue Reading

NIL

The Front Runner

“To give anything less than your best is to sacrifice the gift.” “It’s not who’s the best—it’s who can take the most pain.” “Somebody may beat me, but they are going to have to bleed to do it.” These are just three of many memorable quotes by Steve Prefontaine that encapsulate the long-distance runner’s relentless […]

Published

on

The Front Runner

“To give anything less than your best is to sacrifice the gift.”

“It’s not who’s the best—it’s who can take the most pain.”

“Somebody may beat me, but they are going to have to bleed to do it.”

These are just three of many memorable quotes by Steve Prefontaine that encapsulate the long-distance runner’s relentless spirit. Fierce, outspoken, and stubborn, Pre pushed the boundaries of the sport not with record-breaking times but also with his manner of winning, giving every race a maximal effort. He competed in the 5,000-meter event at the 1972 Summer Olympics in Munich and held the American record in every distance from 2,000 to 10,000 meters between 1973 and 1975. He was the first track athlete to sign with Nike, setting a precedent for brand deals. He played a significant role in popularizing the sport, his charismatic style and bravado drawing thousands of fans to the bleachers.

And then, on May 30, 1975, at only 24, Pre’s life was cut short in a car crash.

Five decades after the tragedy, his legacy still inspires runners all around the world. Brendan O’Meara’s new book, The Front Runner, offers a contemporary retelling of Pre’s meteoric rise to fame. Just ahead of the book’s launch, the author and host of The Creative Nonfiction podcast shared with Runner’s World why he decided to write the biography and why Pre remains one of America’s most iconic runners.

Mariner Books “The Front Runner: The Life of Steve Prefontaine” by Brendan O’Meara

“The Front Runner: The Life of Steve Prefontaine” by Brendan O’Meara

Now 11% Off

So much has been written about Pre already. How is your book different?

My book recasts him in a modern light. What’s going on with name, image, and likeness in college sports really reflects what he was dealing with in the early 70s, trying to be compensated. Pre was very forward-thinking and trying to fight for athlete empowerment and rights at a time when athletes had little power—or didn’t realize how much power they actually did have—because of the amateur establishment of the day. Mike O’Hara launched the International Track Association in 1973 as a real professional track, but if athletes signed with ITA, they were no longer amateurs and couldn’t run in the Olympics, and a lot of them felt very conflicted. So that’s kind of the world-building aspect that helped inform this particular Prefontaine story.

I was able to find a couple of hundred people who overlapped with him, and a lot of them never spoke on the record. I went digging into what made Pre tick, to get to the man behind the myth because he’s been so lionized and deified. I wanted to write something more intimate.

What surprised you while reporting the story?

Pre has been characterized as very confident and brash. It was great to get a sense of how insecure he was at times, how much pressure he put on himself, which hasn’t been articulated very well in the past. He wanted to break 4 minutes in the mile at the Coos County Meet during his senior year. The mile was his white whale for the longest time. Close to 2,000 people were jammed in to watch from Coos Bay. He ran 4:06:09, amazing time. But his friend, Ron Apling, found Steve behind the stands crying after the race. Ron asked, ‘What’s the matter, Steve?’ And Steve said: ‘They all came to watch me break 4 minutes, and I failed them.’ He realized he was such a draw and would come to see himself as an artist, a performer.

Something else that surprised me was Pre coaching women, Mary Decker, Debbie Roth, and Caroline Walker. Just on his own time because he wanted to help. He was just counseling people in the community, writing them workouts in the same vein that his high school coaches Walt McClure and Phil Persian wrote for him.

steve prefontaine

RW Archives

What are some timeless lessons from Pre’s approach to training?

In that era, it was to pound you to death with miles, and if you couldn’t withstand that mileage, you just weren’t cut out for it. But Bill Bowerman, head track coach at the University of Oregon, had a credo that it’s better to undertrain than overtrain an athlete. Bowerman and his assistant coach Bill Dellinger, both Steve’s college coaches, were very much ahead of the game in that regard, and I think that’s very applicable today.

Pre was on the vanguard of sports psychology, of goal setting. There’s a great image in Geoff Hollister’s book about him trying to get to the sub-4 in the mile and break 9 minutes in 2 miles. Writing it down was his way of trying to manifest it as best as possible. It gave him a better sense and a crystallized vision that if you thought about it and visualized it enough, you might be able to get there.

What part of the book was the hardest to write?

Pre’s final day on the planet, trying to track every step of the way and making sure it tracks with the police and other reports. I wanted to handle that scene with care and fairness, lay it out without judgment, just paint the scene. Pre always felt so alive to me, and then I’d think, ‘Oh my god, he’s gonna die.’ Through my rewriting and research, I’d go through a different archive, and he’d come alive to me again, feel so vibrant, and as I’d be getting closer to 1975, I’d think, ‘He’s gonna die again.’ It’d be a gut punch for me.

ncaa photos archive

NCAA Photos//Getty Images

Is there anything you wish had made it into the book but was cut?

One scene I was sad to see go was from the 1972 indoor season. The Los Angeles Times did a split prediction and split column with Harley Tinkham, their track and field writer. They had an astrologer, Burton Morse, predict the outcome of the races based on the runners’ birth signs and all that stuff. Morse said that the stars weren’t in Prefontaine’s favor. It was just so wild that in 1972, when track and field was so popular, and Pre was an ascendant Olympian, and Jim Ryun was trying to reclaim his fame, they’d take their track expert and pit him up against an astrologer. In the Sports Illustrated article, where I read about it, they cleaned up the language. But Pre pretty much said, ‘Fuck the stars.’


Have you speculated about what would happen if Pre lived and his career went on? Where would he end up?

I think he’d have just gone on to be a tremendous ambassador for track and field, especially being Nike’s firstborn and athlete. Some of his friends said he’d have gone into politics, born with the wild charisma he had. So many people said, ‘He just had it.’ He had magnetism about him. He would have been a tremendous leader and champion.

american runner steve prefontaine at olympic games trials

Bettmann//Getty Images

How is Pre still such a household name in running? Why does he matter in 2025?

It was something cosmic. A sport only has so many inflection points. Track and field was ready for a change. Pre had the look, the moxy, the talent. He had Bowerman and he had Nike. And it was just a moment. He was the catalyst, ready to ride that rocketship. There have been far more talented and charismatic people who shattered world records since, but they don’t inspire us or fire us up the way Steve did. That’s why he’ll probably forever tower over track and field.

This interview has been edited for length and clarity.

Mariner Books “The Front Runner: The Life of Steve Prefontaine” by Brendan O’Meara

“The Front Runner: The Life of Steve Prefontaine” by Brendan O’Meara

Now 11% Off

Headshot of Pavlína Černá

Pavlína Černá, an RRCA-certified run coach and cycling enthusiast, has been with Runner’s World, Bicycling, and Popular Mechanics since August 2021. When she doesn’t edit, she writes; when she doesn’t write, she reads or translates. In whatever time she has left, you can find her outside running, riding, or roller-skating to the beat of one of the many audiobooks on her TBL list.

Continue Reading

NIL

Zakai Zeigler, a former UT basketball player, sues NCAA to play for a fifth year and collect NIL compensation

Zeigler’s lawsuit requests a preliminary injunction to let him compete in the upcoming season while pursuing graduate studies. KNOXVILLE, Tenn. — A popular former University of Tennessee basketball player filed a lawsuit Tuesday, aiming to keep his eligibility to play for an additional year while collecting compensation for his name, image and likeness while pursuing […]

Published

on


Zeigler’s lawsuit requests a preliminary injunction to let him compete in the upcoming season while pursuing graduate studies.

KNOXVILLE, Tenn. — A popular former University of Tennessee basketball player filed a lawsuit Tuesday, aiming to keep his eligibility to play for an additional year while collecting compensation for his name, image and likeness while pursuing his graduate degree. 

Zakai Zeigler said he is hoping to compete in his fifth year of college basketball and argued that he has a five-year eligibility window, despite already graduating from UT’s undergraduate program. The lawsuit argues that an “arbitrary” National Collegiate Athletic Association rule limits student-athletes to participating in four seasons of competition.

The lawsuit argues that many other student-athletes compete during their fifth year of eligibility and earn compensation for their name, image and likeness while playing. The lawsuit said Zeigler’s NIL valuation for the 2025-2026 season ranges between $2 million and $4 million.

It said if he had been barred from playing for a single year through the NCAA redshirt system, he would still be eligible to play now, and argued that through the system, the NCAA ultimately gets to decide if student-athletes have the chance to play during their fifth year of eligibility instead of the student-athletes themselves.

“But, because Zeigler participated in athletics for four consecutive years, the NCAA bars him from representing his school in interscholastic competition in the fifth year of the competition window—and thereby excludes him from the market for NIL compensation,” the lawsuit said.

Typically, “redshirted” student-athletes have the chance to sit out for a year, but still maintain their four-year eligibility. These kinds of student-athletes are usually still allowed to practice with the team, receive academic scholarships and financial aid, attend class or train with a coach. The system is meant to give student-athletes a chance to recover from injuries, improve their GPA or sharpen their skills, according to North Central College.

The lawsuit also claims the NCAA’s rule violates the Sherman Act, constituting an “unreasonable restraint of trade” because when student-athletes’ eligibility ends, they are effectively locked out of the NIL market.

“For Zeigler specifically, his NIL earning potential in a fifth year of eligibility would substantially exceed his current earning potential due to his established performance record and name recognition,” the lawsuit said. “By restricting Zeigler’s participation in this market through an arbitrary limitation on player eligibility, the NCAA directly impacts his ability to compete in the commercial marketplace.”

It also argues that effectively undoing the four-season rule would further the NCAA’s academic mission.

Zeigler graduated this week after completing UT’s retail and merchandising management undergraduate program. While studying and playing with the Tennessee basketball team, he also partnered with at least one local law firm for promotional content.

Garza Law Firm sponsored his sold-out “I AM G.I.A.N.T. Basketball Camp” in April 2025. He also appeared in a video promoting the law firm. Zeigler is represented by Litson PLLC and the Garza Law Firm.

The lawsuit asks for a 12-person jury to review the case, and for a judgment that the NCAA’s four-season rule violates the Sherman Act, as well as the Tennessee Trade Practices Act. It also asks for a preliminary and permanent injunction keeping the NCAA from enforcing the rule against Zeigler, allowing him to compete next season.

WBIR reached out to the NCAA for comment on the lawsuit.

Tennessee basketball has 12 out of 13 scholarship players on the 2025-26 roster. 



Link

Continue Reading

Most Viewed Posts

Trending