Connect with us

Technology

OsteoCentric Technologies Announces Formation of UnifiMI Industrial Companies

AUSTIN, Texas, May 1, 2025 /PRNewswire/ — OsteoCentric Technologies, a global leader in innovative fastener technologies, announced the creation of seven wholly-owned subsidiaries dedicated to penetrating key industrial market segments including Aerospace & Defense, Transportation, Construction, Oil & Gas, Automotive, Agriculture, and Sporting Goods. This strategic move leverages the company’s proprietary UnifiMI® Fastener Technology to […]

Published

on


AUSTIN, Texas, May 1, 2025 /PRNewswire/ — OsteoCentric Technologies, a global leader in innovative fastener technologies, announced the creation of seven wholly-owned subsidiaries dedicated to penetrating key industrial market segments including Aerospace & Defense, Transportation, Construction, Oil & Gas, Automotive, Agriculture, and Sporting Goods. This strategic move leverages the company’s proprietary UnifiMI® Fastener Technology to address some of the most critical challenges, across the most demanding industrial applications.

“Our invention of the UnifiMI implant-to-bone interface, the world’s first Minimally Invasive Surgery (MIS) Bone Preservation technology, disrupted the medical device industry by accelerating the healing journey for orthopedic and dental patients. Our industrial team, led by Nick Medendorp, will leverage ten years of development and $200M investment in UnifiMI medical applications to address fixation problems across the entire industrial complex,” said Eric Brown, Founder and CEO of OsteoCentric Technologies & UnifiMI Industrial Companies.

UnifiMI Industrial Companies aim to deliver high-quality, high-performance, customizable fastening solutions by utilizing advanced techniques and fostering collaborative partnerships with industry leaders. UnifiMI® Fastener Technology represents a paradigm shift in fastening solutions designed to address critical application challenges such as vibrational loosening, material preservation, and stress management.

“Combined with our comprehensive experience, principles of substrate preservation, and our patented interlocking thread form, UnifiMI is well positioned for continued optimization. By extending our proven UnifiMI® Fastener Technology into industrial market segments and tailoring for widescale applications, we are poised to offer innovative solutions that allow for lasting mechanical integration, energy management and load-sharing stress distribution, while ensuring safety, reliability, and performance,” said Nick Medendorp, President UnifiMI Industrial Companies.

For more information about the UnifiMI industrial companies and their innovative fastening solutions, please visit www.unifimi.com.

About UnifiMI Industrial Companies
Founded in 2024, with global headquarters in Austin, Texas and development center in Logan, Utah, UnifiMI Industrial is dedicated to understanding the unique needs of its customers and markets. Active collaboration with customers, suppliers, and employees is central to UnifiMI Industrial’s approach, ensuring added value and optimal outcomes for all stakeholders.

SOURCE OsteoCentric Technologies



Link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Technology

Senator presses Digital Childhood Alliance on tech industry ties

Nolan McKendry | The Center Square (The Center Square) – Debate on age verification for internet apps exposed the growing scrutiny of outside influence on Louisiana policymaking. Republican Sens. Jay Morris of West Monroe and Kim Carver of Bossier City are seeking the right language for Carver’s bill. In a Finance Committee hearing of the […]

Published

on


Nolan McKendry | The Center Square

(The Center Square) – Debate on age verification for internet apps exposed the growing scrutiny of outside influence on Louisiana policymaking.

Republican Sens. Jay Morris of West Monroe and Kim Carver of Bossier City are seeking the right language for Carver’s bill. In a Finance Committee hearing of the state Senate, Morris pressed to no avail the executive director of the Digital Childhood Alliance to disclose which tech companies fund the organization.

“There’s not enough attention on the real risks that these proposals create,” Kareem Ghanem, Google’s director of public policy, said in an interview with The Center Square. “These bills would do nothing to address people’s concerns. And in the process, they’re letting Zuckerberg and Meta off the hook by providing this false sense of security that no amount of age verification at an app store level can really solve.”

Texas Gov. Greg Abbott has already signed an age-verification law nearly identical to Carver’s proposal. The Louisiana bill under consideration aims to require stricter age verification mechanisms for apps and online platforms accessible to minors. Google and Apple would have to verify age before users can download applications, such as Facebook, under terms of Carver’s bill. Google opposes these efforts.

Casey Stefanski, in response to Morris, declined to provide specifics beyond naming the father of the Digital Childhood Alliance’s founder as its largest donor and acknowledging that Meta supports the legislation the group is promoting.

“I don’t feel comfortable with answering these questions,” Stefanski told the committee. “We’ve been working on this legislation prior to Meta even caring about it.”

Stefanski testified that her organization paid attorneys to draft the model legislation and has met with companies like Google in pursuit of broader industry support.

Pressing Stefanski for a yes-or-no answer on whether tech companies provide funding to the DCA, she eventually confirmed that they do but refused to name them.

When asked whether DCA is a 501(c)(3) or 501(c)(4) organization, Stefanski responded that it is a 501(c)(4) − a nonprofit category that allows for political advocacy without disclosing donors.

“So, you’re not going to tell us who’s actually supporting it?” Morris asked.

“No,” Stefanski replied.

The moment prompted intervention from Carver seeking to clarify that the legislation’s intent is not to let any tech company off the hook for age verification requirements.

“I appreciate your line of questioning,” Carver told Morris. “And I want you to know as the bill’s author, I have not wanted to absolve any app − not Meta, not anyone − from doing age verification.”

Morris countered that Carver’s current amendment to the bill may have that effect, though Carver offered to work on clarifying the language.





Link

Continue Reading

Technology

AP Technology SummaryBrief at 12:02 a.m. EDT | National News

Judge wrestles with far-reaching remedy proposals in US antitrust case against Google WASHINGTON (AP) — The fate and fortunes of one of the world’s most powerful tech companies is now in the hands of a U.S. judge wrestling with whether to impose far-reaching changes upon Google in the wake of its dominant search engine being […]

Published

on


Judge wrestles with far-reaching remedy proposals in US antitrust case against Google

WASHINGTON (AP) — The fate and fortunes of one of the world’s most powerful tech companies is now in the hands of a U.S. judge wrestling with whether to impose far-reaching changes upon Google in the wake of its dominant search engine being declared  an illegal monopoly. U.S. District Judge Amit Mehta heard closing arguments Friday from Justice Department lawyers who argued that a radical shake-up is needed to promote a free and fair market. Their proposed remedies include a ban on Google paying to lock its search engine in as the default on smart devices and an order requiring the company to sell its Chrome browser.

Think your return to the office was rough? Musk faces some big challenges

NEW YORK (AP) — Elon Musk is leaving Washington after a short but turbulent stint in government and getting back to his numerous businesses, each with their own set of issues for the billionaire to address. While how much Musk accomplished in his role as President Donald Trump’s chief cost-cutter is up for debate, it’s clear his association with right-wing politics damaged Tesla’s brand and tanked sales. Musk’s social media platform X, formerly Twitter, needs to rebuild its advertising base. His aerospace company SpaceX appears to be financially promising but has seen some recent setbacks. And it’s unclear if his satellite business Starlink can keep striking deals without Trump nearby.

States are rolling out red carpets for data centers. But some lawmakers are pushing back

HARRISBURG, Pa. (AP) — The explosive growth of the data centers needed to power America’s fast-rising demand for artificial intelligence and cloud computing has spurred states to dangle incentives in hopes of landing an economic bonanza. It’s also eliciting pushback in places where an influx of data centers has caused friction with neighboring communities. Activity in state legislatures — and competition for data centers — has been brisk. Many states are offering financial incentives or tax breaks worth tens of millions of dollars. In some cases, those incentives are winning approval only after a fight or efforts to attach riders that require data centers to pay for their own electricity or meet energy efficiency standards.

US supercomputer named after Nobel laureate Jennifer Doudna to power AI and scientific research

BERKELEY, Calif. (AP) — A new supercomputer named after a winner of the Nobel Prize in chemistry will help power artificial intelligence technology and scientific discoveries from a perch in the hills above the University of California, Berkeley, federal officials said Thursday. U.S. Energy Secretary Chris Wright is scheduled to announce the project Thursday alongside executives from computer maker Dell Technologies and chipmaker Nvidia. The new computing system at the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory will be called Doudna after Berkeley professor and biochemist Jennifer Doudna, who won a Nobel in 2020 for her work on the gene-editing technology CRISPR. It’s due to switch on next year.

Czech justice minister resigns over a donated bitcoin scandal

PRAGUE (AP) — Czech Republic Justice Minister Pavel Blažek has resigned from his post over a bitcoin-related scandal. Blažek has been under fire from the opposition after his ministry accepted a donation of bitcoins and sold them for about 1 billion Czech koruna or more than $45 million earlier this year. Blažek said Friday that he wasn’t aware of any wrongdoing. The bitcoins were donated to the ministry by a person who was previously convicted of drug dealing and other crimes and it wasn’t clear where the bitcoins came from. The opposition has accused Blažek of possible money laundering. Police are investigating.

Crypto crime spills over from behind the screen to real-life violence

HARTFORD, Conn. (AP) — An alleged kidnapping in New York is the latest instance in which authorities say cryptocurrency-related crimes have involved real-world violence. Kidnappings for ransom in France have rattled the crypto industry there, including one where a crypto entrepreneur’s father had a finger cut off. Experts believe the increase in violence could be linked to cryptocurrencies’ surging values, violent groups adding crypto thefts to their repertoire and the ease of shielding your identity in crypto transactions. “Things that might clearly be outside of social norms in other spaces — like robbing a bank — are somehow just part of the game here,” said John Griffin, a finance professor at the University of Texas in Austin.

CEO pay rose nearly 10% in 2024 as stock prices and profits soared

NEW YORK (AP) — The typical compensation package for chief executives who run companies in the S&P 500 jumped nearly 10% in 2024 as the stock market enjoyed another banner year and corporate profits rose sharply. The increase for those who occupy the corner office again outpaced the wage gains for the median worker at their company. At half the companies in AP’s annual pay survey, it would take the worker at the middle of the company’s pay scale 192 years to make what the CEO did in one. Rick Smith, the founder and CEO of Axon Enterprises, the maker of Tasers, topped the survey with a pay package valued at $164 million.

Elon Musk came to Washington wielding a chain saw. He leaves behind upheaval and unmet expectations

WASHINGTON (AP) — Elon Musk arrived in the nation’s capital with the chain saw-wielding swagger of a tech titan who had never met a problem he couldn’t solve with lots of money, long hours or a well-calibrated algorithm. Now that’s over. Musk said this week that he’s leaving his job as a senior adviser, an announcement that came after he revealed his plan to curtail political donations and he criticized the centerpiece of Trump’s legislative agenda. It’s a quiet exit after a turbulent entrance, and he’s trailed by upheaval and unmet expectations.

Big Ocean breaks new ground as K-pop’s first deaf group

SEOUL, South Korea (AP) — Big Ocean, the world’s first K-pop group composed entirely of deaf and hard-of-hearing artists, is breaking barriers with high-tech tools and inclusive performances. Since debuting in 2024, the trio has toured Europe while promoting their second mini-album, “Underwater.” Using vibrating smartwatches, visual metronomes, and AI voice tech, they stay in sync while overcoming visual and audio challenges onstage. Their global fanbase, PADO, has embraced their mission—some even learning sign language to connect. The group hopes to collaborate with stars like Justin Bieber and continues to champion inclusion in K-pop.

Texas lawmakers fail to pass ban on social media for those under 18

AUSTIN, Texas (AP) — A push in Texas to ban children under 18 years old from social media platforms has failed at the state Capitol. Lawmakers on Wednesday night did not take a key vote on creating one of the nation’s toughest restrictions aimed at keeping minors off the platforms. The bill aimed to go further than Florida’s ban on social media for minors under 14. The bill was opposed by tech trade groups and critics who called it it an unconstitutional limit on free speech. The sponsor of the measure blamed pushback from unnamed “billionaires” as a key reason for its failure.

Copyright 2025 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.



Link

Continue Reading

Technology

Google, Justice Department face off in search monopoly case

By MICHAEL LIEDTKE and ALAN SUDERMAN, AP Technology Writer WASHINGTON (AP) — The fate and fortunes of one of the world’s most powerful tech companies now sit in the hands of a U.S. judge wrestling with whether to impose far-reaching changes upon Google in the wake of its dominant search engine being declared an illegal monopoly. […]

Published

on


By MICHAEL LIEDTKE and ALAN SUDERMAN, AP Technology Writer

WASHINGTON (AP) — The fate and fortunes of one of the world’s most powerful tech companies now sit in the hands of a U.S. judge wrestling with whether to impose far-reaching changes upon Google in the wake of its dominant search engine being declared an illegal monopoly.

U.S. District Judge Amit Mehta heard closing arguments Friday from Justice Department lawyers who argued that a radical shake-up is needed to promote a free and fair market. Their proposed remedies include a ban on Google paying to lock its search engine in as the default on smart devices and an order requiring the company to sell its Chrome browser.

Google’s legal team argued that only minor concessions are needed and urged Mehta not to unduly punish the company with a harsh ruling that could squelch future innovations. Google also argued that upheaval triggered by advances in artificial intelligence already is reshaping the search landscape, as conversational search options are rolling out from AI startups that are hoping to use the Department of Justice’s four-and-half-year-old case to gain the upper hand in the next technological frontier.

Alphabet CEO Sundar Pichai
Alphabet CEO Sundar Pichai smiles as he walks onto the stage at a Google I/O event in Mountain View, Calif., Tuesday, May 20, 2025. (AP Photo/Jeff Chiu) 

It was an argument that Mehta appeared to give serious consideration as he marveled at the speed at which the AI industry was growing. He also indicated he was still undecided on how much AI’s potential to shake up the search market should be incorporated in his forthcoming ruling. “This is what I’ve been struggling with,” Mehta said.

Mehta spoke frequently at Friday’s hearing, often asking probing and pointed questions to lawyers for both sides, while hinting that he was seeking a middle ground between the two camps’ proposed remedies.

“We’re not looking to kneecap Google,” the judge said, adding that the goal was to “kickstart” competitors’ ability to challenge the search giant’s dominance.

Mehta will spend much of the summer mulling a decision that he plans to issue before Labor Day. Google has already vowed to appeal the ruling that branded its search engine as a monopoly, a step it can’t take until the judge orders a remedy.

Google’s attorney John Schmidtlein asked Mehta to put a 60-day delay on implementing any proposed changes, which Justice prosecutor David Dahlquist immediately objected to.

“We believe the market’s waited long enough,” Dahlquist said.

While both sides of this showdown agree that AI is an inflection point for the industry’s future, they have disparate views on how the shift will affect Google.

The Justice Department contends that AI technology by itself won’t rein in Google’s power, arguing additional legal restraints must be slapped on a search engine that’s the main reason its parent company, Alphabet Inc., is valued at $2 trillion.

Google has already been deploying AI to transform its search engine i nto an answer engine, an effort that has so far helped maintain its perch as the internet’s main gateway despite inroads being made by alternatives from the likes of OpenAI and Perplexity.

The Justice Department contends a divestiture of the Chrome browser that Google CEO Sundar Pichai helped build nearly 20 years ago would be among the most effective countermeasures against Google continuing to amass massive volumes of browser traffic and personal data that could be leveraged to retain its dominance in the AI era. Executives from both OpenAi and Perplexity testified last month that they would be eager bidders for the Chrome browser if Mehta orders its sale.

The debate over Google’s fate also has pulled in opinions from Apple, mobile app developers, legal scholars and startups.



Link

Continue Reading

Technology

Pirated football streams costing broadcasters ‘billions’ amid ‘industrial scale theft’

Pirated streaming of premium television and sports content has reached levels of “industrial scale theft”, costing broadcasters and sports bodies billions of dollars annually, according to a new report by media analysts Enders. The research found that pirated feeds account for a “double digit percentage” of all viewing of premium sports and television content. A […]

Published

on


Pirated streaming of premium television and sports content has reached levels of “industrial scale theft”, costing broadcasters and sports bodies billions of dollars annually, according to a new report by media analysts Enders.

The research found that pirated feeds account for a “double digit percentage” of all viewing of premium sports and television content.


A single pirated stream of a high-profile event, particularly a live football match, can attract “tens of thousands” of viewers.

This figure may be multiplied many times when streams are shared across social media platforms, with stolen live feeds used globally beyond licensed broadcasting areas.

Sport broadcasters are missing out on 'billions' due to pirated streams

Sport broadcasters are missing out on ‘billions’ due to pirated streams

PA

Amazon Fire Sticks have been identified as the primary enabler of this piracy epidemic.

According to 2025 data provided by Sky and cited in the Enders report, 59 per cent of people in the UK who admitted to using pirated feeds in the past 12 months via a physical device said they used an Amazon Fire device.

The devices, which are entirely legal in their original form, can be easily modified or “jailbroken” to access apps showing pirated sports content alongside legitimate services such as Netflix and BBC iPlayer.

Enders researchers described the Amazon Fire Stick as “a piracy enabler” that enables “billions of dollars in piracy” overall.

The Enders report accused major technology companies including Amazon, Google, Meta and Microsoft of “ambivalence and inertia” in addressing the piracy crisis.

Big Tech groups were criticised for “failing to engage decisively with content owners to shore up security architecture, while simultaneously steering consumers to illegal services in the other parts of their businesses”.

JUST IN: Novak Djokovic issues apology after making third round of French Open

The researchers highlighted the “continued depreciation” of Digital Rights Management systems, particularly Google’s Widevine and Microsoft’s PlayReady.

These security technologies, largely unchanged over twenty years, “are now compromised across various security levels” due to lack of maintenance by the tech giants, giving “piracy the upper hand by enabling theft of the highest quality content”.

Industry executives are demanding urgent action from government and major technology platforms to combat the escalating piracy crisis.

Nick Herm, Sky’s chief operating officer, said the report “highlights the significant scale and impact of piracy”.

READ MORE: Steven Gerrard, 44, lands new job five months after Al-Ettifaq exit

Modified Amazon fire sticks are seen as the primary enablers

Modified Amazon fire sticks are seen as the primary enablers

PA

He added: “We’d like to see faster, more joined-up action from major tech platforms and government to address the problem and help protect the UK creative industries.”

Media analyst Claire Enders warned that “piracy is costing content originators, pay-TV and streaming companies, many billions globally”.

The report concluded that “combating piracy a formidable challenge, providing a direct threat to profitability for broadcasters and streamers”, with calls for a complete overhaul of technology architecture licensing.

LATEST SPORTS NEWS:



Link

Continue Reading

Technology

Trump and Putin want to talk business once the Ukraine war ends. Here’s why it won’t be easy | U.S.

Hundreds of foreign companies left Russia after the 2022 invasion of Ukraine, including major U.S. firms like Coca-Cola, Nike, Starbucks, ExxonMobil and Ford Motor Co. But after more than three years of war, President Donald Trump has held out the prospect of restoring U.S.-Russia trade if there’s ever a peace settlement. And Russian President Vladimir […]

Published

on


Hundreds of foreign companies left Russia after the 2022 invasion of Ukraine, including major U.S. firms like Coca-Cola, Nike, Starbucks, ExxonMobil and Ford Motor Co.

But after more than three years of war, President Donald Trump has held out the prospect of restoring U.S.-Russia trade if there’s ever a peace settlement. And Russian President Vladimir Putin has said foreign companies could come back under some circumstances.

“Russia wants to do largescale TRADE with the United States when this catastrophic ‘bloodbath’ is over, and I agree,” Trump said in a statement after a phone call with Putin. “There is a tremendous opportunity for Russia to create massive amounts of jobs and wealth. Its potential is UNLIMITED.”

The president then shifted his tone toward Putin after heavy drone and missile attacks on Kyiv, saying Putin “has gone absolutely crazy” and threatening new sanctions. That and recent comments from Putin warning Western companies against reclaiming their former stakes seemed to reflect reality more accurately — that it’s not going to be a smooth process for businesses going back into Russia.

That’s because Russia’s business environment has massively changed since 2022. And not in ways that favor foreign companies.

And with Putin escalating attacks and holding on to territory demands Ukraine likely isn’t going to accept, a peace deal seems distant indeed.

Here are factors that could deter U.S. companies from ever going back:

Risk of losing it all

Russian law classifies Ukraine’s allies as “unfriendly states” and imposes severe restrictions on businesses from more than 50 countries. Those include limits on withdrawing money and equipment as well as allowing the Russian government to take control of companies deemed important. Foreign owners’ votes on boards of directors can be legally disregarded.

Companies that left were required to sell their businesses for 50% or less of their assessed worth, or simply wrote them off while Kremlin-friendly business groups snapped up their assets on the cheap. Under a 2023 presidential decree the Russian government took control of Finnish energy company Fortum, German power company Unipro, France’s dairy company Danone and Danish brewer Carlsberg.

Even if a peace deal removed the U.S. from the list of unfriendlies, and if the massive Western sanctions restricting business in Russia were dropped, the track record of losses would remain vivid. And there’s little sign any of that is going to happen.

While the Russian government has talked in general about companies coming back, “there’s no specific evidence of any one company saying that they are ready to come back,” said Chris Weafer, CEO of Macro-Advisory Ltd. consultancy. “It’s all at the political narrative level.”

Russia’s actions and legal changes have left “long-lasting damage” to its business environment, says Elina Ribakova, non-resident senior fellow at the Bruegel research institute in Brussels.

She said a return of U.S. businesses is “not very likely.”

‘We need to strangle them’

In a meeting at the Kremlin on May 26 to mark Russian Entrepreneurs Day, Putin said that Russia needed to throttle large tech firms such as Zoom and Microsoft, which had restricted their services in Russia after Moscow’s invasion of Ukraine, so that domestic tech companies could thrive instead.

“We need to strangle them,” Putin said. “After all, they are trying to strangle us: we need to reciprocate. We didn’t kick anyone out; we didn’t interfere with anyone. We provided the most favorable conditions possible for their work here, in our market, and they are trying to strangle us.”

He reassured a representative from Vkusno-i Tochka (Tasty-period) — the Russian-owned company that took over McDonald’s restaurants in the country — that Moscow would aid them if the U.S. fast food giant tried to buy back its former stores. Asked for comment, McDonald’s referred to their 2022 statement that “ownership of the business in Russia is no longer tenable.”

Not much upside

On top of Russia’s difficult business environment, the economy is likely to stagnate due to lack of investment in sectors other than the military, economists say.

“Russia has one of the lowest projected long-term growth rates and one of the highest levels of country risk in the world,” says Heli Simola, senior economist at the Bank of Finland in a blog post. “Only Belarus offers an equally lousy combination of growth and risk.”

Most of the opportunity to make money is related to military production, and it’s unlikely U.S. companies would work with the Russian military-industrial complex, said Ribakova. “It’s not clear where exactly one could plug in and expect outsize returns that would compensate for this negative investment environment.”

Repurchase agreements

Some companies, including Renault and Ford Motor Co., left with repurchase agreements letting them buy back their stakes years later if conditions change. But given Russia’s unsteady legal environment, that’s tough to count on.

The Russian purchasers may try to change the terms, look for more money, or ignore the agreements, said Weafer. “There’s a lot of uncertainty as to how those buyback auctions will be enforced.”

But what about the oil and gas?

Multinational oil companies were among those who suffered losses leaving Russia, so it’s an open question whether they would want to try again even given Russia’s vast oil and gas reserves. US.. major ExxonMobil saw its stake in the Sakhalin oil project unilaterally terminated and wrote off $3.4 billion.

Russia’s major oil companies have less need of foreign partners than they did in the immediate post-Soviet era, though smaller oil field services might want to return given the size of Russia’s oil industry. But they would have to face new requirements on establishing local presence and investment, Weafer said.

Some never left

According to the Kyiv School of Economics, 2,329 foreign companies are still doing business in Russia, many from China or other countries that aren’t allied with Ukraine, while 1,344 are in the process of leaving and 494 have exited completely. The Yale School of Management’s Chief Executive Leadership Institute lists some two dozen U.S. companies still doing business in Russia, while some 100 more have cut back by halting new investments.

EU sanctions could remain even if US open

U.S. sanctions are considered the toughest, because they carry the threat of being cut off from the U.S. banking and financial system. But the EU is still slapping new rounds of sanctions on Russia. Even if U.S. sanctions are dropped, EU sanctions would continue to present compliance headaches for any company that also wants to do business in Europe.



Link

Continue Reading

Technology

SIGNING DAY SPORTS INVESTOR ALERT by the Former Attorney General of Louisiana: Kahn Swick & Foti, LLC Investigates Merger of Signing Day Sports, Inc. – SGN

Former Attorney General of Louisiana Charles C. Foti, Jr., Esq. and the law firm of Kahn Swick & Foti, LLC (“KSF”) are investigating the proposed merger of Signing Day Sports, Inc. (NYSE: SGN) and One Blockchain LLC. Upon closing of the proposed transaction, Signing Day shareholders are expected to own approximately 8.5% of the combined […]

Published

on


Former Attorney General of Louisiana Charles C. Foti, Jr., Esq. and the law firm of Kahn Swick & Foti, LLC (“KSF”) are investigating the proposed merger of Signing Day Sports, Inc. (NYSE: SGN) and One Blockchain LLC. Upon closing of the proposed transaction, Signing Day shareholders are expected to own approximately 8.5% of the combined company. KSF is seeking to determine whether the merger and the process that led to it are adequate, or whether the merger is fair to Signing Day shareholders.

If you would like to discuss your legal rights regarding the proposed transaction, you may, without obligation or cost to you, e-mail or call KSF Managing Partner Lewis S. Kahn (lewis.kahn@ksfcounsel.com) toll free at any time at 855-768-1857, or visit https://www.ksfcounsel.com/cases/nyse-sgn/ to learn more.

To learn more about KSF, whose partners include the Former Louisiana Attorney General, visit www.ksfcounsel.com.

CONNECT WITH US: FaceBook || Instagram || YouTube || TikTok || LinkedIn



Link

Continue Reading

Most Viewed Posts

Trending