Connect with us

NIL

Post-combine list includes some newcomers

2025 NBA Draft Combine winners: Raynaud, Lendeborg and Byrd These 2025 NBA draft prospects are the biggest winners from the NBA Draft Combine With the NBA draft lottery (hello, Dallas Mavericks) and draft combine over, teams and prospects now turn their attention to pro days and mostly private workouts where even more impressions are made. […]

Published

on


play

With the NBA draft lottery (hello, Dallas Mavericks) and draft combine over, teams and prospects now turn their attention to pro days and mostly private workouts where even more impressions are made.

Those impressions lead to decisions at the June 25-26 NBA draft. Maybe it makes the difference between getting selected 16th or 13th.

Also, per NCAA rules, underclassmen have until Wednesday, May 28, to withdraw from the draft and retain NCAA eligibility. Among potential first-round picks who are weighing the decision to remain in the draft or return to college are Alex Condon, who won a title with Florida in April; Tahaad Pettiford, who helped Auburn reach the Final Four; and Yaxel Lendeborg, who played for UAB in 2024-25 but has pledged to play at Michigan next season if he returns to college.

Here’s a look at USA TODAY’s post-combine NBA mock draft:

(Age listed is age at time of the draft; for U.S. college players, height (without shoes) and weight taken at NBA draft combine)

2025 NBA mock draft

1. Dallas Mavericks: Cooper Flagg, Duke

  • Freshman, guard-forward, 6-7¾ , 221, 18 years old
  • 2024-25 stats: 19.2 ppg, 7.5 rpg, 4.2 apg, 1.4 spg, 1.4 bpg, 48.1% FG, 38.5% 3PT, 84% FT

The do-it-all young star led the Blue Devils in scoring, rebounding, assists and steals. Flagg has outstanding footwork, especially in the low post. He can use either hand on shots in the paint, knows how to run plays, can hit catch-and-shoot 3s and is an active weakside defender. Flagg, who added more muscle since the start of the year, is a physical player who initiates contact, is confident and plays with force when necessary. He led Duke to an impressive season, which includes the ACC regular-season title, ACC tournament title and Final Four appearance. He had 30 points, seven assists and six rebounds in a regional semifinal victory against Arizona and 16 points and nine rebounds in a regional final against Alabama. Flagg had 27 points, seven rebounds, three blocks and two steals in a Final Four loss to Houston.

2. San Antonio Spurs: Dylan Harper, Rutgers

  • Freshman, guard, 6-4½ , 213, 19
  • 2024-25 stats: 19.4 ppg, 4.6 rpg, 4.0 apg, 1.4 spg, 48.4% FG, 33.3% 3PT, 75% FT

The lefty stroke will remind some of Jalen Brunson, but Harper has far more size at 6-6 and tremendous length with a wingspan of 6-foot-10. Harper’s best asset at the next level might be his versatility to run point and play off the ball. In Rutgers’ lone Big Ten tournament game, Harper had 27 points (9-for-21 shooting), eight rebounds, eight assists, two steals and two blocks in a double-overtime loss to Southern California.

3. Philadelphia 76ers: Ace Bailey, Rutgers

  • Freshman, guard-forward, 6-7½ , 202, 18
  • 2024-25 stats: 17.6 ppg, 7.2 rpg, 1.3 apg, 1.3 bpg, 46% FG, 34.6% 3PT, 69.2% FT

Bailey is a hyper-athletic wing with length and size coming into a league that prioritizes players built exactly the way he is with exactly the skill set he has: an effortless and reliable shot and an attack-first mentality with an ability to finish at the rim. Needs to improve as a playmaker on the pass and free throws. But even when offense isn’t easy, he remains active on defense. He had 17 points, seven rebounds, three steals and one block in season-ending loss to USC.

4. Charlotte Hornets: VJ Edgecombe, Baylor

  • Freshman, guard, 6-4, 193, 19
  • 2024-25 stats: 15.0 ppg, 5.6 rpg, 3.2 apg, 2.1 spg, 43.6% FG, 34% 3PT, 78.2% FT

The Bahamian native has displayed his athleticism, has shown he can be explosive and has an elite knack for steals. He will be able to contribute at the NBA level and can be aggressive at the point of attack. The freshman is a high-level off-ball scorer but can improve when it comes to on-ball scoring. Edgecombe logged significant minutes at the end of the season. He had 16 points, six rebounds and one steal in a NCAA Tournament second-round loss to Duke.

5. Utah Jazz: Tre Johnson, Texas

  • Freshman, guard, 6-4¾, 190, 19
  • 2024-25 stats: 19.9 ppg, 3.1 rpg, 2.7 apg, 42.7% FG, 39.7% 3PT, 87.1% FT

Johnson is a natural shooter and scorer. He does well when scoring on the move and is a decent playmaker for his size. He still needs to work on his ability to make plays for others. He must also work on his strength and his explosiveness in order to assert himself as a finisher at the rim. He had three 30-point games in the past two months, including 39 against Arkansas on Feb. 26. He had 23 points and six rebounds in an NCAA Tournament loss to Xavier.

6. Washington Wizards: Jeremiah Fears, Oklahoma

  • Freshman, guard, 6-2½, 180, 18
  • 2024-25 stats: 17.1 ppg, 4.1 apg, 4.1 rpg, 1.6 spg, 43.4% FG, 28.4% 3PT, 85.1% FT

Solid start to his freshman season; quick on the dribble; has strength going to the rim and can finish; operates well in the pick-and-roll as a scorer and passer; needs to improve his 3-point shot but potential is there. Fears scored a season-high 31 points and added five assists and four rebounds in a win against ranked Missouri. Fears had a strong SEC tournament, producing 29 points, six rebounds and five steals plus five turnovers in a victory against Georgia and 28 points, five assists, four rebounds and three steals (just one turnover) in a loss to Kentucky. He generated 20 points, five rebounds and four assists in a NCAA Tournament first-round loss to UConn.

7. New Orleans Pelicans: Kon Knueppel, Duke

  • Freshman, guard-forward, 6-5, 219, 19
  • 2024-25 stats: 14.4 ppg, 4.0 rpg, 2.7 apg, 47.9% FG, 40.6% 3PT, 91.4% FT

He can ignite an offense with his 3-point shot, thanks to an efficient motion, seemingly always ready to receive the ball in his shooting pocket. He can also lace shots from midrange, take care of the ball and is money on free throws. In the ACC tournament, Knueppel averaged 21 points (28 against Georgia Tech) and shot 48.6% from the field, stepping up with Flagg injured. He averaged 20.5 points and shot 11-for-22 from the field (4-for-6 on 3s) in two regional games. He had 21 points, five rebounds and five assists in an Elite Eight victory against Alabama, and 16 points and seven rebounds in a Final Four loss to Houston.

8. Brooklyn Nets: Khaman Maluach, Duke

  • Freshman, center, 7-0½, 253, 18
  • 2024-25 stats: 8.6 ppg, 6.6 rpg, 1.3 bpg, 71.2% FG, 76.6% FT

Playing about 20 minutes per game, Maluach is a mobile big who excels in pick-and-rolls and has the hands to catch lobs for easy dunks; soft touch at the rim; shot-blocker/rim protector; active on the offensive glass; will get stronger and has a great aptitude for the game, learning concepts quickly. In four NCAA Tournament games, Maluach, who played for South Sudan at the 2024 Paris Olympics, averages 11.5 points, 4.2 rebounds, 2.0 blocks and shoots 86.9% from the field (20-for-23) and had 14 points and nine rebounds in Elite Eight victory against Alabama. He struggled to make an impact in the Final Four loss to Houston with just six points and no rebounds.

9. Toronto Raptors: Kasparas Jakucionis, Illinois

  • Freshman, guard, 6-4¾, 205, 19
  • 2024-25 stats: 15.0 ppg, 5.7 rpg, 4.7 apg, 44% FG, 31.8% 3PT, 84.5% FT

Jakucionis is a playmaker – a scorer and passer. He has range with a nice 3-ball, can shoot off the dribble from deep, including on step-back 3s, and looks for an open teammate when he draws multiple defenders. Jakucionis sees the court well with savvy passes and likes to get to the rim for layups. But he can be turnover-prone. He struggled offensively at the end of the season, shooting 32.5% from the field and committing 24 turnovers in the final four games. He had 16 points, 10 assists and nine rebounds in a first-round NCAA Tournament victory against Xavier.

10. Houston Rockets: Collin Murray-Boyles, South Carolina

  • Sophomore, forward, 6-6½, 239, 20
  • 2024-25 stats: 16.8 ppg, 8.3 rpg, 2.4 agp, 1.5 spg, 1.3 bpg, 58.6% FG, 26.5% 3PT, 70.7% FT

Although he’s a bit undersized for a power forward, Murray-Boyles plays with intense effort and determination, which will very quickly please his NBA coaches. He also has plenty of strength to finish at the rim and was the SEC’s No. 3 rebounder. Murray-Boyles had 35 points and seven rebounds against Arkansas late in the regular season and had 20 points and 12 rebounds in a loss to Arkansas in the SEC tournament.

11. Portland Trail Blazers: Derik Queen, Maryland

  • Freshman, center, 6-9¼, 248, 20
  • 2024-25 stats: 16.5 ppg, 9.0 rpg, 1.9 apg, 1.1 spg, 1.1 bpg, 52.6% FG, 76.6% FT

An active, physical big man, Queen has a soft touch around the rim with either hand but has a power game, too. He can run the court and handle the basketball well for a power forward-center. He is another potential first-round pick with good hands and footwork and has the mechanics to become a shooter who can stretch the floor. Queen had 27 points, five rebounds and two steals in a Sweet 16 loss to eventual champion Florida.

12. Chicago Bulls: Noa Essengue, Ratiopharm Ulm (Germany)

  • Forward, 6-10, 198, 18
  • 2024-25 stats: 10.8 ppg, 4.8 rpg, 1.1 apg, 51.6% FG, 27% 3PT, 70.5% FT

The next forward with elite finishing ability to come out of France, Essengue figures to be more of a developmental prospect, but his size, instincts at the rim and plus-defensive ability could make him a star if he bulks up.

13. Atlanta Hawks: Egor Demin, BYU

  • Freshman, forward, 6-8¼, 199, 19
  • 2024-25 stats: 10.3 ppg, 5.4 apg, 3.8 rpg, 1.2 spg, 41% FG, 27.1% 3PT, 67.5% FT

The Russian is a playmaker who can make quick decisions and facilitate for others. Demin is the size of a wing player but has guard-like skills. On defense, he uses his length to his advantage while forcing turnovers and being active in passing lanes. His shooting efficiency is a concern. Demin had difficulty with his offense as the season progressed. He had just three points with four turnovers, three assists and three rebounds in a Big 12 conference tournament victory against Iowa State and six points on 2-for-9 shooting (1-for-7 on 3s) with four assists and five turnovers in a conference tournament loss to Houston. In three NCAA tournament games, he averaged 13.7 points, 5.7 assists and 4.7 rebounds and was 15-for-35 from the field.

14. San Antonio Spurs: Carter Bryant, Arizona

  • Freshman, forward, 6-6½, 215, 19
  • 2024-25 stats: 6.5 ppg, 4.1 rpg, 1.0 apg, 1.0 bpg, 46% FG, 37.1% 3PT, 69.5% FT

The athletic forward provides a solid combination of strength and fluidity. He has lateral quickness to stay in front of the ball and the ability to block shots. He can still improve on his technique as a finisher and in scoring efficiency. He will get an increased opportunity to impress scouts and executives at the draft combine if he enters the draft. Bryant scored 12 points and collected five rebounds and three blocks in 20 minutes in a victory against Akron in the NCAA Tournament.

15. Oklahoma City Thunder: Asa Newell, Georgia

  • Freshman, forward, 6-9, 224, 19
  • 2024-25 stats: 15.4 ppg, 6.9 rpg, 1.0 spg, 1.0 bpg, 54.3% FG, 29.2% 3PT, 74.8% FT

Based off of his size, Newell wouldn’t appear to be as quick and fluid as he is, which should make him an instant threat in pick-and-roll situations. He was one of the lone bright spots for the Bulldogs in a loss against No. 1 Auburn with a team-high 20 points. His scoring dipped at the end of the regular season, however, he had 20 points and eight rebounds in a first-round NCAA Tournament loss to Gonzaga.

16. Orlando Magic: Jase Richardson, Michigan State

  • Freshman, guard, 6-0½, 178, 19
  • 2024-25 stats: 12.1 ppg, 3.3 rpg, 1.9 apg, 49.3% FG, 41.2% 3PT, 83.6% FT

Richardson improved as the season progressed and turned into the Spartans’ steady hand with the basketball as a shooter (inside and out) and facilitator. He is an active defender with surprising bouts of athleticism. He also has a knack for collecting rebounds, big plays and poise under pressure. He had an up-and-down NCAA Tournament in four games – 5-for-11 shooting and 15 points against Bryant, 1-for-10 shooting against New Mexico, 20 points on 6-for-8 shooting against Ole Miss, and 4-for-13 shooting against Auburn.

17. Minnesota Timberwolves: Danny Wolf, Michigan

  • Junior, forward-center, 6-10½, 252, 21
  • 2024-25 stats: 13.2 ppg, 9.7 rpg, 3.6 apg, 1.4 bpg, 49.7% FG, 33.6% 3PT, 59.4% FT

The Yale transfer is shooting up draft boards thanks to his fluid scoring and play-making portfolio in the package of a 7-foot stretch big. Wolf played point guard at times this season for the Wolverines just like he played center. His handles make him a threat as the initiator in pick-and-roll actions and his range should translate to the NBA. Wolf had 21 points and 14 rebounds against Maryland in the Big Ten tournament semifinals and shot 52.9% from the field as the Wolverines won the conference tourney. He had 20 points and six rebounds in a NCAA regional semifinals loss to Auburn.

18. Washington Wizards: Liam McNeeley, UConn

  • Freshman, forward, 6-6¾, 215, 19
  • 2024-25 stats: 14.5 ppg, 6.0 rpg, 2.3 apg, 38.1% FG, 31.7% 3PT, 86.6% FT

What McNeeley may lack in fluid athleticism, he more than makes up for with a smooth, natural shot and knack for drawing fouls and getting to the free throw line. He also has a quick release and plenty of range to suggest that he should get early minutes. He bounced back since suffering an ankle injury New Year’s Day that had sidelined him for a few weeks. McNeeley struggled with his shot at times down the stretch. In a Big East tournament loss to Creighton, McNeeley had 13 points on 6-for-20 shooting (0-for-5 on 3-pointers), and in his final eight games before the NCAA Tournament, he shot 34.1% from the field and 28.2% on 3s. In two NCAA Tournament games, he was 8-for-29 from the field, including 3-of-16 on 3s.

19. Brooklyn Nets: Nolan Traore, Saint-Quentin (France)

  • Guard, 6-4, 175, 19
  • 2024-25 stats: 12 ppg, 4.8 apg, 1.9 rpg, 40.9% FG, 31.4% 3PT, 72.8% FT

Traore is a point guard who can score and pass and has court awareness but also a propensity for bad turnovers. He’s quick, can get to the rim and is comfortable taking his defender off the dribble. Needs to work on his shooting efficiency, especially on 3s. His brother, Armel, was on a two-way contract with the Los Angeles and South Bay Lakers before being waived in February.

20. Miami Heat: Thomas Sorber, Georgetown

  • Freshman, forward-center, 6-9¼, 263, 19
  • 2024-25 stats: 14.5 ppg, 8.5 rpg, 2.4 apg, 2.0 spg, 53.2% FG, 72.4% FT

The standout freshman required surgery to repair a foot injury suffered Feb. 15 and missed the rest of the season. That could alter his plans for the draft, but Sorber is a stellar inside threat who’s just as comfortable cutting to the basket on pick-and-rolls as he is backing down opponents. His rebounding and rim protection will make him an asset, as he continues to grow into his frame.

21. Utah Jazz: Joan Beringer, KK Cedevita (Adriatic League)

  • Forward-center, 6-10, 230, 18
  • 2024-25 stats: 5.0 ppg, 4.6 rpg, 1.4 bpg, 61.5% FG, 58.4% FT

Beringer has gained traction among NBA scouts and executives as a mobile big man who can run the pick-and-roll as a screener on offense and guard the pick-and-roll. He doesn’t have a lot of experience but his potential, especially as a rim protector, has made him a first-round prospect. Another player who has improved throughout the season.

22. Atlanta Hawks: Nique Clifford, Colorado State

  • Fifth-year graduate season, guard, 6-5¼, 202, 23
  • 2024-25 stats: 18.9 ppg, 9.6 rpg, 4.4 apg, 1.2 spg, 49.6% FG, 37.7% 3PT, 77.7% FT

Clifford is a versatile wing who does a lot of things – scoring, rebounding, passing and defending. He has a quick burst on drives to the basket and can finish with force or finesse. He logged big minutes for Colorado State and was excellent in the Rams’ final six games before the NCAA tournament, posting 25.3 points, 7.8 rebounds, 5.2 assists and 1.5 steals and shooting 60% from the field, including 54.8% on 3s. He had 36 points against Boise State at the end of the regular season and recorded two double-doubles in the Mountain West tournament. Clifford had 21 points, seven rebounds, six assists and two blocks in an NCAA tournament second-round loss to Maryland.

23. Indiana Pacers: Will Riley, Illinois

Freshman, forward, 6-8¼, 186, 19

2024-25 stats: 12.6 ppg, 4.1 rpg, 2.2 apg, 43.2% FG, 32.6% 3PT, 72.4% FT

Great size for a shooting guard who can make 3s and find open teammates. Like many, looks for offensive rebounds. His shot is a work in progress but the mechanics are there and he improved as a shooter and scorer as the season progressed. He shot 37-for-72 (51.4%) from the field and averaged 16.3 points in the Illini’s final six games.

24. Oklahoma City Thunder: Rasheer Fleming, Saint Joseph’s

  • Junior, forward, 6-8¼, 232, 20
  • 2024-25 stats: 14.75 ppg, 8.5 rpg, 1.5 bpg, 1.4 spg, 1.3 apg, 53.1% FG, 39% 3PT, 74.3% FT

Fleming is a mobile forward who plays a physical game and has strong footwork to finesse his way around defenders. He likes to get easy buckets in transition, his 3-point percentage in nearly five attempts per game is encouraging and he is valuable in pick-and-rolls as the screener. Defensively, he deflects passes and can protect the rim. Fleming averaged 18.8 points and 7.7 rebounds and shot 58.9% in the last six regular-season Atlantic 10 Conference contests.

25. Orlando Magic: Ben Saraf, Ratiopharm Ulm (Germany)

  • Guard, 6-6, 200, 19
  • 2024-25 stats: 12.2 ppg, 4.3 apg, 2.6 rpg, 1.2 spg, 45.5% FG, 28.6% 3PT, 72.7% FT

He’s just as comfortable knocking down a step-back jumper, finding creases in the paint and dishing the ball with excellent vision. He may need some time to develop as he adjusts to NBA athletes, but his length and size at point guard will make him an intriguing prospect.

26. Brooklyn Nets: Yaxel Lendeborg, UAB

  • Senior, forward, 6-8½, 235, 22
  • 2024-25 stats: 17.7 ppg, 11.4 rpg, 4.2 apg, 52.2% FG, 35.7% 3PT, 75.7% FT

Lendeborg is active defensively, likes to attack in transition, is active in the paint and cuts to the rim and looks for the ball. Possesses good size and strength for his position and initiates contact. His shooting percentage inside and outside the 3-point line (specifically as catch-and-shoot on 3s) are good signs for the forward from Puerto Rico. Depending on his draft evaluation, Lendeborg, the 2024-25 American Athletic Conference player of the year, could end up at Michigan for another season of college basketball.

27. Brooklyn Nets: Hugo Gonzalez, Real Madrid (Spain)

  • Guard-forward, 6-7, 207, 19
  • 2024-25 stats: 3.2 ppg, 1.7 rpg, 41% FG, 28.1% 3PT, 73.9% FT

One of Europe’s top young NBA prospects, Gonzalez is a versatile wing with the ability to score inside and out. He can handle the basketball, pass and is a surprising shot-blocker. He’s still raw.

28. Boston Celtics: Walter Clayton Jr., Florida

  • Senior, guard, 6-2, 199, 22
  • 2024-25 stats: 18.3 ppg, 4.2 apg, 3.7 rpg, 1.2 spg, 44.8% FG, 38.6% 3PT, 85.7% FT

Named the Most Outstanding Player of the Final Four, Clayton had 34 points in the national semifinals against Auburn and 11 points, seven assists and five rebounds in the championship victory against Houston. He also scored 30 points in a regional final against Texas Tech and was 21-for-42 from the field in the Gators’ final three games. Has range on 3-point shots and can shoot off the dribble or pass but needs to improve as a playmaker and defender.

29. Phoenix Suns: Noah Penda, Le Mans (France)

  • Forward, 6-8, 225, 20
  • 2024-25 stats: 10.2 ppg, 5.1 rpg, 2.7 apg, 1.3 spg, 45.8% FG, 34.7% 3PT, 67.9% FT

A solidly-built wing, Penda may not be the most explosive athlete, but he has flashed excellent footwork in the low block, has steady enough ball-handling abilities and can knock down 3s with relative efficiency. Penda has also shown that he can move well without the ball, often slashing through a defense on cuts for easy buckets. Improved as a shooter and scorer as the season progressed.

30. Los Angeles Clippers: Drake Powell, North Carolina

  • Freshman, guard-forward, 6-5¼, 200, 19
  • 2024-25 stats: 7.4 ppg, 3.4 rpg, 1.1 apg, 48.3% FG, 37.9% 3PT, 64.8% FT

Active on both ends of the court as a shot-blocker and physical and versatile defender, and as a player who likes to run the court, launch catch-and-shoot 3s and go one-on-one in the halfcourt. Playing on a deep team, especially on the perimeter, Powell doesn’t possess eye-popping offensive stats but his shooting stats reveal his potential. Was an efficient scorer in limited opportunities and can be a solid rebounder from the perimeter.



Link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

NIL

Will UCF Knights Share at Full House-NCAA Revenue Level Next Season?

Power conference school are opting in to share revenue in the House vs. NCAA settlement, but some have more challenges than others. UCF is one of those schools. Just a few decades ago, the Knights were a Division II school. Now, UCF is part of the Big 12 — but has only been a member […]

Published

on


Power conference school are opting in to share revenue in the House vs. NCAA settlement, but some have more challenges than others.

UCF is one of those schools.

Just a few decades ago, the Knights were a Division II school. Now, UCF is part of the Big 12 — but has only been a member for two years.

Plus, they’re not technically full members yet, at least from a revenue standpoint. For their first two athletic years in the conference, they’re only getting a partial share of revenue.

But, they’ve opted into the House settlement, which has made reaching the top of the revenue allowed to be shared a challenge for athletic director Terry Mohajir.

Recently, Yahoo Sports reported that UCF received $21 million from the Big 12 as its payout for its first year in the league, which was 2023-24. That amounts of a half-share of the revenue that full members got, which was approximately $37-40 million.

The Knights will get another half-share for the 2024-25 athletic year and then start receiving a full share this upcoming season. That includes a new television contract with ESPN and Fox that will reportedly pay each school $31.7 million in TV money.

The league also gets revenue from bowl games, the College Football Playoff, the NCAA, ticket sales for conference championships and additional sources.  

So, there’s some ground to make up and Mohajir knows it, as he told reporters during the Big 12 annual meetings in Orlando earlier this week.

He believes the Knights will get there, even with half-shares of revenue the past two years.

“We’re real close. We’ll be there, for sure,” he said to outlets, including the Daytona Beach News-Journal. “I’ve just got a couple more things we’re working on, some revenue pieces that we’re putting together. But we’ll be there come July 1. We’re very happy about that, by the way. We’ll become full-share members.”

The House v. NCAA settlement is a combination of three different cases brought by current and former student-athletes. It will allow for $2.75 billion in damages will be paid to thousands of college athletes over 10 years as part of restitution for their inability to access things like Name, Image and Likeness (NIL) opportunities.

The settlement also caps rosters and, in some cases, expands rosters, especially in the case of Olympic sports. Plus, it allows for schools to fully fund every scholarship offered, which wasn’t the case pre-House.

The House settlement doesn’t limit student-athletes from engaging in NIL and many schools are bringing outside collectives in-house. But every NIL deal of more than $600 must be vetted and approved by the new NIL Go system being developed by Deloitte.



Link

Continue Reading

NIL

DJ Lagway Lands Lamborghini NIL Deal in Power Move

DJ Lagway Lands Lamborghini NIL Deal in Power Move originally appeared on Athlon Sports. What’s faster than a DJ Lagway spiral? Maybe the Lamborghini he just partnered with. In a deal that’s revving up the college football NIL world, Florida Gators quarterback DJ Lagway announced a new endorsement with Lamborghini Orlando. Lagway’s move that positions […]

Published

on


DJ Lagway Lands Lamborghini NIL Deal in Power Move originally appeared on Athlon Sports.

What’s faster than a DJ Lagway spiral? Maybe the Lamborghini he just partnered with.

In a deal that’s revving up the college football NIL world, Florida Gators quarterback DJ Lagway announced a new endorsement with Lamborghini Orlando. Lagway’s move that positions the sophomore star as one of the faces of modern college athletics.

Advertisement

“Would you choose the orange or the blue Lamborghini?” Lagway teased on Instagram, alongside photos of him posing with the two Gator-themed luxury vehicles. The event, hosted by Lamborghini Orlando, drew fans to meet the 19-year-old’s star.

Lagway, one of the nation’s highest-valued NIL athletes, holds a current evaluation of $3.7 million, according to On3. His portfolio already includes high-profile brands like Gatorade, EA Sports, Nintendo, and Epic Games, but this latest partnership pushes his brand further.

Related: Former Ivy League Star Turns Heads With Groundbreaking $6 Million NIL Deal

On the field, Lagway’s rise has been just as headline-worthy. After leading the Gators to a perfect 5-0 record in games he started last season, he returns as the full-time starter with 1,915 passing yards and 12 touchdowns under his belt. With one of the SEC’s most loaded offenses, including targets like Tre Wilson and Dallas Wilson, and a dynamic backfield duo in Jadan Baugh and Ja’Kobi Jackson, Lagway is poised for a breakout season that could vault him into the Heisman conversation.

Advertisement

And now, he’s doing it all with Lamborghini-level swagger.

Related: Livvy Dunne Sends Strong Message to Airport Autograph Stalkers

Lagway is building his own empire in Gainesville, merging elite athleticism with big-brand appeal in a way rarely seen in college sports.

The Gators kick off the season in The Swamp on August 30 against Long Island University, and the buzz is already deafening. If Lagway keeps this momentum, Lamborghini won’t be the only brand gunning for a piece of his spotlight.

This story was originally reported by Athlon Sports on Jun 1, 2025, where it first appeared.



Link

Continue Reading

NIL

Nico Iamaleava ignites ACC storm with $8M QB move, unleashing college football’s cash chaos

The Financial Revolution in College Football In the ever-evolving landscape of college football, the influence of money has become more pronounced than ever, reshaping the dynamics of the sport. The advent of Name, Image, and Likeness (NIL) deals has introduced a new era where financial negotiations often overshadow athletic merit. This shift is epitomized by […]

Published

on


The Financial Revolution in College Football

In the ever-evolving landscape of college football, the influence of money has become more pronounced than ever, reshaping the dynamics of the sport. The advent of Name, Image, and Likeness (NIL) deals has introduced a new era where financial negotiations often overshadow athletic merit. This shift is epitomized by the recent developments surrounding promising quarterback Nico Iamaleava, whose lucrative $8 million deal has sent shockwaves through the Atlantic Coast Conference (ACC) and beyond.

Nico Iamaleava: A Rising Star with a Price Tag

Nico Iamaleava’s journey into the limelight is a testament to the changing priorities in college athletics. Once, the focus was on raw talent and potential; now, financial considerations play a pivotal role. Iamaleava’s substantial NIL deal, valued at $8 million, has not only secured his future but also raised eyebrows across the college football community. Such a significant investment in a player yet to take a collegiate snap highlights the shifting paradigm where potential earnings can eclipse on-field achievements.

The Broader Impact on College Football

Iamaleava’s agreement is not an isolated incident but part of a broader trend that has seen young athletes command unprecedented sums. The case of Bryce Underwood, who reportedly secured a $10.5 million cap without playing a single game, underscores the growing emphasis on financial incentives. These developments have sparked debates about the essence of college sports, where the focus on education and athletic development is increasingly intertwined with commercial interests.

Navigating the New Normal

As college football navigates this new financial landscape, institutions and athletes alike face significant challenges. Schools must balance the allure of attracting top talent with the potential risks associated with hefty financial commitments. Meanwhile, young athletes are thrust into the spotlight, managing both the pressures of performance and the expectations tied to their lucrative deals. This new era demands a delicate equilibrium between nurturing talent and negotiating financial realities.

Reflecting on the Future of College Athletics

The rise of NIL deals and their impact on college football is a reflection of broader societal changes, where the lines between amateur and professional sports are increasingly blurred. As the sport continues to evolve, the focus must remain on preserving the integrity and spirit of college athletics. The journey of Nico Iamaleava and others like him serves as a reminder of the need for thoughtful consideration of how financial incentives are integrated into the collegiate sports framework.

In conclusion, while the financial revolution in college football presents new opportunities, it also poses significant challenges that require careful navigation. The stories of athletes like Iamaleava highlight the importance of balancing financial interests with the core values of college sports, ensuring that the essence of the game remains intact for future generations.



Link

Continue Reading

NIL

Cowboy Baseball Advances To NCAA Athens Regional Final

ATHENS, Ga. – Third-seeded Oklahoma State scored four runs in the bottom of the ninth inning at the NCAA Athens Regional to knock off No. 7 national seed and host Georgia, 11-9, at Foley Field.   With the win, the Cowboys improved to 30-24 and advanced to the Regional championship round, where they will need to […]

Published

on


ATHENS, Ga. – Third-seeded Oklahoma State scored four runs in the bottom of the ninth inning at the NCAA Athens Regional to knock off No. 7 national seed and host Georgia, 11-9, at Foley Field.
 
With the win, the Cowboys improved to 30-24 and advanced to the Regional championship round, where they will need to defeat Duke twice to earn a Super Regional berth. UGA finished its season 43-17.
 
Kollin Ritchie and Brock Thompson each hit two-run home runs in the ninth, with Thompson’s opposite-field shot to left field providing the walk-off win.
 
Matthew Brown picked up his first collegiate win with a perfect inning of relief as he struck out the side with two runners in scoring position in the top of the ninth to set up the Cowboys for the comeback.
 
OSU starter Harrison Bodendorf worked five innings and allowed seven runs on six hits while striking out two.
 
The Cowboys jumped out to an early lead in its first at bat when Nolan Schubart smashed his 19th home run of the season, an opposite field solo shot over the wall in left field. The blast was the 59th of his career.
 
OSU added to its lead in the second. Alex Conover smashed his sixth homer of the season to right to make the score 2-0, and three batters later, Brayden Smith delivered a two-out RBI single to extend the advantage to three.
 
The lead did not hold up, however. In the third, UGA got a two-run homer from Slate Alford to make the score 3-2 before tying the game on an RBI double by Tre Phelps. The Bulldogs then went up 5-3 on a two-run homer off the bat of Christian Adams.
 
Trailing 7-3, the Pokes rallied to tie the score in the fifth. Two singles and a hit by pitch to open the inning loaded the bases, and a walk to Schubart brought home the first run. Up next, Ritchie picked up an RBI on a fielder’s choice, and Colin Brueggemann’s infield single plated OSU’s sixth run. The Cowboys knotted the score on a sacrifice fly off the bat of Ian Daugherty.
 
UGA regained the lead in the seventh when, with runners on first and second and two outs, Adams blooped a single into left field to make the score 8-7.
 
The Bulldogs tacked on another run in the eighth to take a 9-7 advantage.
 
In the decisive ninth, Schubart drew a leadoff walk before Ritchie stepped to the plate and drilled a pitch over the right-field wall to tie the score.
 
Following a Brueggemann single, the Bulldogs recorded two outs. But Thompson stepped to the plate and delivered an 0-1 pitch over the wall for his eighth homer of the season to set off the OSU celebration and keep its season alive.  
 



Link

Continue Reading

NIL

Oregon Ducks vs. Oklahoma Sooners Softball, Elimination Game

The Oregon Ducks face elimination in the Women’s College World Series for another night, and this time the Ducks will face the Oklahoma Sooners out of the SEC. Both Oregon and Oklahoma have one loss, meaning the loser of Sunday night’s matchup will be sent home while the winner stays alive to face Texas Tech. […]

Published

on


The Oregon Ducks face elimination in the Women’s College World Series for another night, and this time the Ducks will face the Oklahoma Sooners out of the SEC. Both Oregon and Oklahoma have one loss, meaning the loser of Sunday night’s matchup will be sent home while the winner stays alive to face Texas Tech.

The Ducks and the Sooners are set to square off at 4:12 p.m. PT from Devon Park in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma. The game will be broadcast on ESPN2.

After falling to UCLA in the first round of the WCWS, Oregon’s softball team beat Ole Miss in walk-off fashion and avoided elimination. The Ducks held a three-run lead early against the Rebels, but Ole Miss stormed back to tie the game in the 7th inning.

Oregon Ducks pitcher Lyndsey Grein (33) throws a pitch in the second inning against the Ole Miss Rebels during the NCAA Softb

May 30, 2025; Oklahoma City, OK, USA; Oregon Ducks pitcher Lyndsey Grein (33) throws a pitch in the second inning against the Ole Miss Rebels during the NCAA Softball Women’s College World Series at Devon Park. / Brett Rojo-Imagn Images

Oregon’s ace pitcher Lyndsey Grein pitched 9.1 innings and threw 96 pitches in the win over Ole Miss. How much will have she left against Oklahoma? Ducks pitcher Elise Solkosky has made relief appearances in both games of Oregon’s run in the Women’s College World Series.

The Ducks offense was stifled by UCLA pitcher Kaitlyn Terry, who limited Oregon to two runs over seven innings. Against Ole Miss, Oregon’s bats came up with six runs while taking advantage of some errors by the Rebels defense. The Ducks have one of the highest scoring offenses in the nation, but will they be able to perform against Oklahoma?

The Sooners have an ace of their own in Sam Landry, who shut down the Tennessee Volunteers in her first game of this year’s WCWS. Landry allowed one earned run over seven innings, a complete game. In Oklahoma’s loss to Texas, Landry pitched six innings and allowed three earned runs, but the Sooners offense was unable to take advantage.

MORE: Dillon Gabriel Turns Heads At Cleveland Browns OTAs With Shedeur Sanders

MORE: Oregon Ducks Lose Commitment From 5-Star Richard Wesley in 2026 Recruiting Class

MORE: Cleveland Browns Predicted To Start Rookie Quarterback NFL Week 10: Dillon Gabriel, Shedeur Sanders?

As a result, Oklahoma meets Oregon in the loser’s bracket. The Sooners’ program carries a championship pedigree under the leadership of coach Patty Gasso. The Sooners have won the last four national titles in softball.

Ducks coach Melyssa Lombardi spent years with Oklahoma’s program, including her time as a player, and she won four championships herself with the Sooners. Now, Lombardi is set to face her former program as she builds one of her own in Oregon.

“It’s a celebration. She has been with me for over 20 years. Like a sister to me. (Oregon assistant coach) Sydney Romero is one of my all time favorites. (Ducks assissant coach) Sam Marder worked with us. We know them very well. It’s going to be a battle. We’re both fighting for our teams,” Gasso said before the game against the Ducks. “But at the same time, there’s absolute mutual respect, which feels good in this game. To feel like you can feel that way against a team that you’re playing against.”

Oklahoma coach Patty Gasso talks with an official during a Women's College World Series softball game between the University

Oklahoma coach Patty Gasso talks with an official during a Women’s College World Series softball game between the University of Oklahoma Sooners (OU) and the Texas Longhorns at Devon Park in Oklahoma City, Saturday, May 31, 2025. Texas won 4-2. / BRYAN TERRY/THE OKLAHOMAN / USA TODAY NETWORK via Imagn Images

“I already know it’s going to be done professionally and the right way. That means a lot to me. If it’s not going to be us, I want it to be them. I’ll say that very clearly and out loud. They’ve lived in our program. And their program I think might mimic us a little bit by the way she’s coaching but I take that as a complete honor,” Gasso continued.



Link

Continue Reading

NIL

Some ‘what if’ scenarios for Michigan Football that could’ve changed everything

The Michigan football program has had its fair share of success the last few years. Even after a down season in 2024, it’s hard to argue against Michigan being one of (if not the) best programs in the sport over the last handful of years. Still, despite the success the Wolverines have had, there are […]

Published

on


The Michigan football program has had its fair share of success the last few years. Even after a down season in 2024, it’s hard to argue against Michigan being one of (if not the) best programs in the sport over the last handful of years.

Still, despite the success the Wolverines have had, there are plenty of places where things could have gone differently. As fans know, football can be a complicated sport where the mere bounce of the ball in a game can reshape the course of an entire season.

Last week, we took a look back through the recent history of Michigan’s men’s basketball program to see where things could have gone differently, and today we’ll be doing the same for the football program.

What if J.T. Barrett wasn’t given the first down in 2016?

The scene is Columbus, Ohio, Nov. 26, 2016. Up 27-24 in overtime, Michigan needed a stop on fourth-and-one to beat Ohio State for the first time since 2011. On the play, Ohio State quarterback J.T. Barrett was stopped right at the marker, and upon replay review, was given a first down. The Buckeyes scored a touchdown just one play later and won the game 30-27.

There’s no sense debating the call by the officials at this point, but how would history be different had it gone the other way? For starters, Michigan would have won, finished the season 11-1 overall and booked a trip to the Big Ten Championship to face Wisconsin. We can’t assume the Wolverines would have won, but they did beat the Badgers, 14-7, at the Big House earlier that year.

We can’t say for sure how things would have gone, but at the very least, Jim Harbaugh might have received less flak for being unable to beat the Buckeyes.

What if Michigan lost to Rutgers in 2020?

This will act as an interlude to our next scenario, but fans were likely sweating out the 48-42 overtime victory over Rutgers in 2020, something that could have been a big turning point for the program.

If the Wolverines had lost that game, their record would have fallen to 1-4 and the chances of Harbaugh making out of the season with a job seemed slim. Even by winning the game, he did little to convince fans he deserved to stick around. Nonetheless, Michigan held onto Harbaugh, but it’s fair to wonder how things might be different if it didn’t.

What if Jim Harbaugh left after 2020?

Any way you slice it, the 2020 season was a disaster. The Wolverines went 2-4 and looked uncompetitive in most games. At the time, the criticism of Harbaugh was at its peak. Another part of the equation was Harbaugh didn’t have a long-term contract to keep him in Ann Arbor beyond 2021, only fueling speculation he would soon be out the door.

Instead, Harbaugh signed a contract with a reduced salary, reflective of the underachievement to that point. His return would ultimately spur Michigan on to its major run of success from 2021-23. But how might things have transpired if he did leave?

Well, fans spent the fall and winter of 2020 sorting through potential head coaching candidates. From Luke Fickell to Matt Campbell, fans were envisioning a new future that probably wouldn’t have been so bright. Needless to say, Michigan made the right call in bringing Harbaugh back, as Fickell has underperformed — 13-13 in two seasons at Wisconsin — while Campbell has gone 29-23 at Iowa State since 2020.

What if literally anything went differently in the Fiesta Bowl?

For the truly masochistic fans, I urge you to go back and watch the highlights from Michigan’s loss to TCU in the College Football Playoff. You’ll find countless places where the tide of the game could have turned.

What if Donovan Edwards didn’t get chased down on the first play of the game? What if J.J. McCarthy didn’t throw two pick-sixes? What if Roman Wilson was given a touchdown instead of being ruled down right before the goal line? And what if Kalel Mullings didn’t fumble after that replay review of Wilson’s overturned touchdown? What if anybody could make a tackle on defense? We could go on and on.

The loss marked one of the bigger upsets in the four-team era of the CFP. If the Wolverines had won the game like many experts had predicted them to, they would’ve faced Georgia in the National Championship.

While Michigan might have been a better matchup for Georgia than TCU — it lost to Georgia 65-7 — I still wouldn’t have bet on Michigan to win. While a victory in the Fiesta Bowl would have been great, it probably wouldn’t have given the Wolverines all that much better a shot at winning the National Championship.

What if literally anything went differently in the Rose Bowl?

If the Fiesta Bowl featured many unfortunate events for Michigan, the Rose Bowl featured some favorable ones. What if McCarthy had been intercepted on the first play, or didn’t catch the pass from Edwards on the trick play? What if Michigan hadn’t flawlessly executed it’s legendary fourth-quarter drive? What if Jake Thaw let the ball bounce into the end zone?

As you can see, perhaps the most memorable win from the last five years might not have happened at all. Had the ball not bounced in Michigan’s favor in this game, the program would have been looking at a third straight semifinal exit, and the legacies of Harbaugh and many legendary players like McCarthy, Blake Corum, Mike Sainristil and others would look much different without a national championship on their resumes.

It’s fair to wonder if Harbaugh or any of his players would have opted to try and run it back in 2024 for another shot at a title, but I’ll settle for winning it all in 2023.

What if Michigan didn’t upset Ohio State in 2024?

I guess we’ll never know…



Link

Continue Reading

Most Viewed Posts

Trending