NIL
Post-combine list includes some newcomers
2025 NBA Draft Combine winners: Raynaud, Lendeborg and Byrd
These 2025 NBA draft prospects are the biggest winners from the NBA Draft Combine
With the NBA draft lottery (hello, Dallas Mavericks) and draft combine over, teams and prospects now turn their attention to pro days and mostly private workouts where even more impressions are made.
Those impressions lead to decisions at the June 25-26 NBA draft. Maybe it makes the difference between getting selected 16th or 13th.
Also, per NCAA rules, underclassmen have until Wednesday, May 28, to withdraw from the draft and retain NCAA eligibility. Among potential first-round picks who are weighing the decision to remain in the draft or return to college are Alex Condon, who won a title with Florida in April; Tahaad Pettiford, who helped Auburn reach the Final Four; and Yaxel Lendeborg, who played for UAB in 2024-25 but has pledged to play at Michigan next season if he returns to college.
Here’s a look at USA TODAY’s post-combine NBA mock draft:
(Age listed is age at time of the draft; for U.S. college players, height (without shoes) and weight taken at NBA draft combine)
2025 NBA mock draft
1. Dallas Mavericks: Cooper Flagg, Duke
- Freshman, guard-forward, 6-7¾ , 221, 18 years old
- 2024-25 stats: 19.2 ppg, 7.5 rpg, 4.2 apg, 1.4 spg, 1.4 bpg, 48.1% FG, 38.5% 3PT, 84% FT
The do-it-all young star led the Blue Devils in scoring, rebounding, assists and steals. Flagg has outstanding footwork, especially in the low post. He can use either hand on shots in the paint, knows how to run plays, can hit catch-and-shoot 3s and is an active weakside defender. Flagg, who added more muscle since the start of the year, is a physical player who initiates contact, is confident and plays with force when necessary. He led Duke to an impressive season, which includes the ACC regular-season title, ACC tournament title and Final Four appearance. He had 30 points, seven assists and six rebounds in a regional semifinal victory against Arizona and 16 points and nine rebounds in a regional final against Alabama. Flagg had 27 points, seven rebounds, three blocks and two steals in a Final Four loss to Houston.
2. San Antonio Spurs: Dylan Harper, Rutgers
- Freshman, guard, 6-4½ , 213, 19
- 2024-25 stats: 19.4 ppg, 4.6 rpg, 4.0 apg, 1.4 spg, 48.4% FG, 33.3% 3PT, 75% FT
The lefty stroke will remind some of Jalen Brunson, but Harper has far more size at 6-6 and tremendous length with a wingspan of 6-foot-10. Harper’s best asset at the next level might be his versatility to run point and play off the ball. In Rutgers’ lone Big Ten tournament game, Harper had 27 points (9-for-21 shooting), eight rebounds, eight assists, two steals and two blocks in a double-overtime loss to Southern California.
3. Philadelphia 76ers: Ace Bailey, Rutgers
- Freshman, guard-forward, 6-7½ , 202, 18
- 2024-25 stats: 17.6 ppg, 7.2 rpg, 1.3 apg, 1.3 bpg, 46% FG, 34.6% 3PT, 69.2% FT
Bailey is a hyper-athletic wing with length and size coming into a league that prioritizes players built exactly the way he is with exactly the skill set he has: an effortless and reliable shot and an attack-first mentality with an ability to finish at the rim. Needs to improve as a playmaker on the pass and free throws. But even when offense isn’t easy, he remains active on defense. He had 17 points, seven rebounds, three steals and one block in season-ending loss to USC.
4. Charlotte Hornets: VJ Edgecombe, Baylor
- Freshman, guard, 6-4, 193, 19
- 2024-25 stats: 15.0 ppg, 5.6 rpg, 3.2 apg, 2.1 spg, 43.6% FG, 34% 3PT, 78.2% FT
The Bahamian native has displayed his athleticism, has shown he can be explosive and has an elite knack for steals. He will be able to contribute at the NBA level and can be aggressive at the point of attack. The freshman is a high-level off-ball scorer but can improve when it comes to on-ball scoring. Edgecombe logged significant minutes at the end of the season. He had 16 points, six rebounds and one steal in a NCAA Tournament second-round loss to Duke.
5. Utah Jazz: Tre Johnson, Texas
- Freshman, guard, 6-4¾, 190, 19
- 2024-25 stats: 19.9 ppg, 3.1 rpg, 2.7 apg, 42.7% FG, 39.7% 3PT, 87.1% FT
Johnson is a natural shooter and scorer. He does well when scoring on the move and is a decent playmaker for his size. He still needs to work on his ability to make plays for others. He must also work on his strength and his explosiveness in order to assert himself as a finisher at the rim. He had three 30-point games in the past two months, including 39 against Arkansas on Feb. 26. He had 23 points and six rebounds in an NCAA Tournament loss to Xavier.
6. Washington Wizards: Jeremiah Fears, Oklahoma
- Freshman, guard, 6-2½, 180, 18
- 2024-25 stats: 17.1 ppg, 4.1 apg, 4.1 rpg, 1.6 spg, 43.4% FG, 28.4% 3PT, 85.1% FT
Solid start to his freshman season; quick on the dribble; has strength going to the rim and can finish; operates well in the pick-and-roll as a scorer and passer; needs to improve his 3-point shot but potential is there. Fears scored a season-high 31 points and added five assists and four rebounds in a win against ranked Missouri. Fears had a strong SEC tournament, producing 29 points, six rebounds and five steals plus five turnovers in a victory against Georgia and 28 points, five assists, four rebounds and three steals (just one turnover) in a loss to Kentucky. He generated 20 points, five rebounds and four assists in a NCAA Tournament first-round loss to UConn.
7. New Orleans Pelicans: Kon Knueppel, Duke
- Freshman, guard-forward, 6-5, 219, 19
- 2024-25 stats: 14.4 ppg, 4.0 rpg, 2.7 apg, 47.9% FG, 40.6% 3PT, 91.4% FT
He can ignite an offense with his 3-point shot, thanks to an efficient motion, seemingly always ready to receive the ball in his shooting pocket. He can also lace shots from midrange, take care of the ball and is money on free throws. In the ACC tournament, Knueppel averaged 21 points (28 against Georgia Tech) and shot 48.6% from the field, stepping up with Flagg injured. He averaged 20.5 points and shot 11-for-22 from the field (4-for-6 on 3s) in two regional games. He had 21 points, five rebounds and five assists in an Elite Eight victory against Alabama, and 16 points and seven rebounds in a Final Four loss to Houston.
8. Brooklyn Nets: Khaman Maluach, Duke
- Freshman, center, 7-0½, 253, 18
- 2024-25 stats: 8.6 ppg, 6.6 rpg, 1.3 bpg, 71.2% FG, 76.6% FT
Playing about 20 minutes per game, Maluach is a mobile big who excels in pick-and-rolls and has the hands to catch lobs for easy dunks; soft touch at the rim; shot-blocker/rim protector; active on the offensive glass; will get stronger and has a great aptitude for the game, learning concepts quickly. In four NCAA Tournament games, Maluach, who played for South Sudan at the 2024 Paris Olympics, averages 11.5 points, 4.2 rebounds, 2.0 blocks and shoots 86.9% from the field (20-for-23) and had 14 points and nine rebounds in Elite Eight victory against Alabama. He struggled to make an impact in the Final Four loss to Houston with just six points and no rebounds.
9. Toronto Raptors: Kasparas Jakucionis, Illinois
- Freshman, guard, 6-4¾, 205, 19
- 2024-25 stats: 15.0 ppg, 5.7 rpg, 4.7 apg, 44% FG, 31.8% 3PT, 84.5% FT
Jakucionis is a playmaker – a scorer and passer. He has range with a nice 3-ball, can shoot off the dribble from deep, including on step-back 3s, and looks for an open teammate when he draws multiple defenders. Jakucionis sees the court well with savvy passes and likes to get to the rim for layups. But he can be turnover-prone. He struggled offensively at the end of the season, shooting 32.5% from the field and committing 24 turnovers in the final four games. He had 16 points, 10 assists and nine rebounds in a first-round NCAA Tournament victory against Xavier.
10. Houston Rockets: Collin Murray-Boyles, South Carolina
- Sophomore, forward, 6-6½, 239, 20
- 2024-25 stats: 16.8 ppg, 8.3 rpg, 2.4 agp, 1.5 spg, 1.3 bpg, 58.6% FG, 26.5% 3PT, 70.7% FT
Although he’s a bit undersized for a power forward, Murray-Boyles plays with intense effort and determination, which will very quickly please his NBA coaches. He also has plenty of strength to finish at the rim and was the SEC’s No. 3 rebounder. Murray-Boyles had 35 points and seven rebounds against Arkansas late in the regular season and had 20 points and 12 rebounds in a loss to Arkansas in the SEC tournament.
11. Portland Trail Blazers: Derik Queen, Maryland
- Freshman, center, 6-9¼, 248, 20
- 2024-25 stats: 16.5 ppg, 9.0 rpg, 1.9 apg, 1.1 spg, 1.1 bpg, 52.6% FG, 76.6% FT
An active, physical big man, Queen has a soft touch around the rim with either hand but has a power game, too. He can run the court and handle the basketball well for a power forward-center. He is another potential first-round pick with good hands and footwork and has the mechanics to become a shooter who can stretch the floor. Queen had 27 points, five rebounds and two steals in a Sweet 16 loss to eventual champion Florida.
12. Chicago Bulls: Noa Essengue, Ratiopharm Ulm (Germany)
- Forward, 6-10, 198, 18
- 2024-25 stats: 10.8 ppg, 4.8 rpg, 1.1 apg, 51.6% FG, 27% 3PT, 70.5% FT
The next forward with elite finishing ability to come out of France, Essengue figures to be more of a developmental prospect, but his size, instincts at the rim and plus-defensive ability could make him a star if he bulks up.
13. Atlanta Hawks: Egor Demin, BYU
- Freshman, forward, 6-8¼, 199, 19
- 2024-25 stats: 10.3 ppg, 5.4 apg, 3.8 rpg, 1.2 spg, 41% FG, 27.1% 3PT, 67.5% FT
The Russian is a playmaker who can make quick decisions and facilitate for others. Demin is the size of a wing player but has guard-like skills. On defense, he uses his length to his advantage while forcing turnovers and being active in passing lanes. His shooting efficiency is a concern. Demin had difficulty with his offense as the season progressed. He had just three points with four turnovers, three assists and three rebounds in a Big 12 conference tournament victory against Iowa State and six points on 2-for-9 shooting (1-for-7 on 3s) with four assists and five turnovers in a conference tournament loss to Houston. In three NCAA tournament games, he averaged 13.7 points, 5.7 assists and 4.7 rebounds and was 15-for-35 from the field.
14. San Antonio Spurs: Carter Bryant, Arizona
- Freshman, forward, 6-6½, 215, 19
- 2024-25 stats: 6.5 ppg, 4.1 rpg, 1.0 apg, 1.0 bpg, 46% FG, 37.1% 3PT, 69.5% FT
The athletic forward provides a solid combination of strength and fluidity. He has lateral quickness to stay in front of the ball and the ability to block shots. He can still improve on his technique as a finisher and in scoring efficiency. He will get an increased opportunity to impress scouts and executives at the draft combine if he enters the draft. Bryant scored 12 points and collected five rebounds and three blocks in 20 minutes in a victory against Akron in the NCAA Tournament.
15. Oklahoma City Thunder: Asa Newell, Georgia
- Freshman, forward, 6-9, 224, 19
- 2024-25 stats: 15.4 ppg, 6.9 rpg, 1.0 spg, 1.0 bpg, 54.3% FG, 29.2% 3PT, 74.8% FT
Based off of his size, Newell wouldn’t appear to be as quick and fluid as he is, which should make him an instant threat in pick-and-roll situations. He was one of the lone bright spots for the Bulldogs in a loss against No. 1 Auburn with a team-high 20 points. His scoring dipped at the end of the regular season, however, he had 20 points and eight rebounds in a first-round NCAA Tournament loss to Gonzaga.
16. Orlando Magic: Jase Richardson, Michigan State
- Freshman, guard, 6-0½, 178, 19
- 2024-25 stats: 12.1 ppg, 3.3 rpg, 1.9 apg, 49.3% FG, 41.2% 3PT, 83.6% FT
Richardson improved as the season progressed and turned into the Spartans’ steady hand with the basketball as a shooter (inside and out) and facilitator. He is an active defender with surprising bouts of athleticism. He also has a knack for collecting rebounds, big plays and poise under pressure. He had an up-and-down NCAA Tournament in four games – 5-for-11 shooting and 15 points against Bryant, 1-for-10 shooting against New Mexico, 20 points on 6-for-8 shooting against Ole Miss, and 4-for-13 shooting against Auburn.
17. Minnesota Timberwolves: Danny Wolf, Michigan
- Junior, forward-center, 6-10½, 252, 21
- 2024-25 stats: 13.2 ppg, 9.7 rpg, 3.6 apg, 1.4 bpg, 49.7% FG, 33.6% 3PT, 59.4% FT
The Yale transfer is shooting up draft boards thanks to his fluid scoring and play-making portfolio in the package of a 7-foot stretch big. Wolf played point guard at times this season for the Wolverines just like he played center. His handles make him a threat as the initiator in pick-and-roll actions and his range should translate to the NBA. Wolf had 21 points and 14 rebounds against Maryland in the Big Ten tournament semifinals and shot 52.9% from the field as the Wolverines won the conference tourney. He had 20 points and six rebounds in a NCAA regional semifinals loss to Auburn.
18. Washington Wizards: Liam McNeeley, UConn
- Freshman, forward, 6-6¾, 215, 19
- 2024-25 stats: 14.5 ppg, 6.0 rpg, 2.3 apg, 38.1% FG, 31.7% 3PT, 86.6% FT
What McNeeley may lack in fluid athleticism, he more than makes up for with a smooth, natural shot and knack for drawing fouls and getting to the free throw line. He also has a quick release and plenty of range to suggest that he should get early minutes. He bounced back since suffering an ankle injury New Year’s Day that had sidelined him for a few weeks. McNeeley struggled with his shot at times down the stretch. In a Big East tournament loss to Creighton, McNeeley had 13 points on 6-for-20 shooting (0-for-5 on 3-pointers), and in his final eight games before the NCAA Tournament, he shot 34.1% from the field and 28.2% on 3s. In two NCAA Tournament games, he was 8-for-29 from the field, including 3-of-16 on 3s.
19. Brooklyn Nets: Nolan Traore, Saint-Quentin (France)
- Guard, 6-4, 175, 19
- 2024-25 stats: 12 ppg, 4.8 apg, 1.9 rpg, 40.9% FG, 31.4% 3PT, 72.8% FT
Traore is a point guard who can score and pass and has court awareness but also a propensity for bad turnovers. He’s quick, can get to the rim and is comfortable taking his defender off the dribble. Needs to work on his shooting efficiency, especially on 3s. His brother, Armel, was on a two-way contract with the Los Angeles and South Bay Lakers before being waived in February.
20. Miami Heat: Thomas Sorber, Georgetown
- Freshman, forward-center, 6-9¼, 263, 19
- 2024-25 stats: 14.5 ppg, 8.5 rpg, 2.4 apg, 2.0 spg, 53.2% FG, 72.4% FT
The standout freshman required surgery to repair a foot injury suffered Feb. 15 and missed the rest of the season. That could alter his plans for the draft, but Sorber is a stellar inside threat who’s just as comfortable cutting to the basket on pick-and-rolls as he is backing down opponents. His rebounding and rim protection will make him an asset, as he continues to grow into his frame.
21. Utah Jazz: Joan Beringer, KK Cedevita (Adriatic League)
- Forward-center, 6-10, 230, 18
- 2024-25 stats: 5.0 ppg, 4.6 rpg, 1.4 bpg, 61.5% FG, 58.4% FT
Beringer has gained traction among NBA scouts and executives as a mobile big man who can run the pick-and-roll as a screener on offense and guard the pick-and-roll. He doesn’t have a lot of experience but his potential, especially as a rim protector, has made him a first-round prospect. Another player who has improved throughout the season.
22. Atlanta Hawks: Nique Clifford, Colorado State
- Fifth-year graduate season, guard, 6-5¼, 202, 23
- 2024-25 stats: 18.9 ppg, 9.6 rpg, 4.4 apg, 1.2 spg, 49.6% FG, 37.7% 3PT, 77.7% FT
Clifford is a versatile wing who does a lot of things – scoring, rebounding, passing and defending. He has a quick burst on drives to the basket and can finish with force or finesse. He logged big minutes for Colorado State and was excellent in the Rams’ final six games before the NCAA tournament, posting 25.3 points, 7.8 rebounds, 5.2 assists and 1.5 steals and shooting 60% from the field, including 54.8% on 3s. He had 36 points against Boise State at the end of the regular season and recorded two double-doubles in the Mountain West tournament. Clifford had 21 points, seven rebounds, six assists and two blocks in an NCAA tournament second-round loss to Maryland.
23. Indiana Pacers: Will Riley, Illinois
Freshman, forward, 6-8¼, 186, 19
2024-25 stats: 12.6 ppg, 4.1 rpg, 2.2 apg, 43.2% FG, 32.6% 3PT, 72.4% FT
Great size for a shooting guard who can make 3s and find open teammates. Like many, looks for offensive rebounds. His shot is a work in progress but the mechanics are there and he improved as a shooter and scorer as the season progressed. He shot 37-for-72 (51.4%) from the field and averaged 16.3 points in the Illini’s final six games.
24. Oklahoma City Thunder: Rasheer Fleming, Saint Joseph’s
- Junior, forward, 6-8¼, 232, 20
- 2024-25 stats: 14.75 ppg, 8.5 rpg, 1.5 bpg, 1.4 spg, 1.3 apg, 53.1% FG, 39% 3PT, 74.3% FT
Fleming is a mobile forward who plays a physical game and has strong footwork to finesse his way around defenders. He likes to get easy buckets in transition, his 3-point percentage in nearly five attempts per game is encouraging and he is valuable in pick-and-rolls as the screener. Defensively, he deflects passes and can protect the rim. Fleming averaged 18.8 points and 7.7 rebounds and shot 58.9% in the last six regular-season Atlantic 10 Conference contests.
25. Orlando Magic: Ben Saraf, Ratiopharm Ulm (Germany)
- Guard, 6-6, 200, 19
- 2024-25 stats: 12.2 ppg, 4.3 apg, 2.6 rpg, 1.2 spg, 45.5% FG, 28.6% 3PT, 72.7% FT
He’s just as comfortable knocking down a step-back jumper, finding creases in the paint and dishing the ball with excellent vision. He may need some time to develop as he adjusts to NBA athletes, but his length and size at point guard will make him an intriguing prospect.
26. Brooklyn Nets: Yaxel Lendeborg, UAB
- Senior, forward, 6-8½, 235, 22
- 2024-25 stats: 17.7 ppg, 11.4 rpg, 4.2 apg, 52.2% FG, 35.7% 3PT, 75.7% FT
Lendeborg is active defensively, likes to attack in transition, is active in the paint and cuts to the rim and looks for the ball. Possesses good size and strength for his position and initiates contact. His shooting percentage inside and outside the 3-point line (specifically as catch-and-shoot on 3s) are good signs for the forward from Puerto Rico. Depending on his draft evaluation, Lendeborg, the 2024-25 American Athletic Conference player of the year, could end up at Michigan for another season of college basketball.
27. Brooklyn Nets: Hugo Gonzalez, Real Madrid (Spain)
- Guard-forward, 6-7, 207, 19
- 2024-25 stats: 3.2 ppg, 1.7 rpg, 41% FG, 28.1% 3PT, 73.9% FT
One of Europe’s top young NBA prospects, Gonzalez is a versatile wing with the ability to score inside and out. He can handle the basketball, pass and is a surprising shot-blocker. He’s still raw.
28. Boston Celtics: Walter Clayton Jr., Florida
- Senior, guard, 6-2, 199, 22
- 2024-25 stats: 18.3 ppg, 4.2 apg, 3.7 rpg, 1.2 spg, 44.8% FG, 38.6% 3PT, 85.7% FT
Named the Most Outstanding Player of the Final Four, Clayton had 34 points in the national semifinals against Auburn and 11 points, seven assists and five rebounds in the championship victory against Houston. He also scored 30 points in a regional final against Texas Tech and was 21-for-42 from the field in the Gators’ final three games. Has range on 3-point shots and can shoot off the dribble or pass but needs to improve as a playmaker and defender.
29. Phoenix Suns: Noah Penda, Le Mans (France)
- Forward, 6-8, 225, 20
- 2024-25 stats: 10.2 ppg, 5.1 rpg, 2.7 apg, 1.3 spg, 45.8% FG, 34.7% 3PT, 67.9% FT
A solidly-built wing, Penda may not be the most explosive athlete, but he has flashed excellent footwork in the low block, has steady enough ball-handling abilities and can knock down 3s with relative efficiency. Penda has also shown that he can move well without the ball, often slashing through a defense on cuts for easy buckets. Improved as a shooter and scorer as the season progressed.
30. Los Angeles Clippers: Drake Powell, North Carolina
- Freshman, guard-forward, 6-5¼, 200, 19
- 2024-25 stats: 7.4 ppg, 3.4 rpg, 1.1 apg, 48.3% FG, 37.9% 3PT, 64.8% FT
Active on both ends of the court as a shot-blocker and physical and versatile defender, and as a player who likes to run the court, launch catch-and-shoot 3s and go one-on-one in the halfcourt. Playing on a deep team, especially on the perimeter, Powell doesn’t possess eye-popping offensive stats but his shooting stats reveal his potential. Was an efficient scorer in limited opportunities and can be a solid rebounder from the perimeter.
NIL
Let’s give Kirby Moore an immediate infusion of $5 million in NIL support

WASHINGTON STATE President Betsy Cantwell took to social media Friday evening to deliver as clear a picture as you’ll hear as to why support for NIL is critical not just to the success of Cougar football but to the entire athletic department and the broader university.
Just hours after WSU announced Kirby Moore as the new head coach of the Washington State football team with what is believed to be a five-year contract, Cantwell videotaped a two-minute message asking WSU alums and fans to help push NIL funding to new heights through the CAF’s tax-deductible coaches excellence funds.
“By now, you know we’ve announced a phenomenal new football coach,” she said. “He’s ready to lead us into winning in the new Pac-12 Conference. What will get us there and show the world that we are deadly serious about winning will be our willingness to give this coach the tools to win. And for us, that means building $5 million in new NIL support immediately to compete — a fund that acknowledges the modern world and says, we are ready. We are in it.
“We all know that NIL isn’t an option. It’s an essential tool today,” she added. “Whether we love it or not, it’s part of the game. But NIL isn’t just about keeping up. It’s about giving our Cougs every chance to excel on the field, in the classroom, and in life beyond sports. Your investment in NIL through the Cougar Athletic Fund helps us recruit, retain, and elevate our WSU student-athletes.”
Last month Cantwell told Cougfan.com that WSU Athletics needs to raise an additional $20 million per year for revenue sharing and NIL to compete at the highest levels of the new Pac-12, which kicks off in 2026.
Related: New Cougar coach Kirby Moore’s background remarkably similar to legendary Mike Price’s
“Athletics is the front porch of our university,” Cantwell noted in her Friday video. “It’s the place that draws people to us. That means that winning football leads to healthy sports across the spectrum, leads to higher enrollment, leads to a healthier WSU.
“So strong Cougar teams lift the entire WSU family. We boost pride, we boost enrollment, we boost national visibility. This is the moment for Cougs everywhere. Let’s hit $5 million together. Let’s set our new coach and our student -athletes up for success. Go to the Cougar Athletic Fund website and choose NIL. Do it now.”
You can watch her full commentary in the Twitter post embedded at the bottom of this story.
CANTWELL’S COMMENTS echoed remarks earlier in the day by former WSU and Seattle Seahawks standout Robbie Tobeck when he was asked for his reaction to Moore’s hiring.
“In this day and age, I don’t care how good your coach is, you need the resources to compete and win,” Tobeck said. “It’s imperative the university, regents and alums back up this program and give Kirby a chance to excel. If you want to boost enrollment, field a good football team. It’s time to step up to the plate and invest in winning.
“I’m talking about dominating the new conference and going to the playoffs. We have an opportunity at WSU if we invest. We should be the bell cow of this new conference and we need to come out of the gate quickly.”
Related: Instant reaction from WSU luminaries to Kirby Moore’s hiring at WSU
INSUFFICIENT NIL SUPPORT was a growing frustration for former WSU coach Jimmy Rogers and his staff. While WSU has kept the numbers tight, Rogers apparently shared them with his new athletic director at Iowa State, Jamie Pollard, who somehow felt at liberty this week to disclose that Rogers told him WSU had a $2.5 million NIL budget in 2025. That number is believed to be the combined total of WSU’s revenue sharing program and the fundraising efforts of the independent NIL organization Cougar Collective.
At the CougsFirst! Show in Spokane last month, Cantwell told WSU partisans that “we’re at the bottom of every team coming into the Pac for football in NIL. We’re at the bottom. We cannot stay there and compete and win.”
She added, “We must be winners, we must, in football, within four years (sit atop the Pac-12) because that is the time that every single media rights contract across all of college football, every conference, is up for grabs again,” she said.
Cougar Nation, the time is now! Success starts with $5M in NIL support to recruit, retain, and elevate student-athletes—setting the stage for a winning future in the Pac-12. #GoCougs
Support: https://t.co/nJgxBwVXgr pic.twitter.com/6s3Apt3DsX
— WSU Office of the President (@WSU_Cougar_Pres) December 13, 2025
Also from CF.C: Why the ‘front porch’ of WSU, athletics, is more important than ever
NIL
$3 million college football QB benefits from head coach firing: per Insider
After Michigan terminated head coach Sherrone Moore “for cause,” the program now faces immediate roster and reputation questions, most pressingly the status of true-freshman quarterback Bryce Underwood.
Underwood, the class of 2025 No. 1 recruit, committed to Michigan in December 2024 with an NIL package reportedly valued at around $3 million, among the largest in college football, helping swing national recruiting attention to Ann Arbor.
Moore’s firing followed an internal investigation that the athletic department said found “credible evidence” of an inappropriate relationship; Michigan named associate head coach Biff Poggi interim head coach for the Wolverines’ Dec. 31 Cheez-It Citrus Bowl.
On CBS Sports HQ, Chris Hummer suggested that Moore’s dismissal creates an opening to “reset” the quarterback-staff relationship, arguing a coaching change could be a good thing for Underwood’s development and future at Michigan.
“There was an awareness around Michigan that Bryce Underwood had a bit of discontentment with the offense. So, this change might actually provide an opportunity for Michigan to reset that relationship a little bit and find something that fits for Bryce Underwood’s vision of offense and also fits for the future of Michigan football.”

Underwood started as a true freshman and posted 2,229 passing yards, nine passing TDs, and six interceptions during the 2025 regular season, while adding 323 rushing yards and five rushing TDs.
His dual-threat ability was a key factor in Michigan’s 9-3 (7-2 Big Ten) finish, highlighted by a five-game win streak before a 27–9 loss to rival Ohio State to close the regular season.
Underwood flipped his high-profile recruitment from LSU to Michigan in November 2024 and signed in the early period, a move widely reported to be tied to a historic NIL package orchestrated by Michigan’s primary collective.
As for who might replace Moore, national outlets have floated a wide board of potential candidates, including established Power Five coaches such as Alabama’s Kalen DeBoer, as well as offensive architects known for quarterback development, like Arizona State’s Kenny Dillingham.
Whoever’s hired will need to sell both winning and a clear developmental plan to keep Underwood from entertaining portal approaches, notably reported interest from LSU and others.
Read More at College Football HQ
- $29 million college football coach surges as favorite to replace Sherrone Moore at Michigan
- $1.3 million college football coach reportedly accepts head coaching job
- First-team All-Conference WR enters college football transfer portal
- College football program loses 11 players to transfer portal
NIL
Heisman finalist reveals why major college football program declined bowl game
The decision by Notre Dame to decline playing in a bowl game turned out to be one of the most-discussed choices made by any school in the 2025 college football season.
Now, one of the team’s most talented players is going public with why they decided to forgo the postseason entirely after missing the College Football Playoff.
Notre Dame running back and Heisman Trophy finalist Jeremiyah Love says the players were the deciding factor in ending their season.
Notre Dame made a team decision
“It was kind of a full team decision, full consensus decision,” Love said on SportsCenter.
“Our captains asked all of the players that they could, you know, what they think about the bowl games and things like that. And we all came to a consensus, or final decision, that we didn’t think that playing in that bowl game would really represent our 2025 football team in the right way.
“Because we feel like our team was just very special throughout the year, we did a lot of great things, and in that bowl game, a lot of people are going to opt out. A lot of people are just going to not play, or have their own plans … which, rightfully so. They have that right.”
Notre Dame was left out of the playoff
Notre Dame looked poised to take one of the dozen places in the College Football Playoff, but the selection committee reversed course on the last day, and swapped it out for Miami instead.
While most observers agreed in theory with that move since Miami beat Notre Dame this season, the timing of the decision and perceived lack of an explanation as to why then and not before, left the Irish enraged.
Enough to decline playing any bowl game at all.
“We didn’t feel like that team that would go into that bowl game was a great representation of how special this 2025 football team was,” Love said.
“So we all came to a consensus of, you know, we don’t want to put this team in a bad light because we feel like it was a great team.”
He added: “We’re not saying playing in a bowl game would put us in a bad light, but it just wouldn’t be the best representation of our team. So that ultimately led us to come into that decision.”
What Jeremiyah Love has done for Notre Dame
Love was a crucial element in the success Notre Dame had on the field that put them in playoff contention in the first place.
The running back had 199 carries for 1,372 yards and 18 touchdowns on the ground, catching 27 passes for 280 more yards and another 3 touchdowns.
His 21 total touchdowns set a new single-season Notre Dame record, surpassing Jerome Bettis.
But that could be the last time we see him on the field in the gold helmet given the Irish will not play again this season, and if he decides to enter the NFL Draft this spring.
Read more from College Football HQ
NIL
CNN points out ‘cultural problems’ at historic college football program
Scandal is an inevitable thread in the fabric of college football. Pretty much every major school as waded through one or two notable scandals involving administrators, coaches or players on a particular team. But there’s one Big Ten school, and college football program, who might be the new “Scandal U.”
That was a popular phrase around Louisville, KY in regard to the Cardinals’ run of scandals that included mismanaged funds by a university president, a strippers-in-the-dorms basketball scandal, an FBI probe, a playbook-stealing scandal called Wakey-Leaks (after Wake Forest) and the list goes on. Well, the Ville can now mover over after getting their act together in the 2020s, because Michigan is the new big bad rulebreaker in college athletics.
In light of Michigan head football coach Sherrone Moore’s firing this week, one of the largest news outlets in America, CNN, decided to do dig into the noticeably high number of scandals that have rocked Michigan of late. Of course, Moore was fired, for cause, do to an inappropriate relationship with a staffer. But he’s only the latest in a long line of Michigan men who’ve gotten their hands a bit dirty.
CNN noted the following occurrences all within the Michigan athletics department over the last few years:
Michigan Scandal Rundown
- Head football coach Sherrone Moore was fired over an inappropriate relationship with a staffer, then later arrested the same night he was fired.
- Head football coach Jim Harbaugh was suspended for several games during the 2023 national championship season over recruiting violations.
- Head football coach Jim Harbaugh left college football after 2023 with a 10-year show cause, four years of probation for Michigan, plus millions in fines over a sign-stealing scandal that dominated the entire 2023 college football news cycle.
- Football assistant Connor Stalions was let go for his very direct involvement in organizing and enacting the sign-stealing scandal.
- Head basketball coach Juwan Howard was suspended for slapping an opposing assistant coach during a handshake line and then fired after that season.
- Head hockey coach Mel Pearson, was not retained after investigations discovered the program urged athletes to lie on COVID tests and also had reports of verbal assaults on female staff members.
- Football assistant Matt Weiss was let go after it was discovered that he was hacking into students’ accounts to steal private photos of them.
That’s a tornado of bad ripping through Ann Arbor over just a couple of seasons. And while the basketball and hockey stories were tough situations, most of these scandalous missteps have come from the football program. According to CNN, there’s just one big culture problem under athletic director Warde Manuel.
CNN notes deeper problems with UM athletics

“People associated with Michigan athletics have told CNN that they believe there is a cultural problem, if not of indifference, certainly of arrogance,” they wrote. Going beyond just the bad behavior from people hired by Michigan, CNN reports that the school’s firing process itself raises major red flags.
“A source familiar with the matter said that Manuel dismissed Moore without anyone from human resources present, and – while that is not required – it is standard behavior at most companies,” CNN added, which is true, especially for a situation like Moore. In fact, he’s the example of why HR is used in that capacity, to maybe prevent something messy from transpiring afterward, which is exactly what happened.
Perhaps 2026 can offer a new day for Michigan. The Jim Harbaugh era ended with raging success on the field but has left a disastrous wake. With Moore now out, the Wolverines can start anew and bring in a head coach completely severed from the Harbaugh era and the baggage it brought.
More on College Football HQ
NIL
Buffs football’s pursuit of ‘powerhouse’ status is unrealistic
The University of Colorado is a remarkable place. It sits at the foot of the Flatirons, draws students from around the world, and shapes the state’s scientific, cultural and economic life more than almost any other institution. I have spent a lifetime connected to this university, and I say this as someone who cares deeply about its success: CU probably will never be a “sustained” national football powerhouse. And that’s not an insult. It’s an honest acknowledgment of the landscape we now live in and, if anything, a plea that we stop chasing a mirage that drains time, money and energy from what CU actually does best.

Let me be clear: CU can have great seasons. It can produce electrifying moments, top-10 rankings, thrilling Saturdays at Folsom Field (hopefully not at 8:00 p.m.) and the kind of storylines that make the country look west for a couple of weeks. But a powerhouse, the kind that reloads every year, bulldozes competition, outspends everyone and expects to contend for national titles as a matter of routine, is a different category altogether. And Colorado simply doesn’t have the structural ingredients to be competitive at a very high level every year.
Start with geography. The equation is simple: football powerhouses sit atop enormous recruiting bases. Texas, Georgia, Florida and Ohio each produce dozens of blue-chip recruits every year. Alabama has no major in-state competition and can pull from the entire Southeast. Colorado produces a handful of elite prospects, usually fewer than five. You can’t build a perennial top 10 program when your home state gives you a roster the size of a pickup basketball team. You have to fly everywhere, fight everyone and overpay for out-of-state talent just to stay competitive.
Then consider stadium economics. Folsom is one of the most beautiful venues in America, but beauty doesn’t pay the bills. At just over 50,000 seats, it isn’t even in the top 50 nationally. Meanwhile, the schools we’re comparing ourselves against have 85,000 to 105,000-seat cathedrals humming with revenue: premium clubs, suites, donor boxes, end-zone complexes. That difference alone produces tens of millions of dollars in additional annual operating revenue. CU will never be able to replicate that scale in Boulder, nor should it try.
Which brings us to finances. Even before the current deficit, CU’s athletic budget has hovered around $140 million, going up recently toward $160 million. That sounds large until you look around. Ohio State is over $290 million. Texas is not far behind. Georgia and Alabama are in the same orbit. LSU just hired a coach for $91 million in a multi-year deal — at a public institution. This is not a market CU can play in. It’s not even in the same country.
And now we’ve entered the branding (NIL) era, a world where the top programs spend $20-40 million annually not on coaching, not on facilities, but on the players themselves. Colorado’s donor base, corporate landscape, and statewide culture simply do not support that kind of annual fundraising. We have generous donors, but not South East Conference (SEC) style or Big-Ten boosters who treat Saturdays as a religion. NIL branding is not a temporary trend; it is the defining financial mechanism of modern college football. And CU is on the wrong side of the arms race. Maybe one area of hope with raising the needed money to be competitive is in a third-party private equity agreement. The University of Utah’s athletic department is about to create a new partnership with a private equity firm that could generate an estimated $500 million in revenue.
Culture matters too. Boulder is a place people choose for lifestyle, for mountains, for climate, for academics, for entrepreneurship. This isn’t Tuscaloosa, Columbus or Baton Rouge, where football saturates daily life and where a losing season is treated as a civic crisis. CU students disperse to ski slopes, hiking trails and concerts. Faculty are nationally recognized researchers who did not come to Boulder to live inside the roar of a football machine. That’s not a criticism, it’s precisely what makes Boulder special. But it’s also why Colorado may never be, and should never try to be, an Alabama or Ohio State of the Rockies.
And even in the years when CU succeeds, its success carries its own penalty. Bigger programs simply poach CU’s coaches, coordinators, strength trainers, analysts and recruiters. They can double or triple salaries with little effort. Sustained powerhouses rely on stability and pipelines of talent behind the talent. CU is a destination when things go well, not a home you stay at for decades.
So where does that leave us?
It leaves me with a simple conclusion: CU should aim to be good, competitive, exciting, fiscally healthy and academically aligned, not an imitator chasing a model that doesn’t fit our mission or our reality. The pursuit of “powerhouse” status isn’t just unrealistic; it distorts priorities and pressures the institution to behave in ways that undermine its purpose.
Colorado is at its best when it embraces what it truly is: a world-class research university with a vibrant campus, a beautiful stadium and a football program that can surprise the country every now and then. That is more than enough. It is something to be proud of. And it is infinitely more sustainable than pretending Boulder sits on the same tectonic plates as Austin, Columbus, Tuscaloosa or Athens.
We can love CU football passionately, without insisting it become something it cannot be. That is not cynicism but is realism, spoken with love, for the place that has shaped so much of my life.
Go Buffs!
Jim Martin is a former regent, past chair of CU’s athletic subcommittee, and adjunct law professor, having taught Sports and the Law. Martin regularly provides presentations to various groups on the topic: “The Wild West of Today’s College Athletics.” He can be reached at jimmartinesq@gmail.com.
To send a letter to the editor about this article, submit online or check out our guidelines for how to submit by email or mail.
NIL
$54 million college football coach now favored to be next Michigan head coach
Dillingham Out?
As the ripples of college football’s initial coaching carousel were starting to subside, here it goes again. Michigan was apparently closing in on Arizona State’s Kenny Dillingham as its next coach, but one of Lee Corso’s truisms came roaring back: not so fast, my friend. Dillingham is now rumored to be signing an extension at Arizona State, which means that the Michigan search will continue.
DeBoer A Possibility?
Other rumors with Michigan have centered around Alabama coach Kalen DeBoer. That’s convenient timing, as DeBoer himself is in jeopardy of a fourth loss in a second consecutive season at Alabama. It’s safe to say, as Paul Finebaum asserted recently, that Alabama’s CFP game with Oklahoma could deeply impact DeBoer’s future plans. If DeBoer did leave Alabama, the resulting coaching carousel fallout would likely be massive across the entire sport.
A New Favorite
But a new favorite is jumping thorough the Kalshi prediction market. Washington coach Jeff Fisch has leaped to a 37% chance to take the Michigan job as Dillingham fell from an overwhelming favorite to under 10% chances. Fisch is finishing the second year of a $54 million contract for seven years that he signed with the Huskies before the 2024 season.
Fisch’s Resume
A renowned offensive mind, Fisch graduated from the University of Florida and has climbed the offensive coaching ladder since. He did coach defense briefly with the NFL’s Houston Texans, but he’s otherwise worked on offensive with a bevy of college and pro teams. He’s been the offensive coordinator at Miami, with the Jacksonville Jaguars, and at UCLA.
Fisch rose to prominence in his first head coaching job at Arizona. His Wildcat teams climbed from 1 to 5 to 10 wins in his three seasons there. Since taking over Washington, Fisch is now 14-11 and has taken the Huskies to two bowl games.
Michigan’s Dilemma
Michigan seemed to be in good shape with Sherrone Moore after the departure of Jim Harbaugh to the NFL, but the events of the last week left the Wolverines suddenly without a coach and at a point in the coaching carousel where many of the biggest targets (Lane Kiffin, James Franklin) and even the top secondary targets (Jon Sumrall, Alex Golesh) have already been hired.
Given the uncertainty around the Michigan program, Fisch might make sense simply as one of the quicker hires possible. With Washington preparing for the LA Bowl this evening, Fisch recently reiterated his plan to coach the Huskies in 2026. That said, the prediction market is obviously not quite buying in on that plan.

-
Rec Sports3 weeks agoFirst Tee Winter Registration is open
-
Rec Sports2 weeks agoFargo girl, 13, dies after collapsing during school basketball game – Grand Forks Herald
-
Motorsports3 weeks agoCPG Brands Like Allegra Are Betting on F1 for the First Time
-
Motorsports3 weeks agoF1 Las Vegas: Verstappen win, Norris and Piastri DQ tighten 2025 title fight
-
Sports3 weeks agoTwo Pro Volleyball Leagues Serve Up Plans for Minnesota Teams
-
Sports3 weeks agoSycamores unveil 2026 track and field schedule
-
Sports3 weeks agoUtah State Announces 2025-26 Indoor Track & Field Schedule
-
Motorsports2 weeks agoJo Shimoda Undergoes Back Surgery
-
Motorsports2 weeks agoRedemption Means First Pro Stock World Championship for Dallas Glenn
-
Sports3 weeks agoTexas volleyball vs Kentucky game score: Live SEC tournament updates





