Connect with us

NIL

Power Players

The crossover between the music and the sports industry is no longer about a sports person walking outside to his or her favorite song, or a musician playing at halftime. More and more artists and athletes are strategically diversified into the entertainment spectrum — own teams, create merchandise, work collaboratively on sportswear, and even start […]

Published

on

Power Players

The crossover between the music and the sports industry is no longer about a sports person walking outside to his or her favorite song, or a musician playing at halftime. More and more artists and athletes are strategically diversified into the entertainment spectrum — own teams, create merchandise, work collaboratively on sportswear, and even start music ventures. This crossover is not a fashion. It’s a reflection of the creation of these worlds, which sound, style, and sport have now become so eminently interwoven. 

Music in particular has arisen as a potent connective tissue binding these listed endeavours, not just as a personal preoccupation amongst those listed here, but as a critical elephant in the room in terms of making their corporate personas tick. 

In this article, the biggest names in leading this movement are broken down, showing how they reverberate across arenas, lyrics, and streaming platforms.  Each personality and initiative discussed showcases a rising synergy where music doesn’t just meet athletic empire-building — it helps define it

Jay-Z – Brooklyn Nets Mogul

Shawn “Jay-Z” Carter made headlines in 2004 when he purchased a stake (approximately 1.5%) in the NBA’s New Jersey Nets for about $1 million. His participation was not an investment – it was all about branding the team’s image and culture. By facilitating the move of the team to Brooklyn and contributing to the design and marketing of the Barclays Center, Jay-Z combined urban music culture and professional basketball, creating a blueprint for artist participation in ownership of the sport. While he sold his stake in the year 2013 in order to meet the requirements of NBA agent regulations, his contribution to the Nets’ rebranding is spectacular.

Drake – Global Ambassador for the Toronto Raptors

In 2013, Drake became the official global ambassador for the Toronto Raptors — a strategic role that went far beyond courtside appearances. As a native of Toronto, he channeled his fame and musical influence into redefining the Raptors as more than a sports team — they became a cultural movement. His imprint includes the annual “Drake Night,” the introduction of alternate uniforms like the black-and-gold OVO edition, and collaborations that blurred the lines between basketball and hip-hop. The Raptors’ eventual 2019 NBA Championship win only validated the power of this cultural synergy.

Travis Scott – Houston Rockets Collaboration

Travis Scott, who started making music with warped genres and visualizing games, teamed up with the Houston Rockets in 2019 to drop a capsule merchandise collection. In his own right, a native of Houston, Scott brought his unique touch to the NBA franchise. His Cactus Jack brand collaborated with the Rockets on fashion jerseys and apparel that sold out in almost no time. The collaboration also featured red-and-black opposing jerseys, hoodies, and exclusive memorabilia that recognized the meeting point of pride for Texas, hip-hop revolution, and basketball cool.

LeBron James – Dominance Beyond the Court

LeBron James, an up there with the most marketable sports personalities in the world, a four-time NBA champion, is not about basketball accolades. He is a big player in the entertainment world with SpringHill Company – a media franchise that crosses over sports, television, and especially music. Most people would not suspect that LeBron’s associations with the music industry run deep: he’s executive-produced soundtracks and operated alongside some of the biggest producers in the business. 

Springhill, which has been valued at over $725 million recently, shows how athletes are no longer objects of culture – they create it. Whether on the field or in a music video, or as a playlist curator or a defender of music‘s documentary, LeBron offers a CEO’s strategic vision and an artist’s creative pulse – a blend that continues to rise as the transformative space between sports and music continues to evolve.

Artist-Designed Jerseys and Capsule Collections

The blending of music and sports fashion reached a new high with artist-designed team jerseys and capsule collections. From Big Sean’s Detroit Pistons-themed apparel to J. Cole’s Puma x Dreamer collections inspired by his basketball alter ego, these partnerships go beyond mere branding. They carry storytelling, city pride, and performance wear into one product. Travis Scott’s Rockets collection and Drake’s OVO Raptors gear are standout examples. Fans who want to show support for these crossover icons can use a Fanatics promo code to score gear that blends music and sports culture, taking their loyalty beyond streaming or game time.

Athletes Who Run Music Labels

Beyond their feats on the court or field, several athletes have launched music labels.  Damian Lillard, better known as Dame D.O.L.L.A., in the music world, has a record label, Front Page Music, and he has released many albums that have guest appearances by Lil Wayne and other hip-hop heavyweights. Victor Oladipo has also pursued music seriously, independently releasing R&B projects, though he does not operate a formal label. These ventures show that for many athletes, music is not just a hobby — it is a second profession, often backed by the same discipline and branding seen in their athletic lives.

Strategic Brand Deals: Blending Music and Sports

Brand partnerships have gone beyond endorsements to become integrative creative partnerships. Beats by Dre (co-championed by music legend Dr Dre) shrewdly associated itself with sports personalities such as Serena Williams, LeBron James, and Richard Sherman and crafted campaigns that spoke on the lines of empowerment, discipline, and rhythm. Adidas and Pharrell Williams developed a collection that reached sneakerheads and athletes. These brand deals function as cultural vehicles, where artists and athletes co-create merchandise, campaigns, and experiences that merge two global entertainment pillars.

Athlete-Curated Music for Game Day

Athlete-curated playlists are becoming standard across sports leagues. Whether it is Odell Beckham Jr. setting the pre-game vibe or Stephen Curry spotlighting indie artists on Spotify, the influence of athletes on music trends is undeniable. These curated experiences extend into stadiums, team training centres, and even eSports arenas, showing how personal musical taste from sports figures shapes broader cultural movements and introduces fans to new genres and voices.

The Streaming Revolution and Crossover Content

Streaming platforms like Netflix, HBO, and Hulu have accelerated crossover content. Jay-Z produced “Rapture,” a hip-hop docu series on Netflix, while LeBron James executive produced “Self Made” and “Top Class.” These works explore the grind, hustle, and drive values common in both music and sports. Many documentaries now incorporate original music, exclusive interviews, and sports insights, creating hybrid content that attracts audiences from both spheres.

Cultural Capital and City Branding

When musicians and athletes become synonymous with their cities, they do more than raise team morale — they redefine the local and global perception of entire regions. Drake’s affiliation with Toronto has transformed the city into a cultural capital. Similarly, Jay-Z elevated Brooklyn’s reputation globally. Travis Scott put Houston front and centre in sneaker and streetwear culture. These figures become ambassadors not only for their teams or labels but also for tourism, civic engagement, and youth empowerment, establishing a legacy that stretches far beyond arenas or concert halls.

Final Thoughts on Power and Influence

Artists and athletes leveraging their influence across sports and music is not a passing trend — it is the future of cross-industry leadership. These power players are not just entertainers or rivals, yet they are cultural architects who define the economic and creative course of the generation. Whether this is through Jay-Z’s revolution at the Brooklyn Nets, Drake’s branding trailblazer status with the Raptors, or LeBron’s billion-dollar media brand through SpringHill, the point is that music and sports can intersect to create profound, multi-pronged entrepreneurship. Where the bomb goes, the future of hybrid ventures that combine beats, business, and bold vision flows, and these icons aren’t just building brands – they’re scripting the future.

Image Credit: DALL-E

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

NIL

College football, basketball or other? How schools will share revenue

Kirby Smart on college football’s future Kirby Smart urges leaders to prioritize the game’s future over personal or conference agendas in playoff talks. How much capped revenue share money will each team within an athletic department receive? That’s left to schools to decide. Welcome to “Capology.” Conventional wisdom will lead many schools to distribute most […]

Published

on


play

  • How much capped revenue share money will each team within an athletic department receive? That’s left to schools to decide. Welcome to “Capology.”
  • Conventional wisdom will lead many schools to distribute most of their revenue share allotment to football and men’s basketball, but opportunities exist for deviations.
  • Schools’ autonomy opens the door for some outside-the-box spending ideation. Schools have the chance to identify and spend on the sports that matter most to their fans and school fabric.

They’re playing a new game at college athletic departments. We’ll call it “Capology,” and game play tasks athletic directors to be the banker.

A legal settlement approved June 6 authorizes schools to directly pay athletes from athletic department coffers in the form of revenue sharing, beginning July 1. That revenue sharing will be capped this year at about $20.5 million per school.

Athletes’ separate NIL deals brokered with outside entities won’t count against a school’s revenue share cap.

How much capped revenue share money will each team within an athletic department receive? That’s left to individual schools to decide.

Commissioners from the Power Four conferences plus the rebuilt Pac-12 confirmed their schools retain the authority to determine the percentage breakdown of how they’ll distribute their capped allotment with their teams.

Decisions, decisions, for athletic directors tasked to dole out the dough.

“Things get very political really quick of who gets what resources,” Mississippi State athletic director Zac Selmon said, “but I think you’ve got to continue to invest in programs that generate the revenue. That’s No. 1.

“And No. 2, would be, what’s the fabric of your school? For us, at Mississippi State, baseball is a huge deal.”

Selmon’s assessment holds true to the way many athletic directors view this: The top revenue-generating sports of football and men’s basketball will get the lion’s share of revenue share dollars – about 90% combined across the two sports – with a smaller fraction going to women’s basketball, and other bedrock sports that help form the school’s identity will receive the leftover dollars.

MAJOR BOOST: The teams that benefit from playoff expansion

BIG FALL: SEC propaganda campaign shows it’s no longer top playoff dog

Within the SEC, at least, it’s widely believed many schools will use a baseline distribution model that uses the settlement’s backpay formula as a guide. Using this model, about 75% of a school’s revenue sharing cap will go to the football program, with about 15% going to men’s basketball, 5% to women’s basketball, and 5% for other sports.

Those 75-15-5-5 percentages, though, are not mandated, either within the SEC or beyond.

The breakdown could vary, as an institution sees fit.

“Conference to conference, school to school, sport revenue share allocations will vary based on several factors,” Oklahoma athletic director Joe Castiglione said.

Schools’ autonomy opens the door for some outside-the-box thinkers to emerge within “Capology.” This, too, is an opportunity for schools to identify and spend on the sports that matter most to their fans, and where they think they can win big.

“We’re giving our institutions discretion,” Big Ten commissioner Tony Petitti said, a sentiment echoed by the other power conference commissioners, “and they want that discretion.”

Conventional wisdom versus outside-the-box spending

Take Wisconsin, as an example.

The Badgers’ women’s basketball team last made the NCAA Tournament 15 years ago. Its robust volleyball program nearly doubles the women’s basketball team’s average attendance. Why shouldn’t Wisconsin zig where others zag and apply a higher percentage of its revenue sharing dollars toward volleyball, and less toward women’s basketball?

I’m thinking that rationale should apply, too, to Nebraska and Penn State, where powerhouse volleyball programs outperform and outdraw women’s basketball.

These Big Ten schools I’ve referenced have not disclosed their distribution percentage plan. I’m just spit-balling some “Capology” spending ideas that could allow schools to further excel in sports where they typically thrive.

Here’s another test subject: Florida women’s basketball last made a Sweet 16 in 1998, and its attendance limps behind SEC peers. The Gators’ softball program is a Women’s College World Series regular. Might Florida be better off spending less than SEC peers on women’s hoops and more on softball, in an attempt to gain separation in a diamond sport that enjoys relevance within the SEC?

In contrast, South Carolina and LSU shouldn’t put women’s basketball on the back burner. There, the women’s basketball teams outperform and outdraw their men’s counterparts. So, should the men’s programs really receive so much more in revenue sharing than the women?

“I think we need to be a little more generous than 5%,” South Carolina coach Dawn Staley told The State newspaper earlier this year, referencing the 5% baseline within the SEC for women’s basketball. “That’s my feel on it.”

Who could blame Staley for believing her team shouldn’t be shortchanged? It’s up to her institution, though, to decide how to divvy up the money. A school could even try to outspend South Carolina women’s basketball to try to accelerate past the Gamecocks.

Many schools will follow conventional wisdom on how dollars should be spent, but the opportunity exists to break from the mold.

Texas Tech revealed it plans to share 17 to 18% with its men’s basketball team, which reached the Elite Eight last season, and 2% to its women’s basketball team, which last reached the NCAA Tournament in 2013.

Priorities, right?

Football will receive most revenue share, but how much?

Consider a school that usually struggles in football. Should it allocate a smaller revenue share percentage to football than its peers and apply more money toward other sports? Perhaps, that’s worth mulling at schools where basketball or Olympic sports shine. Here’s an alternate idea: If you’re lagging in football, spend an even higher percentage of your allotment on football than the baseline, to try to close the talent gap.

Indiana showed how quickly a football team can transform from irrelevant to playoff qualifier in an era in which players may transfer without penalty.

Is it worth the risk to spend big, though, to play catchup, knowing that strategy would reduce the revenue share money available for other sports? That’s a question athletic directors must ponder.

Schools aren’t required to publicly disclose their distribution percentage plan, either, meaning one school won’t necessarily know exactly how its distribution model compares to another school.

Football revenues provide the financial lifeblood of college sports, but nothing says a basketball blueblood couldn’t spend less of its revenue share allotment on football, as compared to the industry standard, and outpace its peers on basketball spending.  

“There will be some institutions that might give 60% to football and 20% to men’s basketball, or any variation one could think of,” Castiglione said, speaking in general terms and not in reference to a particular school. “That’s an institutional choice.”

Just another decision when playing “Capology.”

Blake Toppmeyer is the USA TODAY Network’s national college football columnist. Email him at BToppmeyer@gannett.com and follow him on X @btoppmeyer.





Link

Continue Reading

NIL

Ella Toone launches creative agency to help women's footballers

Ella Toone has launched her own creative agency. Credit: Amicizia StudiosEngland and Manchester United star Ella Toone has launched Amicizia Studios, a creative agency aimed to help women’s footballers enhance their brand. Partnering with her long-term agent, James Marshall, Toone hopes to help female athletes maximise their earning potential. This is by bridging the sponsorship […]

Published

on

Ella Toone launches creative agency to help women's footballers

Ella Toone has launched her own creative agency

Ella Toone has launched her own creative agency. Credit: Amicizia StudiosEngland and Manchester United star Ella Toone has launched Amicizia Studios, a creative agency aimed to help women’s footballers enhance their brand.

Partnering with her long-term agent, James Marshall, Toone hopes to help female athletes maximise their earning potential.

This is by bridging the sponsorship gap in women’s football, where over 50% of Women’s Super League (WSL) players lack brand deals.

In a vision statement from Amicizia, as reported by Forbes, the company stated: “We’re not just here to get players a few deals; we’re here to build them into household names, showcasing their personalities, securing the recognition they deserve, and ensuring they receive proper fees.”

Amicizia Studios will offer services including content development (such as YouTube, podcasts, and documentaries), creative consultancy, and PR to connect athletes with brands.

Toone is Manchester United’s leading appearance maker and goalscorer with 61 goals in 188 appearances. She will also be part of the England squad aiming to defend their European Championship next month.

Why is Ella Toone launching a creative agency?

Ella Toone has launched Amicizia Studios to address the lack of brand sponsorships for WSL players, with half of them currently without deals.

Explaining her decision, she told Marketing Week: “There’s a really big gap in the market. Women’s football is growing, and more brands can be involved.”

As per Forbes, her manager James Marshall added: “Ella’s personality goes beyond football; she’s a natural storyteller.

“Through Amicizia, we want to give brands, athletes, and organisations the tools and expertise to create outstanding campaigns and content in the women’s game.

“The women’s football space is evolving fast, and brands are more engaged than ever. We’re excited to help tell these stories and drive impactful collaborations.”

Toone aims to help female athletes build their brands through partnerships in sports, fashion, and lifestyle sectors.

The Lionesses star has been building her own brand away from the football pitch. In 2023, she trademarked her own name and launched the ET7 brand. She also runs her own academy for young girls, led by FA-accredited coaches.

Toone is also one-half of the popular ‘Tooney and Russo Show’ podcast alongside England teammate Alessia Russo.

Toone included in England’s Euro 2025 squad

Ella Toone was named in Sarina Wiegman’s 23-player England squad for this summer’s Euros.

The Manchester United star scored the opening goal in England’s 2-1 victory over Germany in the Euro 2022 final three years ago.

She has become a vital part of the England squad, with 19 goals in 58 international appearances.

Toone missed two months of action for Manchester United this past season, after suffering a torn calf. She returned with a hat-trick for Manchester United against local rivals Man City, back in January.

Continue Reading

NIL

BYU’s AJ Dybantsa Becomes College Basketball’s Top NIL Earner

BYU’s AJ Dybantsa Becomes College Basketball’s Top NIL Earner originally appeared on Athlon Sports. BYU’s AJ Dybantsa is already turning heads before the 2025-26 college basketball season. As the No. 1 player in the country, he’s already projected as the top pick in the 2026 NBA Draft. But his moves off the court are just […]

Published

on


BYU’s AJ Dybantsa Becomes College Basketball’s Top NIL Earner originally appeared on Athlon Sports.

BYU’s AJ Dybantsa is already turning heads before the 2025-26 college basketball season. As the No. 1 player in the country, he’s already projected as the top pick in the 2026 NBA Draft. But his moves off the court are just as good.

Advertisement

Dybantsa saw a significant jump in his On3 NIL valuation recently. He moved up to $4.1 million and cracked the top five for the first time in his career. As it stands now, the 6-foot-9 power forward is only $200K away from Miami QB Carson Beck at No. 2 ($4.3M) and $100K from Ohio State receiver Jeremiah Smith ($4.2M). Arch Manning is firmly at the top with a valuation of $6.8 million.

However, Dybantsa is the top college basketball earner after landing deals with Nike and Red Bull. Dybantsa is on a contract with BYU to receive over $7 million this season, according to Adam Zagoria of the New York Times. An NIL offering he denied at the McDonald’s All-American Game.

Related: BYU Basketball Shows Interest in Rising International Star

BYU has picked up the pace on the NIL trail very quickly. One of the biggest contributors is Utah Jazz and Utah Mammoth owner Ryan Smith. But underneath it all is Kevin Young. The Cougars coach came to Provo after being an NBA assistant for the Phoenix Suns and Philadelphia 76ers. His detailed guidance and pro-ready approach is why Dybantsa decided to sign with BYU.

Advertisement

Related: BYU Cracks ESPN’s Future Power Rankings Top 25

As the season quickly approaches, Dybantsa will be part of the most hype-filled year in BYU Basketball history. The Cougars projected starting lineup has many national outlets putting them as a national title contender and on a level playing field in the Big 12 with Houston, who is coming off a heartbreaking loss in the National Championship to Florida.

The upcoming season will be fun to watch as Dybantsa has already said he’s one-and-done before turning pro.

This story was originally reported by Athlon Sports on Jun 12, 2025, where it first appeared.



Link

Continue Reading

NIL

The Dirty Nil Drop Urgent Single 'Rock N' Roll Band'

The Dirty Nil have shared the latest taste of upcoming album ‘The Lash’ in the form of urgent single ‘Rock N’ Roll Band’. With ‘The Lash’ set for release on July 25 via Dine Alone Records, it follows recent single ‘Gallop Of The Hounds’. A razor-sharp gut-punch of a track, on ‘Rock N’ Roll Band’ […]

Published

on

The Dirty Nil Drop Urgent Single 'Rock N' Roll Band'

The Dirty Nil have shared the latest taste of upcoming album ‘The Lash’ in the form of urgent single ‘Rock N’ Roll Band’.

With ‘The Lash’ set for release on July 25 via Dine Alone Records, it follows recent single ‘Gallop Of The Hounds’.

A razor-sharp gut-punch of a track, on ‘Rock N’ Roll Band’ frontman Luke Bentham has shared:

“This is the first song I wrote for The Lash… I don’t remember what particular aspect of the industry had got my goat that day but I’d worked myself up to a fine lather. I blasted out the whole song in 30 minutes and instantly felt better. Though the song is pretty negative, it makes me happy. This one is for all the road dogs, we salute you.”

Take a listen below:

‘The Lash’ will arrive ahead of the band’s return to the UK when they will play London on October 25 and Leeds on the 26th as part of the Common Thread tour with Hot Water Music, Spanish Love Songs, Comeback Kid and Joyce Manor.

Check out the artwork and tracklisting for the album below:

1) Gallop of the Hounds

2) Fail in Time

3) That Don’t Mean It Won’t Sting

4) Rock ‘n’ Roll Band

5) This Is Me Warning Ya

6) Do You Want Me?

7) Spider Dream

8) They Won’t Beat Us

9) Hero Narrative

10) I Was A Henchman

Continue Reading

NIL

Breaking down house settlement and how it could impact UF athletics

Swampcast breaks down Florida softball at WCWS, Florida basketball The Sun’s Kevin Brockway and Noah Ram and Kevin Brockway are joined by Nathan Geise of the Lubbock Avalanche-Journal to break down Florida softball, Texas Tech in WCWS. The University of Florida can now pay athletes directly due to the House vs. NCAA settlement. Florida football […]

Published

on


play

  • The University of Florida can now pay athletes directly due to the House vs. NCAA settlement.
  • Florida football and men’s basketball are likely to receive the majority of the $20.5 million allocated for athlete compensation.
  • NIL deals exceeding $600 will be reviewed for legitimacy by a clearinghouse monitored by Deloitte.

The landmark House vs. NCAA Settlement, approved on June 6 by U.S. District Court Judge Claudia Wilken, opens the door for athletes to be paid directly by the University of Florida Athletic Association.

According to the settlement, starting on July 1, UF can spend up to $20.5 million on its athletes, which includes funding scholarships and paying them directly. How that money is allocated by sport remains to be seen. Florida athletic director Scott Stricklin was unavailable for comment this week and may or may not choose to disclose how the money will be distributed.

UF has the potential to provide financial support to all 21 of its men’s and women’s sports, either by paying athletes directly or funding scholarships. Priority, though, will likely be given to two major revenue producing sports, Florida football and Florida basketball, which is coming off a national championship season. A model prescribed in the preliminary House settlement calls for about 75% to be paid to football players, 15% to men’s basketball, 5% to women’s basketball and 5% to other sports.

That’s based on the revenue generated by each sport. Per UF’s latest NCAA financial report, football generated $100,796,971 in revenue in fiscal year 2024, followed by men’s basketball at 14,344,967 and baseball at 4,328,038. Football accounted for 50.4% of UF’s total athletic department revenues ($200,094,587), while basketball accounted for 7.2%.

Stricklin released a statement on June 7, the day after the settlement was reached.

“The University of Florida Athletic Association welcomes the recent court ruling allowing schools to directly share revenue with student-athletes,” Stricklin said in the statement. “This decision marks an important step forward for college athletics, and we remain committed to supporting Gator athletes on and off the field. Beyond financial opportunities, the UAA will continue to provide world-class training, academic support, and career development to help our Gators succeed during their time at UF and beyond.”

Can Florida athletes still receive outside endorsements?

Florida athletes can still receive outsides Name, Image and Likeness endorsements based on the value of their brands. But those deals will undergo more scrutiny.

All NIL deals of more than $600 will pass through a clearinghouse which will determine the legitimacy of the deal based on the athlete’s market value. For example, Cooper Flagg’s multi-million-dollar deal with New Balance would pass the smell test based on coming into college basketball as the nation’s top college recruit playing for one of the sport’s biggest college basketball brands, Duke. But under the new system, the days of promising a five-star offensive lineman a six-figure deal NIL deal out of high school to keep from signing with a rival school are likely over.

The accounting firm Deloitte will monitor the NIL clearinghouse. Athletes will submit NIL deals of more than $600 to an online platform called NIL Go, where they will be reviewed.

The NCAA will no longer be involved in rules enforcement, replaced by the College Sports Commission, which was formed by and has received the full backing from major conference commissioners. The College Sports Commission will hand out punishments to schools who break rules regarding NIL and revenue sharing.

“Our schools want rules,” Big 12 commissioner Brett Yormark told a group of national media outlets this week. “We’re providing rules, and we will be governed by those rules. And if you break those rules, the ramifications will be punitive.”.

Mit Witner, a Kansas City-based attorney specializing in sports law and NL legislations, expects more legal challenges to arise due to the NCAA’s inability to secure an antitrust exemption.

“If the College Sports Commission says if an athlete wants to remain eligible, they can’t do this deal to play college sports, it’s acting as a limit on the college athlete’s compensation,” Witner said. “There’s no antitrust exemption now for that, so I definitely think there will be litigation on that issue.”

How Florida football has prepared for paying its players

Florida football coach Billy Napier said he expects revenue share to provide more stability in terms of compensating football players entering the 2025 season.

In Napier’s first three seasons, he relied on funds and NIL deals generated from Florida Victorius and the now defunct Gator Collective. A botched NIL deal by the Gator Collective for five-star quarterback recruit Jaden Rashada resulted in Napier, booster Hugh Hathcock and former UF staff member Marcus Castro-Walker getting sued by Rashada for fraud and vicarious liability.

Last February, Napier made two front office hires to the football program, adding Benjamin Elsner as director of football strategy and Nick Polk as Associate Athletic Director/Football General Manager,

Polk spent 17 seasons as Director of Football Operations for the Atlanta Falcons (2004-21), where he was responsible for salary cap management, including draft negotiations, contract proposals, player contracts, coaches’ contracts, trades and trade value analysis. Those skills will be put to test in the new college sports revenue share era.

“His experience with the cap management, the strategy around contracts, that’s part of the game, right?” Napier said last March. “He’s hit the ground running.”

Kevin Brockway is The Gainesville Sun’s Florida beat writer. Contact him at kbrockway@gannett.com. Follow him on X @KevinBrockwayG1. Read his coverage of the Gators’ national championship basketball season in “CHOMP-IONS!” — a hardcover coffee-table collector’s book from The Sun. Details at Florida.ChampsBook.com



Link

Continue Reading

NIL

Maryland NIL Collective Pushes Back on Ja'Kobi Gillespie Lawsuit

Maryland NIL Collective Pushes Back on Ja’Kobi Gillespie Lawsuit originally appeared on Athlon Sports. What started as a breakout season for Ja’Kobi Gillespie at Maryland has unraveled into a legal battle that could shake the foundation of NIL deals nationwide. Advertisement Advertisement Advertisement Gillespie, who averaged 14.7 points and earned second-team All-Big Ten honors before […]

Published

on

Maryland NIL Collective Pushes Back on Ja'Kobi Gillespie Lawsuit

Maryland NIL Collective Pushes Back on Ja’Kobi Gillespie Lawsuit originally appeared on Athlon Sports.

What started as a breakout season for Ja’Kobi Gillespie at Maryland has unraveled into a legal battle that could shake the foundation of NIL deals nationwide.

Advertisement

Gillespie, who averaged 14.7 points and earned second-team All-Big Ten honors before transferring to Tennessee, is suing Blueprint Sports, the operator of Maryland’s NIL collective, over what his father claims is $100,000 in unpaid compensation. But Maryland’s NIL leadership is calling the claims baseless, and they’re not backing down.

“It was always explained to the Gillespie family that if they transferred, the payments would stop, as it’s a year-round commitment,” said Turtle NIL founder Harry Geller, who helped negotiate the original deal before Blueprint took over.

The legal spat hinges on a key detail: whether Gillespie’s contract explicitly stated payments would continue even after entering the transfer portal. According to Geller, every contract he drafted included a transfer clause that nullified payments. However, Gillespie’s final contract, rewritten by Blueprint, apparently omitted that clause.

Still, Geller insists that “strong language in the BPS contract referring to the consequences of transferring” protects the collective from liability.

Advertisement

The stakes are high, not just for Gillespie, but for every player banking on NIL guarantees. If Gillespie’s side prevails, it could set a precedent that forces collectives nationwide to pay more attention to contract continuity and transparency.

Maryland Terrapins forward Julian Reese, center Derik Queen, and guard Ja'Kobi GillespieSteven Bisig-Imagn Images

Maryland Terrapins forward Julian Reese, center Derik Queen, and guard Ja’Kobi GillespieSteven Bisig-Imagn Images

His father, Byron Gillespie, told The Baltimore Sun that the lack of payment reflects broader dysfunction in Maryland’s NIL program.

“When Willard left, they pretty much quit paying all the players… There were players that did get their money and players that didn’t and are still fighting for it.”

Gillespie has since landed a reportedly $2 million NIL package at Tennessee, nearly five times what he earned at Maryland. That success is exactly why Geller questions the lawsuit’s motive.

Advertisement

“Why he is even pursuing this is beyond me,” Geller said. “He made the most of the opportunity and turned it into a major payday.”

Maryland’s program is still reeling from the departure of head coach Kevin Willard, who clashed with administration over NIL support. The Gillespie dispute only adds fuel to the perception that Maryland is lagging in the name, image, and likeness arms race.

For future recruits and current student-athletes, the outcome of this lawsuit could influence how NIL contracts are structured, enforced, and interpreted, especially in cases where athletes transfer.

Whether it’s a cautionary tale or a catalyst for change, Gillespie’s legal battle underscores one truth: NIL money may be flowing, but the rules are far from settled. Collectives, athletes, and universities alike must brace for a more regulated, and litigated future.

Advertisement

Related: Paul Finebaum Warns House NIL Ruling Is a “Ticking Time Bomb”

Related: The NCAA is Dead, Long Live the Game

This story was originally reported by Athlon Sports on Jun 11, 2025, where it first appeared.

Continue Reading

Most Viewed Posts

Trending