Amid the NIL gold rush, college sports programs seeking an edge with top talent are reuniting with star alumni—and sending them out on the recruiting trail.

Last month, as the NBA regular season was barreling toward its conclusion, Atlanta Hawks guard Terance Mann had more on his mind than his team’s push for a playoff spot. The basketball program at his alma mater, Florida State University, had won only 17 games and failed to qualify for the NCAA tournament, and Mann wanted to help. So he chipped in with recruiting, connecting the team with guard Martin Somerville—a transfer prospect from the University of Massachusetts whom he knew from off-season workouts—and eventually steering Somerville to Tallahassee.

“Martin Somerville is going to play a lot for us next year,” says Luke Loucks, who was hired as Florida State’s coach in March. “Without Terance, we had no shot at getting him, and we beat out some really big schools that were willing to pay way more in NIL to get him.”

In the four years since the NCAA begrudgingly began to allow its athletes to profit off their name, image and likeness, big-time college sports have quickly become a bidding war for top players. In addition to the branded social media posts and local television commercials that rulesmakers might have envisioned when they opened the doors to commercial deals for athletes on campus, boosters have pooled their resources and formed collectives to funnel money to recruits—nominally for marketing services but in practice often a thinly veiled form of pay-for-play.

Three antitrust lawsuits—House v. NCAA, Hubbard v. NCAA and Carter v. NCAA—are currently awaiting court approval for a settlement that would inject even more money into the system, enabling universities to directly pay athletes a share of their media, ticket and sponsorship revenue and effectively ending college sports’ commitment to amateurism. For example, according to the Houston Chronicle, the University of Texas plans to spend $35 million to $40 million on its football roster next season between its NIL payouts and the revenue-sharing payments, which are expected to be capped initially at $20.5 million. Already, however, programs’ price tags are eye-popping. Last July, Ohio State’s athletic director told the Columbus Dispatch that the school’s football players had received roughly $20 million in NIL deals over the previous year through a variety of third parties.

Naturally, not every university has the wherewithal to keep up, and even the ones that do are fighting for a competitive edge. A handful of institutions believe they have found an answer that goes beyond dollars and cents—all-star alumni like Mann, a six-year NBA veteran who played for the Seminoles from 2015 to 2019.

In April, Mann officially rejoined Florida State as assistant general manager of the men’s basketball program. He will not be an FSU employee or be paid for his role, but he will be expected to play a part in player development as well as recruiting.

“It’s a great idea,” says Mann, 28. “As long as the landscape stays this way, colleges should find somebody that will help them recruit, raise money and be an ambassador all in one, and I think eventually we’re going to see most of them doing it.”

A month before Mann started his new side hustle, Golden State Warriors superstar Stephen Curry paved the way by becoming the assistant general manager for the men’s and women’s basketball teams at his alma mater, Davidson College—billed as the first time an active athlete from a major North American sports league had accepted an administrative role with an NCAA program. Three weeks later, Trae Young, Mann’s teammate on the NBA’s Hawks, went back to the University of Oklahoma in a similar role, and Las Vegas Raiders defensive end Maxx Crosby followed in April by taking a position with Eastern Michigan University’s football program. (And this doesn’t even include former Indianapolis Colts quarterback Andrew Luck, who became Stanford football’s general manager in November, five years after retiring from the NFL.)

It’s hardly the first time schools have leaned on famous alumni for a boost. Former players of Duke University’s basketball program routinely show up to games at Cameron Indoor Stadium, Loucks notes, and the Blue Devils’ “Brotherhood” has long been a selling point to prospective recruits. But the new trend is a more formal relationship, and it comes with one additional advantage: Official members of a program can contact recruits, whereas alumni and boosters are generally prohibited under NCAA bylaws from calling them directly and are limited to certain types of interaction on campus.

The reinforcements give colleges a new tool to build—and preserve—their rosters in an era complicated by not only NIL money but also laxer transfer rules, which allow athletes to seek better compensation from rival schools without having to sit out seasons if they switch programs. The offers can be enticing: According to NIL deal marketplace Opendorse, the top 100 earners in men’s college sports bring in more than $1 million on average, and the corresponding figure for women’s athletes is around $250,000. There is even big money to be found in smaller sports, such as softball, which saw ace pitcher NiJaree Canady jump from Stanford to Texas Tech last year with a guarantee of more than $1 million for a single year’s commitment.

Across NCAA Division I men’s basketball, more than 2,500 players entered the transfer portal in 2025, according to college basketball recruitment website VerbalCommits.com, nearly triple the 957 that did so in 2019, a year after the new transfer system was introduced.

“Because players can leave and go to other schools, how do you keep them happy?” says Mark Conrad, director of the sports business program at Fordham University. “You can’t sign them to long-term contracts, yet you want them to stay.”

One strategy might be to keep around a professional athlete like Young, a four-time NBA All-Star who was the league’s fifth overall draft pick in 2018. He could help Oklahoma identify talent, mentor young players and balance the egos that come with uneven compensation in a locker room, Conrad contends. Young could also assist with creating a culture of retaining athletes—even if that might be a bit ironic for a player who spent a single season in college, in 2017-18, before turning pro.

Young says college sports’ emerging obstacles are exactly what drew him back to his alma mater. After Oklahoma lost its first-round NCAA tournament matchup against the University of Connecticut this year, he was moved when he heard Sooners coach Porter Moser say that winning in April and May—a key time for transfers and recruiting in college basketball—translates to winning in March Madness.

“It hit home,” Young says. “I definitely am always rooting for my school.”

Since leaving college life in Norman, Young has maintained close ties with the university and says he spent years talking with athletic director Joe Castiglione about how he could get involved. The idea to step in as an assistant general manager materialized shortly before the school made the announcement in March. (Mann says that when Young struck his deal, a “light bulb went off” for him, too, and he got a call from Loucks the same day.)

Young, whose Hawks ended up losing their two play-in games and missing the NBA playoffs, has already begun talking to athletic department donors as well as recruits and transfers, although he declined to name anyone. His most impactful move thus far, however, was a $1 million commitment he made to Oklahoma as part of his deal to join the program. Castiglione did not offer specifics on how the money would be deployed but says it will be used in “areas that help the basketball program,” which could include NIL funding. (Oklahoma also declined to reveal the amount of NIL money its athletes receive.)

Young hasn’t ruled out making additional donations in the future—and he could certainly afford to. In addition to his $43 million NBA playing salary this season, Forbes estimates he earned $3 million off the court over the past 12 months from endorsements, appearances, licensing income and other business endeavors. Mann, meanwhile, collected more than $12 million in total earnings (before taxes and agent fees) and made an undisclosed donation to Florida State. And Curry—who pulled in an estimated $156 million over the past 12 months, ranking second among the world’s highest-paid athletes—is contributing to a new eight-figure fund for Davidson athletes.

It remains to be seen exactly how much time these celebrities will dedicate to their schools since none are planning to give up their day jobs anytime soon. Young, who just finished building a house in Norman, says there will be weeks or months when he’s more involved and others when he’s less engaged, depending on the ebbs and flows of the NBA season. The same goes for Mann, who plans to make a few trips to Tallahassee this summer and has already joined the Florida State coaches’ group chat.

“I don’t think it’s just an ambassador thing where we show up, smile, shake hands and post on our social medias about it,” Mann says. “I think me and [Young] are very much involved in our colleges, and we are hands-on. We both don’t want to see anything on our name not be good. We’re both competitors.”

Young is also thinking in competitive terms.

“I need myself a ring,” he says. “I only had one chance at it, and I didn’t do really well in my tournament experience—we lost in the first round.

“You need four, five, six, seven guys that can win you a championship, so I’m going to go get them and bring me and this university our first championship.”

More From Forbes

ForbesCavinder Twins, Stars On TikTok And Basketball Court, Are Nearing $2 Million In NIL Deals, With More AheadBy Brett KnightForbesCollege Sports’ ‘King Of NIL’ Is Racking Up Endorsement Deals At A Small HBCUBy Brett KnightForbes30 Under 30 Sports 2025: These Athletes And Executives Are Breaking BarriersBy Justin BirnbaumForbesThe World’s 10 Highest-Paid Athletes 2025By Brett Knight

The landscape of college football is shifting, and whispers of a massive overhaul are growing louder every day. According to a recent episode of the “Locked On College Football” podcast hosted by Spencer McLaughlin, the Power Four conferences—the SEC, Big Ten, ACC, and Big 12—are quietly crafting a radical proposal to reshape the NCAA’s governance structure.

Power Conferences Pushing Schools For A “No-Sue” Pact In The New NCAA

This new entity, dubbed the College Sports Commission, would take control from the NCAA and regulate Name, Image, and Likeness (NIL) compensation, transfer portal activity, and rule violations. However, according to McLaughlin, there’s a twist to this new arrangement, which is not very sunshine and roses.

Schools that join this system would surrender their right to sue, a move that could lock them into a tightly controlled framework or cause them to face expulsion from their conference.

The NCAA’s authority has eroded in recent years, battered by court losses and an inability to enforce NIL and transfer rules effectively. As McLaughlin noted, citing Yahoo Sports’ Ross Dellenger, the NCAA “just shows up and hands out punishments that nobody cares about.”

Legal challenges, like Tennessee’s successful lawsuit against the NCAA over NIL violations, have exposed the organization’s vulnerable side. This was all the reason Power Four conferences needed to step into and fill this void, by any means necessary.

They are proposing a new entity led by a CEO, similar to a professional sports commissioner, to oversee athlete compensation and compliance. This commission would enforce a $20.5 million per-school revenue-sharing cap, starting in 2025–26, and police third-party NIL deals through a clearinghouse operated by Deloitte to ensure “fair market value.”

The catch, as McLaughlin pointed, is very “totalitarian” in nature, according to many. In this new arrangement, schools opting into this system would have to give up their ability to sue the commission over its rules.

This clause aims to shield the new entity from the legal battles that have plagued the NCAA. “It’s a crazy punishment,” McLaughlin said. “If you don’t want to be told what to do… you’re out of the conference.”

Central to this proposal is a plan to have a Big Four accounting firm, likely Deloitte, assess NIL deals for fair market value. Any deal worth $600 or more tied to a school-affiliated entity would face scrutiny to prevent “pay-for-play” arrangements.

McLaughlin warned that this could slash player earnings, as Dellenger’s reporting suggests 80% of current NIL deals might be deemed overvalued.

The House Settlement

The proposed commission dovetails with the House v. NCAA settlement, which awaits final approval on July 7, 2025. The settlement, preliminarily approved in October 2024, will distribute $2.78 billion in backpay to athletes from 2016 onward and allow schools to share up to $20.5 million annually with players.

However, it imposes roster limits (e.g., 105 for football) and requires NIL deal disclosures, raising Title IX and fairness concerns. McLaughlin points at the settlement’s uncertainty, noting that state laws, like Tennessee’s, could undermine enforcement by permitting direct payments if the settlement fails.

KEEP READING: 2025 Way-Too-Early College Football Top 25 Power Rankings

In the end, whether this new NCAA takes hold or collapses under legal scrutiny, one thing is certain: college football’s future hangs in the balance, and the next few months will be a mad scramble for power, money, and control.

College Sports Network has you covered with the latest news, analysis, insights, and trending stories in college football, men’s college basketball, women’s college basketball, and college baseball!