Connect with us
https://yoursportsnation.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/call-to-1.png

NIL

Report: College basketball regular season expanding to 32-game limit

According to CBS Sports’ Matt Norlander, the number of college basketball games played in a season is set to increase. Norlander reports beginning with the 2026-2027 season, teams can play on 32 occasions. They will not be required to but the move allows programs to schedule more nonconference matchups any given year. “College basketball’s regular […]

Published

on


According to CBS Sports’ Matt Norlander, the number of college basketball games played in a season is set to increase. Norlander reports beginning with the 2026-2027 season, teams can play on 32 occasions. They will not be required to but the move allows programs to schedule more nonconference matchups any given year.

“College basketball’s regular season is set to expand,” Norlander said. “Barring an unexpected and extremely unlikely motion to vote against, the NCAA Division I Council will approve on Wednesday an increase from 31 to 32 games, beginning with the 2026-27 season, sources told CBS Sports.”

***UPDATE*** – Later Wednesday evening, Norlander confirmed the deal was done. The change will apply to both men’s and women’s college basketball.

Norlander added that multiple team events (MTEs) are in the middle of the decision to expand. Events such as the Player’s Festival in Las Vegas can produce as many as four games in the later portion of November. Adding a game to the overall total gives schools more flexibility.

Finding some better high-profile nonconference matchups appears to be another goal, especially in the later portion of the regular season. Norlander said, “The additional game should also enable more teams to bring back nonconference opportunities in January or February.” Duke facing Illinois last year is an example, as is the Blue Devils recently agreeing to a matchup against Michigan in 2026.

As of now, no mention of expanding the calendar as to when the season begins. Early November appears to still be the target date. For example, this season’s opening night will take place on Nov. 4, spanning all the way to the first Monday in April for the national championship game.

Decision on NCAA Tournament expansion expected soon

Will the NCAA Tournament expand beyond the current format to include more teams? We should know soon enough.

According to a report from ESPN’s Pete Thamel, the decision or whether to expand the NCAA men’s and women’s basketball tournaments for 2026 “is expected to come in the next few weeks.” Thamel notes that the expansion would be to no more than 76 schools, which would be a maximum increase of eight new teams from the current format.

Thamel also notes that the NCAA remains engaged in talks with its media partners over any potential changes. That’s no surprise, as the primary driver in any decision is likely to be maximizing viewership and revenue.

The last major expansion to the NCAA Tournament field came in 2011. At that point, the field expanded from 64 teams to 68 teams. That brought about the advent of the play-in game.

On3’s Thomas Goldkamp contributed to this report



Link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

NIL

CBS Sports releases Preseason AP Poll Top 25 prediction ahead of 2025 college football season

CBS Sports released its preseason AP Poll Top 25 predictions ahead of the 2025 college football season. We are this close to real football! This won’t be an exact ranking of all 25 teams in the poll, barring something unforeseen. If that’s the case, anyone who predicts this exactly right should play the lottery! Without […]

Published

on


CBS Sports released its preseason AP Poll Top 25 predictions ahead of the 2025 college football season. We are this close to real football!

This won’t be an exact ranking of all 25 teams in the poll, barring something unforeseen. If that’s the case, anyone who predicts this exactly right should play the lottery!

Without further ado, let’s dive into the predicted AP Poll Top 25 from CBS Sports. We start at the top!

CBS Sports has Texas as the No. 1 team in their AP Poll predictions. It’s easy to see why. Steve Sarkisian at coach, Arch Manning at QB, a collection of characters that have developed, and more.

The natural progression of Texas is to finally win it all again, for the first time in 20 years anyway. After two CFP semifinal appearances, it’s a national title or bust for this squad.

Jeremiah Smith-Ohio State-Ohio State football-Buckeyes
Ohio State WR Jeremiah Smith (© Adam Cairns/Columbus Dispatch / USA TODAY NETWORK via Imagn Images)

The Buckeyes will be high up in the AP Poll to start the season considering they just won the whole darn thing last year. Julian Sayin is likely to step in at quarterback as he looks to pilot a loaded offense.

The defense is led by DB Caleb Downs while WR Jeremiah Smith is a Heisman contender, helping out the aforementioned Sayin. Ryan Day just has to get the Michigan monkey off his back this year, but this is one of the best teams in the country.

Speaking of teams in the AP Poll that are in the national title race, Penn State is running it back from 2024. Drew Allar is back at QB, along with Nick Singleton and Kaytron Allen at running back.

James Franklin is under pressure to certainly deliver this season. He entrusted former Ohio State DC Jim Knowles with that unit, which includes star DL Dani Dennis-Sutton.

Kirby Smart and Georgia are quietly going about their business this season. But, the AP Poll will likely have them in the top five by Monday.

Gunner Stockton steps in at QB with a full offseason under his belt. Going into the fall, Georgia should be in the SEC race to repeat as conference champs and set up for a CFP run.

Cade Klubnik is coming back to Clemson in 2025.
Mark J. Rebilas-Imagn Images

Clemson returned to form under Dabo Swinney last season, winning the ACC and making the College Football Playoff. The AP Poll is likely to rank them high to start the year.

Cade Klubnik is back at QB after a career season and should get some Heisman love. Peter Woods and TJ Parker highlight a loaded front-seven for the Tigers on defense.

Marcus Freeman just led the Fighting Irish to the national championship, but fell short. Still, they are expected to be in the top 10 of the AP Poll.

Jeremiyah Love is back at RB and should get Heisman consideration. With another loaded defense, this team is certainly going to be a tough out.

The Ducks looked like they could run through the bracket at one point last year. But Oregon went 13-0, won the Big Ten and immediately lost a rematch to Ohio State in the CFP quarterfinals.

Dan Lanning and crew should be a top 10 team at minimum in the AP Poll Monday. How high they climb is anyone’s guess in a top heavy conference this season.

Alabama WR Ryan Williams
Alabama WR Ryan Williams (William McLelland / Imagn Images)

Kalen DeBoer enters Year 2 at Alabama with high expectations and some pressure. Making the College Football Playoff is the requirement in 2025.

Ty Simpson is projected to take over at QB and will be helped by star sophomore WR Ryan Williams. As far as the AP Poll is concerned, the Crimson Tide should firmly be in the top 10, albeit towards the bottom half of the top tier.

The Tigers and Brian Kelly are in Year 4 together, but there are expectations to win the SEC and get to the CFP. This team certainly could end up putting it together, judging by an AP Poll prediction in the top 10.

Garrett Nussmeier enters the 2025 season as one of the best quarterbacks in college football. Harold Perkins, if he returns to form, should be one of the more feared linebackers in the country.

The time is now for Miami and Mario Cristobal. They played with fire last season and ended up paying the price down the stretch.

Still, as a predicted top 10 team in the AP Poll, the Hurricanes will be in the running for the ACC and a CFP spot. Former Georgia QB Carson Beck takes over for No. 1 overall pick Cam Ward.

CBS Sports predicts AP Poll Top 25

11. Illinois
12. South Carolina
13. Arizona State
14. Michigan
15. Florida
16. Ole Miss
17. SMU
18. Tennessee
19. Indiana
20. Texas Tech
21. Texas A&M
22. Kansas State
23. Iowa State
24. Boise State
25. Oklahoma



Link

Continue Reading

NIL

Division II transfer Elyjah Freeman brings clear potential to Auburn

It’s not difficult to see the potential that lies within Elyjah Freeman. Whether it’s his high-flying dunks that find his head at the rim, or his promising shooting from the outside, Freeman is hoped by Auburn to be a diamond in the rough from this offseason’s transfer portal. The second-year wing is most concerned with […]

Published

on

Division II transfer Elyjah Freeman brings clear potential to Auburn

It’s not difficult to see the potential that lies within Elyjah Freeman.

Whether it’s his high-flying dunks that find his head at the rim, or his promising shooting from the outside, Freeman is hoped by Auburn to be a diamond in the rough from this offseason’s transfer portal.

The second-year wing is most concerned with simply getting comfortable with his new program and being the most complete player he can be. But his new teammates are fully aware of just how talented Freeman is.

“I’m sure you’ve all seen his highlights,” Texas Tech transfer guard Kevin Overton said. “He’s just so raw. He’s still only 18. All the stuff he doesn’t know — he’s very open-minded and coachable.”

Continue Reading

NIL

5 College Football Breakthrough Teams to Watch in 2025

5 College Football Breakthrough Teams to Watch in 2025 originally appeared on College Football News. Indiana, SMU, and Arizona State were big surprises last year, but will they have staying power? Will they be in their respective conference races for the foreseeable future? Which teams might not just surprise a wee bit, but appear to […]

Published

on


5 College Football Breakthrough Teams to Watch in 2025 originally appeared on College Football News.

Indiana, SMU, and Arizona State were big surprises last year, but will they have staying power? Will they be in their respective conference races for the foreseeable future?

Which teams might not just surprise a wee bit, but appear to have the upside and infrastructure to be consistent players?

Think Illinois and Navy of last year, Colorado of two years ago, and Louisville when Jeff Brohm took over. 

Which programs have the upside to be steadily above-average going forward?

Advertisement

College Football 2025: 5 Teams Ready for a Breakthrough Season

Sep 28, 2024; Lubbock, Texas, USA; Texas Tech Red Raiders quarterback Behren Morton (2) after the game against the Cincinnati Bearcats at Jones AT&T Stadium and Cody Campbell Field.© Michael C. Johnson-Imagn Images

Sep 28, 2024; Lubbock, Texas, USA; Texas Tech Red Raiders quarterback Behren Morton (2) after the game against the Cincinnati Bearcats at Jones AT&T Stadium and Cody Campbell Field.© Michael C. Johnson-Imagn Images

5. Houston

– Houston 2025 Preview

Willie Fritz needed a year to put things in place. Houston was a 12-win team in 2021, slid downhill for a few seasons, and now it should be far stronger with an offense that should start to produce.

If the team could’ve scored 21 points in every game last season, it would’ve gone 7-5 instead of 4-8. The D is fine, the O is better, and the schedule helps.

Stephen F. Austin, at Rice, Colorado, at Oregon State. There’s a real shot to match last year’s win total before October, and then comes …

– CFN Preview 2025

Advertisement

4. Texas Tech

– Texas Tech 2025 Preview

This might be the most fascinating team going into the 2025 season.

It was going to be fine, and then the portal kicked in hard with one of the best hauls of transfers of any program in the nation. 

Head coach Joey McGuire has done a great job in his first three years of making Texas Tech good, but with a very favorable home schedule and with a deep and loaded roster, this is when the staying power under McGuire is solidified.

3. Georgia Tech

– Georgia Tech 2025 Preview

After two straight 7-5 seasons under Brent Key, the Yellow Jackets return a ton of talent, a great veteran quarterback in Haynes King, and the experience and big wins to expect more.

The program hasn’t won more than seven games in a season since 2016, but with a schedule that should help with a base of winnable games out of Gardner-Webb, at Colorado, Temple, at Wake Forest, Syracuse, at Duke, at Boston College, and Pitt.

Advertisement

2. Illinois

– Illinois 2025 Preview

It all should work, and Illinois should finally have that second straight big season that shows just how good the program can be, but …

It should be Missouri. It should be Wisconsin – back when it was good at football. It should be good enough in that region of the country to be an annual problem for everyone else, but it hasn’t always worked out.

The 2001 team went to the Sugar Bowl. The program won 13 games over the next five years. 

The 2007 team went to the Rose Bowl. Next year, Illinois went 5-7.

There’s a chance Bret Bielema becomes the first Illinois head coach to own two double-digit win seasons. His 2025 team is just that good.

(And there’s no Penn State, Michigan, or Oregon to face.)

1. USF

– USF Team Preview

This feels like the 29th straight season of expecting USF to bust through and be a consistent national factor, but this year’s team might be it.

Alex Golesh put up two straight 7-6 seasons after taking over a program that won a total of eight games in the previous four years, but it wasn’t all that long ago that USF won 11 games under Willie Taggart in 2016, and then ten more under Charlie Strong a year later.  

The Bulls are loaded with returning veterans, the last two years built up to this point, and if they can get past a brutal start – Boise State, at Florida, and at Miami – they should rip through the rest of the slate. They should get to eight wins or more for the first time since 2017.

Related: 5 College Football Teams Headed For a Letdown in 2025

This story was originally reported by College Football News on Aug 10, 2025, where it first appeared.



Link

Continue Reading

NIL

Projecting Top 25 ahead of season

The start of the college football season is officially right around the corner when the AP Top 25 poll drops. It will do so on Monday. Ahead of the big reveal, On3 has taken a stab at projecting the initial AP Top 25 rankings. We’ve included the full projection, tabbing the 25 teams we think […]

Published

on


The start of the college football season is officially right around the corner when the AP Top 25 poll drops. It will do so on Monday.

Ahead of the big reveal, On3 has taken a stab at projecting the initial AP Top 25 rankings. We’ve included the full projection, tabbing the 25 teams we think the Associated Press will deem worthy of being ranked.

So without wasting any time, let’s get into it. Who is the projected No. 1 team in this year’s preseason AP poll?

Arguably no team in America has a quarterback as hyped as Arch Manning. He’s been waiting in the wings for two years, and now it’s his team. He’s got ample weapons to work with, too, on a clear preseason top 25 squad.

Quintrevion Wisner is a monster at running back, having already proven what he can do. Ryan Wingo will help anchor a receiving corps that includes some major new talent, including Five-Star Plus+ freshman Kaliq Lockett. The schedule is once again quite tough, though, starting with the opener against Ohio State.

Penn State quarterback Drew Allar (Photo credit: Steve Manuel/BWI)
Penn State quarterback Drew Allar (Photo credit: Steve Manuel/BWI)

Penn State has a returning starter at quarterback. Drew Allar wasn’t asked to do a ton for most of last year, but he slowly came into his own and was playing really good football by year’s end.

From top to bottom, Penn State might have the most talented roster in the country. There are still question marks about the quality of the receivers, but that might be the only real iffy spot on the roster.

Georgia lost a talented starting quarterback from the 2024 squad, with Carson Beck taking off for Miami. Gunner Stockton, who filled in for Beck due to injury in the College Football Playoffs, will take over the reins for the preseason top 25 contender.

Kirby Smart‘s recruiting over the years will, of course, always have Georgia competitive. Can the Bulldogs manage a schedule that includes games against both Alabama and Texas, as well as Ole Miss, Tennessee and Florida?

With a quarterback battle ongoing, it’s not entirely clear who will lead Ohio State out against Texas in Week 1. Whoever it is will have the luxury of working with Jeremiah Smith, arguably the best skill position player in the game, as well as an excellent supporting cast.

The Buckeyes also have talent all over the field on the opposite side, with Caleb Downs leading what should once again be a loaded defense. The good news, schedule-wise? Ohio State avoids Oregon this year.

Cade Klubnik, Clemson
Cade Klubnik, Clemson – © Jerome Miron-Imagn Images

There’s a common theme with much of the Top 10 going into the year. Most of the teams have a good returning quarterback. That’s certainly the case at Clemson, where the Tigers have Cade Klubnik back and more confident than ever.

But the Tigers are also loaded along the defensive front, potentially as talented as they’ve been there in years. The schedule starts off with a bang — a Top-10 LSU team is coming to town — so we’ll learn about how ready Clemson is in a hurry.

When you’ve got a weapon like Jeremiyah Love in the backfield, you have a chance to have a special offense. The Fighting Irish have to figure out the quarterback position after losing Riley Leonard, but that gets easier to do with a workhorse back.

The schedule might be the tricky part to navigate. Notre Dame takes on Miami and Arkansas on the road, as well as Texas A&M and USC at home. There are a handful of other potential stumbling blocks, but the four aforementioned are likely the biggest hurdles.

Jalen Milroe is gone, so Alabama will probably be much closer to Kalen DeBoer‘s ideal offense in 2025. But that’s some elite playmaking lost. Milroe ran for 20 touchdowns a year ago and that’s never easy to replace.

Still, the Crimson Tide have an abundance of talent. The schedule is difficult but not outrageous, with road trips to Georgia and South Carolina and a home date with LSU the toughest outs.

Oregon Football Schedule
USA Today Sports

Oregon replaces starting quarterback Dillon Gabriel but has former Five-Star Plus+ prospect Dante Moore waiting in the wings. The rest of the offensive cast is loaded with talent, even after losing a couple star skill players to the NFL.

The Ducks also really lucked out on the schedule. Not only do they avoid the Buckeyes, but they also don’t take on Michigan this fall. A road trip to Penn State will be brutal, but every other game on the schedule looks like it will have Oregon favored, a surefire sign of a Top 25 team.

The Tigers have a Heisman-caliber quarterback returning in Garrett Nussmeier, and he’ll be counted on to lead Brian Kelly‘s squad out of the perennial 9- to 10-win range and into the Playoffs. He’s good enough to get that done.

As noted with Clemson, the start of the season will tell us a lot. That season opener could provide a lot of confidence for the team going forward… or it could create a wave of noise for Kelly and company to deal with.

Cam Ward is gone and replacing the No. 1 pick in the NFL Draft won’t be easy. But you can’t do much better in terms of landing a high-profile guy than Carson Beck. Beck has settled in nicely early in fall camp, throwing again after his season-ending injury in 2024.

Mario Cristobal has clearly elevated the talent on the roster at Miami and there’s been tangible year-over-year improvement. Can the Hurricanes put it all together and avoid the mental slip-ups that cost them key games last year?

Rest of the Projected AP Top 25: 11-25

11. Illinois Fighting Illini
12. Arizona State Sun Devils
13. Michigan Wolverines
14. South Carolina Gamecocks
15. Kansas State Wildcats
16. Florida Gators
17. SMU Mustangs
18. Ole Miss Rebels
19. Tennessee Volunteers
20. Oklahoma Sooners
21. Texas Tech Red Raiders
22. Texas A&M Aggies
23. Indiana Hoosiers
24. Iowa State Cyclones
25. Louisville Cardinals



Link

Continue Reading

NIL

Inside Conditions: Who’s using who? NIL is a good thing for the student-athletes

THE CLEVELAND BROWNS ROOKIE QB, SHEDEUR SANDERS In the movie “Jerry Maguire,” Cuba Gooding Jr. demanded at the top of his lungs for the world to: “Show me the money.” According to espn.com: “College athletes weren’t always allowed to make money off their athletic ability. It wasn’t until 2021 that the NCAA changed rules to […]

Published

on


THE CLEVELAND BROWNS ROOKIE QB, SHEDEUR SANDERS

In the movie “Jerry Maguire,” Cuba Gooding Jr. demanded at the top of his lungs for the world to: “Show me the money.”

According to espn.com: “College athletes weren’t always allowed to make money off their athletic ability. It wasn’t until 2021 that the NCAA changed rules to allow students to profit from their name, image and likeness—otherwise known as NIL.”

In less than 5 years, the powers-that-be have developed a specialized army and arsenal designed to attack and disarm the NIL concept for college athletes as if the NIL is an immigrant and a usurper of tradition, attempting to illegally cross a secure economic border designed to limit and/or eliminate any financial advantages for amateur athletes and allow the “haves” to operate with access to unlimited profit.

Before the NIL concept was created and sanctioned less than 5 years ago, the greed-mongers at the NCAA wielded the power to charge, try, convict and sentence any college athlete for accepting gifts of any kind from boosters or fans and possibly even mom and dad as long as they were performing as “amateur athletes.” Those who were exposed while doing so usually faced severe punishment such as suspension or expulsion, even while the NCAA simultaneously raked in dough like it were leaves being shed by 10,000 oak trees in the middle of autumn, in the state of Maine.

During the ensuing four years, many disgruntled head coaches in the college ranks have been staunchly resistant to change within the college ranks and elsewhere. Why? Well, simply because their reservoir of free labor was on the pathway to drying up.

JC Shelton recently posted an article on si.com titled: “Nick Saban makes his stance crystal clear on Donald Trump’s NIL executive order.” Mr. Shelton writes: “President Donald Trump’s executive order will benefit college athletes in the Name, Image and Likeness space, according to former Alabama head coach Nick Saban. Saban, who was mentioned by Trump as a potential leader for the College Sports Commission back in May, addressed the newly signed executive order that seeks ‘balanced use of resources across collegiate athletic programs that preserves their educational and developmental benefits.’”

In the article, Saban said: “I think we need to make a decision here relative to do we want to have an education-based model, which I think the president made a huge step towards doing that, or do we want to have universities sponsor professional teams.”

Wait a minute. Saban had the nerve to say that “the newly signed executive order seeks balanced use of resources across collegiate athletic programs that preserves their educational and developmental benefits.”

No one mentions balancing resources when it comes to coaches being paid tens of millions of dollars. The NCAA and college coaches care as much about the educational value of these “student-athletes” no more than a Swiss bank cares about opening up an account with a client from Compton carrying a valid EBT card. The order also “prohibits third-party, pay-for-play payments to collegiate athletes.”

Are they stuck on stupid? Duh, that’s what the NIL concept is designed for: to “pay for play.”

Tommy Tuberville is the ex-Auburn University head-football-coach-turned-Senator as well as being one of the architects and disciples of the new and “reimagined Confederacy.” Tuberville was recently quoted in an article posted by Steven Corder on athlonsports.com titled: “U.S. Senator turns heads by wanting more control over NIL. As college athletes cash in on NIL deals, Senator Tommy Tuberville pushes for sweeping reforms—and a crackdown on player freedom and compensation.”

Mr. Corder writes, “But let’s be clear: Tuberville isn’t just concerned with fairness—he wants control. In an earlier radio interview, Tuberville spelled out what he envisions: ‘Everybody would be on the same level. We’ve got to come up with some rules for the transfer portal, possibly a contract for players.’”

Translation? Less money, less mobility, and more regulation on the athletes who are finally seeing their value recognized.

And he’s not alone. Tuberville cited conversations with Auburn basketball coach Bruce Pearl, who called NIL and the transfer portal “an absolute disaster.” But who’s it really a disaster for? Players like Livvy Dunne, Bronny James and Shedeur Sanders raked in millions—earning what the market says they’re worth. One recently estimated Dunne’s NIL valuation at $3.9 million, while Sanders was close to $4.6 million.

The outcry from coaches and politicians sounds less like concern for college sports and more like panic over a shift in power dynamics. Tuberville’s push to restrict freedom and earning potential paints a clear picture: they want amateurism for the players and professionalism for everyone else.

Glory, glory hallelujah, the truth is not marching on. However, let’s be perfectly clear. The truth has fled from the building. Tuberville has shucked and jived and jived and freely shucked our young athletes and their parents as if they were ears of corn at harvest time, not just for days, but for months, years and decades with little or no resistance. However, as soon as some of these athletes were economically emancipated, Tommy Tuberville and others like him abandoned their false “educational principles” and dove into the “sea of politics” to rescue and place a lifejacket around the drowning “play for no pay” mandate. Folks are again seeking to restore and place the generational yoke of servitude around the shoulders of the “play for no pay” athletes. Many of those athletes will have bleak or no futures after their college careers have ended.

The late Bill Withers composed a song about a girlfriend whose love was so pleasurable, he didn’t even mind being taken advantage of and being used by her. Withers sang, “Yes, I wanna spread the news, that if it feels this good gettin’ used. Oh, you just keep on usin’ me, until you use me up.”

Tommy Tuberville, Nick Saban and their cronies have altered the lyrics ever so slightly. Their version of the song goes something like this. “We’re gonna spread the news, that it’s good being able to use. We’re gonna keep on using you. Until we use you up.” 

The only way parents and their athletic children can be used is if they continue to allow themselves to be.

 

 

 

 

About Post Author



Link

Continue Reading

NIL

The Potential Impact of Trump's NIL Draft Order on Athletes

President Donald Trump has signed an executive order that may change the future of name, image and likeness in collegiate athletics. The order, titled “Saving College Sports,” notably discusses some current unknowns inside the NIL process. It also aims to introduce more policy and structure to existing NIL deals. Ever since a draft of the […]

Published

on

The Potential Impact of Trump's NIL Draft Order on Athletes

President Donald Trump has signed an executive order that may change the future of name, image and likeness in collegiate athletics. The order, titled “Saving College Sports,” notably discusses some current unknowns inside the NIL process. It also aims to introduce more policy and structure to existing NIL deals. Ever since a draft of the order was released a few weeks ago, it has sparked debate amongst many about the consequences for college sports.

This order has been drafted in sequence to the recent House v. NCAA settlement, which allows schools to share up to $20.5 million in revenue with athletes in exchange for their NIL rights. The decision has marked a significant change in college athletics, where student-athletes can benefit from more financial opportunities from the school. However, the executive order creates more uncertainty about what a student-athlete is and what they represent. For example, are they now an employee of the school? And, how is this fair from school to school?

Order details

The first key topic in the order relates to an increase in antitrust protection for colleges. This is important to prevent monopolies from being created in the realm of collegiate sports. The compensation limits in the House settlement may result in more lawsuits if Congress does not grant universities an antitrust exemption. There is currently an exemption being considered. However, the president does not have the right to grant antitrust exemptions. The order does ask, however, in a section titled “Legal Protections For College Athletics from Lawsuits,” that the Federal Trade Commission and Attorney General “review and, as necessary, revise” their policy and prepare litigation processes for future antitrust lawsuits.

Another key point in the order is the instruction to the National Labor Relations Board to officially decide student-employee status. If the NLRB were to keep college athletes as non-employees of the school and views them as amateur student-athletes, that would mean schools do not need to provide benefits, salaries and union rights, like the professional leagues do. It also would suggest universities would then be further protected against lawsuits involving athlete compensation and labor enforcement.

Debate

NIL has undoubtedly changed the game, as well as the consequences of House v NCAA. Athletes now have more control and say in their future, financially and in what team they can represent. However, NIL has many consequences and things that must be debated in the future. Players can now switch teams each year with no penalty, as well as being able to continuously look for the best deal, and sometimes not the best fit. Many argue that this has changed the culture of college sports, and maybe not for the better.

Last year, former legendary Alabama football coach Nick Saban testified for a hearing on NIL rules with the Senate. He stated that players now show “less resiliency to overcome adversity” as well as claiming NFL coaches told him today’s players are too entitled, caring too much about college NIL money. But others argue that the players deserve payment since it’s their choice and their body they put on the line.

The NCAA is also having a debate on how to maintain and enforce recruitment and funding for the NIL boosters and agencies. A good example of an NIL booster is the Crimson Fund, in which Utah alumni and local companies can donate to help fund student-athletes. Currently, as there is no national standard for NIL boosters, many questions arise about who such boosters truly benefit. If we see a push for NIL rule uniformity, a potential result is an increased balance in teams that are not currently receiving these funds. This would allow players to go where their value is represented.

MSNBC writer Julie Hunyh gave her opinion on the matter, stating, “The world of college sports is already unrecognizable from what it was a few years ago, new conflicts are arising that haven’t existed before, and the NCAA’s inconsistencies against the shifting political landscape have left many athletes uncertain about their futures.”

[email protected]

@lukeskinnerr.bsky.social

Continue Reading

Most Viewed Posts

Trending