NIL
What the last 5 years of the NFL Draft tells us about college football recruiting
In many ways, the NFL Draft serves as the ultimate finish line in recruiting. It provides a final tale of the tape in determining which programs delivered on their promise of helping these athletes fulfill their professional dreams. NIL, the transfer portal and conference realignment have altered the state of college football quite a bit […]

In many ways, the NFL Draft serves as the ultimate finish line in recruiting.
It provides a final tale of the tape in determining which programs delivered on their promise of helping these athletes fulfill their professional dreams.
NIL, the transfer portal and conference realignment have altered the state of college football quite a bit over the last few years. But recruits still typically prioritize getting to the NFL when making their decisions.
So, who has done the best job of that in recent years? We studied the last five years of the draft — all 1,294 picks and where those players came from — to try to figure it out.
Here is a collection of thoughts on various subjects.
Note: All recruiting rankings are from the 247Sports Composite.
Stars still matter
People love to criticize recruiting services, especially when players such as Cam Ward — an unranked prospect coming out of high school in south Texas — become the first pick in the NFL draft.
But the reality is that blue-chip recruits (four- and five-stars) still dominate the draft. Ward is the anomaly.
NFL Draft (2021-25) by recruiting stars
Round | Picks | 5-star | 4-star | 3-star | 2-star | Unranked |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1st |
160 |
26% |
39% |
29% |
1% |
4% |
2nd |
160 |
10% |
41% |
39% |
3% |
6% |
3rd |
194 |
7% |
35% |
38% |
6% |
14% |
4th |
181 |
6% |
27% |
43% |
7% |
18% |
5th |
197 |
6% |
31% |
46% |
6% |
12% |
6th |
210 |
4% |
24% |
47% |
8% |
17% |
7th |
192 |
2% |
29% |
43% |
8% |
19% |
In the last five years, only seven players who were not ranked at all in the 247Sports Composite (4.3 percent) were among the 160 players taken in the first round of the draft. An overwhelming majority (80.1 percent) of the players drafted overall (not just in the first round) were ranked as three-stars or better.
On average, there are roughly 32 five-star recruits and somewhere between 300 to 400 four-stars among the thousands of high school prospects per cycle.
In the recent five-year draft window, 65 percent of the first-round picks (104 of 160) and 52 percent of the players taken in the first three rounds (267 of 514) were blue-chip recruits coming out of high school.
State supremacy
Texas, Florida, Georgia and California have long been considered the biggest hotbeds for football talent, and nothing has changed.
Those four states continue to be the biggest producers of NFL players, with Georgia (20) taking a small lead over Texas (19) for first-round selections.
Here’s a look at the top 10 NFL talent producers over the last five years by state, including how many of those total selections were blue-chip recruits.
Top talent-producing states
State | Picks | 1st RD. | Blue-chip % |
---|---|---|---|
Texas |
157 |
19 |
42% |
Florida |
139 |
16 |
40% |
Georgia |
120 |
20 |
47% |
California |
96 |
17 |
52% |
Louisiana |
53 |
7 |
49% |
Ohio |
49 |
2 |
39% |
North Carolina |
48 |
7 |
35% |
Alabama |
43 |
2 |
33% |
Michigan |
41 |
6 |
34% |
Maryland |
40 |
6 |
48% |
Years in school
One outside factor you have to consider when looking at all data is how the COVID-19 pandemic affected recruiting and draft results. The NCAA granted an extra year of eligibility to all players who participated in the 2020 season.
That certainly didn’t stop the best players in college football from making a quick exit for the draft if they could. Nearly one in five draft picks over the last five years still made the jump to the pros after only three seasons in school.
Here’s a look at where players were drafted by the amount of time they spent in college.
NFL Draft picks by years in college
Years | Picks | 1st rd. | Blue-chip % |
---|---|---|---|
3 |
249 |
91 |
87% |
4 |
430 |
45 |
44% |
5 |
469 |
22 |
55% |
6 |
141 |
2 |
0% |
7 |
5 |
0 |
0% |
Big schools vs. small schools
Playing for a Power 4 program — there are currently 69 — still gives a player the best odds of getting drafted.
Just under 84 percent of the NFL Draft picks over the last five years played their last college game for a school that was in a Power 4 league (or Notre Dame) at the time.
The transfer portal has affected those numbers, with many of the Power 4 players drafted having started their careers at a lower level. In all, nearly a quarter of the players drafted over the last five years (26.4 percent) signed with a junior college, FCS, Division II or Group of 5 program out of high school.
Portal powering up
The reality, however, is that three-fourths of the players taken in the draft over the last five years played for only one college program.
That number, however, is decreasing as the number of transfers increases every year.
Of the 257 players selected in this year’s draft, 96 transferred at least once. That’s 37 percent. In 2021, only 10 percent of the draft picks (27 of the 259) were transfers.
Only two first-round picks in both 2021 and 2022 were transfers — quarterback Justin Fields and edge rusher Jaelen Phillips in 2021 and receiver Jameson Williams and guard Zion Johnson in 2022. That number jumped to five in 2023, peaked at nine in 2024 and dipped to seven this year.
Top schools
It shouldn’t surprise anyone that the top 50 programs in terms of producing NFL Draft picks over the last five years reside in Power 4 conferences. It also shouldn’t come as a surprise that the four programs that won national titles over the last five years top that list.
NFL Draft picks by college
School
|
Picks ▼ |
1st Rd.
|
2nd-3rd Rd.
|
Transfers
|
---|---|---|---|---|
55 |
14 |
17 |
6 |
|
44 |
16 |
15 |
8 |
|
42 |
8 |
15 |
5 |
|
40 |
11 |
12 |
5 |
|
36 |
6 |
9 |
7 |
|
33 |
7 |
10 |
6 |
|
33 |
6 |
9 |
6 |
|
30 |
6 |
7 |
14 |
|
27 |
2 |
11 |
3 |
|
25 |
5 |
4 |
7 |
|
23 |
2 |
7 |
13 |
|
22 |
5 |
5 |
0 |
|
22 |
2 |
6 |
8 |
|
22 |
4 |
6 |
10 |
|
21 |
2 |
6 |
6 |
The last five drafts include players from the 2015 through the 2022 recruiting cycles. Only one of the top 15 programs in terms of producing NFL talent over the last five years ranked outside of the top 25 when it came to average recruiting class rankings: South Carolina, which still ranked in the top 30.
What’s far more impressive from a development standpoint are the Power 4 programs that ranked outside of the top 40 in recruiting rankings yet produced NFL talent at a top-40 level.
The Pitt Panthers top the list among those schools with 20 draft picks over the last five years, including two first-rounders — second most in the ACC behind Clemson (22). Of those 20 picks, only three were transfers, and among the 17 homegrown talents, only one was a blue-chip recruit coming out of high school (safety Damar Hamlin).
Before he left for Wisconsin in November 2022, Luke Fickel did an equally impressive job stocking the shelves with NFL talent at Cincinnati — and did so before the program joined a Power 4 conference. The Bearcats have had 18 players drafted over the last five years. Four were transfers, including the only three blue-chippers to get drafted from Cincinnati. The rest were rated three-stars or lower, including top-five pick Sauce Gardner, who was the No. 1,605 prospect in the 2019 cycle.
Kansas State, Iowa State, Illinois, Purdue and Minnesota all ranked in the top 40 of NFL talent producers with 13 picks each despite ranking outside of the top 50 in the recruiting rankings.
These are the top non-Power 4 talent producers over the last five years. (Oregon State and Washington State are not on this list since they were both P4 programs during the recruiting cycles. Neither are BYU, Cincinnati, Houston and UCF since they are now in a P4 league.)
Positional U
Schools love to claim they’re the best at producing talent by position.
We’ve gone ahead and done the homework to end the argument, at least for recent history.
Quarterback: Alabama, Florida and Ohio State all have the right to call themselves the best at producing pro talent at the moment, with three draft picks each at the position over the last five years. We’d give the slight edge to the Buckeyes, considering Fields and C.J. Stroud were first-rounders and Stroud is an entrenched NFL starter.
Running back: Michigan and Texas lead the way with five draft picks each over the last five years, with Alabama, Georgia and North Carolina not far behind with four each. You could make the argument that Pro Bowler Bijan Robinson gives Texas the edge with how he’s performed early in his pro career.
Receiver: Ohio State has produced five first-round picks at the position over the last five years, including top-10 picks in Marvin Harrison and Garrett Wilson. And Jeremiah Smith could be the No. 1 pick in the 2027 draft. But don’t forget about LSU. The Tigers have had six receivers taken in the last five years and have stars Ja’Marr Chase, Malik Nabers and Brian Thomas Jr. doing damage in the league now.
Tight end: Nobody has produced more draft picks in the last five years at tight end than Penn State with four, and that includes 2025 first-rounder Tyler Warren. But it’s hard to ignore the impact of Georgia’s Brock Bowers, and the Bulldogs are one of a handful of programs (Miami, Michigan and Ohio State are the others) to have three tight ends drafted since 2021.
Offensive line: Georgia leads with 11 picks, but only two were first-rounders. Ohio State is next with nine, including three first-rounders. LSU and Michigan have produced eight, with Will Campbell representing the Tigers in Round 1. No O-linemen from Michigan, meanwhile, have been drafted in the first two rounds.
Defensive line: Georgia has had 11 defensive linemen drafted since 2021, including seven first-rounders. LSU, with 10, ranks second, but none of the Tigers have gone in the first round. Alabama, Michigan and Ohio State are next with nine picks each, with the Wolverines boasting five first-rounders — most notably Aidan Hutchinson.
Linebackers: Only nine players classified as linebackers have been taken in the first round in the last five years, and Penn State’s Micah Parsons is one of them. Georgia’s Quay Walker is another and is among the six from the Bulldogs. Clemson, Michigan, Notre Dame, Ohio State, Washington and Penn State are next, each with four linebackers drafted.
Defensive backs: Why has Georgia been so good? Probably because it keeps producing the most NFL talent at every defensive position. The Bulldogs have had 13 defensive backs picked, including three first-rounders in Lewis Cline, Malaki Starks and Eric Stokes. Alabama is next with nine, followed by Penn State with eight.
Top recruiters
Recruiting sites do a fine job of highlighting the coaches who sign the most high-end prospects, but how much does this really tell us? You mean an assistant coach at Georgia is good at signing top talent? Shocking!
Here are a few recruiters who have done good work at some programs that don’t sign top-10 classes on a consistent basis — and we acknowledge that this can be a bit cloudy considering not every prospect has a clearly defined lead recruiter.
Fresno State head coach Matt Entz: The two-time FCS Coach of the Year had three players from his North Dakota State teams drafted in the last few years, including 2025 first-round pick Grey Zabel and second-rounders Dillon Radunz and Cody Mauch. All three players were either two-star or unranked recruits.
Idaho defensive coordinator Cort Dennison: The former Louisville and Oregon assistant did a fine job plucking quality three-star recruits out of the Southeast, including quarterback Jordan Travis, receiver Tutu Atwell and defensive lineman Brandon Dorlus. Five of his former three-stars were drafted over the last five years.
Kentucky tight ends coach Vince Marrow: The longtime assistant has been the lead recruiter for five Kentucky players who have been drafted in the last five years.
Washington defensive coordinator Ryan Walters: In his time at Missouri, Walters was the lead recruiter for six players who were eventually drafted. All of them were three-star recruits, and four ranked in the 1,000s.
West Virginia special teams coach Chris Haering: The former longtime Wisconsin assistant recruited six Badgers who were drafted, including Super Bowl-winning linebacker Leo Chenal.
(Photo of Bo Nix: Christian Petersen / Getty Images)
NIL
Maine authors write kid’s book about a different use of N.I.L.
WATERVILLE, Maine (WABI) – Name, image and likeness have been in the headlines in recent years allowing college and high school to be paid. Some have used it as a platform for their passions. “If you are passionate about something like curing cancer and you want to let people know and you want the world […]

WATERVILLE, Maine (WABI) – Name, image and likeness have been in the headlines in recent years allowing college and high school to be paid. Some have used it as a platform for their passions.
“If you are passionate about something like curing cancer and you want to let people know and you want the world to know, we can go out and tell that story,” answered Founder and C.E.O. of Pliable Marketing Greg Glynn.
Pliable is an N.I.L. company allowing college and high school athletes from the around the country to brand themselves and tell their story.
Two of Greg’s athletes, Hannah Dukeman and Emma Eubank, softball players out of Indiana wanted to use N.I.L. for something else other than money.
“They had told me they wanted to cure childhood cancer,” recalled Greg. “They had raised over four thousand and five hundred dollars because they had created cleats that we put together that said #CureCancer.”
That’s where ‘The Magic Cleats’ came along. A children’s book Greg, along with his daughter Kelsey wrote about the story.
But also in the pages you can find spotlights on other female athletes branding themselves through N.I.L.
“I love seeing all the girls like Maddie Niles, Emma Eubank and Logan Hale and I love seeing them being able to help their communities too and what their passionate about,” said Kelsey.
Greg says it can be a book to inspire younger girls to see firsthand what’s possible. But don’t let the pictures fool you, it’s not just for kids.
“I think parents as well, I know the target audience is children but it’s a reminder to parents that enable your kids to do what they want to do,” commented Greg.
It’s stars like Mia Hamm from back in the day and now Caitlin Clark that have helped prop up the respect, coverage and recognition of women athletes and while Greg says the growth has been impressive, there’s still plenty of room to grow.
“We’re trying to go out there and help women realize that they can do amazing things,” said Greg. “This is not just about making all kinds of money, this is about building your brand and making sure that you are doing the things that you’re passionate about for you and what you want to do in your career and that’s going to lead to your success long-term. I know what’s coming for women’s sports and I know the passion that these women have. They are the underdog story and this story is far from over.”
If you want to check out the book for yourself, head on down to Oliver & Friends Bookshop in Waterville, through a quick Amazon search or head to the Pliable Marketing website here.
There will also be a book signing on August 2nd at Oliver & Friends.
Copyright 2025 WABI. All rights reserved.
NIL
SMU teams up with Scout to help student-athletes think ‘name, image, lifetime’
Southern Methodist University is tapping into the widening nexus between sports and business, partnering with a financial tech company to offer money management options for student athletes. SMU Athletics and financial tech company Scout will offer in-app finance management and investment assistance, Scout announced in a release. Name, image, likeness (NIL) deals have become increasingly […]

Southern Methodist University is tapping into the widening nexus between sports and business, partnering with a financial tech company to offer money management options for student athletes.
SMU Athletics and financial tech company Scout will offer in-app finance management and investment assistance, Scout announced in a release. Name, image, likeness (NIL) deals have become increasingly commonplace, creating newfound wealth for student athletes fortunate enough to win large contracts.
“We ask our players to think long-term: to grow, to evolve, to prepare,” Head Football Coach Rhett Lashlee said in a statement. “This partnership is a perfect example of that mindset.”
Contract deals vary widely based on the athlete. But in some cases, big-name athletes are reaping deals of six ― and sometimes seven ― figures, as NIL agreements shake up college sports, minting riches for a new generation of players.
In an acknowledgment of how even professional athletes need wealth preservation skills, RISE Family Office hosted its annual symposium in Frisco last week, which is designed to give money tips to current and former players.
In partnership with Scout, SMU is signaling their long-term commitment to helping athletes and administrators navigate the business of sports – now and in the future.
Scout CEO Michael Haddix Jr., a former Division I basketball athlete and Columbia-educated investment banker, founded Scout with the mission of “helping today’s college athletes take control of the present and plan for a secure future.”
“We look at NIL differently at Scout – for us, it means Name, Image…Lifetime,” Haddix said.
Scout helps users navigate the fast-changing NIL landscape, offering in-app tools for revenue-share distribution, cap management, and personalized financial literacy training. SMU athletes will have access to a secure player wallet app for savings, tax withholding, and investment planning.
Team administrators benefit, too. Scout’s administrative portal allows SMU coaches to securely distribute athlete payments, model salary caps for teams, ensure compliance, and generate reports.
“This partnership with Scout puts the infrastructure in place to support our student-athletes in a dynamic, fast-changing NIL environment, not just for now, but for years to come,” Damon Evans, SMU’s Director of Athletics said.
Since its founding in 2014, Scout has partnered with the University of Tennessee, Iowa, Mississippi State, and Auburn University, among others.
And SMU is joining the fleet, ushering in a new era of student-athlete support as NIL continues to transform college athletics.
“At SMU, we’re not building for the moment – we’re building for the future,” Evans said.
NIL
Texas Tech football players, team among best in EA Sports College Football 26 video game
Texas Tech football fans who enjoyed the return of the EA Sports College Football will have a bit more fun playing with the Red Raiders this year. Set to release next week, EA Sports College Football 26 will feature some improvements from last year’s return, including the addition of coaches. Joey McGuire, defensive coordinator Shiel […]

Texas Tech football fans who enjoyed the return of the EA Sports College Football will have a bit more fun playing with the Red Raiders this year.
Set to release next week, EA Sports College Football 26 will feature some improvements from last year’s return, including the addition of coaches. Joey McGuire, defensive coordinator Shiel Wood and offensive coordinator Mack Leftwich are set to appear in this year’s game.
Texas Tech is set to be one of the best teams in this year’s game, as well. EA Sports has been revealing team and player rankings leading up to the release and the Red Raiders are well represented.
The revamped Texas Tech defense is ranked ninth overall in the game, coming in with a rating of 92. The Red Raider offense earned a rating of 87, putting Tech 18th in the game.
As a team, Texas Tech is the 13th-best team in the game with a rating of 86. This comes with a number of players being highly ranked as well.Need a break? Play the USA TODAY Daily Crossword Puzzle.
Texas Tech football player ratings in EA Sports College Football 26
Stanford EDGE transfer David Bailey is the highest-rated Red Raider in the game, earning a 93 overall. He is the 16th-ranked player in the game and the fifth-ranked defensive end in the game. Linebacker Jacob Rodriguez earned a rating of 91 to be placed among the Top 100 players in the game.
Ten other Red Raider earned ratings of 86 or higher. UCF transfer defensive tackle Lee Hunter is an 89; tight end Terrance Carter Jr. an 88; quarterback Behren Morton, receiver Reggie Virgil Jr and offensive lineman Vinny Sciury each earned 87s; and receiver Caleb Douglas, running back Quinten Joyner, EDGE Romello Height and offensive linemen Davion Cater and Sheridan Wilson all earned 86s.
NIL
Illini’s 2025 over/under; Deeper cut difference makers; Will House make intended impact?
Now that we are getting close to the start of the football season, would you be over or under at an 8.5 win total for the regular season. 8.5 is a far better number than the real 7.5 number on the Illini, in my opinion. While Illinois has a chance to go under 7.5 if […]

Now that we are getting close to the start of the football season, would you be over or under at an 8.5 win total for the regular season.
8.5 is a far better number than the real 7.5 number on the Illini, in my opinion. While Illinois has a chance to go under 7.5 if things don’t go well, I’d say over 7.5 is far more likely given the roster and schedule — assuming health, of course.
I have to think a lot harder about 8.5, and to be honest, that’s around where my projection will be. Winning nine or 10 games with 10 Power Four opponents on the schedule, including nine Big Ten teams, is very difficult. Illinois definitely is capable, but it’s also capable of going under 8.5 wins as well.
NIL
Revenue Share Breakdown Could Create Advantage For Mid-Major
iStockphoto / © Grace Hollars/IndyStar / USA TODAY NETWORK via Imagn Images Audio By Carbonatix Division-I colleges and universities were allowed to share revenue with their student-athletes for the first time on Tuesday, which actually creates a competitive advantage for mid-major basketball programs. Smaller schools with FCS football programs are able to distribute more money […]



Audio By Carbonatix
Division-I colleges and universities were allowed to share revenue with their student-athletes for the first time on Tuesday, which actually creates a competitive advantage for mid-major basketball programs. Smaller schools with FCS football programs are able to distribute more money elsewhere.
It will be interesting to see whether this new era of collegiate athletics allows for more parity on the hardwood.
The last four years of Name, Image and Likeness were largely unregulated. There were no rules. Schools, through their NIL collectives, were able to spend whatever amount of money they wanted on any player in any sport without any guidelines on how to operate. Inducements were common. Tampering was rampant.
Although some of that behavior will surely continue under the table, this new revenue sharing model is supposed to provide some semblance of structure when it comes to finances across college sports. Universities must operate under a set cap for direct compensation. Outside NIL deals must undergo approval from an outside entity. The entire pay scale will be limited. (We’ll see!)
Generally speaking, SEC programs will have a maximum annual budget of approximately $21 million. Approximately $14 million will go to football, $4 million to men’s basketball, $1 million to women’s basketball and $2 million to the other sports combined. Those numbers will obviously vary.
This is where smaller schools might find some common ground if they do not compete in college football on the FBS level. They can pump more money toward college basketball.
Smaller schools could choose to split its revenue share money as follows:
- TOTAL — $4.8 million
- Men’s basketball: $2.66 million
- Football: $1.31 million
- Women’s basketball: $485,000
- Other sports: $350,000
The $2.66 million for men’s basketball is not too far off from $4 million at SEC schools. That $2.66 million number is more or less on par with high-major programs.
However, those numbers are not the same at every school. Some mid-majors have larger goals for compensation. Others have less.
Athletic departments could spend a similar amount of money on basketball as the “bigger” schools that focus on football to be just as competitive in terms of compensation as, say, Wisconsin. It will be interesting to see how this plays out. How long will those “bigger” schools allow for this somewhat level playing field? When will they starts pumping more money in the direction of men’s basketball?
NIL
Highly
As Summer officially kicks off, one USC Trojans football player continues to stay hydrated with NIL deals ahead of his first season in Los Angeles. A month after partnering with C4 Energy, top JUCO transfer Waymond Jordan has added another beverage brand to his growing portfolio. The former No. 1 ranked junior college running back […]


As Summer officially kicks off, one USC Trojans football player continues to stay hydrated with NIL deals ahead of his first season in Los Angeles.
A month after partnering with C4 Energy, top JUCO transfer Waymond Jordan has added another beverage brand to his growing portfolio. The former No. 1 ranked junior college running back – who enrolled at USC this Spring after dominating the ground game for Kansas’ Hutchinson Community College – has now signed a deal with Niagara Water.
First reported by On3’s Pete Nakos, Jordan joins the Southern California-based water brand that counts USC wide receiver Ja’Kobi Lane and former Trojan cornerback Jaylin Smith – now a rookie with the Houston Texans – as brand ambassadors.
As a sophomore at Hutchinson CC last season, Jordan earned NJCAA DI Football Offensive Player of the Year honors while leading the Blue Dragons to the NJCAA DI Football Championship. He rushed for more than 1,600 yards and 20 touchdowns, averaging 134.5 yards per game.
Originally committed to UCF, Jordan continued the recent transfer portal and recruiting class momentum for Lincoln Riley when he flipped to the Trojans early this year.
Waymond’s really compact, really kind of moves effortlessly and obviously a ton of production at Hutch,” Riley said during Spring Practice.
Jordan brings much needed help to the USC backfield after losing All-Big Ten second team member Woody Marks – and his 1,133 yards and 9 touchdowns – to the NFL and second-leading rusher Quinten Joyner to Texas Tech via the transfer portal.
USC will kick off the 2025 season on Aug. 30 when they host Missouri State.
-
College Sports3 weeks ago
IU basketball recruiting
-
Social Media3 weeks ago
Pune Athletes Make Global Mark at IRONMAN Hamburg and Brazil 2025
-
Health3 weeks ago
Gymnast MyKayla Skinner Claims Simone Biles 'Belittled and Ostracized' Her amid Riley …
-
Motorsports3 weeks ago
NASCAR Race Today: Mexico City start times, schedule and how to watch live on TV
-
Motorsports3 weeks ago
NASCAR in Mexico City: Where to watch, start time, stream, lineup, race preview for inaugural Viva Mexico 250
-
College Sports7 days ago
WAC to Rebrand to UAC, Add Five New Members in 2026
-
College Sports3 weeks ago
Livvy Dunne honors boyfriend Paul Skenes with twist on LSU jersey
-
High School Sports3 weeks ago
New Bedford top stories
-
Health3 weeks ago
Chicago Sky receive unfortunate reaction to 'mental health' statement with Angel Reese
-
Health3 weeks ago
Kyrie Irving's Strong Message Amid Men's Mental Health Awareness Month