Connect with us

NIL

Xavier, UConn NCAA Tournament Snubs Create Confusion For Mid

Image credit: UConn coach Jim Penders (Getty Images) All the emotions you’d expect came rushing in at once—disappointment, anger, heartbreak for players who may never get another shot at the NCAA Tournament. Confusion. Sadness. There’s no consolation prize for Billy O’Conner. If one exists, he doesn’t want it. Instead, the eighth-year Xavier coach is searching […]

Published

on

Xavier, UConn NCAA Tournament Snubs Create Confusion For Mid


Image credit:

UConn coach Jim Penders (Getty Images)

All the emotions you’d expect came rushing in at once—disappointment, anger, heartbreak for players who may never get another shot at the NCAA Tournament. Confusion. Sadness.

There’s no consolation prize for Billy O’Conner. If one exists, he doesn’t want it.

Instead, the eighth-year Xavier coach is searching for answers from this year’s selection committee about what more his team could have done. The Musketeers produced the No. 33 overall strength of schedule, the No. 4 non-conference strength of schedule, and finished the season ranked No. 39 in RPI, the highest of any team left out of the field of 64.

O’Conner wants to understand the message not just from this year’s committee, but from the ones to come.

What more must his program, and mid-majors like it, do to avoid this kind of heartbreak again?

“Perfection is not attainable in this sport,” O’Conner told Baseball America just a few hours after the selection show. “So it’s like, I think that some of the frustration stems from like, ‘What is it?’ What goes into it? Because it feels like a moving target.”

The Musketeers had all the résumé markers typically associated with selection: 16 combined Quad I and II wins—more than Kentucky (12), which made the field comfortably, and Southeastern Louisiana (eight), which didn’t make the tournament but was still listed ahead of Xavier on the “First Four Out.” That inclusion was especially puzzling given Jay Artigues’ dual role as committee chair and Southeastern Louisiana’s athletic director.

Neither O’Conner nor UConn coach Jim Penders spent a second criticizing Southeastern or Kentucky or any other team that did or didn’t make it. Their argument wasn’t rooted in another program’s credentials. It was rooted in confusion over their own.

“Our season was not perfect this year, right?” O’Conner asked rhetorically. “We didn’t go 56-0. We didn’t win every game on our schedule. But I feel that we did what the committee has historically asked a program like ours to do to give themselves a chance to be in the mix for an at-large berth. And I think we did it fairly well.”

Penders echoed the sentiment.

“You look at the schedule that we play and we crisscross the country and try to build up the RPI as much as possible, knowing that we’re going to have some drags on it later on that are unavoidable,” Penders said. “I felt like we did all that we could do, and we were penalized.”

Kentucky Xavier Connecticut Southeastern Louisiana
RPI 38 39 41 54
SOS 8 33 80 130
Non-con SOS 191 4 48 251
Q1 record 8-19 5-12 7-11 0-3
Q2 record 4-1 11-12 5-4 8-3
Q3 record 7-3 5-2 9-6 18-8
Q4 record 10-1 11-1 17-0 11-2

Artigues, speaking on behalf of the committee, said Xavier and UConn were left out due to their conference schedules, which included just one Quadrant I series for Xavier and two for the Huskies. 

“If you look at UConn, the Big East after the top three, it doesn’t have another team in the top 100 (of RPI), and that kind of hurts them,” Artigues said. “UConn started out 13-7, then they won 25 of the last 29, but only seven of those games were against top 100 RPI teams… and UConn was 3-6 against the top teams in that conference.

“There was a lot of talk about Xavier, and they challenged themselves, and non-conference strength of schedule is very important. But you do have to win those games, some of those games at least. If you look at Xavier, in one trip they played, I think it was Tennessee, LSU, Southeastern Louisiana and Vanderbilt. They went 0-6 and they got outscored nine to 63 or 68, so it was really lopsided, not even competitive in that. So if you (have) the non-conference strength of schedule, which is really important, you do have to win some of them.”

Ask O’Conner, Penders or Big East assistant commissioner James Greene, though, and they’ll all tell you that Artigues’ argument falls flat.

And they’re right to question the logic. The conference schedule is unavoidable—a fixed set of matchups dictated by league membership, not by choice. That’s precisely why both UConn and Xavier scheduled so aggressively outside the league. 

They knew the Big East’s lower half would drag on their metrics come April. So they front-loaded their resumes with high-end opponents—SEC powers, ranked road trips, top-50 RPI matchups—to insulate themselves from the very argument the committee seemingly invoked to keep them out.

“I think it’s a little bit of a wake up call,” Greene said. “We all felt pretty good that had Creighton not wound up winning the tournament, and had Xavier or UConn done it, that Creighton would have been in that conversation. But based on the way the field came out, I’m not sure that would have been the case.”

That’s the part that stings: even doing things “the right way” wasn’t enough. Penders, in his 22nd season at UConn, built a schedule full of road gauntlets and resume-boosters from a one-off game against now-national No. 1-seed Vanderbilt (a contest the Huskies won) to a series against Miami. He just thought there’d be a reward for surviving it.

“Ultimately, I don’t want to just get into the tournament, I want to win a national championship,” Penders said. “So if I want to win a national championship, you kind of have to continue to schedule tough.”

O’Conner, whose team faced the fourth-hardest non-conference schedule in the nation by the metrics, also spoke to the value of intense match-making. 

“My goal as a coach is I want to put the opportunities in front of our players,” O’Conner said. “We got to go win games. We got to go beat Vanderbilt. We got to go beat Stanford. We got to go beat LSU or Tennessee or Oregon State or whoever it is. But those opportunities are there.”

Now, though, O’Conner and Penders are left to wonder if that method is actually worth it. It’s hard to know what matters, they said without knowledge of each other’s comments. RPI? Strength of schedule? Quad-I wins? Head-to-heads?

Xavier and UConn posted better RPIs than three at-large teams (Oklahoma State, USC and Arizona State). Xavier’s overall strength of schedule exceeded those of 31 teams that made the field, including five of the 16 hosts. Connecticut’s 7-11 Q-I record was better than fellow bubble teams. Xavier actually beat Kentucky head-to-head. 

“RPI matters until it doesn’t,” Greene said. “Where’s that line? From year to year, that line seems to switch or move.”

“It just felt like the committee was overlooking us,” he added. “That really sticks out to me.”

The Big East’s plight is one faced by every mid-major league in an increasingly top-heavy college baseball landscape that this year saw 30 of the 35 at-large bids go to teams from the SEC (12), ACC (eight), Big 12 (seven) and Big Ten (three). Independent Oregon State also locked up an at-large berth, leaving just four for mid-majors, including the Sun Belt, the fewest since the NCAA adopted the 64-team super regional format in 1999.

As such, it’s clearer than ever that programs like Xavier and UConn don’t have margin for error. And this year, the lesson they learned is even harsher: do everything right, and it still might not matter.

“If we are encouraging good teams to play good teams, that is great for the game of baseball,” O’Conner said. “If we are telling teams to just accumulate wins by any means necessary, that’s really bad for college baseball. That’s a bad product people are going to watch.”

Penders agreed, but highlighted the difficulties.

“Most of [the SEC teams] won’t play us,” he said. “They don’t want to play us and I don’t blame them. I mean, you don’t want to have a series loss to Connecticut on your resume. But what are we going to do? We got to keep marching on and try to find people that will play I think.”

That’s why this cuts so deeply. It’s not just about a tournament snub—it’s about how it feels to pour everything into the system and still walk away empty-handed and with far more questions than answers.

“There’s never going to be somebody that’s looking out for Xavier,” O’Conner said. “We’ve got to make it to a point where they can’t ignore us.”

Until then, he’ll keep scheduling the SEC powers. He’ll keep building the hardest possible non-conference gauntlets. He’ll keep believing that merit matters—even when the results suggest otherwise.

“We’re going to go down the same pathway again,” O’Conner said. “And we’ve got to get better. We’ve got to execute at a higher level. We’ve got to be ready for the challenges that are coming our way.”

Because there’s no other option. Not for Xavier, UConn or the rest of the mid-majors trying to do it the hard way and still hoping that it will be enough.

“It’s very difficult to look your guys in the eye and say, ‘We’re going to run through that brick wall, and then we’re going to do it again and again and again, and I promise you it’s going to work out,’” Penders said. “And then days like today make me feel a little bit like a liar.”

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

NIL

Greg Sankey answers when vote will happen on College Football Playoff expansion

SEC commissioner Greg Sankey gave a bit of a tease as to when the vote will happen for the College Football Playoff expansion. 14 and 16 team brackets are on the table for potential expansion, beginning as early as the 2026-27 season. How the model will look is anyone’s guess. Team selection process is paramount […]

Published

on


SEC commissioner Greg Sankey gave a bit of a tease as to when the vote will happen for the College Football Playoff expansion. 14 and 16 team brackets are on the table for potential expansion, beginning as early as the 2026-27 season.

How the model will look is anyone’s guess. Team selection process is paramount considering the 12-team bracket already changed the seeding for this coming season.

But Sankey reminded the good folks out there that the 12-team College Football Playoff is still in its evaluation period. If it’s any better this season, maybe it’ll give the committee and voters a better roadmap for expansion.

“The outer boundary is November 30, December 1 of this year for the ‘26 playoff,” Sankey said on The Dan Patrick Show. “Now keep in mind, when we went to 12 teams, the board said that’ll be the format for 2026, let’s start early if we can, which we obviously did, overall, in a successful way. But what was introduced immediately is, let’s go through these two years and conduct an evaluation. 

“So we’re in that evaluation standpoint. A lot of talk about, really 14 or 16. I think 12 is known as it’s kind of a foundation point, but the conversation is about 14 or 16, and then how our teams selected or placed into whatever size bracket exists is the more the headline question.” 

Sankey would just make it simple and go by the rankings, regardless of 12 teams or expansion. But with the amount of politicking going on, it might be hard to do so right now until there is a clear and concise selection formula.

“Well, I’ve been one who said over time, I give no allocation,” Sankey said. “So this whole five- seven thing that exists now, I just make it the 12 best teams. And I was clear on that. Now, when we get into rooms, we make political compromises, if you will, small p not like Congress, political compromises, but to achieve an outcome … We’ve spent so much time expanding and working through our own little side arguments about teams and, oh, we can’t do this. We need this. You got to protect this bowl game or that bowl game. 

“We never went back to the essence of decision making, which is how our team selected as everyone relocated over the last four or five years, do the analyzes that existed and work for the four-team playoff in 2014, still have the same relevance, and we’re behind that curve in my opinion.”



Link

Continue Reading

NIL

The Players Era Festival Could be a Game-Changer for Gonzaga

While other top programs have spent the offseason treating the transfer portal like an all-inclusive buffet, the Zags have, as always, remained deliberate. So far, just two portal additions—Adam Miller from Arizona State and Tyon Grant-Foster from Grand Canyon—plus one high school commit, Parker Jefferson. And though it’s not yet official, Mario Saint-Supery appears all […]

Published

on


While other top programs have spent the offseason treating the transfer portal like an all-inclusive buffet, the Zags have, as always, remained deliberate. So far, just two portal additions—Adam Miller from Arizona State and Tyon Grant-Foster from Grand Canyon—plus one high school commit, Parker Jefferson. And though it’s not yet official, Mario Saint-Supery appears all but locked in. While other schools have committed to full NIL-fueled rebuilds, the Zags have been a little more intentional than most.

With the Zags, fit always matters more than pedigree, and the program’s adherence to this philosophy is what’s allowed Gonzaga to stay competitive despite being a fraction of the size of just about every other top 25 program.

The Zags have always operated at an NIL disadvantage, but this November, the team will participate in something entirely new to the basketball world. The Players Era Festival is more than another early-season multi-team event like Maui or the Battle 4 Atlantis. It marks an unprecedented structural shift in how programs like Gonzaga can leverage visibility and NIL support without needing a Power Five bankroll to do it.

What Is the Players Era Festival?

The Players Era Festival is a tournament and NIL event held in Las Vegas during Thanksgiving week. It’s built to give college players meaningful NIL opportunities while generating significant college basketball hype early in the season, meaning fans can watch some high-level tournament-style basketball months before March Madness.

Launched in 2024 with eight teams and $9 million in distributed NIL money, the Players Era Festival returns in 2025 with an expanded format and a wider reach. Both the men’s and women’s tournaments will be held in Vegas, with combined NIL payouts expected to exceed $24 million. The men’s side will host 18 programs, including Alabama, Kansas, Baylor, Houston, Michigan, Auburn, and Gonzaga. For the first time, fans will get to see a big field of the best schools in the country in November, and players will have real financial gains at stake in their tournament performance.

If the Festival goes according to plan, non-conference scheduling priorities for smaller schools like Gonzaga could shift dramatically in the coming years.

The event pairs group-stage competition with bracketed play, and all participating teams receive guaranteed NIL compensation for their players, facilitated by the Festival’s partnership with TheLinkU. The model is something brand new in college basketball. NIL dollars in this case aren’t tethered to a school’s alumni base or booster culture but are instead based on team performance. Last year’s tournament winner, the Oregon Ducks, were able to leave Vegas $1.5 million richer in NIL opportunities, and this year’s will leave with significantly more than that.

This is a critical development for schools like Gonzaga. With a total undergraduate enrollment of under 6,000 and a local market that, while passionate, lacks the economic scale of major metro areas, Gonzaga operates without many of the baked-in NIL advantages enjoyed by other top-25 programs. (Of the other 24 teams on ESPN’s preseason top 25, no team has a smaller enrollment. Duke comes in slightly larger by undergrad population, and after that comes Saint John’s, which boasts an enrollment of nearly 16,000 undergrads.) The Festival offers a rare chance to compete on a highly visible national stage early in the season and with a financial floor already in place—no donor blitz or marketing scramble required. Most importantly, no waiting around for the Big Dance for Gonzaga’s players to receive the media attention typically reserved only for the end of the season.

A Hard Truth

Some fans may bristle at the idea that Gonzaga’s NIL situation could be—or has already been—a limiting factor in its recruiting pitch. But any time a school as small as Gonzaga is competing for recruits with the likes of USC (20,000+ undergrads), Kentucky (roughly 24,000), or Texas (over 40,000), the reality of a school’s alumni network and donor base needs to be faced.

By way of painful reminder: Nik Khamenia (Duke), Kingston Flemmings (Houston), and Zoom Diallo (Washington) were all high school targets the Zags pursued aggressively and missed out on. From the transfer portal, GU was reportedly in the mix for—but also missed out on—Malik Thomas (to Virginia), Donovan Dent (to UCLA), Rodney Rice (to USC), Sam Lewis (to Virginia), Andrej Stojakovic (to Illinois), Tyson Eaglestaff (to West Virginia), Silas Demary Jr. (to UConn), Brendan Hausen (to Iowa), and Jordan Ross (to Georgia). All of whom committed elsewhere, to much larger schools, with presumably more NIL money and opportunity than what was available at Gonzaga.

This obviously doesn’t mean that NIL was the biggest factor in the recruitment for these dudes, or even the decisive one, but if the portal has shown us anything in the last few years, it’s that for many, many players, money talks. Loudly.

The Equalizer

That’s what makes the Players Era Festival such a landmark opportunity for the Zags. It’s not about free money; it’s about access to opportunity tied to actual performance. For schools without the massive coffers or big-time corporate sponsors lining up at the door, it creates a foothold—a chance to let basketball speak for itself and weld performance to tangible financial benefits.

The Roster That Fits

For a team like Gonzaga, visibility can be hard to come by in the early part of the season, and although Mark Few always slates a brutal non-conference tilt for his team, by January, much of the national media attention understandably shifts toward the Power Five schools and Blue Bloods. An 81–50 blowout over Portland is a hoot to tune in for if you’re a Zag fan, but it’s not exactly “Must-See TV” for the rest of the college basketball viewing world. The massive media market available to schools in the SEC, for example, is simply not something the Zags have ever been able to compete with, and the Players Era Tournament levels that playing early on and in a highly competitive field, if even just a little bit.

For the first time ever, Gonzaga has an NIL event tailored to reward their winning edge despite the school’s size and scale. Rolling into Vegas and winning the Players Era Festival against schools who have spent this portal cycle doing Scrooge McDuck backstrokes through their endless piles of NIL cash would be just about the most Mark Few thing of the NIL era.

Still Gonzaga

That’s precisely what’s made the last 25 years of Bulldog basketball one of the most compelling stories in all of sports. The fact that a school this size has been able to sustain this level of success in this changing financial landscape is, frankly, astonishing. The Players Era Festival offers another opportunity to prove to recruits that Big Money does not equal Big Wins while still directing some of that Big Money right into the pockets of its players.

Gonzaga’s alumni network and available local business partnerships may be dwarfed by those of other schools; no other program in the country also has two former players—Chet Holmgren (OKC) and Andrew Nembhard (Indiana)—playing starting minutes in this year’s NBA Finals. No massive media market. No pay-for-play cloak-and-dagger “brand partnerships.” Just structure, development, and results. The only other school with players on both NBA Finals rosters is Kentucky—a university that graduates about as many students each year as Gonzaga even enrolls. That comparison says a lot about just how far above its weight class Gonzaga has been punching.

This year’s Players Era Festival won’t crown a new national champion (Oregon somehow beat Alabama in last year’s championship matchup, after all), but it could very well help reshape the perception of what schools like Gonzaga can offer their players in 2025 and beyond. The Zags will never have the booster network and alumni base of Texas, Michigan, or Florida. That’s just a simple fact. Never. But year after year, the Zags have still found a way to stay competitive.

What the Players Era Festival offers is a rare opportunity to showcase that competitive edge while connecting dudes with legit financial opportunities. It’s an NIL move that still lets the basketball speak for itself.



Link

Continue Reading

NIL

How Texas Tech’s Million-Dollar Transfer Changes NIL Landscape | Will Compton on Barstool Exit and New Show

Behind the pitching of its $1 million transfer NiJaree Canady, Texas Tech softball ended the powerhouse Oklahoma Sooners’ season Monday night. FOS reporter Amanda Christovich joins Baker Machado and Renee Washington on FOS Today to explain the NIL arms race and how the House v. NCAA settlement could throw a wrench in it.   Plus, […]

Published

on


Behind the pitching of its $1 million transfer NiJaree Canady, Texas Tech softball ended the powerhouse Oklahoma Sooners’ season Monday night. FOS reporter Amanda Christovich joins Baker Machado and Renee Washington on FOS Today to explain the NIL arms race and how the House v. NCAA settlement could throw a wrench in it.

 

Plus, Bussin’ With the Boys co-creator and host Will Compton explains his decision to leave Barstool for FanDuel, why it makes sense for some NFL players to retire early, and how his new podcast For the Dads came to life.

 

FOST also examines the importance of baseball managers and roasts the Orlando Magic’s new logo.





Link

Continue Reading

NIL

How Texas Tech’s Million-Dollar Transfer Changes NIL Landscape | Will Compton on Barstool Exit and New Show

How Texas Tech’s Million-Dollar Transfer Changes NIL Landscape | Will Compton on Barstool Exit and New Show – Front Office Sports […]

Published

on






How Texas Tech’s Million-Dollar Transfer Changes NIL Landscape | Will Compton on Barstool Exit and New Show – Front Office Sports
















































































Link

Continue Reading

NIL

Million Dollar Pitching Star Makes National Impact During Texas Tech Historical Posts

The Red Raiders are making history in their debut trip to Oklahoma City for Women’s College World Series (WCWS) and NiJaree Canady is a big part of this historic run.  Texas Tech is headed to the national championship series and this is the first time in WCWS history that a program has made it this […]

Published

on


The Red Raiders are making history in their debut trip to Oklahoma City for Women’s College World Series (WCWS) and NiJaree Canady is a big part of this historic run. 

Texas Tech is headed to the national championship series and this is the first time in WCWS history that a program has made it this far in their debut trip to OKC since the Oklahoma Sooners did it in 2000 per Brad Crawford with CBS Sports.

The team that the Red Raiders just beat to advance: the Oklahoma Sooners. The Raiders were also on a 37-game losing streak to the Sooners prior to their game Monday. They punched their ticket to the title game with a 3-2 win. By the time Canady left the pitching circle the Sooners had only five total hits.

The second Canady hit the transfer portal Texas Tech made her their main priority. She started her collegiate career with the Stanford Cardinals and she decided to pursue other programs for the rest of her career.

Texas Tech’s NIL Collective, offered her a one-year $1,050,24 contract just three days after she had entered the portal stated by Canady in an interview with Dave Wilson on ESPN. Canady also made it clear in her interview that if she didn’t believe in the program she wouldn’t have moved to Lubbock.

“I feel like people thought I heard the number and just came to Texas Tech, which wasn’t the case at all,” said Canady and she also mentioned that she took over a month to think the contract over.

Canady went into a program that had only won 31% of its conference games since the start of Big12 Conference. By the end of league play this season they were the conference champions for the first time in program history.

Canady is the USA Softball Collegiate Player of the Year for many reasons. With the Red Raiders she has a 30-5 record and an incredibly low 0.89 ERA as stated on the Red Raiders’ website.

Her list of accolades are lengthy including: NFCA First Team All-American (2024), PAC 12 Pitcher of the Year (2024), Women’s College World Series All-Tournament Team (2023,2024) among many, many other awards. 

While there is a lot of controversy surrounding NIL contracts Canady has showed that there are positives to letting players make money off their names as she put Texas Tech Softball on the map this year. Even if they do not win the title this year this has ultimately changed the program for the better.



Link

Continue Reading

NIL

Ex-California high school football player suing to overturn state’s NIL rules

Every paradigm-shifting change to college athletics in the past decade-plus has started in California.  The landmark O’Bannon v NCAA lawsuit, filed in 2009 by former UCLA basketball player Ed O’Bannon, was heard in the summer of 2014 by the US District Court in Northern California. The first state law allowing college athletes to profit off their […]

Published

on


Every paradigm-shifting change to college athletics in the past decade-plus has started in California. 

The landmark O’Bannon v NCAA lawsuit, filed in 2009 by former UCLA basketball player Ed O’Bannon, was heard in the summer of 2014 by the US District Court in Northern California. The first state law allowing college athletes to profit off their name, image and likeness was signed in 2019 by California governor Gavin Newsom. The ongoing House v NCAA lawsuit, whose settlement is expected any day now and will allow schools to share revenue directly with athletes, is being ruled upon by the same judge and the same court as O’Bannon.

Now, a new lawsuit, filed in California, is attempting to do for high school sports what the above lawsuits and bills did for college athletics. 

As reported by Front Office Sportsformer California high school athlete Dominik Calhoun has filed a class-action lawsuit against the California Interscholastic Federation, arguing the organization’s rules around NIL are a violation of antitrust law.

Crucially, California is one of the states that already allows its high school athletes to participate in the NIL market. In 2022, Bronny James and JuJu Watkins — classmates at Sierra Canyon High School at the time — signed publicity deals with Nike. However, CIF rules forbid high schools from sharing revenue directly with athletes (as will happen in the NCAA soon, brought forth by House) and also prevents booster clubs from forming collectives to recruit and retain athletes, as happens currently in college athletics.

“Collectively, these rules and regulations forbid CIF member schools or CIF Sections from sharing the revenue they receive by licensing their student-athletes’ NIL with those very student-athletes, artificially fixing the price student-athletes are compensated for their NIL at zero,” the complaint read.

Calhoun played football and ran track at Pittsburg High School, near Oakland. A 3-star recruit, he is now preparing to begin his freshman season as a defensive back at Boise State. 

But, Calhoun’s complaint argues, CIF rules illegally barred him from participating in the economic value that his efforts generated for Pittsburg High School and the CIF. 

 “This case challenges rules that unfairly prevent high school athletes in California from being compensated for their hard work and the use of their name, image, and likeness—even as others profit from them,” Yaman Salahi, co-lead attorney representing Calhoun, told FOS. “It’s the logical next step after the reforms inaugurated by successful antitrust litigation on the collegiate level. Corporations see a lot of untapped economic value in high school athletics, and we want to ensure that value is shared equitably with the athletes that create it.” 

Of course, suing to change rules in college athletics was worthwhile because there was a verifiable pot of gold on the other end of the rainbow. College athletics is a multi-billion dollar business. High school athletics is…well, I personally don’t know what it is. Most every high school program fundraises because the budget provided by the school would not make ends meet. The vast, vast majority of high school athletes have zero market for their services, either on the open NIL market or via collectives. The vast majority of principals would probably tell you over a frosty beverage they’d sooner stop sponsoring athletics than cut checks to their athletes as pseudo-employees. 

And yet, many of the same statements could have been said about college athletics in recent years, and within a month’s time dozens of schools who do not turn a profit on paper will cut checks to athletes whom the vast majority of their own fans could not identify out of uniform. 

So, I do not know where Calhoun’s lawsuit will go, if it goes anywhere at all. But I do know that if, five years from now, the national economic landscape of high school athletics is irrevocably changed, history tells us that change will have started in California. 



Link

Continue Reading

Most Viewed Posts

Trending