Thanks to all 117 people who responded to Die By The Blade’s annual voting for the Buffalo Sabres’ Top 25 Under 25 list. Before we get into the list, let’s take a moment for the honorable mentions – AKA, the players who didn’t make the top 25.

There were 49 eligible players this year. Several players on last year’s top 25 list aged out (Rasmus Dahlin & Mattias Samuelsson among them) while others are no longer with the organization (such as JJ Peterka & Dylan Cozens).

Let’s kick things off with a few players who just missed the cut for making the top 25.

Jake Richard (RW/LW)

The 20-year-old Richard was drafted 170th overall by the Sabres in 2022. He just completed his second season of NCAA Division I hockey at Connecticut and really had a breakthrough year. With 43 points in 34 games, he more than doubled his point production across the board. Of his 15 goals, seven came on the power play. He was also named a Hockey East Third Team All-Star.

Richard will return to UConn this fall for his junior year.

David Bedkowski (D)

Bedkowski, 18, was just drafted by the Sabres with the 71st overall pick earlier this year. A right-shot defender from Toronto, Bedkowski is known for his physicality. In 35 games with the OHL’s Owen Sound Attack this past season, he notched 73 penalty minutes. Here’s what EliteProspects has to say:

“To say he has a “mean streak” would be an understatement. Bedkowski punishes. He hurts, retaliates, beats down, knocks, and crushes opponents with open-ice hits and bone-rattling contact along the boards. Bedkowski flashes confidence in the attacking zone, too. He joins the rush, one-touches passes, beats forecheckers with his feet, and occasionally unloads one-timers from the blue line.”

Gavin McCarthy (D)

McCarthy, 20, is a Clarence native drafted by the Sabres in 2023 (86th overall). In his sophomore season at Boston University, he registered 16 points – 13 assists – and had 51 penalty minutes in 39 games. Prior to his being drafted, EliteProspects called him “part-robust defender, part-clever creator” who “throws crushing hits, wins inside positioning and eliminates off-puck threats.”

Check out this article from Buffalo Hockey Beat about McCarthy from last month.

Luke Osburn (D)

Osburn, 18, was drafted by the Sabres 108th overall last year. He spent this past season with the USHL’s Youngstown Phantoms, where he nearly doubled his point production from his rookie year. He put up 10 goals and 31 assists for 41 points in 55 games, compared to 23 poiints in 60 games the prior season. He was also named USHL Defenseman of the Year.

DobblerProspects calls him “a fluid, composed, highly intelligent defenseman with a great aptitude for making things happen in motion.“

Osburn is set to join the University of Wisconsin this fall.

Matteo Costantini

Costantini, 22, recently signed a two-year AHL contract with the Rochester Americans and is set to make his pro debut this fall. He’s coming off a championship season with Western Michigan, where he served as an alternate captain. He recorded 23 points, including 15 goals, in 40 games. Costantini previously spent two seasons at North Dakota before finishing his collegiate career with two seasons with the Broncos.

The Sabres still hold Costantini’s NHL rights but have until August 15, 2025 to sign him.

Sometimes, the key to interpreting the law lies not in what it says—but in what it leaves unsaid.

In the summer of 2021, shortly after the NCAA adopted its interim name, image, and likeness (NIL) policy, Benjamin Snyder, a North Carolina-based immigration lawyer, received a call from a friend—an agent representing several college basketball coaches. The agent had a pressing question: How could his coaching clients include international athletes in the evolving NIL landscape?

At the time, the prevailing belief was that international athletes—most of whom held F-1 student visas—were categorically excluded. U.S. immigration law largely prohibits F-1 visa holders from engaging in employment involving the performance of labor or services, and many assumed NIL deals with third parties fell squarely into that category. After all, the distinction between NIL and impermissible pay-for-play was supposed to hinge on what the athletes were doing to earn the money.

The conventional wisdom, then, held that international athletes could only participate in NIL activities while physically outside the United States.

But Snyder read the situation differently. After examining the legal landscape, he concluded that many NIL deals qualified as passive income rather than active employment—income that F-1 visa holders are not explicitly barred from receiving. Based on this interpretation, Snyder argued that international athletes could legally accept third-party NIL payments even while residing in the U.S.

That analysis proved to be welcome news to college coaches, especially in sports like basketball, who were eager to recruit international talent that might otherwise have turned professional overseas.

Snyder has since emerged a central figure in efforts to help Power 4 schools include international athletes in the revenue-sharing plans outlined in the House v. NCAA settlement. He says he has advised roughly a dozen institutions across the Big Ten, ACC and Big 12, offering guidance on how to structure contracts and ensure compliance with immigration law. 

One key consideration: If revenue-sharing payments from schools to athletes are to be classified as passive income for immigration purposes, then recipients must properly withhold taxes in accordance with that classification.

Still, the first—and often most difficult—step is convincing campus international student services offices, which function as frontline immigration enforcers. But to date, he’s had nobody reject his guidance.

Immigration law, broadly speaking, is a complex and often contentious area of American jurisprudence. Snyder concedes that, in the absence of clear case law or administrative guidance, practitioners are largely navigating in the dark. Even so, he maintains that his legal theory would stand up well in court. In formulating his position, Snyder analyzed distinctions in the U.S. tax code between active earned income and passive royalty income—the latter being exempt from self-employment tax.

A critical precedent came from the 1983 Kramer v. Commissioner case, which explored whether royalty income qualified as earned income under the minimum tax rules. The Tax Court found that 70% of former tennis pro Jack Kramer’s endorsement deal with Wilson, based on royalties from racquets and merchandise bearing his name, constituted royalties tied to commercial use of his NIL. The remaining 30% was deemed compensation for personal services.

“That helps us demarcate where passive income ends and employment begins,” Snyder explained. “It’s in the performance of some activity, including activity to promote the product or the merchandise they are selling.”

Some leagues seem to be incorporating Snyder’s view into policies, at least passively. While the Big Ten Conference has taken no official stance on whether F-1 visa holders may receive House payments, it deliberately structured its template revenue-sharing agreement as a passive license, in part to accommodate international athletes.

However, not everyone is buying Snyder’s argument.

Ksenia Maiorova, a Florida-based lawyer who specializes in advising international college athletes, dismissed Snyder’s position as a “legal fiction.”

“I like Ben, he is a really nice guy, but I vehemently disagree with him on this legal position,” Maiorova said. “I believe it is form over substance.”

For Maiorova, the heart of the issue lies in the visa approval process itself—controlled by individual consular officers who wield broad discretion. And under the Trump administration’s heightened scrutiny, that discretion can become a serious obstacle.

Her concerns are shaped in part by conversations with former consular officers like Chris Richardson, who previously served as a visa chief for the State Department and conducted tens of thousands of visa application interviews. Richardson told Sportico that if he were assessing a prospective international college athlete with a revenue-sharing deal, he would have “a lot of concerns.”

“Most of these deals are being structured as passive income, and maybe that will work for some officers, but it doesn’t seem to pass the smell test,” said Richardson, now president and general counsel of immigration consultancy BDV Solutions. “You are literally doing the most active physical labor possible, and you are being paid for it.”

At the same time, Richardson acknowledged that immigration law often lags behind real-world developments. Some consular officers, he noted, may try to account for that.

So, would he approve an F-1 visa application involving athlete revenue-sharing?

“I would probably say yes,” Richardson admitted. “I would probably try to look at it as passive as possible. But for all officers, it is a bit of a stretch.”

Too much of a stretch, in Maiorova’s view.

Still, she concedes that her warnings are “not being heeded.” That was made clear at last month’s annual convention of the National Association of College Directors of Athletics (NACDA), where F-1 visas and revenue-sharing payments were a major topic of conversation.

“Institutions have come to believe—and I don’t think unreasonably—that NIL enforcement by the NCAA has no teeth,” she said.  “Schools have gotten away with doing things the NCAA has specifically prohibited … and there has been little practical recourse.”

In this case, though, the enforcer isn’t the NCAA, or even the newly formed College Sports Commission. It’s U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE).

One Power Four school’s athletics compliance official, speaking anonymously, voiced fears that the issue could become a flashpoint in the broader immigration debate. He said his department has even conjured the possibility of ICE agents pulling an athlete off the court during a televised game.

In the early months of his second term, President Donald Trump has repeatedly attacked higher education, most notably through his administration’s legal battles with Harvard.

Yet, as Richardson pointed out, many of the universities now preparing to distribute House payments to F-1 athletes are public institutions in Trump-supporting states, complicating the politics of enforcement.

Snyder, for his part, remains confident in his legal reasoning but recognizes the inherent unpredictability of the system.

“I want to make clear that this analysis and application of law is rock solid,” he said. “But generally speaking, there is so much in the world of immigration that is subject to executive branch discretion and varying interpretation.”

With the current visa application cycle—typically starting in May—already underway, Snyder said that none of the F-1 applicants at his client schools have been denied. Several international athletes, he added, are already on campus.

Both Maiorova and Richardson believe the more secure path for athletes seeking revenue-sharing deals would be to apply for P-1A work visas, which are designed for “internationally recognized athletes.” The problem? That process is far more burdensome and not intended for students whose primary purpose is academic.

Maiorova is currently co-representing LSU women’s basketball player Last-Tear Poa, an Australian national, in a lawsuit against U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) over its denial of her P-1 visa application. A federal judge is currently considering both sides’ motions for summary judgment.

Snyder noted that he, too, has represented elite international athletes whose P-1 applications were rejected.

Under the P-1A visa, professional athletes may enter the U.S. to compete in a specific event and participate in related promotional activities. That’s why foreign NBA players, for instance, can legally appear in commercials. But in the context of college athletics, Snyder said, U.S. immigration officials tend to view such promotional efforts as beyond the scope of competition—as “extra-extra-curricular activities,” in his words.

“We feel our position is very consistent with the very little bit we know about how USCIS thinks about this so far,” Snyder said. “But it’s still a very new and emerging area.”

UMass Boston has announced the appointment of Beacons alum David Lun as the next head coach of the women’s hockey team.

Lun returns to the harbor campus after serving as the head coach of the women’s hockey team at Salve Regina since Aug. 2020. Under his leadership, the Seahawks posted their first winning season since 2014–15.

“We are thrilled to welcome David back to Beaconville,” said UMass Boston vice chancellor and director of athletics and recreation Dr. Jacqueline Schuman in a news release. “As both an alumnus and former student-athlete, he brings a deep understanding of our values and a clear vision for the future of our women’s hockey program. His track record of success, deep care and intentionality towards the development of student-athletes, team culture and community through sports, and drive towards championship level competitive excellence make him a tremendous addition to our department.”

“It’s an incredible honor to return to UMass Boston and lead this program,” Lun added. “This institution shaped me as a student and an athlete, and I’m excited to give back by helping these young women grow both on and off the ice. I look forward to building something special with this team.”

In his final season at Salve Regina, Lun guided the team to a 17–10–0 overall record and an impressive 14–4–0 mark in NEHC play, advancing to the conference semifinals. The team made major strides at both ends of the ice, improving its scoring average from 1.9 to 2.19 goals per game while reducing its goals-against average from 3.1 to just 1.6 during the 2024–25 season. For his efforts, Lun was named the NEHC coach of the year.

Prior to his time at Salve Regina, Lun spent three seasons as an assistant coach at Wesleyan, where he helped lead the Cardinals to their first-ever NESCAC tournament championship and NCAA tournament appearance in 2019–20.

In 2016, Lun served as the head coach and general manager of the FHL’s Danbury Titans. In that role, he oversaw prospect recruitment, roster management, trades, contract negotiations, and immigration filings for international players. Under his leadership, the Titans posted a 26-22-7-1 record, a plus-24 goal differential, and qualified for postseason play.

A native of Grand Rapids, Mich., Lun graduated from UMass Boston in May 2011 with a bachelor of science in exercise science. A four-year standout forward for the Beacons under current head coach Peter Belisle, Lun was known for his leadership and consistent production.

Following graduation, he played professionally in the FHL. In 2011–12, he posted 14 goals and 28 assists (42 points) with the Cape Cod Bluefins. He followed that up with a 10-26-36 season for the Danville Dashers in 2012–13 before serving as a two-time captain for the Danbury Whalers from 2013 to 2015. During the 2013–14 season, he notched 41 points.

Lun also holds a master’s degree in liberal studies with a concentration in social sciences from Wesleyan.

He will officially begin his role at UMass Boston on Aug. 25.