Motorsports
'Absolute nonsense' F1 rule change idea blasted by former team boss


“For me, when you finish second, in some cases it’s real joy if you’ve never done it before or haven’t done it on a regular basis, but, in real terms, you’re the first of the losers.Awarding points to every position would have an effect on FIA finances, too, as drivers must hand out money for their annual Super Licence fees – this cost of entry fee is determined by how many points a driver has scored during the previous season.
David Coulthard: It’s just a case of spreading finances
Podcast co-host Eddie Jordan, former team boss of Jordan GP, would have been a beneficiary of such a system during his time in the sport, given how Jordan was usually a midfield operation.
Until 2002, the points system only awarded points to the top six finishers, extending to the top eight in 2003. These were the systems David Coulthard raced with during his F1 career, with the Scottish driver dismissing the idea of extending the points system further beyond the top 10.
With the field set to expand in F1 2026 with Cadillac’s arrival, the idea of more than half the grid going home empty-handed from a race may cause the issue to be revisited this year.
Read Next: Racing Bulls ‘know how others collaborate’ in stern B-team criticism response
“There’s the winner, and then second is the first of the losers, and then it’s the second of the losers and the third of the losers… that’s how I see it.
Jordan pointed to an example of how one of his drivers had been extra motivated to succeed given the small window for success open to him, which likely wouldn’t have motivated him as much had points been available further down the field.
👉 Explained: What is ‘parc fermé’ and how does the FIA enforce it?
“We absolutely 100 per cent agree on this,” he said.
“[I said to him] ‘If you don’t score points today – and that was top six – you are history, you are adios, you’re down the road and you are sacked’.
👉 FIA explained: What does it stand for and how does it govern F1?
Where such a system would have a benefit would be in ensuring every position is as hard-fought as possible, with lower-scoring teams sometimes only separated in the championship by a driver managing to secure a higher non-scoring points place.
More on Formula 1’s rules and regulations
“I absolutely am against points to 10th place.”
“Who remembers who finished fourth? You might remember who finished second and third.
Last year, an idea was put forward to extend the points scoring beyond the top 10 to include a further two positions eligible for scoring, but the proposal was shot down in a unanimous vote by the F1 Commission.
“When you’re competing in life, and competing in every different aspect, there is a compulsion amongst us – and that competitive urge is to win.
“So I’m saying the aspirations and the drive, or the commitment to finishing the top six is so important. I’m absolutely against this jiggling around with absolute nonsense and points, for Christ’s sake, down to 12th place – they’ll soon give points to everyone on the grid. It’s just a nonsense.”
“Jesus, top 10 in anything – it’s not really anything to shout about, is it?”
“So I think it’s just a case of spreading the financial love, because we’re looking at giving credit to anyone outside the top 10.
“It was what it was, and today it is what it is, and you can keep changing things and it doesn’t fundamentally change. The most important thing is the winner.
A proposal to tweak the F1 points scoring system for 2025 was ruled out by the F1 Commission in July, with the idea criticised by former team boss Eddie Jordan.
“And what happened? He finished sixth. Would he have finished sixth if there were points to the top 10? I don’t think so.
“As long as you don’t let it overrule your entire body and your whole meaning for life and you take it as it is, then winning is so important.
“Back in my day, you only got points for the top six,” he said on the Formula For Success podcast.
“I remember when [Ralf Schumacher] finished sixth in a Jordan car,” he said.
His team may have scored plenty more points and secured occasionally higher championship positions had F1 awarded points outside the top six – the points system in place for all but three of Jordan’s seasons as a team – but the Irishman was equally as dismissive of the idea of further points spread.
The idea of extending the points system hasn’t disappeared entirely though, with one informal suggestion that was bandied about being to make every position a points-scoring one.
Motorsports
NASCAR Antitrust Lawsuit: “Like a Gun to Your Head,” Team Owner Testifies in Court
A major antitrust trial against NASCAR revealed tense internal negotiations. The federal case in Charlotte features emotional testimony from team owners. Key plaintiffs are 23XI Racing and Front Row Motorsports.The heart of the dispute is NASCAR’s charter system. Teams claim the sanctioning body used unfair tactics to force a new deal.
Heather Gibbs Details “Devastating” Six-Hour Ultimatum
Heather Gibbs of Joe Gibbs Racing testified on Friday. She described being given a 112-page charter extension to sign. The deadline was just six hours on a September evening in 2024.She called the document something you would never sign in business. Gibbs said it felt like having a gun to your head. According to her testimony, the choice was sign or lose everything.Charters guarantee a spot in every Cup Series race. They also provide a defined share of revenue. The system was created back in 2016.Teams had asked for charters to be made permanent. This would provide long-term financial stability. NASCAR’s final offer refused this key demand.Only two teams refused to sign the last-minute extension. They are the plaintiffs in this lawsuit. All other charter holders signed under pressure.


Michael Jordan Takes the Stand in Packed Courtroom
NBA legend and 23XI co-owner Michael Jordan also testified. The courtroom was notably packed for his appearance. His team alleges monopolistic behavior by NASCAR.Joe Gibbs Racing employs 450 people. The team relies entirely on sponsorship money. Gibbs testified that permanent charters are vital for protecting their investment.She spoke about the team’s legacy and family history. Both of Joe Gibbs’ sons have passed away. Protecting the organization’s future is a central concern.According to testimony, Joe Gibbs called NASCAR Chairman Jim France. He pleaded for a different resolution to the standoff. France reportedly ended the conversation abruptly.The outcome of this trial could reshape NASCAR’s business model. It questions the balance of power between the series and its teams. A verdict is expected in the coming weeks.
Toronto Godspell Launched Comedy Legends, New Documentary Reveals
The NASCAR antitrust lawsuit highlights a deep rift over the sport’s financial future. The plaintiffs seek a ruling that could redefine team rights permanently.
Info at your fingertips
Q1: What is a NASCAR charter?
A charter is like a franchise in other sports. It guarantees a team a starting spot in every race. It also provides a defined share of series revenue.
Q2: Who is suing NASCAR?
The plaintiffs are 23XI Racing, co-owned by Michael Jordan, and Front Row Motorsports. They filed a federal antitrust lawsuit. They claim NASCAR operates as a monopoly.
Q3: What was the “gun to the head” comment about?
Heather Gibbs used the phrase to describe NASCAR’s negotiation tactic. Teams were given a six-hour deadline to sign a complex extension. Refusing meant potentially losing their charter.
Q4: What do the teams want from this lawsuit?
The teams want the court to rule NASCAR’s practices are anti-competitive. They seek changes to the charter system. A core demand is making charters permanent assets.
iNews covers the latest and most impactful stories across
entertainment,
business,
sports,
politics, and
technology,
from AI breakthroughs to major global developments. Stay updated with the trends shaping our world. For news tips, editorial feedback, or professional inquiries, please email us at
[email protected].
Get the latest news and Breaking News first by following us on
Google News,
Twitter,
Facebook,
Telegram
, and subscribe to our
YouTube channel.
Motorsports
Former NASCAR driver Michael Annett dies at 39
Former NASCAR driver Michael Annett has died. He was 39.
JR Motorsports announced Annett’s death in a social media post Friday evening with no other details. Annett drove for the team in the Xfinity Series for five seasons from 2017-21.
Annett made over 100 starts in NASCAR’s Cup Series and over 300 starts in NASCAR’s second-tier Xfinity Series. Annett’s lone Xfinity Series win came in 2019, when he won the season-opening race at Daytona. He went on to have five more top-five finishes and finished ninth in the points standings that season.
Advertisement
His best season in the Xfinity Series came in 2012 when he drove for Richard Petty Motorsports. Annett had six top-five finishes and 17 top-10 finishes and finished fifth in the points standings.
At JR Motorsports, he never finished outside the top 15 in the points standings.
Annett competed in 106 Cup Series races over the 2014, 2015 and 2016 seasons. He drove for underfunded teams Tommy Baldwin Racing and HScott Racing during his time at NASCAR’s top level and had just six top-20 finishes in his Cup Series career. His best finish came in 2015 when he was 13th at the Daytona 500.
Annett retired after the 2021 season after he dealt with a stress fracture in his right leg for much of the season. He missed seven races that year. He also missed races during the 2013 season after he suffered a fractured and dislocated sternum in a crash at Daytona when his car slammed head-on into the wall.
Motorsports
Michael Annett, former NASCAR driver, dies at 39
FILE – Michael Annett, driver of the #1 Pilot Flying J Chevrolet, waits on the grid prior to the NASCAR Xfinity Series Kansas Lottery 300 at Kansas Speedway on October 23, 2021 in Kansas City, Kansas. (Photo by Sean Gardner/Getty Images)
Michael Annett, a former NASCAR driver and winner in the Xfinity Series, has died at 39.
JR Motorsports, a team Annett drove for, confirmed his death Friday in a social media post.
Michael Annett cause of death
What we know:
Annett’s death was announced Friday, but no details have been released. Annett was a native of Des Moines, Iowa.
What we don’t know:
It’s unclear when and how he died, though former NASCAR driver Brad Keselowski said he’s “glad he is no longer suffering.”
What they’re saying:
“NASCAR is deeply saddened to learn of the passing of former NASCAR driver Michael Annett,” NASCAR said in a statement. “Michael was a respected competitor whose determination, professionalism, and positive spirit were felt by everyone in the garage. Throughout his career, he represented our sport with integrity and the passion of a true racer. NASCAR extends its condolences to Michael’s family and many friends.”
“Our thoughts and prayers are with the entire Annett family with the passing of our friend Michael Annett,” JR Motorsports shared on social media via X. “Michael was a key member of JRM from 2017 until he retired in 2021 and was an important part in turning us into the four-car organization we remain today.”
Michael Annett’s career
The backstory:
According to NASCAR, Annett made 436 combined starts in NASCAR’s three national touring series. He was most prominent in the Xfinity Series with 321 starts.
In 2019, Annett won the series’ season-opening race at Daytona International Speedway. It was his only national-level win.
Annett was also a two-time winner in the ARCA Menards Series, once in Talladega and once in Daytona.
Annett debuted in the Xfinity Series in 2008, then went full-time in 2009. He drove for Germain Racing, Rusty Wallace Racing, Richard Petty Motorsports, Turner Scott Motorsports and JR Motorsports, which is co-owned by Dale Earnhardt Jr.
He stepped away from racing after the 2021 season due to a stress fracture in his leg.
The Source: This report includes information and comments from NASCAR, JR Motorsports and NASCAR driver Brad Keselowski.
Motorsports
Michael Jordan, Heather Gibbs headline Friday in NASCAR trial
Michael Jordan took the stand on Friday afternoon in the Western District of North Carolina to close out the first week of the 23XI Racing and Front Row Motorsports v NASCAR antitrust lawsuit trial to much fanfare.
Jordan, who co-owns 23XI Racing with Cup Series driver Denny Hamlin and longtime business associate Curtis Polk, are suing NASCAR and CEO Jim France and the 15-month process reached the trial phase this week.
As a refresher, the court has determined that NASCAR is a monopsony, or in layman’s terms, a buyer’s monopoly. The Sanctioning Body is the only purchaser of premier Stock Car racing teams in the market and the question for the jury is whether or not that market power was used to hurt competition and depress the earnings of race teams during the charter extension negotiation period.
Basically, 23XI and Front Row allege that they would have earned more revenue from NASCAR if not for anticompetitive behavior from France that also took on the form of preventing competition from emerging in the marketplace.
Ultimately, 13 of 15 teams in the Cup Series signed the charter extension after over two years of contentious negotiating but the team owned by Hamlin and Jordan did not, alongside FRM owner Bob Jenkins.
“Someone had to step forward to challenge NASCAR,” Jordan said during his time on the stand.
Much of his one hour made the case that NASCAR should be operated more like the National Basketball Association, where he made his claim to fame, in which the league and teams split revenue closer to 50 percent but also share growth responsibilities more evenly.
“If you share responsibility, the healthiness of the sport can grow,” Jordan said. “It needed to be looked at from a whole different perspective. That’s why we’re here.”
The rebuttal from NASCAR, which was made in court on Friday from defense attorney Lawrence Buterman, is that NASCAR is privately-owned by the France family and is not a stick-and-ball league in which the teams effectively own the sport.
Jordan told Buterman that such privately owned sports ventures are ‘rarely successful.’
And yet, Jordan bought into Hamlin’s vision, and even put up the most money to launch what was originally called ‘Michael Jordan Motorsports with Denny Hamlin.’ He is the majority owner and has put $35 to $40 million into the race team.
He did so despite Polk, who has managed many of his affairs for 35 years, telling Jordan that NASCAR was ‘risky to (his) brand and image’ and risked the loss of tens of millions of dollars ‘but you want to do it so I’m doing my best to manage it.’
To wit, Jordan is a professed life long NASCAR fan and was entirely bought-in to Hamlin’s vision that the NASCAR team could at least make a projected $900,000 profit.
Has the team made a reasonable profit?
“Yes.”
Despite the profits, which Jordan claims is a matter of how professionally run the team is while having his star power to lean on, he doesn’t think the charter system’s current construction is equitable. Jordan said he entered NASCAR with optimistic eyes but found the ‘nature of the business to be unfair’ as he spent more time understanding its economic model.
So then, why did Jordan continue to purchase these charters at continually increasing prices? The third charter cost $28 million after the second cost 13.5 and the initial one cost $4.7 million.
“There was a discussion between me and Denny about being successful… people who know me know I like to win and I will pursue anything to win and getting a third charter improves our chance to win the championship.”
Jordan said he was ‘very invested’ in the sport and there were so few charters available and struck while the opportunity persisted itself … even amidst the contentious charter negotiations they ultimately didn’t sign.
Even in this moment, where his party has sued NASCAR, Jordan believes a refined business model that is an equal partnership would benefit all involved.
“The thing I’m hoping for is you create more of a partnership between two entities,” Jordan said. “If that’s the case, it becomes a more valuable business. If you can ever compromise on the things that matter, you can grow your business.”
As part of the trial, and the cross examination with Buterman, NASCAR got opportunities to continue to build their case as well.
Throughout the week, NASCAR has painted Polk as an outsider who came into NASCAR with Jordan and Hamlin with no other interest beyond eventually getting to the point to where 23XI Racing would sue the Sanctioning Body.
It produced discovered documents where Polk expressed that he found races ‘boring as shit’ and painful to watch.’ As Buterman told the jury through his cross-examination, Jordan and Hamlin genuinely love racing but Polk doesn’t.
Therefore, he doesn’t view it in any other way beyond a business opportunity. Buterman asked Jordan if his longtime manager enjoyed racing like the other partners do.
“Obviously not,” Jordan said.
Buterman presented evidence that showed a text where Polk told Jordan ‘our plan is to be a pest and have a mosquito bite every week,’ during charter negotiations with NASCAR. His plan was to leak financial proposals to the media.
Jordan’s response?
(Thumbs up emoji)
At one point in negotiations, Jordan asked Polk ‘how is it going,’ and Polk said 8-9 smaller teams sent a proposal for a permanent charter system to NASCAR that asked for $11 million per chartered car. It’s 23XI and Front Row’s position that teams need $20 million per and only ended up getting $12.5 million in the 2025 agreement.
Polk said he wanted to have a meeting with them to ‘educate them on why that wouldn’t be acceptable to the teams.’
Jordan’s response?
(Thumbs up emoji)
Polk said eventually he was going to send a different letter to NASCAR with ‘alternative evergreen language.’
There was a moment of levity between Jordan and Buterman before the session ended.
Buterman: “Thank you for your time and thank you for making my nine year old think I’m cool.”
Jordan, to Buterman, who normally wears sneakers with his suit: “You’re not wearing your Jordans today.”
Buterman: “I’m not.”
Heather Gibbs
While Jordan was the headline witness, Heather Gibbs was arguably the most impactful of the day. The daughter-in-law of team founder Coach Joe Gibbs preceded ‘Air Jordan’ the hour prior.
While on the stand, she spoke to her history in the sport, one in which she met the son of Joe … Coy … and fell in love with him and their favorite sport. This was also the first time she had spoken publicly about the November 2022 death of Coy, in which ‘my husband didn’t wake up,’ the morning after their son Ty won the Xfinity Series championship at Phoenix Raceway.
Since then, Heather has been more involved with the day-to-day operations of Joe Gibbs Racing and in the charter negotiations. In this time, she said she fully understand now that the financial realities of the Cup Series are “very challenging for the teams,” especially for a family that has no other business to subsidize their losses.
Heather wrote a fiery letter to NASCAR leadership in response to league commissioner Steve Phelps’ assertion that team spending was reckless. She said the comment bothered her, and while she ultimately believed NASCAR needed a different economic model, heaped praise and respect for the France family.
Upon being given the deadline to sign the charters, one that several high-level team people continue to call a ‘gun to the head’ proposition because that’s what NASCAR leadership seemed to agree that it was in their own discovered words, Joe Gibbs told France ‘don’t do this to us.’
Heather said the final draft came in at 5 p.m. on September 6 and they were given until 6 p.m. to sign it, but independent of matters that they disagreed over, the document was also riddled with grammatical and syntax issues. NASCAR said they would fix these issues with side letters. Heather said the agreement didn’t guarantee any broadcast revenue in the seven-year extension period beyond the first seven years.
When Heather called France, she said his response to their concerns was ‘I’m done with the conversation’ and ‘If I wake up and I have 20 charters, I have 20 charters.’
So why did she ultimately sign it?
Heather said that in real time, she only could think of Coy and JD’s legacy, and that JGR not signing the charters and the risk of losing any kind of agreement was too much to bear.
In cross examination, Heather was asked about this continued issue of charter permanency, making the charters permanent rather than something that has to be negotiated every year, closer to a stick-and-ball league franchise.
She said she used ‘auto-renewal with terms’ to NASCAR as opposed to ‘evergreen’ or ‘permanent’ because there was something about the word ‘permanent’ that bothered Jim.
NASCAR team types each say, despite pushback from NASCAR, that permanent charters doesn’t mean permanent terms. The teams just wanted the asset to be permanent because that would increase it respective enterprise values.
O’Donnell wraps up
All told, between the past two days, NASCAR president Steve O’Donnell spent just short of five hours on the stand between examination, cross examination and re-examination, including the first two hours of Friday morning.
After a Thursday that was spent on NASCAR’s reaction to SRX, and the possibility that it or the teams could launch a competitor to the Sanctioning Body, O’Donnell and his team’s lead lawyer (Chris Yates) spent considerable time addressing that topic.
O’Donnell said there are over 1,000 tracks in the United States that a potential competitor could utilize. He says he has visited at least 125 of them. Of all the tracks in the country, only 30 have NASCAR sanctioned exclusivity clauses attached to them.
Examples provided included Hickory Motor Speedway in North Carolina, South Boston Speedway in Virginia, Barber Motorsports Park in Alabama, Road American in Elkhart Lake, Wisconsin, Pikes Peak International in Colorado and Kern County Raceway in Bakersfield California.
O’Donnell said such a series could partner with IndyCar and run on a street course.
O’Donnell said his concerns about SRX’s emergence was a priority because he says he received a phone call from NBC Sports executive Sam Flood that basically questioned the viability of their rights agreement when CBS and then ESPN was getting a NASCAR variant.
O’Donnell said seeing Chase Elliott driving a NAPA sponsored car in a SRX race was alarming.
O’Donnell also claimed, falsely, that SRX is ‘coming back,’ thus NASCAR didn’t ultimately damage it. Instead, GMS Race Cars bought the physical assets from co-founder Ray Evernham for track day purposes but not the series’ intellectual property.
Motorsport confirmed with multiple individuals associated with SRX that there is indeed no comeback in the works.
While the 23XI and Front Row side have spent the week painting the non-compete clauses as anticompetitive, NASCAR and O’Donnell have used their time to say it was just the byproduct of negotiations.
NASCAR got ‘good faith’ commitments from the teams, who in turn received guaranteed revenue and guarantee starting spots.
“It was about being all in together, working towards the best broadcast deal,” O’Donnell said.
A key tenet of NASCAR’s defense is that the Sanctioning Body cannot reasonably be acting anticompetitively because charter payouts have increased from one term to the next, and enterprise value for a charter on the open market has increased from $1 million in 2016 to $45 million this past season.
“It shows that people believe in the sport,” O’Donnell said. “It’s been a challenge with the litigation but despite that, charter value has increased and private equity has increased the value of charters.”
That’s private equity partnership opportunities that were not permitted under the previous agreement but now permitted.
23XI and Front Row say their charters would be worth multiple times more, over $100,000 on the open market, if they were permanent, however.
O’Donnell said ‘in our minds, the charters were not originally put together to be permanent,’ citing schedule and car evolutions.
There was also a lot of talk with O’Donnell about a cost cap and cost floor, which was proposed as part of the 2025 charter negotiations but never came to fruition. NASCAR generally wants a cost cap to reel in the ‘reckless spending’ that is a well-documented part of its bargaining position with the race teams.
O’Donnell said it’s a 50/50 issue when talking to teams about a cost cap. He says that some teams that ‘are dominating’ may ‘not be enthusiastic’ citing Penske, Gibbs and Hendrick but middle teams are ‘more receptive’ to the idea.
He said that Formula 1 team enterprise value increased higher due to a cost cap system.
A cost floor was also proposed, but O’Donnell said a handful of teams reported to him that they are already below the proposed number and it would be a challenge for them to spend more and be efficient.
So much talk this week has focused on what the teams called its ‘four pillars’ proposal, and that can be seen below.
O’Donnell said that asking for $720 million, which is again the $20 million per chartered entry data point, ‘shocked me’ because the previous rights agreement was only $800 million per year. He said giving that amount to the teams would leave nothing for the tracks and inhibit overall industry growth.
He said IndyCar teams get 25 percent of revenue and that’s $2-2.5 million per car.
In re-examination, Kessler says IndyCar’s TV deal is $8 million per entry, which is $20 million or more to teams.
Kessler: “I think that’s 700 percent of 8.”
O’Donnell: “Okay.”
O’Donnell also addressed Polk, the aforementioned business partner of Jordan, and said meeting with the 23XI Racing executive were ‘the most difficult meeting I’ve had with an individual in my 30 years in NASCAR.
Again, NASCAR has painted Polk as someone who intended from the start to intentionally disrupt the status quo with the goal of eventually bringing this lawsuit.
“Mr. Polk stuck to his messages,” O’Donnell said. “He did not have an appreciation for the sport. He was a businessman who said he could leave anytime. He threatened to kick me out of my own meeting … He wasn’t coming from a place of respect.”
Kessler seized on the ‘respect’ line in asking O’Donnell if NASCAR executives like Phelps have always been respectful of team owners, like Richard Childress.
This was, of course, a reference to discovered text messages between Phelps and Scott Prime where the former expressed repeated frustration with the owner of the legendary No. 3 car by calling him ‘a stupid redneck’ who ‘needs to be taken out back and flogged.’
That particular piece of evidence is barred from being used as an exhibit and NASCAR’s attorney’s, specifically Yates, objected to the question because the jury isn’t supposed to know about it an inflammatory reasons.
That is how O’Donnell’s lengthy time on the stand came to a close.
Notes from Judge Bell
Charles R. Jonas
Kenneth D. Bell, the district court judge overseeing this case since last November warned the NASCAR side that ‘growing the sport’ is not a valid defense. He also said it could be a self-admission.
“Growing the sport is another way of saying increasing the revenues of NASCAR,” Bell said.
He has also finally told the jury about the likelihood that this trial is seemingly going to go beyond its scheduled 10-days over two-weeks timeline.
After dismissing the jury on Thursday, Judge Bell told those in the room that both councils needed to speed things along because the jury was told two weeks and that it’s a burden on them.
“I don’t know that we’re going to finish next Friday,” Judge Bell told the jury. “That remains our goal. I am working to keep things moving.
“Everyone in this court room is paid to be here, some more than others, and while I recognize you all get a stipend, I acknowledge the burden this trial places on you and the court thanks your service.”
Bell thanked the jury for their attentiveness, and that he noticed that everyone locked in, and it was appreciated.
It seems more likely that the trial will end by December 15 or 16 as opposed to December 12.
We want your opinion!
What would you like to see on Motorsport.com?
Take our 5 minute survey.
– The Motorsport.com Team
Motorsports
Saturday Eliminations Results – 2025 Snowbird Outlaw Nationals
It’s race day at the 2025 Snowbird Outlaw Nationals presented by Motion Raceworks at Bradenton Motorsports Park. The historic event serves as the opening race of the second annual Drag Illustrated Winter Series presented by J&A Service, a three-race Pro Mod series paying out more than $275,000 to race winners and the series champion. The event also includes Pro 10.5, True 10.5 N/T, Lil Gangstas, Limited Drag Radial, Ultra Street and more.
Eliminations results will be posted below when they’re available from race control.
Find Friday qualifying results here.
Tune in to the official event livestream on FloRacing here: https://flosports.link/46edcdu
PRO MOD SEMIFINALS


PRO MOD QUARTERFINAL ELIMINATIONS


PRO MOD SECOND-ROUND ELIMINATIONS


PRO MOD FIRST-ROUND ELIMINATIONS




PRO 10.5 SEMIFINALS


PRO 10.5 SECOND-ROUND ELIMINATIONS


PRO 10.5 FIRST-ROUND ELIMINATIONS


This story was originally published on December 6, 2025. 

Motorsports
Three-Way Title Showdown Set for Abu Dhabi Finale – Speedway Digest
Formula 1 arrives at Yas Marina for its most dramatic season finale in over a decade, with three drivers still in contention for the world championship. Lando Norris leads the standings on 408 points, holding a slender 12-point advantage over Max Verstappen and 16 over his McLaren teammate Oscar Piastri. With 25 points available for a race win, the title remains wide open heading into Sunday’s twilight showdown.
Norris enters as the clear favorite. A podium finish will guarantee him his first world championship, regardless of what his rivals achieve. Even if Verstappen wins, third place would be enough for Norris to seal the crown. Anything lower than that, however, could open the door for a late twist.
Verstappen, chasing a fifth consecutive title, must win to have a realistic chance. Victory combined with Norris finishing fourth or worse would hand the Dutchman the championship. A second-place finish could also suffice, but only if Norris slips to eighth or lower and Piastri fails to win. For Verstappen, the permutations are tight, but his recent surge — including back-to-back wins in Las Vegas and Qatar — makes him a formidable threat.
Piastri faces the steepest climb. The Australian needs to win and hope Norris finishes sixth or lower. A second-place finish could keep his hopes alive only if Norris drops to tenth or worse and Verstappen fails to make the podium. Anything less will end his bid for a maiden title.
Qualifying has already set the stage for fireworks. Verstappen starts from pole, with Norris alongside on the front row and Piastri in third. George Russell lines up fourth, ready to play spoiler. Track position is crucial at Yas Marina, where overtaking opportunities are limited and strategy often dictates the outcome. All three contenders have seven wins this season, meaning a tie on points would be decided by second-place finishes — an area where Norris holds the advantage.
-
Rec Sports2 weeks agoFirst Tee Winter Registration is open
-
Rec Sports2 weeks agoFargo girl, 13, dies after collapsing during school basketball game – Grand Forks Herald
-
Motorsports2 weeks agoCPG Brands Like Allegra Are Betting on F1 for the First Time
-
Sports3 weeks agoVolleyball Recaps – November 18
-
Motorsports2 weeks agoF1 Las Vegas: Verstappen win, Norris and Piastri DQ tighten 2025 title fight
-
Sports2 weeks agoTwo Pro Volleyball Leagues Serve Up Plans for Minnesota Teams
-
Sports2 weeks agoUtah State Announces 2025-26 Indoor Track & Field Schedule
-
Sports2 weeks agoSycamores unveil 2026 track and field schedule
-
Motorsports1 week agoRedemption Means First Pro Stock World Championship for Dallas Glenn
-
NIL7 days agoBowl Projections: ESPN predicts 12-team College Football Playoff bracket, full bowl slate after Week 14





