Jake Paul has made himself richer than he ever expected after moving from the world of YouTube into professional boxing.

The YouTuber is set to take on Julio Cesar Chavez Jr on June 28 in his toughest test yet.

Jake Paul’s planned fight with Canelo Alvarez fell apart, but his opponent was replaced by Chavez Jr in the main event of a blockbuster card in California.

This could be one of Paul’s biggest paydays yet, adding to the incredible amount of money he’s made in his career so far.

Jake Paul has made over $60 million since starting his boxing career

Paul has made an astronomical amount of money since beginning his career in professional boxing.

The former Disney Channel actor made his boxing debut in 2020. Paul beat fellow YouTuber AnEsonGib in a quick and easy knockout victory, which earned him a reported payday of $1 million.

His pay for the next few fights varied, going as low as $600,000 for his win over Nate Robinson and over $3 million for his defeat to Tommy Fury in 2023.

Paul’s paydays stayed around the $2 million to $3 million mark until his blockbuster fight with Mike Tyson shattered his records for their November 2024 bout.

Despite claims that Paul was paid up to $90 million for the bout, he claimed in the months before the fight that he earned a more modest $40 million for beating the former World Heavyweight champion.

“I’m here to make $40 million and knock out a legend,” Paul told a press conference in the build-up to the fight.

Looking at the reported figures, Paul has earned an estimated $61.4 million from his boxing career alone. This will increase with the Chavez Jr fight, although it is missing the split of the pay-per-view revenue he will have earned.

That will add even more millions to his purse, making Paul one of the most successful boxers in recent years.

Jake Paul is unlikely to make more on his next bout than the Mike Tyson fight

While Paul’s upcoming bout with Chavez Jr is garnering huge interest, he is unlikely to make as much money on the fight as his last one.

The bout with Tyson in November 2024 earned Paul a reported $40 million. However, the interest in that bout was incredible, which was helped by it being broadcast live on Netflix instead of pay-per-view.

This earned Paul a huge fee, although that made up for a lack of PPV revenue share.

The bout with Chavez Jr is being broadcast on DAZN, which means he will only earn a huge fee if the fight sells a lot of pay-per-views.

While his purse for fighting will be in the millions, it would need to be a massively popular bout to hit the $40 million mark to take his total fight earnings to over $100 million for his career.

by Brandon Jarvis

The Working Families Party is criticizing Democratic lieutenant governor candidate Levar Stoney for the donations he has received for his campaign with a digital ad. However, donors that WFP cited in its criticism of Stoney also give substantial amounts to a long list of Democrats.

“These donors have funded Republicans who advance Trump’s agenda, like Gov. Glenn Youngkin and Attorney General Jason Miyares, and even a Republican candidate for the same position,” WFP said in a news release.

One of the donors referenced by WFP is Thomas McInerney. According to VPAP, McInerney has given $22,500 to Republicans in 2025. However, he has given $138,500 to Democrats, a list that includes gubernatorial nominee Abigail Spanberger, both Democratic candidates for attorney general, and Stoney’s opponent for the lieutenant governor nomination, state Sen. Ghazala Hashmi.

Historically, McInerney has donated more than $1 million to Democratic candidates, compared to $425,000 to Republican candidates.

WFP also cited Pace-O-Matic, the group pushing for the legalization of skill games in Virginia, which has given Stoney $25,000 this year. The company has also given $10,000 to Stoney’s opponent, state Sen. Aaron Rouse, and to Democratic attorney general candidate Jay Jones.

In 2025, Pace-O-Matic has given $142,500 to Democratic candidates and $15,000 to Republican candidates.

Another donor cited by WFP is Basim Mansour, who has donated more than $174,000 to Democrats and $122,000 to Republican candidates. He also donated to Pat Herrity, who was seeking the Republican nomination for lieutenant governor before dropping out for health reasons.

This is not the first attack Stoney has faced this cycle from an outside entity. In May, a conservative organization purchased a billboard in Richmond blaming him for the city’s January water crisis.

“Let’s be real — when the far right and far left are both attacking you, you’re probably doing something right,” Stoney said in a statement to Virginia Scope. “I don’t play politics to please the extremes. I will continue to run my positive campaign to ensure every Virginian gets a fair shot, no matter who they are or where they live.”

WFP told Virginia Scope that they are not endorsing a candidate in the lieutenant governor race.

When asked if they plan to attack other Democrats in these races who accepted money from these donors, like Spanberger, WFP said they are only focused on the lieutenant governor primary.

View the ad below:

‘Changed my life’: Woman raises money for high school senior who worked Burger King shift the day of graduation

David Weigel: Do you want to see New Hampshire vote first in 2024?

JB Pritzker: To be clear, I’m not here about any of that. We just finished a presidential election. Could we take a breath and talk about the congressional elections coming up in 2026? We need Chris Pappas to win for the United States Senate.

I think New Hampshire is a good early primary state — just as an observer of presidential elections, for a lot of years. I think it needs to be paired with other states, with other demographics. That’s absolutely possible now that we’ve got South Carolina, Nevada on the calendar. But New Hampshire is a really fascinating place, it’s a small place, and it allows people to come, when they run for president, and not need a lot of money, and be able to meet a lot of voters.

What role are you taking to help Democrats in 2026? How much of it is financial support?

I’ve traveled around the country to try to help Democrats everywhere. It’s been a personal endeavor, not so much about the financing of campaigns as it is about making sure that we’re pressing forward on the message of what we stand for. Right? We’re a party that stands up for working families, and the candidates that we support are the quality candidates that people want to serve in Congress.

I’ve also supported candidates financially wherever I could, and the Wisconsin race is a great example of that. Compared to Elon Musk, you might say that I got an awfully great return on investment. I think it’s $30-$40 million that he spent, not to mention offering, what, a million dollars a piece to a few people to get them to vote Republican? That seems illegal to me. But yes, I put my money where my mouth is. I happen to have the ability to support people financially.

One reason I ask is that, in Wisconsin, when Republicans were asked about Elon Musk’s spending, they’d point to you and say, Democrats have out-of-state billionaires too.

(Pritzker holds one hand high and one hand low, to illustrate the gap in their spending.) Elon Musk is one of the — well, the wealthiest person in the world, right? That was a very important race, and it’s going to make an enormous difference. The Republicans have been manipulating politics in Wisconsin, and I wanted to make sure that it was a fair fight.

Bernie Sanders has been rallying around the country, talking about the threat of an oligarchy. Do you think you’re included in that?

Well, would you put me in the same category politically as Elon Musk? I would not. I think what people talk about, when they talk about an oligarchy, is the group of the most powerful people in the society who are trying to impose their will on everyone else and make them pay for what the oligarchs are unwilling to pay for. That is clearly the opposite of what I believe in, right? I am a Democrat. I’m someone who believes in little D democracy, and someone who believes that the very people who ought to be in charge are the working families of our country, the working families of the state of Illinois, and not the wealthiest people in our state or in the country. You can use whatever word you like, but I’m saying, there’s a big difference between the people that Bernie Sanders is talking about and what I believe in.

Two questions about Congress. The House Education Oversight Committee is investigating whether the clinic at Northwestern’s Law School, which now obviously is the Pritzker law school, endorsed antisemitism by representing people in Gaza protests. Was that antisemitic, to defend those protesters?

I’m not getting involved in what they’re attacking universities about, except to say this: The attack seems to use antisemitism to actually go after what they believe are liberal institutions. The reality is that universities are places that house free speech, that give an opportunity to young people to exercise their academic capability. When there was a Muslim ban imposed in Trump’s first presidency, his first term, I went to O’Hare and there was a table of lawyers there to make sure that the law was being followed for people who were legal residents returning to the United States. I met the folks at that table, and some of them were from, guess what, the Pritzker School of Law at Northwestern.

I was very proud of that fact, right? These are young people who believe in something, they’re out there standing up for it. I don’t think the universities should be under attack by the federal government. So many of the great developments that exist in our society, our universities developed. So to have the federal government decide that they’re just going to pull away from universities and use antisemitism as an excuse seems un-American to me.

You’re also being invited to the House Oversight Committee to talk about “sanctuary cities.” What’s going to be your defense, if you go?

Yeah, they have about 800 different ways of defining a sanctuary state or sanctuary city. We have a law on the books that was signed by my Republican predecessor called the Trust Act. All it does is it says that our local officials, local law enforcement, can’t be sequestered by the federal government to do the federal government’s job — that what we need is for our police to be stopping violent crime on the streets of Chicago or across the state of Illinois. It lets police do their job.

By the way: I want every violent criminal who’s undocumented, a violent criminal who is convicted, removed from my state and the country. And I think every Democrat should be saying that from the rafters. What we also want is comprehensive immigration reform. What does that mean? It means that people who are law-abiding, hard working, tax paying people who happen to be undocumented and have been in this country for some years — that we ought to find some path for them, right? These are the very people that, if you had a good immigration system, you’d want to have come into the country.

My family came here as refugees. My family would not have survived if this country hadn’t let them in. So, I’m a believer that immigration is not just good because we’re saving lives, but also because it’s good for our economy. And let me add one other thing: We need to secure the border. This all goes together, securing the border and having comprehensive immigration reform and finding a path for people to stay legally in this country who are law-abiding, tax paying people. Right now, we’ve got a policy that’s ruining the country, taking up citizens and disappearing them from the streets and ignoring habeas corpus.

Bill Gates announced he will give away “virtually all” his wealth through the Gates Foundation in the next 20 years. The Microsoft founder plans to distribute around $200 billion through his foundation, that centers on global health and equity initiatives, before he shutters the organization in 2045.