Connect with us
https://yoursportsnation.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/call-to-1.png

NIL

Breaking Down SEC Basketball Transfer Classes

Published

on

Breaking Down SEC Basketball Transfer Classes

With the transfer portal playing such a huge role in how college basketball rosters are built these days it is more difficult than ever to know the different rosters in your league. For that reason we will be breaking down the transfer portal classes of every single team in the SEC with a multiple part series. Here is part one:

 

Kentucky

Denzel Aberdeen (Florida)
Mouhamed Dioubate (Alabama)

Jayden Quaintance (Arizona State)

Jaland Lowe (Pittsburgh)
Kam Williams (Tulane)
Reece Potter (Miami OH)

Many people will say that Kentucky has one of if not the best transfer portal classes in the country and it boasts a lot of proven high-major talent alongside some upside swings to round it out. Of course, we have to start with Denzel Aberdeen, a player who Kentucky targeted to bring championship pedigree as well as some defensive toughness to shore up what was a very offensive group a year ago. Also tasked with helping the defense is Mouhamed Dioubate, an athletic forward who has struggled to score in his college career but brings a lot on the other end. Perhaps the biggest pickup, and also the biggest question mark, is Jayden Quaintance. Some of you will remember that name from when Florida recruited the big man who was one of the top bigs in the 2024 class, and someone who was made even more valuable by the fact that he was too young to go one-and-done to the NBA so he was destined to play two years in college. His freshman campaign with Arizona State was going really well until he suffered a torn ACL, something that puts his starting point with Kentucky into question. Assuming he gets back to full strength, he will be one of the top centers in the country. 

 

Another big pickup was Jaland Lowe who will be leaned on in the scoring department after putting up 16.8 points and 5.5 assists per game for Pittsburgh. Lowe struggles to shoot the three but can get to the paint whenever he wants, and that proven production at the high-major level was what drew the eye of Mark Pope.

One of the highest upside pickups was Kam Williams, a 6’8” forward from Tulane who filled up every statistical category averaging 9.3 points, 4.5 rebounds, 1.3 assists, 1.4 steals, and 1.1 block per game–and this was as a freshman.

Size is always hard to get, so Kentucky went to the MAC to find 7’1” Reece Potter at Miami OH who wasn’t all that productive–but Pope wanted size in the system. 

 

Auburn

Kevin Overton (Texas Tech)
KeShawn Murphy (Mississippi State)
Keyshawn Hall (UCF)

Elyjah Freeman (Lincoln Memorial)

 

 

In the midst of the greatest stretch in Auburn basketball history the Tigers lost a lot of talent last year, and it might have been tough for them to bring in the same level of talent through the portal. You might remember Kevin Overton from his game against the Gators in the NCAA Tournament, a reserve wing with good size who averaged 7.8 points per game.

KeShawn Murphy spent the last three years with Mississippi State, and after his first two seasons saw him as more of a project with potential at 6’10”, things did come together last year with him averaging 11.7 points and 7.4 rebounds per game, and that’s production you’d expect he repeats given that he’s staying in the same league.

Keyshawn Hall will be expected to bring a lot of offense after he did something last year that nearly every transfer is unable to do–increase his production while jumping up leagues. In 2023-24 with George Mason Hall averaged 16.6 points per game which earned him a transfer up to UCF in 2024-25 where he averaged 18.8 points per game. Now, doing this jump again to the SEC could be even more difficult–but we’ll see if he’s up to the challenge.

One of the most interesting transfers in the SEC is Elyjah Freeman, an extremely rare Division-II to SEC transfer. Freeman played for an excellent DII team in Lincoln Memorial where he averaged 19.3 points and 9.1 rebounds per game. A 6’8” forward, Freeman is versatile and hungry, and a good season from him could change the way a lot of high-major teams look at D-II basketball. 

 

Oklahoma

Xzayvier Brown (Saint Joseph’s)
Derrion Reid (Alabama)

Nijel Pack (Miami)
Tae Davis (Notre Dame)

Porter Moser doesn’t necessarily have the recruiting resources of a lot of SEC teams so it’s always interesting to see who he is able to reload with, and this year saw him get a lot more proven high-major talent than ever which speaks to just how dominant the SEC is in terms of 2025 recruiting.

Xzayvier Brown is a 6’2” bucket getter from Saint Joseph’s and will have two years of eligibility remaining after an excellent start to his college career. As a team Saint Joseph’s has underachieved recently relative to their talent, but Brown has been able to prove his own acumen averaging 17.6 points per game last season. At just 165 points the physical challenge of the SEC could be notable, but he plays the game fearlessly.

Derrion Reid is yet another athletic wing who has started his career at Alabama, put in a couple of successful years in a complementary role, and then goes elsewhere looking for more touches. At 6’8” and 220 pounds with good explosiveness, he’ll bring the kind of athleticism the Sooner roster needs.

Nijel Pack is a name you will probably recognize for one of two reasons–one, because he’s been in college forever and will be in his sixth season, or two, because his name was attached to the first major NIL related recruiting story when he moved from Kansas State to Miami in 2022. Whatever the case may be, Pack is as reliable a player as there is in college basketball and he’ll now get a sixth year after playing just 9 games last season before suffering a season ending injury. In five years, all at the high-major level, he has averaged 12.7, 17.4, 13.6, 13.3, and 13.9 points–so it’s safe to say you can pencil him in for rock solid production at Oklahoma. 

 

Tae Davis will also add to the length at Oklahoma as a 6’9” forward who showed some nice touch as a junior scoring 15.1 points per game at Notre Dame.

Overall, this is a solid group for Oklahoma who should help Porter Moser field a scrappy team. 

 

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

NIL

College Football TV Ratings: Army-Navy Game averages 7.84 million viewers

Published

on


Once again in its standalone window, America’s Game came down to the wire last week. Ultimately, Navy got a second straight victory over Army, and it became CBS’ most-watched college football game of the season.

An average of 7.84 million people watched as Navy came away with the victory at M&T Bank Stadium in Baltimore. While it’s a 17% decrease from last year’s 9.4 million viewers – the best since at least 1990 – it’s still the second-best viewership for the game since 2018, according to Sports Business Journal’s Austin Karp.

SUBSCRIBE to the On3 NIL and Sports Business Newsletter

Last year’s Army-Navy game topped the previous high mark of 8.45 million viewers in 1992. In addition, it tops CBS’ slate of games this year, beating out the 5.6 million viewers who watched Indiana at Oregon in Week 7, according to data compiled by On3.

This year’s Army-Navy game also marked the last for CBS analyst Gary Danielson in the booth. He has worked 17 matchups between the two programs and will get ready for retirement following the Sun Bowl later this month. Charles Davis is set to join Brad Nessler in CBS’ lead booth starting next season.

With the victory, Navy extended its advantage in the all-time series against Army, which dates back to 1890. The Midshipmen have an all-time 64-55-7 record against the Black Knights.

How it happened: Navy defeats Army

Navy struck first in the first quarter of last week’s game, taking a 7-0 lead on a Blake Horvath touchdown. But Army responded with 13 points in the second quarter, including a rushing touchdown from Cale Hellums, to take the lead into halftime.

The two teams traded field goals in the third quarter as Army took a 16-10 lead into the final 15 minutes. That’s when Navy completed the comeback as Eli Heidenreich caught the 8-yard touchdown pass from Horvath, putting the Midshipmen back on top, 17-16. That held as the final, giving Navy a second straight win over Army in the historic game.

Horvath led the charge for Navy, rushing for 107 yards and a touchdown on the ground while adding 82 passing yards to go with the touchdown pass to Heidenrich. On the Army side, Hellums had 100 rush yards and a touchdown to go with 82 passing yards.

Both Army and Navy are now getting ready for their respective bowl games. The Midshipmen will head to the Liberty Bowl on Jan. 2, 2026 against Cincinnati while the Black Knights will square off against UConn in the Fenway Bowl on Dec. 27.



Link

Continue Reading

NIL

Ohio State QB Julian Sayin Announces NIL News Before College Football Playoff

Published

on


Julian Sayin is looking to lead the Ohio State Buckeyes to the national title alongside several other stars like wide receiver Jeremiah Smith.

Ohio State heads into the College Football Playoff with one of the best rosters in the country, starring Sayin and Smith along with wide receiver Carnell Tate, safety Caleb Downs and linebacker Arvell Reese.

Advertisement

They’re heading into the playoffs as the No. 2 seed after losing to Indiana in the Big Ten title game. The Buckeyes will have a bye week to begin the CFP.

Other teams that will benefit from the bye week include Indiana, Texas Tech and Georgia.

During his time off, Sayin shared some exciting news off the field. The Ohio State Buckeyes quarterback has partnered with Wingstop and Dr Pepper in his latest NIL deal.

“Postseason calls for big plays with @drpepper and @wingstop, had to get the play card out,” Sayin posted.

Advertisement





Link

Continue Reading

NIL

Stars Stay, Others Head to Portal

Published

on





College Football’s QB Carousel: Stars Stay, Others Head to Portal



































Link

Continue Reading

NIL

Texas A&M’s KC Concepcion has ‘not made a decision’ regarding future

Published

on


Dec. 16, 2025, 5:06 a.m. CT

Texas A&M’s 2025 offense finished the regular season ranked 19th nationally, while starting quarterback Marcel Reed threw for a career high 2,932 yards and 25 touchdowns, with 13 going to star wide receivers KC Concepcion and Mario Craver, who completely rejuvenated a passing attack that failed to move the needle in key games down the stretch last season.

While Craver is expected to return next season for his all-important junior year, Concepcion has a choice to make regarding his future, choosing between a final year in College Station or declaring for the 2026 NFL Draft, where he is expected to be a first or second-round selection.

Whatever choice he makes is entirely up to him and his family, and while those of us in the media have written numerous articles about his draft standing, returning for his senior season could benefit his NFL future. Still, Concepcion is as mature as they come and is entirely focused on facing the Miami Hurricanes this Saturday during the first round of the College Football Playoff.





Link

Continue Reading

NIL

Josh Pate defends Joel Klatt amid G5 backlash, proposes second tier to College Football Playoff

Published

on


FOX Sports analyst Joel Klatt found himself in a social media firestorm after comments he made about the Group of Five on a podcast appearance on Next Round Live. Clips of that interview quickly went viral with short snippets of some of the quotes.

The gist of those snippets suggested that Klatt was anti-G5, to the point of wanting the G5 kicked out of the College Football Playoff. Klatt intimated that the only thing keeping the G5 in the playoff currently is the threat of litigation.

College football analyst Josh Pate had his own thoughts on Joel Klatt’s take. He mostly came to the defense of the suddenly targeted analyst.

Pate first played a couple clips from Klatt’s appearance in their entirety. That offered more full context.

“Some of that was insane, I’m going to grant you that,” Pate said of Klatt’s points. “I just want to say the foundation of it I at least understand. The foundation of it is sound. Not all the parts of it. The foundation of it is sound.

“Couple of quotes there. No. 1, the G5 is in the College Football Playoff to avoid litigation is basically true.”

Pate lambasted the use of quote edits in condensing Joel Klatt’s much larger point into a few soundbites. He tried to explain how that’s misleading to his viewers.

“You know sometimes how you see a snapshot or a small soundbite of something and you get outraged by it and then you go on to learn the context of it two weeks later and you’re like, ‘Wow, I probably shouldn’t have gotten as outraged as I did over that,’ Pate said. “That is what is happening to Klatt. Admittedly he brought a lot of this on himself. …

“Now, what you probably saw was you probably saw quote edits like this or quote graphics like this. And if you’re listening on podcast just imagine scrolling through your social feed and there’s a picture of Klatt, looks like he’s somewhere sunny and happy and there’s a quote at the top, and it says, quote, ‘We don’t want Cinderellas. We want the best teams playing each other at the end. It’s the dumbest tournament and the least fair tournament in all of sports.’”

That part from Joel Klatt, obviously, was what many detractors latched onto. But it doesn’t take away from Klatt’s overall point about the G5, Pate pointed out.

So all the moaning over James Madison being in the playoffs is for naught. That’s just the way the current structure is set up.

“They are present in the playoff, they’re granted an auto bid in the playoff because if they are not then lawsuits will be filed immediately,” Pate said. “So that part’s accurate.

“Now whether or not you think it’s morally sound that they’re included in the playoff, that’s your own opinion. He’s got his, I’ve got mine, you’ve got yours. But he is right. Because in no other merit-based world where we just judged these teams on a static scale of quality, of resources and therefore what you do with the resources, and the results on the field and strength of schedule, in no world would James Madison be in the playoff. But the parameters of the playoff right now are that we take the five highest-ranked conference champs. So by every current rule James Madison is in the playoff and should be in the playoff. I don’t disagree with that. Tulane is in the playoff and should be in the playoff. I don’t disagree with the structure. I don’t disagree with the body of the playoff this year based on the current rules.”

So what’s the solution? Well, Joel Klatt also offered an answer for that. It just didn’t happen to go viral with the other stuff.

Klatt believes the G5 should effectively break off from the power conferences and host its own playoff. It would be a playoff tier between the FCS and the FBS.

“That’s been the same point that’s been made on my show,” Pate said. “So you notice if you really hated the G5 you’d just say, ‘Piss on the G5.’ That’s not what he did, despite the fact that that part didn’t get shared widely and it’s not what I’ve ever done on this show.

“Any time you have a problem with something, you ought to have a solution for it. So if your problem is, ‘Man, it makes little sense that we’ve got 136 teams pretending to play the same caliber of the sport’ you need to have a solution. That solution he just presented is the same one we’ve shared on this show, and that is a G5 playoff.”



Link

Continue Reading

NIL

How NIL has transformed Ohio State’s recruiting from star-chasing to strategic roster building

Published

on


COLUMBUS, Ohio — The days of simply collecting as many five-star talents as possible in college football recruiting are over.

In a revealing Buckeye Talk podcast episode, Ohio State analysts Stephen Means and Andrew Gillis detailed how the program has shifted to a more sophisticated “roster construction” approach that mirrors NFL team building more than traditional college recruiting.

“I think that because the financial aspect has come into this but also just logical roster building that has become more of a focal point than star, star, star, star, stars,” explained Stephen Means. “Because for a long time, college football was like, get as much talent as you humanly can, develop it, cuz you were living in a world where the top 1% of college football had all the talent. And that’s not true anymore.”

This fundamental shift in philosophy is perhaps most evident in how Gillis described Ohio State’s running back recruiting needs for the 2027 class. While five-star David Gabriel Georgees tops their board, the approach is more nuanced than just stacking elite talent.

“If they got three five stars running backs, the odds that we got on this podcast and said that’s actually probably not that good is higher than it might seem because we were saying why is your asset management this? Like because hey, look at your your receiver recruiting was down. You couldn’t have spent some of that money on a receiver,” Gillis explained.

The financial component of recruiting has transformed how Ohio State approaches each position group and recruiting class. It’s no longer just about who’s the best player available, but whether investing heavily in one position might shortchange another.

“It is a math equation. It is a money equation at this point. You’re not going to go get three five stars at running back in a single class,” Gillis emphasized.

Means further elaborated on how NIL money has forced this change: “You can’t pay a fivestar recruit, fivestar recruit money and then have the guy sitting on the bench because there’s another guy with there’s only so much money to go around.”

This strategic approach has Ohio State looking at players through different lenses: “ready to go” immediate contributors (typically five-stars and top-100 recruits), “developmental” prospects (usually ranked 200-350 nationally), and “depth” pieces who might be ranked lower but fill specific roles.

The analysts identified several instances where this approach is evident in Ohio State’s 2027 planning. At quarterback, they’re content with a developmental prospect in Brady Edmonds rather than chasing another five-star. At wide receiver, despite already having five-star Jir Brown committed, they believe Ohio State needs another elite receiver plus two depth pieces to properly structure the room.

“Now we are talking about roster construction,” Means said. “And the reason why we structured it this way is okay, they went and got a devel they have a developmental quarterback in 2027. They probably need a ready to go quarterback in 2028 and they probably need a depth quarterback in 2029. And the cycle continues, right?”

This staggered approach ensures Ohio State will have players at different stages of development at every position, creating a sustainable pipeline of talent ready to contribute when needed.

“Everybody everybody’s running the same race, but they can’t be running it at the same pace or you’re not going to have a team to field every single year,” Means added.

The conversation revealed how Ohio State’s recruiting approach now more closely resembles NFL roster management, with considerations for “salary cap” (NIL budget), positional value, and development timelines all factoring into decisions that previously might have been simply about collecting the highest-ranked players available.

As college football continues to evolve in the NIL era, this strategic roster construction philosophy may become the new standard for elite programs looking to maintain sustainable success.

Here’s the podcast for this week:



Link

Continue Reading

Most Viewed Posts

Trending