Connect with us

College Sports

CFP format proposals

As the College Football Playoff world debates proposed formats for 2026 and beyond, the architect of what many consider the nuclear option has remained deafeningly silent. Big Ten commissioner Tony Petitti, creator and purveyor of the controversial 4-4-2-2-1 model, has yet to explain himself. Why should the Big Ten and SEC receive four automatic bids […]

Published

on

CFP format proposals

As the College Football Playoff world debates proposed formats for 2026 and beyond, the architect of what many consider the nuclear option has remained deafeningly silent.

Big Ten commissioner Tony Petitti, creator and purveyor of the controversial 4-4-2-2-1 model, has yet to explain himself.

Why should the Big Ten and SEC receive four automatic bids to the postseason regardless of their performance during the regular season?

Why should the Big 12 and ACC accept two bids (each) and not attempt to earn more on the field?

Why is predetermined playoff participation good for the sport? How would it benefit ESPN, which is bankrolling the event?

Petitti’s silence stands in contrast to his counterparts:

— Throughout SEC spring meetings last week, commissioner Greg Sankey answered questions (in person and via Zoom) and took intense criticism for his positions on the CFP. The conference’s coaches and athletic directors alike added their perspective to the hottest topic in college sports.

— After Big 12 meetings last week, commissioner Brett Yormark told reporters that he supports the so-called 5+11 model that grants five bids to conference champions and 11 to at-large teams. “I think there’s real momentum, “ he said. “Certainly, the public is voting yes for it.”

— Following the ACC meetings in the middle of May, commissioner Jim Phillips talked of the need for “fairness in the system and access” to the CFP, although he did not dive into specifics.

The Big Ten held similar meetings in May. The low-key affair had no news conference, no Zoom call, no nothing … except radio silence.

Petitti owes the sport, and its fans, an explanation. He’s the face of the conference that proposed a revolutionary change to the most significant event in college athletics. And he’s one of two commissioners, along with Sankey, in possession of codified authority to determine the CFP’s format starting in the 2026 season.

That authority came courtesy of a memorandum of understanding signed last year by the other FBS conferences (and Notre Dame). They were justifiably concerned the Big Ten and SEC, armed with the biggest brands and deepest pockets in the sport, would break away and create their own postseason.

Petitti and Sankey leveraged their way to near-total control, and now Petitti is pushing a format that radically changes the competitive landscape.

Not in eight bajillion years would the NFL guarantee the NFC North two playoff berths regardless of on-field results.

Why should the Big Ten get four automatic bids?

Petitti’s silence is rapidly turning the conference into the villain — quite an accomplishment given the years-long animosity so many fans have held for the SEC and ESPN.

But Sankey, a creature of college sports, understands the need to include the masses in a process as momentous as determining the format for a 16-team playoff.

Petitti was hired two years ago following a career in sports media and broadcasting. He’s not fully comfortable in the public-facing role, preferring to toil behind the scenes. That approach has earned respect internally. “You know he’s not in this for himself,” one Big Ten campus source said earlier this spring.

Were this any other topic, Petitti’s work in the shadows wouldn’t be so conspicuous. But the CFP is different, and the Big Ten’s proposal is radically different.

That said, the 4-4-2-2-1 model makes all the sense in the world from Petitti’s perspective:

— It allows the Power Four to schedule marquee non-conference games without fear of those losses being held against them by the CFP selection committee and its opaque process. (The Big Ten, in fact, is exploring a crossover series against the SEC.)

— It protects the Big Ten, which plays nine conference games, from being placed at a competitive disadvantage relative to the SEC, which only plays eight, in the selection process. (The SEC is considering a nine-game conference schedule.)

— It allows the Big Ten and SEC to create play-in games on championship weekend with, for example, the No. 3 seed facing the No. 6 seed and No. 4 playing No. 5 — with CFP bids at stake in both. In theory, the play-in games would add value to regular-season matchups that wouldn’t otherwise have playoff implications.

The A-level non-conference games and the play-ins have one thing in common: TV value. They could create new revenue for the conferences as schools prepare to share $20.5 million with athletes.

The interconnected pieces are best understood if taken in reverse order: To offset the revenue-sharing costs, the conferences need cash. The best way to generate cash? Create new TV inventory. But that new TV inventory would increase the risk of additional losses that could be used against the Big Ten in the selection process. In order to insulate itself from the whims of the committee, the Big Ten wants automatic bids.

Ultimately, Petitti is accountable to the Big Ten presidents and chancellors and no one else. But the public narrative matters in college football. That’s why Sankey, Yormark and Phillips have been out in front.

This is college football. Everyone is motivated by self-interest. The Big Ten is no different from the SEC. It’s just that Petitti’s means to his end is nothing short of revolutionary.

Or, to some, revolting.

Petitti isn’t bound by privacy agreements with his fellow commissioners. Sankey and Yormark have already talked in detail about their preferences and the sentiment on their campuses. It’s time to come clean.

The College Football Playoff isn’t like antitrust settlements or conference realignment or NCAA legislation. ESPN holds the broadcast rights, and the Big Ten and SEC have format control. But it belongs to the public.

An explanation of the 4-4-2-2-1 model — with all the benefits it would bring to the sport for years to come — might win the Big Ten a few converts.


*** Send suggestions, comments and tips (confidentiality guaranteed) to wilnerhotline@bayareanewsgroup.com or call 408-920-5716

*** Follow me on the social media platform X: @WilnerHotline

Originally Published:

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

College Sports

Hockey fans believe in miracles’ | Penn State men’s hockey’s path from club team to the Frozen Four | Penn State Men’s Hockey News

When Penn State hockey pioneer Roy Scott arrived on campus in 1971, he was disappointed the school didn’t have a hockey team. To address that issue, former coach Joe Battista said Scott went around and received nearly 5,000 signatures from students, petitioning to create a club hockey team. As Scott and his teammates began to […]

Published

on


When Penn State hockey pioneer Roy Scott arrived on campus in 1971, he was disappointed the school didn’t have a hockey team.

To address that issue, former coach Joe Battista said Scott went around and received nearly 5,000 signatures from students, petitioning to create a club hockey team.

As Scott and his teammates began to play as a club team, initial thoughts swirled around about elevating the team to Division I status. At the time, however, they were just happy to have a competitive place to play hockey.

“We just wanted to play,” Scott told The Daily Collegian. “It seemed like whether it was going to be a true Division I or not were immaterial at the very beginning.”

Fast forward 15 years, and Battista had joined Penn State as a coach for the club team. From the moment he set foot on campus in 1986, Battista began pushing for Division I status from the moment he stepped foot on campus.

“We put together proposals in the early 80s, in the late 80s, in the early 90s, in the late 90s, in the early 2000s, in the mid 2000s,” Battista told the Collegian. “We had done the groundwork, the feasibility studies, of what it would cost to make the program Division 1.”

Those dreams started tiptoeing their way to reality when athletic director Tim Curley was appointed seven years later. Scott returned to the program for an alumni event years later, where Curley approached him about the future of the program.

“I remember Tim Curley coming up to me on some alumni weekend,” Scott said. “And he said, ‘Scotty, I love hockey. Penn State would really love to have a full Division I team. All we need from you is $30 million dollars.’”

The team won its first ACHA National Championship a few years later in 1997. Five years later, Penn State had itself another four league championships.







Penn State men's hockey ACHA Championship

Coach Joe Battista lifts the 2001 ACHA National Championship trophy after Penn State defeated Delaware at the 2001 ACHA National Championship Game in Tucson, Arizona.




As the club team racked up success under Battista, administration began looking for donors to support the program in becoming a Division I sport. 

In comes Terry Pegula. Although Pegula didn’t play hockey for the university, Scott said he showed interest in funding Penn State’s project after growing his love for hockey as a volunteer youth coach. On top of that, Pegula was also a Pennsylvania native.

In 2011, Pegula donated $88 million to elevate the Nittany Lions to Division I status after nearly 40 years of efforts  — a donation that wound up reaching $102 million. 

At the reception ceremony where the university accepted Pegula’s gift, Scott met Craig Patrick, the assistant coach of the Pittsburgh Penguins and the Team USA squad that won a gold medal, a run that became known as the 1980 Miracle on Ice.

“I went up to Mr. Patrick and introduced myself,” Scott said. “I told him, ‘Tonight, Penn State hockey fans believe in miracles.’”

Penn State began its first season as a Division I program in 2013, where it unveiled the newly built Pegula Ice Arena. It opened back-to-back years with losing records, but in Year 3, coach Guy Gadowsky — who initially coached the club team beginning in 2011 — did what he was hired to do: win.

“(When I interviewed him), I was so blown away by him, I called the Pegulas up,” Battista said. “They were in Philadelphia at a Sabres (versus) Flyers playoff game, and so coach Gadowsky and I drove to Philadelphia. We went and met the Pegulas before the game, and they interviewed him. After a half hour, Kim (Pegula) walked up and said, ‘Guy’s awesome.’”

Over the next three years, the Nittany Lions built on their record as they fought for postseason success. In 2017, the next step of the dream came true as the blue and white won its first Big Ten Tournament title and earned its first NCAA Tournament appearance.

“I just thought the blueprint was laid out perfectly to have a really competitive hockey (team),” John Davis, a former player, told the Collegian.

As the postseason wins stacked up and the Nittany Lions gained newer and hotter recruits, fans and players alike knew a turning point was coming soon where they would officially put themselves on the map.

“They’ve been close for a couple years now,” Chase Berger, a former player, told the Collegian. “You want to see the program go to new heights.

While the 2024-25 season ultimately ended in new heights, the path there was unlike most.

Through the first two months of the season, Penn State was 0-8 in conference play and 7-9 overall — a poor position for a team  seeking a bid into the NCAA Tournament.

“I had buddies texting me like, ‘What’s going on,’” Alex Limoges, a former player, said. “It seemed like a down year, and then at Christmastime, they started getting hot and couldn’t lose for a while.”

After falling to Notre Dame in a shootout at Wrigley Field to open 2025, the Nittany Lions began to turn their record around. Over the next three months, Gadowsky’s squad won two shootouts over No. 1 Michigan State, defeated No. 2 Minnesota in overtime and tallied only three losses in 17 games.







Men's hockey vs Michigan State, Lugris scores

Forward Dylan Lugris (16) scores the game-winning shot during a shootout in Penn State men’s hockey’s matchup against Michigan State at the Pegula Ice Arena on Saturday, Jan. 11, 2025 in University Park, Pa. The Nittany Lions defeated the Spartans 3-2 in a shootout.




“These guys were waiting to get over the hump,” Berger said. “They’ve been knocking on the door for a while. I think they broke through.”

As the blue and white entered the Big Ten Tournament, it swept No. 4-seeded Michigan in the best-of-three quarterfinals before falling in overtime to Ohio State in a semifinal heartbreaker.

“The turning around is phenomenal,” Davis said. “I think that’s what they should be most proud of.”

The Nittany Lions earned a bid to the NCAA Tournament, beginning with a first-round matchup against Maine in Allentown.

With a dominating 5-1 victory over the Black Bears, Penn State was set up for the regional final and NCAA quarterfinal contest versus UConn with a spot to the Frozen Four on the line. 

“There was just an energy and an excitement,” Battista said. “It was everything we’d always dreamed about when we dared to dream that we’d be a Division I hockey program.”

The blue and white had been in that same spot before in 2023 when it was just an overtime goal away from the last four against Big Ten rival Michigan. However, it was the Wolverines who put the Nittany Lions to bed and still searching for a first Frozen Four. 

But Penn State was determined to change that two years later. After tying up with the Huskies going into the final five minutes of regulation, sophomore Matt DiMarsico put the Nittany Lions ahead en route to their first-ever Frozen Four appearance with an overtime winner.

“I just remember the moment when they scored that goal,” Battista said. “I just left my feet, grabbed my wife, hugged her and jumped up and down. I’m crying, and it’s like I don’t know, it was just years of wow, what an amazing turn around.”

While Penn State ultimately fell in its Frozen Four appearance against Boston University, the team provided a once-in-a-lifetime experience to its faithful fans.

“I think obviously the players and coaches are really excited, but I think it’s also just really nice to award the fans that have always been so good in Penn State hockey,” Berger said. “They’ve always traveled, they’ve always supported.”

As the Frozen Four match put Penn State on the map and earned high-level transfers and recruits like Mac Gadowsky, Kevin Reidler, Luke Misa and Jackson Smith, the final step of Penn State’s goal appears closer to its reach.

“I don’t think we’ll have to wait too much longer for a national championship,” Limoges said.

MORE HOCKEY CONTENT


NHL draft reactions | Penn State men’s hockey earns first NHL first-round pick

Last Friday night, all in attendance at the Peacock Theatre — home of the 2025 NHL Entry Dra…

If you’re interested in submitting a Letter to the Editor, click here.



Link

Continue Reading

College Sports

What we saw and heard from Sabres prospects at development camp

BUFFALO, N.Y. — Three years ago, the Sabres had Jack Quinn, JJ Peterka, Owen Power, Mattias Samuelsson and Peyton Krebs at development camp. A few months later, all five of those players were on the NHL roster playing meaningful roles. In 2025, development camp had a much different feel for the Sabres. The roster had […]

Published

on


BUFFALO, N.Y. — Three years ago, the Sabres had Jack Quinn, JJ Peterka, Owen Power, Mattias Samuelsson and Peyton Krebs at development camp. A few months later, all five of those players were on the NHL roster playing meaningful roles.

In 2025, development camp had a much different feel for the Sabres. The roster had eight forwards, 12 defensemen and five goalies. Nobody who played for the Rochester Americans last season, including 2024 first-round pick Konsta Helenius, was at camp. Typically, the Sabres have done a three-on-three tournament with three different teams. This time around, it was just two teams scrimmaging. This is the second straight year most of Buffalo’s top prospects have been kept home for the development camp. For a team that is heavily invested in drafting and developing its own talent, this seems like a development opportunity worth taking advantage of.

“I don’t know if it’s a philosophy change,” GM Kevyn Adams said. “A lot of the guys who were in Rochester, it’s a taxing year. The goal at this camp is less about being on the ice and more about getting familiar with the organization and who’s who and what does everybody do and what does it mean to be a Sabre. So a lot of the guys that maybe in other years would have been here, (Konsta) Helenius is the perfect example. He’s not new to the organization now because he’s been here and he’s been in Rochester. That’s part of it. I think sometimes, especially with Rochester’s length of the season, you want to make sure they get the rest and then get right into their training and don’t be disruptive in terms of some of the thoughts if you’re bringing guys over. It’s a smaller group this year but the picks this year and then last year other than Konsta. So it’s not so much philosophical. Just more so how it played out.”

This year was the 10th anniversary of the Sabres drawing a near sellout crowd at KeyBank Center for Jack Eichel’s development camp. The crowd at the Harborcenter on Thursday morning was sparse by comparison. This camp has always been more of an orientation for new prospects than it is an evaluation of players who have been in the system. But the excitement and competition that were present in years past weren’t the same with the smaller roster.

So many of the Sabres’ top prospects are playing in Rochester, including first-rounders Isak Rosen, Noah Ostlund and Helenius. The Amerks’ season didn’t end until late May, so they played a lot of hockey this year.

But new strength coach Brian Gallivan was in town this week, putting the prospects through intense off-ice training. Sabres first-round pick Radim Mrtka was laughing at the end of the week because he estimated “half the guys were puking” on testing day. The Sabres have drafted a lot of players over the last few years who need to get stronger and could have benefited from some face time with Gallivan and his staff. This could have served as a mid-summer accountability check.

“They can do Zoom calls,” Adams said. “They’re on programs, and (Gallivan) has already taken care of that. It’s not as critical. But it is something we did talk about.”

Ultimately, development comes down to a lot more than one week in July. The absence of the top prospects just left more room for others to stand out. Here’s what we saw and heard from Buffalo’s prospects this week.

1. 2022 sixth-round pick Jake Richard seems to be an annual standout at development camp. This summer was no different. During the three-on-three scrimmage, Richard scored a hat trick and then added a shootout goal to top it off. Goals in a summer scrimmage don’t mean much, but it was notable that Richard, one of the older players at camp, decided to take charge of the scrimmage in front of the big club’s decision makers.

“That’s not really something I’m thinking about during the game, it was just the competitive spirit in me that wanted to win a hockey game,” Richard said. “Everyone on the bench was like, ‘We’re not losing this game.’”

Richard took a huge step at UConn this season. He scored 15 goals and had 28 assists in 34 games. His shot has always stood out, but he’s added a strong netfront component to his game as well. Richard came up to Buffalo earlier this summer and has been getting in extra work with Sabres skating coach Mike Ansell. Richard has been staying with Sabres draft pick Gavin McCarthy, who was his junior teammate in the USHL. Skating has been Richard’s biggest focus for the last few years. The Sabres had some talks with Richard about turning pro this spring, but he wanted to go back to school to try to win with the core group UConn is bringing back. He can become a free agent if not signed by next August.

Amerks coach Michael Leone coached Richard a few times in international tournaments and said, “The transformation he made this season was incredible.” Leone noted that the bigger the game, the better Richard seemed to play in a demanding Hockey East season.

“His natural instincts, especially around the net, his ability to find space,” Leone said. “He has a really good stick in tight areas. His ability to get pucks and tip pucks, too. You don’t see that a lot with younger kids, the ability to play in traffic and tip pucks. All things you guys see at the next level are really important. How many goals are scored around the net area? He has a lot of good tools.”

2. Mrtka looked the part of a steady and smooth defenseman throughout the week. It’s always tough to judge defensemen in a three-on-three setting, especially when most of the top forward prospects weren’t in town. But what stood out is the way Mrtka carries himself on and off the ice. He’s confident and mature, two qualities that Sabres assistant general manager Jerry Forton pointed out on draft weekend.

3. The Sabres had five goalies at camp, including Scott Ratzlaff and Topias Leinonen, who both signed their entry-level contracts this spring. The NHL signing of Alex Lyon means there’s a chance Devon Levi spends part or most of the season in Rochester. That could result in one or both of Ratzlaff and Leinonen spending time in the ECHL this season as a development tool.

Ratzlaff is probably the more refined of those two goalies at this stage in his career. The Sabres made a bet on the size and mobility of Leinonen. He just needs to become more consistent technically, and goalie development coach Seamus Kotyk said he saw him take steps in that direction this season.

Sabres fourth-round pick Samuel Meloche has the same offseason goalie coach as Levi, and it’s noticeable in the way both goalies move around the crease. Meloche’s quickness is his best trait. Kotyk noted Meloche could end up playing college hockey at some point, but he’s still 17, so it might be another year.

4. Third-round pick David Bedkowski was unable to take part in any of the team practices this week because of an illness. He came down with what he thinks was strep throat while flying back from the NHL Draft. Meanwhile, 2023 second-round pick Max Strbak was not at development camp because of a personal matter.

5. There are always sneaky standouts at these camps, and 2025 fifth-rounder Ashton Schultz was one this week. The Chicago Steel forward from Minnesota is only 5-foot-11, but his hockey sense and competitiveness make him a real pest around the net. On one shift early in the scrimmage, Schultz had four shot attempts from right around the crease. If he can build the strength to match his mentality, Schultz could have a future. He said he plans to play one more year in the USHL before going to North Dakota.

6. The Sabres did not extend a qualifying offer to 2021 second-round pick Aleksandr Kisakov. That seems to signal the end of the road for Kisakov with the organization. He played 13 games for the Amerks last season after playing 32 and 48 games in the two years prior. The Sabres also no longer hold the rights to 2021 third-round pick Stiven Sardarian, who was a point-per-game player at Michigan Tech last season. According to PuckPedia, Sardarian is no longer a college student, so it’s unclear what his playing future looks like.

(Photo of Radim Mrtka: Matt Winkelmeyer / Getty Images)



Link

Continue Reading

College Sports

All Five Golfers Named WGCA Scholar All-Americans

Story Links CORAL SPRINGS, Florida – The 2024-25 WGCA All-American Scholar Team was announced on June 30 with 1,499 women’s collegiate golfers from 403 programs recognized with this prestigious honor. The criteria for selection to the All-American Scholar Team are some of the most stringent in all of college athletics […]

Published

on


CORAL SPRINGS, Florida – The 2024-25 WGCA All-American Scholar Team was announced on June 30 with 1,499 women’s collegiate golfers from 403 programs recognized with this prestigious honor. The criteria for selection to the All-American Scholar Team are some of the most stringent in all of college athletics and continue to demonstrate the high-level academic achievements of our players.

To be selected, a student-athlete must:

• Have an overall cumulative grade point average of 3.50 or higher.

• Be an amateur and on the team’s roster through the conclusion of the team’s season.

• Have played in 50% of the college’s regularly scheduled competitive rounds during the year nominated through the team’s conference championship.

All five of Ithaca College’s golfers on the spring roster were honored by the WGCA – Abby Bladen, Rheanna DeCrow, Annika Michel, Annelise Stencel and Helena Winterberg.

 



Link

Continue Reading

College Sports

Schienbein named to 2025 Team Canada Junior National Training Squad

Story Links WORCESTER, Mass. – Rising senior Megan Schienbein of the Holy Cross field hockey team has been named to the 2025 Team Canada Junior National Training Squad, as announced by Field Hockey Canada. One of just 25 female Canadian field hockey players to be named, Schienebein has the opportunity to train with […]

Published

on


WORCESTER, Mass. – Rising senior Megan Schienbein of the Holy Cross field hockey team has been named to the 2025 Team Canada Junior National Training Squad, as announced by Field Hockey Canada.

One of just 25 female Canadian field hockey players to be named, Schienebein has the opportunity to train with the top U-21 field hockey players in the country and can earn a spot on the final roster for upcoming tournaments, including the Junior Pan American Games and the Junior World Cup.

Schienbein, a native of North Vancouver, British Columbia, started all 17 games for the Crusaders on defense last season, tallying three goals and two assists for eight points. In her three seasons on The Hill, Schienbein has suited up in 49 games, starting 32, tallying 12 points on four goals and four assists.

Full training squad roster

FOLLOW THE CRUSADERS

Be sure to follow the Holy Cross field hockey team — and all things Crusader Athletics — on social media!

Twitter – @HCrossFH | @goholycross

Instagram – @hcrossfh | @goholycross

Facebook – Holy Cross Field Hockey | Holy Cross Athletics

YouTube – GoHolyCross





Link

Continue Reading

College Sports

BC Men’s Hockey Forward James Hagens Unpacks Bruins Development Camp and Future

The Boston Bruins 2025 Development Camp—which featured current and future Boston College men’s hockey forwards Andre Gasseau, James Hagens, Dean Letourneau and William Moore—wrapped up Thursday afternoon with post-practice media sessions. Dev Camp 2⃣0⃣2⃣5⃣ is in the 📚 pic.twitter.com/rxY59QFRLD — Boston Bruins (@NHLBruins) July 3, 2025 Hagens, the Bruins No. 7 overall pick in the […]

Published

on


The Boston Bruins 2025 Development Camp—which featured current and future Boston College men’s hockey forwards Andre Gasseau, James Hagens, Dean Letourneau and William Moore—wrapped up Thursday afternoon with post-practice media sessions.

Hagens, the Bruins No. 7 overall pick in the 2025 National Hockey League (NHL) Draft, who averaged a point per game in 37 games for the Eagles last season as a freshman, spoke about his experience at camp and gave more insight into what his future might hold.

The college and professional hockey world is still eager to find out if Hagens will stay with BC for another year or head straight to the NHL on a rookie deal, likely at the two-way level so he can develop in the American Hockey League (AHL)—the NHL’s farm league—before heading to the professional ranks. 

Here is everything Hagens had to say in his press conference:

Q: Cut from clip.

HAGENS: It’s awesome being able to get on the ice, put a Bruins jersey on. You know, meet the staff, go through this camp and just be a part of this.

Q: You get to play a little hockey today. How did that feel—after the drill heavy stuff? 

HAGENS: It felt great. Being able to go out there and play five-on-five, three-on-three. All the scenarios. It was awesome. 

Q: What can you take out of this moving into the rest of the summer?

HAGENS: How hard it is. If you want to crack a lineup here it’s going to be really hard. You’re going to have to do all you can. It’s not easy at all so it’s just being prepared and getting ready for it.

Q: What kind of conversations have you had with the staff?

HAGENS: Yeah, actually gonna go have [the conversation] in the next 20 minutes, so I haven’t heard much. I’ll find out then.

Q: At this stage do you expect to go back to Boston College?

HAGENS: I don’t know what’s going to happen. It’ll be nice talking to the [Bruins] staff and hearing what they have to say. It’s a talk you have to have with your family, coaches and the staff of the Bruins.

Q: Inaudible

HAGENS: This is really cool. When you’re out on the ice, these kids could be out at the pool, out in the sun. And, you know, they’re showing up to the rink to watch us out there. It’s so cool. These fans take so much pride in the Bruins and to be a part of this. You want to be able to give your heart and soul back to that.

Q: What do you have to do to be on this team?

HAGENS: You want to be able to put on muscle, gain weight, you wanna be ready. You wanna be able to work for a roster spot at the Bruins—whether that’s going back to school or doing it right away. I wanna be a Bruin really bad so no matter the timeline I’ll work towards that.

Q: You said you’re up to 190 [pounds]?

HAGENS: Yeah, I think up to 190, 195. I came home from school at around 178, 177, so I was able to put on a lot of weight—good weight. It’s been really helpful, I’ve been making sure I’m eating the right things, working out, making sure I put on muscle. It’s not just fat.

No games are scheduled for Friday, July 4.

No games were scheduled for Thursday, July 3.

56 days. 

“Wen you think of the great offensive defensemen, it starts with Brian Leetch, in my mind.”

– Matt Gilroy

Check us out on… 





Link

Continue Reading

College Sports

Sermon on the Mat (July 3, 2025)

Welcome back to the Sermon on the Mat, your weekly one-stop shop for news from the wider world of wrestling beyond the big cable TV monoliths that get all the coverage, with a special focus on shows that air on IWTV and TrillerTV. Coming soon… On IWTV Beyond Wrestling Open Episode 183 (July 3, 7:30 […]

Published

on

Sermon on the Mat (July 3, 2025)

Welcome back to the Sermon on the Mat, your weekly one-stop shop for news from the wider world of wrestling beyond the big cable TV monoliths that get all the coverage, with a special focus on shows that air on IWTV and TrillerTV.

Coming soon…

On IWTV

Beyond Wrestling Open Episode 183 (July 3, 7:30 pm ET)

  1. Amity LaVey vs. Kylie Alexa
  2. Marcus Mathers (c) vs. Rex Lawless (IWTV Independent Wrestling World Championship)

NTPW Texas Contenders Series 54 (July 3, 8 pm CT)

  1. Jesse Alexander Carter vs. Jesse Funaki
  2. Buzzsaw Samuels vs. Lavon Vontrell, Jr.
  3. Jackpot J-Rock vs. KC Kr’eme
  4. Devin Carter vs. Jak Calloway
  5. Jay Davis (c) vs. Pac Ortega (NTPW TCS Championship)

BST Star Spangled Bash (July 5, 3 pm ET)

  1. Ashley Vox vs. Liviyah
  2. Andy Brown vs. Steven Stetson
  3. Brick City Boyz (Julio Cruz & Victor Chase) & Wrecking Ball Legursky vs. Richard Holliday & Swipe Right (Brad Baylor & Ricky Smokes)
  4. DieSpora (Angelo Carter & Kwesi Asante) (c) vs. Melodies From Heaven (Brother Greatness & Stan Michael) (BST Tag Team Championship)
  5. Airica Demia vs. Amity LaVey
  6. Dustin Waller (c) vs. Mantequilla (BST Territory Championship)
  7. Donovan Dijak vs. “A-Game” Joseph Alexander
  8. Mortar vs. Sammy Diaz (c) (BST Championship)

Beyond Wrestling Open Rhode Island Episode 14 (July 7, 7 pm ET)

  1. Aaron Rourke vs. Jariel Rivera
  2. Steven Stetson vs. Timothy Thatcher

On TrillerTV

wXw Drive of Champions (July 3, 8 pm ET)

(Ordinarily I disqualify pretaped shows from Sermon if I catch that they’re taped while I’m writing it, but since I decided to list cards out for every show this week and I had already finished writing this one out before I figured it out, I’m letting it slide.)

  1. Bobby Gunns vs. Metehan
  2. Anil Marik & Norman Harras (c) vs. Planet Gojirah (wXw World Tag Team Championship)
  3. Ahura vs. Leon Slater
  4. Aigle Blanc vs. Ricky Marvin
  5. Marius Al-Ani (c) vs. Zozaya (wXw European Championship)
  6. Elijah Blum vs. Steve “1 Called” Manders (c) (wXw Unified World Wrestling Championship Texas Death Match)

GCW Backyard Wrestling 7 (July 4, 2 pm ET)

  1. Moshpit Mike vs. North Korean Assassin
  2. Crazy Mike vs. “Jumpin’” Joe Janela
  3. AK47 vs. Kage
  4. Pizza Cat vs. Pizza Cat, Jr.
  5. Lil Skittle vs. Mister Jay (No Ropes Barbed Wire Deathmatch)

GCW The Top Play (July 5, 2 pm ET)

  1. Bear Bronson vs. Beastman
  2. Elayna Black vs. Zayda Steel
  3. Dr. Redacted vs. UltraMantis Black
  4. Parrow vs. Richard Holliday
  5. Mance Warner vs. Man Like DeReiss
  6. Charles Mason & SLADE vs. EFFY & Steve “1 Called” Manders
  7. Billie Starkz, Megan Bayne, & Miyu Yamashita vs. Marcus Mathers & YDNP (Alec Price & Jordan Oliver)

Free matches here!

2025 PWA Rumble

Lince Dorado vs. Rocky Romero

AAW Crush & Destroy 2025

As always…

Remember folks, no matter what type of wrestling you like, no matter how down you feel about the state of WWE, AEW, Impact, ROH, or any other “big-time” pro wrestling, there’s something out there for you. There’s a pro wrestling product that can hit you in the right spot and make you love wrestling like you thought you’d never be able to love it again. It’s there, I promise. You just gotta reach out and find it, and that, my friends, is what the Sermon on the Mat is all about.

Continue Reading

Most Viewed Posts

Trending