WEST LAFAYETTE − The financial allotment for college athletes went from one extreme (legally nonexistent) to another when the NCAA instituted name, image, and likeness (NIL), allowing student-athletes to capitalize on their marketability.

Football | June 10

DeKALB, Ill. – Northern Illinois University will welcome alumni, celebrate its football history, honor members of the military and first responders, teachers and more during its final season in the Mid-American Conference as the promotions for NIU’s 2025 football home games were announced on Tuesday.
 
NIU kicks off its 124th college football season on August 30th versus Holy Cross on “First Saturday in Huskie Stadium” with fans encouraged to wear red and help celebrate Football Champions Weekend with stars of the past.
 
The Huskies next are home on Saturday, September 27th to take on San Diego State in the annual Salute to Service game, which will also include high school band day, scout day and a celebration of teachers in conjunction with Extra Yard for Teachers Week.
 
On Saturday, October 4th, the oldest Homecoming in the state of Illinois will be celebrated for the 118th time with NIU taking on MAC foe Miami for the Mallory Cup. In addition to welcoming alumni from across the country, the Huskie Football program is extending a special invitation to former football student-athletes.
 
The Huskies and Ball State will battle for the Bronze Stalk Trophy in DeKalb on Saturday, October 25th during Family Weekend, which has also been dubbed the cancer awareness game and youth sports day. NIU employees and health care workers will be recognized and can take advantage of ticket discounts.
 
NIU plays its final midweek #MACtion game on Tuesday, November 18th versus Western Michigan with the Huskies’ MAC finale set for Friday, November 28^th on “Black Friday” with a Black Out (wear black). Prior to the game, which kicks off at 11 a.m. (CT), 2025 seniors and their families will be honored.
 
The list is not final as additional promotions will be added as they are finalized.  
 
Season ticket prices for NIU’s six 2025 home games begin at as little as $110 each for a general admission ticket. With the purchase of the Huskie 4-Pack (four or more tickets), pay $110 each for a reserved seat in sections A, B or F on the West Side. Reserved west side seats are priced at $152 or $170 with discounts available for NIU alumni, NIU faculty/staff, DeKalb County residents, seniors (62+) and members of the Varsity Club (former student-athletes).
 
Fans who purchase 2025 Huskie Football season tickets by June 30th of this year automatically qualify for the “Lock In” rate, giving them the ability to purchase similar season tickets in 2026 and 2027 at 2025 prices, provided they meet the season ticket deadline each year. 
 
Renew or purchase tickets for the 2025 NIU Football season now online at NIUHuskies.com/tickets. For more information, call the NIU Ticket Office at 815-753-PACK (7225) weekdays between 9 a.m.-5 p.m. or email huskiestickets@niu.edu.
 
— NIU —
 
Twitter: @NIUAthletics
Facebook: NIU Huskies
Instagram: niuhuskies
YouTube: NIU Athletics Official
 
 

Former Maryland men’s basketball guard Ja’Kobi Gillespie has plans to take Blueprint Sports — the company that manages Maryland’s NIL contracts — to mediation court, as reported on Monday by Taylor Lyons and Sam Jane of the Baltimore Sun.

Gillespie transferred to Tennessee after the 2024-25 season when former head coach Kevin Willard left Maryland for Villanova.

According to the Baltimore Sun, Gillespie’s father, Byron Gillespie, and lawyer, Issac Connor, claim that the former Maryland guard did not receive his final payments for his deal with Maryland.

Gillespie’s camp also claimed that there was no clause in Gillespie’s contract with Maryland that would terminate the deal if he transferred.

According to Inside Maryland Sports, Maryland’s former NIL Director Harry Geller disagreed with Gillespie’s claim.

In other news

Former Maryland men’s basketball guard Melo Trimble was named the VTB League playoffs MVP for the second straight season after leading CSKA Moscow to the championship.

Former Maryland football safety Beau Brade suffered an apparent lower-body injury during OTAs with the Baltimore Ravens, according to Jeff Zrebiec and Kevin Oestreicher.

Former Maryland football quarterback Taulia Tagovailoa went 15-of-29 for 230 yards with three touchdowns and one interception in his second game with the Hamburg Sea Devils of the European League of Football.

Former Maryland women’s basketball guard Katie Benzan was named the general manager of the Salt Lake City Stars, the Utah Jazz’s G League affiliate.

Class of 2028 defensive lineman Tervon Glass received an offer from Maryland football.

Class of 2027 receiver Davion Vanderbilt received an offer from Maryland football.

Maryland baseball right-handed pitcher Joey McMannis entered the transfer portal on Monday, according to 64Analytics and D1 Baseball.

Former Maryland baseball first baseman Holis Porter committed to Texas Tech in the transfer portal.

Maryland men’s basketball will face Virginia on Dec. 20 in Charlottesville, according to Jon Rothstein.

Exclusive: How Former Athletes Benefit From House v. NCAA Settlement originally appeared on Athlon Sports.

Over the weekend of June 6th, a pivotal decision was made that will profoundly impact the entire realm of college athletics. Judge Claudia Wilken approved the House settlement between the NCAA and its conferences, enabling member institutions to compensate their athletes directly for the commercial use of their names, images, and likenesses.

Advertisement

The annual allotment per school will officially be determined at a later date, but estimates have the allotment payout sitting at roughly $200 million dollars per school, with expected increases each year. This crucial decision will change the very landscape of college athletics when it goes into effect on July 1st, with current and future athletes reaping most of the benefits. Full disclosure: I’m one of the many expected to receive a payout on a retroactive basis from my time at Georgia Tech, Arkansas, and Colorado.

Numerous inquiries have emerged in response to this highly anticipated resolution. But one question particularly resonating with former athletes: Is there a means for me to derive any benefit? The answer to this question is unequivocally, yes!

Within the settlement agreement, the NCAA will compensate approximately $2.8 billion in retroactive damages to athletes who participated in college athletics from the academic year 2016 onward. Emails containing login information to claim their share were sent to all former eligible athletes on file.

For those former athletes that qualify, you would have had to file your claim on collegeathletecompensation.com before or on January 31st, 2025. However, the claim tab on the website is still open to filing

Advertisement

This website also has a plethora of information on important dates, court documents, FAQs, and much more relating to the case. It also enables athletes to view an estimate of their potential compensation from the settlement.

The payout breakdown encompasses various factors, primarily benefiting former football and basketball players from Power Five programs. Additional factors contributing to the breakdown include, but are not exhaustive, “broadcast NIL payment,” “video game NIL payment,” “Compensation for Athletic Services payment,” “Lost NIL payment,” and “Hubbard payment.”

As a former student-athlete and transfer student between three Division I universities in three different Power Five conferences, I observed three distinct compensation estimates for each institution.

Upon comparing these estimates, I identified a significant disparity in compensation based on the university, despite all institutions being members of the Power Five conference. The highest payout is anticipated to be awarded to former SEC student-athletes by a substantial margin, although each payout remains a substantial sum for the former student-athletes of any institution.

Advertisement

Based on the provided information, it appears that the SEC leads in terms of settlement distributions. However, all former athletes are compensated equitably for their contributions and impacts during their tenure at their respective institutions.

Related: Michigan Running Back’s Groundbreaking NIL Deal Redefines College Football

Three years at Georgia Tech was nearly the equivalent to one at Arkansas. Also, the year at Colorado shows a clear demand from Deion Sanders and the ‘Prime Effect’. It’s less than my 2022 season in Fayetteville, but given the shape of Pac-12 and how we carried the conference in ratings, it’s comparable.

Related: How the NCAA House Ruling Could Reshape UNC Basketball

As the new era of college athletics commences, it is prudent to acknowledge the uncertainties that lie ahead. Legal proceedings continue to unfold to ensure that all student-athletes, both past, present, and future, receive the most optimal opportunities and experiences.

Advertisement

As new information becomes available and inquiries arise, we will diligently provide timely updates on the latest developments pertaining to this settlement and name, image, and likeness.

This story was originally reported by Athlon Sports on Jun 10, 2025, where it first appeared.

College sports continue to rapidly change, with coaches and administrators looking to stabilize the sport. Now, former head coach Mack Brown feels he has a solution to at least the chaos of the Transfer Portal. That’s cutting it down to one window in the winter.

As of now, there are two windows for football players to enter the Transfer Portal. One comes in December, following the regular season. The other is following spring practice. Brown, as he explained on See Ball Get Ball, thinks keeping that to just the winter, and adjusting the schedule is key for college football.

“Right now, I would move the Playoff back as far as I could, and I would have one window,” Mack Brown said. “And I would have it in January, and I would try to have it after the national championship game, and before school starts the next two or three weeks. Then, you have your team for the spring.”

The Transfer Portal windows have already been cut down significantly in how long they’re open. Coaches haven’t been done there, though, and many have advocated for further changes, including going down to one window. Others have advocated for an April-only window. Regardless, most want some kind of change.

The challenge of the spring window, in Mack Brown’s mind, is highlighted by the current situation at Cal. The Golden Bears saw their roster get raided this offseason, including some massive losses to the running back room in the spring. That group of outgoing backs included star Jadyn Ott.

“Cal, I was told, lost five running backs after spring practice. How do you lose five running backs and replace them? You can’t,” Brown said. “So, we don’t need people tampering with guys all spring. We don’t need guys out in spring practice that are thinking about leaving. And we don’t need coaches that are coaching kids that aren’t gonna be there.”

The winter calendar has largely been discussed as being chaotic. Between high school recruiting, bowl prep, the College Football Playoff, and the Transfer Portal, things can be chaotic. Mack Brown knows this, which is why he’d address that by rearranging the schedule as much as possible. That could go so far as to even cut back on the number of games played so that players can make their transfer decisions while keeping in line with academic calendars.

“So, let’s go through our season. Let’s do the best we can do. Probably gonna have to cut back on some games during the Fall or move them back a little bit,” Brown said. “But let’s try to get the season over where we have a window where you can still transfer if you want to, because the top kids know where they’re going anyway. They’ve got agents now. I don’t think they even call it tampering anymore because usually when the kid said, ‘I’m in the portal, but listen, I don’t want any contact.’ Well, yeah, he knows where he’s going.”

The House Settlement, which was recently approved by the judge overseeing the case, is going to be the next major change to college sports. Seeing how that impacts the Transfer Portal will probably need to come first, at least for a short period, before any major changes like removing a window are made.

With the House vs. NCAA settlement approved, college athletics is about to begin the latest chapter in its long history of attempting to interfere with the market for athletes’ services.

Let’s see if this version holds up better in court than all the ones before it.

As you know by now, the House settlement has given birth to a new system by which schools for the first time can directly pay their athletes up to $20.5 million this coming school year. The schools will insist these are purely NIL deals and do not constitute “pay-for-play,” but of course, they are entirely contingent on the athlete playing for that university. And that’s fine. Nothing wrong with paying someone for their services.

But where the settlement veers into outright market manipulation is the establishment of a new NIL Go clearinghouse, operated by Deloitte, by which athletes must submit all deals they receive from outside sources that exceed $600. Which, in the major sports, is pretty much all of them. If Deloitte deems, say, a running back’s $1 million deal from a school’s collective to be above “fair market value,” he cannot accept it.

In every other industry in this country, “fair market value” is whatever someone is willing to pay you. Just ask the many mediocre football coaches who make $6-8 million a year. Or the athletic directors who make $1.2 million a year to hire those mediocre coaches. No clearinghouse for those folks.

Every legal expert I’ve spoken with about this subject thinks there’s little chance this clearinghouse would survive a legal challenge. It sure sounds like yet another instance of competitors (in this case, the Power conferences) conspiring to limit athletes’ compensation. Go back and read the Supreme Court decision in Alston v. NCAA to see how the highest court in the land feels about restrictions on athletes’ compensation.

It’s somewhat poetic the House settlement got approved during Game 3 of the WCWS, where $1M pitcher NiJaree Canady nearly led Texas Tech to an improbable national title.

Because the purpose of the new Deloitte NIL clearinghouse is to stamp out collectives like Texas Tech’s.

— Stewart Mandel (@slmandel) June 7, 2025

Nevertheless, the Power conferences — it’s them, not the NCAA driving this — are pressing ahead. On Monday, they proudly unveiled their newly created enforcement entity, the College Sports Commission, led by former Major League Baseball executive Bryan Seeley, who is likely being paid seven figures to make sure college athletes stop getting paid seven figures. Presumably, they’ve consulted with their lawyers, who have told them the thing is ironclad. The next Judge Wilken will be totally fine with it.

By now, you may be asking yourself, “Why are they doing this? Who exactly is being harmed by a transfer quarterback getting $3 million from a school’s collective?” Athletes going into the portal at any moment is an understandable source of frustration, but the House settlement does nothing to address that issue. It just wants to curb how much one gets for going into the portal.

The stated reason, as Nick Saban, for one, has said 1,000 times, is the need for a “level playing field.” It’s not “fair” that Texas Tech has an oil billionaire willing to spend $10 million-plus on the transfer portal if Alabama doesn’t have one. How many times have we heard: This is not what NIL is intended for.

It doesn’t particularly matter at this point what NIL was intended for. This is what it’s become. Collectives became a thing specifically because schools didn’t want anything to do with paying athletes. Now that they’re forced to, they want to unwind time and reverse things.

But what’s really rich is the whole “level playing field” thing.

There has never, ever been a level playing field in college recruiting. The schools with the most money have always held an advantage over everyone else. They have the most history, the biggest stadiums, the best-paid coaches and the most lavish facilities. Ohio State was dominating Purdue in recruiting long before there were ever NIL collectives, and the Buckeyes will keep dominating in the revenue-sharing era. You could set the cap at $60.5 million, not $20.5 million, and there’s still no scenario where the Boilermakers would be able to outspend the Buckeyes.

Meanwhile, people have been so busy the past few years shouting that the sky is falling that they’ve failed to notice that NIL may be the first development in history that’s actually given a larger pool of teams a chance at landing top talent.

The top quarterback in the portal this offseason, Tulane’s Darian Mensah, did not go to Georgia or Ohio State. He chose Duke, where he’s getting a reported $4 million NIL deal. The nation’s No. 1 men’s basketball recruit, A.J. Dybantsa, is not going to North Carolina or Kansas; he’s going to BYU, for a reported $5 million deal. And last year, softball phenom NiJaree Canady turned down that sport’s biggest juggernaut, Oklahoma, in favor of Texas Tech, which gave her that sport’s first-ever seven-figure deal. Earlier this month, she and her team ended the Sooners’ reign — and she signed another deal.

All of those deals got done before the House settlement was approved. Had they not, theoretically, Deloitte could flag them for being too far above “market value.”

Clearly, booster-driven collectives aren’t going away. If Oracle founder Larry Ellison wants to give the next Michigan quarterback recruit $4 million, it seems highly unlikely someone could tell him no. Either the collectives will get more creative in how they structure their deals, or someone is going to sue and succeed in getting an injunction.

Neither the schools nor the athletes would be the ones filing that suit because they’re bound by the settlement. But boosters aren’t bound by it. Companies aren’t bound by it. And, most concerning to the conferences, state attorneys general aren’t bound by it. They’re the folks who succeeded in getting both the NCAA’s booster restrictions and transfer restrictions shot down.

We know this much: Most schools that plan to offer the maximum $20.5 million in House payments are following a formula by which they’ll allocate around $13 million for football and $3 million for men’s basketball. Ohio State last year spent $20 million on football alone, and many schools are spending way more than that this year. Kentucky is one of several programs planning to spend more than $10 million on men’s basketball.

Coaches’ and administrators’ salaries have only gone up and up and up over time, but the powers that be seem to think they can make athletes’ unofficial salaries go down with their magic clearinghouse.

That’s not generally how markets work.

(Photo: Carmen Mandato / Getty Images)