Connect with us

NIL

Collegiate sports out of control

Either adapt, or get left behind. That is the clear message being given to college basketball and football coaches across the country. The same can be applied to some of the so-called “lesser” sports as well. It’s a world we couldn’t have envisioned just a few short years ago, but it’s apparent that the […]

Published

on


Either adapt, or get left behind.

That is the clear message being given to college basketball and football coaches across the country. The same can be applied to some of the so-called “lesser” sports as well.

It’s a world we couldn’t have envisioned just a few short years ago, but it’s apparent that the purpose of the “Name, Image, Likeness” policy adopted by the NCAA has gotten out of hand. Initially, the thought was, great, the athletes deserve a piece of the pie, with many colleges and universities raking in exorbitant amounts of money, while the athletes were shunned. Apparently, a free college education wasn’t enough, so as is the case in nearly every aspect of our lives these days, the answer has become money, and lots of it. When NIL originated, it was assumed by many that it would be wonderful if the athletes received some compensation for jersey sales, and they would be allowed to do commercials, autograph sessions, and the like. However, it quickly became much, much more than that.

The larger universities can afford enormous payrolls when it comes to roster-building, so that’s precisely what is occurring. It is just another example of the rich getting richer, and the primary reason that more than 2,000 collegiate basketball players entered the transfer portal. Allegiance and loyalty are terms of the past for most so-called student-athletes, who have essentially become professional athletes by going to the highest bidder.

Perhaps the governing body of college sports should change its name to the National Professional Collegiate Athletic

Association, or the NPCAA. The jury is still out on whether or not NIL and the transfer portal are ruining college sports, but there is a growing segment of observers and fans who feel that is the case.

However you feel about the changes, they’re here to stay, so if you cannot or will not adapt, which has seemingly been the case for several respected college basketball coaches in the past several years, you move on and/or retire. NIL and the portal are not going away anytime soon (or ever) and in a way, that’s truly a shame. You might say it’s just a reflection of society today, where money and greed have taken over many aspects of America, but that still doesn’t make it right, or palatable to a majority of college sports fans.

The NCAA is either powerless or gutless when it comes to making the changes necessary to reel it in, so we’re left with college sports being a mere extension of professional sports. There should at least be some guidelines to adhere to when it comes to paying athletes to play collegiately, but at the present time, it’s the Wild, Wild West, where the best of the best high school players, along with those in the portal, are merely seeking the biggest paycheck.

*****

IS THE UK BASKETBALL ROSTER SET? – It appears the University of Kentucky is adapting quite well to the new reality of spending money on building the best roster possible. Some of the experts and pundits are placing the Cats near the top of the always way too early polls for the 2025-26 basketball season, with their large payroll being one of the main reasons. There are admittedly several other reasons that players are attracted

to UK – a winning tradition, luxurious facilities, and more – but it sure doesn’t hurt to have deep pockets from various boosters and corporations in this day and age.

On paper, Kentucky looks to be deep and talented heading into preseason workouts, but assuming their ninth national championship is a foregone conclusion is foolhardy at best. The SEC will again be formidable, and there are numerous other schools out there paying big bucks for stud players. That’s not to say UK hasn’t put together an impressive group, but the challenge for head coach Mark Pope and his staff will be to get them to play as a team.

The Cats are also waiting to see if their leading scorer from last year’s team, Otega Oweh, will be back since he’s testing the NBA waters. Says here he will return; after all, he isn’t likely to be drafted, and he can make more money at UK than he would in the G-League.

*****

PERRY HEADING TO WESTERN? – One of the downsides of the transfer portal is that the handwriting may be on the wall for players who aren’t expected to see a ton of minutes.

That appears to be the primary reason former Mr. Basketball Travis Perry to announce at the last minute that he’s entering the portal and moving on from Lexington. Perry was forced into more action than he would’ve normally gotten last year due to injuries to Lamont Butler, Jaxson Robinson, and Kerr Kriisa, and showed he has a long way to go defensively. He’s maybe 6-foot-2 at best, and at that height, you better be quicker than quick if you want to succeed in big-time college hoops.

There has been no shortage of rumored locales where Perry will turn up in the fall, but I wouldn’t bet against him going to Western Kentucky. You have to admit that Conference USA is nowhere near the Southeastern Conference in terms of talent, and Perry could be announcing he intends to become a Hilltopper in the near future.

*****

BENGALS REACHING AGAIN – With this being banged out on the keyboard on a rainy Friday morning, we don’t know yet who the Cincinnati Bengals will select on Day 2 of the NFL Draft – those picks will be on Friday night – but we do know who they chose in Round One on Thursday.

That would be Texas A&M DE Shemar Stewart, and most NFL observers are giving a huge thumbs down on the choice. At least, the Bengals are trying to improve their woeful defense, but their recent draft history suggests Stewart will be another reach. For a suspected edge rusher, his stats as an Aggie are abysmal, and Cincy is putting a lot of pressure on new defensive coordinator Al Golden to motivate Stewart and get the underachiever to reach his supposed potential.

It will be interesting to see who the Bengals select with their five remaining picks, but that isn’t nearly enough to fix their wretched defense. The hope may remain that the team can reach the playoffs by winning most of their games 42-41.

Good luck with that.

*****

DIAZ ON WAY OUT – It is apparent that former Cincinnati Reds closer Alexis Diaz will not be the team’s closer anytime soon.

Look for a trade or a demotion to occur in the near future for the 28-year-old.

Diaz, whose rapid rise earned him a spot on the All-Star team in 2023, hasn’t been the same pitcher since, and his latest adventure on the mound as especially concerning. That was Monday night, when he had trouble finding the strike zone against the Miami Marlins. Diaz also was victimized by the running game, allowing five stolen bases due to his slow delivery to the plate. He also gave up three hits, including a 3-run home run, walked a batter, and hit another in his 1 1/3 inning stint.

A change of scenery may be beneficial, and you can bet manager Terry Francona will not be sending him out in a close game anytime soon.

***** DERBY ONE WEEK AWAY – We will have more to say about the 151st Kentucky Derby next week, but I noticed several interesting names appearing in next Saturday’s Run for the Roses.

Among some of the early favorites, there is the winner of the Arkansas Derby, Sandman. I am also intrigued by Journalism, the winner of the Santa Anita Derby. (You gotta love that name if you do what I attempt to do.)

Other top picks include the Blue Grass Stakes winner, Burnham Square, ridden by last year’s winning jockey, Brian Hernandez Jr., Bob Baffert’s entry Rodriguez, the winner of the Wood Memorial Stakes, and Tiztastic, who won the Louisiana Derby.

A personal favorite will be a likely longshot, Owen Almighty. He did not have a good run in the Blue Grass, finishing sixth, but I

may just wager a dollar or two on him anyway. I feel like it’s a requirement, with that name. If you don’t already know, Owen just happens to be the name of my 10-year-old grandson.

*****

“Once you realize that everyone is in the same boat, that everyone is just as insecure and childlike as everyone else, that all these jokers in D.C. ruining our world are just greedy kids grabbing for marbles – I think that realization means you’re an adult.” – Musician-singer-songwriter Conor Oberst

*****

“There are things about some professional athletes that I cannot stand – the pretense, the egos, the pomposity, the greed.” – Baseball Hall of Famer Ted Simmons

***** “There are some things that can beat smartness and foresight. Awkwardness and stupidity can. The best swordsman in the world doesn’t need to fear the second best swordsman in the world: no, the person for him to be afraid of is some ignorant antagonist who has never had a sword in his hand before; he doesn’t do the thing he ought to do, and so the expert isn’t prepared for him.” – Mark Twain



Link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

NIL

Tennessee Baseball lost four payers to transfer portal on Friday

Four Tennessee baseball names surfaced in the NCAAA transfer portal Friday morning, bringing the total number of departures up to seven since the end of the 2025 campaign. Senior outfielder Colby Backus, sophomore right-handed pitcher Thomas Crabtree, redshirt-sophomore right-handed pitcher Austin Hunley and redshirt-freshman right-handed pitcher Brayden Sharp were the Vols who entered, joining pitcher […]

Published

on


Four Tennessee baseball names surfaced in the NCAAA transfer portal Friday morning, bringing the total number of departures up to seven since the end of the 2025 campaign.

Senior outfielder Colby Backus, sophomore right-handed pitcher Thomas Crabtree, redshirt-sophomore right-handed pitcher Austin Hunley and redshirt-freshman right-handed pitcher Brayden Sharp were the Vols who entered, joining pitcher Bryson Thacker and infielders Jack Jones and Robinson Martin who entered earlier in the week.

Backus, who may have one final year of eligibility due to the junior college waiver situation, played in 21 games this season for Tennessee, logging a .188 batting average with one run driven in. The Johnson City, Tenn. native spent three seasons on rocky Top and two seasons on the active roster, totaling five home runs on 13 RBI 15 hits with 23 runs scored. Backus was used primarily as a pinch hitter and defensive replacement throughout his Tennessee career.

Crabtree spent one season with the Vols after transferring up form the junior college ranks. The righty appeared in 12 games, accumulating a 2-0 record with a 3.00 ERA across 15.0 innings pitched. He struck out 20 batters, walked five and opponents registered a .151 batting average against him.   

Hunley, the younger brother of VFL Sean Hunley, combined to pitch 18.1 innings for Tennessee the past two seasons after redshirting in 2023 as a true freshman. The righty was 3-0 with a 4.42 ERA and 17 strikeouts to five walks with Tennessee.

Sharp, a two-way player for Tennessee, primarily focused on the mound his second year in the system. He appeared in eight games for the Vols this past season, totaling 15 strikeouts and five walks. In two seasons on the bump, sharp registered 11 appearances with a career ERA of 4.91. He also tallied seven career at-bats with Tennessee, scoring two runs.    

The 2025 non-graduate transfer portal opened on June 2 and will remain open until July 1. Players must have their name entered in the transfer portal by July 1 if they want to move on, but new destinations do not have to be made by that time.

Tennessee has added four players from the transfer portal thus far in the cycle and they are all right handed pitchers: Clay Edmondson (UNC Asheville), Mason Estrada (MIT), Bo Rhudy (Kennesaw State) and Brady Frederick (ETSU).



Link

Continue Reading

NIL

Changes sweeping NCAA sports don’t change everything

Resolution of the House v. NCAA settlement allows schools to distribute $20.5 million to athletes. This is the first time schools have been permitted to pay their athletes direct compensation. If you’re still arguing that a full-ride scholarship should be enough incentive for college kids to represent a school, that mom-and-pop operation on main street […]

Published

on


Resolution of the House v. NCAA settlement allows schools to distribute $20.5 million to athletes. This is the first time schools have been permitted to pay their athletes direct compensation.

If you’re still arguing that a full-ride scholarship should be enough incentive for college kids to represent a school, that mom-and-pop operation on main street no longer exists. It has been steamrolled by an enterprise that generates billions of dollars, and yes, the people who supply the labor and the entertainment deserve a cut of that ever-expanding pie.

I hear a familiar complaint often. That college sports have been ruined. That the free-for-all created by NIL has made things out of control. That they are done being fans.

Believe me, I feel that frustration and have concerns about how things will look and function, say, five years from now. Schools have a lot to sort out, starting with how they plan to pay for revenue-sharing every year.

The transfer portal has created more disruption to my passion for college sports than financial exchanges, though, obviously, athlete movement and money are intertwined.



Link

Continue Reading

NIL

UNC Baseball lands its shortstop of the future with this transfer portal addition

Featuring a veteran team during the 2025 season, it was well-known that the UNC baseball program had some work to do in the transfer portal this offseason. With a handful of roster voids due to players exhausting their eligibility (and potential MLB Draft picks), Scott Forbes and the Diamond Heels need to replenish that talent […]

Published

on

Featuring a veteran team during the 2025 season, it was well-known that the UNC baseball program had some work to do in the transfer portal this offseason.

With a handful of roster voids due to players exhausting their eligibility (and potential MLB Draft picks), Scott Forbes and the Diamond Heels need to replenish that talent by bringing in some transfers who can help that objective.

The shortstop position is a major need for North Carolina, given Alex Madera has exhausted his eligibility. Looking for its third starting shortstop in as many seasons, Forbes seems to have found his guy, securing a commitment from North Dakota State transfer Jake Schaffner.

A top-of-the-order caliber bat, Schaffner put together two very strong seasons at North Dakota State. Over 108 games played, the Janesville, Wisconsin native posted a .353 batting average, swiping 34 bases. Along with his elite ability to get on base (and eventually steal them), Schaffner provides a steady presence at shortstop, a defensive position that is extremely important for any baseball team.

North Carolina has now landed four transfers to help bolster next year’s squad. While the names aren’t necessarily ones that you often hear about, the Tar Heels have done a nice job in identifying talent that can transition to Chapel Hill nicely.

Let’s remember: guys like Alex Madera, Kane Kepley, and Tyson Bass (among others) are some of the transfer portal additions that made big-time noise for the Diamond Heels over the last few seasons.

The UNC baseball program isn’t looking to rebuild: they are looking to reload. Coming up just short of a trip to Omaha, the Diamond Heels are motivated to get back there, as Forbes and his staff will ensure that they field the best everyday lineup in order to accomplish that goal.

Adding Schaffner is an underrated move that has the potential of being a big-time addition for the UNC baseball program.

Continue Reading

NIL

Oregon Ducks’ Dante Moore Shares His Journey, Donates NIL Money To Hometown

Oregon Ducks quarterback Dante Moore is preparing to lead as the team’s starter in 2025. Before the season begins, Moore is demonstrating his leadership off the field, returning to his hometown in Detroit. One of the ways Moore sought to help is by using his Name, Image, and Likeness (NIL) earnings to help his alma […]

Published

on


Oregon Ducks quarterback Dante Moore is preparing to lead as the team’s starter in 2025. Before the season begins, Moore is demonstrating his leadership off the field, returning to his hometown in Detroit.

One of the ways Moore sought to help is by using his Name, Image, and Likeness (NIL) earnings to help his alma mater. Moore returned to Martin Luther King High School and donated a $10,000 check to the football team. 

The Oregon quarterback also hosted a book signing for his children’s book, “From Journey to Dream.” The book is about Moore’s journey from childhood to playing college football. Moore spent a season with the UCLA Bruins before transferring to Oregon where he sat for a season behind Cleveland Browns rookie quarterback Dillon Gabriel. 

Oct 14, 2023; Corvallis, Oregon, USA; UCLA Bruins quarterback Dante Moore (3) arrives prior to the game against the Oregon St

Oct 14, 2023; Corvallis, Oregon, USA; UCLA Bruins quarterback Dante Moore (3) arrives prior to the game against the Oregon State Beavers at Reser Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Soobum Im-Imagn Images / Soobum Im-Imagn Images

Moore hopes his book can help inspire those pursuing their dreams. He recounted his mistakes and that while things may not go as expected, it is a learning experience.

“I feel like this book will be good for kids just to read and understand,” Moore said at the book signing. 

Moore was originally committed to Oregon before flipping to UCLA. The flip was just another step in his journey to becoming the Ducks’ starter.

In Moore’s one season with UCLA, he passed for 1,610 yards, 11 touchdowns, and nine interceptions. He finished the season with a 53.5 completion percentage and entered the portal. Both Moore and Gabriel transferred to Oregon following the 2023 season. Gabriel became the starter, causing Moore to sit for a season. 

Oregon quarterback Dante Moore throws out a pass during warmups ahead of the Oregon Ducks’ Spring Game Saturday, April 27. 20

Oregon quarterback Dante Moore throws out a pass during warmups ahead of the Oregon Ducks’ Spring Game Saturday, April 27. 2024 at Autzen Stadium in Eugene, Ore. / Ben Lonergan/The Register-Guard / USA TODAY NETWORK

MORE: Five-Star Quarterback Ryder Lyons Visiting Oregon: Ducks Trending For Commitment?

MORE: Tampa Bay’s Todd Bowles Makes Bold Statement On Rookie Tez Johnson’s Speed, Playing Time

MORE: Cleveland Browns’ Myles Garrett Reveals First Impression Of ‘Composed’ Dillon Gabriel

Instead of holding a grudge and entering the portal again, Moore embraced the season as a learning experience.

“If you have a dream, chase it. Many people think the sky’s the limit, but I say reach for the stars,” Moore continued. “Many things don’t happen to go your way, I feel like you just learn from them. My freshman year at UCLA, a lot of mistakes happened there, but overall, I learned from them.”

“All these expectations and things like that, my work will show that any expectation or anything people expect me to do, I know I can do it,” Moore said.

Oregon Ducks quarterback Dante Moore throws out a pass during warm ups as the Oregon Ducks host the Idaho Vandals Saturday, A

Oregon Ducks quarterback Dante Moore throws out a pass during warm ups as the Oregon Ducks host the Idaho Vandals Saturday, Aug. 31, 2024 at Autzen Stadium in Eugene, Ore. / Ben Lonergan/The Register-Guard / USA TODAY NETWORK

There are high expectations for taking over as Oregon’s starting quarterback. Gabriel was a Heisman Trophy finalist and was selected by the Browns in the third round of the 2025 NFL Draft. The Ducks have produced two first-round quarterbacks since Los Angeles Chargers quarterback Justin Herbert was selected in the 2020 NFL Draft. After Herbert in 2020, the Denver Broncos selected former Ducks quarterback Bo Nix in the 2024 NFL Draft.

Oregon is coming off an undefeated regular season and was ranked the No. 1 team in the nation. Although the postseason did not go as Oregon would have wanted, losing against Ohio State in the Rose Bowl, the Ducks are expected to be back in the College Football Playoff in 2025.

“This year has been a learning year for me,” Moore told On3’s Pete Nakos. “Transferring in with Dillon was probably one of the best things I ever did. Coming to Oregon and competing with Dillon and standing behind him. I learned a lot from him. He’s been in college for quite some time, and I’m glad that the Browns picked him up.” 



Link

Continue Reading

NIL

Why female athletes are challenging the NCAA’s $2.8bn settlement | College sports

College athletes spent decades fighting for the right to make money from their name, image and likeness (NIL). In 2021, they won. Now, a $2.8bn NCAA settlement is set to compensate hundreds of thousands of current and former athletes who missed out on those earnings. But not everyone thinks the deal is fair. Eight female […]

Published

on


College athletes spent decades fighting for the right to make money from their name, image and likeness (NIL). In 2021, they won. Now, a $2.8bn NCAA settlement is set to compensate hundreds of thousands of current and former athletes who missed out on those earnings. But not everyone thinks the deal is fair.

Eight female athletes filed an appeal this week, arguing the agreement violates Title IX, the US law banning sex-based discrimination in education. They say the way the money is divided, largely favoring football and men’s basketball players, shortchanges women by more than $1bn.

Their appeal has paused all back payments, potentially delaying them for more than a year. However, the NCAA’s new plan to allow schools to pay current players directly starting 1 July will still go ahead.

So what does this all mean for athletes as well as the future of college sports? Here’s what’s going on …


What is the NCAA settlement about?

The NCAA agreed to pay $2.8bn to compensate athletes who were previously barred from earning income off their name, image, and likeness (NIL), including things like video game appearances, jersey sales, or social media sponsorships. The settlement covers athletes going back to 2016.

It also clears the way for a major change: beginning 1 July 2025, colleges will be allowed to directly share revenue with current players, up to $20.5 million per school per year.

It’s a major shift from the NCAA’s traditional amateurism model, which argued that athletes should only be compensated with scholarships, not salaries or endorsement income.


Who’s appealing the deal and why?

Eight female athletes who competed in soccer, volleyball, and track have filed an appeal. Their names include Kacie Breeding (Vanderbilt) and Kate Johnson (Virginia), along with six athletes from the College of Charleston.

They argue the deal violates Title IX, the federal law that bans sex-based discrimination in education. Specifically, they say the settlement gives up to 90% of the money to men in football and basketball, depriving women of $1.1bn in rightful compensation.


What is Title IX and how does it apply here?

Title IX is a 1972 US law requiring equal access and treatment for men and women in federally funded education programs, including athletics. Colleges must offer comparable resources, scholarships and participation opportunities across men’s and women’s sports.

The female athletes argue that since NIL bans affected both genders equally, compensation for those bans must also be equitable, and that using historical TV revenue (which favors men’s sports) ignores systemic barriers women have faced in marketing and media exposure.


What did the judge say about the Title IX argument?

US district judge Claudia Wilken approved the settlement last week and rejected Title IX-based objections, saying they fell outside the scope of the antitrust case. The female athletes disagree and are now asking the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals to intervene.

The UNC Tar Heels celebrate a December win against the Wake Forest Demon Deacons at WakeMed Soccer Park in Cary, North Carolina. Photograph: Ryan Hunt/Getty Images

What happens to the money in the meantime?

Because of the appeal, no back pay will be distributed until the court rules. That delay could last several months or longer. According to the NCAA’s lead attorney, the organization will continue funding the settlement pool, but the money will sit untouched until the case is resolved.


The current payout formula is based on historical media revenue and licensing data. Because football and men’s basketball generated the majority of money for schools – especially through TV contracts – those athletes stand to receive the most compensation.

Critics say that approach bakes in decades of inequality, because women were denied the same marketing exposure and investment in the first place.


What are the broader concerns about this settlement?

Some worry that schools will cut so-called “non-revenue” sports – like wrestling, swimming or gymnastics – to fund revenue-sharing with top athletes. Others fear this pushes college sports closer to a professional minor league system, undermining education and competitive balance. Still others say that without clear Title IX guidance, women may continue to be marginalized even in a post-amateurism era.


What happens next?

The Ninth Circuit will now review the appeal. Briefs are due by 3 October, and while both sides say they’ll push for speed, appeals in this court have been known to take 12 to 18 months.

Until the case is resolved, no back payments will be made to athletes who played between 2016 and 2021. But the revenue-sharing era is coming, whether or not the NCAA is ready for it.



Link

Continue Reading

NIL

Why female athletes are challenging the NCAA's $2.8bn settlement

College athletes spent decades fighting for the right to make money from their name, image and likeness (NIL). In 2021, they won. Now, a $2.8bn NCAA settlement is set to compensate hundreds of thousands of current and former athletes who missed out on those earnings. But not everyone thinks the deal is fair. Eight female […]

Published

on

Why female athletes are challenging the NCAA's $2.8bn settlement

College athletes spent decades fighting for the right to make money from their name, image and likeness (NIL). In 2021, they won. Now, a $2.8bn NCAA settlement is set to compensate hundreds of thousands of current and former athletes who missed out on those earnings. But not everyone thinks the deal is fair.

Eight female athletes filed an appeal this week, arguing the agreement violates Title IX, the US law banning sex-based discrimination in education. They say the way the money is divided, largely favoring football and men’s basketball players, shortchanges women by more than $1bn.

Their appeal has paused all back payments, potentially delaying them for more than a year. However, the NCAA’s new plan to allow schools to pay current players directly starting 1 July will still go ahead.

So what does this all mean for athletes as well as the future of college sports? Here’s what’s going on …


What is the NCAA settlement about?

The NCAA agreed to pay $2.8bn to compensate athletes who were previously barred from earning income off their name, image, and likeness (NIL), including things like video game appearances, jersey sales, or social media sponsorships. The settlement covers athletes going back to 2016.

It also clears the way for a major change: beginning 1 July 2025, colleges will be allowed to directly share revenue with current players, up to $20.5 million per school per year.

It’s a major shift from the NCAA’s traditional amateurism model, which argued that athletes should only be compensated with scholarships, not salaries or endorsement income.


Who’s appealing the deal and why?

Eight female athletes who competed in soccer, volleyball, and track have filed an appeal. Their names include Kacie Breeding (Vanderbilt) and Kate Johnson (Virginia), along with six athletes from the College of Charleston.

They argue the deal violates Title IX, the federal law that bans sex-based discrimination in education. Specifically, they say the settlement gives up to 90% of the money to men in football and basketball, depriving women of $1.1bn in rightful compensation.


What is Title IX and how does it apply here?

Title IX is a 1972 US law requiring equal access and treatment for men and women in federally funded education programs, including athletics. Colleges must offer comparable resources, scholarships and participation opportunities across men’s and women’s sports.

The female athletes argue that since NIL bans affected both genders equally, compensation for those bans must also be equitable, and that using historical TV revenue (which favors men’s sports) ignores systemic barriers women have faced in marketing and media exposure.


What did the judge say about the Title IX argument?

US district judge Claudia Wilken approved the settlement last week and rejected Title IX-based objections, saying they fell outside the scope of the antitrust case. The female athletes disagree and are now asking the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals to intervene.


What happens to the money in the meantime?

Because of the appeal, no back pay will be distributed until the court rules. That delay could last several months or longer. According to the NCAA’s lead attorney, the organization will continue funding the settlement pool, but the money will sit untouched until the case is resolved.


Why is most of the money going to men’s football and basketball players?

The current payout formula is based on historical media revenue and licensing data. Because football and men’s basketball generated the majority of money for schools – especially through TV contracts – those athletes stand to receive the most compensation.

Critics say that approach bakes in decades of inequality, because women were denied the same marketing exposure and investment in the first place.


What are the broader concerns about this settlement?

Some worry that schools will cut so-called “non-revenue” sports – like wrestling, swimming or gymnastics – to fund revenue-sharing with top athletes. Others fear this pushes college sports closer to a professional minor league system, undermining education and competitive balance. Still others say that without clear Title IX guidance, women may continue to be marginalized even in a post-amateurism era.


What happens next?

The Ninth Circuit will now review the appeal. Briefs are due by 3 October, and while both sides say they’ll push for speed, appeals in this court have been known to take 12 to 18 months.

Until the case is resolved, no back payments will be made to athletes who played between 2016 and 2021. But the revenue-sharing era is coming, whether or not the NCAA is ready for it.

Continue Reading

Most Viewed Posts

Trending