Connect with us
https://yoursportsnation.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/call-to-1.png

NIL

Details Emerging About Enforcement of the House Settlement

Last Updated on May 20, 2025 As college athletics prepares to transition into a new era post-House settlement, attention is turning toward how this new model will be enforced. Three major details are taking shape: the creation of a centralized College Sports Commission (CSC) with sweeping oversight powers, establishment of Deloitte’s clearinghouse to review deals, […]

Published

on

Details Emerging About Enforcement of the House Settlement

Last Updated on May 20, 2025

As college athletics prepares to transition into a new era post-House settlement, attention is turning toward how this new model will be enforced.

Three major details are taking shape: the creation of a centralized College Sports Commission (CSC) with sweeping oversight powers, establishment of Deloitte’s clearinghouse to review deals, and a contract circulated by power conferences aimed at binding their members to the terms of the settlement and NCAA rules—regardless of what state law might allow.

Here’s a breakdown of what we know so far and what it means for the future of college sports governance.

The NIL Clearinghouse Run by Deloitte

The House settlement introduces an NIL Clearinghouse operated by Deloitte called NIL Go, which will be owned by the new enforcement entity, CSC. This system is designed to evaluate third-party NIL deals valued at $600 or more, ensuring they reflect fair market value and serve a legitimate business purpose.

Under the new compliance framework, athletes will submit NIL deal information directly to their athletic department, which will designate a staff member —referred to as a “change champion”—to manage this process on campus and serve as the point person for facilitating NIL deal reviews and ensuring institutional compliance.

Schools must assess whether the payor qualifies as a booster, a collective, or a company with institutional ties. This classification hinges on several factors, including whether the entity was created to support the athletic department, has donated more than $50,000 to the school, or employs individuals with direct connections to the institution or its affiliates.

According to the settlement, only deals flagged as originating from boosters, collectives, or similar entities will be subject to this deeper review and valuation analysis through the Deloitte-run clearinghouse.

To make the “fair market value” determinations, Deloitte will be leveraging a database of thousands of past NIL deals involving both college and professional athletes to establish benchmarks. According to a three-page memo that’s been distributed to schools, Deloitte will use a 12-point analysis “assessing if compensation aligns with similarly situated individuals in comparable deals.” Factors listed in the memo include: “athletic performance, social media presence, local and institutional market size, and brand influence.”

Under the current plan, Deloitte is expected to review and render decisions on submitted NIL contracts within as little as one day. If a deal is rejected, the athlete will have the opportunity to revise and resubmit the deal to reflect Deloitte’s valuation.

If a deal is rejected a second time, it will be escalated to the CSC CEO and enforcement staff, and then funneled through a formal arbitration process overseen by the courts. Athletes will remain eligible while their case is under review, with arbitration decisions expected within 45 days. However, if an athlete loses arbitration and still accepts payment from a deal deemed out of bounds, they will be ruled ineligible.

Last week, at ACC spring meetings, Deloitte’s team shared data that 70% of past NIL deals from collectives would have been denied by their standards. Expect lawsuits as soon as Deloitte starts rejecting deals, which will force it to defend and reveal it’s “fair market value” formula.

Creation of the College Sports Commission

In order to enforce compliance with the revenue-sharing model, the clearinghouse decisions, and other elements of the House settlement, the NCAA and power conferences are establishing the CSC, a separate LLC that will be led by a to-be-hired CEO.

The CSC will have the authority to:

  • Oversee and interpret the application of new rules developed as part of the House settlement structure
  • Investigate violations of revenue-sharing rules and other agreed-upon settlement terms
  • Levy penalties for non-compliance, which could include fines, suspensions, penalties and other sanctions (these have not yet been detailed)

Sources told ESPN that schools will be able to challenge any penalties through an arbitration process. A potential huge change, however, may be subpoena power during the discovery process. This is a key element that has been missing from NCAA investigations in the past.

The CSC will be independent from the NCAA enforcement staff and led by a CEO in an effort to lend more credibility and transparency to how the new system is policed. The intent is to avoid the inconsistency and slow enforcement processes that have plagued the NCAA in recent years. The NCAA will continue to handle enforcement around other rules like academics and eligibility.

A Contract Binding Schools to the New Enforcement Rules

The latest development is a contract that the power conferences—Big Ten, SEC, Big 12, ACC, and potentially others opting into the settlement—are asking their member institutions to sign. Ross Dellenger reports this contract is essentially a binding agreement that reinforces the terms of the settlement and NCAA rules, even in states where laws might allow schools to sidestep those regulations.

Here’s what’s reportedly included:

  • Commitment to follow NCAA and conference rules, even when those rules are more restrictive than state laws.
  • Enforceable penalties for institutions that break the rules, including financial penalties, loss of revenue-sharing eligibility, and even competitive sanctions.
  • A formal dispute resolution process, meant to streamline internal enforcement and reduce the need for litigation between schools and conferences.

The goal of the contract is clear: prevent a patchwork of compliance standards that could arise in states with more permissive laws for NIL and revenue sharing. Without a unifying agreement, schools in restrictive states could find themselves at a competitive disadvantage compared to schools in states that allow more direct compensation or looser NIL arrangements.

Dellenger reports schools who refuse to sign are risking loss of their conference membership and ability to compete against other power conference programs. However, questions remain about the legality of signing a document that asks you to not follow your state law, as those laws override private agreements. Tennessee’s new law, for example, prohibits the adoption of rules that violate state law and prohibit punishment that would impact a school’s membership status or revenue distribution.

As with everything surrounding the House settlement, the answers are still unfolding around all three of these new mechanisms.

  • Kristi Dosh

    Kristi A. Dosh is the founder of BusinessofCollegeSports.com and has served as a sports business analyst and contributor for outlets such as Forbes, ESPN, SportsBusiness Journal, Bleacher Report, SB Nation and more. She is also the author of a book on the business of college football, Saturday Millionaires. Kristi is a sought-after consultant and speaker on topics related to the business of college sports and a former practicing attorney. Click to learn more

    View all posts

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

NIL

Johnny Manziel thinks he would have stayed in college over the NFL ‘no matter what’ with NIL

Johnny Manziel truly believes he would’ve stayed in college football at Texas A&M in the NIL era, rather than go to the NFL as early as he did. Following two years as a starter, Manziel declared for the NFL Draft and was a first round pick by the Cleveland Browns in 2014. However, his NFL […]

Published

on


Johnny Manziel truly believes he would’ve stayed in college football at Texas A&M in the NIL era, rather than go to the NFL as early as he did. Following two years as a starter, Manziel declared for the NFL Draft and was a first round pick by the Cleveland Browns in 2014.

However, his NFL career quickly flamed out and he had stints in the CFL a few years later, as well as Fan Controlled Football, an arena league. But, the former Heisman Trophy winner has been open and honest about his post-collegiate struggles on and off the field but has his moments where it’s fun to play the hypothetical game.

Just imagine Manziel, at the peak of his collegiate powers, rolling in the NIL dollars. And then coming back to Texas A&M on top of it? Oh man.

“I mean, I think no matter what, being in the NIL era, if that would have, you know, been the equivalent of 2013, I would have stayed no matter what,” Manziel said on Always College Football. “Just because, you know, a couple million bucks in College Station goes a really, really long way. And, you go to the NFL, or a first round pick, you know, you sign for $10 million or whatever it is, you know, that’s the two years that I had remaining at Texas A&M, to be able to make (that) through NIL. So I think, for me, when I think back about it now, I definitely, if there would have been any real money involved, I definitely would have stayed no matter what.”

This isn’t the first time Manziel alluded to more time in College Station. He spoke to fellow Heisman winner Matt Leinart about the topic back in December with NIL being such commonplace across college athletics.

“Yeah, I think so, just because, I mean, you know, you get into your rookie contract if you’re not taken  high enough, I mean, you know, I could have stayed two more years in college and probably made what I made throughout the four years of your NFL deal for the most part,” Manziel said. “So I think it would have given me the opportunity to still be at a place today and then like that, be able to make money and be able to, you know, still continue to go play the college football life. It’s tough for me looking back, having left two years of eligibility on a table.”

Manziel burst onto the college football scene in 2012 when he became the first freshman to ever win the Heisman Trophy. That year, he threw for 3,706 yards and 26 touchdowns to help the Aggies to an 11-2 record. 

Along the way, he set multiple records, including one against Arkansas when he had 557 yards of total offense. That broke Archie Manning’s record, and Manziel broke his own mark just two games later with 576 yards of offense in a single game. As a redshirt sophomore in 2013, Manziel threw for 4,114 yards and 37 touchdowns as he finished fifth in the Heisman voting.



Link

Continue Reading

NIL

Vanderbilt football coach on revenue sharing vs NIL

Martel Hight will play both ways in 2025: Clark Lea Here’s what Clark Lea said about Martel Hight’s potential as a two-way player for Vanderbilt football in 2025. ATLANTA – Just a few years after NIL and instant eligibility for transfers upended the college football world, programs must adjust again. The recent House settlement implemented […]

Published

on


play

ATLANTA – Just a few years after NIL and instant eligibility for transfers upended the college football world, programs must adjust again.

The recent House settlement implemented revenue sharing, where schools pay players directly rather than them signing contracts with a collective. There’s a cap on how much revenue sharing money schools can give out, split across all sports. NIL deals can still exist, but they must go through a clearinghouse run by Deloitte called NIL Go.

On top of that, football teams can give out scholarships to anyone on their roster, but rosters will be capped at 105. Some players, called Designated Student Athletes, can be grandfathered in during the first few years of the roster limits if they were previously on the team.

Vanderbilt football coach Clark Lea was slow to adapt to the original NIL and transfer rules, but he believes he’s better prepared this time around. If anything, he said, the new rules make roster-building more straightforward.

“I don’t want to say it’s a seamless transition, because it’s a transition,” Lea said in a session with local media at SEC media days on July 14. “We’re going from contracts written through a collective to now having those as part of the revenue share salary cap. And so we have to transition to those contracts in a way that keeps up moving without skipping a beat.

” … There is no room for a team in our league that’s not fully participating. From there, it becomes, how do we engage the Nashville community to go beyond the revenue share? And I’m excited to explore all those things to better position us for where the game is headed.”

To engage the Nashville community, Lea said he saw opportunities for partnerships with local businesses that could sign Vanderbilt players to NIL deals above the revenue-sharing cap. Lea said he was not directly involved with those conversations, as he was better off focusing on football, but that other parts of the department were focused on taking advantage of those opportunities.

The Commodores have a higher profile going into 2025 than they’ve had in a while with returning quarterback Diego Pavia and tight end Eli Stowers, plus several other good players. Martel Hight could play offense, defense and special teams.

But there are still questions abounding. NIL Go has rejected several NIL deals, leaving teams uncertain about the level of enforcement that will take place.

Lea and Vanderbilt, like everyone else, will have to figure out those things as they go.

Aria Gerson covers Vanderbilt athletics for The Tennessean. Contact her at agerson@gannett.com or on X @aria_gerson.





Link

Continue Reading

NIL

Brian Kelly endorses the possibility of Nick Saban returning to college football

Nick Saban and his potential return to coaching college football has become a trending topic at SEC Media Days. LSU head coach Brian Kelly is hoping it comes to fruition. The fuse was lit by former Alabama quarterback Greg McElroy on McElroy and Cubelic in the Morning, when he relayed that he’s heard someone predict the legendary leader will return to […]

Published

on

Brian Kelly endorses the possibility of Nick Saban returning to college football

Nick Saban and his potential return to coaching college football has become a trending topic at SEC Media Days. LSU head coach Brian Kelly is hoping it comes to fruition.

The fuse was lit by former Alabama quarterback Greg McElroy on McElroy and Cubelic in the Morning, when he relayed that he’s heard someone predict the legendary leader will return to coaching at some point. He cited a “very much in the know person” thinks Saban will get back to the sidelines.

McElroy continued to hammer home the idea with SEC Network analyst Paul Finebaum. Saban currently works as an analyst for ESPN, but he’s not part of SEC Network’s coverage of SEC Media Days in Atlanta and is not in attendance this week.

As the story makes its rounds in Georgia, Kelly was asked about a potential return to the sport for Saban. It’s something the Tigers leader would sign up for, believing college football as a whole is better when Saban is on the sidelines.

“It’d be better for college football if Nick Saban is coaching. Period,” Kelly told On3’s Alex Byington. “There’s nobody better to develop players and certainly build championship programs, but at the same time understanding how to do it and how to do it the right way. It’d be a great day if he was back in it.”

While it may seem a bit far fetched, McElroy is beating the drum, and Kelly is hoping for the best. The former Crimson Tide signal-caller did point out it was someone “notable” who told him they think Saban isn’t necessarily done coaching. In fact, he said the person was “adamant.”

“This is a little bit out of left field, but the question was asked of me … a very much in the know person that I have a lot of respect for and have spent a lot of time around and just really, really admire,” McElroy said. “They seem to think Nick Saban’s not done coaching. I had a similar reaction. He’s pretty adamant that he thinks Nick Saban will be coaching again. … Look, if it wasn’t someone notable, I’d never say a word.”

Before the hype train leaves the station, Finebaum did rain on the parade a bit, responding with a resounding, “No” when McElroy asked if he “bought” the speculation. The former Alabama quarterback agreed with him, and Finebaum pointed out the life the legendary coach is living – including his improving golf game.

Stranger things have happened though. Brian Kelly wouldn’t mind the competition if Nick Saban decided to return. A rising tide lifts all boats. It’s certainly something to keep an eye on moving forward.

— On3’s Nick Schultz contributed to this article.

Continue Reading

NIL

New House proposal could reign in NIL chaos in college athletics

A new bill introduced in the House of Representatives calls for regulation in college athletics as leaders search for answers in the new era of Name, Image and Likeness. The SCORE Act, introduced to the House last week, aims to provide the NCAA with antitrust protections, pre-emption of state laws that regulate NIL payments and […]

Published

on


A new bill introduced in the House of Representatives calls for regulation in college athletics as leaders search for answers in the new era of Name, Image and Likeness.

The SCORE Act, introduced to the House last week, aims to provide the NCAA with antitrust protections, pre-emption of state laws that regulate NIL payments and a ban on making student athletes employees of their schools, according to a report from the Associated Press.

The bill comes on the heels of the House settlement, instituted on July 1. Schools can now share up to $20.5 million directly to players this year in a revenue share model. Additionally, the NCAA is set to pay $2.8 billion to current and former athletes for use of their NIL.

Seven republicans and two democrats are listed as co-sponsors of the SCORE Act, which primarily intends to impose national standards on NIL payments that continue to rise in the aftermath of the settlement.

If passed, the bill will also ban schools from using “athletic fees” imposed on students to fund athletic departments. Schools like Clemson, Tennessee and Arkansas have already implemented similar costs this year.

As football and basketball are set to receive the majority of the $20.5 million revenue-share cap, non-revenue sports would be protected by the SCORE Act, in part, by a requirement on schools to maintain at least 16 sports if one coach makes more than $250,000 a year.

According to the report, the bill has a “fair chance” at passing in the House but a “slim” chance of pasisng in the Senate, where the SCORE Act would need at least seven Democratic votes.



Link

Continue Reading

NIL

Texas Tech hoping big money and top transfers lead to unprecedented payback in football | Football

FRISCO, Texas (AP) — Texas Tech coach Joey McGuire had already completed his portion of Big 12 football media days when Colorado’s Deion Sanders was asked if he has been paying attention to what the Red Raiders did in the transfer portal. The gist of that question was really about all the money for Texas […]

Published

on


FRISCO, Texas (AP) — Texas Tech coach Joey McGuire had already completed his portion of Big 12 football media days when Colorado’s Deion Sanders was asked if he has been paying attention to what the Red Raiders did in the transfer portal.

The gist of that question was really about all the money for Texas Tech athletes, which is widely reported to be around $55 million for the upcoming school year. A significant chunk of that is expected to go toward the transformation of a football program that has never won a Big 12 title or even had a 10-win season since 2008, six years before three-time Super Bowl champion quarterback Patrick Mahomes played his first game for the Red Raiders.

“Yeah, Joey got some money. Joey, where you at, baby? Spending that money, I love it,” Sanders said emphatically about the fellow Big 12 coach he calls a friend, and who coached two of his three sons in high school. “I love you, man. I appreciate you. Can you send a few of those dollars to us so we can get some of those players too?”

The reported dollar figures are staggering, even in these early days of schools being able to pay athletes directly. That total supposedly includes the maximum $20.5 million of revenue each school can share with players under the NCAA’s landmark House settlement that took effect this month, meaning the rest would come through name, image and likeness deals.

Red Raiders spending big

Last fall, Texas Tech said it was budgeting $14.7 million for the fiscal year — about $9 million more than the previous year — in support for the athletic program, which had a budget of nearly $129 million. The headlines started to come soon after.

Tech’s softball team had never won a Big 12 regular-season or tournament championship before standout pitcher NiJaree Canady arrived last year in Lubbock with a NIL deal that made her the first $1 million softball player.

With Canady, who had been to the previous two Women’s College World Series with Stanford, the Red Raiders won both of those league titles and got all the way to the final game of this year’s WCWS before losing to rival Texas.

Canady has already signed a similar NIL deal for next season. Tech also added three top transfers: Florida second baseman Mia Williams; two-time 20-game winner Kaitlyn Terry from UCLA; and Missouri Valley Conference player of the year Jackie Lis, an infielder from Southern Illinois.

Along with all the money spent on players, Texas Tech this spring unveiled a $240 million football complex at Jones AT&T Stadium, where Cody Campbell Field is named after the former offensive lineman who made a $25 million donation to the project.

Campbell’s financial impact on the program goes well beyond that. He is chairman of the school’s Board of Regents, a billionaire who with his oil and gas partner John Sellers co-founded The Matador Club, the school’s NIL collective that is now under the umbrella of the athletic department’s Red Raider Club. Sellers and Campbell earlier this year sold some subsidies of an oil and natural gas company for about $4 billion.

Last week, Campbell announced the launch of a nonprofit called Saving College Sports to help solve a “crisis” as the industry “faces an existential turning point as legal, governance and economic challenges threaten” hundreds of thousands of athletes, fandom and the economies of campus communities.

On the gridiron

The Texas Tech men’s basketball program has four Sweet 16 appearances since 2018, including a run to the national title game in 2019. But the big moneymaker for all programs is football and the Red Raiders will find out this fall if a big financial commitment to those players will get them into the 12-team College Football Playoff.

Texas Tech brought in 22 football transfers in what many consider a top national portal class. Most are highly touted players, with about half expected to be starters and most of the others impact players on a team already with several key returners after going 8-5 last year in McGuire’s third season.

“Yeah, it’s been a fun offseason,” McGuire said before Sanders took the podium. “We were really aggressive whenever it came to the portal and meeting some of our needs for the football team. … I think this conference is really strong. There’s a lot of teams that have some big opportunities this year to really make a statement, and we’re planning on being one of them.”

With the amount of money involved, some front-loaded NIL deals before the House settlement with new guidelines went into effect, it will certainly be a huge and expensive disappointment if they are not.

“I understand how important this year is,” McGuire said. “We’ve got to have a lot of things go right, but everybody does. You’ve got to keep your quarterback healthy. You’ve got to play at a high level. I know there’s a lot of expectations. My job that I’m going to really try to do is keep the pressure on me and the coaches.”

Tech returns senior quarterback Behren Morton, who threw for 2,976 yards and 25 touchdowns last season, and senior linebacker Jacob Rodriguez, the league’s top tackler with 126 last year. Rodriguez is the preseason Big 12 defensive player of the year, and on the league’s preseason team with a pair of four-star transfers: edge rusher David Bailey (Stanford) and defensive lineman Lee Hunter (UCF).

“It’s unbelievable, those guys came in and bought in to what we were talking about,” Rodriguez said. “I love those guys to death already and I think they’re going to make my job a lot easier, especially with the guys we have up front.”

It will also be up to McGuire to deal with paid players, some making significantly more than others on the roster.

“I think that goes into your culture,” the former Texas high school coach said. “It’s real. It’s real money. Guys are making different amounts of money in the locker room.

“One thing that you better understand if you dream to play in the NFL, your contract’s not going to be the same as the guy next to you, and if that’s what you focus on, then you’re going to spend a lot of time wasting a lot of energy,” McGuire said. “If guys want to increase that, focus on what you can control. That’s your game and how hard you’re practicing and how hard you’re playing.”


AP Sports Writer Schuyler Dixon contributed.


AP college football: https://apnews.com/hub/college-football



Link

Continue Reading

NIL

Incoming Virginia Tech men’s basketball star uses filthy move that should fire up fans

It has been some time since the Virginia Tech men’s basketball program has had some hype surrounding an incoming freshman. In fact, this season, there is a real chance that when all is said and done next June, veteran coach Mike Young could be looking at having a pair of draft picks in the 2026 […]

Published

on


It has been some time since the Virginia Tech men’s basketball program has had some hype surrounding an incoming freshman. In fact, this season, there is a real chance that when all is said and done next June, veteran coach Mike Young could be looking at having a pair of draft picks in the 2026 NBA Draft on his 2025-26 roster.

Those two players would be Tobi Lawal and incoming freshman Neoklis Avdalas, both of whom entered the NBA Draft process this spring, but withdrew to play another year of college basketball. Lawal, who transferred to Virginia Tech from VCU last season, will play his second season for Young, while Avdalas gave a verbal commitment to the Hokies and then signed after withdrawing. He is not on campus yet as he is playing in the FIBA Eurobasket U20 with Greece, and he had a move that should fire up Tech fans for next season.

Virginia Tech incoming freshman Neoklis Avdalas drops a filthy move in a FIBA matchup

If there is one thing that is clear about Avdalas, it’s that he has the opportunity to be a special player at Virginia Tech. Expect him to be able to play multiple positions for the Hokies, and that even includes handling the ball as the point guard. He had a play against Lithuania that Hokies fans hope to see next winter in Blacksburg: a filthy crossover.

That was certainly a filthy move by Avdalas and Virginia Tech fans are hoping that they see that a few times next winter. One thing is clear, Avdalas has multiple ways he can score the ball and that is something Hokies fans have seen a lot of. The Hokies are going to have multiple options on offense next season, but Avdalas might very well end up being their best option. It almost seems too good to be true.





Link

Continue Reading

Most Viewed Posts

Trending