Connect with us
https://yoursportsnation.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/call-to-1.png

Sports

Draft grades for all 32 teams – Field Level Media – Professional sports content solutions

Published

on


Tennessee Titans

Grade: B+

Best Pick: QB Cameron Ward, No. 1 Overall

What We Liked: An all-around good draft for the Titans, who are putting together a crack offense in an attempt to actually win some games this year. Ward was the clear QB1 this year. His confidence and ability to handle lots of responsibilities will make the lives of his coordinators easier. Wide receiver Elic Ayomanor (No. 136) and tight end Gunnar Helm (No. 120) will be great support for Ward and provide reliable hands to help him get his rhythm going at the professional level. Safety Kevin Winston Jr. (No. 82) headlines the defensive picks for me. Though he was injured last year, he gave his all in 2023 and kept a day three slot because of it.

Not Sure About: I’m still not convinced Oluwafemi Oladejo (No. 52) is a real edge rusher. He just feels like a square peg being pushed into a round hole. I’ve mentioned the idea of “positionless defenses” but this guy has a position: It’s just not the one he’s playing at the moment. It also felt like a stretch to take wide receiver Chimere Dike (No. 103) in the fourth round, another speedster who does not do a lot else to provide value to the team.

Jacksonville Jaguars

Grade: B

Best Pick: CB/WR Travis Hunter, No. 2 Overall

What We Liked: That Travis Hunter trade was incredible. Getting two top-end weapons for the price of one is worth any amount of pick capital you have to pay to get up there. James Gladstone is making an incredible splash in his first year as a general manager with this trade and did lots of draft maneuvering that worked to his advantage. The pickup of guard Wyatt Milum (No. 89) solidifies the offensive line well, and running back Bhayshul Tuten (No. 104) should be a really strong dynamic duo with Tank Bigsby to take pressure off Trevor Lawrence.

Not Sure About: Hmm, lots of announcing guys who aren’t going to play the
position they did in college, shifting over to somewhere else. Caleb Ransaw (No. 88) played all slot corner last year and is looking to be used at safety; Jalen McLeod (No. 194) got announced as a linebacker when his natural fit is as an edge rusher; and Milum is likely shifting from tackle to guard. If these guys don’t do well at their next position, the Jaguars’ depth class is pretty much toast.

New York Giants

Grade: C-

Best Pick: Edge Abdul Carter, No. 3 Overall

What we liked: Carter is a great player. Pairing him with Brian Burns will turn a middling edge rusher unit into a force to be reckoned with. Focusing on the defensive trenches was a good decision for the Giants, who despite having lots of talent, really only felt like they were getting halfway decent results. Picking up defensive tackle Darius Alexander (No. 65) to supplement Dexter Lawrence should play out well, too. That defense could easily become a top-10 unit next year with the added talent.

Not Sure About: I know when you see a guy who could be a franchise quarterback on the board, you should do anything to get him, but is Jaxson Dart (No. 25) really that guy? Not only did the Giants take a quarterback propped up by an incredibly friendly system, they traded up to get him. After the first read, Dart often crumbled. I’m not sure I can see a world where Dart takes the Giants any further than Daniel Jones did. At least Jones could push the ball all the way downfield.

New England Patriots

Grade: A+

Best Pick: C Jared Wilson, No. 95 Overall

What We Liked: Lots of rock-solid picks building in Mike Vrabel’s first year as the head coach. The offensive line is molding into more of a unit than a
series of disparate parts, the Patriots have a new running back in TreVeyon
Henderson (No. 38) who can hopefully carry the workload. Wide receiver Kyle Williams (No. 69) gives quarterback Drake Maye one more weapon. This feels like a draft driven by logic and smart team-building.

Not Sure About: It was a little early for safety Craig Woodson (No. 106) for my liking. Woodson has trouble run-stopping and struck me as more of a developmental player than a solution to a safety problem. Other than that, nothing to complain about.

Cleveland Browns:

Grade: B

Best Pick: Harold Fannin Jr., No. 67 Overall

What We Liked: Lots of talented guys made their way onto the Browns roster through this class. It’s a very productive group that isn’t lacking in potential. Defensive tackle Mason Graham (No. 5) plays with a fury that should scare opponents, the new running back duo of Quinshon Judkins (No. 36) and Dylan Sampson (No. 126) has a lot of athleticism and should create a nice one-two punch. Fannin adds a dynamic weapon to the receiving corps that can be used in a wealth of ways. The support system for whoever is playing quarterback is going to be boosted.

Not Sure About: There’s an old adage that if you have two quarterbacks, you have no quarterbacks. Forcing a Dillon Gabriel (No. 94) vs. Shedeur Sanders (No. 144) quarterback competition seems like a move that will ultimately cause distractions. It’s classic Browns, never able to quite solve the quarterback problem as they intend to, and always with more drama than necessary. Carson Schwesinger (No. 33) also got taken a little early for my liking, but the value at linebacker in the second round wasn’t there for anyone.

Las Vegas Raiders:

Grade: A+

Best Pick: RB Ashton Jeanty, No. 6 Overall

What We Liked: The Raiders got a blue-chip guy at six, hard to argue with
that. Jeanty is a big-time impact player for a team that never really had an
offense that chugged. However, one great pick does not make an A+ draft
class. The Raiders knocked it out of the park with virtually every pick. Their
new wide receiver room combines high-floor prospects like Jack Bech (No. 58) with big-upside swings like Dont’e Thornton Jr. (No. 108). Their two offensive linemen picks are both big-time athletes who could start early. Darien Porter (No. 68) may be old for a draft pick, but he’s the perfect Pete Carroll corner. Raiders fans, get excited.

Not Sure About: The two late defensive tackle picks don’t really have any
special skills and have limited upside. I would expect them to be rotational
players at best. If JJ Pegues (No. 180) starts getting reps at fullback, then get worried about these being wasted picks. I personally would have added a safety earlier, but that’s a nitpick on a top-tier draft class.

New York Jets

Grade: B

Best Pick: OT Armand Membou, No. 7 Overall

What We Liked: The Jets hit home runs with their first three selections. Membou can bring his athleticism to an offensive line that really needed only one more piece and create a rushing powerhouse for quarterback Justin Fields and running back Breece Hall. Tight end Mason Taylor (No. 42) sets Fields up with a quick dump-off weapon and with with good run-after-catch ability. Cornerback Azareye’h Thomas (No. 73) does great work in both zone and man and should quickly become part of the rotation. It’s now up to the free agent class to make it work.

Not Sure About: The day three selections were nothing to write home about. Wide receiver Arian Smith (No. 110) is very fast, but when it’s not game-breaking and it’s your main trait, it’s hard to be too impressed. Safety Malachi Moore is also a good athlete, but he doesn’t quite have the mental finesse to keep pass-catchers in his view consistently. Linebacker Francisco Mauigoa (No. 162) is good, but where will he play?

Carolina Panthers

Grade: B+

Best Pick: Edge Nic Scourton, No. 51 Overall

What We Liked: Getting two edge rushers (Scourton and Princely Umanmielen at No. 77) feels like a great maneuver to fill out the room. Especially adding Scourton to the mix, a crazy good power rusher whose hands will make waste to offensive lines across the southeast. The Panthers hit on all of their day three picks as well, especially Lathan Ransom (No. 122) and Cam Jackson (No. 140), who can make an immediate impact at safety and nose tackle. The depth on the team just got a lot stronger.

Not Sure About: It feels like the Panthers already have a lot of tall wideouts who can’t really separate consistently. Tetairoa McMillan (No. 8) does not add much to the room that quarterback Bryce Young doesn’t already have. Umanmielen doesn’t move me as an edge rusher, and while he isn’t a bad value in the third round, it doesn’t strengthen their bid for the NFC South. Running back might have been a higher priority.

New Orleans Saints

Grade: D

Best Pick: OT Kelvin Banks, No. 9 Overall

What We Liked: Banks is a good tackle who fits the mauling mold the Saints seem to look for. He feels a lot like Trevor Penning, but with more experience facing NFL talent and less frenzy. Jonas Sanker (No. 93) can fill a safety slot once their older guys age out, and he’s versatile enough where you can evaluate his strengths and slot a new guy in next to him pretty easily. Quincy Riley (No. 131) adds some speed to the cornerback room.

Not Sure About: Taking Tyler Shough (No. 40) is just begging to have the Brandon Weeden experience for yourself. If this is your plan at quarterback, you’ll be taking another big swing in 2026. It’s not like they have given him any support this year either. If the Saints had given him an earlier wideout, then perhaps it could be fine, but if the injuries return, it honestly could be an 0-17 season.

Chicago Bears:

Grade: A-

Best Pick: OT Ozzy Trapilo, No. 56 Overall

What We Liked: The Bears kept a good balance of need and overall player
value for much of the draft. Starting off with tight end Colston Loveland (No. 10) was a welcome surprise, as much of the buzz was around the inferior (sorry) Tyler Warren. Continuing to support Caleb Williams, the next two picks were another weapon in wide receiver Luther Burden III, who can really cook with the ball in his hands, and added protection from Trapilo. Their defensive picks mostly landed as well with defensive tackle Shemar Turner (No. 62) and cornerback Zah Frazier (No. 169) being high-floor prospects with decent athleticism and physicality.

Not Sure About: That pick of linebacker Ruben Hyppolite (No. 132) was an insane miscue. It was sort of like acing a history test and then writing gibberish on one of the essay questions. Does anyone outside of the Maryland fan base and obsessive pro day watchers like myself even know who Hyppolite is? Surely they could have gotten him later. The Bears don’t even really need a linebacker, which means they must have really loved this guy. Very odd pick from an otherwise very logical set of selections.

San Francisco 49ers:

Grade: C

Best Pick: LB Nick Martin, No. 75 Overall

What We Liked: Coach Mike Shanahan found some very good value outside of the first round. Martin was vastly underrated after getting injured early in the season, but he should bring sideline-to-sideline range that he couples with great instincts. Jordan Watkins (No. 138) has WR1 upside but at the very least projects as a WR2 for the offense. He was almost an Emeka Egbuka type in college who kept getting pushed by really impressive talents and not given a chance to shine.

Not Sure About: The first two rounds made me shrug. Edge Mykel Williams (11) is better on paper than on the field, but this isn’t a Strat-O-Matic game. Defensive tackle Alfred Collins (43) doesn’t have the strength or agility to be a game-wrecker, so the whole defensive line feels stagnant. There’s still a glaring hole at offensive tackle that needs more capital investment.

Dallas Cowboys:

Grade: C+

Best Pick: CB Shavon Revel Jr., No. 76 Overall

What We Liked: The Revel pick was impressive value for the spot. The once-incredible Cowboys cornerback room took a major step back, and Ravel should be able to make it afloat again. Guard Tyler Booker (No. 12) is a really good player who fits with the scheme of the Cowboys with his overwhelming power profile. The Cowboys addressed the majority of their needs and at least should have new competition at the spot.

Not Sure About: Can edge Donovan Ezeiruaku (No. 44) keep up his high production in the pros when he’s at an athletic disadvantage? The value is better in the second than his first-round projection, but it still is a worrying projection. Running back Jaydon Blue does not seem equipped to take on a bell cow role and feels like more of a special teams add.

Miami Dolphins:

Grade: C

Best Pick: DT Kenneth Grant, No. 13 Overall

What We Liked: Effort was made to replace the big-time players who have
left Miami for greener pastures. Grant is clearly meant to be the
next force up the middle, similar to how Christian Wilkins operated for the
Dolphins, and safety Dante Trader Jr. (No. 155) is kind of like if you got Jevon Holland from the 99-cent store: lots of strong play with a much lower paycheck attached. Guard Jonah Savaiinaea (No. 37) feels like one more step in the right direction to fixing an offensive line that has led to Tua Tagovailoa concussions. The needs are being addressed.

Not Sure About: Defensive tackle Jordan Phillips (No. 143) was a prospect that got first-round hype early in the cycle, but that tapered off when everyone realized that rumors of his athleticism were greatly exaggerated. Even the fifth round feels out of the range I would want someone of his production caliber. Cornerback Jason Marshall Jr. (No. 150) is a similar former high-upside project player who just never did much of anything. Miami needs some players who can actually make an impact —
outside of their offense, they lack star power.

Indianapolis Colts

Grade: B+

Best Pick: RB DJ Giddens, No. 151 Overall

What We Liked: The Chris Ballard strategy of taking exclusively pure athletes seems to have cooled off, as now Ballard is taking guys who also play good football. After a few years of middling draft classes, this is a group of guys you can feel confident in. Tight end Tyler Warren (No. 14) will provide more ways to ease Anthony Richardson’s quarterback responsibilities, and edge JT Tuimoloau (No. 45) and cornerback Justin Walley (No. 80) are good enough athletes but really excel in technical skill. The best pick, though, is Giddens in the fifth round. He has a balanced skill set that could make him a great supplement to Jonathan Taylor and even potentially be a full-time starter.

Not Sure About: Tim Smith seems to have been picked because he’s an Alabama defensive tackle. Really just another body for that rotation. I’m not
in love with the Warren pick, either. As dynamic as he was at the
college level, I’m not sure an offense can really be built around him in the pros without his athletic limitations showing through. Adding Riley Leonard (No. 189) to the quarterback room when he mostly just runs feels underwhelming for a team that’s sorely missing an actual passer.

Atlanta Falcons

Grade: B-

Best Pick: S Xavier Watts, No. 96 Overall

What we liked: The selections were impressive values in comparison to consensus. Edge Jalon Walker (No. 15) was seen by many as a potential top 10 pick thanks to his explosive nature; the testing numbers of edge James Pearce Jr. (No. 26) make his potential impressive, and getting Watts at the back half of day two after a slide could change their secondary. The values on these guys was impressive, and the Falcons betting on upside is a great choice in a weak division where any team could cement itself as the front-runner for the next five years. If these players pan out along with quarterback Michael Penix Jr., they could be a perennial playoff team.

Not Sure About: Trading up with a future first-round pick for a player at a position you already took in the top 15 feels like a poor use of resources. That defensive line certainly needed sprucing up, but it only matters so much if they’re not getting any interior pressure, and they certainly did not invest in defensive tackle as many expected. Not only that, they doubled up on doubling up. They took two safeties too! There are more holes on the roster than that! Solve your other problems!

Arizona Cardinals

Grade: A

Best Pick: CB Will Johnson, No. 47 Overall

What We Liked: Everything. The Cardinals went for the best football player available at every turn, from ending the surprising fall to the second round for cornerback Will Johnson (No. 47) to their first pick of Walter Nolen (No. 16), who got some of the best production of any defensive tackle in the SEC.

Even their day two and three selections were great choices, taking edge Jordan Burch (No. 78), who performed admirably at Oregon, and Cody Simon (No. 115), who led the linebacker corps for Ohio State. I had Burch as a top 50 guy, and Simon as one of the most underrated linebackers in the class. It solves a lot of problems for them very quickly.

Not Sure About: While these picks are great value, they all come with some caveats. Nolen has alleged character issues, Johnson has some grievous medical history, and Burch could accurately be described as a tweener. Plus, some earlier help for quarterback Kyler Murray would have been nice.

Cincinnati Bengals

Grade: B-

Best Pick: Edge Shemar Stewart, No. 17 Overall

What We Liked: Stewart has an impressive physical profile that should pair well with Trey Hendrickson coming off the line. The Bengals need a big splash after stagnating after their Super Bowl run, and they need more than a firecracker offense to get closer to the playoffs next year. Even their offensive additions should help keep Burrow stable, with guard Dylan Fairchild No. 81) as a high-floor guard prospect who has lots of experience. Linebacker Barrett Carter (No. 119) feels like a potential steal as well.

Not Sure About: Two linebackers feels like a bit much considering Germaine Pratt is a decent starter, although Pratt has requested a trade. Especially since I’m not sold on Demetrius Knight Jr. (No. 49), who was a late bloomer at South Carolina and does not appear to have much more room to grow as a player. Fairchild is a solid interior lineman, but he doesn’t project to be a long-term starter and may just continue the revolving door for the Bengals.

Seattle Seahawks

Grade: A-

Best Pick: S Nick Emmanwori, No. 35 Overall

What We Liked: Lots of jumping on the fallers, a strategy that will always get my approval. Emmanwori and tight end Elijah Arroyo (No. 50) specifically feel like players who fell more based on happenstance than actual inferior play. I like this as a landing spot for quarterback Jalen Milroe, too (No. 92) — give him a chance to learn behind Sam Darnold and get up to speed with NFL play, hopefully allow him to reach that untapped upside everyone was excited about. Getting guard Grey Zabel at No. 18 also feels like a good move for a team that was putting out turnstiles on the interior.

Not Sure About: I don’t feel particularly confident in most of the Day 3 flyers, even wide receiver Tory Horton, who was once considered a Day 2 guy. It feels like he’s a really big injury risk. The others just aren’t particularly talented, with tight end Robbie Ouzts (No. 39) and defensive tackle Rylie Mills (No. 142) being the least interesting of the bunch, two guys who have the build of NFL players but not really the skills to back it up. I don’t have confidence in any of these guys to be regular contributors.

Tampa Bay Buccaneers

Grade: A-

Best Pick: CB Jacob Parrish, No. 84 Overall

What We Liked: The Buccaneers are really ready to fix what didn’t work for them last year, investing heavily in a barren cornerback room and new edge rotational players. Cornerback Benjamin Morrison (No. 53) and Parrish could be a scary duo on the outside and slot, respectively. Emeka Egbuka (No. 19) brings a young face to an aging wide receiver room and could easily become the next Chris Godwin.

Not Sure About: Edge David Walker (No. 121) does not have extensive FBS experience and did not shine at the all-star games, so it feels like a major projection to picture him sticking around as a continuous edge rusher. Could an earlier edge pick and a later wideout selection have set the 49ers up more for immediate success? It’s something to think about for sure. They need only so much from Egbuka considering the capital they spent.

Denver Broncos

Grade: C

Best Pick: CB Jahdae Barron, No. 20 Overall

What We Liked: Barron is a stud. His extreme versatility along with high-end tackling skills and coverage ability should make him a cornerstone of that defense for a while. In an era that’s shifting more toward the idea of “positionless football,” the Broncos are charging forward into the future with a defensive back that is the shining example of that philosophy. I also think edge Sai’vion Jones (No. 101) could work in quickly as a third pass rusher.

Not Sure About: In theory, adding a couple skill players for Bo Nix should work for Denver, but these guys don’t have the juice. Running back RJ Harvey (No. 60) does not have a standout trait and plays slower than his tested speed. Spending a second-round pick on a guy who doesn’t elevate your running back room is a problem. Wide receiver Pat Bryant (No. 74) feels like a guy head coach Sean Payton over-drafted for his blocking ability, but in the third round, it feels like he should have focused on players that can also catch and run with the ball.

Pittsburgh Steelers

Grade: C-

Best Pick: DT Derrick Harmon, No. 21 overall

What We Liked: Lots of big, strong men in this draft. Harmon and Yahya Black (No. 164) shore up the defensive tackle room, giving quick fixes to one-tech and three-tech, hopefully opening up edge rusher T.J. Watt and linebacker Alex Highsmith to converting even more pressures into sacks. Kaleb Johnson (No. 83) feels like he provides the strength and vision coach Mike Tomlin loves from his running backs that he wasn’t getting from Najee Harris. The traits are there that we associate with the Steelers, and it seems like the team has found guys that fit their standards.

Not Sure About: This draft feels like it does not solve the Steelers’ problems. It’s one thing to tap out on quarterback despite having many chances to add a starting-level body to the room (see Shedeur Sanders), but to not add competition at nickel or another pass-catcher until well into day three feels like the team took “take the best player available” just a little too far. The organization lost sight of what was necessary by chasing gritty strength guys and lacked finesse. Do they really need edge Jack Sawyer (No. 123)?

Los Angeles Chargers

Grade: B

Best Pick: WR Tre Harris, No. 55 Overall

What We Liked: The Chargers picked up lots of talented players. The selection of running back Omario Hampton (No. 22) should help the Chargers offense play more toward Jim Harbaugh’s strengths as a coordinator who loves to pound the rock. Harris helps build out a wide receiver room for quarterback Justin Herbert, who I’m sure has been worried about a lack of support. The defensive line adds bring a
really high floor and good power profile to the defense that can hopefully
help the Chargers force more teams to lose yards instead of giving them
time to dink and dunk all over them.

Not Sure About: They have a lot of players I like, but no one in particular I
love. It feels like the Chargers have collected a bunch of low-end starters
here, but no stars that are going to truly elevate the team to the next level.
Edge Kyle Kennard (No. 125), defensive tackle Jamaree Caldwell (No. 86) and Harris all don’t really have the athletic juice to be game-breakers, and Harris seems more and more injured every season. Can Hampton’s lack of creativity survive behind a line that still doesn’t have a very strong interior?

Green Bay Packers

Grade: C-

Best Pick: WR Matthew Golden, No. 23 Overall

What We Liked: Golden at 23 was impressive value that would’ve had me salivating if I was a general manager. He should be the top target for quarterback Jordan Love instantly and finally provide an alpha presence to that room of complementary pieces. General manager Brian Gutekunst took need into account well and addressed nearly all the positions that were missing starting-level talent and injected youth into rooms that had lost veterans to free agency. The floor of that team at the very least has been raised.

Not Sure About: Nearly every pick after Golden felt like a reach. There was constantly better talent on the board, and it looks to me like Gutekunst was
more worried about scheme fit than actually getting the best players possible. Barryn Sorrell (No. 124) and Collin Oliver (No. 159) are good fits for how the Packers run their defense, but ultimately they just don’t have the same natural talent as edge rushers who came off the board later. Wide receiver Savion Williams feels like an attempt to recapture the brief Christian Watson magic, but he has a lot of development still to come.

Minnesota Vikings

Grade: B+

Best Pick: WR Tai Felton, No. 102 Overall

What We Liked: Felton should come in as a great WR3 to give J.J. McCarthy a really easy time finding open receivers. The two early picks put their new quarterback (coming off an injury last year) in a good space to continue the trajectory that Sam Darnold put to good use. Guard Donovan Jackson (No. 24) will help McCarthy stay upright and could flex between guard or tackle depending on what the Vikings need. Defensive tackle Tyrion Ingram-Dawkins (No. 139) provides a lot of athleticism and flexibility to a defensive line that needs more of it. They did the most with what they had.

Not Sure About: There should have been a stronger effort to get more picks in the class. The only trade made was a pick swap that still left them with only four picks. With the value as on point as it was this year, giving Kwesi Adofo-Mensah more darts to throw could have resulted in a boost to the team’s ceiling. The move to get quarterback Sam Howell feels a little underwhelming for a backup option to McCarthy, and securing another rookie might have been a better long-term play. Cornerback not being addressed early means the problems from last year will continue.

Baltimore Ravens

Grade: B

Best Pick: Malaki Starks, No. 27 Overall

What We Liked: Lots of good value early. The Ravens continued their strategy of taking advantage of teams not valuing safety and have now created an imposing secondary between Starks and Kyle Hamilton. Edge Mike Green (No. 59) is a good upside play that far down the board. If even half of his college production translates to the professional level, he’ll be an impact player for the Ravens. I like offensive tackle Emery Jones Jr. (No. 91) as well. He could secure a guard spot for the Ravens with a good training camp. Lots of potential impact here.

Not Sure About: There are too many guys here who haven’t performed
against top-level competition. Offensive tackle Carson Vinson (No. 141) and cornerback Bilhal Kone (No. 178) aren’t battle-tested and could really get exposed if they’re thrown into the fire too early. Even cornerback Robert Longerbeam (No. 212) didn’t have to handle too many top-end talents, and with his weight, I’m not sure his size outlier nature will be a positive at the next level. There are red flags to look out for here.

Detroit Lions

Grade: B-

Best Pick: OG Miles Frazier, No. 171 Overall

What We Liked: The Lions continue their emphasis on size after solid results. Defensive tackle Tyleik Williams (No. 28) is a big hog molly who can handle double teams with ease and should help build out a line that is hopefully less ravaged by injuries this year. Guard Tate Ratledge (No. 57) and Frazier build out a set of interior offensive linemen that could push to start as soon as the beginning of the season if Christian Mahogany doesn’t pan out. It feels like the Lions found their needs early and stuck to their size requirements.

Not Sure About: Trading up with a future third-rounder to get wide receiver Isaac TeSlaa (No. 70) feels like a classic Lions overthink. They love giving up lots of capital to get guys that weren’t even on my radar as potential possibilities, and TeSlaa is no exception. A raw, overaged wideout is not worth multiple Day 2 picks, and I don’t think he’ll do much with the limited time he’ll have at his disposal in the Lions’ wide receiver room. Nor is Ahmed Hassanein (No. 196) a great fix at edge rusher.

Washington Commanders

Grade: A-

Best Pick: Josh Conerly Jr., No. 29 Overall

What We Liked: Great players all the way down. Conerly’s explosive movement skills should make him a great fit for move-blocking and keeping a clean pocket for Jayden Daniels whether he chooses to scramble or not. Cornerback Trey Amos (No. 61) deserved to be taken in the first round and should boost the secondary and help them recover from their early 2023 choice of Emmanuel Forbes. Even their late-round picks of wide receiver Jaylin Lane (No. 128) and linebacker Kain Medrano (No. 205) stand to make an impact with their impressive athleticism.

Not Sure About: The Commanders could have paid a little closer attention to need, as they neglected an empty edge room and did not address the back end of their secondary. While I love Conerly, he may be getting thrown into the fire here before developing as an anchor, which could come back to bite the Commanders as they plan for the future, especially if they move him from his natural position of offensive tackle.

Buffalo Bills

Grade: A-

Best Pick: DT T.J. Sanders, No. 41 Overall

What We Liked: Incredible value outside the first round. Their three players
after their first pick all had first-round buzz at some point in the draft cycle
and will go a long way in rebuilding a defensive line that lacked intensity and sack production last season. Going heavy on defense feels like a particularly bright move; much of their core from the beginning of Josh Allen’s career is aging. That said, tight end Jackson Hawes (No. 173) and offensive tackle Chase Lundt (No. 206) are nice pickups to provide depth in that offense as well.

Not Sure About: Cornerback Maxwell Hairston (No. 30) is fast, but choosing him over Trey Amos feels like it could be an error akin to the Commanders picking Emmanuel Forbes over Christian Gonzalez in the 2023 draft. He lacks consistent tackling skills and has some stiff footwork that will likely give him fits early in his career even though he’s blazing fast. Jordan Hancock (No. 170) and Dorian Strong (No. 177) are good value adds, but did they need to address cornerback THAT bad? I would’ve loved to see a wideout or a safety go earlier for them instead.

Philadelphia Eagles

Grade: B+

Best Pick: LB Jihaad Campbell, No. 31 Overall

What We Liked: Days one and two felt like a coup. Letting the Eagles get a weapon like Campbell in their second level, and maybe even get some reps on edge, feels like we’re asking them to run back a second Super Bowl in a row. Pair him with Andrew Mukuba (No. 64), a lightning-quick safety who is an absolute ballhawk, and it seems like the highlight reel is ready to be replayed. I also dig the value on Drew Kendall (No. 168), a very athletic center prospect who could push Tyler Steen and Cam Jurgens for starting reps.

Not Sure About: Perhaps we were expecting too much, but this doesn’t feel quite like the collection of steals we’re used to from the Eagles, especially in day three. Mac McWilliams (No. 145) was not a draftable talent on our board and does not add meaningful depth to the cornerback room, though he may play on special teams. Linebacker Smael Mondon Jr. (No. 161) is a Georgia guy whom general manager Howie Roseman clearly loves, but this time, the fifth round almost feels like pushing it for a guy who is more of a downhill run-stopper with a lacking mind for coverage. The team also doesn’t feel like it’s building for the near future anymore.

Kansas City Chiefs

Grade: A-

Best Pick: WR Jalen Royals, No. 133 Overall

What We Liked: The Chiefs managed to solve their offensive tackle problem thanks to the fall of Josh Simmons (No. 32), which feels reminiscent of the Trey Smith pick from 2021. As usual, the Chiefs are playing to consensus, picking up talented fallers such as Royals and edge Ashton Gillotte (No. 66), who have the production and athleticism to become quick starters. The Chiefs are sticking to the strategy that turned them into perennial Super Bowl contenders. Good stuff.

Not Sure About: Taking defensive tackle Omarr Norman-Lott (No. 63) feels like a disaster waiting to happen. It’s hard to trust a player who isn’t taking a majority of the snaps for his defense, and to take him on Day 2 is suspect. Also, linebacker Jeffrey Bassa (No. 156) strikes me as a nothing burger player with limited upside, not someone who projects to have a role starting anytime soon or even a role on special teams.

Houston Texans

Grade: B+

Best Pick: WR Jayden Higgins, No. 24 Overall

What We Liked: The Texans kicked off the draft incredibly well, getting the
dynamic wide receiver from Iowa State and offensive tackle Aireontae Ersery (No. 48), two players who could immediately earn starting time on the Texans and will help quarterback C.J. Stroud return to rookie form. Jaylen Reed (No. 187) is also a sneaky good safety pick on Day 3 who picked up a lot of responsibilities after Kevin Winston Jr. got injured. Also, from a comic standpoint, I like that the Texans picked three Jaylin variations and a Jayden.

Not Sure About: The two USC players, cornerback Jaylin Smith (No. 97) and running back Woody Marks (No. 116), were a bit overdrafted, with Marks being traded up for with crazy levels of capital. I don’t see either of them getting many early reps, even Marks, who I’m not sure is ready for prime time. It feels like the offensive line needed to be fortified a bit more since Stroud was running for his life a lot of the year. The Texans’ shift toward more weapons feels like they misunderstood the issue.

Los Angeles Rams

Grade: D+

Best Pick: LB Chris Paul Jr., No. 172 Overall

What We Liked: Really great pick for Paul, who projects as an early starter and is adept in pass coverage. That’s an absolute steal deep into day three. Jarquez Hunter profiles as lightning to Kyren Williams’ rumbling thunder. Coach Sean McVay clearly has a vision for his scheme that involves getting highly productive college players and letting them do reprise their success from the NCAA level. McVay is sticking to his guns.

Not Sure About: Tight end Terrance Ferguson (No. 46) and edge Josaiah Stewart (90) didn’t make for an inspiring day two haul. I felt Stewart could reasonably have gone undrafted after a heinously bad 40-yard dash, considering his size combined with his limited length. The college pressure rates are good, but you have to think about his comparison to NFL competition. And I just never saw any game-wrecking moments or any sections of Ferguson’s tape that popped out to me. He really seemed like an ordinary tight end, which isn’t how you want to start your draft.

–Dean Bruce, special to Field Level Media





Link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sports

No. 3 Volleyball Topples No. 1 Nebraska to Earn Program’s First Final Four – Texas A&M Athletics

Published

on


LINCOLN – The No. 3 seed Texas A&M volleyball team handed the No. 1 overall seed Nebraska Cornhuskers their first home loss since November 26, 2022, to claim victory in Sunday afternoon’s NCAA Regional Final at the Bob Devaney Sports Center, 3-2 (25-22, 25-22, 20-25, 35-37, 15-13).
 

The Aggies (27-4) won an instant classic over Nebraska (33-1) to punch their ticket to the Final Four. The teams split the opening four frames setting up a winner-take-all finale, and it was the Maroon & White who reigned victorious behind a complete team victory which included 75 kills, 17 blocks and nine aces.

 

Nebraska came out of the gate on the front foot, as head coach Jamie Morrison called his first timeout of the match trailing 9-3. The Aggies found their footing, cutting into the deficit to 12-9 behind a stretch at the service line from Tatum Thomas. The Cornhuskers won the race to 15 (15-10), but Texas A&M answered right back with a 7-0 run forcing Nebraska to burn both of its timeouts. The onslaught continued, as Cos-Okpalla recorded two aces paired with a Cornhusker error, stretching the lead to 20-15. Nebraska battled back within one as coach Morrison huddled up his squad up 21-20. The Maroon & White would not be denied, as once again the service line was the difference, with an ace from Maddie Waak sealing the opener, 25-22.

 

Carrying the momentum into the second, the Aggies forged an early 5-2 lead. Nebraska responded with a streak of its own inch ahead 10-9. Waak once again got the ball rolling, spearheading a 4-0 run from the service line which included two aces, a kill from Kyndal Stowers and a solo block from Cos-Okpalla as the Maroon & White went ahead 14-11. The train kept rolling, as the gap extended by one as the Cornhuskers huddled up for the time in the frame down 19-15. Nebraska mounted a late comeback in the frame, trimming the deficit to 24-22, but a timeout from coach Morrison was what the team needed Lednicky landed the final blow of the set with the Aggies prevailing 25-22 for a two-set advantage.

 

The Cornhuskers strung together a streak early in the third building a 10-5 advantage, but a response came once again as the Maroon & White ripped off four-straight to shrink the gap to one. The programs began trading points down the stretch and it was Nebraska who grabbed the frame, 25-20, and cut into the match lead, 2-1.

 

Back-and-forth scoring opened fourth, as the teams were knotted on five occasions through the first 14 points including 7-7. Texas A&M was the team to create some breathing room, again thanks to Thomas leading three-straight from the service line as Nebraska huddled up down 10-7. The Aggies would not be waver, extending the gap to 15-10 as the Cornhuskers called their final timeout. Nebraska grabbed one back, as Coach Morrison collected his squad with a break (18-14). The set went the well in extras and it was Nebraska narrowly took the frame, 37-35, and sent the match to a fifth set.

 

In the deciding final frame, it was the Aggies who captured the early momentum leading 8-6 as the programs swapped ends. Texas A&M kept rolling with a 4-1 streak, forcing the Cornhuskers to burn both timeouts trailing 12-8. Nebraska persisted, as the Maroon & White called a break with the advantage down to 13-11. The Aggies found themselves one point from victory and it was Lednicky who dealt the game-winning blow (15-13) ensuring their spot in the Final Four.

 

Following the conclusion of the Regional, the Aggies claimed four of the seven All-Tournament Team selections, headlined by Lednicky who was named the Regional Most Outstanding Player, while Waak, stowers and Ava Underwood were also named to the team.

 

STAT LEADERS

Kills – Kyndal Stowers – 25

Hitting Percentage (Min. 10 kills) – Kyndal Stowers – .327

Assists – Maddie Waak – 63

Aces – Maddie Waak – 4

Digs – Kyndal Stowers – 16

Blocks – Morgan Perkins – 9

 

GAME NOTES

  • Logan Lednicky recorded her 21st consecutive game with 10 or more kills and climbed to No. 3 in career kills passing Hollann Hans (1,640).
  • Ifenna Cos-Okpalla climbed to No. 2 on the program’s career block list passing Cindy Lothspeich (552).
  • The Aggies secured their first Final Four berth in program history.
  • The victory over Nebraska marks the programs second win versus a No. 1 ranked opponent and first in 30 years.

 
UP NEXT

The Maroon & White head to Kansas City for the NCAA Tournament Final Four where they will face No. 1 seed Pittsburgh, Thursday, Dec. 18 with timing details to be announced at a later date.
 
FOLLOW THE AGGIES
Visit 12thMan.com for more information on Texas A&M volleyball. Fans can keep up to date with the A&M volleyball team on Facebook, Instagram and on Twitter by following @AggieVolleyball.
 
 

 

 





Link

Continue Reading

Sports

Texas A&M after upsetting Nebraska volleyball: ‘We’re the grittiest team in the country by far’

Published

on


Women’s Volleyball

Dec. 14, 2025

Texas A&M after upsetting Nebraska volleyball: ‘We’re the grittiest team in the country by far’

Dec. 14, 2025

Watch the postgame interview with Texas A&M volleyball seniors Kyndal Stowers, Logan Lednicky and Ifenna Cos-Okpalla after the Aggies stunned undefeated No. 1 overall seed Nebraska in a five-set regional final battle.



Link

Continue Reading

Sports

Nebraska volleyball’s dream season comes to a whimpering end | Sports

Published

on


This story has been told multiple times over the last few years with Nebraska volleyball. Harper Murray said that she would win three more titles the rest of her time with the Huskers two seasons ago. The reverse sweep at the hands of last year’s Penn State team, on the backs of head coach Katie Schumacher-Cawley beating cancer, felt like sports destiny. 

Sports destiny seemed to be on their side for the last 16 weeks. An undefeated, storybook season, with the final games of the season just three short hours away in Kansas City, Missouri, seemed almost too perfect to draw up. Then it was all whisked away in a form far too familiar on the biggest stage.

In the regional final, the third-seeded and ninth-overall team, Texas A&M, stormed into Lincoln and fought through one of the greatest regular-season teams of all time. The Aggies did something that no team, not even the Kentucky Wildcats in the fourth game of the season, could do. Kentucky held a two-set lead on Nebraska and couldn’t get the job done in Nashville. But in one of the toughest environments in college sports, not just college volleyball, Texas A&M ran through the proverbial buzzsaw with its own jackhammer.

What had caused the Huskers’ trouble all year long came back to bite them in the worst way: serve receive. Nine aces were recorded by the Aggies today, with eight of those aces coming before intermission. Junior libero Laney Choboy was responsible for five of the first eight aces. After the serve receive seemingly was cleaned up after giving up nine aces to Maryland on Sept. 27, the issue came back to rear its ugly head. Between Sunday’s game and the Maryland match, Nebraska had not given up more than five aces (twice, Oregon and UCLA) in one contest.

Sunday’s match was a grueling dogfight all the way around, something unlike Nebraska had seldom seen all season long. See to the 37-35 set four score, which felt like a repeat of Oregon’s 41-39 set two win over Minnesota in the 2018 tournament. The fight never ran out. Until it was too late.

No matter where the 2025 Huskers finished in the tournament, the squad would live forever in the history books. A perfect regular season with a coach at her alma mater with a legend riding off into the sunset? The storylines wrote themselves.

Written with emotion, Nebraska experienced what they thought they wouldn’t this year. Since summer workouts, whether it was spoken into existence or not, the goal really was championship or bust. Finishing first in a grueling Big Ten wouldn’t suffice. Neither would a regional title. Nor would an appearance in the title game. Only would hoisting the big prize on December 21, 2025, inside the T-Mobile Center in Kansas City, Missouri, be enough.

The difference between 2023’s dominant team and 2025’s was the heat check that came in the regular season. The Huskers’ loss to rival Wisconsin, a three-set drubbing on Black Friday, allowed for an opportunity to reset themselves before postseason play began just a week later. That opportunity was not afforded to this version of Nebraska because they were far too dominant all season long.

The Huskers assembled one of the largest rosters in recent memory, fueled by an NIL siphon into a program that has risen to stardom not just on a national, but on a worldwide scale. With 17 players on the roster, the talent rivaled an all-star caliber squad that a professional team could put together. Depth bit them right in the foot.

With freshman setter Campbell Flynn breaking her finger earlier in the week, and senior opposite hitter Allie Sczech suffering a freak accident during warmups, the roster was already smaller. With three redshirts on the bench, that meant only 12 active bodies. Nebraska head coach Dani Busboom Kelly attributes the thin bench, but also sickness floating around the locker room, as part of the problem at hand.

No depth problem will be able to sideline the performance on the court.

Freshman middle blocker Manaia Ogbechie was thrust into the limelight with junior counterpart Andi Jackson struggling to find any kind of momentum. With a few more healthy bodies, Busboom Kelly might have had a chance to sub in Flynn or Sczech for an under-the-weather Reilly or an at-times struggling freshman opposite Virginia Adriano.

“I think she’s really mature for her age and as a competitor,” senior middle blocker Rebekah Allick said postgame on Ogbechie. “We told her just to hit everything, and she did that.”

The celebration that Nebraska has had so close in their grasp has availed them times aplenty. Over the last three seasons, the Huskers are 99-6 but with just one appearance on the sport’s biggest stage. Texas A&M will now get to be front and center for the first time ever.

A team of dreams, overlooked by many in their own conference, with rival Texas and Kentucky running away with their regionals, slayed the giant. David took down Goliath.

“There are no words to describe this feeling,” senior outside hitter Logan Lednicky said postgame. “Why not us?”

The team that has yelled “Why not us?” from the mountaintop, a program that has built itself from the ground up since head coach Jamie Morrison’s arrival, can now scream that same phrase when they play the Pittsburgh Panthers on Thursday in the same gym Nebraska wanted to get to. 

“We have the most wins that this program has ever had,” Morrison said postgame after achieving his 27th win of the year. “That’s not an accident.”

Nor is it an accident that they will play for the national title. It wasn’t going to be an accident that the Huskers could play for a national title either. 

“I wanted to be somewhere that could be developed into one of the best programs in the country,” senior middle blocker Ifenna Coz-Okpalla said postgame. “To be sitting here after beating Nebraska, it’s insane.”

A Husker team that was hyped all year long has fallen short of its goals. A national champion banner is still waiting to be hoisted inside the Bob Devaney Sports Center after their most recent in 2017. So many close calls. So many heartbreaks. The book is far from being finished.

Look to the alumni who continue to be a part of the program even though their eligibility is gone. Merritt Beason and Leyla Blackwell, two graduates from the 2024 team, were in attendance on Sunday. Lexi Rodriguez, arguably one of the greatest liberos in college volleyball, continues to have relationships with the players.

“I’ve always looked up to Lexi Rodriguez,” Allick said postgame. “She maybe didn’t always have something to say, but she always made the play, but maybe it was the random hand hold or the hug. It was very intentional.”

With a senior class, specifically spotlighted by four-year letterwinners Allick and senior defensive specialist Maisie Boesiger, that has poured so much into the program throughout their time, don’t expect that continuity to end.

“[Allick] has put her heart and soul into this program, and you can tell by her face how much she cares,” Murray said postgame, speaking on behalf of her distraught teammate. “I don’t even care if we win or lose. She’s going to take away the memories and the relationships we’ve made, winning and losing.”

The loss hurts. Undoubtedly. The book on a video game-level team has written its final chapter on the 2025 season. It went out with a bang, a five-set thriller, but on the wrong side. Perhaps the new version of the John Cook Arena will bear more fruit when it comes online next year. 

But for now, the dreams and destiny of hoisting the big prize will have to wait another year.

“We’re excited to be back next year,” Murray said postgame.

Danny Berg is a volleyball beat writer for the Daily Nebraskan. Follow him on X

sports@dailynebraskan.com 



Link

Continue Reading

Sports

Texas A&M stuns Nebraska, advances to NCAA volleyball Final Four

Published

on


LINCOLN, Neb. — Texas A&M earned its first trip to the Final Four in women’s volleyball, upsetting previously unbeaten Nebraska in five sets on Sunday.

The top-ranked Huskers lost for the first time in 34 matches this season and saw streaks snapped of 29 consecutive postseason home wins and 63 consecutive home wins. Coach Dani Busboom Kelly’s team was denied a 19th trip to the Final Four.

A&M, seeded third in the Lincoln regional, won 15-13 in the decisive fifth set on Logan Lednicky’s 24th kill of the match. The Aggies (27-4) will make the trip to Kansas City to face Pitt on Thursday in a semifinal match. Kentucky will face Texas or Wisconsin in the other semifinal at the T-Mobile Center, with the winners to play for the national championship on Sunday, Dec. 21.

Coach Jamie Morrison’s team stunned the crowd at Devaney Center by winning the first two sets, both by scores of 25-22. The Huskers had won 54 of 55 sets at home this season before the regional final.

Nebraska rebounded with a 25-20 win in the third set and came back from 18-11 down in an epic fourth set that rated as one of the most dramatic in NCAA postseason history. Nebraska notched 10 set points, finally winning on a kill by Virginia Adriano. The Huskers fought off three match points.

“I think it might have been one of the most entertaining matches in the history of the sport,” Texas A&M coach Jamie Morrison said.

In the fifth set, the Aggies led 12-8 before Nebraska made a run. It staved off two more match points and came within one point of evening the score on a Harper Murray kill before Lednicky’s game-winner.

“We’re this good,” Morrison said. “(Nebraska) hadn’t been around a team that was going to stand up the way we did. We’re this tough. We’re this resilient. We’re this gritty.”

Kyndal Stowers led Texas A&M with 25 kills. Murray had 25 for Nebraska.

Pitt (30-4) beat third-seeded Purdue in four sets on Saturday. The Panthers advanced to a national semifinal for the fifth consecutive season — the first program to complete such a run since Texas from 2012 to 2016. Pitt is seeking its first appearance in a national championship match. It lost last year against Louisville in the semifinals.

Reigning national player of the year Olivia Babcock, among 14 semifinalists for the award this season, was named the most outstanding player of the Pitt regional.

Kentucky (29-2) swept third-seeded Creighton on Saturday to reach Kansas City. Outside hitters Brooklyn DeLeye and Eva Hudson combined for 32 kills. The Wildcats have won 26 consecutive matches and swept the SEC regular-season and tournament titles.



Link

Continue Reading

Sports

Texas A&M upsets No. 1 Nebraska, advances to first-ever Final Four

Published

on


Updated Dec. 14, 2025, 5:11 p.m. CT

The Texas A&M volleyball program upset the No. 1 seed Nebraska Cornhuskers, 3-2, and is advancing to the Final Four for the first time in program history.

The Aggies’ miraculous reverse sweep of Louisville on Friday showed that this team has the determination and talent to beat any team in the country. That sentiment was proven again on Sunday afternoon, as the Aggies powered past the Cornhuskers for the program’s first win over a top-ranked opponent since 1985.

It all started with a dominant 2-0 lead through the first two sets. Texas A&M outscored Nebraska 50-44 and seemed in firm control of the match. The deficit was the first the Cornhuskers had faced since August 31 against the Kentucky Wildcats, in which the program reverse swept to take the match. Sunday was a different story, however. Texas A&M let the third and fourth set slip by, but the 15-13 win in the fifth set sealed the deal for the Aggies to send them to the school’s first Final Four.





Link

Continue Reading

Sports

Texas A&M women’s volleyball upsets Nebraska to reach final 4

Published

on


The NCAA women’s volleyball tournament was rocked Sunday as Texas A&M upset previously undefeated No. 1 Nebraska 3-2, sending the Aggies to the program’s first final four.

The Huskers, who have won five national championships, had mostly cruised through this season but ran into an Aggies squad playing its best at the most important time.

“A lot of us are seniors, and we’ve been doing this for a really long time,” said Texas A&M’s Logan Lednicky, who had 24 kills and 6 block assists. “And I think all the newbies came in ready to work, ready to grind.”

Sophomore Kyndal Stowers had 25 kills and 16 digs for Texas A&M (27-4), which finished second to Kentucky in the SEC regular-season standings. The Wildcats are also headed to the final four; they advanced Saturday with a 3-0 win against Creighton.

Kentucky will face the winner of Sunday’s last regional final, between No. 1 seed Texas and No. 3 Wisconsin, on Thursday in Kansas City. The Aggies will meet No. 1 seed Pitt in the semifinals after the Panthers advanced Saturday with a 3-1 win over Purdue.

Texas A&M, the No. 3 seed in the Lincoln regional, upset No. 2 seed Louisville in a reverse sweep Friday. The Aggies almost had the same thing done to them when they won the first two sets against the Huskers, but lost the next two and were forced to a first-to-15 fifth set (must win by 2).

Texas A&M won the deciding set 15-13 in front of stunned sold-out crowd at Nebraska’s Bob Devaney Center. It was the Huskers’ first loss at home since Nov. 26, 2022, against Minnesota.

It was just the second time in Texas A&M program history that the Aggies defeated a No. 1-ranked team. They previously did so in 1995 against Stanford.

For Nebraska, it was another heartbreaking end to the season. The Huskers last won the national championship in 2017, when it was also held in Kansas City, and were hopeful of repeating that this year in the city just 3.5-hours south of their campus.

Since 2017, Nebraska has lost three times in the national championship match — in 2018, 2021 and 2023 — and fell in the national semifinals last season to eventual champion Penn State.

Former Huskers player and assistant Dani Busboom Kelly took over the program this season when longtime coach John Cook retired. She led Louisville to the NCAA final last year and in 2022, and it seemed things were set up for a storybook finish to her first season guiding Nebraska.

But it wasn’t to be, as Texas A&M out-blocked Nebraska 30-16 in what was one of the biggest keys to the upset.

“A really awesome game by Texas A&M,” Busboom Kelly said. “They played like they had six seniors on the court. I’m proud of the way we fought back. We played our hearts out.”

After losing the first two sets, both 25-22, Nebraska won the third set 25-20. That set the stage for what turned into a match-within-the-match, a 37-35 fourth set won by the Huskers on their 10th set point. It seemed as if that turned the momentum toward Nebraska, but the Aggies still had the last word in the fifth set.

“You play sports to prove who’s better in that moment,” Texas A&M coach Jamie Morrison said. “We came out on top of that, and I’m fired up.”



Link

Continue Reading

Most Viewed Posts

Trending